Hey, seems like your "crack" staff missd a news report from one of those crackpot sources--THE NEWHOUR WITH JIM LEHRER!!!

Yeah, those French.
Libert�, Egalit�, Fraternit�.
Isn't it just like them to complain when elections don't work right? So predictable.
-q

EG, if you have a LINK to a Newshour story post it here otherwise quit talking out of your (tin foil) hat.

Q, "elections don't work right" meaning when they don't produce the outcome you want? How else to explain your lack of concern about voting problems in states or counties that went for Kerry.

You blackboxers might have a shred of credibility if you made an effort to cite examples of how Democrats benefited from voting "irregularities" for every example you cite of how Republicans benefited.

Instead you focus almost all your energy in Ohio and the balance in Florida and each instance of a voting irregularity you claim occurred benefited Republicans.

Where were all you left-wing loons on the topic of verified voting in 1992 and 1996?

Bob: Many of the claims about "voting irregularities" are in fact based on concern over voting problems in states and counties that went for Bush. The complaints about Florida were (mostly) in counties with high numbers of registered Democrats but yet the counties went to Bush. These complaints have been mostly debunked but nevertheless they were complaints about voting problems in counties that went for Bush. Furthermore, both Florida AND Ohio were states that went to Bush. So, no, there isn't a lack of concern about voting problems that occurred in Republican states and counties, it's precisely the opposite. There have also been plenty of stories about voting problems in states that would not benefit the Dems. Here is a list of all states other than Florida and Ohio that have reported voting problems in 2004 (below you will find the links so that you can follow up and get more informed about the issues):

Colorado
Iowa
Louisiana
Michigan
Minnesota
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
North Carolina
Oklahoma
Pennsylvania
South Carolina
Virginia
West Virginia
Wisconsin

http://www.kotv.com/main/home/stories.asp?whichpage=1&id=72222

http://www.kotv.com/main/home/stories.asp?whichpage=1&id=72222

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2004/story?id=216032&page=1

Again, if you care at all about serving the public good (or just being a good citizen in general) you'll take some time to become informed about the voting problems in 2004.

On an added note, much of the MSM has been covering the "voting irregularities" story over te past few weeks: Hardball and MSNBC (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6575858/), CNN (http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/11/23/election.investigation/) and ABC (see link above), just to name a few. Why aren't you attacking them? Or do you just have some kind of personal problem with Keith Olbermann? A little Olbermann envy maybe?

M,

You are making it too easy. In fact, so easy that I am going to show you what a nice guy I am and give you a chance to re-read my comment again...slowly...before eviscerating you with my rapier wit.

After you READ my comment, go back and look at yours. In particular, "there isn't a lack of concern about voting problems that occurred in Republican states and counties, it's precisely the opposite."

An "oops" will suffice.

BTW, I can only explain my purpose in creating OlbermannWatch.com so many times. If are not willing to accept my explanation there is not much I can do.