OlbermannWatch.com "My Faves" Set
OlbermannWatch.com Favorited Photos from other Flickr Users
Got OlbyPhotos? See some on Flickr? DO NOT email us. Send us a FlickrMail instead. Include a link to the photo. If we like the photo you will see it displayed in the Olby Flickr Flood above.
New to Flickr? Sign up for a FREE Flickr account!
New to YouTube? Sign up for a FREE YouTube account!
Links to OlbermannWatch.com
Blog posts tagged with "Olbermann"|
|
| Subscribe to Olbermann Watch Mailing List |
| Visit this group |
Ever wonder what Olby Loons do when they are not trolling on Olbermann Watch?
Jump on over to the Keith Olbermann entry at Wikipedia and see. If you want a good laugh check out their version of a NPOV (that's Neutral Point of View) entry for KO.
I have made edits to the entry over the last couple of weeks only to see them "reverted" by the Olby Loons. Now they've banned me for - get this - too many "reverts". Of course, I'm not making reversions to previous editions of the entry...they are. But one of the Olby Loons has been around long enough that they have been granted the status of "admin" and are now abusing their ability to "ban" editors to ban me. We all know how this works where in OlbyWorld black is white and white is black so reverting my edits is actually me reverting their edits. Can you say "cloud cuckoo land",
The chief loon over at KeithOlbermann.org has been trying to promote her hapless site via Wikipedia and had this typical libnut exchange with waffleiron who is actually D-Day from Things I passionately dislike which I mentioned the other day for their hilarious "OlbermannWatchWatch" post. Even OlbyLoon D-Day wasn't buying it...
I did not delete anyone else's site, and I would appreciate it if folks would stop deleting mine.[KO.org loony girl]
Wikipedia is not a venue for you to promote a website you own. You admit you just created it and you are using this to increase your traffic. That's advertising and therefore fails according to WP:SPAM --waffle iron 23:17, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
Not at all--the fact that I created the site does not prevent me from noting it's existance. I happened to notice it first since I wrote it. It is not spam.
Try again. - The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.96.215.99 (talk • contribs) .
If you scroll down you will find an entry I made to the discussion page:
Entire Keith Olbermann Entry Massively non-NPOV in which I fisk the Keith Olbermann entry.
There is a similarily aburd entry for Countdown with Keith Olbermann where they, from time to time, permit mention of "OlbermannWatch". Of course, it's in their usual lefty-slanted style.
As they have seen fit to ban me (for 24 hours) perhaps some of you clear-thinking OlbyWatch readers would care to contribute to Wikipedia. It's really easy - you just click on EDIT THIS PAGE and make edits directly into the HTML. If you don't know how to do that you are more than welcome to copy/paste my version into a text editor and use that as the basis for your edits...just copy/paste into the edit field on the Wikipedia sight and press save. Careful not to do this more than three times in 24 hours or you will be banned too.
They seem to revert the changes between 10-75 minutes after I make them so if we had maybe 10 people willing to edit the page for NPOV and each makes three edits a day we ought to keep up with these Olby Loons and give a more balanced account of Keith Olbermann.
BTW, I am not advocating anything untoward here. I do believe my edits to the site are very fair and I am not looking to post bad things about Keith Olbermann but if you read Entire Keith Olbermann Entry Massively non-NPOV you will see that they have basically turned the entry in a Keith Olbermann Fan Site.
They must be stopped before they Wiki again!!!!!
HTML FOR A NPOV KEITH OLBERMANN ENTRY
HTML FOR A NPOV COUNTDOWN WITH KEITH OLBERMANN ENTRY
You are right; people think it's tricky or complicated to do an edit, but it's just a bit of typing, or a quick cut and paste. I just made a few small amendments to the Countdown page, in the interest of accuracy. For one thing, I corrected the preposterous claim that Countdown has 3/4 of the ratings of Bill O'Reilly. (The truth: as of March 2006 Meltdown had 404,000, O'Reilly had over 2,000,000.) I also added a balancing paragraph to the Olby/O'Reilly feud section, pointing out a few times when our Olby was making false charges. I don't know why anyone would remove any of this, since it is all documented, but if they do, it's because they don't want accuracy, they just want a shrine to Krazy Keith.
I hope KfK (and others) read this and head on over there. Just because Countdown is totally one-sided and biased, the stupid Wiki page doesn't have to be too.
I was just over at the KO site. Did you know that you have to register even to go into the troll forum now! Oh yeah like I'm gona give those Loons my e-mail address. Here Loon or not you can pretty much post and go! This site is rated number one for that reason. Plus of course it is fact based. Just a thought. Glenn Beck is starting up around May 1st at 7pm est. I'm just thinking Nancy Grace right now gets terrible numbers for a lead-in. This should only help her and burry Keith even further.
Hey Puck,
Is that Great thinker Jack Frost over there plotting his march to power!
Jack Frost,
Once you brought up the race issue I said it was personal! Evry post I do will mock and insult you until I get an apology for pathetic racial remark.
His butt-buddy in sports is Dan Patrick
Fox, CNN, NBC... that's a hat trick
He can't hold a job
Cuz he's blowing Dan's knob
Keith needs more therapy, he's sick
Saturday night.
8 p.m.
Where's Robert Cox?
Fighting with other losers on the internet.
Wow.
I wish I was you, Bob.
puck - troll? I think you may be "trawl" but what I think you really mean is to "lurk"...to read posts to the forum without posting yourself to see what folks are talking about.
A troll is someone who posts crap in an attempt to get attention by pissing people off...you know...like many of the lefty loons from those sites who post over here. As you can see not all of them think that because Trekkie, who posts here, has actively discouraged that sort of thing over there. Whether they do or don't troll is not a reason for any of us clear-thinkers to troll there or anywhere else. It's one of the things that seperates us from the loony left - when we say we believe in free speech we mean it! Let them "talk" - the more the talk the DUmber they sound.
as for Qualin...
You are hurting my feelings. Boo hoo hoo. You called me a loser. Waaaaaah! That REALLY hurts.
Now back to the clear-thinkers reading this great and insightful blog...note how qualin provides yet another text-book example of why the loony left has been roundly rejected by the American people. Unable to develop a logical argument for the policies you advocate or the points of view that you hold you are left with nothing better to do than stick your tounge out and say "ooga booga".
I have only one counter-argument to such deep, thoughtful political analysis and media criticism: "ooga booga" back to you!
Puck-- what Bob means by "troll" is anyone who posts an opinion here that differs from his own opinion. And what he means by "troll" is anyone here who makes comments, even in the form of meaningful debate, that are critical of his behavior.
According to Bob's previous comments from other threads, appropriate forms of punishment for "trolls" include (but are not limited to) following you around the internet, collecting and analyzing personal information that may be publicly available (including information about your family members), releasing all or some of that information on the pages of his website, asserting that he has potentially private (not publicly available) information about you that may get released in the event that he feels particularly angry, and making slanderous/inaccurate (intentionally or not) about said "trolls."
He also spends an unfathomable amount of time keeping track of these "trolls" (who he claims are insignificant and meaningless); which I find completely inexplicable. But whatever, to each his own, I suppose.
Trolls are the 3rd most dangerous people on the planet.
Q
Just for fun, tell us how you reconcile your notion that I don't want people who disagree with me to post comments on this site with your own comments being on this site.
This should be good!
I don't have to, you just did it for me by proving my point and claiming to know all kinds of personal information about me and threatening to give it out.
My point has been made.
Damm! all this over troll posting! No, I'm sure you folks have seen this,and. I would like to see Trekkie opine on this. It use to be over at the KO site the only place you could go to post as a guest was the troll section (cute). Now you can't do that anymore. C.I.D. that you now have to give information about you're self before you go onto a site where the folks are hostile towards you to start. Doesn't that make you think that they wouldn't try the same stuff you are accusing Mr.Cox of? Here you have Loons from both sides, Clear thinking folks from both sides. Okay we get off topic. But this place is a lot closer to an old style, FREE SPEECH! Town square meeting then the KO site. But C.I.D. if you are correct about Mr.Cox, Then he should have done this to other people. Can you bring them forward? Wait! you could be right. Robert Cox, WHAT HAVE YOU DONE WITH SHELLY STAR!?!?
Trolls are the third most dangerous people on the planet? I always thought it was League Bowlers.
Happy Easter all!
Damm! all this over troll posting! No, I'm sure you folks have seen this,and. I would like to see Trekkie opine on this. It use to be over at the KO site the only place you could go to post as a guest was the troll section (cute). Now you can't do that anymore. C.I.D. that you now have to give information about you're self before you go onto a site where the folks are hostile towards you to start. Doesn't that make you think that they wouldn't try the same stuff you are accusing Mr.Cox of? Here you have Loons from both sides, Clear thinking folks from both sides. Okay we get off topic. But this place is a lot closer to an old style, FREE SPEECH! Town square meeting then the KO site. But C.I.D. if you are correct about Mr.Cox, Then he should have done this to other people. Can you bring them forward? Wait! you could be right. Robert Cox, WHAT HAVE YOU DONE WITH SHELLY STAR!?!?
Trolls are the third most dangerous people on the planet? I always thought it was League Bowlers.
Happy Easter all!
League bowlers have dropped to "17th most dangerous" in the latest Carnegies Institute for Peace survey of most dangerous people.
CID, I asked my uncle Karl (rove) to have the NSA tap your phone and will be airing those recordings on the Rush Limbaugh show a week from Tuesday.
CID, I asked my uncle Karl (rove) to have the NSA tap your phone and will be airing those recordings on the Rush Limbaugh show a week from Tuesday.
Hey, thanks so much for what you're doing here! I never liked Olbermann, even before he became the darling of DailyKos. Now there's a whole website exposing his lies.
Thanks!
Nobody with a brain believes Wikipedia anyway.
I want to go out on a limb and predict that the Krazy One will harp on the following stories tomorrow (in other words, he will like the stories, for he does not report what he does not like):
The Generals and Rummy
Tony Blair's cowardly stance toward Iran and his slap at the US
Exxon chairman makes too much money.
I won't be watching, but J$ will -- any bets?
Let's all stop watching Olbermann. Anybody that the Foreign ministry of Iran likes is bad! I say replce Keith Olbermann with Cesar Milan of the Dog Whisperer!
Let's all stop watching Olbermann. Anybody that the Foreign ministry of Iran likes is bad! I say replce Keith Olbermann with Cesar Milan of the Dog Whisperer!
I was just over at the ESPN site and I clicked over to "The Dan Patrick Show's" page. Now correct me if I'm wrong but hasn't KO been there for a little over a year? Yes he's only on a hour a day but, NO MENTION ON THE PAGE? He better thank his lucky stars he never burned his bridges with Patrick.
404,000.....Didn't Jim Jones have a bigger cult following? Okay he didn't. But did you know he used FLAVOR-AID not KOOL-AID to mix in the spiked drinks? Bit-o-trivia.
First there was Jonestown. Could soon there be Olbyland?
A note about ratings...
I have to admit I don't really follow the ratings issue for Countdown that closely. I see the reader comments but don't personally write too many posts about it. As someone with academic and professional training in preparing and conducting data analysis I am not impressed by seeing "snapshot" data about this week or that week's ratings or quarter on quarter comparisons.
For their own reasons, the KO fans are absolutely obsessed with every blip up in the ratings; KO critics every blip down. Despite the protestations from the lefties who troll this site, we make it a point to be 100% accurate (correcting errors if/when we make any) and providing links/sources to back up any assertions in our posts.
With that in mind, I'd like to do some serious trend analysis on the ratings of Countdown and post the results - whatever they may be. I do not, however, have the slightest interest in combing the web looking for ratings data and then compiling what will likely be an incomplete set of data.
Anyone out there have access to what I really need?
1) ratings for MSNBC at 8-9 PM from 1996 to 2006
2) ratings for MSNBC from 6 PM to 12 PM from January 2003 - present
3) ratings for MSNBC, CNN, FNC, HNN at 8-9 PM from January 2003 - present
Bob,
I have looked for that data and have not found it to do precisely what you have in mind. I particularly wanted to look into the overall increase in cable viewership over the years and how that relates to relative ratings.
More predictions for tonights Meltdown -- stories Keith will ignore:
No Hint Seen in Memo that Plame's Role Was Secret
By JOSH GERSTEIN - Staff Reporter of the Sun
April 17, 2006
http://www.nysun.com/article/31062
and this:
Rumsfeld Did Not Intimidate, Former Air Force Chief Says
By DOUGLASS DANIEL - Associated Press
April 17, 2006
http://www.nysun.com/article/31076
Both of these stories will not be welcome on Meltdown.
Bob,
Here is why ratings for cable news are a joke anyway:
The Scoreboard: Thursday, April 13
25-54 demographic:
8PM
1. O'Reilly 423,000
2. CNBC DEAL OR NO DEAL! 325,000
3. CNNHN murder report with Nancy Grace 222,000
4. MSLSD's Meltdown with psycho 155,000
5. CNN's Paula "the bird hater"* Zahn 113,000
That TVNewser kid didn't tell us the total numbers for the "Deal or No Deal" repeat, or I'd report them too.
Goes to show ya -- Monty Hall would pull better ratings than everyone except O'Reilly. Howie Mandel more than doubles Keith's ratings in the oh-so-important demo? Why don't the execs get smart and show Spongebob repeats -- ratings will triple.
Countdown with Keith Olbermann, preaching to the craziest 0.1% of the population nightly on MSLSD.
*"the bird hater" is a reference to bleeding-heart Paula's role in the eviction of hawks from the ledge of their NYC building:
"Pale Male is a Red-tailed Hawk (Buteo jamaicensis) . . . as the first Red-tailed Hawk known to have nested on a building (rather than in a tree), he was the subject of an episode of the PBS series Nature."
"The hawks' nest is located on ornamental stonework above a top-story window on a very upscale residential housing cooperative at 927 Fifth Avenue (at East 74th Street) on the Upper East Side of Manhattan. In December 2004, the hawks' nest and the anti-pigeon spikes that had long anchored it were removed by the board of the co-op. . .Richard Cohen, at the time the President of the co-op (and husband of Paula Zahn), signed off on the destruction of the nest."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pale_Male
As with all Wikipedia articles, read with caution.
That didn't take long. I was banned from Wikipedia (for 24 hours) and "put on notice".
User:Rcox1963
The three complaintants in my "case" that led to me being banned - sigmafactor, waffle iron and D-Day - are two KO fans from SUNY-Plattsburgh and D-Day you will recall has made all sorts of personal attacks me on his blog, "Things I hate passionately", for posts that I didn't write (J$ wrote them).
There was no "hearing" so I was not afforded the opportunity to respond to these "complaints" but was able to add my reply to AFTER being banned.
They have also been sending all sorts of ominous warnings on my talk page on Wikipedia.
Robert -
Boy, I'm not the only one who's got your number, huh?
Cox Is Dangerous has you dead to rights as do the people who banned you from Wikipedia.
From what I've gathered about you around the web you run the reputation of being a major a--hole who pisses on everything he touches, all the while assuring onlookers that 'I'm making it better!'
Not that I personally hold the above opinion (I just think you're a callous hypocrite), but perhaps this is the reason people don't take you seriously except a few sycophants here at OlbermannWatch?
Just asking.
O'Reilly Rules -
'Once you brought up the race issue I said it was personal! Evry post I do will mock and insult you until I get an apology for pathetic racial remark.'
Since I never brought up any issues of race (except to say that 'white' people don't have to have white skin) so I don't have anything to apologise for.
And your 'mock and insult' campaign is making me all aquiver with fright, Internet Tough Guy.
That fack is your a delusional fraud and I will hound your every post.
The following statement you made:
"Since I never brought up any issues of race (except to say that 'white' people don't have to have white skin) so I don't have anything to apologise for."
Is proof of your racism. You're implying that any Hispanic who is Rightwing isn't a real Hispanic. That's a racist argument. Who are you to decide who a real Hispanic. There are Hispanic with white skin, so ignorance shows!You're a very ignorant paranoid man!
I'm getting sick of Terrorist supporters like youInternet Coward!
Hey about that rumor that Karl Rove is cloning super troopers on the moon?
O'Reilly Rules -
'That fack is your a delusional fraud and I will hound your every post.'
Yawn.
'You're implying that any Hispanic who is Rightwing isn't a real Hispanic.'
Uh, actually, I never made any such distinction, implied or not.
You will never understand what I'm talking about until you realize that the 'white' I'm referring to has less to do with the color of one's skin than the content of one's character.
'You're a very ignorant paranoid man!'
C'mon, Internet Tough Guy, you should know by now that attempting to project your qualities as being mine has no effect.
'Hey about that rumor that Karl Rove is cloning super troopers on the moon?'
Again, you have some fairly outrageous information about Karl Rove that I've not come across.
But, suffice to say that I wouldn't put anything past that despicable bastard.
O'Reilly Rules -
'That fack is your a delusional fraud and I will hound your every post.'
Yawn.
'You're implying that any Hispanic who is Rightwing isn't a real Hispanic.'
Uh, actually, I never made any such distinction, implied or not.
You will never understand what I'm talking about until you realize that the 'white' I'm referring to has less to do with the color of one's skin than the content of one's character.
'You're a very ignorant paranoid man!'
C'mon, Internet Tough Guy, you should know by now that attempting to project your qualities as being mine has no effect.
'Hey about that rumor that Karl Rove is cloning super troopers on the moon?'
Again, you have some fairly outrageous information about Karl Rove that I've not come across.
But, suffice to say that I wouldn't put anything past that despicable bastard.
"But, suffice to say that I wouldn't put anything past that despicable bastard."
Frost the fact you believ something like this shows your stupididty and paranoa.
I'm not even going to wast my time on a piece of pathetic slime like you!
"But, suffice to say that I wouldn't put anything past that despicable bastard."
Frost the fact you believ something like this shows your stupididty and paranoa.
I'm not even going to wast my time on a piece of pathetic slime like you!
Wikipedia is a joke and one of the huge reasons Glennpedia.com was created for Glenn Beck. Wikipedia got so bad that people who actually listen to the show were banned from contributing. Now we all moved to Glennpedia and have the ability to expand the wiki beyond a single article.
Up until last night, the response to my brilliant, detailed analysis of why the Keith Olbermann entry is massively not-NPOV (not neutral point of view) has been stony silence. Suddently my old pals D-Day and Spaghetti Legs responded - but to my critique. Instead the did the old "attack the messenger" routine.
Ironically, D-Day did something productive. He writes:
"I figured that this was the same person who runs(ran?) OlbermannWatch. That makes me sick. Tell you what, I'll put up a request for a Peer Review and get this mess straightened out. --D-Day
Now the article bears a note at the top:
"The neutrality of this article is disputed. Please see the discussion on the talk page."
Score "1" for the good guys!
This comment thread is now closed.