Is Richard Wolffe now Olby's permanent co-host? He's been getting multiple segments quite frequently. I'm sure John Dean is seething with jealousy.

Guess what. Cable news is a business. How long can this caricature of a news related network continue to exist with these dismal ratings? Do advertisers actually pay for exposure on this channel?

Oh and by the way, KO is bottom of the barrel.

Someone pull the plug on this loser network.

CABLE NEWS RACE
MON., MAY 22, 2006
VIEWERS

FNC O'REILLY 2,105,000
FNC HANNITY/COLMES 1,666,000
FNC GRETA 1,494,000
FNC HUME 1,341,000
FNC SHEP SMITH 1,215,000
CNN KING 885,000
CNN DOBBS 702,000
CNN BLITZER 592,000
CNN COOPER 590,000
CNN ZAHN 527,000
CNNHN GRACE 487,000
MSNBC HARDBALL 471,000
MSNBC OLBERMANN 406,000

You forgot to mention the 25-54 demographic. You know, the ones that actually spend money and buy stuff? And I'm not talking garage sales and flea markets. Olby came in second. Nice try though.

To: hit_escape.

Hey, dumbass, what math are you using to get to second place in this demo?

Just curious.

The Scoreboard: Monday, May 22
25-54 demographic:

Total day: FNC: 236 | CNN: 140 | MSNBC: 91 | HLN: 76 | CNBC: 57

Primetime: FNC: 304 | CNN: 172 | MSNBC: 79 | HLN: 106 | CNBC: 42

5p: 6p: 7p: 8p: 9p: 10p: 11p:

FNC Gibson: Hume: Shep: O'Reilly: H&C: Greta: O'Reilly:
233 293 316 322 330 259 374

CNN Blitzer: Dobbs: Blitzer: Zahn: King: Cooper: Cooper:
133 193 189 133 184 200 192

MSNBC Hardball: Abrams: Hardball: Countdown: Scarborough: Cosby: Situation:
88 102 174 135 59 42 55

HLN HLN: Prime: Beck: Grace: Beck: Grace: Showbiz:
82 29 86 86 87 144 119

CNBC Kudlow: Cramer: Money: Made: Cramer: Deutsch: Made:
76 81 79 38 53 35 45

So in your mind, you are only a valuable citizen for 29 years. 18-24 year olds spend no many at all and folks over 55 never make large purchases.

The numbers don't lie. No matter how hard you spin them.

HAHA. He's 15th in his own precious 25-54 demo. Too funny!

I meant he was second at 8 PM.

Hang around with my parents for awhile. They haven't bought anything new since they retired. Doesn't really matter I suppose. Wall to wall viagra commercials on O'Lielly adds up to some pretty nice revenue.

Olbermann tries so hard to skewer O'Reilly but it's so painful to watch. That Dixie-chic segment was so absurd because nobody knows for sure what the exchange was like between the Bill and Natalie Maines. Ole Bushy-eyebrows gloats "she got em good" w/o really knowing anything. The entire story was nothing but his warped, speculation. Nice try dork-boy.

Btw, don't you love the stupid opening to "Countdown" where Olby say's "which of these stories will you be talking about tomorrow?"

Ummmmmmmmmmmm...none. Nobody watches the show!

You are such a fucking lunatic. Whoever runs this site should be shot. I would love to see you executed you scum bag. I hope you hey cancer and die.

What kind of a diseased psychopath believes some fuzzy old evangelist is worse of a human being than a baby-killing terrorist? It’s NUTS!

And at the end of a day, what has Keith Obermann earned himself? A roomful of sneers from his radical left-wing viewers. And apparently, to Keith Obermann, that’s worth being in last place night after night, year after lonely year.

"Btw, don't you love the stupid opening to "Countdown" where Olby say's "which of these stories will you be talking about tomorrow?"

Are you crazy? No matter if I'm at work or school all I hear about is people talking about the CIA leak.

I wonder what Kooky Keith is going to do when he finally comes face to face with O'Reilly say in a restaraunt somewhere? Ut Oh! I would love to see O'Reilly knock his frigging running lights out for him. With all of the cheap personal attacks, Kooky would dererve it. O'Reilly is too much of a gentleman to do soemthing like that. Keith Olberman, you truly are a troubled human being. MSNBC continues to lose credibility keeping your "last place" show on the air.

I LOVE the Olbermaniac's response to this site. In this short thread we already have:

"You are such a fucking lunatic."

"Whoever runs this site should be shot."

"I would love to see you executed you scum bag."

"I hope you hey[sic] cancer and die."

What I love the most is what this says about Krazy Keith. His show is a more subtle and more poorly written version of the listed comments, and attracts people filled with the same anger.

Hey "hit_escape," if 100,000 viewers between 25 and 54 make you a rousing success, then almost EVERY SHOW ON TV is a success. Sorry, but Keith's numbe4rs are horrible.

As for people between 55 and 65, they have all the money and spend it on cars and big screen TV's. Ever notice the commercials that run during golf tournaments? Compare those to the commercials during basketball (a young person's sport). Car commercials vs. Coke commercials.

Much like the liberal teachers who redefine success in the classroom, so the Olbyites redefine success in the Newsroom. Soon, Olby will get points just for showing up! Look for this soon:

"Olby does his show 5 days a week, while wingnut O'Liely only does his show 4 days a week! 5 is greater than 4! Keith WINS!"

The moonbats inhabit his show
It's no wonder the ratings are low
The kooks will come out
To hear Keith rant and pout
And tell lies that habitually flow

Tonight, Krazy Keith prefaced one of Meltdown's stories with the term "garbage journalism". What a hoot. Shouldn't that be the standard disclaimer for his entire show?

Meltdown is journalistically horrible
The host is sophomoric and deplorable
The guests are pure loon
That echo Keith's tune
Most find it extremely abhorrable

Keith having a show is incomprehensible
And his bias is indefenseble.
But that didn't stop the true believers,
The liars and the deceivers,
Who themselves were reprehensible.

I'd like to thank histrung....er, I mean Alec Baldwin for checking in. Just more proof that the left has nothing worthwhile to post and that America is becoming more and more fed up with the left every day.

I was watching ABC news last night ( don't ask me why. I think I lost a bet or something.) Good for Elizabeth Vargas for reporting about the corruption of Cong. William Jefferson, Democrat, Louisiana....... 20 minutes into the broadcast! Again, the culture of corruption within the Democratic party is truly mind boggling.

Fox News is less conservative than ABC is liberal.
Fox News is less conservative than CBS is liberal.
Fox News is less conservative than CNN is liberal.
Fox News is less conservative than NBC is liberal.
Fox News is less conservative than MSNBC is liberal.

He's the beady-eyed host with a man-tan
His viewers include about one fan
His show's not rated highly
Nightly bitch-slapped by O'Reilly
Spewing lies is "pulling an Olbermann"

Keith having a show is incomprehensible
And his bias is indefenseble.
But that didn't stop the true believers,
The liars and the deceivers,
Who themselves were reprehensible.

Oh man that sucked. P-Hew!

Gonna spray some lysol at my screen.

"Fox News is less conservative than ABC is liberal.
Fox News is less conservative than CBS is liberal.
Fox News is less conservative than CNN is liberal.
Fox News is less conservative than NBC is liberal.
Fox News is less conservative than MSNBC is liberal."

Crack is bad for you. It distorts your view of reality. Do too much and you spew shit like the above.

Sean Hannity Sucked on my balls.
and bill o'reilly still plays with his dolls.
but that's not as bad,
As Lou Dobbs licking his dad,
while cry'n bout immigrantion laws

If Anonymous and Histrung are typical of Olbermann's audience, age demographics don't matter.

These two losers couldn't get a job at McDonald's. They will never have any spending power.

Anonymous and Histrung are typical of Olbermann's audience, age demographics don't matter.

These two losers couldn't get a job at McDonald's. They will never have any spending power.

you are a moron.

Guess what? I know who will be Keith's guest tonight. Her name is Shannon Baldon, and according to TV Newser, O'Reilly "lied" about why the ACLU gave her a scholarship. So I'm sure Keith will award her "best person in the world" status tonight, and she'll forever be a hero in his eyes: http://www.courier-journal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060524/COLUMNISTS08/605240391 .

But after reading the story, the bottom line is that O'Reilly was right. Not that that would matter to Keith or to Newser.

Missy,

Keith will never do "best person in the world" for a few reasons:

1. He is a bitter angry man who wants to dwell on the negative. He could care less about the best people in the world. His news stories are negative (conspiracy theories, hatred of Bush, the NSA, Halliburton etc.). His "entertainment" stories are negative (hatred of Tom Cruise, celebutards and the like). His sports stories are negative (Barry Bonds, steroids, etc.). What a 180 he would have to pull to have a "best person" segment.

2. In Olbyville, WPITW is always a republican / conservative / libertarian not because of bias but because they are inherently somehow evil. I think Olby considers himself righteous for "exposing" these people.

3. Blue Blogs would not respond as well to him. We all know the wacky lefties aren't "for" anything -- they just know what they hate.

Anonymous, how about some examples of Fox's bias instead of junior high level smart ass comments that no doubt got you beat up on more than one occasion.

There once was a nameless poster
Who's life was a sad roller coaster.
He would troll on this site,
Scream and howl in sheer fright.
Just another gutless, loony left boaster.

Kalamitous Keith should be very proud of the clear thinking displayed by his merry little band of tools who take up for him here. Very proud.

If anybody is interested in watching something funny ( besides Countdown ) I suggest they watch a hilarious anti-Fox News movie called " OutFoxed." You'll get inside the minds of the haters out there, plus there's a good chance you'll laugh so hard, you'll Olbermann in your pants.

There once was a dork named Fegan
whose mom fucked and sucked Ronald Reagan
she said "What an honor and Delight
Mr. president my Rear end is so tight
Please give me a golden shower I'm beggin'

"Anonymous, how about some examples of Fox's bias instead of junior high level smart ass comments"

Your one to talk.

that no doubt got you beat up on more than one occasion

I would pimp slap your ass.

In Secacus, there's no need to revel
In a show that can't reach a nice level.
So for those who still care
Why his show's on the air
It's quite clear that he's owned by the devil.

Will someone please tell me why a magnificent animal such as Barbaro might be put down ( God forbid, even with surgery ) and yet the big, clumsy, nasty horse with a swayback and flies hovering around it ( I'm speaking, of course, of Countdown ) hasn't been shipped off to the glue factory yet?

Preview of tonight's show - Opie spins the Jefferson scandal so that it's the Bush administration's fault. FBI raid yet another Bush admin violation of **th amendment, another horrible act - and poor Jefferson...

There once was a foul mouthed lefty
Who was full of shit, and therefore quite hefty.
He'd watch Keith every night
Then crap his pants with delight.
But his weekends were not quite as zesty.

Dude, my mom WISHES she did Ronald Reagan, believe me! And you better believe that I'd be bragging about it to all my friends. Are you kidding me? Banging the greatest president the USA has ever seen is quite an honor. If you were trying to insult me, you should have went with Bill Clinton or Jimmy Carter, who are tied for the worst president the USA has ever had. Later, tool.

Patrick was caught by pimp
Who beat him and gave him a limp
Oh please Please sir let me be.
And I’ll you pay a handsome fee.
But he was beaten and re-named the gimp

Dude, my mom WISHES she did Ronald Reagan, believe me! And you better believe that I'd be bragging about it to all my friends

I'm sure you would

There once was a man called Anon
Who thought he could outsmart Fegan
But Patrick was quicker
Anon a bullshitter
"Anon",said Patrick,"be gone"

The once was a man name bill
Whd had absolutely no skill
his post was so bad
I wish his momma had had.
an abortion causing little pill

Notice how lefties love to try to offend and insult people by inferring that they engage in homosexual activities? Like Anon did a few posts above? Then the leftie will turn right around and defend homosexuals and their homosexual activities as normal. Make up your mind Anon. Is homosexual activity like you described above good or bad?

You can bet you sweet asses that the deplorable Keith Olberman and his staff are stting their reading and posting on this website while they all chuckle back and forth like little junior high school kids. I have it through a very reliable inside source (who is leaving shortly) that this is exactly what is happening. (A tell all to follow in the very near future he assures me)

Notice how conservaives like to dish it out but can't take it back.

"Notice how lefties love to try to offend and insult people by inferring that they engage in homosexual activities? Like Anon did a few posts above?"

take your own medicine.

Then the leftie will turn right around and defend homosexuals and their homosexual activities as normal. Make up your mind Anon. Is homosexual activity like you described above good or bad?

Neither good or bad. just an activity that seems to scare the hell out of the right. So much so they wish to legislate against it. I think it is because many of you are in the closet.

"Chuckle back and forth like little junior high school kids.." I hope this wasn't meant to imply that they are somehow laughing down at those of us who see the CD staff for what they are: extremely bitter, biased, and under achieving. If they are indeed reading and posting on this site, maybe they should stop and do some actual research on the stories they give KO to read. Then maybe (a reach, I know) the quality of the show would improve.

BTW another member of KO's staff jumping ship, huh? Go figure.

HAHAHA

they are somehow laughing down at those of us who see the CD staff for what they are: extremely

Why would the do that to people who post such wonderful limericks? I am sure they see you for the worldy sophisticated folk you are. In no way shape or form could they possibly look upon you as inbred hillbillies with a third grade education.

Ok lets be honest. they do.

Kenneth Blackwell

http://video.lisarein.com/election2004/msnbc/11-29-04/
(fourth one down)

Now we know why Repugs don't go on Keith (they are invited, BTW, what political show would be stupid enough to not invite the ruling party on their show), they'll leave wearing their ass for a hat. Much better to go on MTP where they can spout ANYTHING they want and not get called on it. That is unless you're a liberal: those libs got some 'splainin' to do about their hearts and all that bleedin' they do! Same goes for Tweety, Bill-O, and Man-Boy (Stephanolpolousssssss)!

By the way cyber-idiots: the "voice" that Keith does when quoting Bill-O is a pretty good Ted Knight impersonation... you know, "Mary Tyler Moore Show", played an idiotic, full of himself newscaster... Come on kids - things did happen before 1980! Ok, Ok... he was the a--hole judge in Caddyshack. Is that better?

I love this site: limmerick as political satire - you guys probably found "Pogo" funny too... no, that happened before 1980 as well...

Hey there anonymous, a question for you. If you're in the forest with dirty pictures of Keith Olbermann and you scream with girlish glee but no one's around, do you still get grounded by your mom for stealing your dad's pictures?

So you think you would pimp slap me, huh? Then I would punch you like the Cubs catcher punched that dude from the White Sox. I win. Tool.

There once was a no name turd
Who had the marks of a left wing nerd.
He thought his posts were top drawer
But instead were quite poor.
'Cause with him, reality's blurred

Countdown is on life support
" No hope of recovery " says the report.
But Kaplan won't pull the plug
On the man with the orange mug.
Keith remains his network's big wort.

Oh, and Anonymous, you might want to look into a little something called punctuation before you wax on about 3rd grade educations. I'm sure you can do that and fondle you Olbermann blow up doll at the same time.

Bill, you honor me with your limerick. Fight the good fight.

Fox News is less conservative than the other networks are liberal.

Fox News is less conservative than Keith Olbermann is orange.

Fox News is less conservative than anonymous is cowardly, gutless, and spineless.

Anonymous, if you see Keith tonight ( in the group shower maybe? ) tell him I said hello and to have a great show, mmmkay?

Chemist, surely you jest. The kowardice of Krazy Keith is legendary. He proudly says that having opposing views on his show, " adds nothing to the national discourse, plus it makes me queasy." A more embarrassing quote I've never read, and that includes Anonymous! No, Keith has no one on who doesn't toe the line of the politburo. The only reason why a conservative would turn down an appearance on Keith's illustrious program would be that nobody would be watching. But the prospect of a sure win ( destroying Keith with the facts ) would be too sweet to pass up. Think of USC playing North Dakota State Tech A&M University in football. Truly a slaughter of Reagan vs. Mondale proportions. Late.

"Hey there anonymous, a question for you. If you're in the forest with dirty pictures of Keith Olbermann and you scream with girlish glee but no one's around, do you still get grounded by your mom for stealing your dad's pictures?"

Ah, what wit. I actually only scream with girlish glee when spanking your father.

"So you think you would pimp slap me, huh? Then I would punch you like the Cubs catcher punched that dude from the White Sox. I win. Tool."

I know I would pimp slap you, because you are, and always shall be, my bitch.

I don't follow baseball by the way, so I missed that reference. I spend my spare time reading. You should try it. it is fundamental you know.

"There once was a no name turd
Who had the marks of a left wing nerd.
He thought his posts were top drawer
But instead were quite poor.
'Cause with him, reality's blurred"

there once was a man who couldn't rhyme.
he was quite the puke and a slime.
he tried to ryhme drawer with poor
he did this because he's a boor.
he should quit and become a mime.

Countdown is on life support
" No hope of recovery " says the report.
But Kaplan won't pull the plug
On the man with the orange mug.
Keith remains his network's big wort.

Keith is a An infusion of malt that is fermented to make beer? or did you mean wart?

Oh, and Anonymous, you might want to look into a little something called punctuation before you
wax on about 3rd grade educations."

So should you.

"I'm sure you can do that and fondle you Olbermann blow up doll at the same time."

I spend my spare time fondling your mother. She's quite the little freak. Did you hear Ronald Reagon Peed on her?

"Bill, you honor me with your limerick. Fight the good fight."

Aww that's so cute!

Fox News is less conservative than the other networks are liberal.

I have not stopped rolling around on the floor and laughing, long enough to respond to this yet.

Fox News is less conservative than anonymous is cowardly, gutless, and spineless.

I think someone's a little upset. Whose an angry conservative? Whose an Angry Conservative? You are right. Woof! Woof!

Keith is the best and the rest sucks, got that you Bill O' Reilly whores

I think I've figured out balless..... er, I mean

Anonymous. He-she is either an assistant to the big ass himself, KK, or he's one of life's little, sad, pathetic throw-aways who is still not over molesting himself as a young, assexual tool. So, so sad. How am I your bitch, gutless? Is it because of your wonderful posts that put me in my place? Help me out here. I'm well aware that Ronald Reagan peed on my mother. She had the presence of mind to save it and it's now in a ming vase on our mantle. I'm also aware that you have about a gallon of Keith Olbermann's jizz in your stomach and that can't be good for anyone. Remember, man does not live on Keith's semen alone.

I'm not suprised you don't like baseball. It's a manly sport and eunuchs don't seem to gravitate toward such endeavors. I've gotta tell ya, it's great having balls, dude. Something tells me you're no stranger to balls though and I just think that's FABULOUS!

Believe me, dumb dumb, I'm not an angry conservative. After all, what's there to be angry about. We got the presidency, the house, the senate, the supreme court is looking good, we got most of the governorships, the state houses and senates, Fox News is #1 on tv, Rush, Hannity, Laura Ingraham are dominating talk radio, conservative books are selling like crazy. I must admit, life is good. We conservatives will leave the hissy fits to leftists such as yourself.

Whenever you do stop laughing about my thesis that Fox is less conservative than the other networks are liberal, I would love to hear a response. I mean, you can only buy yourself so much time.

And to you, dear Sara. Do you blow Anonymous with that mouth?

Poor Keith had a creepy, weird stalker
Who fancied himself the smooth talker.
He'd send a fragrant bouquet
Every other Wednesday
Then hide naked and aroused in Keith's locker.

Anonymous, is it true that you borrowed your friend's Time magazine with Keith Olbermann on the front, then promptly returned to said friend..... with the pages stuck together?

What kind of world do we live in where Terri Schindler is starved to death over a 13 day period, yet a show that has been in a persistent vegetative state from its' birth is allowed to wallow and waste away for all to see. Mr. Kaplan, it's time to do the humane thing and put Countdown to sleep. You won't haveto do it by yourself. The proprietors of and visitors to Olbermann Watch would be more than happy to volunteer for the job. Thank you for your time, sir.

The left has sent Keith on a quest.
It's too bad that he's opposite the best.
For, you see, on Fox News
Where they air all the views
Mr. Bill kicks Keith's arse with great zest.

Sara:

You wrote..."Keith is the best and the rest sucks, got that you Bill O' Reilly whores"

Sara:

Quit wasting our time. Your statement has no value and contributes nothing to the political discourse this site was meant to engage.

Sara:

You wrote..."Keith is the best and the rest sucks, got that you Bill O' Reilly whores"

Sara:

Quit wasting our time. Your statement has no value and contributes nothing to the political discourse this site was meant to engage.

Patrick Fegan would you possibly be referring to Terri SCHIAVO???????? Gee, did you get something WRONG? I'll bet if Keith had called her Shindler instead of Shiavo, you would be all over him!!

And while you're all at it, give up on the horrible limericks!!! You don't have a clue about rhyming or rhythm.

"I think I've figured out balless..... er"

You figured out your dad? Way to Go Patrick!

"How am I your bitch,"

Because you dress like little bo peep while I smack you around.

I amwell aware that Ronald Reagan peed on my mother. She had the presence of mind to save it and it's now in a ming vase on our mantle.

HAHAHA That sounds about right.

"I'm also aware that you have about a gallon of Keith Olbermann's jizz in your stomach and that can't be good for anyone. Remember, man does not live on Keith's semen alone."

Well you would know.

"I'm not suprised you don't like baseball. It's a manly sport and eunuchs don't seem to gravitate toward such endeavors."

It's a sport for morons. much like yourself.

"I've gotta tell ya, it's great having balls,"

You need to stop visiting the manhole.

dude. Something tells me you're no stranger to balls though and I just think that's FABULOUS!

After all, what's there to be angry about. We got the presidency, the house, the senate, the supreme court is looking good, we got most of the governorships, the state houses and senates, Fox News is #1

So Fox news is conservative? Nice of you to admit that.

on tv, Rush, Hannity, Laura Ingraham are dominating talk radio, conservative books are selling like crazy. I must admit, life is good.

Presidential ratings are around 28%

Whenever you do stop laughing about my thesis that Fox is less conservative than the other networks are liberal, I would love to hear a response. I mean, you can only buy yourself so much time.

You mean respond in sane coherent way? Why would I do that. when in Rome do as the Romans. No I think i will just keep writing stupid limericks. That Seems to pass for analysis around here. besides why respond to such stupidty. Seriously why am I even talking to you. Just fil the tank wash the windows and I'll be one my way.

Anonymous, is it true that you borrowed your friend's Time magazine with Keith Olbermann on the front, then promptly returned to said friend..... with the pages stuck together?

Yes but it was because I used it to wipe the jizz off your moms face. I should had left there though. I mean really that's her problem isn't it?

Keith comes in second during the 8:00? hahaha.

That's like saying Germany didn't lose WWII. They came in second.

Congratulations to Olby ... or is it "Old-y"?

Anonymous and Keith, sittin' in a tree
h-a-n-d-j-o-b.
First comes love, then comes obsession
Then comes Anonymous in a circle jerk session.

Did I say that Fox News is conservative? I don't think I did. I actually believe that they're raging left wingers.

Presidential ratings at 28%, huh? You go on believing that, dummy. Down deep you know that W would win another election if he was allowed to run again. Be honest, tool. Hell, the mainstream media doesn't even believe it. Why do you think they haveto mention Bush's supposed low ratings every second. The more they say it, the more they believe it to be true.

Posting at 3 am, eh, tool. Sucks to be you.

And keep working my parents into your posts. As you can tell, it really upsets me!

Anonymous and Keith were in love
So sweet! Like that of a dove.
For each other they'd reach
Then take walks on the beach.
It was truly the work from above.

Still no response on the whole Fox News thing, huh? Big suprise there. Ok, I'll go first. There's Bill O'Reilly, the #1 show on the #1 cable news network. He's a conservative who has many a lefty on his program. Then there's Hannity and Martian... I mean Colmes. They're the #2 show on the #1 cable news network. That's a conservative debating the liberal guest and the liberal debating the conservative guest. Sounds pretty balanced to me. Then there's Greta Van Susternen, who is a liberal with conservative guests. Then there's Brit Hume, a conservative with liberal guests. Then there's Shepard Smith, who's pretty much down the middle. It goes on and on like that. There are many other part time guests, who, depending on their political leanings, must include those of differing opinions. In other words, the polar opposite of Kowardly Keith. Don't hurt yourself trying to process that tasty information.

Anonymous and Keith were in love
So sweet! Like that of a dove.
For each other they'd reach
Then take walks on the beach.
It was truly the work from above

That Rhymed! First one yet. It's still painfully bad. But hey even morons have to express themselves. I would prefer, if you just stuck to your habitual grunting and scratching but I will give credit where it is due. Good little monkey!

“Still no response on the whole Fox News thing, huh? Big suprise there.

What has there been to respond to? You have chanted:

“Fox news is balanced” (No evidence or reason given)
“Fox news is balanced” (Still no reason behind the argument nor evidence given)
“Fox News is balanced” ( See the above)

“Ok, I'll go first. There's Bill O'Reilly, the #1 show on the #1 cable news network. “

Wow just a dumb as ever. The final American idol took in more votes than the presidential election. By what I assume is your line of reasoning, we can therefore conclude that American Idol is more important than who runs the country. So there we go, the herd has spoken and like a good little sheep you have heeded their word.

"He's a conservative who has many a lefty on his program. Then there's Hannity and Martian... I mean Colmes. They're the #2 show on the #1 cable news network. That's a conservative debating the liberal guest and the liberal debating the conservative guest."

Yeah, Conservative guests seem to out number the liberal ones by something like four to one. Also Colmes is not exactly much of a fighter. A democrat who would go toe to toe with Sean would be more interesting but fox news is probably against that. But honestly I don't give a shit. You can have your network. You can love you network Just admit it is biased.

“Sounds pretty balanced to me. Then there's Greta Van Susternen, who is a liberal with conservative guests. Then there's Brit Hume, a conservative with liberal guests. Then there's Shepard Smith, who's pretty much down the middle. It goes on and on like that. There are many other part time guests, who, depending on their political”

Don’t forgot Fox news Correspondent Newt Gingrich who nightly justifies his radical left viewpoint or that bleeding heart Oliver North or the anti-neocon Bill Kristol.

But assuming that this is all true. (You have offered no proof to your assertions regarding the political affiliation of the Fox personalities.)Your claim has been that Fox news is more balanced than ABC news, NBC news, CNN, and MSNBC, something I find quite laughable. But of course, you didn't even back this assertion up with anecdotal evidence.

“The polar opposite of Kowardly Keith.”

No different than Rush Limbaugh. Keith's show is a show that provides a different side to the debate. Something, I'm sure you are against. His show is biased sure. But so is most what comes out of Fox news; the places Republicans go to get themselves a press secretary.

“Don't hurt yourself trying to process that tasty information.”

I wouldn’t worry much about me hurting myself arguing with you. The only danger of that ever happening is if someone drops an Anvil on my head while I type a reply this nonsense.

Anonymous and Keith were in love
So sweet! Like that of a dove.
For each other they'd reach
Then take walks on the beach.
It was truly the work from above

That Rhymed! First one yet. It's still painfully bad. But hey even morons have to express themselves. I would prefer, if you just stuck to your habitual grunting and scratching but I will give credit where it is due. Good little monkey!

?Still no response on the whole Fox News thing, huh? Big suprise there.

What has there been to respond to? You have chanted:

?Fox news is balanced? (No evidence or reason given)
?Fox news is balanced? (Still no reason behind the argument nor evidence given)
?Fox News is balanced? ( See the above)

?Ok, I'll go first. There's Bill O'Reilly, the #1 show on the #1 cable news network. ?

Wow just a dumb as ever. The final American idol took in more votes than the presidential election. By what I assume is your line of reasoning, we can therefore conclude that American Idol is more important than who runs the country. So there we go, the herd has spoken and like a good little sheep you have heeded their word.

"He's a conservative who has many a lefty on his program. Then there's Hannity and Martian... I mean Colmes. They're the #2 show on the #1 cable news network. That's a conservative debating the liberal guest and the liberal debating the conservative guest."

Yeah, Conservative guests seem to out number the liberal ones by something like four to one. Also Colmes is not exactly much of a fighter. A democrat who would go toe to toe with Sean would be more interesting but fox news is probably against that. But honestly I don't give a shit. You can have your network. You can love you network Just admit it is biased.

?Sounds pretty balanced to me. Then there's Greta Van Susternen, who is a liberal with conservative guests. Then there's Brit Hume, a conservative with liberal guests. Then there's Shepard Smith, who's pretty much down the middle. It goes on and on like that. There are many other part time guests, who, depending on their political?

Don?t forgot Fox news Correspondent Newt Gingrich who nightly justifies his radical left viewpoint or that bleeding heart Oliver North or the anti-neocon Bill Kristol.

But assuming that this is all true. (You have offered no proof to your assertions regarding the political affiliation of the Fox personalities.)Your claim has been that Fox news is more balanced than ABC news, NBC news, CNN, and MSNBC, something I find quite laughable. But of course, you didn't even back this assertion up with anecdotal evidence.

?The polar opposite of Kowardly Keith.?

No different than Rush Limbaugh. Keith's show is a show that provides a different side to the debate. Something, I'm sure you are against. His show is biased sure. But so is most what comes out of Fox news; the places Republicans go to get themselves a press secretary.

?Don't hurt yourself trying to process that tasty information.?

I wouldn?t worry much about me hurting myself arguing with you. The only danger of that ever happening is if someone drops an Anvil on my head while I type a reply this nonsense.

Ok, ok, you got me. I'm actually a plump, pathetic, pimply-faced Natalie Maines look-alike 13 year-old girl. :(

Anonymous, you are a font of misinformation.

Item: Newt Gingrich is not a Fox News correspondent
Item: He does not appear nightly.
Item: Conservatives do not outnumber liberals by 4 to 1
Item: Alan Colmes is more of a liberal than ANYONE who appears on Countdown is a conservative
Item: Keith's show is biased.

Oops, how did that get in there. You got one thing right!!

Item: Newt Gingrich is not a Fox News correspondent

I have seen him introduced as such. perhaps he no longer is. I haven't watched Fox news in over year. not worth the time.

Item: He does not appear nightly.

Granted.

Item: Conservatives do not outnumber liberals by 4 to 1

I seen a study Inidcating that to be the case on what grounds do you assert the opposite.

ANYONE who appears on Countdown is a conservative
Item: Keith's show is biased.

No more so than the factor, or Rush Limbaughs's show. Course I doubt they bother much spreading your right wing agenda.

> I have seen him introduced as such. perhaps he no longer is.

You are either mistaken or lying. He was never a Fox News correspondent.

> I seen a study Inidcating that to be the case

Oh, well then it must be true. Never mind citing the study or its methodology or findings. You saw a study, so case closed.

> on what grounds do you assert the opposite.

On the grounds that you made the claim and haven't proved it. The burden is on the accuser to back up claims. It's not on the doubter to prove an unfounded charge isn't true. That ball is in your court.

> Keith's show is biased. No more so than the factor, or Rush Limbaughs's show.

You are correct that Limbaugh's program is biased. But it's a TALK SHOW, not a NEWS HOUR. Olby pretends to be a newsman reporting news, and he's really doing an hour of spin and propaganda, just like Limbaugh.

As for the Factor, let's take the NSA surveillance issue. Keith Olbermann has had almost a dozen guests on opining about this issue. Every last one of them took the same viewpoint: it's unconstitutional, it's against the law. Bill O'Reilly's guests on this issue have argued both sides: legal, illegal, constitutional, and un. So who is biased here, and who isn't? Or are you going to seriously claim that Mr Bill giving air time to both sides of an issue is bias, but KO only allowing the side he agrees with to be presented is not?!?

You are either mistaken or lying. He was never a Fox News correspondent.

On Bill Oreilly's Web page he is called "Fox news Analyst newt Gingirch".. So Fine he is analyst not a correspondnet. My point was that Newt is a regualr contributor to fox news. We they get ted Kennedy to become a Fox news Analyst and put him on as often as Newt I will consdier the network fair and balanced.

> I seen a study Inidcating that to be the case

"Oh, well then it must be true. Never mind citing the study or its methodology or findings. You saw a study, so case closed."

I will look it and cite it. I didn't know I was in court of law or I would have had my facts handy. so I will look it up. Since we are in court however I would like to see some of the proof you have on Olbermann. Show me that a conservative has never appeared on his show. Name the 12 or so that agree with him on the NSA issue, also if you could name the date that they appeared that would be handy and why you think they are liberal in their viewpoint. Lets just go ahead and agree that all your claims are untrue until then. I see you cite it.

> Keith's show is biased. No more so than the factor, or Rush Limbaughs's show.

You are correct that Limbaugh's program is biased. But it's a TALK SHOW, not a NEWS HOUR. Olby pretends to be a newsman reporting news, and he's really doing an hour of spin and propaganda, just like Limbaugh.

Blah. the only reason you picked him is that he is a liberal talking head.

"As for the Factor, let's take the NSA surveillance issue. Keith Olbermann has had almost a dozen guests on opining about this issue. Every last one of them took the same viewpoint: it's unconstitutional, it's against the law. Bill O'Reilly's guests on this issue have argued both sides: legal, illegal, constitutional, and un. So who is biased here,"

Shouting down anyone who disagrees with him dosen't show his bias. that makes alot of sense. So what he has a liberal on once in a while that porves nothing about Bill. Btw since we are in court if you name the 12 and explain what was biased about them i will accept then. Until then lets just assume it is untrue.

" and who isn't? Or are you going to seriously claim that Mr Bill giving air time to both sides of an issue is bias, but KO only allowing the side he agrees with to be presented is not?!?"

So fucking what? I am not arguing that he dosne't have people on his show to shout at I am arguing the Bill has a very obvious conservative bias.

hello?

> We they get ted Kennedy to become a Fox news Analyst and put him on as often as Newt I will consdier the network fair and balanced.

They have David Corn, Wesley Clark, Ellen Ratner, Eleanor Clift, Neal Gabler, to name just a few. If your point is that Newt is the only analyst on Fox News then you are incredibly ignorant.

> if you name the 12 and explain what was biased about them i will accept then.

Well I'm really going to lose sleep if you don't "accept" them. We did a run-down on this site of all his NSA guest experts. What was biased about them is that Every One of Them took the same point of view. Not one spoke to the other side of the issue. If the facts aren't good enough for you, I'm not surprised. You defend Olby after all.

>I am not arguing that he dosne't have people on his show to shout at

How many of those people did he shout at? Can you name them?

> I am arguing the Bill has a very obvious conservative bias.

And I will argue that Olby has a very obvious liberal bias. The difference is Bill let's the other points of view be heard. Olby doesn't. Q.E.D.

Oh Boy.

> We they get ted Kennedy to become a Fox news Analyst and put him on as often as Newt I will consdier the network fair and balanced.

They have David Corn, Wesley Clark, Ellen Ratner, Eleanor Clift, Neal Gabler, to name just a few. If your point is that Newt is the only analyst on Fox News then you are incredibly ignorant.

My point was that I see Newt's face far more than I see that of the others. I don't don't deny that Fox throws out a token liberal now and then to keep up appearences.

"Well I'm really going to lose sleep if you don't "accept" them. We did a run-down on this site of all his NSA guest experts."

Then re-post them because I missed it. i have no intention of accepting any evidence on your word.

"What was biased about them is that Every One of Them took the same point of view."

What point of view? perhaps you wouldn't mind giving a quotation or two? Or even managing to paraphrase one of their arguments. So I have something to respond to? Take your time. I honestly don't expect you to have all this handy.

>I am not arguing that he dosne't have people on his show to shout at

"How many of those people did he shout at? Can you name them?"

I have posted just as much evidence of you have. I find it amusing that you back none of your assertions then complain because I have not. I will spend some time tonight posting my evidence I ask you to do the same. Oh and are you really asserting that Bill dosent' shout down his guest. I'll get back to you when I am done laughing.

> I am arguing the Bill has a very obvious conservative bias.

"And I will argue that Olby has a very obvious liberal bias. The difference is Bill let's the other points of view be heard. Olby doesn't. Q.E.D."

So you are fine with Bill Shouting down those who disagree with him. You are fine with his talking point memos that advocate a conservative viewpoint. You are fine with his bias basically as long as he has a guest liberal on once a month or so?

And please spare me your whine this is a keith Olbermann cite. I am repsponding to what you wrote.

Posted by: johnny dollar at May 25, 2006 05:16 PM

> My point was that I see Newt's face far more than I see that of the others.

I see Olbermann's face more than I see anyone else on MSNBC. I don't use that "evidence" to claim he is a spokesman for the network, or that everyone else appears once a month. I am not that deranged.

> Oh and are you really asserting that Bill dosent' shout down his guest.

OK, name one guest this week he has shouted down. Let's make it easier. Include last week as well. Who exactly got shouted down?

> What point of view? perhaps you wouldn't mind giving a quotation or two?

I do that every night. I'm not going to do it all over again for each of Olby's Parade of Sycophants because you don't know how to use a search box. As I said, I'm on leave this week. I'm not even here!

> You are fine with his talking point memos that advocate a conservative viewpoint.

Oh like the ones about oil companies gouging people on gas prices? Or the one about why gay adoption should be permitted? Or the ones about why we need stricter environmental controls? THOSE conservative viewpoints? AT least Mr Bill labels his commentaries and doesn't toss in phrases like "phony war" as if it were straight news reporting.

You know little about O'Reilly because you obviously don't watch his program. You get all your information from hearsay sources and probably couldn't even say WHAT his position on the NSA programs IS. You are attempting to distract from Olbermann's great failings by using the "tu quoque" fallacy against Bill O'Reilly. That doesn't work with me.

Response below.

"I see Olbermann's face more than I see anyone else on MSNBC. I don't use that "evidence" to claim he is a spokesman for the network, or that everyone else appears once a month. I am not that deranged."

I see we have a reading issue here. Lets look at the part of my original post that you are ignoring.

>>> But assuming that this is all true. (You have offered no proof to your assertions regarding the political affiliation of the Fox personalities.)Your claim has been that Fox news is more balanced than ABC news, NBC news, CNN, and MSNBC

I wrote the above in my argument with Fegan. After I wrote that he had left out Oliver North (Bleeding heart.) Bill Kristol ( Anti-neocon) and Newt. who I mistakenly lumped in with the other Fox news Correspondents. So no I don't think Newt is the face of Fox news.

"OK, name one guest this week he has shouted down. Let's make it easier. Include last week as well. Who exactly got shouted down?"

I didn't watch his show last week. i have watched it regularly in the past though and saw that behavior quite often. I suppose if I really wanted to I could bring out old tapes to prove my point but i will do that when you do bother provding some evidence of your own.

"I do that every night."

Every night you post alot of drivel that usualy maounts to alot of name calling and silly logical fallicies.

Why should I do your research for you. You keep bitching about me not citing a study or giving specific examples but you refuse yourself to do so.. I love your hypocracy.

"Oh like the ones about oil companies gouging people on gas prices? Or the one about why gay adoption should be permitted? Or the ones about why we need stricter environmental controls? THOSE conservative viewpoints? AT least Mr Bill labels his commentaries and doesn't toss in phrases like "phony war" as if it were straight news reporting."

Wow John Good job. You found three viewpoints that run counter to the average right winger. on the factor no less! If I find three from keith can we conclude that he is not biased?

"You know little about O'Reilly because you obviously don't watch his program."

I watched it every day for over a year in 2004 and 2005. I later stopped when I got sick of Television. But I think that is long enough to get a good sense of a talking head.

"You get all your information from hearsay sources"

Like what?

"You are attempting to distract from Olbermann's great failings by using the "tu quoque" fallacy against Bill O'Reilly. That doesn't work with me."

Nice little strawman there. a tu quoque fallacy would be if I claimed you should accept The Olbermann is wonderful postion, because Bill's position is just as bad.

I don't remember arguing anything of the sort. I simply have accused you of not minding bias as long as it is a conservative who is practicing it.
You asserted this:

"And I will argue that Olby has a very obvious liberal bias. The difference is Bill let's the other points of view be heard."

Which implies that you are fine with bias as long as it has one distinct element, which is having a guest from the opposing party on. You however don't mind if the other three fourths of the show are spent arguing a conservative agenda.

Have a nice day.

> I wrote that he had left out Oliver North (Bleeding heart.) Bill Kristol ( Anti-neocon) and Newt. who I mistakenly lumped in with the other Fox news Correspondents.

Neat. Kristol and North aren't Fox News Correspondents either. You really know what you're talking about, don't you? Then you say you didn't watch Mr Bill last week. A few sentences later, you claimed you stop watching it last year. I'll take this as an admission that you can't point out any guest shouted down by Bill this week or last.

> You however don't mind if the other three fourths of the show are spent arguing a conservative agenda.

If it is arguing a conservative agenda, that means that there is a liberal agenda there too or there would be no argument. Yes, that is balanced programming. It doesn't exclude points of view that disgree with the host. There are more liberals on O'Reilly in one week than there are conservatives on Olby in one year.

this is interesting.

"I'll take this as an admission that you can't point out any guest shouted down by Bill this week or last."

Wow good work Sherlock. When someone says, "I didn't watch the show last week" You jump in with that razer sharp mind and point out that it must mean they didn't notice anything about the show last week. You did that all by yourself too!

Now of course it completly ignores the fact that I watched the show consistently for year and a half and witnessed Bill shouting down guests on several occasions. but I guess that matters none because I can't name an occasion that occured last week.

"If it is arguing a conservative agenda, that means that there is a liberal agenda there too or there would be no argument."

what!? So we then can conclude Keith has no liberal agenda by that line of reasoning. if what you claim is true.

"Yes, that is balanced programming. It doesn't exclude points of view that disgree with the host."

So by that line of slendid logic If a liberal is on the factor once a year the show is completly balanced. What definition of balance are you using?

"T"here are more liberals on O'Reilly in one week than there are conservatives on Olby in one year."

That of course would excuse any bias on the factor. He does it a wee bit less than Keith so he is OK.

I'm pretty sure all my limericks have rhymed, dumb dumb...... I mean Anonymous. You have a clear case of limerick envy, which is much like testicle envy, a couple of things you're no doubt familiar with. So, I've provided no evidence that Fox News, the #1 cable news network, is more balanced than the other networks? I beg to differ, tool. Bill O'Reilly has just as many liberal guests as he does conservative ones. Feel free to disprove me by doing a headcount yourself. That is if you can count properly. I happen to think that Alan Colmes acquits himself quite well on his #2 show on the #1 cable news network. Explain to me how he is a lame rep for the liberal side. He's a formidable debater and keeps the conservative guest on his toes. Or do you just not like the fact that he lowers himself to be seen in public with Sean Hannity? Truly, tool, what is it about Fox News that irritates you so? Is it their crawlers they run on the bottom of the screen with news headlines? Are there right-wing messages in those? Are Greg Jarret, Bill Hemmer, Trace Gallagher, and others mouthpieces for the Bush administration? Here's your assingnment for tonight, tool. Go to the official Fox News website and click on their contributors. Then get a pen and write down all the leftists that are on its' payroll. Got that, tool? You know, I could agree to disagree and say that bias is in the eye of the beholder. But I would be lying. This is pretty objective. Stuff. What's your opinion of CNN? Are they too conservative for you? Starting at 8 at night, it's Paula Zahn, Larry King, and Anderson Cooper. All of them are liberal by any objective standard.
But just so I understand you correctly, Fox has a definite conservative bias, but the other networks have zero bias? Is that it? No bias for Dan Rather, who tried to torpedo both George Bush's presidencies, only to leave in disgrace himself? No bias on his part when he lied about George W. Bush's national guard record and then refused to have the swift boat veterans on to voice their concerns about John " 3 whole months in Vietnam" Kerry? No bias on ABC the last couple of days as they reported, in spite of the Justice Department saying the opposite, that Dennis Hastert was the subject of the Abramoff investigation? How about Catherine Crier, a former substitute anchor for ABC, who was booed lustily as she said the Bush administration is creating a police state in America at a college commencement. How about the mainstream media being positively giddy about Tom Delay stepping down, yet they say the bare minimum about William Jefferson. I'm sorry, Bob Schieffer, what political party does Jefferson belong to?

Here's the reason why you and other haters despise Fox News. It gives conservatives a legitimate platform from which to speak, not just a token soundbite that can be taken out of context. They broke the unwritten rule of the old networks by doing that and it has revolutionized newscasting and has the tired, beaten, defeated networks reeling. By the way, plenty of Clinton goons are working in or previously worked for the media? How about Georgie Snuffalopagous.

Finally, it's funny that when Bill O'Reilly tars and feathers a liberal, he's accused of shouting him down. Apparently, a liberal has never lost to a conservative in a debate. They've only been shouted down. So, dummy, have I provided enough anecdotal evidence for you.

Patrick you stay out of this. The adults are talking.

> I watched the show consistently for year and a half and witnessed Bill shouting down guests on several occasions.

Hmm let's see. A year and a half = 78 weeks, or 390 shows. And you saw Bill shouting someone down "several" times. Several: adj - more than two but not many. Great case you're making there.

> That of course would excuse any bias on the factor. He does it a wee bit less than Keith so he is OK.

Is there something wrong with your reading comprehension? I said there are more liberals on the Factor in one week than conservatives on Olby in one year. Is that a "wee bit less" bias? Here's a hint: it's not bias at all. It's both sides being represented week after week, while Olby lives in his own little bubble where only the toadies are permitted to speak, and opposing points of view are banned.

Anonymous, I accept your concession.

Anonymous, I accept your gracious concession.

Wow here we go again

"Hmm let's see. A year and a half = 78 weeks, or 390 shows. And you saw Bill shouting someone down "several" times. Several: adj - more than two but not many. Great case you're making there."

fine I meant to say repeatedly. Just so there is no lack of clarity here. I saw it a multitude of times. I witenessed it often. Almost daily.

"Is there something wrong with your reading comprehension? I said there are more liberals on the Factor in one week than conservatives on Olby in one year. Is that a "wee bit less" bias?"

So again, by that line of reasoning it is OK when the Factor does it as long as it is not done as often?

" Here's a hint: it's not bias at all. It's both sides being represented week after week, "

here's a hint: you are misunderstanding bias.

Bias A) preference or an inclination, especially one that inhibits impartial judgment. ( shouting down a liberal applies here)
B)An unfair act or policy stemming from prejudice. ( this would be having more conservative viewpoints than liberal and yes even if he does it once a week.)

Since we are being strick and all about that definiton thing.

"Yes, that is balanced programming. It doesn't exclude points of view that disgree with the host"

This is an incorrect use of balanced.

balanced: A state of equilibrium or parity characterized by cancellation of all forces by equal opposing forces

while Olby lives in his own little bubble where only the toadies are permitted to speak, and opposing points of view are banned.

"Anonymous, I accept your gracious concession"

Oh Patrick, that's so cute! no i'm sorry you have to make an argument before anyone could possibly concede to it. I know you want to play so bad. but don't worry, as soon as the adults are done playing I promise I will respond to your sily little ravings. In the meantime, be happy and know that in honor of Ronald Reagan I gave your mom a golden shower last night.

Actually, Anonymous, mom said that you had a little problem last night. Something about " this has never happened to me before."

Why are you withdrawing your concession? Don't go and pull an Al Gore in Florida on me now.

Anonymous, Fox News is less conservative than the other networks are liberal. Please respond. You've had more than enough time to look up the lefty talking points by now. Either respond or re-extend your concession.

P.S. Mom told me you looked like a Ken doll " down there."

"Anonymous, Fox News is less conservative than the other networks are liberal."

Says who? Now when you get around to making an argument call me back.

P.S. Mom told me you looked like a Ken doll " down there."

I am hung at that.

Anonymous, only someone who has, shall we say some shortcomings, would tell another dude that he's hung. I'm sure Keith told you that you are, but I'd get a second opinion. I'm gonna go with my mom on this one.

Listen, coward, I've given you plenty of examples of Fox's fairness and the other network's left wing tilts. Now it's your turn, dummy. But I understand why you won't respond. There are none so blind as those who will not see. I guess what I'm trying to say is that I accept your second and hopefully final concession, you drama queen.

I met a fool i' the forest,
A motley fool.

"Anonymous, only someone who has, shall we say some shortcomings, would tell another dude that he's hung"

Well You'd be the expert on that.

"I'm sure Keith told you that you are, but I'd get a second opinion. I'm gonna go with my mom on this one."

She's happy as long as she gets her golden shower.

"Listen, coward, I've given you plenty of examples of Fox's fairness"

No you haven't. You have made alot of unsubstantiated claims though.

Here is an example

"Bill O'Reilly has just as many liberal guests as he does conservative ones"

Now just pulling things out of your dumb ass dosen't count as an argument.

"and the other network's left wing tilts. Now it's your turn, dummy. But I understand why you won't respond. "

I didn't respond because your post was incoherent.

"There are none so blind as those who will not see. I guess what I'm trying to say is that I accept your second and hopefully final concession, you drama queen."

Oh Patrick you silly goose. Once doesn't concede when one has won. Now Go back to playing with you Tonka trucks and stop throwing these little temper tantrums. You lost it's over it's final. Now the thing to do for you is go read a book. I would start with the little engine that could or something similar and maybe one day if you work really hard you will be capable of reading a whole novel with no help from your mom. Which means you won't get of my pee pee on your lips anymore when you kiss her cheek at the end of a story.

Anonymous, whatever would you do if you couldnn't include exerpts from my posts in your, hmmmm? Your little offerings would be about 90% smaller.

Please oh please stop with the golden showers and my mother. It bothers me greatly.

You seem obsessed with golden showers. I'm guessing you're quite familiar with some nasty pornography. The really bad kind. Not Gay. Not animal. I'm talking gay, animal porn.

You can try and retract your latest concession, but this time, I'm holding you to it.

As far as being hung, dude, anybody looks like that next to his pet gerbel.

Okay, Patrick you win. I am the lamest leftist to ever post on this site, and that says a lot! I tried to work in your mother and call you a child but neither one worked. I was just stalling because there was no way in hell I could offer any proof that Fox News was biased. Please forgive me, my master. I apologize for everything and please accept my humble concession. I will now return to that cool place under the rock from which I crawled. Once again, you win, I lose.

That took a lot of guts, Anonymous. I didn't think you had it in you. Good luck in the future under that rock of yours.

Patrick. Just because you can't beat me in real life is no reason to go and falsify what I have written. it makes you look dishonest.

"Anonymous, whatever would you do if you couldnn't include exerpts from my posts in your, hmmmm? Your little offerings would be about 90% smaller."

And 100% less funny

"Please oh please stop with the golden showers and my mother. It bothers me greatly."

I'll stop when your mom has had enough.

"You seem obsessed with golden showers. I'm guessing you're quite familiar with some nasty pornography. The really bad kind. Not Gay. Not animal. I'm talking gay, animal porn."

How do you think I met your mom?

"You can try and retract your latest concession, but this time, I'm holding you to it."

You are confused as always.

"As far as being hung, dude, anybody looks like that next to his pet gerbel."

Ahh but I look large next you.

Patrick. Just because you can't beat me in real life is no reason to go and falsify what I have written. it makes you look dishonest.

"Anonymous, whatever would you do if you couldnn't include exerpts from my posts in your, hmmmm? Your little offerings would be about 90% smaller."

And 100% less funny

"Please oh please stop with the golden showers and my mother. It bothers me greatly."

I'll stop when your mom has had enough.

"You seem obsessed with golden showers. I'm guessing you're quite familiar with some nasty pornography. The really bad kind. Not Gay. Not animal. I'm talking gay, animal porn."

How do you think I met your mom?

"You can try and retract your latest concession, but this time, I'm holding you to it."

You are confused as always.

"As far as being hung, dude, anybody looks like that next to his pet gerbel."

Ahh but I look large next you.

That was an enlightening post, Anonymous. But I hardly believe that it was worth the double posting billing you've given it.

Your posts would be much funnier if you just re-posted mine. I give you my permission to do just that.

Anyway, mom sends her best and says that the two of you can work out your " little problem." Actually, she said tiny problem.

That was an enlightening post, Anonymous. But I hardly believe that it was worth the double posting billing you've given it.

"Your posts would be much funnier if you just re-posted mine. I give you my permission to do just that."

Well sure stupidity is always funny and you of course are a complete and total moron.

Anyway, mom sends her best and says that the two of you can work out your " little problem." Actually, she said tiny problem.

Shee likes pee

"That was an enlightening post, Anonymous. But I hardly believe that it was worth the double posting billing you've given it."

Anything worth saying is worth saying twice.

"Your posts would be much funnier if you just re-posted mine. I give you my permission to do just that."

Of that there is no doubt. Everytime I read your moronic ravings I can't help but roll on the floor laughing. The best part is when you think you have proven something but offer neither logic nor facts to back up what you think you have proven. It really cracks me up because you are so proud of writing something so stupid.

"Anyway, mom sends her best and says that the two of you can work out your " little problem." Actually, she said tiny problem"

hey sometimes I can only pee once a day. What can I do? The bitch has an isatiable appetite for piss.

Listen here, Anonymous. My mother has been very supportive of you, first through your decision to castrate yourself, then through your gay, animal porn days. But she'll be damned if she's going to stay with a " man " who makes a pigeon look hung. So go ahead and spring for the surgery already! Oh, and when I posted as you, it was funny and original. When you posted as me, it was unfunny, unoriginal, and more than a little sad.

Oh, and when I posted as you, it was funny and original. When you posted as me, it was unfunny, unoriginal,

Patrick, Patrick, Patrick. Gosh kind of sound like your sister don't I? You remind me of the dweeb from good morning Vietnam who kept loudly proclaiming he is funny but never shows a trace of wit. My post was much more amusing than yours, complete with literary references and everyhting. If you need I wil be happy to explain them to you. I'm sure that your not much of a reader and that's ok to quote your favorite movie (Caddyshack) The world needs ditch diggers as well. Although, in all fairness I do see a strong Dr. Seuess influence in your Limericks. Is the cat in the hat still your favorite book?

I'm sorry George. I saw a little bunny rabiit and I wanted to hold him an' sqeeze him and call him Johnny Dollar. George I'm sorry for rapin' my sister George. We could see her again George. ‘We’ll go to her,’ an’ we would. Jus’ milk the cow and sling some grain to the chickens an’ go to her. I won't tell no one George and If you need I will have the sheep George.

Posting for a second time as me? Classic Loser.

I'll once again accept your concession and move on. Good luck cleaning the jizz of your tv screen that seems to accumulate there between 8 and 9 pm on weekday nights.

My offer still hasn't sailed regarding you not being able to prove that Fox News, the #1 cable news network, fair and balanced, the most trusted name in news, the network that is less conservative than the other networks are liberal, has a right wing bias. Time is ticking, tool.

Seriously, though, how many times do I haveto say that I accept your concession? Stop conceding already.

Patrick you should be flattered. When I posted as you, I mingled Shakespeare and Steinbeck in the post. That's far better than the bad Doctor Seuess stuff you normally do.

I'll once again accept your concession and move on. Good luck cleaning the jizz of your tv screen that seems to accumulate there between 8 and 9 pm on weekday nights.

Oh Patrick I know you want to win so bad you can taste it (much like my pee when you kiss your mama's lips) but you never made an argument just baseless accusations. I win.

"My offer still hasn't sailed regarding you not being able to prove that Fox News, the #1 cable news network, fair and balanced, the most trusted name in news, the network that is less conservative than the other networks are liberal, has a right wing bias."

Now Patrick, the burden of proof is on you. I'll disprove you when you actually throw out something besides a baseless claim.

I win again

Mom tells me that she dumped you weeks ago. Apparently, the incessant masturbation to Countdown, apart from leaving a nasty film on your tv screen, is now making you blind. I have a feeling that the woman you've been pissing on has been your mommy all along, not mine. Ouch!

Which Shakespeare is your favorite?" Anonymous' MidSummer's Night Wet Dream About Keith Olbermann" perhaps?

I gutted you long ago, little fish, so I'll just regard any future postings by you as the involuntary movements of a fish that's just had it's head chopped off. Toodle-loo, tool.

Don't be saying things like that you ungrateful little shit. Anonymous has the best pee I've ever had. You know it's true! you have drank it! You ungrateful little brat! that does it! From now on I am going to stop giving you doggie poo in your cereal.

Don't be saying things like that you ungrateful little shit. Anonymous has the best pee I've ever had. You know it's true! you have drank it! You ungrateful little brat! that does it! From now on I am going to stop giving you doggie poo in your cereal.

Anonymous I love you!