Hear, hear Robert.....notwithstanding these crackpots' right of habeus corpus!

All we want is for the people who were claiming that KO was making the whole thing up or did it himself to get attention to apologize for their outrageous comments.
To those people: YOU WERE WRONG! Now do you have the stones to admit it?

And if you think those were amusing, just wait until you see his posts on Free Republic. Apparently this guy was Katherine Harris's biggest fan, and he couldn't resist commenting at least a few times about the letter sent to Olbermann and a few others like it--which might have been how the FBI nabbed him.

And as for this Braun guy as well--what's the deal with California? :)

All we want is for the people who were claiming that KO was making the whole thing up or did it himself to get attention to apologize for their outrageous comments.
To those people: YOU WERE WRONG! Now do you have the stones to admit it?

Posted by: Anonymous at November 13, 2006 12:27 PM

It will never happen. WRONG? They are never wrong. cecelia has never been wrong about anything. STONES? Don't have any. Never believe otherwise.

Anonymous said: "All we want is for the people who were claiming that KO was making the whole thing up or did it himself to get attention to apologize for their outrageous comments."

And all WE want is for Olbermann to apologize for everything HE makes up. When Olby does his part, we'll do ours.

You are obviously mentally challenged. All the conspiracy mongering was meant to prove a point -- that Keith's lies are infuriating. So how do you like being on the receiving end there champ?

I will never apologize! How do you like that dopey? In fact, I STILL THINK KEITH DID IT TO HIMSELF! That's right, despite the new evidence, I remain unconvinced. Perhaps Keith read about the threats to other real celebrities and sent the letter to himself? After all, how did this person get Keith's home address? I mean, this is as clear to me as the obvious Democrat voter fraud in the last election.

People,

There is evidence that Keith staged all of this himself. While he claims to have gotten the item of mail at HOME, all others received the letters at places of work. In addition, there were no fingerprints OTHER THAN KEITH'S on the letter. In addition, Keith refused to discuss the matter. Now why was that?

We all know Keith desires attention, but is this the way to get it?

Keith has spread any and every fear among us in a desperate effort to avoid that which he most fears — some check, some balance against what has become not an imperial, but a unilateral voice on the airwaves. And now it is evident that it no longer matters to him whether that effort to avoid the judgment of the people is subtle and nuanced or laughably transparent.

Olbermann sent the letter to himself, and everyone now knows it.

And why do you so conveniently happen to leave out his long-time posting at freerepublic.com and exposetheleft.com ?

Is it because there his writings are largely indistinguishable from your rants?

C'mon admit it, he's one of your buddies. A full-fledged member of the wingnut brigade.

And why do you so conveniently happen to leave out his long-time posting at freerepublic.com and exposetheleft.com ?

Is it because there his writings are largely indistinguishable from your rants?

C'mon admit it, he's one of your buddies. A full-fledged member of the wingnut brigade.

Excuse the double post. Your server is sending an error message.

I will never apologize! How do you like that dopey? In fact, I STILL THINK KEITH DID IT TO HIMSELF! That's right, despite the new evidence, I remain unconvinced. Perhaps Keith read about the threats to other real celebrities and sent the letter to himself? After all, how did this person get Keith's home address? I mean, this is as clear to me as the obvious Democrat voter fraud in the last election.

Posted by: KfK at November 13, 2006 01:02 PM

You are obviously deranged and you need to remember to pick up you prescriptions.

For those Olbermann apologists who are demanding an apology from "them".....here it goes.....

I am sorry.

Grammie, to her credit, will not need to apologize...

(Referring to the Anthrax hoax)

For the record this type of thing is,and SHOULD BE, not only illegal but unacceptable to everyone. I wouldnt excuse this as a prank between juveniles who knew each other.

It accomplishes nothing and is costly to society. This type of thing takes away from our ability to fight real terrorism and crime.

That being said, I thought KO was out of line ridiculling O'Reilly for his statement to B Walthers.

Janet Hawkins
AKA Grammie

Posted by: Janet Hawkins at September 27, 2006 08:19 PM

Go Grammie!

No Anonymous,

I use Keithian logic in all of my posts. Evidence is easy to come by. Just open your eyes and you will see it. THERE, RIGHT THERE -- IT JUST WENT BY!

No, Mister Anonymous, nay, SIR anonymous, it is obvious that Keith Olbermann sent the letter to himself, and you misread my post.

Indeed, sir, you are far more stupid than the worst of your critics might suggest; that you could not follow the construction of a simple sentence; that you could not recognize Keith's own sordid story when it was deftly summarized; that you could not perceive it was the sad ledger of your compatriot Olbermann that was being recounted.

Hey uh Janet...this is real terrorism. The fact that it was unsuccessful just means that murder charges will not be added.

The goal of terrorism is to achieve one's political goals through the use of an action that induces fear and intimidation.

Don't excuse him just because he's one of your rightwing buddies.

An open letter to liar Keith Olbermann:

You instructed no one to mail the fake letter, Keith. Nor undermine the FBI's case. Nor call for the execution of the people who dared question the timing of the "threat". Nor beat up a man yelling at a box of lettuce at the supermarket. Nor have the first English muffin of the day before Katy. Nor tell the now accused "letter mailer" to lie about how the parcel managed to make it to your HOME ADDRESS.

No, you did not.

And the genius of the thing, is the same, as in King Henry's rhetorical question about Archbishop Thomas Becket: "Who will rid me of this meddlesome priest?"

All you have to do, sir… is hand out enough new canes.

Indeed, sir, MISTER Keith Olbermann, you are no better than the muck from whence you dragged your bloated and evil corpus.

And from his frantic ravings, KfK sounds like a buddy of Chad's too.

Indeed, sir, you are far more stupid than the worst of your critics might suggest; that you could not follow the construction of a simple sentence; that you could not recognize Keith's own sordid story when it was deftly summarized; that you could not perceive it was the sad ledger of your compatriot Olbermann that was being recounted.

Posted by: KfK at November 13, 2006 01:30 PM

You talk too much and say too little all the time. Olbermann is great. The country agreed with him and not your fringe fanatical group of out of the mainstream and very shrill losers.

For those Olbermann apologists who are demanding an apology from "them".....here it goes.....

I am sorry.

Grammie, to her credit, will not need to apologize...

(Referring to the Anthrax hoax)

For the record this type of thing is,and SHOULD BE, not only illegal but unacceptable to everyone. I wouldnt excuse this as a prank between juveniles who knew each other.

It accomplishes nothing and is costly to society. This type of thing takes away from our ability to fight real terrorism and crime.

That being said, I thought KO was out of line ridiculling O'Reilly for his statement to B Walthers.

Janet Hawkins
AKA Grammie

Posted by: Janet Hawkins at September 27, 2006 08:19 PM

Go Grammie!

Reich-wingers are terrorists. Fact.

No, Keith didn't mail the letter. As with all the other nefariousness and slime of this, our worst television show since "the Al Franken Show" he is having it done for him, by proxy.

Consider the timing: the very month the campaigns would be raging and show the Bush administration to be the success it is—not a fertilizer for terror, but a check on it.

The kind of proof of incompetence, for which Olbermann and his hyenas at MSNBC need to find a diversion, in a scapegoat.

It was the kind of cheap trick which would get a journalist fired—but a propagandist like Olbermann promoted:

Promise to talk of the news of the day; but instead launch into the lies and distortions with which the Authoritarians among us attack the virtuous and reward the useless. Yes, Olbermann has betrayed us all. He has been the director and actor in his own little play. The rest of us are dupes.

Thank you Cee. I am still waiting with bated breath for those apologies from KO and his fans for ridiculing B O'Reilly as a liar and a fraud for mentioning his terrorist threat.

One would think that the fine examples of manhood trolling this site would have the courage that they claim exclusive ownership of to step up and fess up.

That is, if they can drag themselves away from their primary goal in life: assualting women who disagree with them.

EVILLY AND STUPIDLY YOURS,

Janet Hawkins

Posting mad and evil drivel. Ask any KO fan.

But Janet, the FBI said they had never heard of the threat B O'Reilly was talking about. Are you calling the FBI liars too?

This guy only sent stuff to left wingers.. the first act of the new senate should be to put this guy under a prison.

I have heard that Olbermann will be indicted for his role in "fake anthrax lettergate." New evidence points to a copy cat crime committed by Olbermann and an accomplice to garner sympathy from his audience and to slander conservatives. Expect indictments this week.

And Janet, as an O'Reilly fan, do you really want to be talking about assaulting women? Or don't falafals count? Or just assaults by O'Reilly don't count?

Ed wrote: "And why do you so conveniently happen to leave out his long-time posting at freerepublic.com and exposetheleft.com ? Is it because there his writings are largely indistinguishable from your rants? C'mon admit it, he's one of your buddies. A full-fledged member of the wingnut brigade."

Not sure what the heck Ed is talking about here. I found one comment on Expose the Left and published it above so I am hardly leaving it out. I am not terribly familiar with Free Republic. I went there based on the comments here and searched for the guy but found nothing. If you have some additional information about Castagana then please post it.

I have no problem saying that the guy is a right-winger. He is also a nutcase and jerk who deserves to be in prison. From the sounds of it he is well on his way.

As for Kfk and others who continue to beat Keith up over this, I am going to have side with the OlbyLoons on this one. My advice to you it to admit your wrong, take your lumps and move on.

Geez,, I am sure glad that I never sent some of the letters that I have addressed. However,, the voodoo dolls seem to work well. I stuck a pin in Dubya's head and just this weekend a guy pushed a wax figuerine of Dubya over crushing his head.

Mr. Cox,, on behalf of all politicos who visit this site thank you for not running this site like a iron fisted general. With the abundance of blogs available it is nice that we have a place where we can read other peoples thoughts and not just get bombarded with one thought process. Bravo.

Mr. Cox,

Get with the program. It was never about really believing that Keith sent the letter to himself. It was about responding to the situation in an Olberrian fashion. In other words, in Olbyland, do what Olby would do.

Ed, O'Rielly has never said a word to me. What he does with others is not justification for the ahem 'men' on this site.

I would like you to answere a few questions for me.

Does the fact that Bill O was accused of harassment and made a settlement justify what actions by other men?

Is it acceptable for KO fans to call me "mad barbaric c**t, an inbred whore or leer about
"planting his seed in me".

If so, because I disagree with them and deserve my fate.

Or, how about them saying these things to your mother, wife and daughter. Is it OK still? Is it OK only if your recalcatrant women disagree with them. Or, maybe it is OK for you to treat them that way?

And, do you think any of them would say these types of things to my face? Say them in person if any of the men in my life were present? Or only in a private place where they can slither off and congratulate themselves on a courageous act well done.

Or do you castigate only the first person who does it? A rather elastic moral code.

J Hawkins

Grammie,

Leave Ed alone....he needs to wash the windows on his glass house.

Janet-

No, that language is not acceptable by posters here or by O'Reilly.

I haven't seen that language used here since I am not a regular, I only visited because the site came up on Memeorandum and your comment about 'men' here seemed to include me, which I objected to. Snarky is fine, foul attacks are not.

Mr. Cox, Castagna has been traced by multiple duplicate postings to the pseudonym Marc Costanzo at freerepublic.com where he basically makes threats about sending 'Ted Kosinski' type letters to Olbermann and then comments on the news stories. From his profile, he seems to have been inspired by Ann Coulter:

http://www.freerepublic.com/~marccostanzo/

Oh boy....I knew it.....here it goes.....just like the other liberal cries to suspend The First Amendment in the name of public safety, crazy Chad is not at fault, it's COULTERGEIST!

Is this a trial ballon for WPIW, Ed?

Don't know what WPIW is but do remember Ann Coulter joking about sending Anthrax to the New York Times.

And who said anything about stopping her from saying anything? But you should know who your audience is. If it's full of conspiracy nuts, they might just take your jokes seriously.

"It will never happen. WRONG? They are never wrong. cecelia has never been wrong about anything. STONES? Don't have any. Never believe otherwise."

Obviously you're right once in your life, anyway.

Ed, if that was an apology I accept. But I ask again. What does Bill O saying anything to women have to do with acceptable and unacceptable behavior by others.

You seem to advance that argument with the first line of your post:

===================
No, that language is not acceptable by posters here or by O'Reilly.
==================

I wonder why you made an immediate leap from my comment, that you acknowledge was based on ignorance re why I said it, to defend KO by denigrating Bill O.

And did you read anything today by me to lead you to the conclusion you made?

EVILLY AND STUPIDLY YOURS,

Janet Hawkins

Posting mad and evil drivel. Ask any KO fan.

Now you know why I close most of my posts the way I do. If you feel like a swim through the slimed bowels of many of the ahem 'men' KO fans just go back and peruse some earlier comments.

Worst Person in the World.

Ann Coulter AND Keith Olbermann know their respective far-wing audiences very well. IMHO, blame the mailer, not the pundit.

Don't know what WPIW is but do remember Ann Coulter joking about sending Anthrax to the New York Times.

And who said anything about stopping her from saying anything? But you should know who your audience is. If it's full of conspiracy nuts, they might just take your jokes seriously.

WPIW?....see above

I've taken conservative after conservative to task for pointing out that the rhetoric from Al Qaeda is utterly identifical to the left's rhetoric about the war and about President Bush.

Not fair...sez....I... They may give some small measure of comfort to terrorists...but that's moot and not their intent or fault...unlike terrorists, the left's words don't carry an implied threat......sez I...........

Now here Olbyloons are blaming the right for the profound and earth-shattering discovery that any race, group, or nation can unwittingly harbor crazies in its midst.... and that sometimes just someone voicing an opinion is all the incentive they need to do crazy crap...

They ALWAYS fail to amaze me... and they always....make you regret defending them....

Ed, there you go again. I feel like we have a new and improved Codas in our midst.

=====================
And who said anything about stopping her from saying anything? But you should know who your audience is. If it's full of conspiracy nuts, they might just take your jokes seriously.
====================

The only conspiracy nuts on this site are those same gentlemen we discussed earlier.

The only satire and spoofs you will read on this site are from the OW fans.

And the most innocent comment that people should moderate their tone is met with deafening howls that you want to shred the constitution and shut them up.

OW is NOT Henry II and KO Thomas a Beckett.

Would still like a response to my post @ 3:13 PM

EVILLY AND STUPIDLY YOURS,

Janet Hawkins

Posting mad and evil drivel. Ask any KO fan.

Janet,

You should wear the blog-board insults you receive from liberal males calling you a liar and a slut as a badge of honor.

I don't know if you had the penultimate badge of honor yet. That's when the enlightened and progressive liberal male say that you're really a man in drag, the way they so often charge that a male opponents is gay and in the closet.

When you do receive it, wear it proudly.

I'm a veteran here and I wear mine on my jock strap.

Ed,

I suppose you are choosing to ignore that you were wrong in your claim about by not linking Expose the Left, right. And now you tell me that "Marc Constanzo" is the psuedonym used by Castagna based on "multiple duplicate postings". Do you have a SOURCE for that or just tossing around theories?

I read the link you provided and skimmed comments from "Marc Constanzo" and found these..

FNC Breaking - Suspicious White Powder Found in Clinton's Harlem Office -nothing follows
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1727261/posts

Comedian or politician? “It’s complicated” with Al Franken (Free Republic mentioned/quoted)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1719494/posts

Powder found at US senator's office (Schumer by way of mail)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1731981/posts

"I heard recently that The Washington Post got interrupted beifly the other day becaue of a 'suspicious letter' . I read about this at Wonkette.com. They said that this letter only contained harmless powder of Boric Acid ."

I suppose there is more but I am not going to keep reading back - there are many, many posts from "Marc Constanzo".

Assuming you can provide some proof, I don't think ANYONE who knows this political internet space would be surprised to learn that a Freeper was involved.

Regarding the Anthrax hoax....

Q: Any comment from Letterman?

A: Not to my knowledge.

Q: Any comment from Rep. Pelosi or Senator Schumer?

A: Not to my knowledge.

Q: Any comment from Stewart?

A: Not to my knowledge.

Q: Any comment from Keith Olbermann?

A: Yes and we'll see if he talks about it tonight on COUNTDOWN.

COUNTDOWN with KEITH OLBERMANN.....Ego driven blather since 2004.

Cecelia, I might qualify for the penultimate badge. I was almost accused of being a 'fat male republican'. That really ticked me off because I still wear a size ten.

But then he changed directions and decided that I was a really old woman who was controlled by my backwater husband. That ticked me off too. Dirt is older then I am.

What do I get with the ultimate badge of honor? Whatever it is, I'll do my best to earn it.

EVILLY AND STUPIDLY YOURS,

Janet Hawkins
AKA Grammie

Posting mad and evil drivel. Ask any KO fan.

"But then he changed directions and decided that I was a really old woman who was controlled by my backwater husband."

Janet, I love it! That's even better than a liberal male accusing you of being in drag!

You're merely a puppet of your husband's! The NEW penultimate insult badge of honor!

So when will the KO Krazies apologize to "Karmabites" for suggesting it was her and were certain her arrest for this alleged crime was immineent?

KfK:

If you don't think KO is a "real" celebrity, why are you wasting your valuable time criticizing everything he does or says?

If you don't think KO is a "real" celebrity, why are you wasting your valuable time criticizing everything he does or says?

Posted by: Mike at November 13, 2006 06:19 PM

Why not?

Where else could I meet so many fine examples of American manhood? :D

The superb arguments, flashes of brilliance and wit. And so many original analyses and insults. :D

KO must beam with pride. The sons he never had.

EVILLY AND STUPIDLY YOURS,

Janet Hawkins
AKA Grammie

Posting mad and evil drivel. Ask any KO fan.

Today AOL misspelled Olby's name in their article about the arrest, LOL.

Mikey wrote:

"If you don't think KO is a "real" celebrity, why are you wasting your valuable time criticizing everything he does or says?"

Mikey, I come by for Johnny Dollar's work. As I have said before, Olbermann is the sand in the oyster. That the oyster sometimes produces a pearl is one of the wonders of nature.

...despite the new evidence, I remain unconvinced.

It's hard to argue with logic like that.

Pug,

That IS OlbyLogic...to that extent KfK has a point.

Meanwhile, I found a couple of "sources" for the Castanga -Constanzo connection and posted an update. Based on what I read it seems that the big blue blogs did not bother to screen grab FreeRepublic.com. I did. And have a couple months worth of the Constanzo posts as well as his profile which is now posted above. In it he expresses his admiration for Ann Coulter, Laura Ingraham and Michelle Malkin.

I've never heard Ingraham or Malkin make jokes about it and I am sure they are not happy about being mentioned in Constanzo's profile. Quite obviously Ann Coulter's "jokes" do have something to do with this. You would expect most people caught in her position (having advocated a terrorist act which a fan then carries out) to keep a low profile. Somehow with Ann Coulter I expect the opposite. I am sure she can spin this as well as anyone but the fact remains that she has SOME culpability here.

Pug,

That IS OlbyLogic...to that extent KfK has a point.

Meanwhile, I found a couple of "sources" for the Castanga -Constanzo connection and posted an update. Based on what I read it seems that the big blue blogs did not bother to screen grab FreeRepublic.com. I did. And have a couple months worth of the Constanzo posts as well as his profile which is now posted above. In it he expresses his admiration for Ann Coulter, Laura Ingraham and Michelle Malkin.

I've never heard Ingraham or Malkin make jokes about it and I am sure they are not happy about being mentioned in Constanzo's profile. Quite obviously Ann Coulter's "jokes" do have something to do with this. You would expect most people caught in her position (having advocated a terrorist act which a fan then carries out) to keep a low profile. Somehow with Ann Coulter I expect the opposite. I am sure she can spin this as well as anyone but the fact remains that she has SOME culpability here.

BTW, I had not seen this...pretty amazing...
http://movies.crooksandliars.com/scarborough-FBom.mov

"I've never heard Ingraham or Malkin make jokes about it and I am sure they are not happy about being mentioned in Constanzo's profile."

On the other hand, both Laura and Michelle have urged harrassment of particular political opponents.

http://movies.crooksandliars.com/scarborough-FBom.mov

Joe did a Christopher Hitchens!

OK, I have waited long enough:

I wrote: "Indeed, sir, you are far more stupid than the worst of your critics might suggest; that you could not follow the construction of a simple sentence; that you could not recognize Keith's own sordid story when it was deftly summarized; that you could not perceive it was the sad ledger of your compatriot Olbermann that was being recounted."

Posted by: KfK at November 13, 2006 01:30 PM

Anonymous wrote this in response: "You talk too much and say too little all the time. Olbermann is great. The country agreed with him and not your fringe fanatical group of out of the mainstream and very shrill losers."

Posted by: Anonymous at November 13, 2006 01:37 PM

Guess what? The words I wrote were OLBERMANN'S! How about that you loonies. Olby's words from his own "specious comments." In fact, if you look at my posts, most of the long-winded, meaningless drivel came from your hero Olbermann. Now, I don't expect you idiots to do a double take -- after all, it doesn't even bother you that terrorists actively root for your team, so why would Olbermann's disgusting behavior raise an eyebrow?

Of course, this entire excercise was aimed at pointing out the flaws of your hero. He invents conspiracy theories preferentially, and lies through his teeth in long-winded, absurd rants.

No, Olbermann did not send the letter to himself. However, had the letter been sent to the President or O'Reilly, your sick hero would declare the acts a "set up." You don't like it when it is done to you, so why do you tolerate it when he is doing it to others?

Lesson over.

"Ed" wrote:

"And from his frantic ravings, KfK sounds like a buddy of Chad's too."

Posted by: Ed at November 13, 2006 01:36 PM

Well, Ed, guess what? You just called Olbermann's "specious comment" a "frantic raving." That's right -- that crazy rant came right out of Olby's snarling lips. So, do you feel like a raging hypocrite?

Ed just inadvertantly said Keith's "specious comment" read like something that Chad, an insane powder-mailing crackpot, would write! You are correct Ed -- the only thing that separates Chad from Olbermann is that Chad had the balls to mail his threat, whereas Olbermann wishes he could act on his hatred.

I love this, it's Olbermann's fault, that's like saying it's OUR fault America was attacked on 911.

Chad "had the balls?" Are you really cheering this jackass on? Think about it, how much in taxpayer dollars were wasted in trying to catch this "ballsy" idiot? If I was a cop or FBI reading this BS-veiled support for this idiot I'd be pissed knowing I was spending time on this jackoff rather than the full-blown terrorists y'all pee your pants about that are hiding in our mailboxes and or you think make up the Democratic party (boy he put the lie to that axiom you've all been mewling the past week.)

Oh and guess what, KO didn't publicize this, the NY Post did it FIRST... get it? Once the cat was out the bag and an investigation possibly tainted did he talk about it. Why are you all not pissed at the Post for giving KO something to get "hysterical" about?

Look, I know y'all have had a VERY BAD WEEK, so I understand the projection and need to blame others. I guess Stewart, Pelosi, Letterman and Schumer were also faking it... and thankfully at the least this jackass didn't have the smarts to make the real stuff, which last time seemed to go to only Dems and media types then as well.

Hey Polyp,

Take a reading comprehension class you dope.

Anon:
Take a reading comprehension class you dope.
Short, sweet, and saying nothing... sounds like a republican mid-term ad... and just as successful and compelling...

rpppolyp,

nice post, except you address none of the points I've raised through this exercise.

You do realize that Olbermann's own words were perceived as "frantic raving" by your bretheren, right? And you do understand that Olbermann accuses the US Government of lying about terror plots, terror alerts, and even the capture of actual terrorists? He accuses individuals like O'Reilly of lying about being the subject of terrorist threats as well.

Now, how about you think about these issues. Nobody is saying Keith is responsible for a lunatic sending him powder. However, his insane conspiracy theories and rants are a sign of a sick mind. Even you Olbermanniacs can see how disturbed it is to blame the victim and accuse the target of some crazed conspiracy (at least when it comes to one of your own), and you can see that Olbermann's rants are crazy (when attributed to someone else), so how about you put two and two together?

Of course you won't!

kfk,

You need some sort of Olbermann Watch award for this one. How you managed the tremendous restraint in waiting for all the petard hoisting to play out, I'll never know.

But Olbermann went on one of his predictable "preachy" tirades taking the Post to task for reporting it yet he himself revealed an aspect of the investigation not previously revealed before in public by the authorities in the report he did last night. Why now is he suddenly exempt from what he was preaching to the Post about exactly? Oh, I forgot, different rules for Olbermann and his followers.

Thank you Cecelia --

I waited as long as necessary -- the attention span of an Olbyloon is somewhere between five and thirteen minutes, and they only read the last ten comments in a thread. I just set the trap and did the math!

By the way, Cecilia, I liked being reminded of the phrase "hoisted by one's own petard." I hope the Olbyloons take the time to look it up.

KfK, if you don't mind my saying so, my kind of man.

You almost caught me. I went back and reread thinking I had heard some of this stuff before. And you didn't sound like yourself.

I am sorry that I thought you had become 'unstable' :D

Janet Hawkins
AKA Grammie

KfK said:

"He accuses individuals like O'Reilly of lying about being the subject of terrorist threats as well."

Gee, the FBI said they knew nothing about O'Reilly's claim - and it was a FLAT DENIAL, not one of those "neither confirm nor deny" stories. O'Reilly claimed that other media types had received similar threats, but all of the networks involved said "this is the first we've heard of this"...

"There you go again" Anonymous! Jusk keep it up!

Hey everybody! Erie Bob back for my periodic checkup on the kookiest klub on the internet! Still going strong I see. Good for you. It has occurred to me that you all probably need this. For all I know you are all in the hospital and are just trying to eek through your days, as I was when I began posting here. If so, keep that chin up! If not, what the ?@#$ are you doing here?

I admit I am surprised on a number of counts. First and foremost, I continue to be amazed that this thing keeps chugging. Especially after the election. You dogs got burnt. Then one of your kind (political-personality-obsessed internet folk) got caught sending fake anthrax letters, after most of you kooks swore up and down Ken Olberman did it to himself. Does any of it daunt you? No. KfK tries to turn it into another zinger against "Olberloons," turning last month's moronic right wing conspiracy theory into this month's rightwing performance art. It's pretty clear that nothing can stop you people from spending your days continually unmasking the continually unmasked. Have you heard that his ratings are bad?! Deeelicious. "I hope he gets a pimple!!"

The other big surprise is, of course, that the learned Cecelia still hangs around here. Angry whiteguys like Kranky f. Kook and Johnny and Mike and BushyWushy are the internet's stock in trade. No surprise there. Likewise, retired grannies aching to bask their over-tanned Republican bodies in the heat of Bush's simplistic incineration of reality are a dime a dozen. True, only a handfull will go so far as to suggest that they actually had the idea to remake the middle east by invading Iraq BEFORE they heard it from captain dumdum and the anti-reality brigades. Not a normal "granny" position. But still, granny you can account for. Likewise Cox, who is similarly un-or-underemployed.

Cecelia, however, is truly a rare breed. She fits no category, generally espouses no real position, doesn't really care about anything, and seems to exist merely for the sake of the ocassional snotty but genteel barb against "lefties." she hangs around this nothing-fest, raking mountains of muck for pearls. And the pearls are really just ordinary rocks that she polishes herself. Yes, that was quite a sublime trick KfK played Cecelia, PRETENDING to create a conspiracy theory just to mock Ken Olberman by imitating how he would act! Brilliant!

Uh-huh. Almost as good as putting up a Hitler face.

Of course it is easier to form a "community" around even the most strange and obscure kinds of opposition than just about any positive vision. But Cecelia even stands a little aloof from this "anti" community. She rarely goes in for the protracted arguments about who has more right to be offended, who said what, etc. She just sits and waits to drop a mean but respectable barb. Cecelia, explain yourself. Quick. In the next 15 minutes.

Otherwise, I'll check back sometime next month. Just to see. I like to watch. (That's your cue. Now you say, "creepy!" and maybe something derogatory about men who vote Democratic.)

P.S. Ken Olberman is a jackass!!

"For all I know you are all in the hospital and are just trying to eek through your days, as I was when I began posting here."

That explains a lot. I hope the psychiatrists get you stablized with thorazine soon, EBO.

P.S. Ken Olberman is a jackass!!

Posted by: Erie Bob Olberloon at November 15, 2006 05:50 PM

---
Who the hell is Ken Olberman?

Keith's second cousin on his mother's side.

GINGRICH: TO PROTECT FREEDOMS, U.S. MAY NEED TO CURTAIL FREEDOMS

-- Fear Based Republo-Fascist Chickenhawks Immediately On Board --

WASHINGTON -- Newt Gingrich, a former Republican speaker of the house mulling a possible presidential run, has said that America may need to reexamine freedom of speech in order to prevent future terrorist attacks. Speaking at the annual First Amendment award dinner in Washington, D.C., Gingrich said that a "different set of rules" should be considered to reduce the ability of terrorists to use the Internet and abuse free speech to get out their message, "The Constitution and Bill of Rights, though certainly well-intentioned, are tragically guilty of pre-9/11 thinking."