Still want to shut down the website afte rthis news

I will bet my last dollar this will be a dog that won't bark tonight!

It will be a dog that won't bark or Olby will give Allard at least one coveted spot on WPITW, if not all three.

I would love to see somebody shove a hot poker up olbermans' ass. Nobody deserves it more than this dishonest creep.

From what I here, Olbyperv would probably like it!

Has Keith been ignoring Levin lately? I think Keith is afraid. Levin enjoys attacking Olbermann just like Olbermann enjoy attacking O'Reilly. Levin has nothing to lose with personal attacks just like Olbermann had nothing to lose with his personal attacks against O'Reilly.

Did Col. Allard address the cowardly comments of TVNewser's Brian Stelter?

Keith is the best human on the face of the planet. If God ever comes back he will look and sound like Keith. Oh,, by the way you dumbasses... Allard very , very seldom ever appeared on NBC in the last year.

Why in the f--- would anyone want to listen to Mark Levin, The only way anyone has heard of Levin is him speaking about KO . Hopefully Brit Hume will get colon cancer real soon.

"Allard very , very seldom ever appeared on NBC in the last year."

Just like people had to tell the insensitive coward Brian Stelter, who never had the guts to apologize: that's because Allard had a stroke.

Joe O'megenle, don't you have some insects hanging around that you can amuse yourself pulling their wings off.

Janet Hawkins
AKA Grammie

Keith is the best human on the face of the planet. If God ever comes back he will look and sound like Keith. Oh,, by the way you dumbasses... Allard very , very seldom ever appeared on NBC in the last year.

Posted by: Bill O'lielly at February 19, 2007 8:24 PM

Why in the f--- would anyone want to listen to Mark Levin, The only way anyone has heard of Levin is him speaking about KO . Hopefully Brit Hume will get colon cancer real soon.

Posted by: Bill O'lielly at February 19, 2007 8:27 PM

The best part of O'lielly ran down the crack of his momma's ass and wound up as a brown stain on the mattress.

Arkin brought up something that is very freighting about NBC news. The fact that the completely ignored Hezbollah attacking Israel. That they ignored the story. How can you consider yourself a legit news organization when you ignore a country attacking one of America's allies? NBC is a disgrace.

GE makes a profit from war
A fact Krazy Keith will ignore
GE makes a "killing"
Deep pockets they're filling
And they use NBC as their whore

Once again, the Talking Billdo's Points DEMANDS!!

YOU HEAR THAT MR. IMMEL!!! AND DAMN YOU BILL GATES!!!

The power of the Billdo compels ya!

The power of the Billdo compels ya!

DAMN YOU G.E.!!!
DAMN YOU MicroSoft!!!
DAMN YOU SECULAR PROGRESSIVES ALL TO HELL!!

And that's the Talking Billdo's memo.

A haiku for all of you Fox lovers:

There once was a mouthpiece named Fox
All of it's 'news' came wrapped in a box
From the President you see
A gift for you & me
Until o'reilly showed Makris his Cock

A haiku for all of you Fox lovers:

There once was a mouthpiece named Fox
All of it's 'news' came wrapped in a box
From the President you see
A gift for you & me
Until o'reilly showed Makris his Cock

Posted by: I had sex with katy turic... & didn't

Three points:
1) That is a limerick, not a haiku;
2) It is horribly written. Line four's meter is badly constructed; and
3) You are a fool.

"Oh,, by the way you dumbasses... Allard very , very seldom ever appeared on NBC in the last year."

Thats because he has been on medical leave fighting cancer, a point conveniently ignored by NBC.

o'lielly you really are a faggot piece of sh-t and as such a typical a--hole liberal- i hope you get AIDS.

o'lielly you really are a faggot piece of sh-t and as such a typical a--hole liberal- i hope you get AIDS.

Now I know my old friends on the left can’t link. But here it goes.

Watching Countdown last night I noticed most if not all the commercials where for pharmaceuticals and or chemical and petroleum companies.

Now Keith gets this big paycheck every two weeks. MSNBC gets its money to pay Keith’s big paycheck from the sponsors of his show.

Soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo. Isn’t Keith “taking money” from Big Corporate America?

I would also assume that Keith cares about his retirement. I wonder does Keith’s retirement portfolio have stocks in “Evil Corporate America”? Maybe he has Halliburton stock like “Fat Boy” did.

Now don’t give me that Cheney and Republicans are in bed with “Evil Corporate America” B.S. They never profess NOT TO BE. Keith on the other hand rails against such things daily.

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm

hypocrite : a person who puts on a false appearance of virtue or religion.
A person who acts in contradiction to his or her stated beliefs or feelings

Olbermann has as much in common with Murrow as a pile of dog sh-t has in common with filet mignon.

You same dumbsh-ts who act like you have respect for Murrow most likely would have been on the side of Joseph McCarthy and his red seeking buddies. Your hypocrisy reeks as bad as the warm pile of sh-t that you call your president.

I don't see how KO can name Allard as WPITW tonight. He's already condemned O'Reilly for "taking advantage of him" because of Allard's ill health. Besides, he seems to want give Levin the same treatment he himself gets from O'Reilly.

A personal note, O'Lielly:

I have sifted through HUNDREDS of your comments in search of ANY sign of intelligent life. Nothing so far.

You same dumbsh-ts who act like you have respect for Murrow most likely would have been on the side of Joseph McCarthy and his red seeking buddies. Your hypocrisy reeks as bad as the warm pile of sh-t that you call your president.

Posted by: Bill O'lielly at February 20, 2007 11:58 AM

I agree. If the RWer's were living in the 50's Cee, Cecilia, Grammie, Benson etc, would be on McCarthy's side and screaming about the liberals being communists.
That one is a no brainer !

Billy.. I know I usually find it very difficult to write down to the people I am speaking to. I am grateful that I have a journalism degree because I can go back to the junior high school level and address the rightwingers.

I was born in the 1970s. Who the hell is this Murrow fellow? Does he host a sports show?

You are communist and so was Murrow. McCarthy was right. The left wing press villified him just like every other conservative.

Get Teheran Keith a Crying Towel...
The Gitmo decision went against him.

"Court: Detainees can't challenge cases"

NBC News IS

Al Jazeera @ 30 Rock.

BooHoo, I guess the "freedom fighters" at Club Gitmo will have to stay there a little longer.

Wait till Scooter Libby get's acquitted and Russert is to blame.... KO may need to be talked off the ledge.

Now [coastal geologist Orrin H.] Pilkey and his daughter Linda Pilkey-Jarvis, a geologist in the Washington State Department of Geology, have expanded this view into an overall attack on the use of computer programs to model nature. Nature is too complex, they say, and depends on too many processes that are poorly understood or little monitored — whether the process is the feedback effects of cloud cover on global warming or the movement of grains of sand on a beach.
Their book, “Useless Arithmetic: Why Environmental Scientists Can’t Predict the Future,” originated in a seminar Dr. Pilkey organized at Duke to look into the performance of mathematical models used in coastal geology. Among other things, participants concluded that beach modelers applied too many fixed values to phenomena that actually change quite a lot. For example, “assumed average wave height,” a variable crucial for many models, assumes that all waves hit the beach in the same way, that they are all the same height and that their patterns will not change over time. But, the authors say, that’s not the way things work.
Also, modelers’ formulas may include coefficients (the authors call them “fudge factors”) to ensure that they come out right. And the modelers may not check to see whether projects performed as predicted.
Eventually, the seminar participants widened the project, concluding that erroneous assumptions, fudge factors and the reluctance to check predictions against unruly natural outcomes produce models with, as the authors put it, “no demonstrable basis in nature.” Among other problems, they cite much-modeled but nevertheless collapsed North Atlantic fishing stocks, poisonous pools unexpectedly produced by open pit mining, and invasive plants and animals that routinely outflank their modelers.
Two issues, the authors say, illustrate other problems with modeling. One is climate change, in which, they say, experts’ justifiable caution about model uncertainties can encourage them to ignore accumulating evidence from the real world.
Hmmm. Scientists actually ignore accumulating evidence from the real world. I wonder how many of the scientists involved in the recent United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report fit this description. The article continued:
But, the authors say it is important to remember that model sensitivity assesses the parameter’s importance in the model, not necessarily in nature. If a model itself is “a poor representation of reality,” they write, “determining the sensitivity of an individual parameter in the model is a meaningless pursuit.”
Given the problems with models, should we abandon them altogether? Perhaps, the authors say. Their favored alternative seems to be adaptive management, in which policymakers may start with a model of how a given ecosystem works, but make constant observations in the field, altering their policies as conditions change. But that approach has drawbacks, among them requirements for assiduous monitoring, flexible planning and a willingness to change courses in midstream. For practical and political reasons, all are hard to achieve.
Besides, they acknowledge, people seem to have such a powerful desire to defend policies with formulas (or “fig leaves,” as the authors call them), that managers keep applying them, long after their utility has been called into question.
So the authors offer some suggestions for using models better. We could, for example, pay more attention to nature, monitoring our streams, beaches, forests or fields to accumulate information on how living things and their environments interact. That kind of data is crucial for models. Modeling should be transparent. That is, any interested person should be able to see and understand how the model works — what factors it weighs heaviest, what coefficients it includes, what phenomena it leaves out, and so on. Also, modelers should say explicitly what assumptions they make.
How does this pertain specifically to global warming?
And instead of demanding to know exactly how high seas will rise or how many fish will be left in them or what the average global temperature will be in 20 years, they argue, we should seek to discern simply whether seas are rising, fish stocks are falling and average temperatures are increasing. And we should couple these models with observations from the field. Models should be regarded as producing “ballpark figures,” they write, not accurate impact forecasts.
“If we wish to stay within the bounds of reality we must look to a more qualitative future,” the authors write, “a future where there will be no certain answers to many of the important questions we have about the future of human interactions with the earth.”
New York Times

More undisputed global warming evidence from that right wing rag, The New York Times. Great Thanks :)

"If the RWer's were living in the 50's Cee, Cecilia, Grammie, Benson etc, would be on McCarthy's side and screaming about the liberals being communists."

Let's see, "why do you care what my name is" thinks that the clear thinkers would be supporting McCarthy style smears? Let's look at some facts:

Olbermann smears those he disagrees with on a regular basis (claims that O'Reilly supports Nazis, endorses the words of a columnist who called our troops "mercenaries", calls a prominent Jewish televison news show host a "monkey"). . . . Check

The Olby sycophants on this board defend KO whenever the clear thinkers point out these objectionable antics. . . Check

This is one of the reasons I check in on this board frequently--- it never fails to confirm the hypocrisy of the loons when it comes to sticking up for thier hero, the mentally ill Orange Boy

It's an abomination that the horrendous treatment of our wounded veterans has gone on without notice for so long. Of course, the injured troops have been dealing with it for some time now….

Download (1096) | Play (871) Download (1061) | Play (511)

Dana Priest does a three minute summation of her column which broke the sad news that our wounded live in a rat and roach infested facility. The word is that once again the people in charge didn't plan for the amount of injured troops and can't handle it. Jon Soltz of VoteVets.org—follows up with Keith and discusses the issue. It's time for some real leadership to get help to the troops. And some real leadership means the readers of C&L. I'm finding out how we can help…I'll keep you posted…

keith olbermann is not married for a very obvious reason.

Talk amongst yourselves....

The best part of Keith Olbermann wound up on the floor of a truck stop rest room in New Jersey.

It's an abomination that the horrendous treatment of our wounded veterans has gone on without notice for so long. Of course, the injured troops have been dealing with it for some time now….

Download (1096) | Play (871) Download (1061) | Play (511)

Dana Priest does a three minute summation of her column which broke the sad news that our wounded live in a rat and roach infested facility. The word is that once again the people in charge didn't plan for the amount of injured troops and can't handle it. Jon Soltz of VoteVets.org—follows up with Keith and discusses the issue. It's time for some real leadership to get help to the troops. And some real leadership means the readers of C&L. I'm finding out how we can help…I'll keep you posted…

What kind of loser must you be to pose as another post-er here?

Oh, yeah THAT kind of loser (an Olby supporter)

It's an abomination that the horrendous treatment of our wounded veterans has gone on without notice for so long. Of course, the injured troops have been dealing with it for some time now….

Download (1096) | Play (871) Download (1061) | Play (511)

Dana Priest does a three minute summation of her column which broke the sad news that our wounded live in a rat and roach infested facility. The word is that once again the people in charge didn't plan for the amount of injured troops and can't handle it. Jon Soltz of VoteVets.org—follows up with Keith and discusses the issue. It's time for some real leadership to get help to the troops. And some real leadership means the readers of C&L. I'm finding out how we can help…I'll keep you posted…

On OlbyPlanet, it's perfectly logical to endorse statements that the troops are "mercenaries" and are showered with "obscene amenities" and, out of the other side of your mouth, condemn the facilties where these soldiers receive medical care as substandard.

Keith is the best person in the world,, he has to be to piss off all the lowlife pile of sh-t rightwingers.

Keith is mad that he has 2 Million less views than Olberloon!

I got bitch slapped on a sunny day.
I got bitch slapped in the month of May.
IIIIIII RUUB MYYYY FAACEEE Today. What Can Make me feel this way?
Getting bitch slapped Getting bitchslapped on a sunnny day!

"More undisputed global warming evidence from that right wing rag, The New York Times. Great Thanks :)

Posted by: The Factor at February 20, 2007 2:45 PM"

Thanks for the article. I have been doing a lot of surfing and reading on the topic of Global Warming.

I always ask how does science know all the factors that affect Global Climate Change, all the possible permutations of their interactions and how does that affect their computer modeling. So far I have only gotten the answer that asserts that my parents and ancestors are racist inbreds and that accounts for my evil and stupid question.

Very scientific, n'est ce pas.

Again, thanks for the source. I'm sure that I will find more info with this guide.

Janet Hawkins
AKA Grammie

First of all, the Globe isn't warming.

Second of all, even if it is, it's not our fault.

Thirdly, even it is our fault, there's nothing we can do about it.

Fourthly, even if there was something we could do about it, why bother, heaven awaits!

"First of all, the Globe isn't warming.

Second of all, even if it is, it's not our fault.

Thirdly, even it is our fault, there's nothing we can do about it.

Fourthly, even if there was something we could do about it, why bother, heaven awaits!

Posted by: The Flat Earth Society at February 20, 2007 6:44 PM"

FES (Flat Earth Society), if that is your deeply held personal religious beliefs please accept my deepest apologies. I try to never question deeply held religious beliefs.

After all, a matter of faith for anyone is indisputable because by its nature faith is indisputable.

I approach Global Warming as science approaches anything. With sceptitism and a requirement of proof that can be replicated by all who question it.

Again, my deepest apologies. I had no intention of casting aspersions on you or your fellow believers.

Janet Hawkins
AKA Grammie

4th place for Olby on Friday night and Bill-O was off! NBC spent it's money wisely...

Speaking of science Janet

"The scientific understanding of climate change is now sufficiently clear to justify nations taking prompt action."
-Joint [11] Science Academies’ Statement: Global Response to Climate Change, 2005

"Greenhouse gases are accumulating in Earth’s atmosphere as a result of human activities, causing surface air temperatures and subsurface ocean temperatures to rise."
-Climate Change Science, U.S. National Academy of Sciences, 2001

SYNOPSIS: The burning of fossil fuels and other human endeavours are causing global warming, says a major scientific report released today by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Written by about 600 climate experts, the UN-backed report also concluded that global warming is causing sea levels to rise and will bring drought and other extreme weather to many parts of the globe. The report, which is the IPCC's most forceful statement to date backing the scientific validity of manmade climate change, also warns that it may be too late to stop global warming by stabilizing greenhouse gas emissions.

Human beings arrogantly overestimate their impact on the planet... ala Krazy Keith Uberloon.

Col. Allard makes a great observation that NBC has turned hard left recently. Keith Olbermann is just a small part of the editorial changes at the network that holds pandering to the temporary happy left as more important to being true to fact, balance and objectivity.

In relation to the previous issue of whether OW needs to continue....I think the simple FACT that Olbermann is never objective in every aspect of his performance, while lying....(maintaning he is a journalist), makes this site all the more important.

Olbermann's and NBC's propaganda needs to be checked with the facts. Robert and J$ accomplish this goal well....and with humor.

Keep up the good work gentlemen, showing that Keith Olbermann is only a shill for the radical left in this country.

Plus.....where else can I engage the best the left has to offer and continue to finish off their moronic arguments like shooting fish in a barrel. Hello Rosie (Bushkill), Professor Honeydew (Bob), OZ (Colbert), Sir Loin of Milquetoast?

cee
"Faith means not wanting to know the truth" Nietzsche (used by leftist OW poster)

"I'd tell you that the Democrats are talking a good game, but they're not even doing that. Everybody in Congress has to understand something: If they continue to fund this war, it's not just the President who owns it. They own it, too." Sgt. Liam Madden

"There were a few tense moments, however, including an encounter involving Joshua Sparling, 25, who was on crutches and who said he was a corporal with the 82nd Airborne Division and lost his right leg below the knee in Ramadi, Iraq. Mr. Sparling spoke at a smaller rally held earlier in the day at the United States Navy Memorial, and voiced his support for the administration’s policies in Iraq. Later, as antiwar protesters passed where he and his group were standing, words were exchanged and one of the antiwar protestors spit at the ground near Mr. Sparling; he spit back." NYT 1/28/07

"I think the Vietnamese are better off in Vietnam," George McGovern - NEWSWEEK

For the idiot who confuses limericks with haiku...

The apricot man
Appears nightly on cable
Hypocrisy reigns

Crystal balling The Hour of Spin: Something is coming into view... we see a name... N-something... Nathan?... No, Neal... Neal... Bush? No... Neal Boortz. Boortz will be attacked by the infamous, deplorable Keith Olbermann, maybe even made "worst person".

Posted by johnny dollar at February 20, 2007 7:19 PM

---------------------------------------------------

Whatever Neal Boortz said, written, or did --- it was not large enough for the Google News search to fill me in on ... will it be more racism, or just more blah-blah-blahing ?!?

Congrats to the brits for being a hell of a lot smarter than this collection of dipsh-ts in office.. damn how come the pretzel did not finish the job

Keith Olbermann American hero champion of democracy and a free press.

Olbermann haters? Anti democracy pussy cowards!