Gosh, is Stuart Smalley our surprise guest? I can't wait to find out.

He skipped right over Wolfeman's Clinton reference...Can't have any of that.

Of course not, LF. He's not going to question his lord and master. I love how the lefties refuse to acknowledge or discuss any issue that could be perceived as negative about their own. Just like we've heard very little about Soros' Halliburton bucks or Bill Maher calling Dems p*****s.

Hey Olby: How's your sister, Jenna? Give her a call and tell her how much you care about her.

That's if she wants to hear from you.

He lowered the music again on WPITW.
He obviously pops corn at night and reads this web site in bed.

Nice to see KO reading all the love letters.

I long for the good ol days when Dan Rather would criticize Tom Brokaw, his better rival on another network, EVERY night during his newscast...

Wait a second, that never happened...that would be psychotic for someone to do that...

How low can Olby's hatred go with the #1 story? What a political hack.

Disgusting and despicable.

Air America host....'nuff said.

Awwww. Not Stuart Smalley. I'm doubly disappointed. We have to see someone from Err America who sucks even worse.

Cenk Uygur...? It looked like a bloated version of a young Victor Mature.

Olbermann is saying not too much about Halliburton's move to Dubai. Could it be Soros is telling him not to mention it?
Hmmm

KO was extra deplorable tonight.

He looked really old and gray tonight.

What silly and petty comments .... every one of them!

Countdown W/ Keith Olberann's OffScreen Disturbance Guide for today, March 13. Yesterday's date was mistaken.

Here is today's tremendous two:

Oddball 1: "Hah hah hah" was faint but noticeable after making fun of an elephant shooting a nice hoop.

Issue #1: Also faint, but this was a gulping noise. Less faint was a falsely deflected f*** word off the screen.

Was that images of your brain johnny, under "obsessed brain image"? Or, was that possibly a composite average of everyone on this site who are obsessed with hating Keith Olbermann?

Maybe Olby can't remember his sister and he can't remember to cover some of these stories everyone else (CNN) is talking about is because he's got early-stage Alzheimers or something?

Or something is right.

Grammie

People are going to know who's responsible. And they're going to get the news - the true news - quickly and simply and entertainingly.

(he speaks with real conviction)

And no special interests will be
allowed to interfere with the truth of that news.

I am sorry that today's Disturbance Guide was so lame. Usually --- Keith Olbermann's staff can not keep from launghing at Olbermann's hilarious observations. I will soldier on, however.

anon 9:36 - Thanks, it means a lot coming from you

Obama Watch Us Bicker in Technicolor ,
Welcome back!
It's great to see you!

Rodan, how can you see him? Are you guys using webcams too?

Rodan: I am sorry that I missed yesterday's comment posts. I love Godzilla/Japanese monsters as well.

I prefer Chinese monsters myself

Obama Watch Us Bicker in Technicolor,
Did you see the latest Godzilla move Final Wars?
The best scene is when the real Godzilla kills the American Godzilla!
It was great.

You mean the fraudulant 1999 Godzilla ?

You guys better look out. Hater is going to be upset at your wasting time on things that don't meet his high standards.

Grammie

Was someone talking about me?

If "hater" had high standards he would not be on Olbermann Watch.com.

Obama Watch Us Bicker in Technicolor ,
Yes, the real Godzilla kills him in 2 minutes! During the fight, they have the song from the movie.

"If "hater" had high standards he would not be on Olbermann Watch.com."

One of the smartest comments ever made on this blog.

Janet Hawkins,

Hater will soon accuse everyone of being Redwolf!

Rodan: I think the jets in the movie exterminated him in faster times ---

A favorite talking point of the Olbyloons is how there is really only ONE poster here who just uses 100 different names. Personally, I think that they are far more guilty of doing that than anyone here but Olby and his loons are quite fond of accusing others of doing what they're really doing.

Redwolf is definitely Grammie. Obama is Redwolf too. Johnny is Redwolf as well.

But Rodan - no way. He couldn't possibly be Redwolf!

Oh yeah, I forgot Brandon - he's Redwolf too.

But not Rodan - he's definitely not Redwolf!

We are all Redwolf!

No Rodan, your not Redwolf!

Hater,
you are Redwolf!

The guy who laughs at everything Keith Olbermann does or says is Redwolf. He must be documented ...

Obama Watch Us Bicker in Technicolor ,

In Godzilla:Final Wars he fights everyone!
At the end he fights King Ghidorah!
Great movie!

Yes Rodan, I am Redwolf too. But you're not.

Rodan: They al;ready did all monsters battling in the past. It was called "Destroy All Monsters". This Final War movie is just a retread ---

Obama Watch Us Bicker in Technicolor ,

Yes it's a remake of it. The difference is the Xians control all the monsters except Godzilla and Mothra.
Godzilla fights even Rodan and Angurus!

Thank God I'm not Redwolf!

OK everyone,
How soon before the Olby Loons stream in and start Bush sucks!
Fox Sucks!

Rodan: Are they fights to the death?

"Rodan: Are they fights to the death?"

Wasn't that the one between Rodan and Godzilla?

Hey, I coulda sworn Rodan lost!

Bush sucks and Fox sucks!

Olbermann is my hero.

Rodan is my hero too!

Redwolf is my hero. Or is he ?

I like the namejacker's too, they're really smart!

Wasn't that the one between Rodan and Godzilla?

You saw Final Wars Hater?

Obama,
Except for the Rodan and Angurus fight, yes Godzilla kills everyone. Mothra dies helping Godzilla.
Minilla, Godzilla's son is in the movie too!

Only sick ass idiots post will other peoples names.

And Billdo is my favorite "independent" watchbitch... ehr... watchdog.

DAMN YOU NBC!!
DAMN YOU BILL GATES!!
DAMN YOU G.E.!!!

DAMN YOU PARTISAN SECULARISTS ALL TO HELL!!

Obama! If Redwolf is your hero, then everybody but Rodan must be your hero!

Rodan: is there gore ? Gore as in blood/flesh/other bodily fluids ?

Obama Watch Us Bicker in Technicolor ,
Thers's some yes.
Either way it was great!
The best of the new Godzillas.

Rodan: Any monsters who failed to make it into this movie?

What color was the blood and other bodily fluids?

Obama Watch Us Bicker in Technicolor ,
Not that I can think of. All the monsters of the Toho universe were in it.

"What color was the blood and other bodily fluids?"
the few fluids were white.
It wasn't that gorey.

Why does O'Reilly do that graphics thing on the side of his screen? Is that because half his audience is deaf?

Was Titanosaurus in the movie?

Hater: Americans look at the left side of the television screen --- you are not patriotic ---

O'Reilly keeps using the word 'I'. Does he think it's all about him?

They say I'm a 'leftie', yet I see both sides of the television screen. Is that bad?

Isn't it wierd when the liberals appear on the right?

Was Titanosaurus in the movie?

Yes, Godzilla kills him.

Could Godzilla kill O'Reilly?

I was just kidding. Neither Americans are supposed to look at the left side of the t.v. screen from either my perspective/Bill O' Rielly's perspective. Just that I was presenting something that Bill O' Rielly, kind of, would say when he is in a hyper mood ---

The segment on O’Reilly was truly astounding, He criticized Bill-O for, he claimed, exploiting the NYC fire for political gain. Anyone who actually saw O’Reilly’s segment would know that it wasn’t the case.

Keith seems to lack any sense of irony. It was he, not O’Reilly, who exploited the tragedy. All for the sake of a pathetic personal vendetta. His fake sincerity convinces no one, even his faithful.

Rodan: Well --- it is a good thing that I stopped paying attention to Godzilla.

Billy: Bill O' Rielly was exploitive. Just bringing up the tragedy in the first place is exploitive. This is not a first for the O' .

I'm watching O'Reilly now, and, as usual, the truth is something in between Johnny's truth, and Olbermann's truth.

>>Why does O'Reilly do that graphics thing on the side of his screen?

It's the Billdo's attempt at legitimizing his daily spin.

It comes out as the "Talking Point's Memo." Notice the Billdo never uses the first person, as in:
"I think..."
but Billdo uses:
"Talking Points believes...Talking Points's observations... Talking Points's investigation..."

It is not the Billdo talking; it is some make-believe "fair and balanced reporting institution."

Sure, Billdo. It is not your self-righteous litany, day after day. It is Talking Points's

And that's a memo.

Imagine a new movie Godzilla vs. Keith Ulbermahn!
The story line Iranian intelligence in conjunction with Al-Qaeda develop a hormone to creat a giant man. Ulbermahn is approached and with the hormone. He uses it and starts destroying cities looking for Republicans.
Godzilla appears and Ulbermahn tries to hide under a desk. Unfortunently he's to big and Godzilla burns him!

average american patriot: almost psychotic, isn't it?

Hwo is "Keith Ulbermahn"?

Rodan: how could you be a true Godzilla fan when they release a movie where Godzilla kills everybody?

Hater,
That's how OReilly pronounced his name.

Keith "Ulbermann" is a Persian version of his name.

"That's how O'Reilly pronounced his name".

Then no wonder he hates O'Reilly!!!

>>average american patriot: almost psychotic, isn't it?

BILLDO?

I'd like to give Billdo the benefit of the doubt, thinking that it is mostly showmanship and posturing. But there's been more than a few times when Billdo actually goes berserk, both on radio and TV.

Now, THAT SHIET IS SCARY.

Bill O' Rielly is paranoid and delusional with a bloated sense of self-importance because he puts up a song and dance that he considers other people's views. That is how I see him. That is how others see him as well.

Obama Watch Us Bicker in Technicolor,
In the movie the Xians are using the monsters to destroy Earth so they can rule. Godzilla and Mothra are defending the Earth.
That's the plot.

And that makes him different from Olbermann how exactly? Paranoid? Check. Bloated sense of self-importance? Yes. Song and dance? Yes. Check. Check. Check. You had a point there Obama?

"Bill O' Rielly is paranoid and delusional with a bloated sense of self-importance"

Tell me about it!

What mystifies me is why in the world 2 - 2.5 people a night would want to watch this guy pontificate at them and his guests like that every night?

One exception though ..... Bill Maher took him to the woodshed on his own show last week. That doesn't happen often. Everybody else seems afraid of him.

And that makes him different from Olbermann how exactly? Paranoid? Check. Bloated sense of self-importance? Yes. Song and dance? Yes. Check. Check. Check. You had a point there Obama?

Posted by: Brandon at March 13, 2007 11:28 PM

The difference is that one of them is a brown nose for the worst presidency in American history.

Rodan: The last time that the Xians tried to take over the world --- only one monster was killed. I can only prey that this movie brings me the realization that I can no longer trust movie makers. This could be another Hellen Keller analogy for me --- one of many.

Brandon: You are correct ... they both are egos. I bet if they walked into a bar together befpr they became hot shots they would really like eachother and get along. Unfortunately ... that would have to be far in the past. They know who they are, now --- the opposite political spectrums and opposite networks.

codas,
One has a brownose from Hillary Clinton and Soros!

>OWUBnT

For all the evils, self inflicted and foisted upon Billdo, I admit the man is extremely smart.
Then again that's where I see his ability to manipulate (mis)information and spread it to others as a danger.

But you are right. Billdo's over acting can only work for so long.

Keep up the good work BILLDO!!!

DAMN YOU NBC!!
DAMN YOU G.E.!!!
DAMN YOU MicroSoft_NBC!!
DAMN YOU PARTISAN SECULARISTS ALL TO HELL!!

GOSH! I ALMOST WANT TO BOYCOTT CANADA!!

I'm watching this O'Reilly show thing, and the show is 2/3 over .... and so far, unless I just slept through it, he hasn't even mentioned the big news of the day; the Gonzalas aide resignation thing. He IS going to mention this, isn't he?

In fact, he hasn't mentioned politics period, but he has used those words "secular progressive" again!

Talk about the dog that won't bark!!!

Hater,
Who cares about the Gonzales thing. It was legal. Case closed.
This is why I don't like Bush, he's scared of the media. He should say, I had them fired because it's my discretion and it was legal.
Then he should tell the media and the Left go screw yourself, you can't do nothing!
If only!

Where does Bill O' Rielly get the wherewithall to make laws? Or Nancy Grace to support testimonies in court? Or Sean Hannity to finger those that teach in ways in which he does not approve of? Or Lars Larson to bring up otherpeople's war histories? There is none. These people are a shame to society --- and just the very fact that their are people out there who support them sheerely because they like these sad excuse for media ethic over paid tivo-merchants are really wasting their lives in a vaccuum of some other person's righteous personas.

Yeah Rodan, that's the problem with the right wing today. As long as it's 'legal', it's perfectly OK. WRONG!!!!!

>>He IS going to mention this, isn't he?

In fact, he hasn't mentioned politics period, but he has used those words "secular progressive" again!

No. BILLDO will TELL YA when something is important enough for YOU to know.
Until then, don't worry. EL FROATING-AT-THE-TRAP WATCHBITCH BILLDO
IS LOOKING OUT FOR YOU!!

Whenever a filthy PARTISAN SECULAR PROGRESSIVE injures you...
YOU CALL FOR EL BILLDO TO THE RESCUE!!

Obama Watch Us Bicker in Technicolor,

Who you rooting for in March Madness. I'm for the Gators!

Rodan: I am not speaking to you for the rest of the night. It is bad enough that you had to inform me of that bloodbath movie, I never want to talk about sports.

Oh ... but who defeats Mothra?

Yeah Patriot, I know. He hardly mentioned the Libby trial until the verdict came in, and then he spent half of his coverage making excuses about why he hadn't covered it until then.

His fans must be the crowd John Dean was talking about when he discussed conservative 'followers'.

I couldn't imagine sitting there every day listening to this guy pontificate with that haughty "I'm better than you" body language, EVEN if he was spitting out liberal ideas!

Obama Watch Us Bicker in Technicolor,
King Ghidorah and Gigan Kill Mothra while Godzilla is knocked out.
However before she dies, she kills Gigan.
Thus the end is a showdown between Godzilla vs. Ghidorah.

Mothra kills Gigan?!?!? But Gigan is tall and bladed??? ---

Mothra explodes on Gigan.

Hater is underated. How could Grammmie?

Why do those with a bad case of Olbsession bitch at people posting about Bush or Fox to stay on topic (actually if you agree with Olbermann and reinforce his views about Bush and Fox-you are staying on topic) but allow everyone to suffer through a recap bad 70's sci-fi without so much as a peep to stay on topic.

Oh yeah, hypocrisy, that's right. I forgot.

You Can't Be Serious,
Unlike you loons, Bush isn't the center of most people's lives.
Plus Ulbermahn isn't just about attacking Bush, He attacks anyone who has a different view point while denying his Leftist views!

Olbermann is hack who needs Cialis to perform in the sack!
All in all He's wack!

>HATER:

I also watch in amazement of the FOX viewers

>>What mystifies me is why in the world 2 - 2.5 people a night would want to watch this guy pontificate at them and his guests like that every night?

On that night of the Libby verdict and on the second night, this open sewer of BUSHWIPERY was closed. So I went to Johnny Dollar's site.

http://homepage.mac.com/mkoldys/iblog/

Anyway. Long story short. I copy-pasted, twice,
a list of fox viewers and posters asking for President Bush to pardon Scooter right then and there.
To demonstrate THEIR STUPIDITY.
Of course, Mr. Fair and Balanced, Johnny BUSHWIPE...erh... Johnny Dollar felt my posts lacked any relevance and they were promptly deleted.

Sadly, the poll/petition at the FOX site is gone too.

On the bright side, we all have FOX... erh... Johnny BUSHWIPE... erh... Dollar, and Robert BUSHWIPE... erh... Robert Cox, to continue entertaining the world with their feats of daring BUSHWIPERY!!

GO JOHNNY!!

average american patriot,
Is Bush the center of your existence. Do have any hobbies?

Olbermann is a true American hero. He cares about people!
Yeah right!

But here�s a little twist sure to make olby wince:

The White House suggested to the Justice Department two years ago that all 93 U.S. attorneys be fired, according to e-mails and internal documents that the administration will provide to Congress today.

Eventually, eight U.S. attorneys were dismissed by last December.

The firings took place after President Bush told Attorney General Alberto Gonzales that he had received complaints that some prosecutors had not energetically pursued voter-fraud investigations, White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said. One of the U.S. attorneys dismissed was John McKay of Seattle.

Documents and interviews indicate that Harriet Miers, who was then the White House counsel, suggested in February 2005 that all the prosecutors be dismissed and replaced with new Republican appointees for Bush�s second term.

That proposal was rejected by Gonzales as impractical and disruptive, Justice officials said.

Now who�s playing politics, olby?
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2003615418_attorneys13.html

Was that images of your brain johnny, under "obsessed brain image"? Or, was that possibly a composite average of everyone on this site who are obsessed with hating Keith Olbermann?

Posted by: at March 13, 2007 9:40 PM
The truth is a killer, isn't it? I don't hate Ulbermahn, I can't stand the fact he defends the enemy and is an outright liar.

>Rodan:

>>Is Bush the center of your existence.

No. Bush could start another war in Iran and it wouldn't cause me a fart.

>>Do have any hobbies?
Yes. Mocking Bush Supporters and their stupid views.

FREE SCOOTER NOW!!
NO CRIME WAS COMMITED!!
FREE SCOOTER NOW!!

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,258624,00.html

The Scooter Libby Trial for Dummies

Tuesday, March 13, 2007

By Mike Baker

GO Bush Supporters!!
FREE SCOOTERS NOW!!
COURTESY OF FOX!!!

(I expect a few Bush Supporters to show up at FOX's offices and demand their FREE SCOOTER! NOW!)

average american patriot,
Is Bush the center of your existence. Do have any hobbies?

Posted by: Rodan at March 14, 2007 12:37 AM
Rodan, his name is "pat", he is not a patriot.

Olbermann is hack who needs Cialis to perform in the sack!
All in all He's wack!
Posted by: Roger at March 14, 2007 12:30 AM

I'm not going to ask how you know this Roger, since what consenting adults do in their bedrooms is none of anyone's business.

I love olbermannwatch - it is the best fun. I love fan sites. I don't think celebrities go to their own fan sites though - although the fans would like them too I would guess.

"He attacks anyone who has a different view point..."

Isn't that what you are doing by calling me a 'Loon?'

Your hypocrisy knows no bounds.

>Is Bush the center of your existence.
No.

Bushwipe in Chief could start war with Iran and it wouldn't cause me a stealth fart.

And my name ain't "pat."
I'm Red Wolf.
Too.

You Can't Be Serious,
Unlike you loons, Bush isn't the center of most people's lives.
Plus Ulbermahn isn't just about attacking Bush, He attacks anyone who has a different view point while denying his Leftist views!
Posted by: Rodan at March 14, 2007 12:27 AM

Road Ant is still afraid 'Communists' are going to take over the country.

Unlike you loons, Olbermann isn't the center of most people's lives.

I can just imagine Red Wolf watching old Godzilla movies occasionally peaking out the blinds of his ghetto flat to check to see if he can see any 'communists' sneaking around outside.

The Leftists are coming! The Leftists are coming!

>>Road Ant is still afraid 'Communists' are going to take over the country.

You mean the Cubans? the Venezuelans? the Brazilians?

How about the
Syria-Iraq-Iran-China-North_Korea-Brazil-Venezuela-Cuba-Progressive Secularists-MUSLIM-HOMOS AXIS OF EVEEEEEEL!!

PLEASE Bush Supporters! SAVE US!!

This 'Jeff' character keeps talking about 'patriots', "defending the enemy", and other things he knows nothing about.

The problem is 'Jeff' doesn't understand patriotism. 'Jeff' doesn't understand what being an American citicizen is all about. 'Jeff' has a ridiculously simplistic view of America, the world, it's problems, and how to solve them. 'jeff' is one of those minions of conservative followers that people like Hannity and O'Reilly love to lead around like little sheep.

"Jeff' is much like the typical five year old that thinks his own daddy is the bestest and toughest daddy in the whole wide world, and anybody who says different is the 'enemy'.

Bush, Fox, and the entire right wing talking machine is Jeff's 'daddy', and Anybody with different ideas is guilty of "defending the enemy". He would follow his 'Daddy' right over the cliff.

Wake up 'Jeff', that kind of blind adoration is anything but 'patriotic'.

I'll tell you what isn't 'patriotic'. Blind adoration of a phony "newsman" who will tell an outrageous lie about Bush, like "None of the previous Presidents ever tried this." An outrageous, obvious, indisputable lie. And yet the Olbypologists don't care. If he attacks Bush, he's a great "journalist", even if he has to make up lies to do it. Such demented hate that is so desperate that it traffics in outright lies is as 'unpatriotic' as you can get.

The Catholic Priest Sex Scandal had nothing to do with homosexuality? So people of the same sex having sex with each other has nothing to do with homosexuality?

President Clinton was impeached for having an affair? Not really. Clinton was impeached for lying and obstruction. Just like Scooter Libby.

Johnny: I don't have a clue who you think has this so called "blind adoration" for Keith Olbermann, but it sure as hell is not me. I have AGREED he is flawed, uses excesses, exagerates at times, his bias shows, and yes, he has even been caught in a few lies, but frankly Johnny, so have you.

I've heard just about everything KO has said about Bush, and what you are calling 'lies' about the president can at the very least be argued by reasonable people. At the same time, I have also heard MANY lies told by Bush himself. I personally believed our president was a liar LONG before I had even heard of KO, so don't try to tell me I'm getting this stuff from KO. I deeply believe Bush has hurt our country immeasurably, and why that doesn't disturb people like you baffles me.

You think KO is a 'liar. WE KNOW, you tell us every damned day! However, you tell me which is worse; A lying TV commentator, or a lying president?

Most of these things you are calling 'lies' can at least be argued by reasonable people. Yes Johnny, we KNOW you hate KO, and I also think that you are being paid to trash him, and you do that even if you have to come up with some stupid little nothing about whether or not he claims to have a sister or not.

Most of us also know that you also have this fawning little page on the Fox website, and that doesn't exactly make you objective with any criticism that you may have of either MSNBC, or KO.

Do you comprehend that many people like me view the Fox 'News' channel EXACTLY the way you feel feel about Keith's show? When I walk into someone else's house and see their TV set tuned to Fox, it literally makes me almost physically ill, but I never say anything. If you really think you can objectively defend Fox while attacking KO, you are as deluded as you say all of us are.

Lets talk about the dog that doesn't bark, to use your own terminology: I just watched the show YOU keep holding up as an alternative to KO last night, and then followed it up with Hannity and Colmes, and NEITHER show even mentioned the resignation of Gonzalas's top aide in the US attorney scandal, which was yesterday's TOP news story! But Hannity did spend an entire segment on the very much DEAD Duke rape case...hardly important news.... even when it was current. Hell, I LIVE near Durham NC, and hardly anyone ever mentions it HERE - yet it won't go away on Fox.

Time after time, Fox almost ignores important stories like the Walter Reed story, and the related Veterans care problem, The Libby trial, and anything else that shows the administration, or their damned war, in any unfavorable light.

You could reasonably argue that MSNBC covers these stories TOO much, but the answer is not in burying them either.

It's an unfortunate sign of the times that people are being forced to choose between politically biased 'news' shows, but much of this is due directly to the unfortunate divide that has been exaberated by this incompetent and historically partisan administration.

There's nothing honorable about what you are doing, but I suppose you need to keep telling yourself differently to give you the incentive to continue.

why does olby do that violent turn to the right as he look down at the floor when he does the tease segment? as always great, thanks!

mike please identify one lie that Mr. Bush has made one please...not something you believe to be a lie an actual verifiable lie.

"not something you believe to be a lie an actual verifiable lie."

In other words, nothing would convince you short of something that could be proven beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law? No, I'm not going to sit here and engage in semantics with you about the definition of a lie.

Sorry Cheney (what a sickening name!) but I know a lie when I hear a lie, and I've heard many from this extremely destructive president.

Mike, Olbermann is NOT a TV Commentator. He is a NEWS ANCHOR. That's how MSNBC bills him. But congratulations on recognizing the fact that he is a commentator, and not really a news anchor. There IS a difference. Pity that MSNBC won't bill his show correctly.

Now let's talk about lies. You can't document a single one from President Bush. Yet you have branded him a liar. When I pointed out Olbermann lied about even the most basic of facts (i.e. his sister) and had proof to back up my claim, you told me that wasn't important. So I'll return the favor for you Mike. Your OPINION that Bush is a liar, which you can't back up with FACTS, isn't important. Because you see, it's not a FACT, it's an OPINION. An opinion from an Olbyloon and I think we all know here what those are worth.

> I just watched the show YOU keep holding up as an alternative to KO

Huh? What are you talking about? My nightly recaps focus on Countdown and the infamous, deplorable one. Even if I wanted to constantly compare it to another show, there's no way I could do so and still post a recap by 9:05 pm. Funny, how I'm constantly promoting some other show without speaking about it.

> Most of these things you are calling 'lies' can at least be argued by reasonable people.

Isn't that interesting. Olby has repeatedly taken statements by Bush, Limbaugh, O'Reilly, and many others and has flat-out labeled them as "lies". In other words, reasonable people could argue that these statements were arguable, or controversial, or possibly just mistakes. Yet Olbermahn doesn't bother with such niceties and just brands them lies. And now you complain when Keith's own standards are applied to Keith himself. Yet you do not complain when Keith does the same thing.

So why don't you tell me how reasonable people can interpret Olby's statement that "none of the previous Presidents has even tried this" as something other than a lie?

Johnny: I am not a historian, but Olby's statement that "none of the previous Presidents tries this" raised my eyebrows a little as well when he made it. The way I remember it, it was an off the cuff remark that probably wasn't planned.

Both Clinton and Bush are known to have done this at the beginning of their first terms, but the consensus is that to do this sort of thing for obvious political reasons 6 years into their presidency IS unusual.

It's not like the 'liberal' is making something out of nothing. The man's TOP aide DID resign over this and Gonzalas DID hold a special news conference acknowledging mistakes. Something like this IS big news when it happens at the top rungs of govrnament.

You may not 'compare' KO's show to another show, but you often suggest letting you do the dirty work of watching KO's show while you tout O'Reilly's show as an alternative in your pre-show write - ups.

> it was an off the cuff remark that probably wasn't planned.

Yes, and whenever someone Olby doesn't like makes an off the cuff remark that probably wasn't planned, why Olbermann just gives them the benefit of the doubt and lets it pass. He NEVER attacks other people for an off the cuff remark that probably wasn't planned, does he?

I have compared the O'Reilly lineup to Olby's maybe a dozen times over hundreds of pre-show posts I've done. Mainly to tweak the OlbyLoons, which is an amazingly easy thing to accomplish. That small fraction of times I've done so is miniscule to the number of times Olby has attacked O'Reilly on the air. I've got a long way to go before I even get close to that percentage.

Brandon:

Bush's lies began in 2000 when he ran on a platform of "not being a nation builder", therebye tricking many people, like me, to vote for him who would not have done so otherwise. Something happens....and what does he do? He becomes a nation builder, which has created the disastrous results everybody who has studies history and culture knew it would.

That was lie #1 and the lies haven't stopped coming since, especially after 911. And don't quibble with me about "How 911 changed everything"... In reality, it didn't change a damned thing.

As for KO being a commentator...I have been saying that all along - do you not read my posts? I don't really care what MSNBC calls him, or what KO calls himself, I know a commentator when I see one and I'll assure you most of his watchers are smart enough to figure that out as well.

"Mainly to tweak the OlbyLoons, which is an amazingly easy thing to accomplish."

You get 'tweaked' every night by a TV personality.

Pathetic...

How can you tell Bush is lying?

His mouth is moving...

Even when his foot is in it...

I'm already sick of this site, even with the new paint job.

I guess it's only fitting that this site is as tired and repetitive as Countdown.

I know, I know, if I don't like it I can leave.

Just like if you don't like Countdown, you can not watch.

Weather Machine?

Mike said "And don't quibble with me about "How 911 changed everything"... In reality, it didn't change a damned thing."

2,700 plus people innocently going to work at the WTC sippping thier coffee at work are savagely attacked, burned to death or jumped to their death and you say that didn't change a thing? Manhattan, D.C., and US airliners under attack yet that didn't change a thing? I hope you really dont mean that.

the worst terrorist attack on US soil in the history of the United States and that doesn't change anything?

I see now why you libs are often accused of not being tough on terrorism.

Tough on Terrorism? You mean like the Bush Administration?

Five years after 9/11, you figure our government would have already solved the obvious security concerns, like protecting our chemical plants or keeping razors away from Britney. But we've failed miserably. Why?

Meet Philip Perry. Already, I can tell you don't like him. Because his name's Philip Perry, which sounds like the name of a guy who would screw the common interest on behalf of powerful corporations.
And if you guessed that's what he did for a living, you'd be right.

As documented in this incisive Washington Monthly article by Art Levine, after 9/11 the Environmental Protection Agency looked at chemical plants across the U.S. and concluded that at least 700 sites posed a potential threat to kill or injure over 100,000 people if attacked. In neocon math, that's over thirty 9/11s.

After nearly a year's worth of work led by Christie Todd Whitman and Tom Ridge, twelve senior Bush administration officials met in March of 2003 to finalize legislation granting Whitman's EPA the authority to oversee chemical plant security and require them to submit plans for lowering their risks. But then Philip Perry, at that time the general counsel for the White House Office of Management and Budget, waltzed in, said Congress would never go for it, and the deal was dead. Our chemical plants would have to go back to being protected by the same folks who protected them before: nobody.

It had long been part of the official White House plan for the EPA to oversee the chemical industry, but Christie Whitman said: "They woke up and heard from industry." And as it turns out, Philip Perry wasn't just your garden-variety White House chemical industry hack -- he's married to Elizabeth Cheney, the Cheney daughter who likes boys. The a--hole doesn't fall far from the tree.

Six months after that March 2003 meeting, Perry left the White House to lobby for the Washington law firm that represents the American Chemistry Council, strong-arming the Department of Homeland Security for Lockheed Martin and General Electric. But in 2005 he returned to the administration -- he didn't leave his lobbying job, just moved offices. In his new job as general counsel for the Department of Homeland Security, he gained authority for DHS to oversee chemical plant security simply so he could require nothing from them. Because it's just so inconvenient for chemical plants to have to lock their doors at night. Not only that, but he also finagled things so that DHS has the power to set aside laws from commie states like New Jersey that have attempted to put stricter security requirements for their chemical plants in place.

People ask why we haven't been hit again since 9/11. The answer is luck.

"None of the previous Presidents ever tried this."

I can't believe that KO said that with a straight face! There should've been a laugh-track attached to the end of that line!
BTW, thanks for bringing this site back.

bill maher,

i never said the republicans were tough on terroism, i said that liberals are accused of being soft on terrorism clearly when a liberal like mike says nothing really chnged after 9/11 it illustrates the point why liberals cannot be trusted to deal with terrorism. I wish this country were a lot tougher on terrorism - republicans too.

Your logic is funny Cheney!

You think the Bushies are "tough on terrorism" by doing EXACTLY what the terrorists wanted them to do, therebye creating far more angry little terrorists as a direct result.

I don't know, but my so called "liberal soft on terrorism" ideas run more along the lines of not attacking and occupying countries that didn't attack us, but staying hot on the trail of the country and the individuals who actually DID attack us.

People ask why we haven't been hit again since 9/11. The answer is luck.

**************************

Typical lefty in denial on this post.
These guys can't be reasoned with.

Mike, congrats on admitting that Olbermann is NOT a newsman and that Countdown is NOT a news show. Now if we could just get HIM to admit that and MSNBC to label him as such, our work here would be done.

Mike, congrats on admitting that Olbermann is NOT a newsman and that Countdown is NOT a news show. Now if we could just get HIM to admit that and MSNBC to label him as such, our work here would be done.
Posted by: Brandon at March 14, 2007 1:33 PM

Your 'work' here Brandon consists of mutual masturbation with fellow Olbybashers. Which no doubt would continue regardless of what Olbermann says or does.

Keep on Strokin' eachother!

Brandon:

The only problem I have with your last post at 1:33 is that you seem to be implying that I am just now coming around to admitting that Olbermann is a commentator. Not so, I've been saying that all along.

People ask why we haven't been hit again since 9/11. The answer is luck.

**************************

Typical lefty in denial on this post.
These guys can't be reasoned with.
Posted by: Little Feechie at March 14, 2007 1:30 PM

Yeah, Little Feechie, Better to not actually discuss what the body of the post actually says, that might require actual thought. You're right, you can't reason with reason.

BTW, I'm neither a Lefty, nor Typical, But whatever you need to tell yourself to fill in your color-by-numbers world.

Typical This, Typical That!

>>

Typical This, Typical That!

>>

Typical This, Typical That!

>>

Typical This, Typical That!

>>

Better color-by-numbers that cut and paste like you Bill. Do you ever actually have an original thought or do you just use the talking points gathered from your daily visits to your beloved radical left-wing loony sites? You can't even think up an original name and are apparently too ashamed to use your real name. Intead you hide behind someone else's.

I wonder what name Burger King and Woozy are hiding behind, now?

Maher....

Why read the rest of your slop, when you can't even admit that we are much safer now then on 9/11/01?

To say we have not been attacked is because of sheer luck defies even Olbylogic.

The level of stupidy of the Olberloons is staggering.

mikey, it's obvious you're not proud of the fact you defend the enemy. I have been reading your posts for a while, if you want me to go back and re-post them for you, I will. The fact you are low enough to bring my Father into this proves what a loser you are. Yes, my Father was the toughest man in the world, when he was alive, you pathetic piece o' sh-t!

"I wonder what name Burger King and Woozy are hiding behind now?"

If you were as smart as you think you are, you would have figured that out on your own, wouldn't you?

woozy, i knew you were hiding here, pretty sad you are so ashamed of your posts and view points you have to keep changing your name.

Jeff: "The fact that you are low enough to bring my Father into this"

I challenge anyone to go back and read my 1:55 AM post and then come to this same ridiculous conclusion that 'Jeff' just came to.

I was clearly using EVERY 5 year old's image of their father as a metaphor to illustrate Jeff's simplistic thinking and blind loyalty to his incompetent government. Jeff, I really believe everyone else who read that post got it but you.

I was lampooning YOU Jeff, not your father, whom no doubt was a very honorable man.

Jeffy, still salivating over MOAB's and other big bombs? That does give you something very much in common with our Islamic Radical enemies.

Mike, Jeffy actually made a post on this very blog claiming that Stephen Colbert is a conservative who is teasing liberals, and that liberals just "didn't understand" that, Yes, he actually said that! so don't expect Jeffy to understand your metaphors.

Woogy,
Jeff is making a valid point. In Sun Tzo's Art of War he states that inorder to defeat you enemies you must be more ruthless. We have Bush is running a phoney war. We need an FDR/Truman or Lincoln who would unleash the full might of the US on Al-Qaeda, Hizballah, Iran, Iraq and Syria.
We need to take the gloves off.
Bush is a traitor and a clown. Wasting good patritic people's lives!
Either fight to win or leave!

Bush is a traitor and a clown. Wasting good patriotic lives!"

At least we agree on that point.

Woogy,
Yes we do although we're coming from different angles.
If you fight, fight to win, if not don't fight.

Maher....

Why read the rest of your slop, when you can't even admit that we are much safer now then on 9/11/01?

To say we have not been attacked is because of sheer luck defies even Olbylogic.

The level of stupidy of the Olberloons is staggering.
Posted by: Little Feechie at March 14, 2007 2:44 PM

You use the word 'stupidy' and you think I'm stupid?

I just heard of this site. It's hilarious!
Get a life, dude.

Ulbermahn is a Stalinist who wants to silence his crtics!

What's Rodan my homie!
I'm going to stop by later so we can blaze.
As a Democrat it embarrases me that members of my party take Ulbermahn serious. He's a sock puppet for Soros and the far Left!

Joker,
I'll holla at you in a few!

When I walk into someone else's house and see their TV set tuned to Fox, it literally makes me almost physically ill, but I never say anything.

Posted by: Mike at March 14, 2007 7:03 AM
-----------------------------------------

Were you overwrought when you said this? Or if I had posted this and replaced Fox with MSNBC, NBC or any other news channel would you question my rationality?

So Factor and Hannity and Colmes didn't mention what you wanted to hear last night. It is really becoming tiresome for the same Red Herring, Tu Quoque, to be dragged out over and over every night. I think this should be renamed the KO Yeah But Fallacy.

Grammie

Oh Brandon, where do I begin?

>Better color-by-numbers that cut and paste like you Bill.

For the last time, it's copy and paste, not cut and paste. Cut and paste is an outdated graphic design term for mocking something up on paper instead of digitally. Copy and paste is what you do when you lift copy from one location and paste it somewhere else. In digital terms there is copy (Cntr + C), paste (Cntr + V) and cut (Cntr + X). To cut is delete something which I didn't do. Living in a color by numbers world means you live life the way you think others want you to, which is what you do.

>Do you ever actually have an original thought or do you just use the talking points gathered from your daily visits to your beloved radical left-wing loony sites?

This from the guy who likes to quote Levine, referring him as 'the great one?' Now that's hyprocrisy. I gather my information from a number of news sources. I am not left-wing. far from it. You know nothing of my politics. You'd rather make ME the issue instead of the issue itself. You think everyone who disagrees with you is a 'Loon.' That must make the world a very lonely place for you.

>You can't even think up an original name and are apparently too ashamed to use your real name. Intead you hide behind someone else's.

I used Bill Maher's name because he actually wrote the piece. To do otherwise would have been Ann Colteresque plaigarism.

>Posted by: Brandon at March 14, 2007 2:33

Hide? Like 'Brandon' really tells us anything about you. I answer all critics and hide from no one.

Listen up folks. I'm not fan of Olbermann, I'm no Left-Winger. Actually most of my friends consider me quite conservative.

I know it blows your guy's minds to have someone posting here who isn't an Olbermann fan but still thinks all the Olbybashers are idiots.

I stumbled across this site quite by accident. I enjoy confronting ignorance and hyprocrisy wherever I find it, and here it's like shooting fish in a barrel.

So you can knock off the 'Left Wing Nut' and 'Olbyloon' Bullsh-t. I am neither.

Not all your enemies are the same, although I'm sure it makes you feel better to think they are.

I'm just a conservative who doesn't parrot NeoCon talking points, and call things the way I see them, and you Brandon are an Idiot with a captal I.

What's Rodan my homie!
I'm going to stop by later so we can blaze.
As a Democrat it embarrases me that members of my party take Ulbermahn serious. He's a sock puppet for Soros and the far Left!
Posted by: The Joker at March 14, 2007 4:49 PM

So Road Ant and the Jacker get together and 'Blaze.' Well doesn't that just explain everything!

WASHINGTON - Sen. John Sununu of New Hampshire on Wednesday became the first Republican in Congress to call for Attorney General Alberto Gonzales' dismissal, hours after President Bush expressed confidence in his embattled Cabinet officer.

I love it when the Olbyloons get their panties in a wad and get offended when they're called out for being what they are: Olbermann apologists. I love it even more when they single me out for their "abuse". It amuses me and lets me know I'm right on target with my posts. Thanks for the confirmation Anti-Brandon! You've made my day!

Democratic Prez candidates won't allow Fox News to host debates. Why? Simply because the refuse to be scrutinized by anyone other than themselves. HA!

Trying again without the typos and mistakes...
Democratic Prez candidates won't allow Fox News to host debates. Why? Simply because they refuse to be scrutinized by anyone other than the left . HA!

Trying again without the typos and mistakes...
Democratic Prez candidates won't allow Fox News to host debates. Why? Simply because they refuse to be scrutinized by anyone other than the left . HA!

Janet wants to know:

"were you overwrought when you said this?"....In a word, no!

"Hannity and Colmes didn't mention what you wanted hear last night"....Not the point I was making at all Janet: The POINT was both Fox shows (O'Reilly's too) skipped over ALL the political news stories of the day, including the major one about the US Attorney scandal. And you guys have the nerve to complain about the stories KO skips (or the dog that doesn't bark)?

Finally, the point about walking into someone's house and seeing Fox was only to illustrate the lunacy of how you people go ballistic about what MSNBC does, without having the understanding that what Fox does is at LEAST as biased as MSNBC.... or far worse in my humble opinion. We might just as well call Fox "the Republican news agency Fox".

Because inquiring minds like Janet's want to know!

IT'S GREAT, REALLY GREAT WATCHING THE TOTAL MELTDOWN OF THIS CORRUPT ADMINISTRATION.

Mike,
Most people don't care about the Attorney firings. It was legal. It's a press made issue. It doesn't affect my life or yours.
In other words, who cares!

6:58: "IT'S GREAT, REALLY GREAT WATCHING THE TOTAL MELTDOWN OF THIS CORRUPT ADMINISTRATION".

Thats why you won't see much coverage of it on Fox.

I don't take much glee in the meltdown as you do though, because of the damage that has been done to our country by these people.

Rodan: "It doesn't affect my life or yours."

Wrong! Government misconduct affects my life very much. It also affects everybody else, whether they know it or not at the moment. I don't live my life in my own little bubble.

Mike,
Me and Rodan were out talking with our neighbors and no one talked about the attorney firings! No one cares!

Mike,
The firings were LEGAL!
It's a media issue !
Most people don't care!

"The firings were LEGAL!"

But they were unethical!!!!

I CARE!!!!!!

The firings were LEGAL!
It's a media issue !
Most people don't care!

SHORTLY, WE WILL SEE JUST HOW LEGAL THESE FIRINGS WERE.

Olbermann is a Leftwing hack.
He needs Cialis or his little pecker goes limp in the sack!
Katy Turic says her sex life is wack!

Olbermann sleeps with 16 year old girls!

What's this obcession with Keith's penis? Sound like this site is run by Ann Coulter/AKA James Two Dollar.

He attacks others for his own flaws!
Plus rumors in NY that he seduces 16 year old girls!

Olbermann is a bitch ass!
He's straight pussy!

This site is totally juvenile, junior high, at best. The kind of gossip that 13 year girls thrive on.

This site is totally juvenile, junior high, at best. The kind of gossip that 13 year girls thrive on.

Posted by: at March 14, 2007 7:26 PM
You are here, why? lol

"The firings were LEGAL!"

But they were unethical!!!!

I CARE!!!!!!

Posted by: Mike at March 14, 2007 7:13 PM
mikey, Billy Boy fired 93 US attnys. Unethical? legal? I don't recall hearing those words, then.

Hey Mike what do you think of this:

Since it was rechartered in 1982, the Muslim Brotherhood has spread its network across the Middle East, Europe, and even America. At home in Egypt, parliamentary elections in 2005 saw the Muslim Brotherhood winning 20 percent of the available legislative seats, comprising the largest opposition party block. Its Palestinian affiliate, known to the world as HAMAS, recently gained control of the Palestinian Authority after elections secured for them 74 of 132 seats in the Palestinian Legislative Council. Its Syrian branch has historically been the largest organized group opposing the Assad regime, and the organization also has affiliates in Jordan, Sudan, and Iraq. In the US, the Muslim Brotherhood is primarily represented by the Muslim American Society (MAS).

For those who have read The Project, what is most troubling is not that Islamists have developed a plan for global dominance; it has been assumed by experts that Islamist organizations and terrorist groups have been operating off an agreed-upon set of general principles, networks and methodology. What is startling is how effectively the Islamist plan for conquest outlined in The Project has been implemented by Muslims in the West for more than two decades. Equally troubling is the ideology that lies behind the plan: inciting hatred and violence against Jewish populations around the world; the deliberate co-opting and subversion of Western public and private institutions; its recommendation of a policy of deliberate escalating confrontation by Muslims living in the West against their neighbors and fellow-citizens; the acceptance of terrorism as a legitimate option for achieving their ends and the inevitable reality of jihad against non-Muslims; and its ultimate goal of forcibly instituting the Islamic rule of the caliphate by shari’a in the West, and eventually the whole world.

Since it was rechartered in 1982, the Muslim Brotherhood has spread its network across the Middle East, Europe, and even America. At home in Egypt, parliamentary elections in 2005 saw the Muslim Brotherhood winning 20 percent of the available legislative seats, comprising the largest opposition party block. Its Palestinian affiliate, known to the world as HAMAS, recently gained control of the Palestinian Authority after elections secured for them 74 of 132 seats in the Palestinian Legislative Council. Its Syrian branch has historically been the largest organized group opposing the Assad regime, and the organization also has affiliates in Jordan, Sudan, and Iraq. In the US, the Muslim Brotherhood is primarily represented by the Muslim American Society (MAS).

For those who have read The Project, what is most troubling is not that Islamists have developed a plan for global dominance; it has been assumed by experts that Islamist organizations and terrorist groups have been operating off an agreed-upon set of general principles, networks and methodology. What is startling is how effectively the Islamist plan for conquest outlined in The Project has been implemented by Muslims in the West for more than two decades. Equally troubling is the ideology that lies behind the plan: inciting hatred and violence against Jewish populations around the world; the deliberate co-opting and subversion of Western public and private institutions; its recommendation of a policy of deliberate escalating confrontation by Muslims living in the West against their neighbors and fellow-citizens; the acceptance of terrorism as a legitimate option for achieving their ends and the inevitable reality of jihad against non-Muslims; and its ultimate goal of forcibly instituting the Islamic rule of the caliphate by shari’a in the West, and eventually the whole world.

BY DICK "THE DICK" CHANEY

Woogy,
Jeff is making a valid point. In Sun Tzo's Art of War he states that inorder to defeat you enemies you must be more ruthless. We have Bush is running a phoney war. We need an FDR/Truman or Lincoln who would unleash the full might of the US on Al-Qaeda, Hizballah, Iran, Iraq and Syria.
We need to take the gloves off.
Bush is a traitor and a clown. Wasting good patritic people's lives!
Either fight to win or leave!

Posted by: Rodan at March 14, 2007 3:55 PM
Rodan, woozy is just that, woozy, hence the name change, it fits better. Sometimes he is "mutt", now he has a new name or posts no name at all. The point is, woozy is a "cutnrunr", he thinks we should just leave and he is against bombing whatsoever. He has no idea what a war is, though he claims to have served. Also, he didn't even know what a moab was, I had to tell him. Not sure where or when he served,but, it makes you wonder. moab=mother of all bombs! Let's put them to use!

Jeff,
I agree this country traets Muslims with too much respect. We should fire bomb their cities like we did to the Germans and Japanese!

Jeff and Rodan,
Do you 2 think it's true Olbermann sleeps with 16 year old girls?
Why does he attack others like Limbaugh, when he uses Cialis?

Jeff: I touched on that very point earlier.

Yes, it is quite customary and expected for EVERY NEW administration to ask for the resignation of all these polically appointed US attorneys, and to replace some if not all of them at that time. Bush did it early in his term, and yes, Clinton did it too.

What is NOT customary and expected is to do it in mass for obvious political reasons 6 years into the presidency. So your comparison to "Billy Boy" is not at all valid.

It is not just people like me and the so called 'liberal' press that have decided there is a problem here. Gonzalas and Bush have both personally admitted that "mistakes were made" Gonzalas could easily lose his job over this and his top aide already has. You tell me, why would this be happening if there is nothing to this? The justice department should not be politicized by either party....Where there is smoke, there is fire.

Jeffy thinks it's a problem that I didn't know what a "moab" is. I guarantee you Jeffy that 95% of the population wouldn't know, or care about that ridiculous tag either. We can't dominate the world with bombs, and only an idiot believes otherwise.

And yes, Jeffy, I definitely served. And yes Jeffy, I know exactly what war is, as well as what bombs are for that matter. I was stationed for a year at one of the biggest Vietnam War bombing bases for North Vietnam in Tahkli, Thailand, during the Vietnam war. The roar of several hundred planes taking off every morning was something to behold. Some didn't come back. On top of all that, my father is a veteran of three wars. I even visited him in Saigon in 1971. All of This might have something to do with why I am not as impressed with big bombs and military solutions the way you people who have never served seem to be so starry eyed about.

Don't try to explain to me what war is, because you can't begin to comprehend what I know about it, "moabs" aside!

By the way, I used Mutt temporarily just to hassle you. Ithought it was kind of cute. You know, recreating the "Mutt & Jeff" comic character thing, in case you are too young to have heard of that either.

Mike, if you are going to repond to my words at least you should try to read the them correctly. As I said and you only quoted part of:

"So Factor and Hannity and Colmes.....>"

My point was, and still is, that that old and used to death Tu Quoque is and will always be a fallacious argument.

Additionally, there is a distinct difference between News (both MSNBC and KO self label as unbiased news) and commentary and personal/political OPINION SHOWS.

KO brings up BO over and over. And no one should respond because? BO is mentioned a hundred to one by KO and his fans here to anyone else bringing him up.

You obviously misunderstand the basis in both fact and fairness of 'the dog that didn't bark' segment. One example. KO pounded the "Habeus Corpus' story mercilessly. Yet, when the second highest court in the land issued a ruling that blew all his pronouncements out of the water, a silent dead calm sea. Not even a hint, much less a whisper, that his often and blaringly loud proclamations had been contradicted by learned and honored and judges on the SECOND HIGHEST COURT IN THE LAND.

Now, how should I respond to Mike's last point? "When I walk into someone else's house and see their TV set tuned to Fox, it literally makes me almost PHYSICALLY ILL (caps mine)." was really only meant to point out "the LUNACY (caps mine) of you people go ballistic about what MSNBC does" .

There is no response. My lunacy level can't rise to this exalted level of lunacy. :)

Grammie

Janet:

I've never commented on KO's failure to discuss the Habeaus Corpus High Court ruling because I thought it was a non-story myself. I was very disapointed in the ruling but the court is spoken and there is nothing he nor I can do about it. I've never accepted a court's ruling as absolute truth just as I'm sure you've never accepted the abortion standard.

Did he mention it? This site says he didn't. Should he have mentioned it? Probably. But what else could he say...go on a tirade against the Supreme Court?

By the way, why are you so found of Latin words? Are you Catholic?

woozy, I don't think we can dominate the world with bombs, nor have I ever said that. I am just trying to say that (in Iraq) going around randomly knocking on doors and passing out candy to the kids is obviously not working. Our soldiers have been sitting ducks over there since day one while the Air Force has been doing very little to nothing. The "don't shoot until shot at" rules of engagment didn't and will never work, either. That's how a liberal would fight a war (harriet miers). Thank God President Bush sent her down the road.

What is NOT customary and expected is to do it in mass for obvious political reasons 6 years into the presidency. So your comparison to "Billy Boy" is not at all valid.

It is not just people like me and the so called 'liberal' press that have decided there is a problem here. Gonzalas and Bush have both personally admitted that "mistakes were made" Gonzalas could easily lose his job over this and his top aide already has. You tell me, why would this be happening if there is nothing to this? The justice department should not be politicized by either party....Where there is smoke, there is fire.

Posted by: Mike at March 14, 2007 7:57 PM
mikey, firing 93 across the board all at once doesn't fall into the "mass" category? Can you say "clinton apologist"?

Of course he's a Clinton-apologist. He's also an Olbermann apologist. What do you expect?

Mike, you've never commented on KO's failure to mention anything that I am aware of, other than to bring it up in a Tu Quoque argument, on this thread. That doesn't seem to restrain you from accusing others, esp 'you people', of being lunatics.

KO spent a great deal of time accusing GW of shredding the constitution by destroying the centuries old rock bed of rights guaranteed by Habeus Corpus. Surely you remember. At the very LEAST a passing mention that the DC court had issued a ruling and what the salient points were should have been made by KO.

The point is not whether you consider such a ruling as a non story, but whether it is a story based on KO's own criteria. Evidently not. KO has not seen fit to mention it and bring Johnathan Turley on to discuss it. And I remind you that you, yourself, admitted to being persuaded that the screeching diatribes (OK, not how you phrased it) might be or were wrong. That is why I referenced it in a response to you.

"By the way, why are you so found of Latin words? Are you Catholic?"

When I was a school girl Latin was universally offered, and frequently required, for all students for a very good reason. Because Latin is the origin of the western world's languages. Latin not only can help one understand grammar, but also expands one's vocabularly.

As for the nonsensical, or is it the bigoted part of your question, I was born, raised and educated a Catholic. And that means exactly WHAT?

Rest assured that the fallacy Tu Quoque has nothing to do with Catholicism. It is definitely well illustrated, though, by KO fans.

I have to go now. I feel a swoon coming on for J$. Swooooooooon!

Grammie

"or is it the bigoted part of your question, I was born, raqised and educated a Catholic, and that means exactly WHAT?"

It means you were "born, raised, and educated" exactly like my beloved wife was.

See Janet...if you go looking for insults and slights, you will find them, even when they arn't really there, just like Johnny does routinely.

I have to go now. I feel a swoon coming on for J$. Swooooooooon!

Grammie

Posted by: Janet Hawkins at March 14, 2007 11:18 PM

I know. Isn't he adorable!

Keith,
I think it is high time you and all the major networks took up the North American Union and Security and Prosperity Plan issues before the neo-cons set in motion the demise of the United States as a sovereign nation. Bush is meeting with Calderone and the Canadian Prime Minister to push forward with the New World Order as his father and Clinton did before him.

The real danger is that if Hillary gets elected, she will continue with the aims of Big Corporations and New World Order enthusiasts to the detriment of all citizens of all three countries. The NAU/SPP and NAFTA Super Highway are real and present dangers to the sovereignty of the US and a Constitution that all representatives of government and the president have sworn to uphold. The NUA/SPP is an attack on the integrity of the US as a nation and if pressed for approval can be tantamount to treason by anyone who participates in the establishment of the NAU!!!!!

The actions of the Bush Administration and neo-cons to allow border security to languish was deliberate on the part of the Justice Department, Homeland Security and Executive Branch to undermine any attempt to stop illegal immigration and cross-border movement of trucks and commerce. These are just the beginning steps needed for the establishment of the NAeU/SPP.

Look at the activities of the SPP Strategic Planning Group at the University of Arizona and you will get a clearer picture of what is transpiring.

Heh. Maybe you meant to express shock, but it's "eked out", not "eeked out"! ;)