I think Olby's dramatic removal of Ashleigh Banfield's borrowed eyeglasses during the first minutes of the show was my one of my favorite pompous Olbymoments since he's been stinking up the airwaves. Keith Anallly, Drama Queen.

I wonder if he will mention the 15 British military houseguests that are staying with Olby's Iranian pals in Tehran? The Revolutionary Guard are such warm hosts.

You gave yourself a bronze, Olby? Just a "Worse"? That's so out of character for you. I mean, if you're going to bother to recognize only one of your scores of hypocritical insults, at least remain within your true character and give yourself the gold. Since you love to tell everyone how priceless and important you are, it is the least you could do. In your own mind, you consider yourself the best, so why not go for the gold?

The very fact that he even named himself a WPITW proves the indisputable influence of Olbywatch. Wasn't that worth coming back to see, Bob and J$?

Top 15 Ways to Spot the Olber-Obsessed:

(50% More facts than your average top-10 list!)
¬¬_______________________________________________________________________

1.) The Olber-Obsessed repeatedly use the term ‘OlbyLoon’ whether the poster says anything in support of Olbermann or not. This will also be proven by all the posts in response to this post.
_______________________________________________________________________

"You got to be kidding me. A bunch of necks sitting around their computers, high-fiving each other on a message board dedicated to a TV show by an ex-sportscaster?"

And an Olbyloon coming to his (her?) hero's defense! LOL!
Posted by: JohnE at March 19, 2007 11:43 PM

As for report comment function, that's Mr Cox's department. And I don't think he wants to do that anyhow. Since watching OlbyLoons in their natural habitat not only shows them up for what they are, but it's also great entertainment.
Posted by: johnny dollar at March 15, 2007 11:12 PM

Not an Olbermann fan huh? And how many other lies have you told today?
Posted by: Brandon at March 16, 2007 1:09 PM

_______________________________________________________________________

2.) The Olber-Obsessed let their paranoia show by claiming everyone is ‘Mikey.’
______________________________________________________________________

I only bring up mikey/woozy because he said the other day he wasn't going to post here anymore because he was tired of losing and 5 minutes later he was making posts, anonomously, of course. His posts aren't hard to see, like tonight. I brought up moab and he immediately posted, like before. He has no will power.
Posted by: jeff at March 18, 2007 12:56 AM

Factor, remember mikey,woogy,mutt,beverly,cecil?All the same olbyloon. He is now calling himself cw. A coward is right! Yes, I am jeff and I changed my name to royalking and I am man enough to admit it, unlike the coward little mikey. He reasorts to "anon", also.
Posted by: royalking at March 21, 2007 1:27 AM

little mikey refers to himself as "he", how psycho/olbyloonist is that?
Posted by: jeff at March 20, 2007 1:21 AM

_______________________________________________________________________

3.) The Olber-Obsessed accuse ‘OlbyLoons’ of ‘changing the subject’ when anyone, such as Bush or O’Reilly are mentioned. If Olbermann speaks out against the Bush Administration or Fox or O’Reilly, and an Olbermann fan comes on and attempts to explain why he does so, that isn’t even close to changing the subject. It’s just bringing up things the Olber-Obsessed don’t want to talk about, Olbermann’s views and support for them.
_______________________________________________________________________

I'm sure there is no one else around to offer up his unique refrain that essentially countered all comers with "I know you are but what is Bush".
Posted by: Cecelia at March 16, 2007 1:45 PM

I know this is a difficult concept to grasp, but I'll try to make it simple so everyone, even OlbyLoons, can get it.
This site is called Olbermann Watch.
This site is NOT called A Government Official Watch.
Clear now?
Posted by: johnny dollar at March 17, 2007 3:47 PM

No, they think the site is called Bushwatch or foxWatch or whatever, JD. They've never grasped the concept that this site is called Olbermannwatch. Remember the tiresome Mike and his insistence that any discussion of Olbermann was "off-topic"?
Posted by: Brandon at March 17, 2007 4:24 PM

Why post a list of O'Reilly's guests? I don't know, maybe because the name of this board isn't O"reilly watch?
Posted by: Brandon at March 15, 2007 10:54 PM

_______________________________________________________________________

4.) The Olber-Obsessed are deathly afraid of George Soros because he has as much money as Murdoch. BTW Murdoch actually owns a media conglomerate, Soros does not.
_______________________________________________________________________

Olberman has no talents he's a sock puppet for Clinton and soros!
Posted by: Rodan at March 15, 2007 5:01 PM

Hey Nate don't bitch you have Soreass controlling Ulbermahn.
Us patriotic Moderate-Liberals and Conservatives have Fox.
Don't bitch just because the Leftist-Islamic alliance doesn't control everything.
f--- Iran!
f--- Al-Qaeda!
f--- the Left!
Posted by: The Joker at March 17, 2007 3:12 AM

Soreass is a Stalinist, his goal is to establish a Stalinist state. Ulbermahn is his propaganda piece. He has losers like you to establish this Stalinist state.
You're a clown Coward watch. you're a senile bafoon.
Posted by: Rodan at March 16, 2007 1:02 AM

_______________________________________________________________________

5.) The Olber-Obsessed think everything should be exactly the way they want it to be.
_______________________________________________________________________

Bob and Johnny,
I really wish you two would rethink this new look for the site. It's awful. So user unfriendly. I just hate it.
Posted by: Cecelia at March 19, 2007 9:39 PM

Bob,
You need stricter rules for these morons AND a new layout.
Posted by: Cecelia at March 20, 2007 12:24 AM

_______________________________________________________________________

6.) The Olber-Obsessed use words taught to them by their conservative heroes such as O’Reilly, Malkin, and Savage.
_______________________________________________________________________

The only way to debate the "unhinged" is to insult them.
Posted by: Rico at January 14, 2007 7:54 PM

Another result of ‘secular humanist’ thinking....but hey, with all we have to do, who's got time to take care of Grandpa?
Posted by: cee at January 16, 2007 1:47 PM

"Liberalism, it is proven day in and day out right here on this site, it is a horrible mental disorder."

Yes Jeff....The liberal immedietely becomes emotional, demogogues the issue and looks for someone to blame......never SOLVING the problem.
Posted by: cee at February 21, 2007 2:09 PM

Decider, sadly mistaken, again, Hannity and Lizard face Colmes have never used the "liberalism is a mental disorder." That come from the great Micheal Savage and it couldn't be truer.
Posted by: jeff at February 21, 2007 4:11 PM

_______________________________________________________________________

7.) The Olber-Obsessed make claims to have the ‘Higher Ground.’ Remember, Higher Ground is like Zen, if you have to claim it, you ain’t got it.
_______________________________________________________________________

Rico, come on. That last comment was beneath you and out of line. Remember, slicing with a scapel is more painful than bludgeoning with a broadaxe. It also gives you the high ground, which by right, is ours anyway.
Janet Hawkins
AKA Grammie
Posted by: Janet Hawkins at January 14, 2007 7:07 PM
_______________________________________________________________________

8.) The Olber-Obsessed get VERY defensive when someone points out the unworthiness of this endeavor called Olbermann Watch.
_______________________________________________________________________

It's Mike who posts here all hours of the day and night. And it's you liberals who keep posting the same talking points (Bush Bad! Olbermann perfect!). I'd say that it's the libs here who don't have a life.
Posted by: Brandon at January 17, 2007 10:29 PM

How can these people not realize how idiotic it sounds to claim to care or know little about Olbermann yet find your way to this site in order to spend time chiding the regulars on wasting their time!
Posted by: Cecelia at March 20, 2007 12:32 AM

_______________________________________________________________________

9.) The Olber-Obsessed proudly display their ignorance by not bothering to learn to spell or write while posting in a public forum. Then, predictably, accuse the ‘OlbyLoons’ of focusing on such errors while ignoring the debate.
_______________________________________________________________________

Brandon, that is an olbyloon go to, when they get caught trying to debate an issue of which they no nothing about and they are called on it, they go after any spelling errors. That would be known as "blame, scapegoat and divert" tactics.
Posted by: jeff at March 13, 2007 12:51 PM

Can any olbyloon explain why when they loose a debate they go back and do grammar checks to find typo's? Does Ulbermahn tell you to do that in your dreams?
Posted by: jeff at March 15, 2007 12:37 PM

_______________________________________________________________________

10.) The Olber-Obsessed show their undying support for Fox News.
_______________________________________________________________________

Get over it Olby lovers. Fox News speaks truth to power. You are afraid to watch because if you do, it might educate your simple terrorist brain and you might enjoy living in your own country.

Posted by: The Factor at March 21, 2007 12:53 AM

How bout that Great American Hannity, he had Dick Morris on tonight, always a wealth of info. How bout that Billary add? It's only gonna get worse for Billary.
Posted by: jeff at March 20, 2007 1:19 AM

This is not a "news" site. It is Olbermann Watch dedicated to Krazy Keith and the 60 Minute Cyclone/Hour O' Spin. If you want news, I highly recommend Fox News.com the #1 News Channel, Drudge Report and Micheal Savage.com.
Posted by: royalking at March 22, 2007 12:36 PM

_______________________________________________________________________

11.) The Olber-Obsessed ,when faced with the fact that Fox News is just as partisan as Olbermann, repeatedly claim that their only beef with Olbermann is that he doesn’t admit he’s Liberal and the MSNBC website calls him an ‘anchor’ while his show is mainly commentary. Like anyone watching Olbermann (left, right, or otherwise) wouldn’t be able to determine the nature of the content by simply watching it. C’mon, I thought right wingers were supposed to give the general public more credit than that!
_______________________________________________________________________

Eitherway, truth in advertising would be nice from MSNBC.
Posted by: cee at March 20, 2007 2:34 PM

If you're so outraged about truth-telling, why don't you ask your cult-leader Olbermann why he presents such an unbalanced "news" program and why there's never anyone who tells the ENTIRE story on his program? You're a hypocrite of the worst order.
Posted by: Brandon at March 17, 2007 4:34 PM

_______________________________________________________________________

12.) The Olber-Obsessed use racial slurs, homophobic comments, and insults liberals’ ‘manliness’. ________________________________________________________________________

John Gibson's machine had its say
Evidently Olby's quite gay
He'll lisp "Mithter Bush"
Then grab Musto's tush
Blow Rocca and call it a day
Posted by: Katy Turic at January 14, 2007 10:56 PM

When's the last time you got arrested after being butt f---ed?
Posted by: Rico at January 14, 2007 6:55 PM

"Why do liberal men wear thong underware in front of children?"
Because they have nothing to hide...
Posted by: Cecelia at January 20, 2007 6:48 PM

Tariq ibn-Ziyad,
Hew Muslim scumbag, how did it feel knowing My Spanish ancestors was the only terrirtory to free itself from Islamic rul. We turned the Mosque in Cordoba into a Church.
We burned Korans and sh-tted on them you turban head.
Hey we burned doem an islamic city in Moprroco and dragged your ugly woman into slavery to pick our sugar in the Americas.
Latin vs. Islamic, we kick your Allah asses hands down!
Posted by: The Joker at March 17, 2007 3:08 AM

Wait till Scooter gets acquitted (funny!). Olby will be in the tub again. PussyKeith is his name...left wing propaganda is his game.
Posted by: Little Feechie at February 20, 2007 9:51 PM

What do you call someone such as yourself whining about other's opinions on a board they support. You don't see me going over to ALFRNAKEN.com do you.
You are a pussy-assed bitch.
Posted by: Brick at February 21, 2007 12:36 PM
_______________________________________________________________________

13.) The Olber-Obsessed proudly display their ‘Love / Hate’ relationship with Olbermann (According to Cecelia). If loving someone while simultaneously hating them isn’t the definition of ‘Obsessed’ I really don’t know what is.
_______________________________________________________________________

No one was watching him when we started writing about him [in Fall of 2004]. He had about 100,000-odd viewers. I thought Keith was the most interesting, controversial, dynamic person on TV. -Robert Cox (in the Greatest Article Ever Written)
Posted by: at March 15, 2007 1:00 PM

How profound, freud.... Olby Watchers and Olby fans flock here and not only find Olbermann interesting, controversial and dynamic,...misguided....askew.... but often find non-MSNBC staffer/political opponents the same.
Posted by: Cecelia at March 15, 2007 2:36 PM

Speaking of "over your head", love-hate relationships are utterly normal,…

Posted by: Cecelia at March 15, 2007 5:42 PM

_______________________________________________________________________

14.) The Olber-Obsessed , when faced with the obvious facts about the Bush administration, they repeatedly claim that ‘Bush doesn’t matter’ and ‘my world doesn’t revolve around Bush.’ Does Clinton matter more than Bush now that he’s been out of office for 7 years? Does your world revolve around Clinton? Apparently it does.
_______________________________________________________________________

Sorry, but Bush isn't focal point of everyone's life. Only Loons are obssesed with Bush. Most people don't care about him and go on with their lives, whethere they approve of him or not. I know people that voted against and don't support Bush and they tell me that you Bush obssesed loons are annoying. They agree with your criticism but not you focus. They have other things going on in their lives. Get a life!
Posted by: King Ghido at March 13, 2007 1:32 PM

_______________________________________________________________________

15.) And finally, the Olber-Obsessed (as if it wasn’t already apparent with items 1-14) are just not real bright folks, especially when they try to communicate with each other.
_______________________________________________________________________

> I guess Annie Coulter's little play on her radio show
Ann Coulter has a radio show now? Who's doing your research? Keith Olbermann?
Posted by: johnny dollar at March 15, 2007 11:25 PM

> Sorry johnny, I heard the clip on YOUR site, I assumed it was 'her' radio show.
Sorry jeff, there IS no clip on this site with Ann Coulter talking about Olby's glasses. I don't even think there's a clip here of Ann Coulter talking about anything.
Posted by: johnny dollar at March 16, 2007 12:39 AM

> Johnny, the clip has been removed, I went bact to find it. It was sometime last month. I only heard the clip once, I just remember her saying olby had the worst glasses in the world.

Jeff you are not telling the truth. There was never a clip on this site of Ann Coulter talking about Olby's "worst glasses in the world". And no such clip was ever removed. You are very wrong about this and you should apologize to Mr Cox, the webmaster of this site, the #1 Keith Olbermann blog in the world, for accusing him of removing a clip just because you can't accurately remember its contents.
Posted by: johnny dollar at March 16, 2007 1:15 AM

OK Jeff, I have to get some sleep so I'll stop playing around. The "glasses" clip can be found here:
http://www.olbermannwatch.com/archives/2007/02/keith_kontrakt.php

And it ain't Ann Coulter. ;)
Posted by: johnny dollar at March 16, 2007 1:55 AM

johnny, so I had the wrong womans name, Ive been trying to find, I knew I heard it. Mikey has already called me a liar 20 times and is dancing all over his apartment like he does when olby is coming on. I was wrong about the woman's name and I am sorry for that, I will await your apology for saying it doesn't exhist. Thanks for finding it.
Posted by: jeff at March 16, 2007 2:03 AM

I think "typekey" will run people off, it doesn't seem to be user friendly. I registered, went to my e-mail box and I had 3 different registration e-mails, all with different numbers! I tried one of them twice, didn't work either time. Which name goes in the posting box, our screen name or our real name?
Posted by: royalking at March 20, 2007 12:50 PM

testing 123
Posted by: jeff at February 21, 2007 4:27 PM

_______________________________________________________________________

…And before you try to slam me for posting this compilation let me drop some knowledge on you: It didn’t take long. About 5 minutes to come up with the 15 observations and about 35 minutes to compile the data. 40 minutes is about the same time it takes the Olber-Obsessed to come up with a way to insult Olbermann’s make-up, glasses, or dick size. And I wasn’t cherry picking. I took examples from only a handful of days, just think what I could have done with 3-4 years worth of archives! And don’t accuse me of taking posts out of context. These posts would mean the exact same thing regardless of context and you know it!

Now, bear in mind, I’ve said nothing in this post in support of Olbermann. I’m not an Olbermann Fan. I don’t watch Olbermann. If you’ve seen one show, you’ve seen them all-which makes the daily recaps here seem even more pointless. I don’t watch a lot of political-based TV, but when I do, it’s usually a blend of Dobbs, Scarborough, Maher, and a little Jon Stewart or O’Reilly thrown in for comedy relief. But, predictably, the Olber-Obsessed will assume I am lying because the one underlying trait that all Olber-Obsessed possess is the undying belief that if you don’t speak out against Olbermann, then you must be an Olbyloon. Which is interesting, since 99.9 % of Americans don’t speak out against Olbermann, then the Olber-Obsessed are truly living on Olby Planet.

The real irony here that the Olber-Obsessed don’t seem to grasp is that in their bitter misplaced hatred of Olbermann, they have become him. The difference? He has a TV show and fans, all the Olber-Obsessed have is this website. The Olber-Obsessed worst fear is to be called out for being hypocritical by an impartial observer with no dog in the fight. Now, I admit, I do have a ‘dog’ in the fight. The dog that bites hypocrites on the Ass!

I don’t care if the Olber-Obsessed read or heed this post. Their pathology runs too deep. This is mainly for the unbiased free-thinkers who come here, if there are still any.

I can’t wait to see the Olber-Obsessed scramble to deflect the light of truth, like cockroaches under a beam from a flashlight. After all, they are obsessed, right? I’m sure the ‘monkey see’ ‘monkey do’ copycat posts will follow.

…And I’m not saying those who you refer to as ‘Olbyloons’ aren’t without their faults. I’ll just leave that to the Olber-Obsesssed to point out. I know you guys won’t disappoint me!

I decided to repost my top 15 list in case anybody missed it from yesterday. Plus it gives me the extra weekend exposure, thanks John-Bob!

I also decided to repost with the quotes spaced apart for easier reading. I know, I know, Olber-Obsessed, the single spacing is too much like reading a book. Something you’re not accustomed to.

No, I’m not an OlbyLoon, No I’m not a communist, No I’m not a fascist, No I’m not gay (not that there’s anything wrong with that), No I’m not a hypocrite, and lastly, No I’m not Mike or Coward Watch. I’m not even a registered Democrat, I’m an Independent-In name and in practice. But if it makes you feel better to think me any or all of those things, have at it, you’re only adding to your self-delusion.

For any Olber-Obsessed that thinks the best defense is a strong offense (which is most of you) why don’t you try defending your comments I’ve held up in the light instead of attacking me?

And for those of you who are obsessed with who I am, it’s clear you can’t attack the message, so you try to attack the messenger. Typical Olber-Obsessed: If you can’t ‘thingify’ something (identify and label something on your own terms-OlbyLoon, Leftist, Etc) you don’t even know where you stand on the issues.

Let’s take a look at some of the more predictable Olber-Obsessed responses:

¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬________________________________________________________________________
Speaking of which, I think I may need to add "truth-syndicates" "list" to my ongoing series on how to spot an Olbyloon.
Posted by: Brandon at March 22, 2007 9:29 PM

(See Item #1)

Truth Syndicate,
Is Coward watch. Most of the exchanges were with him. I think CW is a member of the Kult of Keith!
Posted by: Rodan at March 22, 2007 9:31 PM

(Exchange ‘Mikey’ with ‘CW’ and see Item #2, Also see item # 1)

Gee, I wonder who it was that wasted their whole day making one of the most idiotic posts ever on this blog? It wasn't coward watch. One hint, he is the biggest hypocrit, by far, that has ever posted on this blog. I could, easily, counter every single one of those comments with more rediculous "Olbyloon" comments,but, I have better things to do. This person calls himself an "stock analyist" and only posts here in between "transactions". I guess he had no transactions to do today because I gaurantee you that took him all day, just another one of his bare faced lies. I'll give him credit for one thing, it was slightly entertaining.
Posted by: royalking at March 22, 2007 11:28 PM

(See Items #1, #2, #8, #9)

Funny, I don't see any spelling errors in the above posts. How does that foot feel in your ass?
Posted by: royalking at March 23, 2007 12:59 AM

(See Item #9) Just because you don’t see them, doesn’t mean they aren’t there…

lil mikey, for someone who supposedly didn't waste their whole day on that idiotic post you seem to be strangely defending it, again, refer to my 12:59 post. This time read it twice very carefully. Imagine you are watching Ulbermahn.
Posted by: royalking at March 23, 2007 1:24 AM

(See Item #2)

…it only appeared in whatever idiot spent obscene amounts of time on his demented project before your post.

Posted by: Grammie at March 23, 2007 2:22 AM

(See item #8)

Obscene Amount(s) of time? C’mon, Grammie, aren’t you the one here who bragged to Sharon about working the night shift here at OlbermannWatch? What do the folks in the South call someone who works but doesn’t get paid for it? Just because someone is better at something than you, doesn’t mean they spend more time at it. You’re just mad because I called you out for positioning yourself on the ‘High Ground’ next to someone who said ‘Butt f---ed.’ That’s some pretty High Ground you’re on there Grandma.

I love the business of pointing out how Olby Watchers are obsessed by going back, digging out old posts, and cut-n-pasting them... :D

Posted by: Cecelia at March 23, 2007 4:51 PM

See Item #8

Old posts? A majority of the posts are from OlbermannWatch 2.0 (Meaning from the last 2 weeks.) A few others are from as waaaaay far back as Jan and Feb. Oooh that’s digging.

Dear Truth Syndicate,
Dang, why didn't you let me publish your comment as a guest post. Anyone who puts in that much work deserves a place on the main page. Email me if you are interested.
Posted by: Robert Cox at March 22, 2007 9:15 PM

Thanks for the offer, Bob, but it really wasn’t much work at all. About 40 minutes is all. I read fast, type fast, and think fast. That’s why I get bored debating the Olber-Obsessed, they take soooo bloody long to respond, I get bored. Oh and the Laptop, Wi-Fi, Cable Modem, and Caffeine doesn’t hurt either.

PS-Keep your sense of humor, it’s one of your more admirable traits!

Life is all about the choices we make. I had to choose. Watch CountDown with Keith Olbermann or watch Beavis and Butt-Head Do America.

I picked Beavis and Butt-Head Do America. Judge me by that if you must.

Hard to believe Beavis and Butt-Head Do America is over 10 years old. Ten years ago Keith was in his early 40s and low man at ESPN .Tens years ago Keiths wife was 12 and in the six grade

Olby is also math challenged... he counts Rudi's marriage to his current wife as 2 marriages (1 for Rudi, 1 for his wife). The correct total is 5 marriages.

"slobber over B.J."

Purfect line to describe Oralmann! :-)

Keith isn't married; he is living in sin with his galpal. Her parents must be overjoyed.

Rumors are that Olbermann has known Katie since was 14. He's been banging here since she was 15.
That's the word on da streetz!

Posted by: The Truth Syndicate at March 23, 2007 8:59 PM

brevity
One entry found for brevity.

Main Entry: brev·i·ty
Pronunciation: 'bre-v&-tE
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -ties
Etymology: Latin brevitas, from brevis
: shortness of duration; especially : shortness or conciseness of expression

So a bit of the Woody Allen syndrome is what youre trying to say?

Does Keith know about the Purple Pill?

Hard News ?

So he waited for Katie to reach a f---able age huh? So what happens when she gets "old"? Is he waiting for Dan Patrick's teen daughters to reach a f---able age?

In the two nights since some idiot writing for the Cornell Alumni Magazine falsely declared that Keith Odormoronn "has tightened his grip on second place, especially among younger viewers," Odormoronn has finished a humiliating FOURTH place out of FIVE in total viewers and in the key, significant, critical, all-important, much-loved demo on Wednesday night and an abysmal THIRD place out of FIVE last night. Can we expect the fool from the Cornell Alumni Magazine to make an immediate correction to his fraud?

T.S. wrote: I'm not an Olbermann fan, I don't watch Olbermann. And then went to spew stuff like 'if you seen one show you've seen them all'. And 99.9% don't speak out against Olbermann.

Okay with this fair minded dribble does one believe that he only took 1 hour to put his post together?

Maybe an out of work hack for Newsday? Maybe he just got back on the U.F.O. back to Olby Planet? Maybe in his mid-forties living in his parents basement?

It's just makes me laugh that someone who does not watch or care about Olbermann because in his post says he could be watching Hannity & Colmes or Paula Zahn and get the same thing. Would spend any time here.

Think About It!

Someone with talents like that spending his time here? When he could be banging out the next 'War & Peace' in under an hour and a half? But then again he did do pretty much a repeat of yesterday's post.

Copy & Paste anyone?

But thats not what I came here to talk about! You know when somebody go's on Countdown to plug a book, that book just shoots straight to the top and stays there because the power of Olbermann!!!!!!

Don't believe me eh? YOU FOOLS!

Why just a few weeks ago Marvin Kitman was on with his Masterpiece 'The Man Who Would Not Shut Up'! and I'm sure there's not doubt that book rose straight to the top of the charts!!! Let's look and you Olby haters can all weep!!!!

Right now at Amazon.com "The Man who would not shut up' is at Sales Rank # ...........13,687!?!?!?!?!? Wait this must be wrong! a mistake, a misprint! Maybe Jerry Falwell brought Amazon? Yeah thats right! Let's go over to Barnes & Noble where it will at least be in the top 50!!!!!!!

Barnes & Noble 'The Man Who Would Not Shut up' by Marvin Kitman ranked at #...................40,437?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

Well you know what the good news is Olby Loons. That book should be showing up at places like 'Ollie's Bargain Basement Book Stores' real soon!!!!!!!

So almost a To Catch a Predator episode?

WHEEEE!!!!

News Corp. joins the "SECULAR EXTREMIST MEDIA" i.e. G.E.-MicroSoft-NBC profit making opportunity in providing a YouTube alternative.

I can't wait for you Bush Supporters, that means you Johnny and Robert Sucks-Cox, to start boycotting and yelling at Murdoch (that means the billionaire that ADMITTED TO trying to influence the USA elections, for you Bush Supporters) :

DAMN YOU BILL GATES!!
DAMN YOU MR. IMMEL!!
DAMN YOU MicroSoft-NBC!!!

GAWD BLESS AND MAY OUR LORD BILLDO LAY HIS HANDS UPON BILL GATES AND MR. IMMEL!

JOIN ME Bush Supporters IN MY OUTRAGED BLOW_VIATERY !!

Truth Syndicate. All I can say is thank you for taking the time and effort to lay it all out the way you did.

codas,
So how's it been in your Mosque lately?

Rodan,
Probably not as fun as your Klan meeting.

Truth Syndicate, They have no response with any substance. As usual.

You know, I don't think someone liked my first installment in the series of "How to Spot an Olbyloon" posts. Just wait til they see what I'm working on next.

Odd...

The Bush Supporters, that means you Rodan, haven't learned that dissent and rejection of (R) Bu$hwipery doesn't equal support for terrorists.

Keep repeating the Dick's line:
If the Democrats win, the terrorists win.

BUUUUUSHWIPE!!

He is of no consequence and I think he knows it.

Posted by: Grammie at March 23, 2007 12:48 AM

You are a poor excuse for a whatever it is you think you are. "No Daddy don't" was small potatos next to the insults you have given here, with your superiority complex, along with your victimhood. You have a sense of humor, so that keeps me interested, but to think that you offer any substance above anyone else is a laugh in itself. You push for answers and offer none yourself. As far as me wanted to be accepted as a "player" here, I come here for my own ammusement which I get plenty of thanks to know it all blowhards like you giving me a great example of how not to talk down to people. But you beg to be talked down to, because you think yourself above it all. You are not. Maybe you are so sentive about my little joke because you as well as I know incest is no laughing matter. Well Janet I'm sorry if I offended you but...................!

codas,
I'm Lebanese you idiot.
Unlike you I have family that was killed by Muslims. You support those savages.
Why?

Codas,
Can you explain to me the Leftist-Islamic alliance?

"BU$HWIPE"- I get it... Average American A$$hole put a dollar sign in the middle of the President's name!

Isn't that a hoot?!?

I can only hope he put$ one in for one of hi$ heroe$ - George $oro$... you know, the guy who made so much $$$$$ from that eeeeeeevil HALIBURTON!

Gotta love that liberal creativity!

Rodan, Your being Lebanese or having family members killed by Muslims is your business. Why you think because someone doesn't agree with your politics that they are going to mosque is dumb. I'm sure if I said I was catholic this would matter to you? I doubt it. You hate Muslims and liberals? Deep.

Robert Cox.

I think your site looks great and i am glad it's here. The fact that you offer links to both pro and anti Olbermann shows me you want dialogue and opinions offeres from both sides of the street.

Some fascinating comments by OW's resident O'Reilly fan 'Factor' earlier today today at 2:02:

1) - "either bash Olbermann or liberals, or shut up": Translation - "While it's a sin to make this site 'BushWatch' or 'O'ReillyWatch, but making it 'LiberalWatch' is perfectly OK."

2) - "your ideas have failed on the world stage": And how have YOUR ideas faired "on the world stage" over the last six years?

3) - Factor to Mrs Philby: "we have enough liberals here already": Translation - "One 'liberal' is one too many!"

4) - "no one cares what a socialist thinks about George Bush: Maybe Factor, but a lot of Americans DO care what "clear thinkers" like Mrs. Philby think.

5) - "George Bush is a John F. Kennedy style democrat": Factor, are you saying President Kennedy was an incompetent bumbler too?

6) - Factor to Mrs. Philby: "we have enough liberals here already": Translation..."you're WAY to smart and articulate for us here, so please go away."

7) - Mrs. R Adrian Philby, in the words of the great prophet Rosie: Translation..."we on the right wing have found a freak show on left that we can use to deflect away all of those pesky rational arguments that we just can't win....so we're just gonna holler out "but ROSIE, your 'prophet' said", over and over again."

8) - Another cute 'Factor' comment a little later at 4:19: "Facts 'beat' liberals time and time again.....ah yes, The great "Liberals vs Facts" showdown...final score - Facts 100, Liberals 99. But he forgot to mention the OTHER showdown which ended in Facts 100, Conservatives 20.
Now lets get back to the more relevant 'Liberals' vs 'Conservatives' showdown. It seems the oddsmakers are picking the 'Liberals' by 100:1 in this one.

After all, facts tend to have a known liberal bias.

Rodan,
Probably not as fun as your Klan meeting.

Posted by: codas at March 23, 2007 11:19 PM
At least people that attend klan mettings take showers,don't have dirty feet and they don't wear dirty night shirts. Also, the fires are good for roasting marshmellows.

>>"BU$HWIPE"- I get it... Average American A$$hole put a dollar sign in the middle of the President's name!

Isn't that a hoot?!?

I can only hope he put$ one in for one of hi$ heroe$ - George $oro$... you know, the guy who made so much $$$$$ from that eeeeeeevil HALIBURTON!

Gotta love that liberal creativity!

Let me explain it to you Bush Supporters in detail, again.
George Soros' FUND, it's the FUND you Bush Supporters, it's the FUND MANAGER, investing
$62 dollars to make $1 dollar within 3 months means zilch, ZERO, nothing.

But at the same time, the benevolent News Corp. announcing a new partnership with EVEEEEL G.E.-MicroSoft-NBC means nothing to you OUTRAGED PIOUS BILLDO$.

BITCH ALL YOU WANT Bush Supporters.
THE SMART MONEY IS MOVING ON.
(that means not YOU Bush Supporters)

Anon 12:25 on Klan meetings: "at least people that attend Klan meetings take showers, don't have dirty feet"...

So, do you fellas play full strip poker together, or do you just stop with each other's feet?

Lets see here, Olbermann actually awards himself a WPITW spot and nobody here offers any praise for his doing that? But I see you DID award yourselves credit.

I think there is another message here that nobody semed to get:...That you Olby basher people have been taking the WPITW segment WAY too seriously all along!

No you didn't Keith. No you didn't. You would rather devote a full segmant to pet food than on the Iranian Government kidnapping 15 British Soldiers? That's just amazing.

Lets see here, Olbermann actually awards himself a WPITW spot and nobody here offers any praise for his doing that? But I see you DID award yourselves credit.

I think there is another message here that nobody semed to get:...That you Olby basher people have been taking the WPITW segment WAY too seriously all along!

Posted by: Mike at March 24, 2007 12:54 AM

THIS from a guy who has spent the last 24 hours raving over someone (who he couldn't pick out in a police lineup) accusing him of posting under other identities on a blogsite. It's a good thing there's no TWPITW award here with your picture posted and no opportunity provided for you to explain yourself or answer the charge. Not only would you take that "too seriously"...but someone would likely have to provide you CPR...

As for Olbermann's "apology" and "awarding him credit", I was taught that true apologies aren't prefixed or concluded by turning around and pointing your finger back at someone else, as Olbermann did at Beck.

average american a$$hole said:

"BITCH ALL YOU WANT Bush Supporters.
THE SMART MONEY IS MOVING ON.
(that means not YOU Bush Supporters)"

Keep speaking that "truth to power" man! Especially since more people are likely to read your words here than actually watch Odorman's show.

I mean, c'mon- really... last place behind Deal or No Deal? Really? SheeeeSH!

Cecelia, I have to admit, the viciousness of your response startled me a little. I have to admit, I wasn't prepared for that from you. If I hadn't know better, I would have thought I had just attacked you personally. In fact, I would just as soon you had agreed with the lie that "I had been calling you names" the other night. It would make rationalizing your unexplained venom a little easier.

Your personal attack on me in response to that rather innocent post is as good an argument as I can think of as to why some on here choose to post anonomously. Someone else pointed out once that posting anonomously forces the reader to focus on what is being said, rather than who wrote it, which SHOULD be the focus of any comment made in any forum.

As far as WPITW being taken too seriously, you just made my point. YOU waste your time worrying about whether someone, who has his own national forum, like Beck, has a chance to "defend himself" or "answer the charge", but I think I'll worry about something a little more consequential. I think Beck can take care of himself, and he certainly DID deserve the WPITW mention he got.

"as for Olbermann's apology": That was neither an apology, nor was there a need for him to him to apologize for anything. He simply named himself a WPITW, for which he did deserve SOME measure of credit from you people.

As for whether I spent "the last 24 hours raving" , I suggest you take whatever math skills you have and look back at my 'ravings' and tell me again that it went on for "24 hours". I haven't even been home for more than a few hours at a time in the last several days.

If you're now defending a worm like that for what he did in the anonimity and safety of being behind his keyboard, then I have certainly lost some of the respect I had for you.

Gee Mike, you're kind of overreacting to Cecilla's post don't you think? You do think don't you? Oh, that's right. You're an Olbermann fan. If you could think, you wouldn't be here defending him. You'd know he's beyond defense.

The delusional left-wingers probably believe that the latest Iranian hostage situation is all just a big misunderstanding. Yeah, that's the ticket. Their Iranian buddies surely would never do something like that. We can negotiate with them, really. And monkeys are flying out of Olby's fat butt.

Good morning every 1 Ive been up a long time watching the morning news shows to find out how Giliani news has been doing & I wasnt surprised to find out every 1 is talking about all his marriages & his new wives marriages & it is just like Ive been saying his immorals are gonna hurt the Repub party real real bad & some of you people who are CINOs, CONCERVATIVES IN NAME ONLY need toback down & stop pushing this immoral man into our living rooms but I was surprised to find out that the Al Berto Gonzalez thing has gone a lot farther than I suspected it would & I can now say Al Berto Gonzalez needs to resign right now cause hes hurting Pres Bush Pres Bush needs all of his strength to swim v the tide of the antiwar DemocRATS & win in Iraq & he cant have an > round his neck & do that so he needs to go right now & we need to put all our resources in to supporting Pres Bush & the war & we need to encourage Pres Bush to focus more on whats important hes lost site cause every 1 is attacking him on every thing but KEEP THE EYES ON THE PRIZE, that is Iraq cut lose Al Berto Gonazales like a fish stringer with a snake on it. Let him go. Hes not that important dont give bait to the Drive By Media cause theyll fish with it as sure as Monday is the day after Sunday

Al Berto = Al Bertross

Mike,

If you consider it a vicious personal attack for me to say that you've been very upset over being mischaracterized on a blogboard where we couldn't pick YOU out in a police lineup, so it's ironic that you would consider being named WPITW on national television as something we've taken too seriously....then you're more sensitive than *I even imagined... That you would take it that I'm defending the people who accuse you of using various assumed names, makes your words even more ironic.

As for Beck being able to defend himself, Olbermann has given plenty of people who do not have television shows that honor. He once named a woman TWPITW who advanced something called "natural funerals". She later posted here at Olbermann Watch, thinking that this was the way she could tell Olbermann that he had mischaracterized her position.

But then unchallenged accusations and claims are the stuff of Olbermann's entire show and the reason for Olbermann Watch. Yes, I take that seriously. I wouldn't be here otherwise (and I wouldn't be setting my butt down on some site devoted to refuting some conservative media personality in order to tell them they took it all too seriously, instead...).

To The Truth Syndicate:

yawn.

I give Ulbermahn a little credit for naming himself wpitw, at the same time, did he do it because he saw that his hypocrisy was pointed out on Olbermann Watch? I would take pleasure in thinking so,but, why would he start doing that now? How many other lies and mischaracterizations have been pointed out by Bob and John? Hundreds if not more that were much more serious. Was it Producer pressure? New boss pressure? Is he on new meds? Only Ulby knows why, then again, maybe he's asking himself right now, why did I do that? As far as Beck getting it again, hardly the worst thing someone has done. WPITW should be just that, instead, Ulby saves spots on regular occasions for slamming people that don't agree with him or mention his name in a negative way.

You're an Olbermann fan. If you could think, you wouldn't be here defending him. You'd know he's beyond defense.

Posted by: Brandon at March 24, 2007 9:25 AM

And what is it that you defend again?

God I love the Ashleigh Banfield's glasses reference. How can Olbermann possible think these look good on him.

Since we all know he reads this site:

Hey Olbermann, they make you look OLDER and not in the cool Cary Grant way, but the old drunken Harry Carey way. Please do not do your impersonation of Harry Carey when wearing your Bandfield glasses, the girlfriend may mistake you for grandfather. (Instead of who you currently remind her of: her father)

Cecelia:

I just re-read your original 1:32 AM post and I now agree that it was not nearly as 'vicious' as I had characterized it to be at the time. It just goes to show that I should not read this and post on this blog after having been up all day and most of the night.

"It occured to me that I had once called Roger Ailes 'fat ass'". It occured to me?! You mean, it occured to you after Olbermann Watch pointed it out and humiliated you."

You f---ing moron, you have no clue whether he thought of it, watched a re-run of his show, had an aid point it out, or spent his time on this silly blog. You spin just as bad as he does.

Oh and how come no mention of the worst person? Afraid it might make your hero Limbaugh look bad?

I just re-read your original 1:32 AM post and I now agree that it was not nearly as 'vicious' as I had characterized it to be at the time. It just goes to show that I should not read this and post on this blog after having been up all day and most of the night.

Posted by: Mike at March 24, 2007 2:50 PM
?????????

I will fight any f---ing libtard I can find. You make me sick. My buckeyes won and I'm f---ing drunkkkkkkkkk! The KKK should round p the libreals and the Bushhaters and hang them like they did the others. f--- YOU OLBERMANN. I'd sodomize your kids if you had nay and you couldnt' because your dick is orange and limp and only gets hard for Pelosi or BARNEY FRANK.

I'll be at ROCK Botooms in CLeveland if you want to fight YOUF f---ERS!
Oh, and I'm rich as ass! BUCKEEYES!!!!!

I take it back Cecelia, you were actually being wuite the cunt.

So I see in the ratings that Olby got third place again.

What happen to that firm grip on second place?

Let's see how would the nut-roots spin this. I know!

That paid O'Reilly hack Johnny Dollar sprayed WD-40 on the ratings ladder.

Cecelia:

I'm sure you've figured out we've got yet another troll who posted at 8:22.

Mike,

Of course I knew. You'd never misspell "quite"... :D

How 'bout that watching olbermann watch blog. A whole 4 posts already! That's one busy moderator.....

They're about as busy as our new democratic congress has been in their first 100 hr scam, they have done absolutely nothing, O. What a crock.

They're about as busy as our new democratic congress has been in their first 100 hr scam, they have done absolutely nothing, O. What a crock.

Posted by: royalking at March 24, 2007 11:36 PM

Your right in the fact that they haven't done as much as the last congress. They kissed ass every freaking day and then they bent over themselves and let our country be screwed by the biggest whores in the land. If your still defending these crooks you are pathetic and sad.

I am sick of people who are too stuburn to admit that putting their trust in the Bush administration was a major mistake, however well intentioned a supporter was, they should know better by now. AG is a liar. Snow is a liar. Cheney is a liar. The whole bunch of them are trash.

Codas,

Brandon defends a regime that fires people who don't kiss their asses 24/7, silences critics by calling them traitors, advocates imprisoning people WITHOUT CHARGE forever or until they become TOO INSANE TO CHARGE, lying under oath to courts of law and to Congress, treating wounded veterans in conditions that make a field hospital look like the marvel of modern medicine, accuse one side of "political theater" while ENGAGING IN POLITICAL THEATER, obfuscating and spinning the truth to the point where they believe their own spin contrary to all facts, etc., etc.

March 24, 2007 11:48 PM

For the life of me, I can't understand why anyone in their right mind would at this point still claim the "moral highground" like some do here. They slander Olbermann daily while their decider's henchmen lie and rob this country blind. They stole our credibility to the rest of the free world and raped our miltary. As hard as it is for "them" to believe, I feel that the men who fought in Iraq will be some of the loudest voices against "them" in the very near future.

When this blog becomes "Bushwatch" then I'll post about Bush. It's about Keith Olbermann so I post about Keith Olbermann.

And Codas, in case you haven't been paying attention, we're 4 years into this war. How many men and women have fought in this war? And how many do you hear protesting it once they've returned from Iraq? Very, very few. That should TEL you something, but of course it doesn't.

Oh, and one more thing, if Bush is such a liar, why hasn't YOUR Democratic Congress and YOUR Democratic Senate voted to impeach him? If he's the terrible ogre you make him out to be, this criminal you claim he is, than why hasn't Pelosi and company done something to remove him from office?

And Codas, in case you haven't been paying attention, we're 4 years into this war. How many men and women have fought in this war? And how many do you hear protesting it once they've returned from Iraq? Very, very few. That should TEL you something, but of course it doesn't.

Posted by: Brandon at March 25, 2007 12:00 AM

It tells me you haven't been listening very hard. The fact that you can say "we're 4 years into this war" and not be as disgusted as I am tells me something also. Do you think if I said four years ago that we would still be tring to secure Bahgdad I would be considered a "loon"? The people who are the loons are the ones who can't seem to grasp that people like Olbermann and others are in fact the voices of sanity in a terible time in our country. "It's" about Olbermann to you because of Bush and what he has said about him and his administration, and you know it is. You wouldn't be upset with him otherwise. Olbermann has verbalized what, I know this is hard for you to comprehend"THE MAJORITY" of this country now knows to be true.

Oh, and one more thing, if Bush is such a liar, why hasn't YOUR Democratic Congress and YOUR Democratic Senate voted to impeach him? If he's the terrible ogre you make him out to be, this criminal you claim he is, than why hasn't Pelosi and company done something to remove him from office?

Posted by: Brandon at March 25, 2007 12:01 AM
Onw reason is they have more class and respect for the damage it would do to the country than the Republican Klan who impeached Clinton. Another reason is it is not the solution. History will impeach not only Bush, but also his supporters Brandon.

Brandon defends a regime that fires people who don't kiss their asses 24/7, silences critics by calling them traitors, advocates imprisoning people WITHOUT CHARGE forever or until they become TOO INSANE TO CHARGE, lying under oath to courts of law and to Congress, treating wounded veterans in conditions that make a field hospital look like the marvel of modern medicine, accuse one side of "political theater" while ENGAGING IN POLITICAL THEATER, obfuscating and spinning the truth to the point where they believe their own spin contrary to all facts, etc., etc.

Posted by: at March 24, 2007 11:48 PM
anon, could you be any more uninformed? You should seriously think about getting your news from a more accurate source. Have you always defended our enemy? And Codas, in case you haven't been paying attention, we're 4 years into this war. How many men and women have fought in this war? And how many do you hear protesting it once they've returned from Iraq? Very, very few. That should TEL you something, but of course it doesn't.

Posted by: Brandon at March 25, 2007 12:00 AM
I can think of one officer who protested the war in Iraq, he's headed for the brig.

The idea that because I am an American and my country is at war means that I have to look the other way and shut up when I know that the people making the decisions for the war have been consistantly wrong is not an idea that I can hold in my head for long. Long after Bush has gone America will be left to live with the results of the neocon approach to the rest of the world. Is the "global Jihad" as serious an issue as Russia or China, North Korea or our immigration problem? Because I think Bush and his supporters have misplaced priorities and f--- this country up beyond any shadow of a doubt doesn't make me unpatriotic or less of an American than anyone else. I stand by my original assement of Bush from the beginning. The job of being president is way over his head. And we as a country suffer for it. As far as the soldiers fighting in Iraq an Afgahnistan I will let them speak for themselves. However, in this country, politicians and the military are servants of this democracy, not the other way around. If you feel it should be otherwise, maybe you have confused the U.S.A for some place else.

Codas>

OUCH!

Can't wait for the comments from the Olby-obsessed to tell you what an Olby-loyalist you are, and how "your hatred of Bush will consume you"

I see that Codas and company haven't answered the questions I've posed. If Bush is such a liar and traitor, etc., why haven't the Democrats moved to impeach him? They have the votes. If Bush is as unpopular as you claim he is, then surely if Pelosi, et. al. began impeachment hearings then the public would support them, right? So why haven't they moved on this? What's wrong with your Democratic leaders that they won't listen to the "voice of the people"?

Can't answer that one can you?

royalking

f--- YOU AND THE HORSE YOU RODE IN ON!

That is all.

Brandon: Codas DID answer you question at 12:10. Another reason impeachment is not on the table is because the Democrats DON'T have the votes, as you keep claiming. In addition, Codas never claimed that the majority of Americans want Bush impeached. He just said the guy is unpopular with the majority....which is true.

If you'll clear up your head and recall, the majority of Americans were against the impeachment of Clinton as well, but the Republicans in the House charged ahead anyway.

So Keith's never been to Iraq?
That qualifies him as a hack
He'll just criticize
While a brave soldier dies
To protect his fat ass from attack

I regularly read the Democratic websites. The vast majority of posters on those sites desperately want Bush impeached. But the Dem leaders don't listen to their rank and file. WHY? If you think someone is so awful and has committed so many crimes why not remove him from office? Wouldn't the "trauma" of an impeachment trial be outweighed for the good of the country that would occur if he were removed since you all seem to think he's done so much damage to this country anyway? Sorry but your arguments don't make a lick of sense. Not that I expected them to. This is like the pathetic argument concerning the war authorization vote, "We voted to give him authorization, not for him to invade Iraq." Yeah, like there's some sort of difference between the two. Not only can the Dems not justify WHY they voted for that war, they're now coming up with a weak, pathetic excuse to explain why they did. How stupid were they that they didn't now that a war authorization vote meant a vote to invade Iraq? I think you need to demand more accountability from your Democratic leaders but you seem obsessed with the GOP. You can't admit that your own party is riddled with liars and wheezles and in the case of a few, thieves (money in a freezer? anyone?).

So Keith's never been to Iraq?
That qualifies him as a hack
He'll just criticize
While a brave soldier dies
To protect his fat ass from attack

Posted by: Katy Turic at March 25, 2007 11:40 AM
It's obvious you have never listened to a word Keith has said. Your fat ass feels safe because you support sending young man overseas to keep your political party looking "tough". No brains and fat asses rule your world.

I think you need to demand more accountability from your Democratic leaders but you seem obsessed with the GOP. You can't admit that your own party is riddled with liars and wheezles and in the case of a few, thieves (money in a freezer? anyone?).

Posted by: Brandon at March 25, 2007 11:59 AM
And like most of your side on this site, you can't accept an answer unles it is the response that you yourself determine is the correct one. Then you look for one incident to now justify that there is no room for opposition to your positions. You are desperate in your defense of your party, who some people understood could in fact impeach a president, rally the country behind slogans, slander men who have fought in wars if they don't agree with you politicaly, but cannot lead. I repeat. Republicans cannot lead. Did Reagen lead? Yes, right out of beruit. Is he a cut and run liberal?

So tell me Codas, why did Conyers promise impeachment to you easily duped Dems before the election and then removed all discussion of it from his website after the election? How many people voted for the Dems hoping, thinking, that they'd move to impeach Bush? And can you explain to me how a party which has control of both the House & the Senate "doesn't have the votes" to move to impeach?

So tell me Codas, why did Conyers promise impeachment to you easily duped Dems before the election and then removed all discussion of it from his website after the election? How many people voted for the Dems hoping, thinking, that they'd move to impeach Bush? And can you explain to me how a party which has control of both the House & the Senate "doesn't have the votes" to move to impeach?

Posted by: Brandon at March 25, 2007 12:29 PM
Impeaching the president seems to be more important to you than it is to the democrats who you insist should impeach. Why? Because of your political motivations and priorities. Like the Republican hit squad that impeached Clinton, you and they would always want what is in your best interests politicaly "Although they are always wrong, judging from Clintons popularity and the last election" as opposed to what is in the best interests of our country. I think the investigations now and after Bush has left office will be sufficient to show the country, most of whom know already what a horrible administration we have had. Keep grasping and looking for excuses or pointing your finger away from the mess that your party has made. Rove, Bush, Cheney, AG, the whole lot of them are already impeached in the hearts and minds of the majority of this country.

That has to be the most half-assed and illogical "explanation" i.e., excuse, I've ever seen. You now you've been betrayed by your Democratic leaders. You know they've lied their collective butts off, and so now you're apologizing for them and creating "excuses" for them, just like you do for Olbermann. Tell me, on your income taxes where you have to declare a profession, do you put, "Apologist"? Or "Comedian?"

That has to be the most half-assed and illogical "explanation" i.e., excuse, I've ever seen. You now you've been betrayed by your Democratic leaders. You know they've lied their collective butts off, and so now you're apologizing for them and creating "excuses" for them, just like you do for Olbermann. Tell me, on your income taxes where you have to declare a profession, do you put, "Apologist"? Or "Comedian?"

Posted by: Brandon at March 25, 2007 1:12 PM

Like I've said...... No answer is good enough. Dodge, redirect, insult, but never can you defend what YOU supported.

Well its attack ATTACK A T T A C K today all day & no one from Pres Bushs office or on his side is making any good arguments today I dont know whats wrong some times I think theyve decided well its less than 2 years why even both it all makes me very depressed on ABC G Will who is about as good a conservative as their is what talking about what an idiot Al Berto Gonzalez is & he is to be sure & I wish hed quit today to end all of this but it makes things bad for the Pres to hear good conservatives say things like that & on Ruseert whose usually real balanced they have Spector whose got to be the biggest weak sister theyve got & then of course Hagel whose sort of a traitor to the cause any way all against Itaq & talking about how sure the places in Bagdad where theyre more troops now are doing fine but theirs more violence where they tool the troops from & is any 1 saying any thing FOR Pres Bush I dont think so. Rice is messing up Egypt Chaneys disappeared again & I can only hope hes talking to his daughter Mary about being a lesbian & then wheres every bodys on this site favorite prince Giliani not saying a word probably out filing for divorce again. Friends were in bad BAD shape in the party & for conservatives & some 1 needs to do something pretty soon or were not going to be controlling the Yazoo City Pet Pound much longer & then well have anohter 40 years of like FDR cause the DemocRATS once they get in & start doing things like Medicare & voting & giving out $ know how to make people come back & vote for them we had a chance to stop it all but were loosing that chance fast & some body needs to do some thing like getting Pres Bush to get some good smart people together & tossing Al Berto out on his butt & winning this war. I dont want FDR like stuff for my children & there children. BTW I know lots of people in PA & they all say even the Repubs that Spector needs worth the sweat on a woodpecker & I believe it we need Santorum to beat him in the primary & I guess my Ohios hopeless cause of all the corruption in the Repub party & dont we have a loser in the Governors & Senators office so we need to get busy here. My advice to everny 1 is to get off you duff, get Pres Bush back on the road & stop all this bad stauff. I hope youre Sunday goes good & that you spend some time praising God & working for Pres Bsuh.

Rudy, you say the Democrats are going to "do things like Medicare": What do mean by that. Are you saying the Republicans arn't "doing things like Medicare"?

Or are you one of those saying that you want to sit by and do nothing while Old Folks who have worked hard all their life have to do without basic medical care because they can't buy insurance?

And you're the one who keeps invoking 'morals'. How moral is taking away medical care from seniors? You keep invoking 'God'. Do you think that's what God wants?

Brandon, only in you're mind have "we been betrayed by our Democratic leaders". Codas keeps telling you how you keep looking for answers YOU think we should give. You keep telling us how YOU think we should feel. Problem is, you don't understand Liberal thought at all, and that makes it impossible for YOU to decide how we should feel.

Very few Democrats ran on a platform of impeachment, and the majority of ordinary Americans who happen to be Democrats are not clammoring for impeachment either, so the hypocrisy you keep alluding to simply isn't happening.

One more point about impeachment. If you impeach Bush, what are we left with? I don't know anyone left of the EXTREME right who wants that.

Well a liberal who wants God in government your a bird of a kind, Mike, & i bet you really dont you just want to make a Repub look bad in front of other people & guess what its not working out too well for you cause we can all see right thru you & youre tricks its just like Brandon said see above your not Mike from the plant are you.

Rudy, I asked you 2 direct questions and you didn't answer either one. Instead you launched an attack on my motives and accused me of being a 'plant'.

I will ask you them again: 1)- Are you, and people like you in favor of denying basic medical care from seniors who cannot buy medical insurance. 2) - Do you think God wants America to be like that?

And yes, Rudy...I am definitely 'Mike', and not a 'plant'.

I read a fascinating letter today in my local paper that 'possibly' gave some insight into the difference between liberal and conservative thought.

This particular letter discussed Rush Limbaugh's recent criticism of John Edward's so call 'hypocrisy'. The writer was defending Limbaugh on the grounds that since both men were rich, Limbaugh's failure to advocate for the poor was not hypocritical, but Edwards position as an advocate for the poor was indeed hypocritical...because Edwards is also rich.

I certainly saw no 'hypocrisy' in either position....but in my view, Limbaugh's position certainly isn't an admirable one. On the other hand, Edward's position certainly is. The only real question is whether Edward's advocating for the poor is 'hypocritical' or not.

This made me wonder if some conservatives REALLY believe it is not possible for people to empathize with, and therefore to lobby for...folks with a lesser lot in life than themselves....for Genuine humanitarian reasons? I personally know that they can, but possibly some conservatives believe this just isn't possible...therefore, the commonly heard 'hypocrite' label.

Well you didnt answer my question I asked you if you were the Mike that works at the plant with me & always plays dirty little tricks on people but if you want to know my answers theyre its the families job & God wants the US of AMerica to believe in him & worship his only name as if you really care & your right about impeachment tho cause it would be wrong to impeach Pres Bush probably the best Pres since Pres Lincoln & maybe more but we sure dont want Chaney cause theirs something real wrong with that family & the Greeks say when a fish stinks smell the head cause what ever happens in Chaneys family is his fault altho I think its really his wife that brought that lesbian stuff into the door & shes mean to. Still I know 2 things that 1 we dont want a man like that to lead the US of America and 2 he needs to stay home & watch what his wife & daughter do with tha t new baby so she wont be lesiban to & 3 when Chaney stops all those goings on he can be Pres but not before its like all GIlianis divorces & his kids not talking to him but about him.

I'm the one dodging? Uh, no, that would be You hate Bush with a vengence. You claim he's the worst president ever. Yet you don't want to impeach him? You call him a traitor, a criminal, and you still don't want to impeach him? You claim it's for the "good" of the country but yet you can't explain why it wouldn't be better to remove such a threat to our democracy from office. That leads to only one logical conclusion no matter how the resident libs here try to spin it: Bush isn't as bad as you make him out to be or you and every other liberal in this country would be pushing for impeachment. And don't tell me that there aren't plenty who hunger for it. I read Kos and DU and Talking Points every day. I know what I see there. I know what I see on THIS board from the resident liberals. But now you want to claim you don't want that at all? Why? It would take away your ablity to bitch and moan about the president and those evil Republicans? Tell me, what exactly have the Dems done since they've been in power? Anyone?

Gosh Rudy, you're so smart...you caught me!

I NEVER thought you'd figure out that I was "the Mike that works at the plant with you & always plays dirty little tricks on people".

You just can'r get away with ANYTHING around here!

Brandon, Brandon, Brandon: I'm not really sure if you were talking to me, Codas, or both of us, but here's MY answer.

Both me and Codas stated the opinion of the typical Democrat, or 'liberal', which is (and was)....that they are not clammoring for impeachment at this time. The TYPICAL Democrat, or Independent in America today disapproves of George Bush, but is NOT YET in favor of impeachment.

I NEVER said I wasn't personally in favor of impeachment!

I personally would love to see the guy get impeached AND removed from office....but ONLY if we could sweep Cheney out with him at the same time...but you se, I'm not the TYPICAL Democrat, so clearly I won't get my way, will I? Meanwhile, I see no hypocrisy, nor do I have any ill will towards the majority who favor a less radical approach to the problem.

You're arguments are very convoluted.

My wife reminded me his names Mick anyway so Im sorry once he put peanut butter in some 1s after work shoes & hes always doing stuff like that I wish theyd fire him.

My arguments aren't half as convoluted as the "we don't want to put America" through that crap Codas was trying to spew earlier. Admit it, you've been had by your leaders who promised you one thing and then delivered, or more accurately, failed to deliver on their promises. That's politics boys!

It takes a real brave person to say "f--- you" and not use a name, a true olbyloon. Brandon, I can answer your earlier question since he didn't, he is an apologist day in and day out, you have to be funny to be a comedian.....

Brandon: "I read Kos and DU and Talking Points every day."

Why?.....I don't!

And that would make me far more in touch with what the rank and file libs are thinking about Mike. Since you love to discuss "issues" why do you avoid these places exactly?

Because Brandon, I don't believe these are necessarily the "rank and file" democrats speaking on those sites. I believe, on average, they represent more of an extreme left wing agenda than the typical rank and file Democrats actually are.

The other reason I don't go to those sites is that I have no interest in "singing with the choir". My ideas are my ideas...and are not derived from anyone else.

So are you saying that the views expressed here at Olbermannwatch DO represent the "typical rank and file" Democrats? Funny, I just can't seem to find a "moderate" Democrat site. You'd think out of the millions of people who have internet access that there'd be something out there for the "moderates" you claim make-up the "rank and file" of the Dems. But no, don't see any of those sites out here. I just think you can't resist coming here to Olbermannwatch to "preach" to the rest of us here at Owatch. And for someone who claims your ideas are uniquely your own, they sure do seem to parrot the hard core liberal looney line.

My ideas are my ideas...and are not derived from anyone else.

Posted by: Mike at March 25, 2007 10:20 PM
That's what these people can't grasp Mike. Thinking for yourself and coming to the conclusions you do based on a reasoning facilty and common sense. Those are two things that seem to be missing in some.

And for someone who claims your ideas are uniquely your own, they sure do seem to parrot the hard core liberal looney line.

Posted by: Brandon at March 25, 2007 10:53 PM

I love how people who have been so wrong about so many things call people looney when they themselves must be koo koo for coa coa puffs to support the things they do.

As far as websites are concerned, i do read Andrew Sullivan and The Moderate Voice and crooks and liars because yes, they are crooks and liars.

Brandon, the reason "you can't seem to find a "moderate" Democrat site" is not that much of a mystery to me. I firmly believe most American's viewpoints actually fall within the 'moderate' range, regardless of whether they call themselves "Democrats', 'Republicans', 'liberals', or 'conservatives'.

You and I do have one important thing in common. We are far more interested in what's going on politically than the average American is. I doubt seriously if the 'typical', more or less moderate Democrat is particularly interested in venting on a political blog. When I tell my personal friends that I do this, most of them just shake their heads.

I DON'T come here to 'preach' at anyone.... but I do come here to try to participate in some spirited arguments at times. I REALLY do want to better understand WHY people like you believe the way you do, when to me, it seems so contrary to what is best for our country. But often, all I get is somebody telling me what they THINK my motivations are.

If you are looking for an honest answer as to exactly what motivates me to come here, I can't give you one because sometimes I ask myself that very question. Sometimes it is fun, sometimes it is frustrating, and sometimes it is work. It does seem that you get a pretty good cross - section of viewpoints here if you read it long enough. Also the site is fairly well laid out and simple enought to use.

If my ideas seem to 'parrot' anything you see anywhere else, that's not really that much of a mystery either. It certainly doesn't surprise me that a large percentage of the population has become equally disallusioned with this particular Republican Administration and Congress for the same basic reasons I have. My views are not invented or derived viewpoints....they are a direct result of what these guys have or have not done, in my view, for or against my country. And my grade is a resounding F.

Why do I like Olbermann, who is far from perfect? Mostly because he articulates many views that I have myself. I don't see anyone else doing it quite the way he does, and I believe he has his needed place within today's changed media.

Since when is defending the enemy "best for our country?"

I love how people who have been so wrong about so many things call people looney when they themselves must be koo koo for coa coa puffs to support the things they do.

Posted by: codas at March 25, 2007 11:08 PM
Wanting to win the war is 'koo koo?' Ok, then.

Hey on the other posts the article about Keith's greatness is written bt a Muslim.
What a shock right!

Since when is defending the enemy "best for our country".

You don't have a clue what you are talking about when you charge me or any other American with "defending the enemy".

That is merely something manufactured within your confused mind. Saying things like that just constantly reaffirms your inability to think clearly to eveyone who can.

Posted by: codas at March 25, 2007 11:08 PM
Wanting to win the war is 'koo koo?' Ok, then.

Posted by: royalking at March 26, 2007 1:03 AM
Starting a war with a country who had never attacked us or had the ability to was koo ko. that's for sure. Be honest. "They" though of those film clips of Iraqi's surrendering to American soldiers and kissing their feet during the Gulf war and thought it would be the same. Shock and awe and the entire middle east would come to us on there knees. That was koo koo. If I thought a year from now, or 4 years from now we would be the conquering heroes we were supposed to be than I would be koo koo. I'm sorry the situation is what it is, but that's what happens when incompetant and delusional people run your country.

First Mike claims that his "ideas" are uniquely his own. Then he tries to claim that the reason they sound like 99.9% of the drivel I read at the Democratic websites is because "much of the country" thinks the same way. More Olbyloon logic at it's finest boys and girls!

You don't have a clue what you are talking about when you charge me or any other American with "defending the enemy".

That is merely something manufactured within your confused mind. Saying things like that just constantly reaffirms your inability to think clearly to eveyone who can.

Posted by: Mike at March 26, 2007 1:39 AM
I'm confused? I can't think clear? This, coming from someone who claims they don't read far left blogs while parroting everything from the front pages of them. My response to that lie would be, you don't need to read those idiotic blogs when you watch Ulbermahn twice every night. Every thing he bellows is taken right off of those very sites and read for you so you don't have to, what a guy. Speaking of which, it's MONDAY, didn't a certain person say Gonzales was going to be "gone by MONDAY?" That quote right there was ripped right off of the puffington post front page, oh, that's right, you don't read those far left blogs, you come up with your own ideas. Defending the enemy? You have been doing it as long as I have been reading this blog, should I go back and find a couple of doozies that you posted doing just that? You, burger king, codas, philby, pat, bob, and the ever so brave "anons" that spew their hatred are all defending the enmey. You're just to brainwashed to realize it. Oh, lets not forget the #1 defender of the enemy, Keith Ulbermahn, the king o' the loons!

I've been in Vegas a week. What happened to this site? The Topics are on the side panel.

RoyalKing:

1) - "I'm confused? I can't think clear?"..... NO, obviously you can't! You think and post exactly like a child would do. You are the ultimate in 'brainwashed'. Anything you disagree with, you label as either 'parroting' or "defending the enemy". It's SO much more convenient than actually defending your arguments with reason and logic.

2) - "Gonzales was going to be gone by MONDAY," ..... WHY are you parroting that back to me? I didn't say that. I made no predictions about when Gonzales would or would not be gone.

3) - "when you watch Ulbermahn twice evey night" ..... How long are you going to teep telling that LIE? I don't watch Olbermann "twice each night' and I NEVER said I did. Many nights, I don't even have the time to watch his show once, much less twice. You keep quoting a post I made in which I double checked something Johnny wrote by watching ONE particular show 'carefully' the second time. RoyalKing, I'll be glad to debate with you about anything, but if you keep lying about me, how do you think we can civilly 'debate' anything?

4) - I enjoy Olbermann because it sounds like he 'parrots' ME as much as anything else. I don't 'parrot' anybody! I ALSO take in a lot of CNN, AC Cooper, network news, Joe Scarborough, Hardball, Imus, Lou Dobbs, and even some Fox in limited doses. That in addition to a daily newspaper, and some political talk radio. My local right wing shock jock knows me well as a thorn in his side. I even have a good friend who hosts a conservative talk show at a small radio station. THIS blog is about Olbermann, and what he has discussed, and that is why you've seen me discussing Olbermann frequently on this site.

5) - While Olbermann IS guilty of not covering some issues he should, he can also be credited with covering some important stories that others, especially Fox, won't touch, simply because it is unfavorable to their lord and master administration.

6) - Your 'defending the enemy' arguments are just plain dumb ..... There's just no other word for talk like that. Anything you perceive as not supporting the destructive policies of this dumbass president are taken as "defending the enemy". You 'parrot' crap like that straight from media morons like Michael Savage. These are Arguments that are specifically designed to try to SHAME anyone who believes people like you are being anything BUT patriotic.....into just shutting up and going along. Sorry, but America is supposed to be ruled "by the people and for the people", NOT by roque presidents.

7) - "you're just too brainwashed" ..... No, I USED to be young and 'brainwashed' exactly like you are today...during and after the Vietnam conflict. When I was in the Air Force doing my best to further the cause, I also believed strongly in the cause. I THOUGHT all those people in America protesting the war were being 'unpatriotic', and even that they were 'defending the enemy'. Thing is, I was ignorant and WRONG. I became older and wiser and I thought our country had learned enough to avoid repeating that same kind of mistake again, but I was WRONG!. When I see your kind of arguments, it reminds me of me.... before I became older and wiser, although I don't think I ever publicly questioned people's patriotism the way you keep doing.

8) - Finally, you keep using that word 'brave' in association with other posters ..... Please tell us what you think is 'brave' about anything YOU do on this blog? I've seen armchair warriers like you on this blog many times, who would not dream of being a real warrier themselves, yet they have no problem accusing other posters of being 'cowards'! How hypocritical is it possible to become?

9)- Finally 'RoyalKing', if I was still in the military today, I would go wherever I was told to go, do whatever I was told to do, do it to the best of my ability, and keep my mouth shut....because that is what a soldier is supposed to do. However, I am no longer in the military, and therefore my job as a good citizen is to be a watchdog of my own government. The same thing Congress was SUPPOSED to have been doing the last six years.

Based on so many of your posts, I think you need a few civics lessons so you can begin to understand what has made America great, and how it is SUPPOSED to work.

Mike, you are so full of sh-t, it's not even funny. It's not just me that has pointed that out on several occasions. Wasn't it you that said you would feel sick, or something like that when you would walk into someone's house and they had Fox News on?(yes) Yet, you watch it at home? By the way, what's a "rouque" president?

RoyalKing:

I was testing you to see if you wanted real debate? but clearly you don't. All you want to do is taunt, DISTORT previous statements, try to throw them back in my face, and then say meaningless things like "you are so full of sh-t".

And if you think you were being picked on previously for simple misspellings or keyboard mistakes, you clearly STILL don't get it. That said, where did you take that 'rouque' president 'quote' from? .... because it clearly reads 'roque' president in my post above.

If you confuse spouting out inane crap like "your are so full of sh-t, it's not even funny" with actually making a coherent argument, then please just don't bother to respond to anything I say or addres me again, because you clearly are not up to the task of debating anything with me.

If you confuse spouting out inane crap like "your are so full of sh-t, it's not even funny" with actually making a coherent argument, then please just don't bother to respond to anything I say or addres me again, because you clearly are not up to the task of debating anything with me.

Posted by: Mike at March 26, 2007 1:33 PM

it's all they really have. You will not get anything but insulted or talked down to. They are as thick as the people they support and listen to. Limbaugh, Hannity, etc....

I thought maybe we needed to liven up this thread with a little humor courtesy of Mr. Mike Malloy

* George W. Bush:

Chuckle Nuts, the Giggling Killer, President Bunny Pants, Man-or-Monkey, Dim Son, Weak-and-Stupid, Raisin Brain(s), Too-Stupid-to-Be-President, Too-Stupid-to-Chew-a-Pretzel, Too-Stupid-to-Ride-a-Bicycle, Diphthong, MENSA Man, the Bush Bastard, the Toy President, Guaca-Moron, Cinco de Moron, Prince Valium,
Too-Stupid-To-Wear-His-Pants-Forward

* Dick Cheney:

Darth Cheney, Cyborg Man, Bionic Man, Deadeye Dick, The Shooter

* Laura Bush: Pickles

* Lynne Cheney: Lon Cheney, The Empress Of Evil, The Ghostess With The Mostess

* Condoleezza Rice: The Schoolmarm, Condoleezza Valdeez, The Shoe Lady

* Donald Rumsfeld: Rumsferatu, Rumskull, The Ghoul, The Zen God of War

* Alberto Gonzales: Bush's Tejano, Torquemada

* Tony Snow: Foxy the Snowman, Snow Job

* Rush Limbaugh: The pig man, The
Oxy-Moron

* Sean Hannity: The Baby Jesus, cockroach

* James Dobson: Devil Demon Dobson

Happy Monday to the NeoCon Death Cult!

Of course, Bill Clinton has never been "disbarred". You just kind of "wish" he had been.

You see, just "saying" something that you auto-eroticize over frenetically doesn't make it "so".

Do your homework, Junior.

Brandon: I just now saw your 8:56 'drivel' you posted back at me.

Why don't you try actually debating some ideas once and a while...instead of telling me where you THINK I got mine? I don't give a F**K what is said on Kos, or DU, or any of those other on-line sites, and neither should you. As I already told you, I don't read them...and all you can do is come back and imply that I'm a liar.

I think I know the answer you always resort to gutter tactics like that. You don't have any real ideas of your own, and you know damned well you couldn't begin to hold your own with me in any REAL debate about issues, so you resort to insults...and false psychoanalysis.

Calling Brandon, Jeff, Puck, or Rodan dumb is about as worthwhile enterprise as calling a lamp shade dumb.

You may feel better after having done so, but the lamp shade doesn't understand what you're saying...it just sits there continuing to block the light from everyone else.

Anon, so proud of your comments you can't even make up a name to use? Or are you someone who uses a name,but, when making childish jabs, choose to go anon? I think the latter is correct. That would be known as cowardly.

Anon, I REALLY believe you are not being very fair to Rodan and Puck when you put them down in the same class with those other two.

I thought you were going to say I wasn't being fair to lampshades...