Well, the Speshul Komment was a big, fat bore and thankfully, much briefer than his usual spitfests. Olby must be reading this board because he left Ashleigh's glasses at home tonight. Don't fret, Olby: You give us a lot of other reasons to make fun of you.

If you look at Friday's ratings, you can guess why we were burdened with a Speshul Komment. Nancy Grace owns you, Olby.

http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/03/26/fridays-numbers-43/#more-5326

Thanks to Keith Olbermann, I was watching Saturday Night Live ... and they were doing a joke about Sanjaya ... ... and they cut to the little girl ... and while I tried to laugh --- ALL THAT I COULD HAVE THOUGHT OF WAS "EFFING PLANT, SHE'S AN EFFING PLANT". It ruined my weekend. I want Saturday night of March 24 back. I want it back from Keith Olbermann.

He has that effect, doesn't he? This guy is such a hack that he is pushing recycled viral video, most of which he has already broadcast 10 times, as his #1 story. Keith Anally is the winner of the Everyday Idiot contest.

I think he only managed to eek out a second place finish one day last week. Of course it was time for another Special Komment!

great thanks tonight.

You call it hectoring, Johnny No-Credit. I call it "catching her in a dumb statement". WHICH SHE ADMITTED WAS A DUMB STATEMENT!!!

You, sir are a TOOL. And a DAMN STUPID TOOL TO BOOT!

Bueller? .........

Classic! Rack-em!

he is pushing recycled viral video, most of which he has already broadcast 10 times -

Those videos show up everywhere so viewers are saturated with them, and this idiot actually promotes the fact that he's filling time with them. Did they cut his staff, or did they all quit? Why can't he put on original material?

K Olberman got Giliani good & Im so glad I really cant stand K Olberman but theirs an old saying that says that the enemy of my enemy is my friend & thats true when K Olberman told us about Giliani getting workers to gather up the bones & body parts of people killed in 9/11 & use them to fill potholes I said this is it weve got him thank you so much cause its what I said all along Giliani has no morals or he wouldnt have been divorced that many times & sent his kids off & dressed in womens cloths & lived with homos & want homos to marry other homos & put guns up from us & encourage abortion cause we have to support life & morals & Giliani doesnt you know I am even v the death penalty I wish we had it but the church says no & wrote the old Pope & asked him to change that but he didnt answer me cause my brother says I didnt tell him I was Catholic but even so maybe the Popes right & so we have to stand up for life & be against abortion & Giliani wouldnt let the firemen look for other firemen as long as they needed to to save more of them cause he was in such a rush to tear the buildings down & mow over the, & now we know that the bones & body parts of dead people were ground up & put in pot wholes & its bas enough to think about that in theory but imagine your girl going to work & being killed & GIliani grinds her up & puts her in a hole in some dirty street some place how would you feel bad I bet cause life is precious. So you so lots of bad stuff about Pres Bush & that makes me really mad but tonight you did me a big big favor & I have to be a big man & say I hate your guts K Olberman but thanks for what you said tonight about GIliani & making the truth come out about this man whose got no moral altho some people here think hes God on high. So lets get rid of Giliani for 1 & for all & support J Bush or Sam Brownback or Thompson or even DeLay hes been on tv a lot later but just not a man without morals like Giliani good riddance to you RUDOLPH like the raindeer you ought to be called DASCHER & run off with some woman you meet in a bar cause I know you wouldnt mind having another divorce & thanks again this time K Olberman.

"...going to take the fifth rather than testify, Rev Olbermahn compared that to what criminals do"

Objective newsman Olbermoron... what. a. tool.

Looks like the Oompa Loompa may be the next A-Rod of cable broadcasters (defined loosely). A new 4yr $4 mil contract and the performance is lacking. The numbers in the money demo as well as total viewers have either plateaued or regressed. He is getting beat by the HLN version of Nancy "The cable guy" Grace on a consistent basis. The special comments are either "called in" like tonight or the rehashing of blue blogs. How much longer before the accolades from the left are replaces with a Bronx cheer from management?

Does anybody REALLY think that Nancy Grace takes viewers away from Keith Olbermann, or vice versa?

Second Place is wondering where you've been the last few weeks, Keith

Ya... some. They appeal to the same lowest-common-denominator loon demographic.

I went to Google, typed in the name "Keith Olbermann" and the phrase "moron", and I got 107,000 results.

LOL over half of them point to this site I bet ;-) (the others are most likely posted emails from ex-girlfriends).

'Ya... some. They appeal to the same lowest-common-denominator loon demographic."

No they don't! One focuses on politics, the other on crime sensationalism. There might be 10 coss-over viewers. I think Grace would pull more from O,Reilly than Olbermann, since he does way too much crime sensationalism himself.

You sound kind of like a loon to me. And with talk like that, you sure as hell have no claim to any high ground.

Mister Olbermahn will lift and read
From Kos to teleprompter to feed
The IQs run low
At the Meltdown show
The "newscast" with journalists in need

"You sound kind of like a loon to me. And with talk like that, you sure as hell have no claim to any high ground. "

Geezuz, dude. Chill out. As a public service, I'll try not to offer any opinions that'll set you off so strongly in the future (at least not until you've had a chance to go back and renew your meds prescription).

"I went to Google. typed in the name "Keith Olbermann", and the phrase "moron", and I got 107,000 results."

And I typed in "Bill O'Reilly" and "moron" and got 210,000 results. Whats your point?

If you type in "Bill O'Reilly" and "delusions of grandeur", you get 13,300 results.

Also, since when did the word "moron" become a "phrase"?

If you type in "Keith Olbermann" and "delusions of Grandeur", you only get 584 results.

If you type in "Keith Olbermann" "objective journalist" you get only 384 results (and most of those hits are from sites like this one ridiculing his being objective).

"Keith Olbermann" and "liberal" get about 745,000 results.

How many hits for "Keith Olbermann" and EGOTISTICAL a--hole?

Those videos show up everywhere so viewers are saturated with them, and this idiot actually promotes the fact that he's filling time with them. Did they cut his staff, or did they all quit? Why can't he put on original material?

Posted by bored at March 26, 2007 9:27 PM

It's called "low budget" and it shows every night, both times...........

Keith Olbermann and egotistical 9,890 hits

egotistical a--hole, 271 hits

keith olbermann a--hole 99,500 hits.

How many hits for "Keith Olbermann" and EGOTISTICAL a--hole?"

There were 12.

For comparative purposes, there were 77 hits under "Bill O'Reilly" and "EGOTISTICAL a--hole".

I got 367 hits for Olbermann and "egotistical a--hole". Just 12 huh? Let me add the lack of ability to read and use Google to the list of Olybloon traits.

I went to Google, typed in the name "Keith Olbermann" and the phrase "moron", and I got 107,000 results.

Posted by TBDave at March 26, 2007 10:02 PM

A certain olbyloon calls other posters "morons" when he has nothing else. When you have a 12-15 word vocabulary, the recycle rate is pretty high. This certain loon, also, claims to speak for conservatives, moderates and liberals! I wonder what it's like to live in his world...

Keith is a god amongst men,, is Bill O still trying to pass good looking young women at spring break off as news... oh wait that is the only part of his show that is interesting or entertaining

"Keith Olbermann and egotistical 9,890 hits"

ONLY if you leave out the quotes, which is fundamentally dishonest to do.

Now put "Keith Olbermann" and egotistical in quotes, and you only get 999.

Now put Bill O'Reilly and egotistical in quotes for comparative purposes, and you get a whopping 24,300.

Tricky tricky you!

Tricky? Olbermann wrote the book on Tricky.

Hmmm...

"Bill O'Reilly" "Liar" - 9,450 hits
"Keith Olbermann" "Liar" 148.000

And the biggest liar is...

Olbermann and his funny fans who use fuzzy facts?

"I got 367 hits for Olbermann and "egotistical a--hole". Just 12 huh. Le me add the lack of ability to read and use Google to the list of Olybloon traits."

But only when you leave the quotes off of "Keith Olbermann". If you don't do that, Mr. Loony, you get stange combinations of "keith", "Olbermann",and "egotistical" that have nothing to do with the subject at hand.

Now, if we do the comparison "your" (incorrect) way, we get 38,300 hits for O'Reilly and only 367 hits for Olbermann.

Wanna give us another lecture about how to use Google, shmart guy?

Keith's hypocracy was just off the charts tonight. First, he makes a "Special Comment" about someone comparing somebody else to Nazis. Keith has compared people to Nazis about a dozen times. Second, he defends Katie Couric on her asking John and Elizabeth Edwards if they were exploiting Elizabeth's cancer for political gain. Keith has named Rush Limbaugh "Worst Person in the World" twice for doing the same exact thing.

But the worst thing from tonight was Keith's besmirching of Pat Tillman. "He didn't believe in God". "He didn't believe in the war". "He didn't believe in the President". "He was a fan of Noam Chomsky".

Hmmmmmmm...

"Bill O'Reilly" "lapdog" - 95 hits
"Keith Olbermann" "lapdog" - 13,000

And the biggest lapdog is...

""Bill O'Reilly" "liar" - 9,480 hits
"Keith Olbermann" "liar" - 148,000 hits.

Ya might just wanna check those spellings again, because it's actually "Bill O'Reilly" "liar" - 303,000 hits & "Keith Olbermann" "liar" - 150,000 hits.

Any more lectures about "how to use Google"?

I wonder if Ulbermahn remembers how many people under BJ Clinton took the fifth? I am pretty sure it was one of the highest numbers of any president in history. I know for a fact BJ and Hillary have the record for saying 'I don't know" and "I don't recall" during testimony.

Actually it's Bill O'Reilly" "lapdog" - 29,400 hits. "Keith Olbermann" "lapdog" - 25,500 hits.

No dice again, shmart guy, but you are getting closer.

CLINTON DID IT TOO!!!!!!

Oh, look, the Olbyapologists are out in force again tonight. It must be exhausting having to apologize for him 24/7. Do you people ever sleep? Go to work? Have a life outside of Olbermann? Sad, so sad.

Mr. Brandon, now go back to your 10:52 and explain to us again about how "Olbyloons don't know how to use Google"

What would it take to ever get one of you Anti-Olbermann Loons to ever admit that you are wrong?

CLINTON DID IT TOO!!!!!!

Hey everybody, do ya know that everything that Bush has done, well - CLINTON DID IT TOO!!!!

Perhaps you should go lecture your buddy Olbermann. Seems if you actually LOOK at the returned results for "DeLay" and "Delusions of grandeur" that just on the first page alone, you find that many are not specifically discussing Delay. But in Olbyloonland, Olbermann is never wrong is he? Face it, your boy stretches the truth, flat-out lies, and often omits. but you'll never ADMIT THAT now will you?

I know why you guys hate Keith Olbermann so much. It's not his politics at all!!

All of the faults you see in him, you all have in spades yourselves, and we all know that likes repell.

I typed in olbermann and toupee and got 970 hits.

Looky, looky. Mr Brandon wants to change the subject now that he's been proven wrong (again).

Mr. Brandon now wants to lecture us about how all Google returns are not really relevant to the target search.

Guess what shmart guy, we already know that. However, It's good that you managed to learn something tonight.

Such is the confused, murky little world of the anti-Olbermann loon.

"All of the faults you see in him, you all have in spades yourselves, and we all know that likes repell."

Hmmm... Regarding Olbermoron's obsession with OReilly, naming him a Worst Person so often... good to know "likes repell".

"I typed in Olbermann and toupee and got 970 hits."

Why that just WONDERFULL, Mugsy. I'm so glad you're progressing in your Google class. Are you taking lessons from the Video Professor?

You might want to try a three syllable word next.

Why that just WONDERFULL, Mugsy.

Posted by: Just Answering at March 26, 2007 11:39 PM

Why don't you try working on your grammar?

The most basic type of sentence is the simple sentence, which contains only one clause. A simple sentence can be as short as one word:

Usually, however, the sentence has a subject as well as a predicate and both the subject and the predicate may have modifiers.

Check this out... guide to the mind of an Olbyloon.

===

From "The Podium" -- The weblog of the Opinion page of the Michigan Daily

By Imran Syed, written on Mar. 18, 2007

I’ve been meaning to put this up for a few days now, but it’s still relevant. After all, great newscasters can’t really go out of style.

Here is proof that I am not the only one in the world who loves Keith Olbermann and has declared him as one of the great cable news anchors. Taking on the O’Reilly head to head isn’t a job anyone wants but Olbermann has handled it with impressive results. Head-to-head O’Reilly slaughters Olbermann in ratings (more than 3-1) but let’s not forget that Billo has a seven-year headstart and is seen as the ultimate in conservative TV anchors. Olbermann’s base is divided because there are some many level-headed newscasters out there to choose from.

Nevertheless Olbermann’s ratings are impressive for an upstart taking on Fox News’s top guy. And they’re rising because the word is out: Keith Olbermann is more than funny an hip; he’s passionate and cuts through the crap like no one else on TV. I don’t say this simply because he’s liberal, I happen to hate most newscasters (conservative or liberal) — don’t get me started on Air America.

Olbermann rocks because he is smarter than just about any other news guy on TV; he writes the editorial content of the show himself and packs quite a punch when it comes to articulating this entire country’s frustration with Bush’s war and lies. Check him out on MSNBC weekdays at 8pm and midnight or on the website, it’s definitely worth it.

link to my previous post...

http://apps.michigandaily.com/blogs/thepodium/?p=166

That's GREAT Mugsy! Did you find that while practicing your Google lessons?

That's GREAT Mugsy! Did you find that while practicing your Google lessons?

Posted by: Just Answering at March 26, 2007 11:51 PM

No, it's tattooed on the top of your mamma's head and I read it while she was earning a quick $2!

Mugsy! How in the world did you get past the front desk at the rest home?

Since Chris Wallace called Olbermoron a lounge act--you guys need to get a new graphic of keithy's head w/ like John Travolta -Sat. Nite Fever body or better yet Andy Kauffman's alter ego--With a Holiday Inn sign, or better yet a Sheraton or Ramada Inn sign in the background -saying Please Come See Monkeymann -No One Else Is. One week only.

Mugsy! How in the world did you get past the front desk at the rest home?

Posted by: Just Answering at March 27, 2007 12:07 AM

See previous post. Your mamma works on the cheap.

Gosh Mugsy, you must be really hard up, huh?

Gosh Mugsy, you must be really hard up, huh?

Posted by: Just Answering at March 27, 2007 12:18 AM

Not really. Next week I am going to splurge and spend $3 on her. That gets you false teeth out.

It's funny how a person, after loosing an all day long debate, re-appears under a different name. Who will he be tomorrow? These new names appear, then, poof they're gone. Entertaining, to say the least.

JohnE,
It's a muslim praising Ulbermahn.
What a shocker!
Not!

http://www.suntimes.com/news/novak/312734,CST-EDT-novak26.article

Robert Novak, that liberal hack who never acts on behalf of the Republicans must be totally out of his mind. He wrote in his column today that the republican party has turned their back on Bush up on the hill.

This Novak guy is just one more example of the left-wing media telling lies about our great president. Doesn't Novak sound a lot like Keith Olbermann with all this talk about Bush being so arrogant?

But we all know who has been saying what Novak is just starting to say about Bush - Olbermann. Novak thinks he can be as repected as Olbermann now!

How humiliating is it that Robert (the douche bag) Novak is trying rub elbows with keith Olbermann?

Next thing you know Chuck Hagel and a whole host of a growing number Republican congressmen will be calling Bush out in the same way Olbermann has for the last 2 years.

Keith, you our leader!!!

It is obvious now that Olbermanns obsession with Bill O'Reilly has become scary. Olbermann attacks O'Reilly nightly while O'Reilly's rating rise and Olbermann's drop like a stone. Olbermann is obviously jealous of the fact that O'Reilly was a real journalist on the #1 syndicated news show on TV while Olbermann was a failed sports caster. Olbermann’s book was a complete failure while O'Reilly's was a total success. Olbermann can't get out of the shadow of Dan Patrick. Olbermann has to share a failed radio show with Patrick while O'Reilly's radio show rivals Rush Limbaugh in audience. Olbermann had failed program after failed program and has only gained success by appealing to the loon fringe of the DNC. O'Reilly is the crown jewel of the number one cable news network. O'Reilly takes on anyone in a debate while Olbermann spouts his opinion to yes men and boot lickers. Olbermann must date immature women to so that he has the power in the relationship. Olbermann hides under his desk and his so frightened of others that they must use a mail box to communicate with Olbermann. I am guessing Olbermann had a very poor relation ship with his mother and father. His father was probably a week sniffling little wimp who was pushed around by Keith’s mother. Keith’s mother was probably a stern dominating woman who beat Keith repeatedly.

It's funny how a person, after loosing an all day long debate, re-appears under a different name. Who will he be tomorrow? These new names appear, then, poof they're gone. Entertaining, to say the least.

Posted by: royalking at March 27, 2007 12:27 AM
JohnE,
It's a muslim praising Ulbermahn.
What a shocker!
Not!

Posted by: Rodan at March 27, 2007 12:29 AM

-----------------------------------------------------------

Note these two names post at the same time all the time. When have no brains to debate with you make it look like you are twice as smart by posting under multiple names

Jeff ,
You aren't the real Jeff. when did I lose a debate? I haven't posted in a couple of days. You must be a Kult of Keith member?
Do you guys do suicide bombing on behalf of yout Almighty Prophet? The dork Ulbermahn?

I am guessing Olbermann had a very poor relation ship with his mother and father. His father was probably a week sniffling little wimp who was pushed around by Keith’s mother. Keith’s mother was probably a stern dominating woman who beat Keith repeatedly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yea well at least Keith's parents sent him to school, unlike yours.

"relation ship" One word ace!
"week" is seven days.

------------------------------------------------

Looks like spell check couldn't help you here.

As for your telling descriptive of Mr Olbermann, I would have to say it shows a great insight to such family living. Who portends so well about themselves but in how they project themselves onto others.

Your focus on the act of humiliating by way slight on the parents of man you dislike says more about you than your subject.

I love how Kieth can leave pin heads like so bent out of shape.

Fact is this is all you got. As Bush goes down in flames so does the reputation of the hillbilly news source - Fix News.

O'lielly has the majority? The majority of uneducated hillbillies who need someone else to patronize them and tell them how to think.

You are a joke!

Royalhick,
How come Ulbermahn doesn't do real reporting? He's a hack not a real journalist!
Chris Wallce tore him to shreds.

RoyalKIng drivel again: "It's funny how after losing an all day long debate, reappears under a different name."

And who would that be moron? I just looked back over the whole day, and I didn't find ANY 'debates' at all, much less an "all day' one. I certainly challenged you to a debate. I made some valid points and waited patiently for your counterpoints...but your idea of 'debate' was to just come back and call me "full of sh-t". Now I see you've gone back to your wierd little obsession with the identity of other posters, as if that matters.

It's no mystery why they come and leave, you moron. It's because they come here and find YOU lurking here 24/7. It's kind of like dropping in on a grade school level chat room. You single handily keep the level of discourse on this blog at less than a high school education level....and then you wonder why nobody wants to come here anymore.

The 'lamp shade' comment fits you perfectly...and no, I didn't make that post, you MORON.

Royalhick,
How come Ulbermahn doesn't do real reporting? He's a hack not a real journalist!
Chris Wallce tore him to shreds.

Posted by: at March 27, 2007 12:54 AM

So let's see Chris Wallace is your hero, Bill O'leilly is your hero, Sean Hannity, Mike Savage, Rush Limbaugh... all your heroes.

Me? My father was my hero. What happened to your father?

Mike,
It's not Jeff. That was Coward Watch. That loser Clown I embarrassed and exposed as a Leftwing fraud!

Royalhick/Cowardwatch.
None of the above are my heroes. Unlik you who wordhips your prophet Ulbermahn. I don't idolize any media figure.
I just stated the truth.
Chris Wallace ripped Ulbermahn a new one!

"Since Chris Wallace called Olbermoron a lounge act..."

That's funny Chris should say that. Have you seen the new Hannity and Colmes set? I feel like I should be ordering a drink from them.

...And Hannity can probably make it since he used to be a bartender.

"Hey bartender how 'bout another round of bullsh-t for eveyone on the house..."

...And did you see tonight how Dick Morris would just not Shut the f--- Up? That made for great television!

Oh wait, this is Olbermann Watch, oh sorry, Well, Olbermann does go up against H&C on the left coast for round 2.

On Topic!

Rodan, the person I was talking to was RoyalKing - AKA Jeff. He posted at 12:27.

He accused somebody of losing "an all day debate". It sure as hell wasn't me because I couldn't get either him or Brandon to actually 'debate' anything.

Rodan, I don't agree with you on a lot of things, but you are one hell of a lot smarter and more civil than Jeff (RoyalKing) is. I'm not sure why you would want to lower yourself to his level.

Mike on Social issues we would agree. Hech probably even economic issues since Bush has done nothing to protect the Professional class from Outsourcing.
Citigroup is laying of 15,000 workers and moving the positions to India.
Where we disagree is foreign policy.
Hey Mike chat with you tommorow.
Take care.

>If you look at Friday's ratings, you can guess why we were burdened with a Speshul Komment. Nancy Grace owns you, Olby.

Dude, you are so Obsessed with a TV personality you follow his ratings online. Sure, I post on a message board about him, but so do you. That's the common denominator, we all post here (I'm guessing because of the 'yo mamma' jokes that appear earlier in the thread). It's what people do above and beyond that, that gets kind of scary. Following his ratings each week...a little weird.

I think you might need to just back away slowly before you get hurt...

The Righteous Brothers ,
Ulbermahn is a Leftist hack!

>The Righteous Brothers ,
Ulbermahn is a Leftist hack!
Posted by: Rodan at March 27, 2007 1:19 AM

So, I guess his low ratings means America is safe from converting to communism for a little while longer.

I'll sleep better tonight...

> you are so Obsessed with a TV personality you follow his ratings online

Um, Olby's latest ratings are given in our summary every night. There is nothing "above and beyond" required to just read the article. Perhaps you should try it sometime.

Um, Olby's latest ratings are given in our summary every night. There is nothing "above and beyond" required to just read the article. Perhaps you should try it sometime.

Posted by: johnny dollar at March 27, 2007 1:46 AM

Johnny you do the web page thing like a mother does clean diapers.

Do you think the day will come when you realize that it is not how many people who watch a particular program but the caliber of the people watching? So you want to find solice in your hero and anti hero mentality? Fine, but consider who these people are hero and anti hero to.

O'lielly vs Olbermann is equivalent to hillbilly cowards vs educated people who stand against a majority if it means defending the Constitution that is your country.

This nation might as well be Mexico or Russia without our Constitution being protected and followed to the letter.

So your numbers game means jack squat when you consider it is a large number of pin heads who seek the pseudo-patriotism that Fox News spoon feeds brain dead idiots - sorry to say - JUST LIKE YOU!

Keith Olbermann is a face on a screen - what he says are words with meaning. What that meaning is has nothing to do with the sophomoric formulas you dream up to attack him.

Fox News is the antichrist and you are the devils spawn!

All cowards are!

> Do you think the day will come when you realize that it is not how many people who watch

And where did I say it WAS how many people who watch? Hmmm? Got an answer for that, Coward Boy?

The reason we started following the nightly ratings was simple. Keith brought it up. He started crowing that he beat O'Reilly in a demo for 15 minutes, and other statistical tricks. So each night we present the truth. It called keeping Keith honest: sort of like squaring a circle but we do try.

coward watch actually thinks he/she/it is smart. HA! Coward, the word 'too' has two 'o's. LOL. Idiot.

Dick Durbin's remarks were correct.

When was the last time the US rounded up people just because of their nationality and tossed then into an encampment? WWII. I challenge everyone who reads this to find a Japanese person who was IMPRISONED in one of those camps without any reason or any charge against them.

Sounds like a certain base in Cuba to me - people imprisoned with no charges, no legal council, and no rights. Anyone who defends that as the American way needs to reread their Declaration of Independence and Constitution.

Johnny the ratings are all you got. You and yours are not able to evaluate the value or accuracy of a person's comments on tv by any other means than by ratings, it is all you and yours ever talk about.

That fact you deny this speaks volumes of about the rectal cranial inversion you suffer from.

The real conservatives of this nation hate Fox News and they sure as hell hate people like you who play hero worship to scum like Hannity and Limbaugh and O'lielly.

This is bush league stuff and you and Cox are living in a pretend world of significance.

I read on Watching Olbermann Watch where Cox outed a woman's personal profile and identity (yes her identity). Because she humiliated him. I call this pussy misogynistic low life cowardice.

If you are half the ogre Cox is then you two are truly a dynamic duo of coward losers.

This page will never make you a man. I don't care if O'rielly himself shakes your hand and pats you on the back. You still are nothing more than a suck up. You are not the man being idolised - you are the idolizer.

It ain't gonna rub off on you. This page is a place for trading barbs and nothing more. Olbermann probably loves to see chumps like you and Cox championing Fox and O'lielly. It really makes them look bad by contrast that people like you guys find yourself defending them.

Great work!

Gotta go - time for Stephen Colbert

great thanks ( i just quickly looked down and to my right)

Two points "Just Answering". I was pointing out, as were most of us I think, but you were too dense to get it, that you can key in almost any string into google and get multiple hits off of it. It was Olbermann who began this discussion and we were just illustrating how utterly ridiculous it was but thanks for proving my point about how dense he is and how utterly moronic his hardcore fan base is.

Secondly, to "Royalhick" who decided to chide a viewer on grammar and spelling. You might want to take your own advice. Olbermann's first name is spelled K-E-I-T-H, not Kieth.

And finally to dear Coward Watch. Olbermann himself has crowed about his ratings and his "success" in the key demo. If he drops discussions of his ratings, and stops making false claims to reporters which later have to be retracted (USA TODAY for example) then I'm sure that we'll gladly drop discussion of his ratings.

philby/enemy defender, are you putting Jack Daniels in your coffee? Try using just a half of a shot tomorrow.

Sounds like a certain base in Cuba to me - people imprisoned with no charges, no legal council, and no rights. Anyone who defends that as the American way needs to reread their Declaration of Independence and Constitution.

Posted by: Sanity Check at March 27, 2007 2:23 AM
If you had any clue whatsoever, which you don't, you would know that the terrorist detainees that are being held were not just "rounded up" like you so ignorantly stated. They were captured in "combat" situations, i.e. guns in hand, bombs, bomb making material, etc. Too bad we don't do a "round up" here in the U.S.

Johnny, Bob, Brandon, why can't this site be a "register site?" I see last night the infamous coward watch was name jacking again. Why is it he never steals an olbyloon's name? Typekey would be better than nothing, as long as people can't sidestep it.

It's funny how a person, after loosing an all day long debate, re-appears under a different name. Who will he be tomorrow? These new names appear, then, poof they're gone. Entertaining, to say the least.

Posted by: royalking at March 27, 2007 12:27 AM
lil mikey, did I mention your name at all? You seem awful defensive, usually a good sign of guilt. Just an observation I made yesterday and in the past.

RoyalKing/AKA Jeff:

Why would you cut and paste your own inane quote in order to make a post addressed to me? I have nothing to be 'defensive' about, but it is as obvious as hell whenever you are referring to me. You are not smart enough to disquise anything.

As for the identity of other posters, and whether or not they are 'hiding' with other names or as anon's....YOU ARE THE ONLY ONE HERE WHO GIVES A F**K!

It doesn't matter who posts as what. What matters is what is said in the post.

As for people coming and 'disappearing', that is not a mystery at all. They come here, find YOU lurking here at all hours...conclude that there is no intelligent life here...and they leave. What's the mystery?

I and others have called you a 'moron', and other such things. You are so dumb that you don't realize this is not name calling at all in your case....you REALLY ARE a moron!

Jeff/RoyalKing/moron logig: "It's funny how a person, after losing an all day long debate"

The point I already made about this was that there WAS no "day long debate" yesterday, you moron. There was no 'debate' at all! I did TRY to engage you in a 'debate'. You don't debate....all you do is come back with insults....the sign of a moron!

RoyalKing - AKA Jeff to another poster:

"You are an IMBOCILE"

Probably the most stupid comeback ever recorded on this blog.

And he STILL thinks it was just about 'spelling'

who lurks here 24/7? lil mikey does.

Coward Watch:

yawn.

lil mikey, you sure are wasting a lot of time on something that "doesn't matter". lmao, again.

"who lurks here 24/7? lil mikey does."

While something of an exageration, this is the ONLY thing you've ever posted that makes any sense.

I probably do need my head examined for coming here as much as I do.

I probably do need my head examined for coming here as much as I do.

Posted by: Mike at March 27, 2007 12:04 PM
See, we finally agree on something! Do you agree this should be a "register site", also?

"It was Herr Olbermann who compared Fox News to Nazis. "

While we are on the "you're one too" logical fallcies, did anyone catch the Fox news headline "Democrats are legislating defeat in Iraq" How is that for fair and balanced?

While we are on the "you're one too" logical fallcies, did anyone catch the Fox news headline "Democrats are legislating defeat in Iraq" How is that for fair and balanced?

Posted by: craigs at March 27, 2007 12:13 PM
What does Fox News have to do with the democrats legislating defeat? I would call that "calling it as they see it".

"do you agree this should be a 'register site' also?"

Now we 'agree' on two things, but I'm not sure it's possible at this time. I think they have already tried.

"What does Fox News have to do with the democrats legislating defeat? I would call that "calling it as they see it"."

Only that it's NOT real journalism....and it is EXACTLY the kind of false 'journalism' that Olbermann does....the kind that the operators of this site stay so incensed about.

>They were captured in "combat" situations, i.e. guns in hand, bombs, bomb making material, etc. Too bad we don't do a "round up" here in the U.S.
Posted by: royalking at March 27, 2007 11:05 AM

That simply isn't true...

And a Native American calling for a 'round up' here in the US, that's rich!

My five year old thought the photo of Britney Spears with her teeth blacked out was really funny.What a childish moron this Olberfool is,he ought to be ashamed of himself.

My five year old thought the photo of Britney Spears with her teeth blacked out was really funny.What a childish moron this Olberfool is,he ought to be ashamed of himself.

>They were captured in "combat" situations, i.e. guns in hand, bombs, bomb making material, etc. Too bad we don't do a "round up" here in the U.S.
Posted by: royalking at March 27, 2007 11:05 AM

That simply isn't true...

And a Native American calling for a 'round up' here in the US, that's rich!

Posted by: The Righteous Brothers at March 27, 2007 12:35 PM
You, my friend, are sadly mistaken. Can you come up with one shred of proof that there was one terrorist or any person in Iraq that was just "rounded up" and detained indefinately as you so ignorantly stated? What's wrong with a Native American suggesting the round up and imprisonment of traitors? It's against the law, in case you didn't know that, either.

Just got back from the puffington post to see if they had any article regarding Tony Snow and his cancer. There is a one line "article" and no commenting is allowed. Could it be that puffington knows they would be celebrating? May God be with Mr. Snow.

Mrs Philby,
If the Republicans are going to be minority party for decades to come, why is Ruday leading Hillary 5-7 % points in the polls?

Hey Lefties
Read below:
Fifty percent of Adults would not vote for Clinton
By Kelly McCormack
March 27, 2007
Half of voting-age Americans say they would not vote for Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) if she became the Democratic nominee for president in 2008, according to a Harris Interactive poll released Tuesday.
More than one in five Democrats that participated in the survey said they would not vote for Clinton. Overall, 36 percent say they would vote for the former first lady and 11 percent are unsure of their top choice.

Forty-eight percent of Independent voters also said that they would choose another candidate over Clinton, the poll, which surveyed 2,223 potential voters, states.

Fifty-six percent of men said that they would not vote for Clinton, while 45 percent of women said that she would not be their pick. In addition, 69 percent of those 62 and older said that they would not vote for Clinton.

Nearly half of the respondents said that they dislike Clinton’s political opinions and Clinton as a person. Fifty-two percent of people also said that “she does not appear to connect with people on a personal level.”

> did anyone catch the Fox news headline "Democrats are legislating defeat in Iraq" How is that for fair and balanced?

1. It was not a Fox News headline.

B. It was part of an opinion commentary by a clearly identified commentator.

You see, I actually DID catch it. I didn't just look at a blue blog who put up the screengrab without telling anyone that it was from Hannity's weekly commentary he does at the top of his Sunday night show. The blue blog wanted you to believe that this was a "Fox News headline" rather than a part of an opinion commentary. Olbyloons, by definition gullible, swallowed it whole.

R. Adrian Philby,
You said the GOP will be a monority party for decades, yet why is Rudy leading Hitlery in the polls by 5-7%?
How come 50% of americans will not vote for the Hillary who's the leader for the Dems?

philby, it was the libs that wished V.P. Cheney was assassinated? Have you forgotten?

>philby, it was the libs that wished V.P. Cheney was assassinated? Have you forgotten?
Posted by: royalking at March 27, 2007 2:12 PM

First, Bill Maher (an Independent) says that if Cheney died, less people would die in the world.

Then, Bush Apologists accuse Maher of 'Wishing Cheney was Assassinated."

Then, royalking accuses 'libs' of wishing Cheney was assassinated.

And that, my friends, is why you can't just take Jeff's word for anything.

>May God be with Mr. Snow.

May Snow be with God.

RoyalKing (AKA Jeff):

"detained indefinately as you so IGNORANTLY stated"

You claim you don't insult the other side, but you do it all the time! WHY did you feel you had to put 'ignorantly' in your response to thst post? That particular poster didn't insult YOU...he just gave his honest opinion.

ALso RoyalKing (AKA Jeff) said in the same post: "What's wrong with a Native American suggesting the round up and imprisonment of traitors"

Because 'Jeff', this would no longer be America if that happened. We would become just like our enemies.....and advocating something like that my friend, makes you "a defender of the enemy", who WANT us to become just like them.

It is only your OPINION that Americans who have different opinions than you are 'traitors'. I happen to believe YOU are a traitor because you advocate so many things that are decidedly un-American.....but I'm not suggesting rounding up and imprisoning traitors like you, because THAT would be un-American....and it would make me no better than you if I suggested such a thing.

"And that my friends is why you can't take Jeff's word for anything."

EXACTLY....because people like 'Jeff' intentionally distort and misquote everything that don't please them. 'Jeff' cares nothing for the 'truth', he only cares about 'winning' and trying to shout down the opposition.

Mrs. R. Adrian Philby,

Ruday reduced Crime in NY, reduces Welfare, reduced taxes and put the Leftist media in it's place. He didn't stab the Fireman in the back as he attended the funerals of many of the fallen. He's popular with the rank and file. I know, one of my buddies in NY is a Fireman and he told me most of the Firemen are backing Rudy.

He will the niomination as he's the only Republican that can beat Hillary or Obama.
The Religious Right is giving Rudy a pass Because unlike Bush he'll take the Left head on and since he neutralizes the Left on social issues he'll expose them for the fakes they are. He'll also neuter the press and put fear into the heartd of Toystore desk jockeys like ulbermahn.
That is why you guys keep hoping Rudy isn't the Rep you will face.

As for Hitlery, she has the Dem nomination locked. She has the Leftist Media and the party establishment.
Rudy vs. Hillary, I prdeict Rudy will win 54% of the vote and win at least 40 states!

RoyalKing (AKA Jeff) again: "could it be that puffington knows they would be celebrating".

On the contrary 'Jeff'....we're not like you!

Mr. Snow is a decent man who, in my opinion, happens to be a little misguided politically.

That said, I haven't read anything from you, in any of your posts, that suggest that YOU are a decent man.

May God be with Tony Snow, and may God be with Mrs. Edwards, regardless of their politics.

Mike,
Did you see the hitpiece Katie Couric did on Edwards. I thought it was disgusting!

Johnny Dollar's post at 1:40 is proof that his purpose here is not only to malign Keith Olbermann, but also to defend Fox 'News'.

Oooh, that's clever, Mike who was leaving but won't go away. Does the truth really hurt you that much, or do you prefer to believe lies? Perhaps so, since you defend Olbermahn. And instead of addressing facts, you attack the MOTIVATIONS of those who dare speak something you don't want to hear. Hey "Mike", don't go away mad. Just go away.

Rodan:
'
I didn't see the actual broadcast, but I've seen clips from it, and I've heard the controversy...and it certainly sounds like she crossed way over the line of common decency.

Johnny: ""Mike", don't go away mad, just go away."

How cute. Johnny wants me to "go away".

I attack your "MOTIVATIONS" for good reason. If you were after 'truth', wherever you might find it...or, if you were after 'lies', wherever they might be, THAT would actually be honorable, but you only look for truth and lies selectively.

As for me saying I was going away...touche! But who are you to talk? You said this whole site was going away, and then you returned.

You want me to "go away"? Simple solution...block me.

She's a hypocrite. When her husband was dying of cancer, she didn't quit her job. I liked what Edwards said.
Being a Lawyer was a job, the Presidency is a service."
The reason Katie went after Edwards is because she's a Hitlery shrill. With Kaplan, the Clinton's buddy at CBS news now watch more hit piece against anyone in Hillary's way!

New rule, "traders do not get to question my patriotism"

I can't believe how he makes fun of Olbermann on this clip!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o47_zfuRfq4

> You said this whole site was going away, and then you returned.

I did? is this going to be another thing like Coward Boy where you claim I said something and then refuse to point out where I said it? Hmmm? Why don't you point out where I said this whole site was going away? Or did you pull an Olbermahn and just make that up?

> You want me to "go away"? Simple solution...block me.

Hah! Why would I do that? To see someone flailing around, so afraid to respond to facts that he resorts to attacking people's motivations, why that's my daily entertainment. Yeah, it's kind of like shooting fish in a barrel, but even cheap comedy can still be funny.

lil mikey, are you denying that there were hundreds of posts on puffington, alone, that said "why couldn't the bomb have hit Cheney?" They have all been flagged and deleted by now, I'm sure. You say,"we're not like you". How blind (or in denial) can you be? You sound just like philby when she said "she had never met a teacher who tried to indoctrinate students."

Johnny: Evading once again "Why don't you point out where I said this whole site was going away?"

You're so slick it's sickening. I guess maybe it was Robert Cox who actually said that. YOU didn't actually say it, did you? I guess I just made it up that the site actually DID go away, complete with an anouncement that it was going away, with the pretentions of it being permanent...it's not anything like that is it? It's not like you arn't the main face of this site, is it?

In this case motivations are EVERYTHING, whether you like it or not....or have you never heard of the phrase "conflict of interest", a principal you violate in spades daily?

Mrs Philby,
This isn't a grammar exam ok. I'm very literate and read plenty of books when I can.

"You don't seem to give a high priority to Constitutional rights or American principles"

I care about the survival of our civilization.
Europe is dyding and in 25 years will be under the control of Islamic militants.
The Leftists media is assistaing the Muslims attampt to establish Sharia law in the nation.
Until this threat passes the Press must be neutered! They are helping spread Islamic propaganda in this nation.

"maybe find a Burqua Babe to boot."
That's what I want to prevent, but through the Pro-Islamic attitude of the Left, that;'s what will be the result!

lil mikey, show me where I "misquoted" or "distorted" anything and I will call you mike from now on. The Ann Coulter one doesn't count, that was my memory lapsing, once. Since you said I "misquoted" and "distorted" everything, it should be easy.

RoyalPain: "lil Mikey, are you denying that there were hundreds of posts on Huffington Post"...

I'm not denying anything. I don't read the Huffington Post....ever! I did hear from news reports that there were some offensive posts put on there to that effect....and to Huffington's credit, they removed them.

There have been plenty of equally offensive post on here, from you side.

Mike and Royalking,
Can you guys call a cease fire. For about several weekes you two have been going back and forth. It's going no where. It's like saying, which came 1st, the Chicken or the Egg. Can both of you just call for a truce and back off a bit.

> YOU didn't actually say it, did you?

Aha, an admission by "mike" that he got it wrong. A good first step but you have eleven more to go.

> "conflict of interest", a principal you violate in spades daily?

Prove it.

Don't you people have anything better to do than google words and tell everyone about how many hits you got. GET A LIFE YOU STUPID FREAKS.

RoyalPain: "show me where I "misquoted" or "distorted" anything".

Why would I try to'show you anything, because you deny facts when the're placed right under your nose. I 'showed' you PROOF where you lied about ME several times, and you just ignored that. You even helped me to prove you lied about me one time, so why would I go to the time and trouble of finding your many other distortions of facts and outright lies.

Finally, I don't give a F**K what you call me. Your calling me "Lil Mickey" just makes you look stupid, it's not a problem for me.

Rodan, all due respect, I am not backing off. lil mikey thinks he can twist sh-t around, put words in my mouth, call me a liar over and over, and never back anything up. I'm still waiting for my misquotes and distortions.

I'll take that as an " I can't." Johnny is waiting for proof, you better come up with something for him, I have to get back to work.

Rodan: I've TRIED to "back off' with this guy. I've tried ignoring him...and he insults me anyway. I've tried staying off the site for days at a time...and then he starts accusing other posters of being 'me'.

If I go away for a period of time, he steps up his lies and taunts in an obvious attempt to draw me out again. For Jeff, nothing is about 'truth' because he really believes I am the 'enemy'.

Oh well Royalking and Mike I tried since I get along with both of you!

See what I mean Rodan: I have PROVED he lied about me several times, it's right here in the archives, and he keeps IGNORING that proof. Yet he's trying to make me waste time going back to find still MORE proof about something else he denies he has done, even though we all know he's guilty as hell.

Johnny:

No I didn't get it 'wrong' at all. The site closed, announced it was closing, implied the closing was permanent...and YOU are the face of this smear site. It was all either a big lie, or you people are just wishy washy...neither one is good.

Thats ALL you do....wiggle around with technicalities, and that is why you have no credibilty whatsoever.

I'll hand you one thing though, you're slick!

> No I didn't get it 'wrong' at all.

Time to do a reality check on Mike:

> You said this whole site was going away, and then you returned.

Me: Why don't you point out where I said this whole site was going away?

> I guess maybe it was Robert Cox who actually said that.

And the topper:

> No I didn't get it 'wrong' at all.

Hahaha.

Johnny:

One definition of "conflict of interest" would be operating a Fox (Faux) 'News' lovefest blog, and then taking compensation to administer a smear site of a Fox rival...who just happens to have Polar opposite politics, along with a commentator who hates him.

Your nightly 'recaps' are a joke. They have little or no resemblance to the actual show...and your constant reference's to things like "fat Ass", the "infamous deplorable Keith Olbermann" and similar tripe takes away any any and all credibilty you might have otherwise had. You claim things like "fat Ass" are just repeating things he has said himself, but you are ignoring the FACT that he doesn't use these derogatory terms constantly, as YOU DO! Your recaps look more like a comic book page than anything else, and are quite frankly, not even worth reading.

You even refused to cut him a little slack when he named himself a WPITW for his use of "fat ass", and for acknowledging his own hypocrisy.

There is no question that YOU are far worse than the object oy your scorn...the ultimate hypocrite!

So Olbermann made himself WPITW on that one night. Did you know that a reporter from New York magazine was tailing him at the time for a future profile article? How much do you want to bet the reporter called him on this and he knew he had to suck up and "endear"himself to guarantee yet another suck-ass media lovefest for himself?

how many times has Olbermann used deragatory terms to describe others? How many times has he apologized for that? More times than I can count. That is not defendable in any way, shape, or form, yet, the Olbyapologists here certainly do try just like Mike is above.

Mrs Philby,
"Your ignorance is whole, complete and absolute. I am in Europe a dozen or so times a year, sometimes spending as much time in Europe as I do in the US. Europe is not becoming an Islamic liege. Even in the more heavily Islamic-settled places, such as suburban London, Paris, Brussels and Amsterdam, Europe is a strong, vibrant place, coping, in fits and coughs with a wholly new concept of immigration and assimilation, but prospering, thriving and enriching itself and its people, materially and culturally, nonetheless."

Europe is dying. Their Unemployment rate is aound 9-10%. Their population is aging and they're having no kids. The ones who are having kids are the Mulsim immigrants. They are not integrating into Europe. In their Mosques they openly brag about conquering Europe. They caused riots in France and murederd an in Hollan Theo Van Gogh. The Islamic culture is radically different than Europe's. Here in Florida, I run into Euros all the time. They tellme about how Muslims youths control some parts of time at night. The Left in Europe supports the Islamic radicals.
However there's hopr.
In France a politician who's brave enough to stand up to the Leftist-Islamic elite is leading in the Polls. He's the Giulliani of France.
Nicolas Sarkozsky. He's anti-Islamic and realizes the threat of UIslamic immigration. Some European Politicians are now talking about freezing Islamic immigration and emphasizing Latin American or Christian Afrifcan immigrants since they can integrate better.
Bye praising the Islamic threat to Europe you've exposed the pro-Islamic tendency of the Left.
Great Thanks for making my point!

Brandon:

Read my post again...a little more carefully this time. If you do that, you will find I'm not "defending Olbermann' nearly as much as I am attacking Johnny, this site, and the actions and the motivations of both.

The 'cure' is far worse than the disease!

Mike,
Why do you defend Olbermann is Desk Jockey and not a real Journalist.

How many times has Brandon or Jeff used deragatory terms to describe others? How many times should they have apologized for that? More times than I can count. That is not defendable in any way, shape, or form, yet, the Olber-Obsessed here certainly do try just like Brandon above.
Posted by: The Righteous Brothers at March 27, 2007 4:49 PM

The real irony here that the Olber-Obsessed don’t seem to grasp is that in their bitter misplaced hatred of Olbermann, they have become him.

> One definition of "conflict of interest" would be operating a Fox (Faux) 'News' lovefest blog, and then taking compensation to administer a smear site of a Fox rival

Well lets look at some more lies from Mike. At least they appear to be lies since he cites no evidence.

A Fox lovefest blog? Perhaps you can quote something I wrote over there expressing adoration or love for Fox. Oh wait, actually citing quotes to prove your case is something you can't be bothered with.

And taking compensation to administer OW? 1. Prove I'm taking compensation. B. Prove I'm "administering" this site.

Good going, Mike. You're batting a thousand.

"Good going Mike, You're batting a thousand."

You're damned right I am. You political hack!

righteous nothing, go back and read lil mikey's posts, he has called everybody that has ever proven him wrong every name in the book, look at o'leillys posts, same thing, look at that loon that calls everybody that supports our (even some that don't)a "bushwipe" over and over. Even little miss philby has resorted to name calling from way atop her socialist soap box. Let alone, all the olbyloons that make "anon" jabs and run for cover.

I only use language to describe the Olbyloons tha Olbermann himself has used on his show to describe others. Apparently, actually, truthfully, irony is LOST on Olbermann and his insane band of followers, from Mike, "I don't apologize for him" when he does, and the rest who are too ashamed to even sign their own name to their posts.

Now, let's move on to another of Olbermann's lies shall we? Check out the comments of Chris Wallace in the radio interview. Olbermann quoted him incorrectly and smeared him needlessly. Now Olbermann coud apologize for this and retract his error. But he won't do that because Olbermann is not a "truth-teller", he's a lie-spreader.

"I only use language to describe the Olbyloons tha Olbermann himself has used on his show to describe others..."

"...they have become him."

I rest my case...

Hey Johnny, lil mikey said I have no credibility, now, you have no credibility, either. I think he said the same thing about Brandon. This, coming from someone who claims to speak for Conservatives, moderates AND liberals. How come he isn't on MSNBC?

RoyalPain:

"someone who claims to speak for Conservatives, moderates AND liberals".

Show us where I 'claimed' that, you pathological liar.

"they have become him" (but worse)...no truer words have ever been written.

>1. Prove I'm taking compensation. B. Prove I'm "administering" this site.

First of all, just because you can't prove something doesn't mean it isn't true. Can you prove to me that you have an IQ over 65? You haven't yet, and I'm not holding my breath for proof anytime soon.

Second, perhaps you do whatever it is you do here for free...there are whores that won't take money. They don't get a lot of repeat business, but they are free. Jeff and Brandon told me about them. Prove they didn't...

If I go away for a period of time, he steps up his lies and taunts in an obvious attempt to draw me out again. For Jeff, nothing is about 'truth' because he really believes I am the 'enemy'.

Posted by: Mike at March 27, 2007 4:02 PM
lil mikey, there you go again, twisting away, I've never said you were the enemy, you have defended the enemy on several occasions ,but, I have never refered to you as the enemy. Now, lets move on,ok?

> First of all, just because you can't prove something doesn't mean it isn't true.

This lofty standard of proof can only mean one thing: the infamous, deplorable Keith Olbermann himself is posting here!

> First of all, just because you can't prove something doesn't mean it isn't true.

This lofty standard of proof can only mean one thing: the infamous, deplorable Keith Olbermann himself is posting here!
Posted by: johnny dollar at March 27, 2007 5:43 PM

C'mon Johnny, certainly even you understand that there can be proof for something, proof against something, and such a thing as not enough available evidence to come to a conclusion for or against.

The absence of evidence is NOT evidence of absence. This is the very thing that the religious cling to. Prove God exists....Prove he doesn't exist, etc.

I'm sure you'll agree, even with the internet at one's disposal, one isn't always able to attain evidence of something suspected of being true. Does that make it more or less true? No, it does neither.

I suggest perhaps you enroll at your local junior college and take some courses in logic and reasoning if you are going to continue to try to debate folks here on the nature of proof.

...And while your at it, take a course on politics. You might learn something...

...And while your at it, take a course on politics. You might learn something...
Posted by: The Righteous Brothers at March 27, 2007 6:21 PM

That should be the contraction 'you're' not your. At least I'm self-editing. Others here should try it sometime.

> such a thing as not enough available evidence to come to a conclusion for or against.

Of course. And people who insist that something in that category is in fact absolutely true are irresponsible hacks.

Hmmmmmmm...

"Bill O'Reilly" "lapdog" - 95 hits
"Keith Olbermann" "lapdog" - 13,000

And the biggest lapdog is...
Posted by: JohnE at March 26, 2007 11:13 PM

Try this-

Bill O'Reilly is a Lapdog - 49,700 hits
Keith Olbermann is a Lapdog - 28,000 hits

And the REAL biggest lapdog is...

> such a thing as not enough available evidence to come to a conclusion for or against.

Of course. And people who insist that something in that category is in fact absolutely true are irresponsible hacks.
Posted by: johnny dollar at March 27, 2007 6:26 PM

Okay, let's see....

Jeff says that there are no innocent prisoners at Gitmo, they were ALL caught red handed with Guns, Bombs, Etc.

I say bullsh-t...

He says prove it.

Mike says you get paid for your time here.

You, while neither confirming nor denying say, 'Prove it.'

So, does the burden of proof fall on the person making the assertion or the person refuting the assertion?

I guess if you are one of the Olber-Obsessed, it just depends on which side you are on. The OTHER side always has to 'Prove It.'

Nice way to debate....

And Hypocritical....

And not a surprise...

righteous nothing, you asserted this morning, that, there were innocent people in Gitmo, I said find one piece of evidence stating so, and you are trying to put the burden of proof on meto prove otherwise? I hope you are not a lawyer. Who's full of sh-t? You.

The Righteous Brothers writes:

"Second, perhaps you do whatever it is you do here for free...there are whores that won't take money. They don't get a lot of repeat business, but they are free."

And:

"I'm sure you'll agree, even with the internet at one's disposal, one isn't always able to attain evidence of something suspected of being true. Does that make it more or less true? No, it does neither."

And:

"I guess if you are one of the Olber-Obsessed, it just depends on which side you are on. The OTHER side always has to 'Prove It.'

Nice way to debate....

And Hypocritical...."

I think the reasoning above rates as not only "having your cake and eating it too" but "having your cake, eating it, and lobbing it at your target.

Hey I was just over at 'The Bung Hole'. To leave a note for Keith and the crew how I loved Chris Wallace saying ' He couldn't cover a two alarm fire.'

Ya know there was only 12 comments for last nights show.

Not one disagreed with Keith!!!!

Amazing!!!!!

Could 12 people constitute 'Zombie Nation'?

FYI,

I updated this post with a few things...

1) the video of the Special Comment on Delay

2) A deconstruction of a neatly layered set of lies within the Special Comment

3) a Link to the MSNBC transcript from the show

Things like facts and the use of irony never get in the way of the standard Oblyloon post. It's so good to know some things never change.

I went to Google, typed in "Katy Tur Slut" and got 3,460 hits... yikes!

Az életvédő honlap: www.grain.hu

Az életvédő honlap: www.grain.hu