OlbermannWatch.com "My Faves" Set
OlbermannWatch.com Favorited Photos from other Flickr Users
Got OlbyPhotos? See some on Flickr? DO NOT email us. Send us a FlickrMail instead. Include a link to the photo. If we like the photo you will see it displayed in the Olby Flickr Flood above.
New to Flickr? Sign up for a FREE Flickr account!
New to YouTube? Sign up for a FREE YouTube account!
Links to OlbermannWatch.com
Blog posts tagged with "Olbermann"|
|
| Subscribe to Olbermann Watch Mailing List |
| Visit this group |
We knew that the reaction would not be a good one in Loonland when word broke that Olbermann tried to score with Mary Carey.As usual, there was the standard disclaimer that you can't believe the NY Post because the evil Rupert Murdoch owns it. Or that the person doing the claiming is a porn star. But what they cannot explain is why she was such a favorite guest of his until ooh, right around the time the turn-down would have occured. We knew the Olbyloons would be in hyperdrive about this but we had no idea one of them would write a 10,000 word missive on it. Here, in full, we present the ramblings of one Olbyloon who is an Obessive Olbypologist. She claims her name is Kathy, aparently her role model is Kathy Bates in Misery.
Look.It does not surprise me at all that the Keith-haters are trying to attack him again. They needed to do that; his star was just riding too high, and it was long past time to try shooting him down again.
What does surprise me is that they were actually able to secure the cooperation of Mary Carey to help them do their dirty work. But why should I be surprised? As she once said of the similarity between herself and the Republicans: "We both screw people!" So, yes, I do feel a bit amused that I am sitting here saying "Mary Carey...do something just for the MONEY?? I'm shocked...shocked!" (No, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if someone paid her to say this. Then again, maybe she's just pissed off that Keith rejected her, and decided it would be fun to take revenge on him during a radio show. That's actually the more likely story. It did seem to me that when they were together on his show, Keith was amused by her, but he didn't play along with any of her come-ons. And she may not be used to men like that.)
Do note, however, how fast and loose these stories play with the truth. Mary claims to have a voicemail in which Keith asked her out, but has the voicemail emerged? Did she keep it?
Second, Keith didn't have Mary as a guest on his show "once in 2003." He had her on his show twice in 2005 and once more sometime last year, I believe. They couldn't even get those details right.
Third, note he is identified only as an "MSNBC talk host." This makes him sound like the host of a talk show, not a news program. They're also careful to ID him as a "former sportscaster"...helps make him sound more like a horndog attracted to obviously hot women. (There are, of course, other small details inserted to make the whole thing sound worse...for example, the description of the voice mail as "rambling." Obviously, the point was to make it sound as if Keith was under the influence of something when he left the we-don't-know-it-exists message. When, well, those who know him knows he can "ramble" even when he's sober, but no matter.)
Fourth, I hardly think Katy qualifies as a "college gal." I believe the statute of limitations has run out on that as a description of her. If so, then I, too, qualify as a "college gal"...and I graduated from college before Katy was born.
In short, Rupert Murdoch and his minions are back on the trail again...they finally realized that if they really wanted to slam Keith with a "horndog" reputation, a nobody like Karmabites just wasn't going to cut it. They needed someone with a name and, dare I say, a reputation...someone who was willing to play ball...and they found her. Either by paying her to do it, or by carefully scrutinizing every tidbit of mention they could find of him in the media, and pouncing when they found this one. ("A porn star says on the radio that she rejected Keith...YESSSSSS!!!!! WE GOT A LIVE ONE!!!!!!")
Of course, they were more than willing to use Karma again for what good she did...they dredged her up again...and at least the Pest bothers to call Katy a "college grad."
Unfortunately the waters are so muddied in all this nonsense that I fear the Pest is going to be able to gain some traction as a result from people who will actually believe it. Keith's "flack" (whoever that is) didn't help matters any by saying "It's a well documented fact that Keith is off the market." First of all, Keith's not married and not even engaged, so he's not really "off the market." Second, only in the past few months have there been any news items acknowledging his relationship, so that hardly constitutes a "well documented fact." Third, even if you buy the idea that "in a relationship" = "off the market" and that a few newspaper/magazine articles (we won't count the Dan Patrick Show because what gets said on it normally doesn't reveberate throughout the media universe) constitute a "well documented fact"...well, Keith was NOT "off the market" last June, when Mary claims she got this voice mail. (In fact, the whole thing sounds as if it was deliberately targeted to upset Katy, infuriating her into thinking she was only Keith's "second choice" after a XXX porn star turned him down.)
If you ask me, this is a direct shot across the bow--it's time to attack Keith again, using the "wedge issue" his haters think is most likely to succeed in divesting him of his "librul" fans, especially the female ones: Paint him as a misogynist, skirt-chasing horndog. And if you can foment upset and doubt in the head of his young, impressionable girlfriend and possibly bring about the end of his relationship with her as a result, well then, that's icing on the cake.
Hey! Something just occurred to me. We're supposed to believe that Keith asked Mary out, yet she turned him down because she had a boyfriend at the time. You know, just like any other woman might. Because, as we all know, Mary Carey would never try to date two men at once. Or have sex with two men at once. Or anything like that!!!!
When you think about it, really...! THAT's comedy!
Well she is right about one thing, her rant is indeed, sheer comic genius. And of course, serves as a role model to Olbyapologists everywhere I'm sure.
Click on the Loonand link, the "girls" are turning on each other...great stuff!
I love when one outsnots the other. No wonder they love Olberloser - they're as pseudo-intelletual as he is.
“Keith’s not married and not even engaged, so he’s not really ‘off the market’”
Can you spell Olbydenial? Didn’t his “people/flak give this response. So now they’re not even believing Keith’s reps? Who will they believe?
Wait--there's more! She just posted this. She's chiding another poster "Marie" for talking about this, AFTER she's posted a 10,000 word essay on it.
"I know damn well what was motivating this item. It was probably two-edged...both political AND personal. But, by golly, if Katy Tur is so preternaturally mature and brilliant for her age as you would have us think she must be, why on earth would she believe any of this silliness for a second?
I don't think that what I said gave it any sort of "respect" at all. Quite the opposite. If my "debunking" gives it more weight than it should have (and I don't think it does), what does your bringing it up in the first place give it? You can't have it both ways.
I quoted the details chapter and verse...and shot 'em all down, except one. But that one doesn't really matter, because everything else I said negates it quite neatly.
I say, Marie, you've got to pick either one side or the other. You've got to decide that either this stuff isn't worth mentioning at all--even to debunk it--or you've got to decide it's worth mentioning just long enough TO debunk it.
Think about it. A lot of people thought it made sense for John Kerry not to address the stream of lies the Swift Boaters spewed out at him, because it was just so much absurdity aimed at a man who had nothing to prove: He was a war hero, and it was insulting to think he should even HAVE to defend himself against that crap. But there are others who thought he didn't address it soon enough. He didn't have his people debunk it swiftly and neatly and get it out of the way, so it didn't dog him and become an all-important issue when it never even should have caused a ripple. And some say that even if it didn't cost him the Presidency, it sure didn't help.
And it's not like I see Keith staying silent when Rumsfeld calls war opponents "appeasers," or when Tom DeLay compares Democrats to Hitler. No. He speaks.
He doesn't speak (at least not much) on the personal poo flung his way because it's better to let others speak for him. And that's exactly what I did. I don't know that it'll make a difference; people will believe what they want to believe, proof or no. But I had my say. And it's not as if, had I remained silent, nobody would have heard anything.
So, make up your mind, Marie. Either say nothing at all, or debunk. Those are your choices."
Update: The Krazies have delete the entire thread.ROFLMAO!
Thanks Brandon for getting what you got. I was so looking forward to reading the carnage this morning.
By the way what does ROFLMOA mean? (yes I am a dork).
Wouldn't it be neat if Robert Cox was working for Keith Olbermann and this whole thing was one long publicity stunt. Stranger things have happened....
Goodness the loons really turned on each other over the "Keith & the Porn Star" stuff the other day. Unfortunately they removed the entire thread and some of the comments complaining about it.
This is all that was left:
"Marie: If it was decided that there should be no more posts on it, it could have been locked, and the record of what was said preserved."
"OlbermannBuiltMyHotRod: drop it, Marie. the thread is gone. it is the consensus of the Mods and Admins that it was in the best interests of the board. just let it go. please. i should have locked it last night, but what's done is done and it's not coming back. we'd really prefer that the entire subject be left alone."
"Marie: I am disappointed in this action. "
It got very ugly with Michael saying to Marie he was taking her 'toy' away and to take her f---ING meds (or something to that effect). She replied something like "back at ya". It showed Michael really very unhinged (like in previous comments when he had an arguement with Mr. Cox and called him an a--hole and stuff. I wonder if that thread is still there?)
I know this is silly "soap opera" kind of stuff, but it is kind of fascinating to read how there are super-fans within the fans that do not want any criticism of their hero. Its like they think Olbermann is reading it or something and they don't want to piss him off. Very odd bunch.
Brandon, if you still do your occassional Loon-alert, you better grab the stuff fast because it looks like they will edit and delete stuff very quickly.