GE makes the weapons that kill
For the war, they're sending the bill
If Keith's so irate
Why doesn't he hate
GE? 'Cuz his hand's in the till

AND CHANEY MAKES ABOUT 100 M A YEAR ON HALLIBURTON. WHAT'S YOU POINT, IDIOT!

The unknown Olbyfan writes yet again only to exhibit not only his/her undying loyalty to Keith Olbermann but his/her vitriol and lack of common sense. The basic fact that the unknown Olbyfan misses (or chooses to ignore) the blatant hypocrisy of Soros purchasing stock in Halliburton shows beyond a reasonable doubt the unknown Olbyfan's disingenuousness (or ignorance). If this is the same person who has been posting comments in other threads without an indentifying monicker, then said person shows a consistent use of ad hominem, non sequitur and other logical falacies. If the person is among a group of Olbyfans not using any identifying monicker, then it shows a pattern of poor behavior and thought processes by staunch Olbyfans. Either way, the Olbyfan of note in this instance has already rendered any point they attempt to make completely moot by his/her posts containing such unintelligent and immature materials. Furthermore, they now lack any credibility in subsequent postings which makes whatever he/she writes in the future not worthy of any consideration. Until this person (or persons) can exhibit a consistent ability to post in a mature manner, sticking to the subjects at hand without stooping to the poor behaviors that killed any effectiveness in his/her words I strongly urge all right-minded, intelligent individuals to ignore the person's posts.

AND CHANEY MAKES ABOUT 100 M A YEAR ON HALLIBURTON. WHAT'S YOU POINT, IDIOT!

Posted by: at March 17, 2007 2:14 PM

Can you please provide your source?

So much for free speech over at Watching Olbermann Watch. Tried to post a comment and I guess the blogger didn't like what I had to say because it was never posted. It was a fairly innocuous comment, an observation, really. I simply said after watching Olbermann, lo these many years, it's painfully obvious that cleverness is a gift. Try as he might (and oh has he tried), Olbermann will never attain what he covets
most -- wit. He wasn't funny on ESPN. He wasn't funny on Fox. And he certainly isn't funny on MSNBC. Having failed at humor, Keith has settled for the role of "patriot," which is, well . . . funny. These "Special Coments" leave me in stitches. As Keith pans for camera 2, I can't help but think of the Saturday Live skit with the sudden close up of Dan Akroyd stating: "Fred Garvin -- Male Prostitute." Say what you want about Robert Cox, he is clever, intentionally so.

And Olbermann is funny, totally in an unintentional way with those "special comments" of his.

Thank you, Bob, for yet again exposing the leftist hypocrites. I'd ask why MSM has barely uttered a peep about Soros' war profiteering, but I already know the answer. The socialists won't bite the hand that feeds them, even if its palm has been greased by Halliburton profits.

Well it's a step in the right direction that the GalPals have enabled comments on WOW but don't hold your breath waiting for a critical word about Olbermann appearing on that site. They would never risk the possibility that Keith might break up with his girlfriend and call them for a quick romantic encounter.

And that's their ultimate goal: have Keith give them a ring and whisk them away from their miserable existances. Olbermann likes 'em young, not over the hill and bitter like the galpals.

AND CHANEY MAKES ABOUT 100 M A YEAR ON HALLIBURTON. WHAT'S YOU POINT, IDIOT!

Posted by: at March 17, 2007 2:14 PM
Cheney makes nothing on Haliburton, idiot! You've been watching way too much Ulbermahn. Do you watch it twice every night like Mikey does?

For the record, that jeff on wow is not me! I tried to make a post asking what was so "sick and twisted" about Bob's e-mail, we'll see if it gets posted.

Posted by: at March 17, 2007 2:14 PM
Cheney makes nothing on Haliburton, idiot! You've been watching way too much Ulbermahn. Do you watch it twice every night like Mikey does?

Posted by: jeff at March 17, 2007 6:28 PM

And if you think Chaney is not making money on his Halliburton stock, that he did not sell, you've been watching too much FOX. IDIOT!!!!!

And if you think Chaney is not making money on his Halliburton stock, that he did not sell, you've been watching too much FOX. IDIOT!!!!!

Posted by: at March 17, 2007 7:13 PM
olbyloon, Vice President Cheney was required by law to sell his Hali stock when he took office, but, since you only watch Ulbermahn, you wouldn't know this. Keep on brainwashing yourself. Pitiful. Nice original name calling, did you learn that at the "puffington" post? They seem to do alot of childish name calling there, too.

> CHANEY [sic] MAKES ABOUT 100 M A YEAR ON HALLIBURTON. WHAT'S YOU [sic] POINT, IDIOT!

Maybe this is why our courageous, anonymous poster didn't provide a source as requested:

http://www.factcheck.org/article261.html

The misinformation people go around with because they believe the lies of Olbermann and his ilk!

Cheney makes nothing on Haliburton, idiot! You've been watching way too much Ulbermahn.

olbyloon, Vice President Cheney was required by law to sell his Hali stock when he took office, but, since you only watch Ulbermahn, you wouldn't know this.

I only call someone and IDIOT when they do it first.
If you think Chaney actually sold his stock and didn't put it a blind trust, you are dreaming. He thinks he is above the law, or havn't you noticed with your blinder on.

STOP THE PRESSES!!!

BREAKING NEWS!!

Thousands of PRO-WAR SUPPORTERS DEMONSTRATE IN D.C.!!!

Oh... wait... Soros making money off the BUSHWIPE FAILED WAR is more important than the FEW PRO-WAR SUPPORTERS that showed up.

DAMN EVEEEEL SOROS!!
DAMN EVEEEEL G.E.!!
DAMN EVEEEEL MicroSoft!!!

It's your war! Bush Supporters!
AND YOUR BUSHWIPE IN CHIEF!!
Enjoy your shietsandwitch.

DAMN YOU PIRTYSAN SSSSSSECULIRIST PROGGGGGGRESSSIVES!!

Now, let's take a look a the latest BARE BOOBED TEACHER SEX SCANDAL!

Your humble hack,
Ourtraged Santimonious Billdo

I clearly recall Olbermann questioning why Soros made this investment.

I clearly recall YOU Bush Supporters getting your panties in a bunch over MSNBC showing an "ANTI-AMERICAN" segment.

Oh, wait... you Bush Supporters still are..

Well you Bush Supporters,
I don't suppose you Bush Supporters are bitchin away from the inconvenience of your Linux boxes.

DAMN MicroSoft_NBC!!

DAMN YOU G.E.!!

I'M SOOOOO OUTRAGED AND SANTIMONIOUS... I'M ABOUT TO START GROWING MY OWN LIGHT BULBS!!!

AND DEVELOP MY OWN O.S.!!

TREMBLE YOU SSSSICULIRIST PROGGGGRESTIVS!!

GAWD! I need a Large Fallafel! Hold the fallafel, JUST THE LOOFAH!!

I only call someone and IDIOT when they do it first.
If you think Chaney actually sold his stock and didn't put it a blind trust, you are dreaming. He thinks he is above the law, or havn't you noticed with your blinder on.

Posted by: at March 17, 2007 9:15 PM
einstein, where is your evidence? I'll be waiting........

Oh, I know, maybe Cheney called Ted "the murderer" Kennedy and got some advice on hiding money, he's an expert at it.

[url=][/url]

I'm waiting for the evidence that the Fox viewers showed up en masse to support the failed war that the BUSHWIPE talking heads keep promoting.

I'm having a little trouble here...

ANY OF YOU FELLOW Bush Supporters CAN MAKE OIL FLOW FROM FREEDUMBS?

Olberman is the most fairest news man in the business. He's fair and gives both sides a chance to explain themselves.

Billdo,
Don't you love Olbermann's fairness?

I clearly recall Olbermann questioning why Soros made this investment in Haliburton.

Exactly Olbermann is fair. He has no political opiniosn and only speaks the truth.
He goes after Dems the same way he attacks Reps!

>>Olberman is the most fairest news man in the business. He's fair and gives both sides a chance to explain themselves.

No.

El Billdo is the most fairest. Not to mention the most independest.

That's why EL BILLDO LENDS HIS HOLY BULLY PULPIT TO FAIR AND BALANCED BUSHWIPE APOLOGISTS LIKE MICHELLE MALIKIN.

That spells FAIR AND BALANCED BUSHWIPERY right there.

DAMN YOU ESSSSTRIMIST ANTI AMIIIIIRICAN MicroSOFT_NBC!!

Can I connect my BILLDO to the traffic light outside?

I clearly recall Olbermann questioning why Soros made this investment in Haliburton.

It has been pointed out that this is not BushWatch.com, but it just might br SorosWatch.com.

It has been pointed out that this is not BushWatch.com, but it just might br SorosWatch.com.

Posted by: at March 17, 2007 11:54 PM
If you could read you would know that this thread is dedicated to soreass.

That's why EL BILLDO LENDS HIS HOLY BULLY PULPIT TO FAIR AND BALANCED BUSHWIPE APOLOGISTS LIKE MICHELLE MALIKIN.

I love Michelle Malkin, she is a hot little number and she kicks ass on libs, that's why they hate her.

>>I love Michelle Malkin, she is a hot little number and she kicks ass on libs, that's why they hate her.

Uh... oh... El BILLDO sez not to get personal, only El BILLDO can.

Here's a memo from Master Spinner El BILLDO:

When the SSCULIRIST PREGRISS_ST laugh at us Bush Supporters, then we Bush Supporters CLAIM to be VICTIMS OF HATE-ATTACKS.

Then we Bush Supporters can move forward to present INDEEEEPINDINT LBRUL voices like
Tammy Bruce (LOL) to confirm the VISSSCIOUS ATTACK FROM THE SSSSCULIRISTS!!

NEXT UP ON EL BILLDO'S REPEATING POINTS!!

Laura (Call Chris Matthews to see if they give me 5 minutes in MSNBC) Ingraham!! (LOL)

Uh... oh... El BILLDO sez not to get personal, only El BILLDO can.

Here's a memo from Master Spinner El BILLDO:

When the SSCULIRIST PREGRISS_ST laugh at us Bush Supporters, then we Bush Supporters CLAIM to be VICTIMS OF HATE-ATTACKS.

Then we Bush Supporters can move forward to present INDEEEEPINDINT LBRUL voices like
Tammy Bruce (LOL) to confirm the VISSSCIOUS ATTACK FROM THE SSSSCULIRISTS!!

NEXT UP ON EL BILLDO'S REPEATING POINTS!!

Laura (Call Chris Matthews to see if they give me 5 minutes in MSNBC) Ingraham!! (LOL)

Posted by: Outraged Sanctimonious Billdo at March 18, 2007 12:53 AM
Is there a message or point in there, somewhere?

Well it's a step in the right direction that the GalPals have enabled comments on WOW but don't hold your breath waiting for a critical word about Olbermann appearing on that site. They would never risk the possibility that Keith might break up with his girlfriend and call them for a quick romantic encounter.

Posted by: Robert Cox at March 17, 2007 5:54 PM

----------------

The Galpals have enabled comments? I'll have to stop by; they never cease to amuse me. As for Olbermann ditching his "buddy" list just because he has a girlfriend, I doubt that to be true. He doesn't have to break up with his girlfriend to email one of them for a quick romantic encounter.

>>Is there a message or point in there, somewhere?

Of course there is.

We Bush Supporters ARE VICTIMS OF HATE-ATTACKS.

Let's look at the latest incursion from the NEA!

SEX TEACHER SHOCKERS!!

At least 13 cases just this year!

DAMN YOU PREGRISSSIVE SEEEQUILIRITS!!!

DAMN YOU G.E.!!

DAMN YOU N.E.A.!!

Anon wrote:

"I clearly recall Olbermann questioning why Soros made this investment in Haliburton"

He did not "question why" he asked a question about why.

We already addressed this here:
http://www.olbermannwatch.com/archives/2007/03/countdown_with_227.php

The topic raised raised, very briefly, on Countdown this last Monday, March 12, 2007. You can read the entire transcript here: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17594715/

The exchange on this topic went something like this...

OLBERMANN: [why] would a liberal linchpin like George Soros have bought 1.9 million shares in their company less than a month ago?

GIRALDI: ...I would imagine Soros sees it as a good investment.

If YOU are "questioning" the accuracy of my post, I would suggest you re-read the post, visit the links provided and you will find that Keith spent more time defending Soros on March 1st then he did on the topic of Soros' Halliburton investment. In other words, my post is entirely accurate.

Keith "Edward R. Murrow Award" Olbermann can't even get the simplest facts straight. Soros did not buy Halliburton shares "less than a month ago". All that was been reported so far is that Soros bought HAL shares between October and December of 2006. This information was contained in the quarterly filing with the SEC for Soros's Fund for the period ending 12/31/06 which was made public by the SEC the week before. Unless Soros is sharing this information with Keith (which would not surprise anyone here), we are not going to know what stocks Soros was buying "a month ago" until May 2007.

It's a minor point but Soros bought 1,995,000 shares not "1.9 million shares"; if KO wanted to do some rounding he might want to have done what EVERY OTHER NEWS OUTLET DID and report "2 million shares". A quick check of Lexis/Nexis shows that MSNBC is the ONLY major news outlet to have rounded the Soros purchase DOWN by 95,000 shares.

Yep.. Soros bought those shares in a company that makes a lot of money by stealing from the American people.. Hopefully Soros will use more of his money to bring to an end the reign of terror that this pile of sh-t administration has brought upon us.. Then piles of sh-t like Hannity and O'Reilly can say how they are evil.. It sure would be nice if the left was as violent as the right. If that was the case people like Hannity, Coulter, O'Reilly, Levin and the like would have targets on vital organs.

Bottom line in the liberal mind-set, if Soros buys stock in Halliburton, it's no longer an evil organization.

Yep.. Soros bought those shares in a company that makes a lot of money by stealing from the American people.. Hopefully Soros will use more of his money to bring to an end the reign of terror that this pile of sh-t administration has brought upon us.. Then piles of sh-t like Hannity and O'Reilly can say how they are evil.. It sure would be nice if the left was as violent as the right. If that was the case people like Hannity, Coulter, O'Reilly, Levin and the like would have targets on vital organs.

Posted by: Bill O'lielly at March 18, 2007 11:30 AM
liar, you make posts like this and have the nerve to call the right violent? Coming from you, not surprised.

If you could read you would know that this thread is dedicated to soreass.

Posted by: jeff at March 18, 2007 12:12 AM

I thought this entire website was dedicated to stalking KO. ME THINKS Johnny$ is AKA
JEFF, BRANDON AND COX. That would account for 4 of the 20 posters on this pathetic site. ME ALSO THINKS, that these constant discussions of keith's bimbos, penis size, hypocrisy and so called lies are getting a bit old.

chimpy/burgerking, you seem to be the one bringing up bimbo's,penis's more than anybody. Hypocritic? Yes, indeed.

O'Lielly wake up and smell the money. Soros did, which is why he invested in Halliburton. He's not riding a white horse into an eeeevil empire to vanquish anyone. Spare us. He's a billionaire, and the one thing he loves more than anything is raking in the cash. And if that means investing in a corporation that his minions have spent so much effort demonizing, then he'll do just that. It's all about the Benjamins, not the Democrats.

At least Olbermann doesn't claim to be "fair and balanced".

Think about it.

Roberts, thanks for at least admitting that Keith DID question why Soros invested in Haliburton. As I'm sure you are well aware, anyone relying on your little write - up at the top of this thread would have come away this the MISCONCEPTION that Olbermann never questioned it at all.

You then followed up with a long winded explanation of why KO's question didn't probe deeply enough to satisfy you, along with an exercise in semantics about the difference between calling it 1.9 million or 2 million dollars in stock.

In other words, as always, what you did is every bit as biased and journalistically dishonest as anything you and J$ routinely accuse Keith Olbermann of doing.

What's to think about? He's not fair and balanced. He's a leftist ideological hack (who has claimed he is not).

No one said he didn't mention it; we just said that he did not analyze the topic. He asked one question about it to a FOO (friend of Olby), which has the same effect as being in an echo chamber. The subject quickly changed after the question was asked.

Actually, Olbermann has claimed not to be political, not to be a liberal, not to care about either party time and time again. Until a few weeks ago when he admitted on the radio show he does with Dan Patick that he was a liberal. So you see, he DOES claim to be "fair and balanced", depending upon who is doing the interviewing. And that makes him a liar since he's contradicted himself in statements, and it also makes him a hypocrite. It also disqualifies him to host a NEWS show unless said "news show" is relabled corretly for what it really is, an OPINION-fest.

"We report, you decide". "fair and balanced". LOL

Unlike Olby, who decides then pretends to report.

Unlike Fox, which spikes or under-reports almost every story of actual significance. But you can find out all about the latest local rape and abuse cases there.

>>Glenn Beck on Liberal Olbermann

Today on CNN, Glenn Beck was asked about the attacks directed at him by Keith Oralmann:

Big Fugging Deal.

4:11, please explain what you mean by Fox underreports every story of actual significance? What stories do you consider significant?

Unlike Fox, which spikes or under-reports almost every story of actual significance. But you can find out all about the latest local rape and abuse cases there.

Posted by: at March 18, 2007 4:11 PM
Exposing rapists and child predators is a bad thing? Ulbermahn condoning is a good thing? Wow.

In other words, as always, what you did is every bit as biased and journalistically dishonest as anything you and J$ routinely accuse Keith Olbermann of doing.

Posted by: at March 18, 2007 3:08 PM
In other words, you missed the whole point or points.

In other words, as always, what you did is every bit as biased and journalistically dishonest as anything you and J$ routinely accuse Keith Olbermann of doing.

Posted by: at March 18, 2007 3:08 PM
In other words, you missed the whole point or points.

"In other words, you missed the whole point or points."

Not at all, but my point stands on a much higher ethical ground than your's; If you're going to blast someone for being biased, you had better not be biased yourself.

SWEET!

>Tony Blair faces the prospect of an International Criminal Court investigation for alleged coalition war crimes in Iraq.

The court's chief prosecutor told The Sunday Telegraph that he would be willing to launch an inquiry and could envisage a scenario in which the Prime Minister and American President George W Bush could one day face charges at The Hague.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/03/18/nirq118.xml

Have fun you Bush Supporters !

Have fun you Bush Supporters !

Posted by: average american patriot at March 18, 2007 4:50 PM

I read a comment not long ago where someone asked if an HRC supporter was a "rodwipe".

I think a better one along that vein would have been for LBJ, which would have then made supporters Johnsonwipes. However, the rodwipe for Hillary would have butch connotations as well, so it would be doubly pejorative.

On the Republican side there's always the possibility of a Brownbackwipe. Talk about a pejorative!

>Brownbackwipe. Talk about a pejorative!

"Anybody But Brownback!"
http://www.rainbowtel.net/~bryants/abb.htm

ROFL!!

Anon,

It would not surprise me that you were unable to read a clearly written post. We already reported on KO asking a question about Soros purchase of Halliburton on Monday. So there is nothing to "admit".

"You then followed up with a long winded explanation of why KO's question didn't probe deeply enough to satisfy you"

Really, when was that?

"an exercise in semantics about the difference between calling it 1.9 million or 2 million dollars in stock"

Ummm...actually its SHARES of stock not DOLLARS. If you cannot understand that from the post above then I am not surprised you were confused elsewhere. I also said it is a MINOR point but reflects the mindset of Olbermann. His approach is to ignore or minimize anything that does not comport to his worldview. Either that or he was to lazy to read beyond the first two numbers in "1,995,000" and just saw that "1" and the "9".

I do not recall either J$ or myself ever claiming to be journalists or that we were unbiased in our posts so your comparison between the two of us and Olbermann makes about as much sense as the rest of your comment which is to say "none".

>>I do not recall either J$ or myself ever claiming to be journalists or that we were unbiased in our posts so your comparison between the two of us and Olbermann makes about as much sense as the rest of your comment which is to say "none".

SHOCKING REVELATIONS!!

Nobody had ever noticed that Robert Cox and Johnny Bu$hwipe were NOT journalists but instead mediocre right wing hacks.

Nobody had ever noticed that Robert Cox and Johnny Bu$hwipe were NOT journalists but instead mediocre right wing hacks.

Posted by: average american patriot at March 18, 2007 7:15 PM
What's the name of your blog? Oh, you don't have one. You just criticize people that criticize people you agree with (olby). Now I understand.

Jeff, do you ever do anything but come to this blog and post stupid stuff night and day? Oh, I forget, you do whatever it is you do with your daddy's horses the rest of the time.

Johnny$, Cox, Jeff and Brandon are one and the same.

>>What's the name of your blog? Oh, you don't have one. You just criticize people that criticize people you agree with (olby). Now I understand.

LOL!!

So now, everyone posting on the web NEEDS a blog to have some credibility.

I'm going to start a new blogger's association, to emulate the MBA's and thus gain web creed.

I don't know.

Maybe my target market will be the evangelico-bushwipe wing.
I'm sure I can find a few evangelico morons who will send me $25 a piece to belong and be listed and linked from my blog.
I'm sure I can find a devoted Cox-sucker as Johnny $ to write some irrelevant tripe to keep the site "fresh".

How about you Jeff?
Maybe you can be my Johnny $ucks_Cox?

"Johnny$, Cox, Jeff and Brandon are one and the same."

Let me guess, they are Redwolf! An evil spawn of the Klan!

Cox; "I do not recall J$ or myself ever claiming to be journalists or that we were unbiased in our posts so your comparison between the two of us and Olbermann so your comment makes about as much sense as the rest of your post which is "none".

You seem to be acknowleging Olbermann's statue as a "journalist", which is something I've nsver done.

It's Olbermann who insists he's a journalist. And who keeps trying to claim that he's not biased, not a liberal (in direct contradiction of his statement on ESPN Radio recently). Why are you arguing with us? Why don't you go ask Olbermann why he insists he's not a liberal, not biased, etc?

You seem to be acknowleging Olbermann's statue as a "journalist", which is something I've nsver done.

Posted by: at March 18, 2007 8:04 PM

Now that's compelling...

Next you'll refuse to acknowledge that Olbermann exists and use that as an accusation against critics here.

Brandon: Why is it so important to you what Olbermann calls himself? I can call him what I want and so can you. I say he's not a pure journalist and so do you. Your WHOLE problem is that he won't acknowledge it? Please get a life!

Jeff, do you ever do anything but come to this blog and post stupid stuff night and day? Oh, I forget, you do whatever it is you do with your daddy's horses the rest of the time.

Posted by: at March 18, 2007 7:48 PM
My father passed away in '91, in case you care. This ranch is mine, horses are mine. Why don't you use a name so I can ignore your ignorant posts from now on, ok? Or are you ashamed?

Brandon: Why is it so important to you what Olbermann calls himself? I can call him what I want and so can you. I say he's not a pure journalist and so do you. Your WHOLE problem is that he won't acknowledge it? Please get a life!

Posted by: at March 18, 2007 8:40 PM

Olbermann is in his late forties so it's doubtful he's "pure". But who knows. That might explain his temprament.

As for Olbermann not acknowledging that he's not the sort of journalist he claims to be--- bingo! You're getting it! Now try broadening that to examining other ...eh...non-pure, news-analyst-type anchors/journalists and how they allow discussion from both sides and certainly allow whoever they're accusing of something to guest on the show and rebut.

As for the "get a life" comment..... you're here....through you aren't an Olbermann defender (oh, they never are...), for the sole purpose of insulting people who criticize as guy you don't care about.

Hypocrite.

MSNBC bills Countdown as the "News Show of Record". They should be forced to post an "editorial" graphic for Keith's entire show.

aap, I asked you if you had a blog in response to you calling Bob and John "hacks". Are you a journalist or just a "hack"? I would guess the latter.

Cecelia:

My purpose here is certainly more pure with less hypocrisy than yours, If you were forced to sit there in front of MSNBC and absorb his commentary, I would certainly undestand your hell bent obsession to get rid of him. But since this is America, and you can watch anything you choose, so I don't get your zeal to suspress KO at all? So I repeat - why not get a life - "hypocite".

Jeff:

>>aap, I asked you if you had a blog in response to you calling Bob and John "hacks". Are you a journalist or just a "hack"? I would guess the latter.

Here it is explained in infantile detail for you,
I hope you can count to 5 (five):

1. No. I don't have a blog.
2. Even if I don't have a blog, this is no excuse for Robert Cox admitting:
3. He's not a journalist.
4. Johnny Bu$hwipe ain't a journalist either.
5. So you are in? You accept to be my Johnny Bu$hwipe on my Evangelico-Reaganist-blog?

Jeff: Arn't your daddy's horses whinneying for some of the personal attention only you can give them? Now don't you go and neglect them now that you've found this blog to get off on!

Cecelia:

My purpose here is certainly more pure with less hypocrisy than yours, If you were forced to sit there in front of MSNBC and absorb his commentary, I would certainly undestand your hell bent obsession to get rid of him. But since this is America, and you can watch anything you choose, so I don't get your zeal to suspress KO at all? So I repeat - why not get a life - "hypocite".

Posted by: at March 18, 2007 9:12 PM

Since I've never claimed to be disinterested in Keith Olbermann and have never portrayed myself as being anything but his critics, how is it hypocritical for me to frequent a site that criticises Olbermann?

Now, were I to go to also go to Olbermann fan boards and tell them to "get a life" that would indeed qualify as hypocritical.

So would screeds about Olbermann critics only disking Olbermann because of his politics, and proclaimations that I care nothing for Olbermann, while I'm going to an Olbermann site in order to point out the "hypocrisy" of hate-filled Olbermann critics via denouncing Fox News, Fox News personalities, rightwingers, etc.

But the clincher is what you're really doing. You're coming to this site because you're just one more nut with some animus against Bob or Johnny.

Helloooo, critic....

Hypocrite.

Jeff: Arn't your daddy's horses whinneying for some of the personal attention only you can give them? Now don't you go and neglect them now that you've found this blog to get off on!

Posted by: at March 18, 2007 9:28 PM

And how many posts and how much time have you spent blogging to Jeff today?

Oh they'd love us if we'd worship Olbermann like they do. They hate us because we call him out for being the liar and hypocrite that he is and they can't stand that. They are such "liberals" that they want to stiffle our freedom of speech.

"And how many posts and how much time have you spent blogging to Jeff today?"

But Cecelia, it' just so much fun! I just can't find deluded idiots like Jeff in real life.

"And how many posts and how much time have you spent blogging to Jeff today?"

But Cecelia, it' just so much fun! I just can't find deluded idiots like Jeff in real life.

Posted by: at March 18, 2007 9:48 PM

Well, I suppose you've been lonely. Everyone needs a soul mate.

>>But Cecelia, it' just so much fun! I just can't find deluded idiots like Jeff in real life.

I know it is hard work, and only FAUX NOISE can do it!

Here's the link to deluded Bush Supporters asking for the Libby pardon:

http://www.foxnews.com/

Oh...wait... IT IS GONE.

Why? LOL!

"Oh they'd love us if we'd worship Olbermann like they do."

Lets see now: what choices do we have here? 1) - worship Olbermann, 2) - hate Olbermann, 3) - be ambivilant about Olbermann 4) - All of the above. You'd be simply amazed to know the number of folks who don't even know or care that he exists. HOW DO THEY LIVE? Correct answer to the question - all of the above.

Now what choices do we have if we like Olbermann? 1) - watch him every night, 2) - watch him occasionally, 3) - don't watch him at all. Correct answer - all of the above.

Now what choices do we have if we hate Olbermann? 1) - watch him every night 2) - don't watch him, 3) - Obsess over him day and night because we just can't atand the thought that he exists at all, or 4) - all of the above. Correct answer (hint - it's not all of the above). I suspect for 99.99999999% of the population, answer 2 would be the logical answer. The other .000000001% of the population, or the busybodies, end up right here!

>>The other .000000001% of the population, or the busybodies, end up right here!

No. You are wrong! wrong! WRONG I TELL YA!!

Based on the BUSHWIPE traffic to this site, and post on Johnny Bu$wipe's, I can prove that the BUSHWIPERY on both sites is HIGHLY RELEVANT!!

THE MBA DOES NOT HAVE ANY POLITICAL LEANINGS!!
IT GLADLY ACCEPTS MONEY FROM THE BUSHWIPE SIDE!!

The other .000000001% of the population, or the busybodies, end up right here!

Posted by: at March 18, 2007 10:01 PM

No, it is .0000005%

The other dimmer half of that percentage sit right here. all day long, writing screed after screed on the unworthiness of the site.

The "dimmer half" of the Olbermann haters "sit here, all day long, writing screed after screed on the unworthiness of this site."

Thanks for clearing that up. These here Olbermann haters are even more confuded than I thought.

THE MBA DOES NOT HAVE ANY POLITICAL LEANINGS!!
IT GLADLY ACCEPTS MONEY FROM THE BUSHWIPE SIDE!!

Posted by: average american patriot at March 18, 2007 10:10 PM

So they'd refuse Sorro's money?...

after screed on the unworthiness of this site."

Thanks for clearing that up"

Posted by: Cecelia at March 18, 2007 10:11 PM

You're welcome. I'm always here to enlightened the dimmer half.

Please, the Olbyloons on this site are just aghast that we don't like their Cult Leader and have been vocal about it. Furthermore, they don't like seeing his lies, omissions and immense bias exposed on a nightly basis. If we were kissing Olby's ample ass on a daily basis like they do, they'd celebrate Cox and Dollar as heroes of the highest order. HYPOCRITES!

>>THE MBA DOES NOT HAVE ANY POLITICAL LEANINGS!!
IT GLADLY ACCEPTS MONEY FROM THE BUSHWIPE SIDE!!

Posted by: average american patriot at March 18, 2007 10:10 PM

So they'd refuse Sorro's money?...

No. Only Bush Supporters, that is Robert Cox, would get his panties in a bunch over :

Soros Fund Management LLC
Form 13F Information Table
Quarter ended December 31, 2006

If the Bush Supporters want to make a blanket statement, here are the figures. Notice:
Title of Class - COM (for common stock), Number of Shares and Fair Market Value,
out of:

Form 13F Information Table Entry(ies) Total: 230

Form 13F Information Table Value Total: $3,070,333 (thousands)-------THAT'S BILLIONS FOR YOU Bush Supporters

Soros Fund Management LLC
Form 13F Information Table
Quarter ended December 31, 2006

Fair Market Shares or SH/
Cusip Value Principal PRN Put/ Shared- Shared- Other
Issuer Title of Class Number (in thousands) Amount Call Sole Defined Other Mngrs** Sole Shared None
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ADAMS RESPIRATORY THERAPEUTI COM 00635P107 $ 67,252 1,647,918 SH X 1 X
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BLUEFLY INC COM 096227103 $62,207 48,599,355 SH X 1 X
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CVS CORP COM 126650100 $67,130 2,171,800 SH X 1 X
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING INC COM 25271C102 $65,079 814,100 SH X 1 X
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HALLIBURTON CO COM 406216101 $62,083 1,999,450 SH X 1 X
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JETBLUE AWYS CORP COM 477143101 $95,219 6,705,587 SH X 1 X
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Of course, THE Bush Supporters, that means Rubbing Cocks, could care less about the remaining $2.5+ BILLION that the FUND has invested in different vehicles.

Read 13F-HR filed on 02/14/2007, for the "Quarter ended December 31, 2006," where THE Bush Supporters are getting your panties tied in a bunch.

I don't think Brandon understands the meaning of this little word "HYPOCRITES!". He keeps misusing it.

Average American Patriot,

I suspect that as long as Sorros didn't attempt to control it, MBA would be more than happy to take any investiment Sorro cared to make in them.

don't think Brandon understands the meaning of this little word "HYPOCRITES!". He keeps misusing it.

Posted by: at March 18, 2007 10:44 PM

No! And here he has your sterling example of spending so much of your ttime at a site about a media person you don't care about, in order for you to point out the hypocrisy of people who waste their time pointing out the hypocrisy of someone else.

CC:

>I suspect that as long as Sorros didn't attempt to control it, MBA would be more than happy to take any investiment Sorro cared to make in them.

This is where the Bushwipe conspiracy (again, a non-story) starts.

George Soros, or the FUND, is FAR from controlling Halliburton.

To an analyst/trader from the FUND, Halliburton seemed right for a good trade.

-Clue in Jim Cramer -

To paraphrase:
Money talks. Bush Supporters walk.

To paraphrase:
Money talks. Bush Supporters walk.

Posted by: average american patriot at March 18, 2007 10:59 PM

Average American Patriot balks.

I'm not making a point about Halliburton, I'm pointing out that the MBA would likely be glad to take the money from Sorros, or anyone on the left who didn't try to control them.

Oh but Cecelia, I DO care about his show. I just don't worship him like you people keep claiming we do. I am also a little bit offended that there are people out there dedicating themselves to taking down someone I like just simply because they don't, yet are never forced to watch themselves. There's no hypocrisy on my part. I'm actually defending my own turf.

It is very clear to me that this site is nothing but a smear machine litersally obsessed with a controversial TV commentator to a degree that FAR exceeds the impact of the particular commentator in question...and it then GREATLY exagerates the claimed "slights, lies, and distortions" of that commentator. This is what happens when you examine every word and facial expression by someone with a magnifying glass while specifically looking for faults. Your going to find some every time, both real and percieved.

In short this site has no noble purpose, and has itself become something far worse than the "insult to journalism" it claims to be addressing.

I won't be back, so fire away at me if anyone want to, but I won't be around to read anything you might have to say in response to this post. My only real purpose in making this post is to address any speculation in advance that anyone might have as to why I don't post here anymore.

Adios everyone!

Posted by: Mike at March 16, 2007 10:01 AM
Remember this, mikey?

He's still here, he just can't leave. Only now, he is to cowardly to post a name!

I hope jeff keeps cuttin and pastin that last post from "Mike". It's a good one It's also pretty cute the way he keeps calling all these posters 'mikey".

It's also SOOO cute the way he thinks posting "JEFF" on this blog somehow makes him "brave". Kind of similar to the way he thinks that really cute little ribbon he's got stuck on his car means he's a supportin the troops.

Hey Jeff, "mikeys" out there - and he's gonna get ya! He could be anywhere. Ya can't be too carefull!

I'm no stock broker/expert, but, I don't ever remember being asked what my political affiliation was when buying or selling any stock.....

Oh but Cecelia, I DO care about his show. I just don't worship him like you people keep claiming we do. I am also a little bit offended that there are people out there dedicating themselves to taking down someone I like just simply because they don't, yet are never forced to watch themselves. There's no hypocrisy on my part. I'm actually defending my own turf.

Posted by: at March 18, 2007 11:05 PM

Then you obviously have no grasp on the definition of hypocrisy.

It is not hypocrisy to criticise Olbermann or to want him to conform to standards, such as allowing rebuttal from those he accuses, allowing other sides of an argument to be aired, or to be taken off the air.

The argument that critics don't HAVE to watch the show and should therefore not agitate against it, is no more an argument about "hypocrisy" than the man and the moon.

Gays didn't HAVE to listen to Dr. Laura's program but they demanded that her sponsors drop her for what she said. Keith Olbermann didn't HAVE to watch ABCs 9/11 series, but he crusaded that it not be aired. Olbermann doesn't HAVE to watch Glenn Beck, but he TWICE dedicated a segment of Countdown to asking that CNN not give Beck a show.

Sorry, you don't care for Olbermann Watch or the people here, but you're not liking someone's opinion or motive is not the definition of hypocrisy.

Physician heal thyself.

Jeff/Cecelia/Redwolf,
Again your Klan induced hatefullness shows again. A true spawn of an evil inbred Kulture!

CC:

>>I'm not making a point about Halliburton, I'm pointing out that the MBA would likely be glad to take the money from Sorros, or anyone on the left who didn't try to control them.

You are correct.

And I'm making the point that a good capitalist,
Mr. Robert Cox or Halliburton, will accept the investment of any willing participant.
As long as cash is presented as a token of good will.

But I wonder why a recognized blog like the HUFFO's don't belong to Robert Sucks_Cocks_Association?

Jeff/Cecelia/Redwolf,
Again your Klan induced hatefullness shows again. A true spawn of an evil inbred Kulture!

Posted by: Coward Watch at March 18, 2007 11:21 PM

Aaaahhh.... we love us some Coward Watch aka Kulture of the Klown...

average american patriot /Redwolf,
Deception is the way of nthe Klan. Your inbred forefathers hid under robes. ou try posting as a liberal but your hateful rants exposes you Klan mind.
Redwolf, I will keep exposing you vile Klan Creature!

You are correct.

And I'm making the point that a good capitalist,
Mr. Robert Cox or Halliburton, will accept the investment of any willing participant.
As long as cash is presented as a token of good will.

But I wonder why a recognized blog like the HUFFO's don't belong to Robert Sucks_Cocks_Association?

Posted by: average american patriot at March 18, 2007 11:23 PM

Perhaps it's the "token of good will" part that's in question...

Average American Patriot, you can't' have it both ways. You can't say that Bob Cox is hypocritical for pointing out that Sorros is investing heavily in a corporation he has excoriated, while ignoring the fact that "good capitalist" Sorros, like Cheney, certainly doesn't mind Halliburton profits either.

But I wonder why a recognized blog like the HUFFO's don't belong to Robert Sucks_Cocks_Association?

Posted by: average american patriot at March 18, 2007 11:23 PM

From what I've seen on their site it seems that Jeff Jarvis and Oliver Willis' blog are members and they aren't exactly Freepers...

Perhaps you should wait and see.

ouch!

I've been exposed.

While the gorgeous fruits of BUSHWIPERY stand for all the world to see.

Tell me again, Bush Supporters.

Found any WMDs yet?

LOL

"soros, like Cheney, certainly doesn't mind Haliburton profits either"

Maybe not, but one caused the national tragedy and sigrace Haliburton is profiting from, and the other did not.

ouch!

I've been exposed.

While the gorgeous fruits of BUSHWIPERY stand for all the world to see.

Tell me again, Bush Supporters.

Found any WMDs yet?

LOL

Posted by: average american patriot at March 18, 2007 11:33 PM

Money talks... Average American patriot squawks...

soros, like Cheney, certainly doesn't mind Haliburton profits either"

Maybe not, but one caused the national tragedy and sigrace Haliburton is profiting from, and the other did not.

Posted by: at March 18, 2007 11:37 PM

Right. No problem with profitting from what Sorros would label similarly as a "national tragedy and disgrace" as long as he didn't start it...

Maybe not, but one caused the national tragedy and sigrace Haliburton is profiting from, and the other did not.

Posted by: at March 18, 2007 11:37 PM
Who brought clinton into this argument? He caused a nat'l tragedy, 9/11.

CC:

>>Average American Patriot, you can't' have it both ways. You can't say that Bob Cox is hypocritical for pointing out that Sorros is investing heavily in a corporation he has excoriated, while ignoring the fact that "good capitalist" Sorros, like Cheney, certainly doesn't mind Halliburton profits either.

Uh...oh... no.

CC, you are parroting the BUSHWIPE line of "YOU ARE EITHER WITH US OR AGAINST US"

And I'm mocking the clairvoyance skills of Bob Sucks_Cox.

I, You, and Bob don't know why a FUND worth 3 BILLION, take notice, not Soros, would invest 62 million to make a measly 1 million,
which could easily go the other way.
Would Bob Sucks-Cox have reported Soros "losing"
$1 million on his Halliburton trade.

No.
It is within the trading range.

BIG FUGGING DEAL.

I can't wait for Bob sucks_Cox, the FOREX expert, answer.

"who brought Clinton into this argument? He caused a nat'l tragedy, 9/11"

Sure he did Jeff. And he shouldn't have occupied Iraq like he did either, leaving this whopping big mess for Bush to clean up.

Stop picking on Keith! So what if he's pandering to Soros? Their honesty isn't an issue when speaking "truth to power". The ends ALWAYs justify the means! Keith is a terrific journalist and I would be honored if he would stick his wenis deep inside me while whispering truth to power in my ear as he tears apart the delicate tissue of my anal cavity. Stop all war NOW!

3/19/2007 5:50:43 AM
Tramadol

3/19/2007 5:51:25 AM
Tramadol

It would be helpful for someone to have a clue about how Soro's funds operate before claiming that a "trader" did a trade in HAL because it looked like a good one.

Hey Robert or J$,

You think KO or MSNBC will be making an offer for this site?

NY TIMES March 19, 2007
A Division of NBC Buys Out One of Its Harshest Online Critics

By MARIA ASPAN

In a review of “Top Design,” the reality show on Bravo Networks, a staff writer for the Web site Televisionwithoutpity.com mused that in the future, the show would be “just another filthy memory whose outcome I’ve long since forgotten.”

He can thank his new employers for the memories. Bravo, a division of NBC Universal, announced its acquisition of Television Without Pity on Tuesday. The television review Web site joins the network’s other online outlets, including the broadband channels BrilliantButCancelled.com, OUTzoneTV.com and getTRIO.com.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/19/business/media/19pity.html?ei=5090&en=1eaa129b17861dc3&ex=1331956800&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&pagewanted=print

I think it's fair to say, after reading the leftwingism that's corrupted the internet - and especially this site - that liberals should get together and all move to Antarctica and leave their computers behind.

A country without liberals is called a success!

"leftwingism"?

Written by a regular Eisnstein.

Your rite, Matt! If we could just send all them liberals down to Antartica then theyd freeze to death even if we let em have there computers how could they use em with shivering fingers? If America just hadn'ta had to dal with all them liberal cowards weda already won Iraq and be half way won in Iran by now. We needa just shut up and let President Bush and God do whats right and just stop listening to thoem traitors who don't even know whats best.

Written by a regular Eisnstein.

Posted by: at March 19, 2007 11:26 AM
written by a regular closet case that never served, even though he said he did.

Last night they showed 911 stuff on Tv again and it made me mad at Saddam Hussein all over again. We didn't kill him slow enuph . He shoulda been made to pay more for raming those planes nto our towers like that. We just gottsa beat them Muslims over there in Iraq so they can't ever do to us agin what they did on 911.

If that traitor Keith Ulbermahn stays on TV, he's just gonna go and make more liberals and make it harder for President Bush. If we could jus make them liberals to watch Hannitty instead of Ulbermann for a couple of weeks, they'd realize how brainwashed theyve been and then we could put Ulbermann back on and nobdody would watch him anymore anyway.

Have you seen his ratings? It's not like anyone is really watching him now as it is!

"it's not like anyone is really watching him now as it is".

It's just Brandon, calling himself a nobody.

Have you seen his ratings? It's not like anyone is really watching him now as it is!

Posted by: Brandon at March 19, 2007 1:10 PM

It's better to have 400,000 viewers with a triple diget IQ than 2000,000 with a single diget. One would need a single diget IQ to watch FOX.

It's better to have 400,000 viewers with a triple diget IQ than 2000,000 with a single diget. One would need a single diget IQ to watch FOX.

Posted by: at March 19, 2007 1:32 PM
Is that why Fox News holds the top 14 of 15 spots? There must be a lot of single digit iq's out there. Rush-#1, Hannity-#2, Savage-#3, Error America-Bankrupt. Can you explain these ratings?

Gee, I wonder who jimbo is..........unbelievable.

"It's better to have 400,000 viewers with a triple diget IQ than 2000,000 with a single diget. One would need a single diget IQ to watch FOX."

Wait, you complain about war profiteers and then you watch a show that is funded by a company that makes fighter jet engines, with a host who takes money from a guy who makes millions off Halliburton stock. I think it would take a single digit IQ to watch a show against a war that it makes its money off of war.
" Tonight on Count Down with Keith Olbermann, when will this bloody war end? Sponsored by GE, we make shock and awe possible and by Halliburton, enjoy are new location in Du Bi."
P.S. You might want to spell digit correctly before you talk about low IQ’s.

President Bush should arrest traitor Keith Ulbermahn and send him to quantanimo. A little bit of waterbording here and there will straighten him rite out. Also, put him in a cell with one of them radicals who want to kill him and he'l be singin a diferent tune when he comes back!

"GE, we make shock and awe possible"

Making "Shock and awe" possible, and using that ability irresponsibly are two totally different things. Just because you have a gun doesn't mean it's a good idea to shoot your neighbor over his barking dog. Just because you were stupid enough to shoot your neighbor over his bothersome dog doesn't mean you can blame Smith & Wesson for your own stupidity.

We are winning defeating the American and Zionist scums! Keith Olbermann is a hero to us in the Jihad. He is supporting the justice of our cause!

P.S. You might want to spell digit correctly before you talk about low IQ’s.

Posted by: The Factor at March 19, 2007 2:03 PM

That's what I get for trying to watch FOX a lowered IQ.

Making "Shock and awe" possible, and using that ability irresponsibly are two totally different things. Just because you have a gun doesn't mean it's a good idea to shoot your neighbor over his barking dog. Just because you were stupid enough to shoot your neighbor over his bothersome dog doesn't mean you can blame Smith & Wesson for your own stupidity.

This is a first, a liberal not blaming the gun for gun violence. I guess when you are defending Keith Olbermann, you will compromise any of your principals.

R Cox, thanks for the links about VP Cheney's Halliburton stock options.

I knew he had completely divested from Hallibuton but thought he still had deferred stock options. I just heard recently someone declaring as fact that he still had a financial interest in Halliburton because of the options.

VP Cheney has as much interest in Halliburton as I do, which is absolutely NONE.

No doubt the comments will be flooding in shortly from all those folks who have been accusing the VP of war proffiteering with Halliburton admitting that they were misinformed.

Grammie

"This is a first, a liberal not blaming the gun for gun violence"

this particular liberal has never blamed guns for anything, so I certainly haven't "compromised" anything. You people need to get your stereotypes straight. The talking point stereotypes apply to your side far more than they do to our side, where most of us actually have a brain and therefore think for ourselves.

Olbermann sleeps with 16 year old girls. There are rumors that he picks up 16 year old and has threesomes with them and Katie. His Cialis helps his limpness performs!

"where most of us actually have a brain and therefore think for ourselves. "

Bless you on your wisdom. It's good to know that there are Americans that see justice in our cause for Jihad!

Grammie: "VP Cheney has as much interest in Haliburton as I do, which is absolutely NONE."

If you don't think he has retained personal relationships and kept a soft spot for his old company, and if you don't believe he has acted favorably towards his former (and probably future) company, then you're a bigger nitwit than I thought you were.
grandma!

Gammie,
Cheny is an infidel. When the our Leftist allies take power in America he will be handed over to the Jihadi. We will cut his head off!
In'shallah!

"where most of us actually have a brain and therefore think for ourselves.
Posted by: at March 19, 2007 3:17 PM"

If that were true, surely OW would have at least one liberal with a think for himself brain.

Grammie

Olbermann does think with his brain.
He uses cialis since he has a limp dick!

Grammie: "If that were true, surely would have at least one liberal with a think for himself brain."

It really doesn't take much of a brain to deal with the half witted Olbermann basher's on this site, so we like to "tie half our brain's behind our back, just to make it fair". Grandma!

" Grandma!". No dear, I don't think I am your grandma.

If that is the case, perhaps you should switch halves and use the functioning side. Assuming that there is one.

Grammie

"no dear, I don't think I am your grandma."

You mean you arn't sure Grandma?

Another humiliating night for Odormoronn and his gameshow Meltdown - FOURTH place out of FIVE. Of course, had MSDNC and Odormoronn not pleaded with CNBC to move the Deal or No Deal rerun out of Odormoronn's time slot, Odormoronn would have suffered and even more humiliating FIFTH place out of FIVE. BTW, in the key, critical, all-important, much-loved demo, Glenn Beck was only 3,000 behind Odormoronn. Now, can we expect to see dozens of fawning tributes to Beck in dozens of "news"papers across the country?

Thursday, March 15, 2007

8PM - P2+ (25-54)
O'Reilly Factor - 2,101,000 viewers (452,000)
Paula Zahn - 489,000 viewers (176,000)
Countdown w/ Olbermann - 692,000 viewers (167,000)
Fast Money - 186,000 viewers (51,000)
Nancy Grace - 915,000 viewers (300,000)

9 PM - P2+ (25-54)

Deal or No Deal - 918,000 viewers (252,000)
Glenn Beck - 464,000 viewers (164,000)

No dear, meaning that I identify myself and you are anonymous. Since you don't identify yourself I can't be 100% certain that I am not your grandma.

You, however, have the advantage of knowing both my name and your own name. You SHOULD know.

Perhaps you should try switching sides. The side you are using is obviously a bit lacking in critical thinking skills.

Grammie

But Grandma, I would think you really should know whether there is a possibility you have a long lost grandchild? I thought about "switching sides", but your side is wrong, and I sorta like to be on the side of "right", not to be confused with "The Right".

This is a first, a liberal not blaming the gun for gun violence. I guess when you are defending Keith Olbermann, you will compromise any of your principals.

Posted by: The Factor at March 19, 2007 3:09 PM

All liberals are not anti gun or blame the gun for gun violence. Just as not all republicans are brainwashed warmongers.

No dear, no possibility of lost grandchildren.

You are the only one in this foolish discussion who would know for sure because you are the only one in a position to know the pertinent facts, ie the names of both parties.

I realize following several paragraphs can be difficult for the thinking challenged, but you really should make an effort when the discussion you started is that only half a brain is required by you and like minded others to prevail here at OW.

It is obvious that my suspicion is true. Neither side of your brain is functioning well, whether individually or together.

Grammie

The problem for "factor" is he thinks he knows how "liberals think", because his leaders keep telling him they know all about how "liberals think". Problem is, they don't know jack about "liberals".

But Grandma, I would think you really should know whether there is a possibility you have a long lost grandchild? I thought about "switching sides", but your side is wrong, and I sorta like to be on the side of "right", not to be confused with "The Right".

Posted by: at March 19, 2007 4:05 PM

If watching Fox News makes you loose IQ points you certainly need to stop. You don't have any to spare. Grammie was suggesting you switch to whatever side of your brain that's operational enough to have at least powered up your bodily functions, rather than asking you to come anywhere near us or "our side"....

Grammie: "You are the only one in this foolish discussion who would know for sure"

When Grandma, have there ever been anything but foolish discussions on this site? The quality of discussions have gone from very bad to pathetic since the famous shut - down.

But Cecelia, I like my version of Grammie's side switch suggestion, because that way, I got to point out which side is actually "right", not that this is really necessary these days.

The problem for "factor" is he thinks he knows how "liberals think", because his leaders keep telling him they know all about how "liberals think". Problem is, they don't know jack about "liberals".

Posted by: at March 19, 2007 4:24 PM

I'd go further than that. I have liberal friends and family. I wouldn't group you in with them either, anymore than I'd invite Kulture of the Klown to dinner with them.

You're just a putz with control issues, who likely carries some grudge towards Bob or Johnny, so you go trolling on their website.

Even channel surfing past FOX will give you FOX dementia. I just lost my car keys! Went into my neighbors house and banged his wife. That's, it I'm suing FOX. THERE SHOULD HAVE BEEN A WARNING ON THE SCREEN.

But Cecelia, I like my version of Grammie's side switch suggestion, because that way, I got to point out which side is actually "right", not that this is really necessary these days.

Posted by: at March 19, 2007 4:31 PM

So we'll add "desparate and needy" to "not very bright" on your list of personal characteristics.

Even channel surfing past FOX will give you FOX dementia. I just lost my car keys! Went into my neighbors house and banged his wife. That's, it I'm suing FOX. THERE SHOULD HAVE BEEN A WARNING ON THE SCREEN.

Posted by: at March 19, 2007 4:34 PM

Nah.... even if Fox hired a 12 year old to defend them, they'd have no difficulty proving it's a pre-existing condition...

Nah.... even if Fox hired a 12 year old to defend them, they'd have no difficulty proving it's a pre-existing condition...

Posted by: Cecelia at March 19, 2007 4:39 PM

I'll just leave it to the court to decide. I'll get that great constipaional lawyer, Levin to represent me.

I'll just leave it to the court to decide. I'll get that great constipaional lawyer, Levin to represent me.

Posted by: at March 19, 2007 4:43 PM

You don't need "great", you'd need a magician.

"you're just a putz with control issues, who likely carries some grudge towards Bob or Johnny, so you go trolling on their web site"

Not that "Bob or Johnny" are carrying a grudge against anybody or anything like that?

Cecelia, if he's not careful about avoiding Fox his IQ may well be the first to dip into negative numbers.

I would suggest Bill Clinton to represent him, but wasn't he disbarred.

Grammie

"you're just a putz with control issues, who likely carries some grudge towards Bob or Johnny, so you go trolling on their web site"

Not that "Bob or Johnny" are carrying a grudge against anybody or anything like that?

Posted by: at March 19, 2007 4:47 PM

Perhaps you could channel your animus in a less childish manner by getting your own blog instead of stalking them.

I disagree that watching Fox lowers IQ numbers, and totally agree with Cecelia that any such claim would have to be a pre-existing condition. Anybody with half a brain who accidently turns to Fox will recognize within a couple of minutes that they are on a hack channel.

I admit I have certainly felt much more stupid after forcing myself to view Fox, but that is quickly rectified by catching up on some real news.

"Perhaps you could channel your animous in a less childish manner by getting your own blog instead of stalking them."

Eureka! "Stalking" - you hit the nail on the head! That is EXACTLY what Bob and J$ are doing with this web site.

I admit I have certainly felt much more stupid after forcing myself to view Fox, but that is quickly rectified by catching up on some real news.

Posted by: at March 19, 2007 4:53 PM

Nope. If you were really dealing in reality you'd not only feel much more stupid than you've ever imagined you were, you'd KNOW that you indeed ARE.

I disagree that watching Fox lowers IQ numbers, and totally agree with Cecelia that any such claim would have to be a pre-existing condition. Anybody with half a brain who accidently turns to Fox will recognize within a couple of minutes that they are on a hack channel.

I admit I have certainly felt much more stupid after forcing myself to view Fox, but that is quickly rectified by catching up on some real news.

Posted by: at March 19, 2007 4:53 PM

DITTOS! DITTOS!

Eureka! "Stalking" - you hit the nail on the head! That is EXACTLY what Bob and J$ are doing with this web site.

Posted by: at March 19, 2007 4:57 PM

Yet another illogical inane case you'd lose.

I would suggest Bill Clinton to represent him, but wasn't he disbarred.

Grammie

Posted by: Janet Hawkins at March 19, 2007 4:47 PM

Like Bill needs a lawyers license. He's making $$$$$ anyway.

disagree that watching Fox lowers IQ numbers, and totally agree with Cecelia that any such claim would have to be a pre-existing condition. Anybody with half a brain who accidently turns to Fox will recognize within a couple of minutes that they are on a hack channel.

I admit I have certainly felt much more stupid after forcing myself to view Fox, but that is quickly rectified by catching up on some real news.

Posted by: at March 19, 2007 4:53 PM

DITTOS! DITTOS!

Posted by: at March 19, 2007 4:58 PM
This person definately has the "pre-exhisting" condition of a 0 iq.

"Yet another illogical court case you'd lose"

I'm sure your right what with all the Fox, er I mean right wing money that is behind this web site.

"this person definately has the "pre-existing" condition of a 0 iq."

Jeff, your no fun at all to laugh WITH, just to laugh AT. Cecelia and Grammie at least are pretty clever. Trust me Jeff, you are not.

"Yet another illogical court case you'd lose"

I'm sure your right what with all the Fox, er I mean right wing money that is behind this web site.

Posted by: at March 19, 2007 5:06 PM

LIke someone said.... who needs a law license ....and who needs $$$$$$$$...when there's no case....

We are winning defeating the American and Zionist scums! Keith Olbermann is a hero to us in the Jihad. He is supporting the justice of our cause!

Posted by: Jamal at March 19, 2007 3:00 PM
Tell us something we don't already know.

. Trust me Jeff, you are not.

Posted by: at March 19, 2007 5:09 PM

You aren't either but we just enjoy your handing us all the straight lines.

Sure, its Fox News that is causing you to lose brain cells. It couldn't be the bong hits you are doing next to the leaky furnace in your mom's basement.

"you arn't either but we enjoy your handing us all the straight lines."

I think it's wonderfull the way you leap to the rescue of the less mentally endowed on your "team". After all, the rule in politics these days sems to be "defend you own".

It really doesn't take much of a brain to deal with the half witted Olbermann basher's on this site, so we like to "tie half our brain's behind our back, just to make it fair". Grandma!

Posted by: at March 19, 2007 3:32 PM
Sounds like we an olbyloon that listens to and steals lines from Rush, is that allowed on "planetolby?"

Jeff you infidel,
We have the support of not just the great Olbermann(Peace be upon him), we have support of over 70% of the American Population. Your media supports the just cause of Jihad.
We are winning, you are losing.
If brother Ahmadinejad(Peace be upon him)
ran for President, he would win!
When we conquer this nation with the blessing of most of the population, eveil Christians and Jews will be rounded and exterminated. Our Leftist allies will cooperate with the Caliphate!

"Sure, it's Fox News that is causing you to lose brain cells. It couldn't be the bong hits you are doing next to the leaky furnace in your mom's basement."

Ha, ha, ha, ha, Oh Factor, stop! You're ha, ha ha, killing us with your clever humor. LOL!

"When we conquer this nation"

Well Jamal. you've already conquered Jeff's brain, because it remains paralyzed with irrational fear of Islamofacism.

"you arn't either but we enjoy your handing us all the straight lines."

I think it's wonderfull the way you leap to the rescue of the less mentally endowed on your "team". After all, the rule in politics these days sems to be "defend you own".

Posted by: at March 19, 2007 5:19 PM

Oh yeah.... it's pure altruism rather than merely batting you around....

"Sounds like we an that listens to and steals lines from Rush, is that allowed on "planetolby"."

It's called "parody" Jeff. I'm sure Cecelia and Grammie understood that, but it's no surprise that you didn't.

"Well Jamal. you've already conquered Jeff's brain, because it remains paralyzed with irrational fear of Islamofacism. "

My friend, the armies of Jihad are triumphant! There were dark times I even though we couldn't win. But you on the Left have helped our side by defending our cause and demoralizing the eveil Americans. We are on the verge of a historic victory. After we liberate Iraq and Afghanistan, we destroy the Zionist entity. Then we will conquesr Europe. There are already Jihadists in this nation. With your assistance the flag of Islam will fly over the White House!

Like Bill needs a lawyers license. He's making $$$$$ anyway.

Posted by: at March 19, 2007 5:02 PM
A true clinton apologist. Someone who would trade a few bucks for morals or integrity=liberal.

"Oh yeah...it's pure altruism rather than merely batting you around..."

And I can appreciate your selfless altruistic spirit, but you do realize that your "team" is losing points with Jeff on it?

"A true clinton apologist. Someone who would trade a few bucks for morals ot integrity"

A perfect description of almost every Republican I can think of these days, starting with the chimp in the White House.

"Oh yeah...it's pure altruism rather than merely batting you around..."

And I can appreciate your selfless altruistic spirit, but you do realize that your "team" is losing points with Jeff on it?

Posted by: at March 19, 2007 5:33 PM

You can't win even if do pretend to be the referee.

"A perfect description of almost every Republican I can think of these days, starting with the chimp in the White House."

Agreed, as a Zionist he's the son of Monkeys! We are winning, the Jihad is victorious!

A perfect description of almost every Republican I can think of these days, starting with the chimp in the White House.

Posted by: at March 19, 2007 5:35 PM

Just think, just yesterday Anon was declaring that were plenty of smart republicans who did good things for the country.... when it suited his/her purpose in arguing that Jeff hated all opponents.

How time flies...

I REST MY CASE, YOU WINGNUTS DON'T EVEN REALIZE SOMEONE HAVING A LITTLE FUN ON THIS SITE. YOU START DEFENDING THE PUKE FEST ON FOX. LIKE SOMEONE WAS GOING TO FILE A SUIT AGAINST FOX. IT'S WAS JUST A TEST AS TO THE CHECK THE RESPONSES. ONLY TWO POSTERS REALIZED THIS WAS A TOTAL JOKE!

"just yesterday Anon was declaring that were plenty of smart republicans who did good things for the country"

Yeah, but that was that OTHER anon.

5:53: Please stop shouting!

"just yesterday Anon was declaring that were plenty of smart republicans who did good things for the country"

Yeah, but that was that OTHER anon.

Posted by: at March 19, 2007 5:55 PM

Right. You don't get a name then you get all the anon crap attributed to you. Plain and simple. Particularly when you are most certainly the anon who wrote it.

"particularly when you are most certainly the anon who wrote it"

Congrats, you've joined a rather exclusive club of claivoyants with Coward Watch and Jeff. Now do I get credited with all the GOOD "anon crap", along with the bad?

particularly when you are most certainly the anon who wrote it"

Congrats, you've joined a rather exclusive club of claivoyants with Coward Watch and Jeff. Now do I get credited with all the GOOD "anon crap", along with the bad?

Posted by: at March 19, 2007 6:11 PM

What "good"?
It's an occupational hazard for anonymous' everwhere.

Well, you have some anons on your side too.

Just think, just yesterday Anon was declaring that were plenty of smart republicans who did good things for the country.... when it suited his/her purpose in arguing that Jeff hated all opponents.

How time flies...

Posted by: Cecelia at March 19, 2007 5:43 PM
Yes, he was the same "anon". Now the same "anon" is grouping me with coward watch, a truly confused "anon". The same "anon" that would trade a few bucks for morals and integrity. But, you have to have one of the 3 to make a trade of which "anon" clearly doesn't. The same "anon" who said "who needs a lawyer when you have $" and then used my analyzation of his "comment" to say it "sounded like all republicans". lmao.

What "good"?
It's an occupational hazard for anonymous' everwhere.

Posted by: Cecelia at March 19, 2007 6:20 PM
Please, show one "good" comment you made on this whole blog, anon.

"Agreed, as a Zionist he's the son of Monkeys! We are winning, the Jihad is victorious!" Jamal

Jamal, would you like to give the opening prayer at the Democratic National Convention? You seem to represent the type of multicultural religous ideals that fit into the democrat party.

Everybody knows it was THE VAST RIGHT-WING CONSPIRACY in conjunction with the JEWISH LOBBY acting on orders given by THE ILLUMINATTI and THE ROTHSCHILDS that bought those 2 million stocks and simply filled in Soros' name on the certificate. I mean, come on, that's common knowledge. In no way could Soros' hypocrisy play a role in this!

You are totaly wrong. It was Skull and Bones and the Free Masons who filled out the stock certificates in Soros name. They also used alien mind control to convince people that 9/11 occured. George Bush is a half alien half Free Mason child. He using Halibuton to go more aliens.

>AND CHANEY MAKES ABOUT 100 M A YEAR ON HALLIBURTON. WHAT'S YOU POINT, IDIOT!

Um...guess again:

http://www.factcheck.org/article261.html

Now that's what I call an "inconvenient truth." :-O