Mr Cox, I had just read The Twisted Tale of M, or perhaps it should be The Tale of the Twisted M, yesterday.

Compared to that major league loonacy this is almost an amusing sidelight.

Grammie

"Meanwhile, the blogger over at Christopher Hitchens Watch seems to have linked to the site after it was taken down (briefly). Why would anyone link to a blog that was down unless they knew it was coming back up?"

We lefties know all and see all.

xxx

S

"Mr Cox, I had just read The Twisted Tale of M, or perhaps it should be The Tale of the Twisted M, yesterday."

Funny, how the only time that name comes up is when Mr. Cox brings it up.

Even more funny is that Bob has managed to get himself into yet another "twisted tale' with an entirely different person. Makes one wonder if perhaps Bob is the problem after all.

Feel free to check it out for yourself (link below). While M rode off into the sunset never to be heard from again, Mr. Cox's new victim has created a blog in order to fight back: http://coxstuff.blogspot.com/

And, gee, guess where I found this little story about Mr. Cox and he new vicitim? Yep, you guessed it: Watching OlbermannWatch

Perhaps Mr. Cox was a little quick to jump to conclusions and spread rumors (as is usually the case) about who he thinks is associated with WOW.

Whose on first? Sounds like they can't even figure out who's playing on what team!

Calling Cox to Task, your first statement: "Funny, how the only time that name comes up is when Mr. Cox brings it up.", my dear, is completely wrong, and perhaps deliberately so? I found the link here:

-------------------------------
http://watchingolbermannwatch.blogspot.com/
search/label/OlbermannWatch

Tuesday, February 6, 2007
Bob Cox's History of Online Terrorism, Example #3

The mother of all examples of irresponsible blogging.

The following is a comment Bob Cox ........
Posted by the watcher at 8:14 AM

Labels: OlbermannWatch

------------------------
I clicked on this:

"In a discussion thread on OlbermannWatch"

Voila! there was The Tale of the Twisted M, or if you prefer, The Twisted Tale of M.

If I may be so familiar, may I call you Twisty? I realise that I am up in years, but surely Feb 6, 2007 is still earlier then March 10, 2007.

Dear Twisty, how kind of you to respond so promptly. Proper manners are so lacking in the young of today!

Ta Ta,

Grammie

"If I may be so familiar, may I call you Twisty?"

You may, so long as you're not attempting to suggest that I am "M."

"Dear Twisty, how kind of you to respond so promptly."

Your welcome, though I was hardly responding to you...only referencing what you had said.

"Proper manners are so lacking in the young of today!"

Ah, well I suppose I should confess....I'm not as young as you may have thought. And, yes, I do have manners.

Twisty, you claim you were NOT adressing me. What else can one think when you cut and paste from my post, and then proceed to answer me.

And, you STILL have not addressed the fact that I learned the Tale of the Twisted M from WatchingOlbermanWatch not from any other source. That puts the lie to your assertion.

And such quick responses on a very quiesenent site. What could explain that? Hmm, I wonder.

Grammie

"Twisty, you claim you were NOT adressing me. What else can one think when you cut and paste from my post, and then proceed to answer me.

And, you STILL have not addressed the fact that I learned the Tale of the Twisted M from WatchingOlbermanWatch not from any other source. That puts the lie to your assertion."

Hmm, where are my manners, let me be more clear. Again, I was not addressing you, I was referencing something you had said....which of course had itself referenced Bob's raising the name of M. I was simply commenting on the situation: "Funny, how the only time that name comes up is when Mr. Cox brings it up."

So let me be more clear again, I wasn't attacking you or even addressing you. What I meant, specifically, was that name only comes up on this site becuase Bob continues to bring it up. Case in point, had Bob not brought it up, you probably wouldn't have either; which was my point to begin with.

"And such quick responses on a very quiesenent site. What could explain that? Hmm, I wonder."

Hmmm, a new mystery arises: There's Watchers Watching OlbermannWatch!!!! Who could it/they be?

On the other hand, perhaps I was just bored and checked back to see if you had responded. Seriously, not everything is a conspiracy.

Good night Grammie. Get some sleep.

Tomorrow is a new day and perhaps we can discover who's watching OlbermannWatch!

Dear me Grammie, what in the world does 'quiesenent' mean, or did you possibly have 'quiescent' in mind?

"Dear me Grammie, what in the world does 'quiesenent' mean, or did you possibly have 'quiescent' in mind?"

Dear lord, I hope not, Bob's head might explode.

Maybe dear Grammie meant secernent? Yes, secernent, that seems to fit Mr. Cox and this place perfectly.

Troll, troll, troll your crap gently down the web. Merrily, merrily, merrily trolls are but a***oles..

Grammie

Janet, you sure know how to kill a thread. I just know you are more clever than that.