Now Children don't I hear your mother calling? Does she know what your are doing in the basement?

Robert, this was a comment from another website, Could you post some that footage, Great Thanks:

"When Keith and Chris went over to the crowd to talk to a few people, it was obvious Keith was uncomfortable. He was OK as long as Chris had the mic, but when he turned it over to Keith, he got scared. He said, "Don't leave me, Chris! We've still got a minute left." "

I forgot to mention that this happened near the very end the post-debate coverage.

Keith Olbermann interact with Common people?

surely you gest?

And don't call me Shirley!

Gee When MSNBC has the Republican Debate out in Cali will the great Edward R. Moron show up to confront Rudy on these charges?

Well, I'm looking out my window but I don't see any pigs with wings.

If Chris Matthews had a chance, he would dump MSNBC so fast it would make heads spin. He would probably go for a brand new news channel that would offer first, if he would.

As for Keith Olbermann, he would have to stay, because you only get so lucky to have a channel that would accept so much of his nonsense and spinning as well as MSNBC would. Keith Olbermann is the grandmaster of lying.

Politics from a failed sports hack?
And Chris Matthews won't cover his back
Keith's on live tonight?
Mister Deer in Headlight
Olby looks like he's been smoking crack

keith is not a man of the people. His fans like to spin this elaborate fantasies about how he's a "down-to-earth" guy but I think it was obvious that he didn't want to mingle with the crowd, which by the way, was mostly made up of African Americans. Maybe MSNBC fired the wrong racist?

Keith doesn't like to mingle?

How dare he ( not)!

Thanks for clarifying what's really important in this country of ours.

idiots...one and all !

idiots...one and all !

Posted by: at April 27, 2007 11:50 PM

Speak for yourself...

No Cecilia..I'm speaking of YOU, and brandon and Jeffrey and Little Freaky and Cee etc.
All the Kool Aid drinkers who HAVE to know what's going on( by now) but just can't bring yourselves to admit it.

No Cecilia..I'm speaking of YOU, and brandon and Jeffrey and Little Freaky and Cee etc.
All the Kool Aid drinkers who HAVE to know what's going on( by now) but just can't bring yourselves to admit it.

Posted by: at April 28, 2007 12:01 AM

Thanks for the clarification.

Since you had said "idiots...one and all", I thought that this must include you too, and so I credited you with having a modicum of insight...

There you go again..Cecelia...

The idiots ARE the ones with blinders on to what is happening in this country but continue to ignore it.

You know EXACTLY what I meant...but your schtick is playing word games.

lil mikey has went underground, again, how cute.

That was MY post Royala--hole.

Your record of being wrong 100% of the time is still intact !

No Cecilia..I'm speaking of YOU, and brandon and Jeffrey and Little Freaky and Cee etc.
All the Kool Aid drinkers who HAVE to know what's going on( by now) but just can't bring yourselves to admit it.

Posted by: at April 28, 2007 12:01 AM
In layman's terms, everyone that has debunked you and called you out on your never ending lies and hypocrisies. One more thing, you forgot Janet. P.S. I prefer Bud Light or Pale Ale and on occasion Jack Daniels. No kool aid for me, that leaves all the more for you!

I've been debunked ?

Like this one :

Terror attacks up 29%, report says
By Warren P. Strobel and Jonathan S. Landay

WASHINGTON - A State Department report on terrorism due out next week will show a nearly 30 percent increase in terrorist attacks worldwide in 2006 to more than 14,000, almost all of the boost due to growing violence in Iraq and Afghanistan, U.S. officials said Friday.

Time to swiftboat the US State Dept !

Jeff will say the State Dept got their news from the Huffpost.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah

Defending this administration harder than having an elephant pass thru the eye of a needle.

( but that won't stop this herd of wingnuts)

This website's purpose is not to "defend this administration". It's about Keith Olbermann, hence the name, Olbermannwatch. But you liberal Olbyloons seem to think that it's your personal venue for discussing what you perceive to be the E-V-U-L-S (yes, I misspelled that on purpose) of the Bush Administration. You KNOW you can't defend Olbermann so you constantly try to change the subject and then you get pissy when someone dares discuss Keith Olbermann on a website named Olbermannwatch. Face it, he sucked in that debate coverage. And he was obviously not crowd-friendly and was so far out of his depth that Matthews began to openly taunt him about it. Why do you think Olby took a cheap shot at Matthews last night? If he were a real man, he'd have shot back at Matthews DURING the debate coverage. But Olby's not quite the hot shot if he doens't have a script and the laughing stagehand behind him is he? Oh, that's right. You don't want to discuss Olbermann at Olbermannwatch. You want to turn it into Bushwatch instead.

Notice as the news keeps getting worse for Brandon and his party, his attacks on Olbermann who basically reports just how bad things are,are intensified.

Brandon, admit it, it's isn't that this site isn't "Bush Watch" it's b/c you can't STAND to hear the truth about your president, and the sorry state he 's leaving this countty and Iraq.

Such as :

Terror attacks up 29%, report says
By Warren P. Strobel and Jonathan S. Landay

WASHINGTON - A State Department report on terrorism due out next week will show a nearly 30 percent increase in terrorist attacks worldwide in 2006 to more than 14,000, almost all of the boost due to growing violence in Iraq and Afghanistan, U.S. officials said Friday.

This news report flies in the face of all the lies Brandon's been pushing for years.

I only recorded the debate coverage up until 11 PM so I do not have the video of Keith and Chris crowd-surfing.

How scathing! Neocons think that Olbermann looked "a little nervous"...

Meanwhile, Rush is making new friends with his "halfrican american" remarks and his rendition of "Barak the Magic Negro"...

You girls are filthy racists. Confess so that the moderates who haven't caught on can wash their hands of you piles of offal...

When you're a card carrying member of the Bush Republican party...KO looking nervous is about all you got these days !

Olbermann is a partisan hack. He was so out of his league on Thursday night because like you Olbyloon idiots, he believes the BS he reads on the blue blogs and websites. He has about as much idea of what the full story of what's going on in this world as you do, which is to say, about 50% and that may be on the high end of the scale. You're dealing in a skewered reality when you get your news from a biased source. And before someone starts up with the bullsh-t about how "biased" Fox News is, it's not 1/2 as biased as Olbermann's show is on a continuous basis. Wake up, smell the coffee, grow a brain and deal in reality. That way you might not be so out of touch with what's going on in this world. How and why do you think the Dems lost the last two elections? Because they were completely and totally out of touch with America.

Brandon the BU$HWIPE sez:

>And before someone starts up with the bullsh-t about how "biased" Fox News is, it's not 1/2 as biased as Olbermann's show is on a continuous basis. Wake up, smell the coffee, grow a brain and deal in reality.

Reality:

Moron in Chief has shamed the Republicans so badly that the former-BU$HWIPE loyalists don't know whether to embrace a tougher-than-BU$HWIPE-himself pose or run for cover as a "Real Raygun Repluglikunt"

Say, Bush Supporters, How is that Middle East road map to freedums doing?

Oh, wait... "If the Democrats win, the terrorists will strike again"

Hey Dick, I mean Cecelia, what are the latest talking points from Fux News?

Hey Dick, I mean Cecelia, what are the latest talking points from Fux News?

Posted by: Average American Patriot at April 28, 2007 3:34 PM

AAP, any attempt at communication is useless until you check out of Hotel Silly.

Call me then. We'll do lunch.

Bush Supporters!

"And before someone starts up with the bullsh-t abou how "biased" Fox News is, it's not half as biased as Olbermann's show is on a continuous basis."

Ok everybody...Brandon has spoken!

Just forget about that notion you might have had that Fox is every bit, if nor more biased that Countdown, because the all knowing Brandon has just nipped that one right in the bud.

Next subject!

Yes Mike, I've decided I'll try making grand pronouncements like you do in your continued and ongoing efforts to talk about anything BUT Olbermann on a board named Olbermannwatch.

Just forget about that notion you might have had that Fox is every bit, if nor more biased that Countdown, because the all knowing Brandon has just nipped that one right in the bud.

Next subject!

Posted by: Mike at April 28, 2007 7:17 PM
We have a winner! The most asinine statement of the day! How many repubs on Ulbermahn? 0. How many dems on Fox? 15? Maybe 20 in any given week? More lies from lil mikey, what's new.

BovineQueen sez:

How many repubs on Ulbermahn? 0. How many dems on Fox? 15? Maybe 20 in any given week? More lies from lil mikey, what's new.
Posted by: royalking at April 28, 2007 10:30 PM

Oh, Bovine... you are again mixing apples with watermelons.

Thank you Bob!

Oh, Bovine... you are again mixing apples with watermelons.

Thank you Bob!

Posted by: Average American Patriot at April 28, 2007 11:16 PM
A stark raving lunatics view of being debunked, no surprise, here.

Even Chris Matthews made a very pointed comment towards Olbermann about his failure to have any opposing views on his show. No wonder Olbermann was so out of his depth and completely over his head in Thursday's debate. If you only listen to ONE side, you only get one-half of the facts. The Olbylovers can't seem to get it through their thick skulls and tiny little brains that Olbermann isn't speaking "truth to power" when he is so biased in his "reporting". They truly believe each and every single thing they read on their beloved Countdown and their precious (and WRONG) blue blogs and websites. No wonder they're so shocked when they fail to win presidential elections.

The truth of this administration is a LOT WORSE than even Olbermann reports.

Excellent Bil Maher show this week with a women who is a Bagdad correspondent. She said she never is in the "green " zone and her life is in jeopardy each and every day.
What she said was pretty startling about how bad things are in Iraq.
And Bill also had on one of the dismissed attorneys . He spoke just how unprecedented and political these dismissals were.
yes incoming presidents do fire attorneys before they begin their term...but it's never happened IN The MIDDLE OF A TERM.The gentlemen spoke of putting the law above party..and that's what the Bushies couldn't stomach...thus the firings.

The truth really is abominable for supporters of Bush.

There was a female conservative correspondent on...and she look absolutely silly. Especially when she tried to counter the woman who is stationed in Baghdad when she said," I've never actually been there but"

On a number of other topics...she was rendered speechless with the facts.

( This is why you diss Olbermann)
The truth is a bitter pill to swallow for republicans.

You will not find out what is really happening on Fox news...that's for sure.

Bill Maher has news from the horse's mouth...not from the political hacks like Hannity or Limbaugh.

Brandon sez: "They turly believe each and evey single thing they read on their beloved Countdown"

I don't know about you, but i never 'read' Countdown.

I know, I know....there are a few simpletons on this blog who only 'read' Johnny's ridiculous recaps, and as a result, actually believe they've 'seen' Countdown.

Another funny thing is that no matter how many times people like me state the truth...that we rarely, if ever, read the "blue blogs", we will continue to be accused of doing so by Brandon & Co.

Olbermann sucked on Thursday's nights debates. And what do the loons do? Continuously bring us Bush and Iraq to try and change the subject and get off of Olbermann's miserable performance in the debate coverage. Nice try but those of us who watched it noticed how God-awful he was. He's either totally stupid or he's so damned lazy he couldn't be bothered to do debate-prep and arrogant enough to think he could wing it. I believe his co-anchors schooled him though--several times over from what I saw. But that's not a truth you want to deal with either is it? I know it must be hard to see your hero humiliated on national tv and all but for some of us, it was just confirmation for what we already knew about him.

And Mike: I didn't know you could watch or read anything. I thought your head was too far up Olbermann's ass to read or to see.

Brandon sez: "it was just a confrimation for what we already knew about him."

Yea, we know Brandon. When you're not on here bragging about your personal wealth, you're on here running down a news pundit you don't even have to watch.

It's call OBSESSION!

When KO reports on this story, he will be called a liar or stretching the truth by the braindead wingnuts :

Rebuilt Iraq Projects Found Crumbling

By JAMES GLANZ
Published: April 29, 2007

In a troubling sign for the American-financed rebuilding program in Iraq, inspectors for a federal oversight agency have found that in a sampling of eight projects that the United States had declared successes, seven were no longer operating as designed because of plumbing and electrical failures, lack of proper maintenance, apparent looting and expensive equipment that lay idle.

The United States has previously admitted, sometimes under pressure from federal inspectors, that some of its reconstruction projects have been abandoned, delayed or poorly constructed. But this is the first time inspectors have found that projects officially declared a success — in some cases, as little as six months before the latest inspections — were no longer working properly.

The inspections ranged geographically from northern to southern Iraq and covered projects as varied as a maternity hospital, barracks for an Iraqi special forces unit and a power station for Baghdad International Airport.

At the airport, crucially important for the functioning of the country, inspectors found that while $11.8 million had been spent on new electrical generators, $8.6 million worth were no longer functioning.

At the maternity hospital, a rehabilitation project in the northern city of Erbil, an expensive incinerator for medical waste was padlocked — Iraqis at the hospital could not find the key when inspectors asked to see the equipment — and partly as a result, medical waste including syringes, used bandages and empty drug vials were clogging the sewage system and probably contaminating the water system.

The newly built water purification system was not functioning either.

Officials at the oversight agency, the Office of the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction, said they had made an effort to sample different regions and various types of projects, but that they were constrained from taking a true random sample in part because many projects were in areas too unsafe to visit. So, they said, the initial set of eight projects — which cost a total of about $150 million — cannot be seen as a true statistical measure of the thousands of projects in the roughly $30 billion American rebuilding program.

But the officials said the initial findings raised serious new concerns about the effort.

The reconstruction effort was originally designed as nearly equal to the military push to stabilize Iraq, allow the government to function and business to flourish, and promote good will toward the United States.

“These first inspections indicate that the concerns that we and others have had about the Iraqis sustaining our investments in these projects are valid,” Stuart W. Bowen Jr., who leads the office of the special inspector general, said in an interview on Friday.

The conclusions will be summarized in the latest quarterly report by Mr. Bowen’s office on Monday. Individual reports on each of the projects were released on Thursday and Friday.

Brandon sez: "it was just a confrimation for what we already knew about him."

Yea, we know Brandon. When you're not on here bragging about your personal wealth, you're on here running down a news pundit you don't even have to watch.

It's call OBSESSION!

Posted by: Mike at April 29, 2007 3:25 PM

ummmm.....and you're here all the time talking about your past military service and running down people who REALLY are termed "pundits", who you don't have to watch.

Pass the pretzels, Brother Mike. :D

More education for the Bushies!
Avert your eyes, wingnuts >>>>>>>>>>>>>>

82 Inmates Cleared but Still Held at Guantanamo
U.S. Cites Difficulty Deporting Detainees

By Craig Whitlock
Washington Post Foreign Service
Sunday, April 29, 2007; Page A01

LONDON -- More than a fifth of the approximately 385 prisoners at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, have been cleared for release but may have to wait months or years for their freedom because U.S. officials are finding it increasingly difficult to line up places to send them, according to Bush administration officials and defense lawyers.

Since February, the Pentagon has notified about 85 inmates or their attorneys that they are eligible to leave after being cleared by military review panels. But only a handful have gone home, including a Moroccan and an Afghan who were released Tuesday. Eighty-two remain at Guantanamo and face indefinite waits as U.S. officials struggle to figure out when and where to deport them, and under what conditions.

A detainee looks through fencing in the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay, where 385 prisoners remain more than five years after the facility opened.
A detainee looks through fencing in the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay, where 385 prisoners remain more than five years after the facility opened. (By Brennan Linsley -- Associated Press)
Related Article
Ethiopia Continues to Hold U.S. Man, Frustrating Family
TRENTON, N.J. -- The family of a U.S. citizen being held in Ethiopia has grown increasingly frustrated that he remains detained despite reports that he would be released.

The delays illustrate how much harder it will be to empty the prison at Guantanamo than it was to fill it after it opened in January 2002 to detain fighters captured in Afghanistan and terrorism suspects captured overseas.

Here's the part of the above story that was left out:

"In many cases, the prisoners' countries do not want them back. Yemen, for instance, has balked at accepting some of the 106 Yemeni nationals at Guantanamo by challenging the legality of their citizenship.

Another major obstacle: U.S. laws that prevent the deportation of people to countries where they could face torture or other human-rights abuses, as in the case of 17 Chinese Muslim separatists who have been cleared for release but fear they could be executed for political reasons if returned to China.

Compounding the problem are persistent refusals by the United States, its European allies and other countries to grant asylum to prisoners who are stateless or have no place to go.

The 82 cleared prisoners who remain stuck in limbo come from 16 countries in the Middle East, North Africa and South Asia, according to defense attorneys.

The 17 Chinese separatists make up one of the largest contingents. Other countries with multiple prisoners awaiting release include Afghanistan, Sudan, Tunisia, Uzbekistan and Yemen.

The Pentagon has reduced the population at Guantanamo by roughly half since the peak of 680 in May 2003, generally by returning prisoners to their native countries. But U.S. officials said progress has slowed because the remaining cases are so complex.

Of the 385 still incarcerated, U.S. officials said they intend to put 60 to 80 on trial and free the rest. But the judicial process has been glacial, largely because of constitutional challenges.

Only two people have been charged under a military tribunal system approved by Congress last year. One of those cases has been adjudicated. Australian David Hicks pleaded guilty in March to lending material support to terrorists. He was sentenced to nine months in prison and is scheduled to be transferred to Australia in May to serve his time."

cont from above:

"Defense lawyers for some of the 82 cleared prisoners whose release is pending said Hicks received a better deal than did their clients who were not charged with any offenses. "One of the cruel ironies is that in Guantanamo, you've got to plead guilty to be released," said Wizner, the ACLU attorney. "It's the only way out of there."

Complicating the return process is that virtually all the prisoners at Guantanamo come from countries that the State Department has cited for records of human rights abuses. Under U.S. rules, a pattern of abuses in a country does not automatically preclude deportation there. Rather, U.S. officials must investigate each case to determine whether an individual is likely to face persecution.

The investigations are time-consuming and often meet with resistance from the prisoners' home countries, which can be sensitive to suggestions that they allow torture, U.S. officials said. In cases where there is a risk of mistreatment, U.S. policy is to obtain a written promise from the host government that the prisoner will not be abused and that U.S. officials will be allowed to monitor the arrangement.

"It often takes us months and months, or even years, to negotiate the human rights assurances that we are comfortable with before we will transfer someone to another country," said Bellinger, the State Department's legal adviser.

Human rights groups have criticized the written assurances as unreliable. In March, the New York-based group Human Rights Watch issued a report on the fate of seven Russians who were released from Guantanamo three years ago, asserting that three of the men have been tortured since their return.

The watchdog group urged the U.S. government to find third-party countries willing to take Guantanamo inmates who are judged to be at risk for political persecution. U.S. officials countered that they have tried to do that for years, with virtually no success.

Only one country has been willing to accept Guantanamo prisoners who had never previously set foot inside its borders. Last year, after prodding by the State Department, the Balkan nation of Albania agreed to take five Chinese separatists who belong to an ethnic group known as Uighurs.

The men were captured in late 2001 after they crossed the Chinese border into Afghanistan and Pakistan. Their attorneys said they were mistakenly taken into custody and had not taken up arms against U.S. forces. U.S. officials said dozens of countries refused to grant asylum to the Uighurs for fear of angering China, which considers them terrorists for leading a secession movement in the western province of Turkestan.

Seventeen other Uighurs who were caught in similar circumstances have been cleared for release but remain in Guantanamo because the State Department has been unable to find a home for them. Human rights groups have pressed the U.S. government to offer the men asylum, to no avail.

A senior U.S. official who spoke on condition of anonymity said that the Bush administration had considered granting the Uighurs asylum but that the idea was nixed by the Department of Homeland Security. The Uighurs would be rejected under U.S. immigration law, the official said, because they once trained in armed camps and because their separatist front, the East Turkestan Islamic Movement, was labeled a terrorist organization by the U.S. government in 2002.

Attorneys for the Uighurs said their predicament has been compounded by the Pentagon's unwillingness to say they don't pose a national security risk to the U.S. government or its allies. In announcing that the Uighurs had been approved to leave Guantanamo, military officials made a point of noting that they had not been exonerated and were still classified as enemy combatants.

"It's not a distinction that makes sense at all," said Michael J. Sternhell, a New York lawyer whose firm represents four of the Uighurs. "It's a caveat that the Defense Department is offering to cover itself."

Some human rights advocates said the Bush administration could speed things up by asking the United Nations or another international body for help.

Manfred Nowak, an Austrian law professor who serves as the U.N. special monitor on torture, said European allies and other countries would continue to duck requests to accept released prisoners as long as the U.S. government approaches them separately. An international commission responsible for finding a solution, he said, might carry more weight.

"If the U.S. is willing to do something to close down Guantanamo, then it should be done in a cooperative manner with the international community," Nowak said. "It's a question of burden-sharing. Otherwise, every individual country that the U.S. approaches says, 'Why us?' "

Staff researcher Julie Tate in Washington contributed to this report.

Who opened Guantamamo ?
Who created the abuses that took place there?

Who AGAIN is trying to spin the horrors this administration has created ?

Who opened Guantamamo ?
Who created the abuses that took place there?

Who AGAIN is trying to spin the horrors this administration has created ?

Posted by: at April 29, 2007 6:31 PM

There was a recent Supreme Court ruling on this, you know.

Yes threre was.

June 29, 2006 · In a major rebuke to the Bush administration, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Thursday that the president overstepped his power in ordering war-crimes trials for Guantanamo detainees without specific authority from Congress.

By a 5-to-3 vote, the court said that the procedures set up by the president violate both the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the laws of war set out in the Geneva Conventions.

In the immediate aftermath of the Sept. 11 attacks, President Bush set up procedures for war-crimes tribunals that were opposed internally by military lawyers and externally by civil libertarians.

Another loss for Cecilia's side !

You might want to google for something a little more recent than than, Sports Fan...

Here's the part of the above story that was left out:

Of course the loons will leave the most important part of the story! Their hero does the same thing 5 nights a week....

Today's news for Cecilia...hide your eyes !

ex-CIA Chief George Tenet claims in a
new book that he warned the White House in 2002 that intelligence claiming Iraq
was seeking uranium from Niger was unreliable; report finds numerous Iraqi
projects the US declared successful are crumbling; documents show Paul Wolfowitz
was more concerned with his girlfriend's salary at the World Bank than with
tackling world poverty; retired general says Bush should sign Iraq legislation
and begin to pull troops out; investigation finds the United States did not
accept tens of millions of dollars in foreign aid for Katrina victims etc. etc.

Bill Maher has news from the horse's mouth...not from the political hacks like Hannity or Limbaugh.

Posted by: Why Do You Care What My Name is at April 29, 2007 1:32 PM
LOL!

still waiting for your answer, little jeffrey on the rationale for your boycotts on the most popular TV shows, movies and musical groups.

Don't be sacred...tell all.

The fact lil mikey refuses to read Johnny recaps says a lot. He is in deep denial his hero is a major dip sh-t and a pathological liar. If someone was posting hard evidence every night I was a stone faced liar, or my "hero" was, I wouldn't want to read it either. That's never happened to me, so I wouldn't know.

Today's news for Cecilia...hide your eyes !

ex-CIA Chief George Tenet claims in a
new book that he warned the White House in 2002 that intelligence claiming Iraq
was seeking uranium from Niger was unreliable; report finds numerous Iraqi
projects the US declared successful are crumbling; documents show Paul Wolfowitz
was more concerned with his girlfriend's salary at the World Bank than with
tackling world poverty; retired general says Bush should sign Iraq legislation
and begin to pull troops out; investigation finds the United States did not
accept tens of millions of dollars in foreign aid for Katrina victims etc. etc.

Posted by: at April 29, 2007 7:11 PM

I've read all the news today, but I must say, you've gotten even more talented with the scissors since you left out half the other story you pasted here.

Jeff is still dodging my question on his boycotts.

I know it's something you're probably not proud of...but don't be a COWARD and run from the question.

And to think this loser calls decorated military men "cowards".

I've read all the news today, but I must say, you've gotten even more talented with the scissors since you left out half the other story you pasted here.
Posted by: Cecelia at April 29, 2007 7:19 PM

And news you never comment on...for obvious reasons.

FYI..I didn't include the long article for brevity purposes..nothing else.
Funny how you think THE END of an article is more important than the lead paragraphs.

Since you've admitted you actually read the news, still wondering how you can still support an administration so bad...so harmful to the country.
Your capacity for the articles you have to bypass or try not let sink in must be amazing. !

If you want to talk about bypassing news you don't want to see/hear/report, let's talk about Olbermann's constant dodging of anything he perceives as being "good news" for the Bush administration. That's not selective reporting? Of course it is, but in your mind, just so long as he reports only the bad, that makes him Edward R. Freaking Murrow.

Please...tell us what the GOOD news is as far as the Bush Administration goes.

And to think this loser calls decorated military men "cowards".

Posted by: at April 29, 2007 7:20 PM
Funny, Have I ever called Ollie North a coward? Nope.

Posted by: at April 29, 2007 7:20 PM
Funny, Have I ever called Ollie North a coward? Nope.
Posted by: royalking at April 30, 2007 12:39 AM

Oliver North?

Once again, Bovine, you take the prize.

Congratulations!!

BovineQueen! A Real Raygun Repuglikunt!

Debunk the loons, win a prize! Thanks booby, patty and whatever other names you post under!