Buy Text-Link-Ads here
Recent Comments

    follow OlbyWatch on Twitter

    In

    John Gibson Welcomes Back the Infamous, Deplorable Keith Olbermann

    tonyome wrote: <a href="http://twitchy.com/2014/07/28/voxs-laughable-praise-of-keith-olber... [more](11)

    In

    Welcome Back, Olby!

    syvyn11 wrote: <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/keith-olbermann-reviving-worst... [more](9)

    In

    Former Obama Support/Donor Releases Song Supporting Romney/Ryan: "We'll Take It Back Again" by Kyle Tucker

    syvyn11 wrote: @philly I don't see that happening. ESPN has turned hyper left in recent... [more](64)

    In

    Blue-Blog-a-Palooza: Ann Romney Edition!

    djthereplay wrote: By mkdawuss on August 29, 2012 6:17 PM Will John Gibson be having a "Red-B... [more](4)

    In

    No Joy in Kosville...Mighty Olby Has Struck Out

    djwolf76 wrote: "But the FOX-GOP relationship (which is far more distinguished and prevalen... [more](23)

    KO Mini Blog



    What's in the Olbermann Flood Feed?
    Subscribe to Olbermann Flood Feed:
    RSS/XML

    KO Countdown Clock


    Warning: mktime() [function.mktime]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/New_York' for 'EDT/-4.0/DST' instead in /home/owatch/www/www.olbermannwatch.com/docs/countdown.php on line 5
    KO's new contract with MSNBC ends in...
    0 days 0 hours 0 minutes

    OlbermannWatch.com "My Faves" Set

    OlbermannWatch.com Favorited Photos from other Flickr Users

    Got OlbyPhotos? See some on Flickr? DO NOT email us. Send us a FlickrMail instead. Include a link to the photo. If we like the photo you will see it displayed in the Olby Flickr Flood above.

    New to Flickr? Sign up for a FREE Flickr account!


    Got some OlbyVideo? See some on YouTube? DO NOT email us. Send us a YouTube Messages instead. Include a link to the video. If we like the video you will see it displayed in our favorites list in our YouTube page.

    New to YouTube? Sign up for a FREE YouTube account!

    Red Meat Blog
    Keith Olbermann Quotes
    Countdown Staff Writers

    If they're not on Keith's payroll...

    ...they should be...

    Crooks & Liars
    Daily Kos
    Eschaton
    Huffington Post
    Media Matters for America
    MyDD
    News Corpse
    No Quarter
    Raw Story
    Talking Points Memo
    Think Progress
    TVNewser
    Keith Lovers

    MSNBC's Countdown
    Bloggerman
    MSNBC Transcripts
    MSNBC Group at MSN

    Drinking with Keith Olbermann
    Either Relevant or True
    KeithOlbermann.org
    Keith Olbermann is Evil
    Olbermann Nation
    Olbermann.org
    Thank You, Keith Olbermann

    Don't Be Such A Douche
    Eyes on Fox
    Liberal Talk Radio
    Oliver Willis
    Sweet Jesus I Hate Bill O'Reilly

    Anonymous Rat
    For This Relief Much Thanks
    Watching Olbermann Watch

    Keith Olbermann Fanlisting Site I
    Keith Olbermann Fanlisting Site II
    Keith Olbermann Links
    Olberfans
    Sports Center Altar
    Nothing for Everyone

    Democratic Underground KO Forum
    Television Without Pity KO Forum
    Loony KO Forum (old)
    Loony KO Forum (new)
    Olberfans Forum (old)
    Olberfans Forum (new)
    Keith Watchers

    186k per second
    Ace of Spades HQ
    Cable Gamer
    Dean's World
    Doug Ross@Journal
    Extreme Mortman
    Fire Keith Olbermann
    Hot Air
    Inside Cable News
    Instapundit
    Jawa Report
    Johnny Dollar's Place
    Just One Minute
    Little Green Footballs
    Mark Levin
    Media Research Center
    Moonbattery.com
    Moorelies
    National Review Media Blog
    Narcissistic Views
    Newsbusters
    Pat Campbell Show
    Radio Equalizer
    Rathergate
    Riehl World View
    Sister Toldjah
    Toys in the Attic
    Webloggin
    The Dark Side of Keith Olbermann
    World According to Carl

    Thanks for the blogroll link!

    Age of Treason
    Bane Rants
    The Blue Site
    Cabal of Doom-De Oppresso Libre
    Chuckoblog
    Conservative Blog Therapy
    Conservathink
    Country Store
    Does Anyone Agree?
    The Drunkablog!
    Eclipse Ramblings
    If I were President of USA
    I'll Lay Down My Glasses
    Instrumental Rationality
    JasonPye.com
    Kevin Dayhoff
    Last Train Out Of Hell
    Leaning Straight Up
    Limestone Roof
    Mein BlogoVault
    NostraBlogAss
    Peacerose Journal
    The Politics of CP
    Public Secrets: from the files of the Irishspy
    Rat Chat
    Return of the Conservatives
    The Right Place
    Rhymes with Right
    seanrobins.com
    Six Meat Buffet
    Sports and Stuff
    Stout Republican
    Stuck On Stupid
    Things I H8
    TruthGuys
    Verum Serum
    WildWeasel

    Friends of OlbyWatch

    Aaron Barnhart
    Eric Deggans
    Jason Clarke
    Ron Coleman
    Victria Zdrok
    Keith Resources

    Google News: Keith Olbermann
    Feedster: Keith Olbermann
    Technorati: Keith Olbermann
    Wikipedia: Keith Olbermann
    Wikipedia: Countdown
    Wikiality: Keith Olbermann
    Keith Olbermann Quotes on Jossip
    Keith Olbermann Photos
    NNDB Olbermann Page
    IMDB Olbermann Page
    Countdown Guest Listing & Transcripts
    Olbermann Watch FAQ
    List of Politics on Countdown (by party)
    Mark Levin's Keith Overbite Page
    Keith Olbermann's Diary at Daily Kos
    Olbermann Watch in the News

    Houston Chronicle
    Playboy
    The Journal News
    National Review
    San Antonio Express
    The Hollywood Reporter
    The Journal News
    Los Angeles Times
    American Journalism Review
    Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
    St. Petersburg Times
    Kansas City Star
    New York Post/Page Six
    Washington Post
    Associated Press
    PBS
    New York Daily News
    Online Journalism Review
    The Washingon Post
    Hartford Courant
    WTWP-AM
    The New York Observer
    The Washington Post


    Countdown with Keith Olbermann
    Great Moments in Broadcast Journalism
    Great Thanks Hall of Fame
    Keith Olbermann
    MSM KO Bandwagon
    Olbermann
    Olbermann Watch Channel on You Tube
    Olbermann Watch Debate
    Olbermann Watch Image Gallery
    Olbermann Watch Polling Service
    OlbermannWatch
    OlbyWatch Link Roundup
    TVNewser "Journalism"

    July 2013
    September 2012
    August 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009
    August 2009
    July 2009
    June 2009
    May 2009
    April 2009
    March 2009
    February 2009
    January 2009
    December 2008
    November 2008
    October 2008
    September 2008
    August 2008
    July 2008
    June 2008
    May 2008
    April 2008
    March 2008
    February 2008
    January 2008
    December 2007
    November 2007
    October 2007
    September 2007
    August 2007
    July 2007
    June 2007
    May 2007
    April 2007
    March 2007
    February 2007
    January 2007
    December 2006
    November 2006
    October 2006
    September 2006
    August 2006
    July 2006
    June 2006
    May 2006
    April 2006
    March 2006
    February 2006
    January 2006
    December 2005
    November 2005
    October 2005
    September 2005
    August 2005
    June 2005
    May 2005
    April 2005
    March 2005
    February 2005
    January 2005
    December 2004
    November 2004

    Google

    Olbermann Watch Masthead

    Managing Editor

    Robert Cox
    olby at olbywatch dot com

    Contributors

    Mark Koldys
    Johnny Dollar's Place

    Brandon Coates
    OlbyWatch

    Chris Matthews' Leg
    Chris Matthews' Leg

    Howard Mortman
    Extreme Mortman

    Trajan 75
    Think Progress Watch

    Konservo
    Konservo

    Doug Krile
    The Krile Files

    Teddy Schatz
    OlbyWatch

    David Lunde
    Lundesigns

    Alex Yuriev
    Zubrcom

    Red Meat
    OlbyWatch



    Technorati Links to OlbyWatchLinks to OlbermannWatch.com

    Technorati Links to OlbyWatch Blog posts tagged with "Olbermann"

    Combined Feed
    (OlbyWatch + KO Mini-blog)

    Who Links To Me


    Mailing List RSS Feed
    Google Groups
    Subscribe to Olbermann Watch Mailing List
    Email:
    Visit this group



    XML
    Add to Google
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Subscribe with Bloglines
    Subscribe in NewsGator Online

    Add to My AOL
    Subscribe with Pluck RSS reader
    R|Mail
    Simpify!
    Add to Technorati Favorites!

    Subscribe in myEarthlink
    Feed Button Help


    Olbermann Watch, "persecuting" Keith since 2004


    April 2, 2007
    Countdown with Keith Olbermann - April 2, 2007

    "COUNTDOWN WITH KEITH OLBERMANN" (8:00 P.M.-9:00 P.M. ET)

    Host: Keith Olbermann

    Topics/Guests:

    • PRES. BUSH - GONZALEZ-GATE AND IRAQ: Craig Crawford, Congressional Quarterly columnist and MSNBC political analyst; Sen. Joe Biden (D-Del.)
    • 1982 FEATURE FILM "TRON" HAS SENSITIVE INFORMATION: Roger Cressey, counterterrorism expert and MSNBC terrorism analyst

    Keith bellowed the opening spiel in his typical fashion. Gee, it led with Matthew Dowd's unfavorable comments about "Mister" Bush. What a surprise, there. Not! Plus McCain, a "special guest" who's running for President (guess which party?), Will Farrell, Britney Spears, and more. Hmm. Do you get the idea that there are still several dogs who won't be permitted to bark on OlbyPlanet?

    UPDATE (RCox): Video & Transcript

    Fox News Channel's Bill O'Reilly book Culture Warrior

    Leading off The Hour of Spin: Big News. Big, BIG, BIG!! News. "Mister" Bush did not throw out an opening pitch at a baseball game today. Besides, Matthew Dowd said something critical about "Mister" Bush, and that means that Dowd's comments are suddenly headline-worthy. Then it was on to the latest attack on Richard McCain, back to Bush's non-appearance in a baseball field, and then on to Keithy's "special guest".

    The latest partisan politico to be given a blue-dress interview on Countdown: none other than Joe Biden. [Who can deny the stunning indictment of Herr Olbermann that is The List?] Once again Edward R Olbermann honed in with his perspicacious, scalpel-like questioning:

    • What did you think of the Matthew Dowd interview?
    • Did you have faith in "Mister" Bush that was misplaced? [Objection: leading!]
    • How do you reconcile your vote for force in Iraq?
    • Is there any other conclusion to draw other than McCain misled us? [Objection: leading and suggestive!]
    • Relative to our separations of government and what we're doing about Iraq, where do we stand on the threatened veto?
    • Re Gonzales prepping for testimony: Does that sound logical? How hard do you have to study about your own agency? [Objection: even more leading and suggestive!]

    Biden wiped the stain from his pants; he was not Great Thanksed, but was Pleasured.

    #4: No doubt this will be where Krazy Keith gets into the outrageous story of the movie Tron and the eeevil Bush administration. Isn't that Roger Cressey on screen? Oh wait, no. This is about candidates and fund-raising. Anne Kornblut of the Washington Post bloviated in a fashion far too even-handed for OlbyPlanet. Great thanks.

    The #3 story finally got around to Monkeymann's expose of the reckless Homeland Security Department and an old Disney movie. Oh wait, no it didn't. It was about a Supreme Court decision on global warming, courtesy of regurgitated video from NBC. Funny, there was another Supreme Court decision that didn't get reported. But we'll leave that for the non-barking dogs. KO thanked the unspooling tape machine.

    Now we'll get Roger Cressey analyzing the crackdown on Tron? Oops, no. Instead: Will Farrell (more recycled video), Trump, Warren Beatty. #1: The greatest fools in the country, with Paul F Tompkins.

    In the Media Matters Minute, the infamous, deplorable Keith Olbermann levelled another attack on Matt Drudge (Blue Blog Source: Think Progress), plus a Congressman (R) (Blue Blog Source: Talking Points Memo). Plus we got O'Reilly attack #173 (Blue Blog Source: TVNewser). A reference to "Joe McCarthy" [Ding!] as Keitho claimed O'Reilly cut a guest's mic because "he didn't like what she was saying". He only cited the tail end of the interview, ignoring the discussion that took place in the rest of the lengthy segment. Though you'd never know it on OlbyPlanet, there is another perspective [mp3 audio]:

    Stories Olbermann refuses to report

    Dogs that did not bark (special Katy Turic edition):

    The President's strongly disliked.
    Olby gets so upset that he's psyched.
    But his habeas rants
    Are indeed biased slants.
    So another court ruling gets spiked.

    Olby's news judgment is so dead-on.
    He spends time on where Britney has gone.
    When it comes to import,
    Other news just falls short.
    So again no report on Iran.

    Krazy Keith on Iraq has been tough.
    No more money for war, it's enough.
    But he won't say a word
    When Obama demurred
    And said threats to cut funds are a bluff!

    So where was the breaking news story about the Bush administration trying to sieze all copies of Tron? The one that the Countdown staff promoted this afternoon as one of their top two stories? The one that Roger Cressey was set to expound on? The one "Man on Fan" Olbermann no doubt was ready to make into a Special Education Komment about the eeevils of "Mister" Bush? Oh that one? As we know, it was a hoax. Completely made up. But just like the wackiest far-left blogs, Monkeymann fell for it and was ready to launch into OlbyPlanet HyperboleDrive. Luckily for him, Olbermann Watch warned him off this story and another humilitating Great Moment in Journalism was avoided. But we've done our good deed for the year. The next time you're about to step in it, Fat Ass, we will not intervene.

    NAME

    Olbermann's book The book that bears Olbermann's name is an impressive #30,154 at amazon.com, while "Culture Warrior" is #301. (It's that 2-for-$25 sale!) The OlbyTome is #3,944 at Barnes & Noble; O'Reilly's book is #1,283 there, and is one of the top five books of 2006 per Publishers Weekly. Oh dear. Friday's Hour of Spin sunk like a rock, third place overall and a humiliating fourth place in the critical, beloved, all-important, coveted "key demo". Tonight's MisterMeter reading: 5 [ELEVATED]

    UPDATE (RCox): Video & Transcript

    Read the transcript to the Monday show


    user-pic

    327 Comments

    So it’s here the Olber-Obsessed like to Congregate-
    Spewing their blatant hypocrisy and hate,
    They disagree with you while contradicting themselves-
    Almost like they learned it from Keith-O himself…

    They pretend to engage you in actual debate-
    But they really prefer to mutually masturbate,
    If you believe their lies, you’re only fooling yourself-
    Like a ‘talking points memo’ from O’Reilly himself…

    A Bible in one hand and Culture Warrior in the other-
    They lash out at the Left just like they did their own mother,
    They dislike real news and always tune into Fox-
    Their collective IQ equals a box full of rocks…

    With their sights locked in on the Secular Progressive-
    They pretend the Bushies aren’t the least bit oppressive,
    They think we’re winning the war on Terror in Iraq,
    While Al-Qaeda’s in Afghanistan planning an Attack…

    They parrot what their leader Cox always tells them-
    They quickly buy up what Johnny Dollar has to sell them,
    They wear their Factor Gear with the pride of a sheep,
    With a white-washed conscience they count themselves to sleep…

    Their world is all Olbermann, all day and all night-
    They follow his ratings and patrol this website,
    They think it’s their duty to ‘Fix’ all the Loons-
    I’m sorry dear Olber-Obsessed, No one’s crazy as you!

    Wow! system 32 can copy and paste!

    I'm impressed.

    I wonder if he was truth syndicate last week claiming he could type, get info on all of us, and cook a mean steak in under an hour.

    What happen to that guy?

    Well since 32 is obessed with Bill O'Reilly I'd just like to say that Bill said on his radio show today that "Culture Warrior" has gone into it's 10th printing.

    A lot of crazy people out there snapping up "Culture Warrior" these days.

    Ya know I have nothing planned tomorrow. Maybe I'll go down to the course and play 18. With my 'no spin golf balls'.

    But Johnny, I must say I'm a little peeved with you for giving Olby the heads up about that fake story.

    I would have loved ' Zombie Nation' to post here tonight telling us how the story was true because Olby speaks 'truth to power'!

    Look Johnny, let Olby say all this wacky stuff. If all else fails, that wacky 9/11 Bush blew up the towers crowd will follow him.

    And yeah 32. I think that crowd is a little more off their trolly than somebody with a bible and a copy of ' Culture Warrior' in their hands.

    Johnny,

    When you say that the Countdown staff pumped up the Tron story this afternoon, was on done live or through the internet?

    The press dept of MSNBC issued their release this afternoon sometime around 3:30 pm or so. I got the email around that time. That email daily includes the listing that appears at the top of every nightly OW recap that we publish. Not having watched A-Mess-NBC during the day, I don't know what their promos were plugging. I only know that they had the story ready to go, with Roger Cressey on deck to analyze the situation.

    "Olbermann Watch warned him off this story and another humilitating Great Moment in Journalism was avoided. But we've done our good deed for the year. The next time you're about to step in it, Fat Ass, we will not intervene."


    Damn, Johnny! How could you! :D

    After all the over-the-top "special-ed comments" on habeas corpus Keith "The Only News that Fit for Blue Blogger Ears" Olbermann spikes the outcome.


    I got especially tickled during K.O.'s introduction of the list of fools, when he said that fools had certainly made Countdown what it is.

    A 5-4 vote is being "taken to the wood shed?" Only in olbyland. Why didn't Ulbermahn play the actual video from Fridays O'Reilly with the traitor Col? Answer, it wouldn't have spun as easy as reading 5 seconds of 2 1/2 minutes of her spewing left wing propaganda and not answering ther one question Bill asked.

    probably the same Olbyloon who writes songs to KO, and yesterday wrote an entire fake "AP" story on him as an April Fool's Joke. She and her galpals are the real joke though.

    Johnny,

    Thanks for responding. I wanted you on record for those who want "proof."

    Olbermahn could not possibly play the O'Reilly/Wright video, let alone the audio clip we posted. They were talking about the Iran Hostage Crisis. Not one word is permitted to be said about that on OlbyPlanet.

    What did you tell Keith Olbermann not to do? Juggle MSNBC pundits? Dress up like Bill O' Rielly? Go to Iran ?

    Johnny,

    I am convinced that Olby (and Matthews) are praying that the situation gets resolved so that they never have to mention it. Not praying because the hostages will be released but only to save face.

    Why did Paris Hilton make number 2 on the list of fools? What did she do wrong?

    Keith Olbermann's guide to watching the O'reilly Factor.

    Baby Oil, Check!
    Beach towel, check!
    Door locked, check!
    ringer off, message machine on, check!
    shades pulled, check!
    coasters set out for Dana Milbank just in case, check!

    Time to " watch " the Factor.

    Oh, hell. What in the world would make OW warn "news anchor" Keith Olberman and his MSNBC prime time cable "news cast" off a whacky blue blog story so they can watch Olbermann do yet another obsequious interview with a Democratic pol and hypocritically insult Matt Drudge?

    Matt Drudge has more credibility in that old timey hat he wears than Olby has in his entire body.

    By the way, maybe Paris Hilton was on his list of fools because she wasn't interested in Edward R. Scizzormouth.

    Sharon, you asked on another thread what I thought of the Tron almost made it to air story?

    I'm not sure I can articulate an opinion. It is so surreal that Bugs Bunny, Daffy Duck or Elmer Fudd are probably more qualified than any of us to comment on it.

    The only thought that comes to mind is that KO is on the verge or has already lost any meager store of rationality that he had left. The second thing that just came to mind is how are the galpals and other KO worshipping sites going to react, if they do, to this.

    Grammie

    Sorry, Pat, the list of fools is not MSNBC sourced but a poll taken within the states.

    Thanks, Obama.

    And to be honest, what right do they have to put the president and the vice president of the United States on the list for what they perceive as failures when we all know that starting war is more complicated and have more sources and causes if they supposedly go wrong. How dare they blame any one person and then stick 'em high on the list?

    I wonder what defence The Kult of Keith will have for the Tron story. Keith's paranoid. A certifiable nut!

    I about puked when I heard Joe Biden claim that he and others didn't vote to give the president the authority to go to war but to avoid war. The only candidate who has outright claimed that he was wrong is Edwards who, interestingly says he should suffer the consequences. What kind of consequences does he mean? I made a mistake and demonstrated poor judgment so now reward me with the one of the most powerful positions in the world.

    Go Pens and Fred Thompson

    I called it today. I knew Olbermann would attack O'Reilly for cutting off that wako's mic. The reason was clear. O'Reilly asked her what should be done about Iran and she proceeded to attack the United States for sending ships to the Gulf. She must be a hero to Olbermann since he is determined to spike the hostage story.

    Grammie,

    You sounded the horn and the Joker appeared. Are you the Joker : )

    Ulbermahn supports Iran. That's why he hasn't condemed them.

    Sharon: There is no such thing as voting to avoid war. Every single day the idea of leadership is to avoid war. Avoiding a war is not something that the senate votes on. No such thing. Voting not to go into war, yes, and voting for war happen ... but anyone who says that is just as well lame duck ---

    Sharon,

    LOL!

    Obama,
    What do you think of Ulbermahn almost running the Tron story? It shows his paranoia!

    Tron? Ulbermahn is desperate to blame/point anything he can (negative) on the Bush admministration. His show clearly panders to the FAR left, i.e. When does he go on The View?

    The Joker: Well, that whole Will Ferrel piece seemed out of the ordinary. Olbermann probably could not get the rights to show images from the movie or to make the comparrisons that he wanted to make and the whole deal went up in smoke. That Will Ferrel thing is blatant promoting. Why MSNBC did it is completely cheesy, at best ...

    royalking,
    If someone can get Ulbermahn's address I say we should all email him copies of Tron!

    That is why Joe Biden will not be the next President. He won't do well in the debate. One of the best comebacks was when Biden accusingly asked Ashcroft if he was sending a loved one to war to which Ashcroft responded that his son was currently serving in Iraq.

    I about puked when I heard Joe Biden claim that he and others didn't vote to give the president the authority to go to war but to avoid war. Posted by: Sharon at April 3, 2007 12:25 AM


    Amen and Amen! Can you believe that there is another pundit ...let alone journalist....alive...on the right or the left...that would have unquestioningly let ANY pol...get away with such a thing? Would Matthews... or Cooper... or Larry King... for god's sake? NO WAY!

    No buts...no whats... no nothing...but "thank you, Sir.... from Olbermann.

    How could any one who opposed the war be comfortable with that level of obsequious fealty? THIS is speaking truth to power? Just make him the chairman of the DNC!

    Come on Cecelia, give poor Olby a break. He had to let Biden blather on because his breaking story blew up. He should have just had Mary Carey come on and play with her hair for 10 minutes as she stumps for her future presidency.

    The reason why Joe Biden is not going to be president is because he made that snide comment about Barrack Obama. It shows Keith Olbermann's cowardice that he did not ask Joe Biden to appologize or explain his actions, and it has came to what I expect from Keith Olbermann in the first place. A small man indeed.

    Rico, are you out there? If you are I have a message for you:

    IT'S GREAT! TO BE! A FLORIDA GATOR!

    CHOMP! CHOMP!

    My Gators own your Buckeyes. In fact the SEC owns the Big 10. UF is the center of the collegiate sports universe!!

    > Why MSNBC did it is completely cheesy, at best ...

    Possibly because at the last minute they had to pull a story, and it left a gaping hole, so they plugged in anything they could find.

    Johnny,
    Do you thinik Ulbermahn is that paranoid that he believed the Tron story or is he so Far Left that he was going to run with it true or false!

    I see they didn't replay KO at 10pm...I guess that little experiment blew-up in their face..HA! HA! HA!

    No, it was on a blue blog. It made Bush look bad. Ergo, he believed it. Now that Olbermann Watch saved him from his folly, he will read this site even more compulsively from now on.

    Come on Cecelia, give poor Olby a break. He had to let Biden blather on because his breaking story blew up. He should have just had Mary Carey come on and play with her hair for 10 minutes as she stumps for her future presidency.

    Posted by: Sharon at April 3, 2007 12:42 AM

    Well, Bob's oppossum could have spontaneously reacted more like a journalist than Olbermann.

    mlong: MSNBC is the only news channel that shows documentaries on a regular basis --- why spoil a good thing ?

    Johnny,
    So this proves that Ulbermahn is just a propaganda artist and not a newsperson. Hence that's why the Kult of Keith is silent!

    No, it was on a blue blog. It made Bush look bad. Ergo, he believed it. Now that Olbermann Watch saved him from his folly, he will read this site even more compulsively from now on.

    Posted by: johnny dollar at April 3, 2007 12:53 AM


    Johnny, Johnny, Johnyy.... Do you really think Olbermann must believe something derogatory about the President before he'd pass it on? He discovered he couldn't get away with it.

    (I'm barely speaking to you, by the way.)

    I wasn't really defending him, Cecelia. I just read an article linked to Drudge how a U.K. paper claims the hostage situation is the fault of the U.S. Olby and Matthews now have that spin that they so desperately needed.

    You should have let Olbermann run with the story. Th cycle woulde gone on ...

    wasn't really defending him, Cecelia. I just read an article linked to Drudge how a U.K. paper claims the hostage situation is the fault of the U.S. Olby and Matthews now have that spin that they so desperately needed.

    Posted by: Sharon at April 3, 2007 12:59 AM


    I know you weren't, Sharon. I just read that piece too.

    It will be interesting to see if you're right. You nearly always are.

    Yup, Ulbermqahn now will defend his Itanian buddies by blaming America.
    What a suprise!

    He is in a bit of a conundrum. He will have to think of a way to sequay to the story without drawing attention to the fact that he has been spiking it.

    I love watching the rerun of Countdown at 11 pm. It's like a continuation of The Daily Show and The Colbert report from the hour before. This show has to be comedy. No one can really take it seriously.


    Can they?

    I thought of a way he might do it but then he may be totally clueless and I would give him the idea.

    olber\mann is the biggest a--hole on tv.

    Sharon,


    It's ironic that Drudge doesn't spike stories but Olbermann does.

    It will be interesting to see why other news outlets laid low and let a Murdoch paper scoop the story and what aspects of the story made that necessary.

    Funny how Drudge has been mentioned several times tonight with no mention whatsoever of the fake Michael Ware 'heckling' story they actually DID run...and then quietly retracted the "developing story" when it turned out to be a lie.

    Par for the course on this board!

    Ya'll sleep tight now!

    Gee what happen to that system 32 guy?

    I wanted to know since he called us sheep and I guess he thinks we blindly follow Bill O'Reilly.

    Should starting tomorrow , should we be having a copy of 'The Bible' , 'Coulture Warrior', and. Since he had that far right winger senator and his wife on.

    The New Book by John and Teresa Kerry with us too?

    That's why they are 'Zombie Nation'. They are so wrapped up in their hate that they can't see Bill agrees with a lot (but not all) of the global climate change stuff.

    Which I think is hooey! Oh oh! I'm not following like sheep! I disagree with Bill O'Reilly.

    But how many people would believe a Tron story?

    Jim Jones is alive and well and reporting from a studio in Secaucus.

    Let's see the percent of stories Drudge posts that turn out false.

    Compaired to the percent of stories Olby screws up with the facts.

    The percent would be smaller with Drudge, where Olby is almost batting 100% in the screw up department.

    And what ever did happen to those Karl Rove indicments?

    And that Joe Biden tonight? Well he does have crappy poll numbers, so I guess it would be right for him to go on a show with crappy ratings.

    What ever did happen to that firm grip on second place?

    Or how's this

    Wow! Drudge screwed up!

    Wow! Olby screwed up again!!!

    I was hoping like hell Olbermann did the Tron story. Darn!

    I hear their going to display an anatomically correct Chocolate Olbermann in the MSNBC lobby.

    Dan Abrams was seen buying 55 gallons of hot fudge and 2 chocolate covered raisins.

    Gee, who wound Puck up?

    Has he wound down yet?

    Keith is predictable.......O'Reilly's treatment of his guest earned him WPITW......the pattern continues......Keith attacks/O'Reilly ignores/Keith attacks/O'Reilly ignores......

    and O'Reilly continues to kill Olbermann in the ratings analysis......the same patterns.

    MSNBC enjoys failure, and likes paying more for it too.

    Lower ratings numbers for Mr. Olbermann means the need for a "Special Comment" soon, I am sure. More predictable knee-jerking.

    75% of the digs at Olbermann featured on this site focus on his physical attributes and appearance. I just found a picture of Robert Cox that suggests that the OW blogger lives in a very delapidated glass house.

    (http://flamingolake.wordpress.com/2007/03/ - scroll down to near the bottom).

    How dare you look like that, Sir?!

    "And what ever did happen to those Karl Rove indicments?"

    In a discussion of lies, Puck throws up only one old instance of a failed prediction. Can he not percieve the distinction?

    Drudge printed outright fabrications about Ware- Countdown tried to predict what should happen to Rove given the undisputable facts they reported.

    Any shelter in a storm, eh?

    Where's your picture on the internet, Sir Loin of Milquetoast?

    Habeaus Corpus...never to be uttered again out of KO's mouth again.

    We should be happy for the little things in life.

    Notice Teheran Keith's Kultists have not commented on the Tron stoty. They know he's being exposed as a Propaganda artist!

    Funny how Drudge has been mentioned several times tonight with no mention whatsoever of the fake Michael Ware 'heckling' story they actually DID run...and then quietly retracted the "developing story" when it turned out to be a lie.

    Par for the course on this board!

    Ya'll sleep tight now!

    Posted by: Mike at April 3, 2007 2:35 AM


    Drudge runs things damaging to both side though he gets it wrong occasionally.

    But that's your answer to criticism that Olbermann spikes stories that aren't favorable to the left, even if he's previously harped on them to the point of suggesting we're nearing tyranny... AND like Drudge, Olbermann gets it wrong occasionally...

    Par for the course with YOU...

    JUST ANOTHER DAY AND NIGHT OF KEITH STALKING BY THE MENTAL MIDGETS FROM PLANET FOX!

    "JUST ANOTHER DAY AND NIGHT OF KEITH STALKING BY THE MENTAL MIDGETS FROM PLANET FOX!"

    You're just mad Keith has been exposed again as a fraud. He was caught about to run a prank about Tron. It shows how much of a delusional fool he is.
    Also why hasn't Keith mentioned the Iranhostage situation?
    Hmmm?

    It is interesting if one reads the transcript of the WPITW segment that Olbermann does not mention THE SUBJECT O'Reilly and Colonel Wright were to be talking about.....The Iranian Hostage standoff......Olbermann leaves one with the impression thesubject was the Bush Administration violating the Geneva Conventions.....LIAR!

    Those who defend this fraud....please tell me how one can see the segment any other way.....Olbermann lied about the exchange in order to put O'Reilly in the worst light. Then Keith, the drama queen, invokes McCarthy at the end......

    Misinformation by a "journalist," is much worse than the egotistical O'Reilly cutting someone off ON HIS OWN PRIVATLY FUNDED TV SHOW! Joe McCarthy indeed.

    Nevermind that Olbermann lifted yet another story from the liberal net, without any reference given.

    Funny how Drudge has been mentioned several times tonight with no mention whatsoever of the fake Michael Ware 'heckling' story they actually DID run...and then quietly retracted the "developing story" when it turned out to be a lie.

    Par for the course on this board!

    Ya'll sleep tight now!

    Posted by: Mike at April 3, 2007 2:35 AM
    What happened to your "gone by monday" prediction on Gonzales? That was Monday before last...

    Olberman is overall pretty fair. He has made a couple of slipups, but hey, but they are in good faith, and hey, that's the nature of the business. Hey, I watch his show religiously and try to document it's accuracy for the viewership so they can judge for themselves. I have determined that Countdown has made 18 factual mistakes since the NCL incident which is what got me interested. What do you think?

    18 "slip-ups"? Are you insane you freaking loon? Try 18 hundred million kabillion zazafazillion! Krazy Kulty Koran Keith tells nothing but lies by the bushel. And they aren't "slip-ups." They are an insideous pattern of deception pumped up by the liberal MSM, which is the only news source now, run by liberals, for liberals, and of the liberals under no god so help me allah!

    Uh-oh. Methinks the lady doth protest to much. Set phasers on "troll."

    Here we go again! Forgive me for even starting this.

    Mercy is not of a forced quality. It falls from the heavens as a gentle rain.

    Plus, you're a douche-bag

    Gonzalez stays on and on and on, like the energizer bunny. Only his electrodes are hooked up to the genetalia. Zappo!! Take that you enemy combattant!!

    Hey-ho!!!

    RoyalKing: "what happened to your "gone by Monday" prediction on Gonzales? That was Monday before last..."

    Jeff, THIS is a good example why I keep calling you a moron!

    I NEVER made any predictions about Gonzales. Yes, moron, I know....SOMEBODY on this board made that prediction....I read it too, BUT IT WASN'T ME WHO MADE IT!!!!!

    Now this must be at least lie number 102 of your's on this board. No one but a total moron could keep getting caught in lies and incorrect assertions like you keep doing...and not be totally embarrassed by it.

    "Ugly" is what Keith called Matt Drudge
    Sophomoric, but you be the judge
    Olby's name-calling
    And shrill caterwauling
    Have journalists holding a grudge

    I worried that some people may have hurt feelings. Please tone down the rhetoric people. Not all of us are made of steel.

    "I worried that some people may have hurt feelings."

    Why, let the stricken deer go weep, The hart ungalled play; For some must watch, while some must sleep: So runs the world away.

    Ah yes, lest I forget...You're a douchbag.

    Jesus Christ you are a hardass, Cec.

    Krazy Keith is grinding away
    at his little pet peeve of the day
    "You're all mean to gays"
    "And harmless blue jays"
    "with your pestocidal DMA forreys!"

    "Jesus Christ you are a hardass, Cec."

    How dare you look at my rump, sir?? Seriously, Royal, I appreciate the compliment sweety. I'm not one of these liberal feminazis you know, sweety.

    Tone it down kids, I'm too old for such titter-tatter! Let's keep on message here. Olberman is a bady!

    All one has to do is parade "The List" around to conclusively illustrate that KO is the most biased reporter on TV.

    Dead on, Little Feechie. Dead on. We all need to try our best to publicize this. It is an abomination. The liberal media MSM is pulling the wool over everyone's eyes so they can't see what this little Iranian-Iraqian agent is doing.

    cecelia, the 12:58 was not me, the loser/namejacker/jealous ass couldn't even spell my name right!

    Typical! I knew I smelled a troll. If you can't argue, you just obfuscate.

    I still don't mind comments on my rear.

    Take the high road Jeff. These people are not worth your time. They're so deep up Obermann's heiny that they can't see what a waste of time their little obsession is.

    Hey where'd the 10pm rerun go??? Prison Stories getting higher ratings than Keith?

    Let's put your rear behind us Ceclilia!! ; > 0

    Can you believe the "puffers" have no mention of the Iran hostage situation? Ulbermahn gives it no mention? I guess lil Mikey must be right, if the &*^%puffers think it's not a "political" story and KK thinks the same thing, then it must not be a "political" story.....or even a "newsworthy" story.

    What do you expect from the MSM royal? These guys wouldn't know the apocolyse from a hole in the ground. It's just too bad the country has to twiddle while Iran comes at us with nukes because of these lazy minded sheep.

    "Puffers" is perfect. That's is mostly what they do, either puffing in horror at the evil of the Bush administration, or puffing on their cannabus. Either way they are just blowing smoke!!

    Ceclilia shoots and scores!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Cecelia, I think it's a certain disgruntled olbyloon......the namejacker, that is. He pops in using his real name, and in between makes childish jabs and mocks.

    More predictable knee-jerking.
    Posted by: cee at April 3, 2007 9:25 AM

    Exactly...

    Compaired to the percent of stories Olby screws up with the facts.
    Posted by: puck at April 3, 2007 2:49 AM

    Olby screws up stories with facts...?

    Exactly Puck, Exactly...

    Dave = Ceclilia = roylaking = Granie = King-Internet

    Olbyloons at play.

    I never said the Iranian hostage situation was not a 'newsworthy' story. I said it was NOT a political story...not yet anyway...and I stand by that opinion.

    Now go back and defend your most recent LIE you told at 11:59 about me supposedly claiming "Gonzales would be gone by Monday"... you lying moron!

    Of course you won't liar....you'll just go on to tell a brand new lie the next time.

    I wonder what defence The Kult of Keith will have for the Tron story. Keith's paranoid. A certifiable nut!
    Posted by: The Joker at April 3, 2007 12:19 AM

    The Joker calling someone paranoid?

    Now that's rich!

    Oh, hell. What in the world would make OW warn "news anchor" Keith Olberman and his MSNBC prime time cable "news cast" off a whacky blue blog story so they can watch Olbermann do yet another obsequious interview with a Democratic pol and hypocritically insult Matt Drudge?
    Posted by: Cecelia at April 2, 2007 11:43 PM

    Must be the 'Love' part of the Love / Hate relationship. Please try to keep up with your own arguments, Cecelia. It's getting tiresome reminding you of your own words...

    "Puffers" is perfect. That's is mostly what they do, either puffing in horror at the evil of the Bush administration, or puffing on their cannabus. Either way they are just blowing smoke!!

    Posted by: Ceclilia at April 3, 2007 1:31 PM

    Rather be puffing than BushWiping!

    royalking,
    Notice the Kult of Teheran Keith are still silent about the TRON story.
    Notice they have no manswer for as to why their leader sin't discussing the Iran story.

    Also to Keit Kultists,
    O'Reilly interviewed John Kerry last night and was very fair to him. In fact O'Reilly was agreeing with him about Alternative Energy.
    Could you see Olby giving Rudy Giulliani that type of treatment?
    Oh wait, he would even interview Rudy!
    Ha ha ha.
    I bet if he interviewd Ahmadinejad or Bin Laden he would ask loaded questions and great thanks them!

    "The Joker calling someone paranoid?"

    Yes, Olbermann is either paranoid or is just ready to promote any accusations whether real or fake.
    Again you don't say anything about the Tron story or his continued covering up of the Iran story.
    Admitt it he's Far Left propaganda!

    "Puffers" is perfect. That's is mostly what they do, either puffing in horror at the evil of the Bush administration, or puffing on their cannabus. Either way they are just blowing smoke!!

    Posted by: Ceclilia at April 3, 2007 1:31 PM


    The poster here is not to be confused with me--- Cecelia.

    I would never make such a stereotypical statement. I couldn't care less whether anyone puffs on cannabis or not (I do not)and know that people of all ideological stripes use grass. In fact pot should be legalized.

    Cecelia,
    "In fact pot should be legalized."

    I agree with you!

    Dave = Ceclilia = roylaking = Granie = King-Internet

    Olbyloons at play.

    Posted by: johnny dollar at April 3, 2007 2:06 PM


    Well, I wish he'd get his big stinky feet out of my Anne Kleins.

    I still don't mind comments on my rear.

    Posted by: Ceclilia at April 3, 2007 1:17 PM


    Well, okay, that's true...

    to be fair...

    cee = Little Feechie = Katie Turic

    Posted by: johnny dollar at April 3, 2007 2:16 PM


    Johnny, you're performing a public service here. Keep it up.

    I never said the Iranian hostage situation was not a 'newsworthy' story. I said it was NOT a political story...not yet anyway...and I stand by that opinion.


    Posted by: Mike at April 3, 2007 2:10 PM


    Well, I'm glad you're really to discuss your assertion now, Mike. Why is an action you characterized as being motivated by a desire to embarrass the U.S. and Great Britain-- Bush and Blair respectively, is "not a political story"?

    Also, Olbermann has covered hard news stories on Countdown, many times. What has caused you to think that the show only covers "political storiies"?

    "I worried that some people may have hurt feelings."

    Why, let the stricken deer go weep, The hart ungalled play; For some must watch, while some must sleep: So runs the world away.

    Ah yes, lest I forget...You're a douchbag.

    Posted by: Ceclilia at April 3, 2007 12:57 PM


    My god! David is posting as Dave and as Ceclilia answering himself.

    It such a window on the soul of the sort of people who play this game.

    They put the worst words in the mouths of their opponents and then act like they are better people for not having uttered the words they wrote in the first place!

    I never said the Iranian hostage situation was not a 'newsworthy' story. I said it was NOT a political story...not yet anyway...and I stand by that opinion.


    Posted by: Mike at April 3, 2007 2:10 PM

    Mike is such an obvious apologist for Olbermann it is sickening. So let me get his logic. Olbermann spikes a story about Iran taking British hostages because it is not a political story but attempts to run a story run by left wing blogs about Tron being pulled from video shelves. That makes sense. Mike you could write for Olbermann. You use the same backward logic he does.

    Cecilai,
    I bet Dave/David/Fake Cecilia is MRS Philby/Rudy Ramirez!

    > Johnny, you're performing a public service here. Keep it up.

    That J$ with no link in the name wasn't me. It was Manny = Capitalist pigdog = Cecellia = Obamarama = cee = several others. This Einstein has the distinction of changing his handle EVERY time he posts. Never twice the same name.

    I am beginning to wonder if there aren't only really about 3 unique ip addresses on this whole site. Maybe I've just been having a conversation with myself. No wonder the dialogue is a bit better than usual.

    Posted by: Cecellia at April 3, 2007 3:47 PM


    There's some insight, Dave. Are the meds starting to kick in now?

    O'Reilly even defended the billionaire and the jigalow over asking people to conserve energy while they live in mansions and fly in private jets. I wish O’Reilly would had asked Theraza why she moved her ketups factory out of the US to a county with no unions? I would have liked to see Herman Munster and Lilly Munster wiggle out of that one

    This Einstein has the distinction of changing his handle EVERY time he posts. Never twice the same name.

    Posted by: johnny dollar at April 3, 2007 3:54 PM


    It's a kid trying to knock over the board game when they get behind.

    Would you please ban me already? This is getting really tiresome but I don't believe in telling the enemy I am going to give up. If you don't ban me soon I will pull out and go heckle some other obsessionists.

    Posted by: Consistent Name at April 3, 2007 3:57 PM


    Sincerest form of flattery, my friend.

    You know who handed you your butt once or twice.

    Not to help you guys out because I agree with only about 30% of what you say, but really, if I had a site called Olbermannwatch and then a site called AlanHickerson's weird fansite beat me to this little story I would be pretty embarrassed at my incompetence:

    http://hallospacegirl.proboards27.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=1174150998&page=4

    You can thank me by trying to live in reality for a few hours.

    Posted by: Obamarama at April 3, 2007 3:43 PM

    huh?

    (Sweet Jesus, Alan Rickman is an old fart.)

    I have had MSNBC on all morning and they will not shut up about Rosie Odonnell and her comments about the FACT that fire in a building has never in the history of iron framed buildings caused collapse of such a building. Let alone a perfect implosion of a building as building #7 did.

    This is such a sensitive subject that the powers that be - corporate powers - that they are pulling their ace in the hole - the Bush hating MSNBC to ridicule Rosie many more time than Fox does. Yes Oreilly and Hannity have made this an issue but Fox News has left it alone when you compare how much MSNBC is attacking her.

    One more indication that this page and all of its yahooz have no clue how deceptive US media is. MSNBC and CNN are deceptively pro Bush Cheney. This makes them worse in my book than the Klu Klux Klan minded Fox News.

    US media is 100% pure bullsh-t. MSNBC may play it's role very well but it is a role identical to FOX, one of deception. I like any media that takes a stand against the culture of the Klan but it ends their. MSNBC is just the other side of the same coin.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5akpnIFK-RM

    Factor, I see you were questioning "my logic' above at 3:58.

    You know that is REALLY hallarious coming from someone who has twice asserted that O'Reilly's giving away a "free copy of his book" to the troops actually constitutes 'helping' them.....LOL

    Maybe they could at least burn it to keep warm, that is if it wasn't already Springtime.

    Factor, I see you were questioning "my logic' above at 3:58.

    You know that is REALLY hallarious coming from someone who has twice asserted that O'Reilly's giving away a "free copy of his book" to the troops actually constitutes 'helping' them.....LOL

    Maybe they could at least burn it to keep warm, that is if it wasn't already Springtime.


    Posted by: Mike at April 3, 2007 4:32 PM
    I'm pretty sure everyone here has questioned your logic, of which, even you have no answer for.

    It's my prerogative to sit in my basement and pretend I wear fashionable clothes.

    Posted by: Cecelia at April 3, 2007 4:08 PM


    Well, that narrows the gender down to male. Anne Klein is moderately priced and non-trendy.

    Nah...don't ban him. If he says something intelligent fine, if he says something noninteligent, we all know it's the troll. Just sit back and read my highlights... :D

    RoyalKing: "I'm pretty sure everyone here has questioned your logic:

    This, coming from a moron....as well as a serial liar!

    You know that is REALLY hallarious coming from someone who has twice asserted that O'Reilly's giving away a "free copy of his book" to the troops actually constitutes 'helping' them.....LOL Mike


    More lies by Mike. I only once said that O'Reilly is giving his book to troops. I also said he gives money to the wounded warrior foundation and encourages others to do so. He has also visited Walter Reed and Iraq. Has Olbermann? Since many troops watch his show and read his book, I would suggest that it is very kind of O'Reilly to give them a free-signed book. People like reading best selling novels hence they are best selling novels. People don't like reading crap like Olbermann barfs out. That is why no one buys his book. Mike please explain to me exactly what Olbermann is doing for the troops?
    Now that I have destroyed Mike, I have picked the two WPIW for tonight. Paula Zhan in a surprise and Patriot Rush Limbaugh. Paula Zhan because she is questioning Obamanation’s church and she is in Olbermann's time slot. Patriot Rush Limbaugh because he dared questioning why Al Gore is up for the TNT award. Both were on propaganda site "Media Matters".

    Cecelia = noninteligent

    The Olbyloons are now resorting to posting nonsence since Teheran Keith keeps being exposed as a fraud. He spikes the Iran story and almost ran with a prank about TRON because it was on a Far-Left website.
    He's a fraud!

    Coward Watch,
    You're a fraud too!
    How was Friday prayers at your Mosque.

    Cecelia = noninteligent

    Posted by: at April 3, 2007 5:22 PM
    You should spell correctly when resorting to childish name calling.

    First you get mad at what Keith says...

    Then you get mad at what Keith doesn't say...

    Then you get mad because of the guests Keith has on...

    Then you get mad because of the guests Keith doesn't have on...

    Then you get mad at the questions Keith asks...

    Then you get mad at the questions Keith doesn't ask...

    Then you get mad because of a story Keith is going to run...

    Then you get mad because Keith doesn't run the story...

    Then you get mad at Keith for talking politics...

    Then you get mad at Keith for not talking politics...

    Then you get mad at Keith for not nominating himself WPITW...

    Then you get mad at Keith for nominating himself WPITW...

    Then you get mad at Keith for wearing Ashley Banfield's Glasses...

    Then you get mad at Keith for not wearing Ashley Banfield's Glasses...

    The you get mad at Keith for appearing as though his contract will not get renewed...

    Then you get mad at Keith for getting his contract renewed...

    Then you get mad at Keith for getting good ratings...

    Then you get mad at Keith for not getting good ratings...

    Then Keith is a skilled propaganda artist...

    Then Keith is so obviously slanted anyone can figure it out...

    You just want to have your Keith and eat him too. Especially you, Cecelia...

    You sound like a bunch of whiney kids who, after finding out the world just isn't the way they like it, can't even get their imaginary friends to play with them.

    Surprise, surpeise, the puffers finally run a story on Iran. Better late than never.

    Cecelia = noninteligent

    Posted by: at April 3, 2007 5:22 PM
    You should spell correctly when resorting to childish name calling.
    Posted by: royalking at April 3, 2007 5:51 PM

    Tell it Cecelia, Horse Whisperer:

    Nah...don't ban him. If he says something intelligent fine, if he says something noninteligent, we all know it's the troll. Just sit back and read my highlights... :D
    Posted by: Cecelia at April 3, 2007 4:44 PM

    Cecelia = noninteligent

    Posted by: at April 3, 2007 5:22 PM
    You should spell correctly when resorting to childish name calling.
    Posted by: royalking at April 3, 2007 5:51 PM

    Classic, this from the guy that couldn't spell imbececelia when he was calling someone an imbececelia!

    You should spell correctly when resorting to childish name calling.
    Posted by: royalking at April 3, 2007 5:51 PM

    How do you spell hypocrite Jeff?

    Er, I mean imbecile?

    You sound like a bunch of whiney kids who, after finding out the world just isn't the way they like it, can't even get their imaginary friends to play with them.


    Posted by: at April 3, 2007 5:56 PM
    Who's whining? Sounds like you are. waa, waa.

    What insightful mockery you lefty rubes come up with. Let me 'splain it to your sad little liberal minds once again. Keith Olbermann is an evil, narcisistic little man who isn't worth the time of day. I know that doesn't bother you because you yourselves are so evil and narcisitic and liberal that you can't see it. But it does bother me. A lot. Enough to sit online hour after hour explaining how dumb people who don't feel this seething obsession are. So there. Will I be here at 1 am? You bet your ass, sweety. Will I be here tomorrow? You better believe it. I don't care how many fake posters I have to respond to, how many times I am left talking to myself like a babbling angry fool, I will be back, again and again and again. Do you hear me? I'm mad as hell and I'm not gonna take it anymore, sweety.

    Ahhrhhrrrhrhhggggg! Sweety!

    Opps. I meant to simply say "I'm better than you, and I like bush so nya nya."

    Posted by: Cecelia at April 3, 2007 5:33 PM

    Oh YOU'RE not angry....eh..."sweety"...

    I've never made blanket statements about liberals, let alone that they are all narcissistic or evil.


    I've never tried to hack a website or someone's computer.

    I've never gone to an opposition blogboard and trolled or stolen identities.

    I've never tried to stick pejoratives words in people's mouth using their screen name.


    Oh you're not angry....or powerless and frustrated.... :D

    See what I mean. These games are a window to your soul.

    Jeff the Hypocrite Act I:

    Can any olbyloon explain why when they loose a debate they go back and do grammar checks to find typo's? Does Ulbermahn tell you to do that in your dreams?
    Posted by: jeff at March 15, 2007 12:37 PM

    Jeff the Hypocrite Act II:

    You should spell correctly when resorting to childish name calling.
    Posted by: royalking at April 3, 2007 5:51 PM


    So, am I calling you a hyprocrite for telling someone to learn how to spell, after you've repeatedly chastized others doing the same thing...

    Or am I calling you a hypocrite for telling me I'm resorting to 'childish name calling' when you childlishly call anyone who doesn't parrot your point of a view an Olbyloon?

    I guess you get the Double-Hypocrite award!

    It's a very special honor Jeff, wear it with pride, I know you will!

    I'm ready for my "closeup" Mr. Olberman.

    Posted by: Cecelia at April 3, 2007 6:08 PM


    So I'm YOUR Olbermann, huh? :D

    And I'm not even on tv...

    ...But it is entirely consistent, rational, and a good expenditure of time, since people pay attention to us...

    Just keep telling yourself that...

    As long as you have yourself convinced, that's all that really matters...

    ...But it is entirely consistent, rational, and a good expenditure of time, since people pay attention to us...

    Just keep telling yourself that...

    As long as you have yourself convinced, that's all that really matters...

    Posted by: at April 3, 2007 6:15 PM


    YOU'VE convinced us...

    ...But it is entirely consistent, rational, and a good expenditure of time, since people pay attention to us...

    If you didn't actually write that, Cecelia, my mistake. But you have to admit, it does sound like something you might say with defensive justification.

    The second part of the post WAS a little weird, but you have become a little punch drunk the last few days. I was just gonna let it go.

    How about this one. I've never bothered to address someone who is mindlessly floundering about on a website faking names and so forth in the name of nothing but stupidity. How about that, Ms. Squeekety squeek.

    Posted by: Consistent Name at April 3, 2007 6:18 PM
    Does Rosie know she has a long lost brother? You should tell her.

    Is Mikey here somewhere?

    Jeff's having peyote flashbacks

    Whoooopdef---ingdoo. You are just so darned ethical, Ms. Nicety Nice. My god, call the cops, someone has besmirched your precious namesake. What if all your conservobot fans get confused? Does not compute!! McCain has no black baby!! Ahrrrg I'm meeeeellllllting.

    How about this one. I've never bothered to address someone who is mindlessly floundering about on a website faking names and so forth in the name of nothing but stupidity. How about that, Ms. Squeekety squeek.

    Posted by: Consistent Name at April 3, 2007 6:18 PM


    Are you kidding. You've been writing and answering yourself all day.

    You haven't bemirsched my name. Who, as in ...what.... you are is so apparent that the breadcrumbs to your soul are the size of canned hams.

    Who can blame you for not using your own name.

    Well the sun shines on a dogs butt!! So you're starting to get it are you, thicky? Jeez you people have all the sense of humor of Jerry Lewis or Monty Python or some other liberal traitor non-Iran-invading bedwetter.

    Posted by: at April 3, 2007 6:24 PM

    Bingo!

    I've never confused Olbermann or his stuff with YOU...

    But we're all "you people"....the collective Karl Roves.... That's why you put all that "liberals are evil stuff in my mouth"... projection.

    In case you didn't know, lil mikey, there is a difference between a typo and a mis-spelling. lil mikey, I brought up the spelling because the "anon" called Cecelia unintelligent and spelled it "uninteligent," typical olbyloon, leaving out half the story. Since you are too drunk to understand, I mis-spelled imbecile wrong purposely for effect you IMBOCILE! Oh, I almost forgot, you're a coward, too. Now, get lost, mrs. "non-political!"

    "breadcrumbs to your soul"

    Is that the same as 'The Hairway to Steven?'

    Toooooooot tooot!!! I'm real! I'm real! Look at me! I'm on the internets saying the smarts!!!

    Posted by: at April 3, 2007 6:29 PM


    Yes, we see your canned hams.

    Actually Jeff, since you have trouble reading and retaining information, I'll spell it all out for you. You'll forget immediately, but that's okay, you can at least say, 'I used to know...'

    Cecelia spelled unintelligent without the double 'L' in her post.

    I merely made a post using her words to make a point...

    You've gone on to prove you are a double-hypocrite, and I thank you for that. You can't even spell words correctly on purpose, you expect me to believe you actually misspelled a word on purpose?

    Yeah, I guess you are right about one thing, typical olbyloon, trying to use people's words against them. Don't you just hate it when your own words come back to bite you on the ass. There is one way to fix that...stop talking! Good thing for me you won't!

    >In case you didn't know, lil mikey, there is a difference between a typo and a mis-spelling.

    But you forgot the one thing they have in common, Jeff......YOU!

    ...And I'm not Mikey...

    ...Better run along now, I think your mare's in heat...

    Jeff tried 'artificial' insemination with his horses once....He didn't like it.

    He didn't find it quite as enjoyable and he was pretty sure the horses didn't like it as much either...

    >But we're all "you people"....the collective Karl Roves.... That's why you put all that "liberals are evil stuff in my mouth"... projection.
    Posted by: Cecelia at April 3, 2007 6:31 PM

    Uh, Cecelia, do I have to copy and paste all the times you've used the term 'You people....' when referring to people you disagree with just to give you a little reminder.

    Mrs. Pot meet Mr. Kettle...

    Jeff is really fun to play with...because he's a moron, or course!

    I've found I don't even have to participate on this blog in order to....well, participate!

    The last ACTUAL post I made before this one was at 4:53, but according to Jeff, I've been lurking and posted here several times since then.

    Jeff...what does it feel like to not have a brain?

    lil mikey has another "anon" defender that reposts posts that were made by me addressing him, he says it's not him, pretty pathetic, to say the least. lil mikey, from now on, I am treating you like the great O'Reilly treats Ulbermahn, no response! Get lost lunatic psycho olbyloon.

    Uh, Cecelia, do I have to copy and paste all the times you've used the term 'You people....' when referring to people you disagree with just to give you a little reminder.

    Mrs. Pot meet Mr. Kettle...

    Posted by: at April 3, 2007 6:56 PM


    When I say "you people" I mean the two or three, etc people I'm arguing with at the time.

    I'm convinced that if you happen to have a milisecond discomforture over using someone else's screen name, all you do is simply say to yourself, "Don't worry about it. She stole the election, made the Willie Horton ad, and bankrolled Paula Jones"...

    You wrote a script for people who don't like Keith Olbermann a long time ago.

    Mrs. Pot meet Mr. Kettle...

    Posted by: at April 3, 2007 6:56 PM


    BTW-- Whose words have been put in your mouth?

    Are you kidding. You've been writing and answering yourself all day.

    You haven't bemirsched my name. Who, as in ...what.... you are is so apparent that the breadcrumbs to your soul are the size of canned hams.

    Who can blame you for not using your own name.

    Posted by: Cecelia at April 3, 2007 6:26 PM
    Sounds like another certain olbyloon that lurks here 24/7 claiming to "peek" in once in a while..ha ha ha ha lmao.

    "Jeff...what does it feel like to not have a brain?"

    Well if he had one:

    He would not be just a nuffin'
    His head all full of stuffin'
    His heart all full of pain.
    He would dance and be merry
    Life would be a ding-a-derry
    If He only had a brain

    When I say "you people" I mean the two or three, etc people I'm arguing with at the time.
    Posted by: Cecelia at April 3, 2007 7:43 PM

    First of all, I'm not the person using other people's names.

    Secondly, when you last used the 'you people' broad stroke you were only arguing with me at the time, not two or three people.

    Thirdly, why should we buy your convenient explanation of your use of the phrase 'you people' when you aren't willing to extend the same benefit to those you are arguing with?

    Beginning to see a pattern? Yeah, us too.

    Cecelia is right, the rest of the world is wrong. No matter how much she tries to spin it.

    Cecelia likes to use 'Selective Reasoning.'

    She continually paints herself into corners while debating then slips out the back with some convenient explanation when people try to get her to own up to her words.

    "No, when I say that, it's different than when OTHER people say it!"

    "No, I wasn't talking about line 4 when I wrote line 5, I was talking about line 3!"

    Then, when you get a 3,000 foot view of Cecelia's 'arguments' all you see is a series of rooms with corners left unpainted.

    Secondly, when you last used the 'you people' broad stroke you were only arguing with me at the time, not two or three people.

    Thirdly, why should we buy your convenient explanation of your use of the phrase 'you people' when you aren't willing to extend the same benefit to those you are arguing with?

    Beginning to see a pattern? Yeah, us too.

    Cecelia is right, the rest of the world is wrong. No matter how much she tries to spin it.

    Posted by: at April 3, 2007 7:50 PM


    For the sake of argument, let's say I used "you people" everytime I addressed. Who would I mean?

    You could say I meant everyone who like Keith Olbermann but there are some people here who like Keith Olbermann and happen to agree with whatever particular criticism I'm making about him.

    Do I mean everyone who is against the war? There are people who don't like Olbermann and have grave doubts about the wisdom of the war.

    No, even if I said "you people" everytime I address ANY opponent, it would still be impersonal. I'm not putting words you've never uttered in your life under your name and mentioning opposition calls against McCain in '00 while I'm justifying it.

    You have more canned hams than Kroger. :D

    I "junked" all those comments coming from 68.245.76.84 under other people's names. And I am banning that IP address.

    In case you are interested here is the recent activity from that OlbyLoon. I have no good way to make the text display as a table so you just have to scroll through it as best you can. As you can see this person has been a busy beaver...

    Status Comment Commenter Entry Date
    Published to be fair... cee = Little Feechie = Katie Turic johnny dollar Countdown with Keith Olbe... 5 hours, 39 minutes ago
    Published OMG, did anyone see Keith last night? He bellowed the opening spiel in his typical fashion... Capitalist pigdog Countdown with Keith Olbe... 5 hours, 34 minutes ago
    Published I saw that! Then it led with Matthew Dowd's unfavorable comments about "Mister" Bush. What... [Anonymous] Countdown with Keith Olbe... 5 hours, 33 minutes ago
    Published You guys said it! Plus McCain, a "special guest" who's running for President (guess which ... [Anonymous] Countdown with Keith Olbe... 5 hours, 31 minutes ago
    Published After that I got the idea that there are still several dogs who won't be permitted to bark... Manny Countdown with Keith Olbe... 5 hours, 29 minutes ago
    Published I couldn't believe it when I saw the latest partisan politico to be given a blue-dress int... cee Countdown with Keith Olbe... 5 hours, 25 minutes ago
    Published Not to help you guys out because I agree with only about 30% of what you say, but really, ... Obamarama Countdown with Keith Olbe... 4 hours, 11 minutes ago
    Published I am beginning to wonder if there aren't only really about 3 unique ip addresses on this w... Cecellia Countdown with Keith Olbe... 4 hours, 8 minutes ago
    Published Leftwing hippie chicks are ugly and can't get boyfriends!! The liberal males are not real ... Laura MacPherson Countdown with Keith Olbe... 4 hours ago
    Published Would you please ban me already? This is getting really tiresome but I don't believe in te... Consistent Name Countdown with Keith Olbe... 3 hours, 57 minutes ago
    Published You are a real headcase buddy-boy. We'll be laughing at you all the way up to our usual 1:... Cecelia Countdown with Keith Olbe... 3 hours, 55 minutes ago
    Published I do not hang out on Olbermanwatch at 1:30am. Cecelia Countdown with Keith Olbe... 3 hours, 53 minutes ago
    Published Initiating ejection sequence.... johnny dollar Countdown with Keith Olbe... 3 hours, 50 minutes ago
    Published "It's a kid trying to knock over the board game when they get behind." I know, myself. We... Cecelia Countdown with Keith Olbe... 3 hours, 47 minutes ago
    Published The only basement I frequent is Filene's, sweetie. Say good night gracie! J$ is taking you... Cecelia Countdown with Keith Olbe... 3 hours, 44 minutes ago
    Published To reiterate for the confused, here are my exchanges that brought this little kindergarten... Cecelia Countdown with Keith Olbe... 3 hours, 38 minutes ago
    Published 194.363.4.69 Banned for life. Another troll slaying brought to you by your humble champion... johnny dollar Countdown with Keith Olbe... 3 hours, 34 minutes ago
    Published Where one is slain, a hundred will rise to take his place. Behold the power of Consistent ... Consistent Name Countdown with Keith Olbe... 3 hours, 31 minutes ago
    Published Sorry, I botched the link. It should have gone to the previous page. The same story is her... Obamarama Countdown with Keith Olbe... 3 hours, 26 minutes ago
    Published Get a hold of this troll and toss his ass out like NOW. If you are going to run an "opposi... Capitalist pigdog Countdown with Keith Olbe... 3 hours, 22 minutes ago
    Published "I'm far easier to please than Janet, Bob." I hope so. That harpie rides me like a circus... Robert Cox Great Moments in Broadcas... 3 hours, 16 minutes ago
    Published Olberman nailed again!!! Kudos Oh great one! I caught me an Olby-fart right here: http://m... Dingster Great Moments in Broadcas... 3 hours, 13 minutes ago
    Published That's legit Dingster. I'll add it to the list. In the future when you catch one of those,... Robert Cox Great Moments in Broadcas... 3 hours, 10 minutes ago
    Published Looks like we've got a real clown on our hands. He is switching ip's faster than I can ban... johnny dollar Countdown with Keith Olbe... 3 hours, 3 minutes ago
    Published Well, I'm trying an approach where his new IP will only see a non-updating version of the ... johnny dollar Countdown with Keith Olbe... 2 hours, 56 minutes ago
    Published What the ?#@!@ is wrong with the site? Hellooooooooo???? Damn you Johnny Dollar, you have ... Consistent Name Countdown with Keith Olbe... 2 hours, 50 minutes ago
    Published Bingo!! Now we can all go on talking and thinking about Olbermann unmolested. I'll go fir... johnny dollar Countdown with Keith Olbe... 2 hours, 47 minutes ago
    Published I don't like him because he says nasty things!! Ohhhh. I feel tingly again. Orenthal Countdown with Keith Olbe... 2 hours, 45 minutes ago
    Published Har dee har har. What insightful mockery you lefty rubes come up with. Let me 'splain it ... Cecelia Countdown with Keith Olbe... 2 hours, 22 minutes ago
    Published Typical leftwing kook nonsense. We object to Olberman, yes. But it is entirely consistent,... Cecelia Countdown with Keith Olbe... 1 hour, 47 minutes ago
    Published "I've never tried to hack a website or someone's computer." OMG seriously? Because you re... Consistent Name Countdown with Keith Olbe... 1 hour, 36 minutes ago
    Published "So I'm YOUR Olbermann, huh? :D And I'm not even on tv..." Well the sun shines on a dogs... [Anonymous] Countdown with Keith Olbe... 1 hour, 31 minutes ago
    Published "Who can blame you for not using your own name." Me can. That's who. So put that in your ... [Anonymous] Countdown with Keith Olbe... 1 hour, 25 minutes ago
    33 result(s) found.

    Version 3.33 Copyright © 2001-2006 Six Apart. All Rights Reserved.

    THE SUPREME COURT REBUKES BUSH ON GLOBAL WARMING !
    The Supreme Court ordered the Environmental Protection Agency on Monday to explain why it has refused to regulate greenhouse gas pollution from cars, putting the Bush administration under pressure from an unusual coalition of environmental groups and leaders of the auto industry to move quickly on global warming.

    In a 5-to-4 decision, the court rejected the administration's argument that it had no legal authority to limit carbon dioxide released from new cars. In a ruling described as a landmark victory for environmental activists, it decided that the EPA does have such authority and that it must give better reasons for not using it than the "laundry list" of "impermissible considerations" it has offered until now.

    This ruling not only puts Bush in his place, but also the neanderthal thinkers like Cecilia and her wrong headed crew of wingnuts.

    I wonder if jeff is still boycotting the best movies, TV shows and musical acts b/c his right wing blogs recommend it.
    Could there be anyone more delusional than Jeff !

    This ruling not only puts Bush in his place, but also the neanderthal thinkers like Cecilia and her wrong headed crew of wingnuts.


    Posted by: Bob at April 3, 2007 8:05 PM


    Chucky!

    This ruling not only puts Bush in his place, but also the neanderthal thinkers like Cecilia and her wrong headed crew of wingnuts.


    Posted by: Bob at April 3, 2007 8:05 PM
    boob, hate to break it too ya, this isn't the puffington post, this is olbermann watch. Speaking of movies, did you mail your copy of "Tron" to President Bush? He wants 'em all back.

    Did olby call in sick today for "softball?" Isn't he supposed to hide under Mathews' desk and wipe the slobber off his chin and lips in between takes? How embarrasing, the spit and sh-t is flying today. You wouldn't know their is an Iran hostage situation by watching slobber face and slippery schuster.

    This ruling not only puts Bush in his place, but also the neanderthal thinkers like Cecilia and her wrong headed crew of wingnuts.


    Posted by: Bob at April 3, 2007 8:05 PM


    I hate to break it to you, Chucks, but I have never doubted that the EPA had the authority to regulate carbon emissions.

    I have my doubts about the way your news story makes it sound like the S.C. is making the E.P.A. account for not regulating them rather than telling the agency that the reason it gave is incorrect and that it must account for not regulating them in some other way.

    I just came on a while back and read the doings here today.

    First, if I understand what happened correctly at least one of the asses who has been hijacking names and using multiple names has been banned using his IP address.

    What is an IP address? Can one get another one? Easily?

    What would motivate such maliciously obnoxious behavior towards people that you don't even know? Makes one hope that one never comes in contact with them in a lonely place with no help or witnesses unless loaded for bear.

    Grammie

    At any rate, GREAT THANKS!

    >No, even if I said "you people" everytime I address ANY opponent, it would still be impersonal. I'm not putting words you've never uttered in your life under your name and mentioning opposition calls against McCain in '00 while I'm justifying it.

    You have more canned hams than Kroger. :D
    Posted by: Cecelia at April 3, 2007 8:04 PM

    You must have missed:

    First of all, I'm not the person using other people's names.

    Furthermore:

    You can justify using the term 'you people' all you want. You can explain what you meant or didn't mean, but in the end calling someone out for doing the same thing is exactly how I called it:

    Mrs. Pot meet Mr. Kettle...

    What would motivate such maliciously obnoxious behavior towards people that you don't even know? Makes one hope that one never comes in contact with them in a lonely place with no help or witnesses unless loaded for bear.

    Grammie

    At any rate, GREAT THANKS!

    Posted by: Janet Hawkins at April 3, 2007 8:37 PM


    If that's really you, Grammie, name your, your late husband's, and my favorite bird.... :D

    OO, OO, OO. I know! I know!

    Chubby Hubby and Grey Goose.

    In fact, this development calls for some on the rocks in celebration.

    Grammie

    That would be 'Chubby Hubby' and the Parrot.

    First of all, I'm not the person using other people's names.

    Furthermore:

    You can justify using the term 'you people' all you want. You can explain what you meant or didn't mean, but in the end calling someone out for doing the same thing is exactly how I called it:

    Mrs. Pot meet Mr. Kettle...

    Posted by: at April 3, 2007 8:41 PM


    Who's justifying anything? I was pointing out the vast difference between any use of "you people" -- your charge.... with putting direct words into people's mouth-- my charge.

    As for who you are and how many ISPs you have. Who knows.

    If anything this manifestation of OlbermannWatch is even more banal and pointless than the old dead one. Adios, morons.

    Ahhhhhhh, isn't Chicken Blogger so cute and ORIGNAL.

    I have only been associated with 'parrot' about 49,999 times at OW. You are lucky you make only 50,000. Otherwise I would have to chastise you for being banal.

    Grammie

    I have my doubts about the way your news story makes it sound like the S.C. is making the E.P.A. account for not regulating them rather than telling the agency that the reason it gave is incorrect and that it must account for not regulating them in some other way.
    Posted by: Cecelia at April 3, 2007 8:27 PM

    Of course you have your doubts about the news story. It's because it's today's news story and all factual.
    The truth is always had for you to swallow.

    "Chubby Hubby and Grey Goose.

    In fact, this development calls for some on the rocks in celebration.

    Grammie"

    To the late Mr. Chubby Hubby and to Mrs. Chubby Hubby. Cheers!

    Oh cool, bob is back. One of the few sane people to post here.

    "hard" to swallow.

    >Who's justifying anything?

    You are:

    For the sake of argument, let's say I used "you people" everytime I addressed. Who would I mean?

    You could say I meant everyone who like Keith Olbermann but there are some people here who like Keith Olbermann and happen to agree with whatever particular criticism I'm making about him.

    Do I mean everyone who is against the war? There are people who don't like Olbermann and have grave doubts about the wisdom of the war.

    No, even if I said "you people" everytime I address ANY opponent, it would still be impersonal. I'm not putting words you've never uttered in your life under your name and mentioning opposition calls against McCain in '00 while I'm justifying it. while I'm justifying it. while I'm justifying it. while I'm justifying it.


    >Who's justifying anything? I was pointing out the vast difference between any use of "you people" -- your charge.... with putting direct words into people's mouth-- my charge.

    Yeah, you can change the debate. You can point out the vast difference of a square and a circle, but how about explaining why you would attack someone's use of the term 'you people' while admitting you do it yourself?

    You're pretty good at picking apart other people's words, but when it comes time to take a look at your own, you become stunningly obtuse.

    >As for who you are and how many ISPs you have. Who knows.

    How about who CARES?

    Time for Countdown, you people are real retards.

    >Ahhhhhhh, isn't Chicken Blogger so cute and ORIGNAL.

    I have only been associated with 'parrot' about 49,999 times at OW. You are lucky you make only 50,000. Otherwise I would have to chastise you for being banal.

    Grammie
    Posted by: Janet Hawkins at April 3, 2007 8:52 PM

    Wow, Grammie, not very smart are you. I was naming Cecelia's favorite bird, not yours.

    Cecelia's the Parrot. You come up with all the stupid stuff you say yourself.

    Except for Chicken Blogger...I think you parroted that one...

    I say I think the story makes it look like the S.C. is mandating the EPA to do something about carbon emissions, this is my refutation:

    "Of course you have your doubts about the news story. It's because it's today's news story and all factual.
    The truth is always had for you to swallow.

    Posted by: Bob at April 3, 2007 8:55 PM "

    I say I don't use "you people" to designate the several folks I'm arguing with and that even if I used it in the matter I'm accused of, it would not be personal in the sense of putting direct quotes into someone else's screen name. This is my refution:


    "Yeah, you can change the debate. You can point out the vast difference of a square and a circle, but how about explaining why you would attack someone's use of the term 'you people' while admitting you do it yourself?

    You're pretty good at picking apart other people's words, but when it comes time to take a look at your own, you become stunningly obtuse.

    Posted by: at April 3, 2007 8:57 PM


    You people... (you and Bob) bring such clarity to all matters....

    Cecelia-

    Again, I am NOT the person who was posting under other people's names and I am NOT the person who is putting words in other people's mouths.

    So, if you have a beef with someone who does or did, it's not with me. I stick with debating stuff people DO say, not with what they might say or didn't say.

    Now, you can assign whatever motivation you like to you using the term 'You People.'

    It still does not change the simple fact that you were calling someone out (not me) for saying 'you people' (even going on to day he MUST mean the collective Karl Roves) and then you admit you do it yourself.

    So what do you mean by it when you say it? Dunno. I'm not assigning meaning or motivation. What I am doing is calling you out for being a hypocrite (again.)

    So next time you take someone to task for something, you should probably think about whether you've done the same thing or not.

    ...And even if you can come up with an explanation of how your motivation was DIFFERENT, the act was still the same.

    Clear yet?

    Actually, Chicken Blogger your asessment of your mental prowress far out strips the actuality.

    I happen to know Cecelia's favorite bird is Grey Goose, so your answer was not accurate.

    I, however, am one of the champion acussees of parrot.

    You notice I said 'associated with'. I did not mention Cecelia at all.

    Just a friendly little warning. You are skating very close to the edge of complete banality with the use of 'you people' and 'stupid, and 'parrot' all in one short post.

    I suggest you might become a tad more interesting if you get a new schtick.

    Grammie

    PS Yes, I did take 'Chicken Blogger' from another poster. And at that time, I acknowledged his contribution to accuracy in language and informed him that I would take advantage of his insight.

    Ergo, my designation of you as a Chicken Blogger.

    It's Cecelia's (convoluted) world, We're all just living in it...

    "It still does not change the simple fact that you were calling someone out (not me) for saying 'you people' (even going on to day he MUST mean the collective Karl Roves) and then you admit you do it yourself."


    You need to go reread the discussion. I was NOT calling anyone out for using the designation "you people".

    You need to go reread the discussion. I was NOT calling anyone out for using the designation "you people".

    Posted by: Cecelia at April 3, 2007 9:19 PM


    Sorry, I hit the wrong window.

    in the sense that YOU mean. I was making the point that this person felt they could write a script for me because all conservatives are a collective consciousness.

    RoyalKing/Jeff again: "He says it's not him"

    That's our Jeff again...once again accusing me of making posts I didn't make.

    Do you actually think I need somebody to 'defend' me against YOU? Just how deep does your dellusionment run anyway?

    Jeff, what you don't understand is that EVERYBODY on this board knows you are both a moron AND a liar, whether they say so or not.

    Jeff, are you in Junior High school? If you are, it perfectly explains your unending stream of moronic posts.

    Now Jeff, since you are by nature a LIAR, it stands to reason that you really believe that everybody ELSE is a liar too...but that's where you're wrong.

    Just a friendly little warning. You are skating very close to the edge of complete banality with the use of 'you people' and 'stupid, and 'parrot' all in one short post.
    Posted by: Janet Hawkins at April 3, 2007 9:18 PM

    Hey Grammie- Can you show me where I said 'You people' in my one short post?

    Otherwise I'll have to accuse you of putting words in people's mouth, something your buddy Cecelia despises...

    And yeah, I know the storied history of the term chicken blogger. Like there's anything inherently brave or cowardly about posting on a message board.

    It's Cecelia's (convoluted) world, We're all just living in it...

    Posted by: at April 3, 2007 9:19 PM


    No doubt I'm your world.

    what's that noise? sounds like sh-t coming out of a horses ass......

    Cecelia, I wonder if my Chicken Blogger is the same Chicken Blogger you are currently debating.

    On one hand there is the proximity in time and place. On the other hand, your Chicken is railing at you for using 'you people' while my Chicken is blatantly using 'you people'.

    I think it was Red Wolf whoadded the so descriptive and accurate 'Chicken Blogger' to the lexicon.

    This situation is a perfect model of his insight.

    Grammie

    Now Jeff, since you are by nature a LIAR, it stands to reason that you really believe that everybody ELSE is a liar too...but that's where you're wrong.

    Posted by: Mike at April 3, 2007 9:23 PM


    Mike, do you see the questions I asked you earlier?

    You need to go reread the discussion. I was NOT calling anyone out for using the designation "you people" in the sense that YOU mean. I was making the point that this person felt they could write a script for me because all conservatives are a collective consciousness.

    Posted by: Cecelia at April 3, 2007 9:22 PM

    Yeah Cecelia, I know. He was using the term negatively and You were using the term in a benign fashion. That's what I meant when I said I wasn't the one assigning motivation to anyone's words...like you.

    You were calling out his intentions when he said 'You People' and when I pointed out you've done the exact same thing, you admitted it, but assigned yourself a different motivation.

    You feel he was painting with a broad stroke.

    So, to recap: When someone who is perceived as 'liberal' says 'you people' they must mean all the Karl Rove-ites....And when Cecelia says 'you people' it's just a matter of convenience. After all, she can't be troubled to name everyone she's talking about, can she?

    Uh, Okay got it. I'm convinced...

    Yea I saw them Cecelia. Any more questions?

    Is it just me or does a certain person have a trademark of (among other things) of using all caps in a lot of his words to emRoyalKing/Jeff again: "He says it's not him"

    That's our Jeff again...once again accusing me of making posts I didn't make.

    Do you actually think I need somebody to 'defend' me against YOU? Just how deep does your dellusionment run anyway?

    Jeff, what you don't understand is that EVERYBODY on this board knows you are both a moron AND a liar, whether they say so or not.

    Jeff, are you in Junior High school? If you are, it perfectly explains your unending stream of moronic posts.

    Now Jeff, since you are by nature a LIAR, it stands to reason that you really believe that everybody ELSE is a liar too...but that's where you're wrong.

    Posted by: Mike at April 3, 2007 9:23 PM
    phasize them?Cecelia-

    Again, I am NOT the person who was posting under other people's names and I am NOT the person who is putting words in other people's mouths.

    So, if you have a beef with someone who does or did, it's not with me. I stick with debating stuff people DO say, not with what they might say or didn't say.

    Now, you can assign whatever motivation you like to you using the term 'You People.'

    It still does not change the simple fact that you were calling someone out (not me) for saying 'you people' (even going on to day he MUST mean the collective Karl Roves) and then you admit you do it yourself.

    So what do you mean by it when you say it? Dunno. I'm not assigning meaning or motivation. What I am doing is calling you out for being a hypocrite (again.)

    So next time you take someone to task for something, you should probably think about whether you've done the same thing or not.

    ...And even if you can come up with an explanation of how your motivation was DIFFERENT, the act was still the same.

    Clear yet?

    Posted by: at April 3, 2007 9:16 PM

    This situation is a perfect model of his insight.

    Grammie

    Posted by: Janet Hawkins at April 3, 2007 9:26 PM


    Grammie,

    We've spent the entire day having words assigned to us, why not motivations?... :D

    Hey Grammie- Can you show me where I said 'You people' in my one short post?

    Otherwise I'll have to accuse you of putting words in people's mouth, something your buddy Cecelia despises...

    Yea I saw them Cecelia. Any more questions?

    Posted by: Mike at April 3, 2007 9:32 PM


    Since you feel that Iran wishes to embarrass Blair and Bush, why is the Iran story not "political" in nature?

    >Grammie,
    We've spent the entire day having words assigned to us, why not motivations?... :D
    Posted by: Cecelia at April 3, 2007 9:33 PM

    Actually, I'm still waiting for BOTH of you to justify YOUR OWN WORDS.

    Still Waiting...

    Assertion:

    Just a friendly little warning. You are skating very close to the edge of complete banality with the use of 'you people' and 'stupid, and 'parrot' all in one short post.
    Posted by: Janet Hawkins at April 3, 2007 9:18 PM

    Repudiation:

    Hey Grammie- Can you show me where I said 'You people' in my one short post?

    Otherwise I'll have to accuse you of putting words in people's mouth, something your buddy Cecelia despises...

    Response:

    ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

    Actually, I'm still waiting for BOTH of you to justify YOUR OWN WORDS.

    Still Waiting...

    Posted by: at April 3, 2007 9:36 PM


    No prolbem. I use "you people" on blogboards as I used it with you and Bob.

    If I have come across as being "you people" as in blanket assertions against Olbermann fans or liberals in general, that was not my intent. Sorry, I was more clear and I'll be more careful in the future.

    Grammie,

    at says she ain't the same "at" that we saw earlier and that you should know that she ain't the same "at".

    Can you do your mea culpa for "at".

    >Cecelia, I wonder if my Chicken Blogger is the same Chicken Blogger you are currently debating.

    On one hand there is the proximity in time and place. On the other hand, your Chicken is railing at you for using 'you people' while my Chicken is blatantly using 'you people'.

    I think it was Red Wolf whoadded the so descriptive and accurate 'Chicken Blogger' to the lexicon.

    This situation is a perfect model of his insight.

    Grammie
    Posted by: Janet Hawkins at April 3, 2007 9:26 PM

    Where's the blatant use of 'you people' by an anonymous poster you are debating Grammie?

    And yeah, hitch your wagon to Red Wolf, he's the one that used the term 'Buttf---' too.

    So insightful in your old age...

    And on such high ground too...

    "Hey Grammie- Can you show me where I said 'You people' in my one short post?"

    You are absolutely correct. You ONLY used 'stupid' and 'parrot' in that one short post.

    What better illustration of the dangers of being a Chicken Blogger, not only for you but also your readers.

    If you have ever been in a chicken yard you might understand this better. They are all in a frenzy, running around clucking, pecking and crapping. It is a good analogy to the aspect of individuals trying to distinguish which chicken clucked and crapped as opposed to any other chicken.

    I have to change my asessment. You are only perilously close to total banality. If, that is, you are a different chicken from the chicken who has been clucking 'you people' over and over for months and months.

    Grammie

    Grammie is probably watching Olbermann, at.

    YOu are the same "at" aren't you?

    "If you have ever been in a chicken yard you might understand this better. They are all in a frenzy, running around clucking, pecking and crapping. It is a good analogy to the aspect of individuals trying to distinguish which chicken clucked and crapped as opposed to any other chicken."

    Well, Anonymity has it's benefits, Grammie. As does posting under other's screen names.

    It's my world they just want to complain anonymously in it....

    Since you feel that Iran wishes to embarrass Blair and Bush, why is the Iran story not "political" in nature?

    Posted by: Cecelia at April 3, 2007 9:35 PM
    Cecelia, a certain person (imbOcile) had no answer the other day, do you think he'll have an answer today? Since he gets his news from tehran keith, he probabaly knows nothing about it.

    >Grammie,
    at says she ain't the same "at" that we saw earlier and that you should know that she ain't the same "at". Can you do your mea culpa for "at".
    Posted by: Cecelia at April 3, 2007 9:43 PM

    I never once even so much as inferred that you SHOULD know I am a different poster than someone else. I actually took the time to tell you, repeatedly, so you would not make that mistake. But, apparently, you did anyway.

    Dozens of people post here without assigning a name. I can't take credit for all their brilliance, nor can I take the blame for all their ignorance.

    You'll just have to take me for what I am saying right here and right now. Which is the beauty of the no-name post.

    No pigeon-holing, no assumptions, no prejudice.

    You only have my words to judge me.

    But don't say I said something I didn't...like saying 'you people' in a post with 'parrot' and 'stupid.' When I say stupid parrot, the stupid parrots know who I am talking about!

    "If you have ever been in a chicken yard you might understand this better. They are all in a frenzy, running around clucking, pecking and crapping. It is a good analogy to the aspect of individuals trying to distinguish which chicken clucked and crapped as opposed to any other chicken."


    Grammie, that's perilously close to making chicken bloggers into "you people"....

    The devil is in those details but getting into that concept would be the triumph of hope over experience...

    You'll just have to take me for what I am saying right here and right now. Which is the beauty of the no-name post.

    No pigeon-holing, no assumptions, no prejudice.

    You only have my words to judge me.

    But don't say I said something I didn't...like saying 'you people' in a post with 'parrot' and 'stupid.' When I say stupid parrot, the stupid parrots know who I am talking about!

    Posted by: at April 3, 2007 9:53 PM
    one word-coward

    >Well, Anonymity has it's benefits, Grammie. As does posting under other's screen names.

    ...And just to be clear...I never posted under someone else's screen name. Not that you're saying I did, I just want it known.

    'You People' (Grammie and Cecelia) have a hard enough time with the posts you DO make yourself....

    "he gets his news from Teheran Keith"

    Hey - don't forget Al Jazeera!

    "Where's the blatant use of 'you people' by an anonymous poster you are debating Grammie?"

    I feel like Harry Higgins rejoicing," My God, she's got it".

    That is the point I raised, you should know. How do you expect others to distinguish between your clucking and crapping and any chicken clucking and crapping.

    Grammie

    When I say stupid parrot, the stupid parrots know who I am talking about!

    Posted by: at April 3, 2007 9:53 PM

    Oh yeah. It's all the "at"s that get difficult.

    We've learned something here... go in peace, wise at

    You are the same "at"?

    Jeff: "one word-coward"

    Jeff thinks courage lies in signing a name to a still anonymous post.

    Wouldn't it be funny to see this fool on the front lines...and then let's see if his definition of a 'coward' changes a little?

    Hey - don't forget Al Jazeera!

    Posted by: Mike at April 3, 2007 9:57 PM


    Mike, you said Keith had an agenda. What do you mean?

    to spread lies and left wing propaganda

    "Hey - don't for get Al Jazeera"

    And lets not forget CNN (Communist News Network) either!

    is that horses ass sill babbling and avoiding questions?

    one word-coward
    Posted by: royalking at April 3, 2007 9:56 PM

    Yes Jeff, I am afraid.

    As I should be of someone who spends as much time with horses as you do.....

    So, what is it about horses you like so much?

    Oh, I know...they may say NEEIIGGH but they never say No...

    "you said Keith had an agenda"

    Well, for one thing, I heard he's put himself on a strict diet after calling himself a "fat ass".

    Mike, we are still waiting for an answer to the logical extension of your statement that KO has an agenda.

    What agenda do you perceive.

    Grammie

    chick-chick-chicken haaaaawk!

    give mike a chance, he's posing as 2 people right now.

    Well, for one thing, I heard he's put himself on a strict diet after calling himself a "fat ass".

    Posted by: Mike at April 3, 2007 10:08 PM

    That's hard news so you couldn't have heard it on Countdown.

    10:08 to Jeff: "So, what is it about horses you like so much"

    Are you kidding? You've obviously never an aroused stud horse, have you?

    Yea I saw them Cecelia. Any more questions?

    Posted by: Mike at April 3, 2007 9:32 PM


    Since you feel that Iran wishes to embarrass Blair and Bush, why is the Iran story not "political" in nature?

    Posted by: Cecelia at April 3, 2007 9:35 PM
    ???

    "Thats hard news"

    How can a fat ass be hard?

    Well, for one thing, I heard he's put himself on a strict diet after calling himself a "fat ass".

    Posted by: Mike at April 3, 2007 10:08 PM

    That's hard news so you couldn't have heard it on Countdown.


    Posted by: Cecelia at April 3, 2007 10:11 PM
    Divert card played by imbOcile.

    give mike a chance, he's posing as 2 people right now.

    Posted by: royalking at April 3, 2007 10:11 PM

    I suppose his identity depends on whether he is being pressured to defend Keith or denounce him.

    "give mike a chance, he's posing as two people right now"

    No, that couldn't be. According to you, that other guy's a coward for being an anon, but I'm real brave for using my name!

    >I feel like Harry Higgins rejoicing," My God, she's got it".

    That is the point I raised, you should know. How do you expect others to distinguish between your clucking and crapping and any chicken clucking and crapping.

    Grammie
    Posted by: Janet Hawkins at April 3, 2007 9:57 PM

    Nice try Grammie, now let's deal with reality.

    Here's your post in response to mine:

    >Just a friendly little warning. You are skating very close to the edge of complete banality with the use of 'you people' and 'stupid, and 'parrot' all in one short post.

    So, let's see Sherlock. You attribute three words to me and even saying they are contained within 'one short post.'

    Two of the words are correct. One is not. You mean you want everyone here to think that you throwing in a phrase from another anonymous poster from earlier in the day and attributing it to me also saying it was in 'one short post' was an honest mistake?

    Then you have the nerve to say what I do is "Clucking and Crapping.'

    I think you've spent too much time on the farm...

    I'm real brave for using my name!

    Posted by: Mike at April 3, 2007 10:16 PM


    Which name?

    I think Mike has decided to sit in his corner and play with dust motes and little globs of paint on the molding rather then answer.

    I am disappointed in you.

    Grammie

    lmao!

    "Divert card played by ImbOcile"

    WHOOP....WHOOP.....WHOOP!...DIVERT - DIVERT - DIVERT! Incoming MOAB's! DIVE....DIVE....DIVE!

    "Which name?"

    Why Woogy, who else?

    No, that couldn't be. According to you, that other guy's a coward for being an anon, but I'm real brave for using my name!

    Posted by: Mike at April 3, 2007 10:16 the latter is a real stretch

    attributing it to me also saying it was in 'one short post' was an honest mistake?

    Posted by: at April 3, 2007 10:17 PM


    Is there such a thing as a dishonest mistake?

    "Is there such a thing as a dishonest mistake"

    Yea, you Olbermann haters make them all the time!

    "Which name?"

    Why Woogy, who else?

    Posted by: Mike at April 3, 2007 10:21 PM


    Thanks for answer a question, Mike.

    Apologize to Woogy, Royal, it's "Mike" who's the coward.

    Since you feel that Iran wishes to embarrass Blair and Bush, why is the Iran story not "political" in nature?

    Posted by: Cecelia at April 3, 2007 9:35 PM
    ???

    Posted by: royalking at April 3, 2007 10:13 PM

    "Is there such a thing as a dishonest mistake"

    Yea, you Olbermann haters make them all the time!

    Posted by: Mike at April 3, 2007 10:26 PM


    Finally a question you can answer..eh...Mike...

    Apologize to Woogy"

    That's right...you don't want to upset a Woogy!

    "Finally a question you can answer..eh...Mike..."

    'can' and 'will' are two different things.

    ???

    Posted by: royalking at April 3, 2007 10:13 PM


    Posted by: royalking at April 3, 2007 10:26 PM


    What's your question?

    That's right...you don't want to upset a Woogy!

    Posted by: Mike at April 3, 2007 10:28 PM


    We have Mike's whines as an example.

    ""Hey Grammie- Can you show me where I said 'You people' in my one short post?"

    You are absolutely correct. You ONLY used 'stupid' and 'parrot' in that one short post.

    What better illustration of the dangers of being a Chicken Blogger, not only for you but also your readers.

    If you have ever been in a chicken yard you might understand this better. They are all in a frenzy, running around clucking, pecking and crapping. It is a good analogy to the aspect of individuals trying to distinguish which chicken clucked and crapped as opposed to any other chicken.

    I have to change my asessment. You are only perilously close to total banality. If, that is, you are a different chicken from the chicken who has been clucking 'you people' over and over for months and months.

    Grammie
    Posted by: Janet Hawkins at April 3, 2007 9:45 PM "

    What is your problem? I acknowledged that I possibly had confused one chicken's crap with another chicken's crap.

    That is the peril of being a chicken among many chickens that you have chosen for yourself.

    Just a little advice. If you don't like being confused with all the other (assuming that that is the case) chickens and their crap, distinguish yourself in some way.

    As you have told us time and time and time and time again, you are a very bright chicken. Prove it.

    Grammie

    'can' and 'will' are two different things.

    Posted by: Mike at April 3, 2007 10:29 PM


    And you can't so you won't try.

    I told you, he had no answer 3 days ago, he still can't cook anything up, slobber faced mathews won't talk about it, ulbermahn dam sure won't bring it up. He obviously can't think for himself. Maybe the puffington post has an answer for him, olbypologist. Oh, that's right, he doesn't defend ulbermahn.

    Is there such a thing as a dishonest mistake?
    Posted by: Cecelia at April 3, 2007 10:24 PM

    No, there are honest mistakes (mistakes made when the person was doing the best they could with all available information under the circumstances)...

    And then there are instances like Grammies-

    When someone lies (says I said something in one short post which I did not) to further their agenda (that anyone who posts anonymously is a chicken and is full of crap) and then repeatedly lies about it, then when faced with definitive proof that they are lying, claims to have been 'confused' and then continues to say I am chicken and full of crap.

    That is decidedly NOT an honest mistake...

    Cecelia, I was reposting your question to lil mikey. The one he is avoiding like the plague. the "non political" one.

    As you have told us time and time and time and time again, you are a very bright chicken. Prove it.

    Grammie

    Posted by: Janet Hawkins at April 3, 2007 10:34 PM


    Are you crying fowl, Grammie?

    Enough with the 'Help' Grammie...

    "Just a friendly warning..."

    "Just a little advice...."

    How about STOP LYING?

    How's that for some advice.....

    "When someone lies (says I said something in one short post which I did not) to further their agenda (that anyone who posts anonymously is a chicken and is full of crap)"


    How could you, Grammie...

    "As you have told us time and time and time and time again, you are a very bright chicken..."

    No, she's not crying fowl, she's lying again.

    Where did I say time and time again that I am a very bright chicken?

    How can you tell Grammie is lying?

    Her Keyboard is Clucking....

    "are you crying fowl Grammie?"

    No, Grammie cries "swoooonn"!

    Grammie, you're lying. Admit it! You were right! You really didn't make a mistake!

    '
    How could you, Grammie...
    Posted by: Cecelia at April 3, 2007 10:41 PM

    Learned it from the best, no doubt...

    No, Grammie cries "swoooonn"!

    Posted by: Mike at April 3, 2007 10:46 PM


    You don't like her swooning over Johnny?

    "I was reposting your question to Lil Mikey. The one he is avoiding like the plaque. The "non - political" one".

    Not really, I just prefer straight line racing, like drag racing for example. I hate circle tracks!

    Celcelia likes circle tracks. Different strokes for different folks.

    Grammie, you're lying. Admit it! You were right! You really didn't make a mistake!
    Posted by: Cecelia at April 3, 2007 10:48 PM

    Is an intentional mistake still a mistake?

    Not if it's on purpose...

    C'mon Cecelia, I thought you had a firmer grasp on reality than that...

    "you don't like her swooning over Johnny"

    I can't really judge. Is Johnny that good looking?

    Learned it from the best, no doubt...

    Posted by: at April 3, 2007 10:49 PM

    It's a world-wide plot against chicken bloggers.

    The vast chickenwing conspiracy.

    I can't really judge. Is Johnny that good looking?

    Posted by: Mike at April 3, 2007 10:53 PM


    He's swoon-worthy to the max.

    "He's swoon-worthy to the max."

    Well, I'll take your word for it, as long as you don't say the same thing about Bob. I've SEEN him!

    Grammie,

    I"m going to leave you to honest Chickenblogger.... you are the same chickenblogger?... and honest Mike.

    Nite!

    Oh, my dear Chicken, you have it all wrong. Of course, chickens are not very high up on the intelligence scale, so it is not surprising.

    I did admit that I erred in the 3 in 1 statement I made. It was only 2 in 1 for that particular post.

    I then went on to gently explain in very simple terms that your insistence on being a chicken in a frenzied clucking, pecking and crapping barnyard of chickens very easily leads to those types of mistakes.

    I then suggested that you might want to come out of the warm and comforting cover of so many chickens and so much chicken crap and dazzle us with your brillance.

    Your decision, my dear. But, please, don't try to blame the inevitable confusion on others. If one chooses to use the chickens as camouflauge, one should not complain about any consequences.

    In other words, don't be a cowering CHICKEN when confronted with the consequences of your own choices.

    Grammie

    Grammie: That sounds like a lot of chickensh-t to me!

    >Just a friendly little warning. You are skating very close to the edge of complete banality with the use of 'you people' and 'stupid, and 'parrot' all in one short post.

    It wasn't that you just got 'confused' while mistaking me for other anon posters. In fact, I was and had been the only anonymous poster for quite some time.

    That MIGHT be able to get some of your grandkids to believe your lies, but you're missing one important point to you claiming 'confusion'

    Me using 'Parrot' and 'Stupid' and 'You People' was the whole crux of your argument. THAT's what you were calling me out for. THAT's why you were posting. To give me a friendly warning about doing such a thing.

    Now you make it sound like that extra phrase just slipped in because you got anonymous posters confused?

    Give a break.

    So, you tell me exactly when the last time the anonymous poster that you were confusing me with posted, and explain how he was able to slip his words into my post and then magically make them disappear when you weren't looking.

    Talk about a load of Chicken sh-t!

    Aw Mike, you are just jealous that no one has ever swooned over you.

    How are the dust mores and paint globs coming?

    Still waiting. If you can't or won't answer for yourself, what do you leave us with other than to ascribe our own answers to you.

    Grammie

    PS On second thought, I think that the only HONEST answer we could ever get re KO's agenda would not come from you.

    Still waiting. If you can't or won't answer for yourself, what do you leave us with other than to ascribe our own answers to you.

    Grammie

    ...Or just take them from a different post...

    Grammie-

    I remember not all that long ago when you were getting your ass handed to you in a debate, you finally admitted your defeat and said the argument just got too 'surreal' for you.

    Now, you claim you are just 'confused.'

    I had heard you like to play the victim card when you lose a debate.

    Now I have proof, and so does everyone else.

    Grammie: In other words, don't be a cowering CHICKEN when confronted with the consequences of your own LIES.

    Grammie: "How are the dust mores and paint globs coming?' "Still waiting".

    I'm sorry, I didn't know you were that inerested in the "dust mores" and the "paint globs". You must REALLY be bored!

    My 8 lb. Oreck XL took care of them just fine, thank you. I would recoomend it to anyone.

    "So, you tell me exactly when the last time the anonymous poster that you were confusing me with posted, and explain how he was able to slip his words into my post and then magically make them disappear when you weren't looking.

    Talk about a load of Chicken sh-t!
    Posted by: at April 3, 2007 11:10 PM"

    My dear, that is the crux of the matter. Not even the chickens, much less others, can distinguish their chicken crap from another chickens crap.

    As I posted earlier and copied and pasted again, I thought another chicken's crap was mixed in with yours.

    You go on to say:

    "So, you tell me exactly when the last time the anonymous poster that you were confusing me with posted, and explain how he was able to slip his words into my post and then magically make them disappear when you weren't looking"

    Sir, you have the advantage. You are the only one to have the unique knowledge that could, hopefully, distinguish your chicken crap from any other chicken's crap. Some might say that crap is crap, but I still hold out hope that some chickens might come forward and claim their crap as their own

    Red Wolf gave us a nomen clature that works on so many levels. For that contribution alone he should be revered and respected

    Grammie

    "Red Wolf gave us a nomen clature that works on so many levels."

    Yes, Red Wolf left us with so many precious gifts....God rest his soul!

    ""Red Wolf gave us a nomen clature that works on so many levels."

    Yes, Red Wolf left us with so many precious gifts....God rest his soul!
    Posted by: Mike at April 3, 2007 11:45 PM

    Mike, If you say so. I certainly would have never claimed such a thing.

    I could be wrong but I thought that Red Wolf was the one to first use Chicken Blogger. No matter what else he said he did add this to our lexicon.

    Or perhaps you think the appelation is wrong. Is that just you, or does it include your other numerous incarnations.

    Grammie

    "is that you"

    Heavens no, Grammie. I cannot claim to be the famous Red Wolf.

    "I could be wrong"

    Oh heavens no again...even when you claim I say something I didn't, and then go and repost proof that I didn't.

    I mean...you know what I MEAN'T, and thats whats important!

    Grammie-

    I remember not all that long ago when you were getting your ass handed to you in a debate, you finally admitted your defeat and said the argument just got too 'surreal' for you.

    Now, you claim you are just 'confused.'

    I had heard you like to play the victim card when you lose a debate.

    Now I have proof, and so does everyone else.

    Posted by: at April 3, 2007 11:18 PM
    This is, without a doubt, coward ass lil mikey.

    "I was reposting your question to Lil Mikey. The one he is avoiding like the plaque. The "non - political" one".

    Not really, I just prefer straight line racing, like drag racing for example. I hate circle tracks!

    Celcelia likes circle tracks. Different strokes for different folks.

    Posted by: Mike at April 3, 2007 10:51 PM
    crying in the corner, again....can't back his own rhetoric.

    Grammie, as you can see, you really should employ Jeff's fantastic powers of clarvoyance in your effort to sort out the chicken bloggers.

    I mean he knows "This is, without a doubt, coward ass lil mikey".

    I have SUCH a hard time keeping up with what my other personalities are doing, but Jeff's got it all figured out.

    Jeff the village idiot again: "crying in the corner again...can't back his own rhetoric."

    Wassamatta Jeff, can't even come up with your own 'questions', so you gonna go and taunt me with Mother Cecelia's instead?

    You're so brave, it just scares the living hell out of me!

    This is, without a doubt, coward ass lil mikey.
    Posted by: royalking at April 4, 2007 12:03 AM

    Wassamatta Jeff, can't even come up with your own 'questions', so you gonna go and taunt me with Mother Cecelia's instead?

    You're so brave, it just scares the living hell out of me!

    Posted by: Mike at April 4, 2007 12:13 AM
    Go back and look at fridays olbermann lie fest, I asked the exact same question, so did cecilia, sharon did too. You are too stupid to back your own fat ass mouth, like you fat ass hero, the enemy defender.

    Mike, if you are going to quote me please don't omit a word in the middle of the quote.

    Per your so called quote:

    ""is that you"

    The complete text:

    "Or perhaps you think the appelation is wrong. Is that just you, or does it include your other numerous incarnations."

    Mike, Woogy, Woozy, Mutt or any other chicken clucking and crapping identity that you use you are slipping further and further in my estimation.

    Grammie

    PS What is KO's agenda?

    Well Grammie since you are either not listening, or you are calling me a liar...lets review:

    1) - I was Woogy, which I readily admitted.
    2) - I was Mutt, but only for a short time to hassle Jeff, as I readily admitted.
    3) - I think I used Woogy one time shortly after this blog thing reopened, but only because Jeff asked "where was Woogy". I then came clean of my own violition, Jeff did not 'expose' me. He's too dumb to 'expose' anybody.
    4) - There never was any 'Woozy', just like there is no 'mikey'. That was just Jeff's name mangling again.
    5) - Presently I am not using any identity other than 'Mike', as I stated I would not do several weeks ago. I am not posting as an anon either.
    6) - SO if an 'anon' or "chicken blogger" addresses you, it won't be me.
    7) - Jeff has lied about me being other posters many, many times....sometimes it's funny...sometimes it's just plain annoying....but trying to annoy me seems to be this idiot's main purpose in life.

    Now Janet or Grammie, you just asked me a question. IF you want me to play straight with you, answer your questions, or take anything you do or say seriously, you will stop playing along with the site idiot....and forget about Woogy and Mutt. I have no apology or shame for having posted with those names, nor should I have either.

    Also, you might try seriously addressing how "Trying to back me into a corner" magically became "I claimed you backed me into a corner" in your mind?

    THEN and only THEN can we get back to any serious discussions....and meanwhile I don't give a damn whether I am "slipping further and further" in your estimation or not.

    Got it......Grammie?

    "Mike, if you are going to quote me please don't omit a word in the middle of the quote."

    Yeah, Mike...how dare you omit a word from a quote from a chicken sh-t-raker who decides to fabricate phrases and then insert them into quotes from people and then lie about it.

    You should be ashamed of yourself!

    Mike, if you are going to quote me please don't omit a word in the middle of the quote."

    Yeah, Mike...how dare you omit a word from a quote from a chicken sh-t-raker who decides to fabricate phrases and then insert them into quotes from people and then lie about it.

    You should be ashamed of yourself!

    This would be lil mikeys alter ego.

    THEN and only THEN can we get back to any serious discussions....and meanwhile I don't give a damn whether I am "slipping further and further" in your estimation or not.

    Got it......Grammie?

    Posted by: Mike at April 4, 2007 12:47 AM
    In other words, he's never going to answer your questions or explain his rhetoric.

    Jeff.....remember your LATEST lie....that you are going to start ignoring me? Not only are you not ignoring me, you are butting into other conversations....again.

    Jeff, continuing to prove he's the village...er, site idiot!

    Jeff.....remember your LATEST lie....that you are going to start ignoring me? Not only are you not ignoring me, you are butting into other conversations....again.

    Jeff, continuing to prove he's the village...er, site idiot!

    Posted by: Mike at April 4, 2007 1:13 AM
    Proving a point and lying are different, lil mikey, you should know that, then again you're an olbyloon.

    "Proving a point and lying are different, lil mikey, you should know that, then again you're an olbyloon."

    Now if only you could prove a point.

    Mike, are you quite sure that you want to toss around the word liar when we all saw your anti McArthur speech that "I shall NOT return".

    And yet, here you still are.

    Irregardless of any other opinions of you, I have formed and adapted my opinion of you as time and exposure goes by. And that is based on what YOU have done, not the opinions of others. If you believe that I depend on others to shape my ideas and opinions about you, you are sorely mistaken.

    I realize that this is a new world, and that world offers a great deal of anonmynity.

    That anomymity does not absolve us as individuals of our obligation to be honest and forthright. It does, however, afford us an opportunity to be as nasty and lying as the lowest of the low or anywhere in between the lowest and the highest with impunity.

    Witness the Chicken Bloggers and their name hijacking ilk. Although we are all anonymous to a degree (my real name is out there, what is yours), these low lives milk the system to the max.

    My personal opinion is that Red Wolf coined the term Chicken Blogger as the counterpoint to Chicken Hawk. I, though, embraced the term because it is so apropos to the true nature of any chicken in any chicken yard and the true nature of our Chicken Bloggers.

    Grammie

    PS What is KO's agenda?

    Janet, I have never called YOU a liar, but I THINK you just called me one. Tell me you really didn't do that?

    And by the way, my 'real' name is very much MIke.

    You can insinuate I'm a liar for changing my mind after stating I was going to either do or not do something, but you and I know that is NOT the definition of a lie. A lie is telling an intentional untruth. If you believe I 'lied', then you have to also believed this entire site, or Mr. Cox 'lied' as well, when it said it was closing. I'm personally giving it the benefit of the doubt that Bob meant it when he said it...how about you? If Bob meant it when he said it, then he DIDN'T lie, did he?

    By your shallow definition of a 'lie', I could easily accuse YOU of lying when you reposted an untruth about something you said I said, but didn't say.even though you have YET to adequately justify why you did that!!!

    As for the word 'liar'.....your going to continue to see me use that word when it is justified. You see Jeff IS a liar, and he is the only one I am calling that on this board, in case you haven't noticed.

    When people like you quit defending others on this board simply because they are "on your team", this will become an honest discussion board. Until then....not a chance.

    When I, along with others on this board have chastized you for being too sensitive, we did it because it was true. If you have some honest criticizm of me, I'm willing to take it to heart...I'm not perfect....but being a liar is not one of my faults!

    As for KO's agenda? How the hell should I know, or are you accusing me of being KO too?

    And finally Janet...WHAT exactly is your problem with not continually dredging up the past, and moving forward with honest discussions about KO and policy? After all, THAT is what this board is supposed to be about...NOT us.

    As for KO's agenda? How the hell should I know, or are you accusing me of being KO too?

    And finally Janet...WHAT exactly is your problem with not continually dredging up the past, and moving forward with honest discussions about KO and policy? After all, THAT is what this board is supposed to be about...NOT us.

    Posted by: Mike at April 4, 2007 2:57 AM


    Doesn't asking you to flesh-out your own assertion that Keith Olbermann has an agenda qualify as "discusions about KO and policy"?

    The only thing THAT subject would have to do with you or Grammie personally, is that you made the assertion that Olbermann had one, and she (and several others)asked you articulate your thoughts on that agenda.

    So we've established that this a subject suitable for this board and it is a line of discussion that YOU opened.

    I admit I was at first taken back by your indignation when you are questioned and asked to explain or flesh-out the assertions YOU put forth in response to other's remarks about K.O.

    I was particularly taken back by your counter charge (here represented by your most current rephrasing "As for KO's agenda? How the hell should I know, or are you accusing me of being KO too?")
    that it is innately UNREASONABLE to ask you to explain your own statements. That doing so puts you under unreasonable duress....perhaps you are being "accused of being K.O."..... that you are being pressured to defend K.O.......that you are being pressure to denounce K.O.....

    Now I see that it really does make perfect sense in your mind that you should be able to make any statement you wish about K.O. and yet simultaneously assert that any expectation of your explaining those statments is the unreasonable expectation that you somehow crawl into Olbermann's mind.

    As I have said I've never bothered to read most of your posst. I'd get to the place where you invariably invoked Fox News and snore off. Even still, I was under a false perception of your intelligence.

    That said, I know that you do have a rudimentary intelligence that makes it clear to you that your tact is essentially dishonest. You KNOW better. Therefore the fact that you aren't too bright does nothing to excuse the fact that you are also a liar.

    I'm going to be here to point that out assidiuously.

    Mike, I just read your last post and Cecelia,s last post to you.

    First, I concur with what Cecelia said.

    Second, I will respond point by point to your last post, but this afternoon. Right now I have to get dressed and go to Physical Therapy.

    Grammie

    And finally Janet...WHAT exactly is your problem with not continually dredging up the past, and moving forward with honest discussions about KO and policy? After all, THAT is what this board is supposed to be about...NOT us.

    Posted by: Mike at April 4, 2007 2:57 AM
    In other words, "I'm full of sh-t and can't back by big mouth."

    Cecelia: Why don't I want to "flesh out" my conclusions with you?

    Because, Cecelia, as I pointed out the other night before AND after you got mad and LIED when you called me a 'liar'...you exposed yourself as nothing but a sanctimoneous bitch, something I had not fully grasped until then, although it should not have surprised me the way it did....I admit that had actually thought you were better than that.....my bad!

    Also 'Cecelia', it is NOT your option to pick and choose the answers you will and will not accept from me, OR anyone else on this board. Engaging in "Debate" does not give you the right to continually pick apart and misrepresent someone else's words to your choosing. I gave you answers....but they just weren't good enough for you. Why? Because you just KNOW you're right, and therefore any 'honest' conclusion could ONLY lead to the same conclusion YOU came to!

    Bottom line: Don't like my answers? Thats YOUR problem....bitch!

    As for your really silly 'threat' to hassle me....I can hassle with the best of them, so remember that, little Miss. sanctimoneous. More likely, I will eventually get tired of this nonsense because I've finally realized that there is not a single Olbermann hater on this site worthy of my time, effort, or respect, as my very sweet wife has been trying to tell me for months. It's also clear that obsessing about a guy on TV pretty much IS your lives. You apparently have none other than to obsess about a pundit who dares displease you by not doing things the way you think he should....and that doesn't make YOU very bright either....this is despite your affinity for throwing out obscure words that no one actually uses in real life in an obvious and vain attempt to make yourslf appear more intelligent and sophisticated than you actually are.


    It's also clear that this board is simply about team sports with you people. If someone on MY side says or does something you consider wrong or reprehensible, you're right on them like fies on a corpse. However if someone on YOUR side does something even more reprehensible, it's perfectly excusable.... because after all, at least they're not an 'Olbyloon'. This truth has little or nothing to do with right/wrong, good/bad, journalism/punditry, Fox/MSNBC. It has also become very clear that there is only a very insignificant handfull of people like you constantly obsessing this kind of hate on this board the way you do.

    As for your really silly 'threat' to hassle me....I can hassle with the best of them, so remember that, little Miss. sanctimoneous. More likely, I will eventually get tired of this nonsense because I've finally realized that there is not a single Olbermann hater on this site worthy of my time, effort, or respect, as my very sweet wife has been trying to tell me for months. It's also clear that obsessing about a guy on TV pretty much IS your lives. You apparently have none other than to obsess about a pundit who dares displease you by not doing things the way you think he should....and that doesn't make YOU very bright either....this is despite your affinity for throwing out obscure words that no one actually uses in real life in an obvious and vain attempt to make yourslf appear more intelligent and sophisticated than you actually are.


    It's also clear that this board is simply about team sports with you people. If someone on MY side says or does something you consider wrong or reprehensible, you're right on them like fies on a corpse. However if someone on YOUR side does something even more reprehensible, it's perfectly excusable.... because after all, at least they're not an 'Olbyloon'. This truth has little or nothing to do with right/wrong, good/bad, journalism/punditry, Fox/MSNBC. It has also become very clear that there is only a very insignificant handfull of people like you constantly obsessing this kind of hate on this board the way you do.


    Posted by: Mike at April 4, 2007 1:25 PM
    Do you ever think before you spew? Could you shove your foot any farther down your throat? Could you be any more of a hypocrite? Who's "obsessing?" Who lurks here 24/7?

    "Do you ever think before you spew? Could you shove your foot any farther down your throat? Could you be any more of a hypocrite? Who's "obsessing?" Who lurks here 24/7?"


    Uh, that would be you.

    craigs, a typical scapegoat response, none at all, brainless. Defending THE biggest hypocrite anywhere, not so intelligent, not so surprised, either.

    "Defending THE biggest hypocrite anywhere, not so intelligent, not so surprised, either."

    I wasn't defending you. Although I think you self-assessment was the most accurate you've ever been.

    "who lurks here 24/7"

    YOU do. Don't forget moron, that many times you were accusing other posters of being me when I wasn't even in town, so, it's not surprising that YOU would think I lurk here 24/7.

    YOU actually DO lurk here 24/7.

    lil mikey, do you hear what you are saying, at all? lmao, again.

    "lil mikey, do you hear what you are saying, at all? Imao, again"

    Uh...no...moron, because I'm typing on a keyboard and all I hear are clicks.

    Mike, here is the reply I promised.

    Janet, I have never called YOU a liar, but I THINK you just called me one. Tell me you really didn't do that?

    And neither did I call you a liar now or on several other ocassions when you've brought this up. My question was do you really want to toss the word liar around and I referenced your avowal to never come here again.

    It is a legitimate question in the context of you @ 1:13 AM accusing RoyalKing of lying @ 7:41 when he stated that he would ignore you in future.

    I didn't and don't think you lied when you made your farewell speech and swore you would never be back. At the time I believed you meant it very seriously but that you would come back, just as you did. I also didn't and still don't think RoyalKing was lying when he said he would ignore you in future. I took that post to be RK yanking your chain, again.


    And by the way, my 'real' name is very much MIke.

    Mike, seriously, I didn't know that you are so famous that people know you far and wide just as they know Madonna, Elvis, J LO (?). You have made several remarks recently because I dropped my legal name and just used my family and freind's name for me. With your admitted history of using multiple names I thought that was over the top.

    On this site virtually everyone knows Janet HAWKINS and Grammie are the same person. And yet you called me to task when I dropped the Janet Hawkins after R Cox started his update of the site.

    As I said several times, what is your legal name? As a man with many names here you take the prize for chutspah with those remarks.

    You can insinuate I'm a liar for changing my mind after stating I was going to either do or not do something, but you and I know that is NOT the definition of a lie. A lie is telling an intentional untruth. If you believe I 'lied', then you have to also believed this entire site, or Mr. Cox 'lied' as well, when it said it was closing. I'm personally giving it the benefit of the doubt that Bob meant it when he said it...how about you? If Bob meant it when he said it, then he DIDN'T lie, did he?

    As I said earlier in this post, I didn't and don't think you lied in your grand finale speech. I am starting to think that you are so sensitive that you think anything less than total agreement with you means the big old meanies are calling you a liar.

    By your shallow definition of a 'lie', I could easily accuse YOU of lying when you reposted an untruth about something you said I said, but didn't say.even though you have YET to adequately justify why you did that!!!

    I did not repost an untruth. I copied and pasted your comment completely, in fact it was a paragraph. I did err when I left the 'trying' out of the original paraphrase of your statement because that was how I remembered it. I took your response that you never said any such thing to mean that you were denying ever having made any allusion at all.

    I went back and found the original and reposted it in its entirety, including the word 'trying'. I responed several times pointing out that however you characterized it, the sense of your statement was that I backed you into a corner so you had no choice but to say what you did.

    As for the word 'liar'.....your going to continue to see me use that word when it is justified. You see Jeff IS a liar, and he is the only one I am calling that on this board, in case you haven't noticed.

    When people like you quit defending others on this board simply because they are "on your team", this will become an honest discussion board. Until then....not a chance.

    When I, along with others on this board have chastized you for being too sensitive, we did it because it was true. If you have some honest criticizm of me, I'm willing to take it to heart...I'm not perfect....but being a liar is not one of my faults!

    As for KO's agenda? How the hell should I know, or are you accusing me of being KO too?

    And finally Janet...WHAT exactly is your problem with not continually dredging up the past, and moving forward with honest discussions about KO and policy? After all, THAT is what this board is supposed to be about...NOT us.
    Posted by: Mike at April 4, 2007 2:57 AM

    You know, I lied. I'm not going to waste my time going point by point with you here. You are starting to sound more and more like a bitter spinster aunt.

    You know, I lied. I'm not going to waste my time going point by point with you here. You are starting to sound more and more like a bitter spinster aunt.

    Posted by: Janet Hawkins at April 4, 2007 4:09 PM


    How dare you attempt to pick and choose the answers you will accept from Mike by rebutting them or asking him to debate them on.....this....well....debate blog board...


    How dare you, Janet...expect any sort of consistency or honesty from Mike...or to expect him to consider the logical conclusions to any arguments, assertions...or implications that he makes.

    How dare you challenge Mike in any way.....his sweet wife doesnt' understand why he puts up with it by spending hours here with you blogboard obsessed-- no life people....how could you force him to defend...to denounce....to crawl in the head of someone with whom he is defending and ascribing motivations!

    In conclusion, Grammie....how dare you...how dare you....how dare you!!!

    Don't you know this is my turf now....

    Janet, I really intended to just ignore lil mikey, but, like I said yesterday, It's kinda like when you step in dog sh-t, it's kind a hard to just ignore, especially when he ever so often hoists himself up on his lil soap box with his lil superiourity complex. Fortunately, myself, as well as several other posters have no problem smacking him right down from his lil soap box. Every body's a liar and every body's a Fox News nut (#1, I might add) and he doesn't defend Ulbermahn, after 1000 times, we get it.

    Don't you know this is my turf now....

    Posted by: Cecelia at April 4, 2007 4:40 PM
    LOL! Funny stuff, Cecelia.

    Jeff AKA moron again: "everybody's a liar"

    NO Jeff, not everybody, YOU'RE a liar. A repetitve liar!

    Jef again: ""every body's a Fox News nut"

    NO Jeff, not everybody, YOU'RE a Fox 'News' nut.

    See the difference between 'eveybody' and YOU?

    Cecelia, all I can say is , yes mam. :)

    And, RK, have you been a big bad bully to Mikey again? :)

    Just between us, he seems to be very sensitive and takes things so personally. And then his feelings get all hurt and we all force him to climb up a ladder to get on his high horse and tell us all off. What choice do we leave the poor boy.

    Grammie

    From this link:

    http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/04/04/edwards-returns-to-iowa/

    April 4th,
    2007
    10:53 am DBroome, please give us all a break! We know why the south was once solidly Democratic–because they were furious at Republican Lincoln for ending slavery. We also know why it is no longer Democratic–because they were furious at Democratic LBJ for the Civil Rights Act, the Voting Rights Act and Affirmative Action.

    Historically, the south lines up with whatever party is more anti-black. Currently, the Republicans hold distinction hands down, despite the Michael Steeles, Condi Rices and Colin Powells.

    During the last election, they interviewed a young man on the local news (NC) about why–even though he was struggling and his job was being outsourced–he was a Republican. His answer? “There are too many blacks and Mexicans in the Democrat party.”

    I don’t for a minute believe that every Republican is a KKK member but I do believe that every KKK member is a Republican.

    I’m a born and raised southerner and still live in NC so I’m not just guessing. I live this every day.

    — Posted by Yvonne

    Jeff AKA moron again: "everybody's a liar"

    NO Jeff, not everybody, YOU'RE a liar. A repetitve liar!

    Jef again: ""every body's a Fox News nut"

    NO Jeff, not everybody, YOU'RE a Fox 'News' nut.

    See the difference between 'eveybody' and YOU?

    Posted by: Mike at April 4, 2007 6:37 PM
    Noper, coold ya'll pleeze splain? i liyd heer on theeze internets 105 timz olreddy....leest that what liyer mikey sez, heez the smrtest feller in the hole internets, he can talk fer them ther dumbocrats and he can talk fer republikans too, leest thats what i herd no wayz..

    "I’m a born and raised southerner and still live in NC so I’m not just guessing. I live this every day. "

    Hmmm, seems to me this person has a very simple to understand picture of southern mentality as far as poor and middle class racist white people.

    All the double talk and all the spin can't color this picture any other way except for the what it is.

    Reality bites, and so does blind ignorance.

    Now rather than acknowledging the huge mistake it has been to vote any party affiliation that is seemingly the most white, what do stupid racist low life hicks do? They dig in and defend the stupidity of their political practices.

    How to check this theory? Just observe the daily ritualistic gate keepers of this page talking in circles how all the failures of Bush-Cheney and the late Republican congress is everyone and any one's fault but those who elected them in the first place. (I guess this is what they mean by the party of personal responsibility)

    After all, our politicians are only what we allow them to be. They go too far and we vote them out.

    Well most of us do that any way. You can observe here the tiny fraction of morons who do not. They are here on this page playing a game of pretend with the "I got you back" support for each other. They do this in a futile attempt to hold up their veil of delusions that covers for their reality.

    Reality check: Bush is a bumbling idiot who can't speak the English language and has zero respect for the letter of the law - The Constitution. He has turned the world against us post 911 sympathy and he is disliked by more than 70% of Americans.

    Who are the remaining at best 30%? What is there mentality? I think that is a no brainer. Literally!

    Noper, coold ya'll pleeze splain? i liyd heer on theeze internets 105 timz olreddy....leest that what liyer mikey sez, heez the smrtest feller in the hole internets, he can talk fer them ther dumbocrats and he can talk fer republikans too, leest thats what i herd no wayz..

    Posted by: royalking at April 4, 2007 7:43 PM

    That's it? That's all you got? Do you ever wonder who does a better job of making you look like the dumb a--hole you are - Mike, myself, or you?

    Jethro himself looks like a genius compared to you and your sophomoric comments Jeff... er ahh... I mean Royalhick

    Cecelia, all I can say is , yes mam. :)


    Posted by: Janet Hawkins at April 4, 2007 7:06 PM


    On second thought, Grammie, clean up his b.s. all you want.

    He'll make more.

    Grammie on 'mikey: "he's seems to be very sensitive".

    Pot meet kettle...kettle meet Janet.

    Contratulations Janet!....that was a classic "I know you are but what am I" comeback.

    Contratulations Janet!....that was a classic "I know you are but what am I" comeback.

    Posted by: Mike at April 4, 2007 8:17 PM
    Congratulations, lil mikey, you're still an olbyloon using several names and "anon" to post under. Why? That, I don't know....

    And Jeff, you're still a LIAR!!!

    I haven't used another name in weeks, including 'anon'. Why do you persist with this lie?...even my 'enemies' on your side of the fence know you're lying.....again.

    MORON!

    haven't used another name in weeks, including 'anon'. Why do you persist with this lie?...even my 'enemies' on your side of the fence know you're lying.....again.

    MORON!

    Posted by: Mike at April 4, 2007 9:15 PM
    really? hold on... That said, I know that you do have a rudimentary intelligence that makes it clear to you that your tact is essentially dishonest. You KNOW better. Therefore the fact that you aren't too bright does nothing to excuse the fact that you are also a liar.

    Who said that? I think Mike has decided to sit in his corner and play with dust motes and little globs of paint on the molding rather then answer.
    Who said that? How do you spell hypocrite Jeff?

    Er, I mean imbecile?

    Posted by: at April 3, 2007 6:04 PM

    Haven't posted "anon" in weeks? Another bare faced lie. Should I find more posts ridiculing you? From different people, that is? I know there are many more in recent days and minutes for that matter.

    "should I find more posts riiculing you?"

    I don'r give a damn what you find...your making a total ass out of yourself.

    "Haven't posted "anon' in weeks? Another bare faced lie."

    I made a point earlier that went right over your head....so I will repeat it: Just because YOU are a serial pathological liar, it doesn't mean other folks share your bottom rung ethical standard.

    Prove it....MORON!

    Go to Mrrichardcranium.com for the no spin and whatever other cliche saying I can think of for you to go there~!