Prediction: Story will run from the angle that Nancy Pelosi, by TALKING to Syria, was able to accomplish, with the help of Syria, the release of the hostages. A perfect opportunity to bash Mr. Bush saying the speaker has to do his job for him because of Mr. Bush's policy or lack thereof. Lame ducks will be out in force plus the usual blah, blah, blah.

How could Tehran Keith not report about the "pardon" of the Iranian president?

He will no doubt bloviate over the powerful power of "diplomacy"

I'm surprised Pelosi did not fly to tehran for the photo opp.

He has to cover this story now...he can not possibly be that obtuse! Although...it is amazing he has completely spiked the story to begin with.

I'll bet it will be one of those "canned/pre-recorded" reports without him needing to comment or have a guest.

Teheran Keith will now mention the story to praise Iran and Bash the US. He will then credit Pelosi with freeing the hostages and sya that Iran and Syria aren't a threat.

DUGUN: I like your angle!

I totally agree with DUGAN. This is PERFECT Olbyspin. And of course the WINNER in all of this has to be Iran. The "rock star" will probably make up some story about the British caving in or that somehow the U.S. (i.e George Bush) caved in.

But I think that Queen Bee Pelosi will be the savior and the one who actually freed the "hostages" (whoops, sorry, shouldn't use that word!).

GREAT THANKS!!

I predict that Johnny $$ will remain in his mom's basement, typing away furiously, because he believes that someone with an I.Q. higher than that of a turnip gives a flying f--- about what he says.

WORSTEST
BLOG
ON
THE
ENTIRE
f---ING
INTERNET!!!!!!

I predict that Johnny $$ will remain in his mom's basement, typing away furiously, because he believes that someone with an I.Q. higher than that of a turnip gives a flying f--- about what he says.

WORSTEST
BLOG
ON
THE
ENTIRE
f---ING
INTERNET!!!!!!

Posted by: captain igor at April 4, 2007 4:59 PM

"DITTOS" This is the same tired old republican crap. "DESTROY THE MESSENGER!"

I preDICK that captain igor will continue to visit Olbermann Watch on a daily basis, from HIS mom's basebment, of course.

I predict that "Johnnynevercamelately" will continue to write this juvenile crap because he needs a job.

"DESTROY THE MESSENGER!"

We're not destroying the messenger... we're ridiculing and laughing at the messenger.

Prediction: Whatever Olby says, his conclusion will be that this is bad for ChimpyMcHaliHitlerBush and the Rethuglicans!

"I predict that "Johnnynevercamelately" will continue to write this juvenile crap because he needs a job."

Good point... lord knows you'd never name call or write juvenile crap.

Hmmm. What will Olby do? I think he will run an NBC package about the crisis (which isn't quite over yet) and then tell his adoring (not) audience about one of his nauseating personal experiences and its direct relationship with how Nancy Pelosi's efforts (spare me) secured the release of the 15 British hostages. I doubt it was Pelosi as much as it was Nimitz, Eisenhower and Stennis.

I predict that Olby's head will get stuck further in his own ass requiring the help from the Olbyloons and those at tvnewser to attack those who point out the obvious, namely that Olby is a complete hack with no actual credibility at all. I predict that Johnny $ will sum up countdown in too many words. You only need to repeat the same summary every night. 1) Olby Lied 2) Olby ignored facts 3) Olby thinks himself funny 4) Olby lied again 5) Olby gives "great thanks" to some absolute douchebag. And........repeat.

If one wants to know what Keith will say go to the sources, liberal blogs. That is what I did and found ideas that will be lifted for the hour of spin. Check out http://www.huffingtonpost.com/taylor-marsh/bush-vacations-while-pelo_b_44989.html

Pelosi's poo will be dangling from Olbermans nose tonight.

Every now and again it is good to repost my playbook.

1. Make things up about the person you are attacking: It’s important to make your lies sound true. Preface your argument with the word “clearly.” “Clearly, The Skipper is a liar, an a--hole and a neo-con to boot.”

2. Be an armchair psychologist: You’re a smart person. You’ve heard of Freud. You took a psychology course in college. Clearly, you’re qualified to psychoanalyze your opponent. “Wardmama, by using the word ‘zucchini’ in her posting, shows she has a bad case of penis envy.”

3. Cross-post your flames everywhere: Every conservative blogger on the net is just waiting for the next literary masterpiece to leave your terminal! From the Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiller Empire to VodkaPundit, they’re all holding their breath until your next flame. Therefore, post everywhere.

4. Conspiracies abound: If everyone’s against you, the reason can’t *possibly* be that you’re a sh-thead. There’s obviously a conspiracy against you, and you will be doing the entire net a favor by exposing it.

5. Lawsuit threats: This is the reverse of Rule #4 (sort of like the Yin & Yang of Flaming). Threatening a lawsuit is always considered to be in good form. “By saying that I’ve posted to the wrong group, Bertha has libeled me, slandered me, and sodomized me. See you in court, Bertha.”

6. Force them to document their claims: Even if George Bush states outright that he likes tomato sauce on his pasta, you should demand documentation. If Newsweek hasn’t written an article on Bush’s pasta preferences, then Bush is obviously lying.

7. Use foreign phrases: French is good, but Latin is the lingua franca of flaming. You should use the words “ad hominem” at least three times per article. Other favorite Latin phrases are “ad nauseum,” “veni, vidi, vici,” and “fettuccini alfredo.”

8. Tell ‘em how smart you are: Why use intelligent arguments to convince them you’re smart when all you have to do is tell them? State that you’re a member of Mensa, or Mega, or Dorks of America. Tell them the scores you received on every exam since high school. “I got an 800 on my SATs, LSATs, GREs, MCATs, and I can also spell the word ‘neanderthal’ .”

9. Accuse your opponent of censorship: It is your right as an American citizen to post whatever the hell you want to the net (as guaranteed by the 37th Amendment, I think). Anyone who tries to limit your cross-posting or move a flame war to email is either a communist, a fascist, or even worse ... a “neo-con”.

10. Doubt their existence: You’ve never actually seen your opponent, have you? And since you’re the center of the universe, you should have seen them by now, shouldn’t you? Therefore, THEY DON’T EXIST! This is the beauty of Liberals’ logic.

11. Don’t hold back: Lie, cheat, steal, leave the toilet seat up. Leave no stone unturned. Hate everything. Attack them all. As a last resort you may even quote heavy metal rock lyrics to justify your argument. Nine Inch Nails is good. Twisted Sister is better.

12. When in doubt, insult: If you forget the other 11 rules, remember this one. At some point during your wonderful career as a Liberal troll you will undoubtedly end up in a flame war with someone who is better than you. This person will expose your lies, tear apart your arguments, make you look generally like a freaking retard. At this point, there’s only one thing to do: INSULT THE DIRTBAG!!! “Oh yeah? Well, your mother does strange things with vegetables.”

"...your mother does strange things with vegetables"

And, sooooo, that would be considered a bad thing?

Since Ahmadinejad comes out looking good in all of this, I'm willing to bet that Keith will cover it. Heck, Keith might even try to say that Nancy Pelosi was responsible for the release of the hostages.

Here's a challenge to KO..name those students who attacked Karl Rove last WPITW..if you have any guts.

What! Olby mentioned Iran! Of course, he had to badmouth our country in the process, but he actually did mention the story.

I think that Olbermoronn will continue to ignore the story. However, if I am wrong, I will make a prediction: If Olbermoronn has an "expert" (i.e., a leftist kook completely void of any expertise, authority or experience to comment on the matter) on his gameshow, then Olbermoronn's first "question" to the "expert" will be: How damaging is this to Bush?

Olby reported that the hostages have been released. They have not been released yet; they are still in Tehran.

The hostages are to be turned over the the British embassy at 4:30 a.m. GMT (in roughly 3 hours).

Its so nice that we're all concerned about the Brits despite their retreatist attitude towards Iraq. Sadly, I think some wish the captured soldiers harm in order to justify military action.

The bad news: despite this site's Pelosi-derangement (what do you have against Grandmothers, anyway?), Bush was the one who capitulated yet again to terrorist "harborers" when it was politically expedient to do so (e.g. Pakistan).

Keith hatred won't change that.

The, you are one sick puppy.

But Loon--you and your fellow Loons use every single one of those plays in reverse. Heal thyself before preaching to others. Oh, I forgot. On Olbyplanet, everything YOU and Olbermann do is perfect and never wrong and anyone who dares disagree with you should remain silent. Sorry, but see, here in the REAL WORLD, things don't quite work the way you want them to.

Damn this pile of sh-t O'Reilly is beyond obsessed with Rosie.. If they were to get together Rosie would be the pitcher and O'Reilly would be ass up... Hey Rosie.. go completely crazy.. hunt O'Reilly down.. take Cheney with you

So much for those alleged liberal beliefs of non-violence, peace and tolerance.

I predict that "Johnnynevercamelately" will continue to write this juvenile crap because he needs a job.

Posted by: at April 4, 2007 5:44 PM
What's funny is Johnny knows exactly who you are!

"The bad news: despite this site's Pelosi-derangement (what do you HAVE AGAINST GRANDMOTERS, anyway?), Bush was the one who capitulated yet again to terrorist "harborers" when it was politically expedient to do so (e.g. Pakistan).

Keith hatred won't change that.
Posted by: The at April 4, 2007 9:34 PM"

My caps.

Gee, what DO Chicken Bloggers have against grandmothers?

Grammie

That 1-12 list is Great. And I've personally witnessed the Olber-Obsessed doing each and every one. Does anyone doubt me? Shall I prove it?

Don't argue with Grammie, When you prove her wrong she'll claim 'confusion' and blame YOU for her mistake.

But Loon--you and your fellow Loons use every single one of those plays in reverse. Heal thyself before preaching to others. Oh, I forgot. On Olbyplanet, everything YOU and Olbermann do is perfect and never wrong and anyone who dares disagree with you should remain silent. Sorry, but see, here in the REAL WORLD, things don't quite work the way you want them to.
Posted by: Brandon at April 4, 2007 9:37 PM

Brandon's so dense he actually thinks the top 12 list is Pro-Liberal.

Read and retain much Brandon?

"Don't argue with Grammie, When you prove her wrong she'll claim 'confusion' and blame YOU for her mistake.
Posted by: at April 4, 2007 10:05 PM "

Oh dear, that is so sophomoric, no, so juvenile.

I understand that at your level of intellectual and emotional development that you truly believe that YOUR clucking, pecking and crapping in the frenzied chicken yard is so brillant that everyone must know your crap from all the other chicken crap.

In your infantile self centered world you are convinced that everyone can distinguish your very own crap from all the other crap.

Doesn't work that way. Additionally, you are so insignificant that it is the height of hubris to even entertain the thought.

Grammie

Grammie

Oh dear, that is so sophomoric, no, so juvenile.

Don't forget so, true!

Grammie

Grammie
Posted by: Janet Hawkins at April 4, 2007 10:19 PM

Grammie-The old bag so nice, they named her twice!

All you can do is insult me and you call me Juvenile?

At least when I fling the insults I drop some knowledge on you.

Yes, Indeed, you were wrong. You looked at a post and 'ASSUMED' I said something I didn't.

Nothing you can say about your Chicken Farm will change that simple fact.

Grammie Grammie you are Wrong! Wrong!

>Doesn't work that way. Additionally, you are so insignificant that it is the height of hubris to even entertain the thought.

Yes, Grammie, Please explain to me 'How it works.' You who doesn't even know what an IP address is.

So insignificant? hubris?

Oh, you wound me.

So insignificant you can't help but to respond to my posts.

I own you Janet ChickenHawkins...

(And did I mention you were wrong?)

I do believe I hit a nerve.

Grammie

Here's an insight into the average Olbermann fan. Either they're unemployed or undermployed. Seriously, from their fan forums I've learned that many are "professional students", i.e., too scared to actually graduate and face the real world; people who work in video stores, fast food establishments, and Kwikie marts. They live in apartments they've likened to looking like Bldg 18 at Walter Reed or yes, still living at home with their parents. They have to take public transportation, or have unreliable vehicles which they bitch about. In their off-line real lives, these people lead lives of quiet desperation. But here online, they have a magical kingdom where "KO", is their imaginary boyfriend whom they must defend at all costs. I imagine their hoard of cats miss them as they while away hours at a time on the internet posting their insults and incoherent ramblings here, but in the end, it's all they have. And as we all know, with Olbermann, they don't have very much now do they?

Hit a Nerve? No you actually just made a fool of yourself. Want Proof?

A Detailing of Grammie's 'Confusion'

My Post:

>Wow, Grammie, not very smart are you. I was naming Cecelia's favorite bird, not yours.
Cecelia's the Parrot. You come up with all the stupid stuff you say yourself.
Except for Chicken Blogger...I think you parroted that one...
Posted by: at April 3, 2007 9:01 PM

Grammie's Response:

>Just a friendly little warning. You are skating very close to the edge of complete banality with the use of 'you people' and 'stupid, and 'parrot' all in one short post.
Posted by: Janet Hawkins at April 3, 2007 9:18 PM

Then she continually argued that I DID in fact say 'you people' even after I informed her I didn't.

"...while my Chicken is blatantly using 'you people'.

Then when proven wrong, she blamed ME for her thinking that I included 'you people' in my 'One Short Post.' So, it went from being 'blatant' to oh, I guess I was confused, but it was your fault!

And here's her buddy Cecelia even telling her to give it a rest:

>Grammie,
at says she ain't the same "at" that we saw earlier and that you should know that she ain't the same "at". Can you do your mea culpa for "at".
Posted by: Cecelia at April 3, 2007 9:43 PM

And the interesting thing is, I never said they should be able to tell my posts from any other, I went to great lengths to EXPLAIN that my post wasn't some other post.

...But of course stubborn Old Grammie set in her ways refuses to admit she made a mistake...which would explain her Love for President Bush!

...And Chickens...

Why is it when the Olber-Obsessed are proven wrong they always say, "Oh, I obviously hit a nerve with that guy..."

Not exactly.

It's just curious how being wrong, lying, and exaggerating is all okay as long as you are doing it to defame someone who does the same thing.

That makes you a hypocrite!

And Brandon, how 'bout that top 12 list?

Did you go back and reread it? Feel stupid now. I know I know, you just kidding to see if anyone would catch it?

I think this site has it all wrong. I think you guys are jealous of Olbermann because he gets away with what you try to get away with.

You do the same things he does, but he does it better than you!

Olbermann is your guys' hero!

How else can you explain your lying, exaggerating, and hypocrisy?

My God 'You People' are dumb!

Olbermann is our hero because he lies, exaggerates and is a hypocrite? No, he's really not. But he's your God, Idol, imaginary boyfriend, all rolled into one. And you have the nerve to call us dumb? Keep spinning. It's amusing to say the least. Although I think you're time would be better spent saving up for decent transportation, either going back to school and earning your GED or managing to find your way out of college, and obtaining better employment so you don't have to live in a slum. Just a thought.

You all must excuse me for a while. The last time I was the focused attention of so many virile young men was at the Civil War Debutantes Ball.

For the moment, I am furiously fanning my face while my eyes are demurely cast down with only a fleeting seductive flashing glance upwards.

I really must go! I feel a swooon coming on.

Grammie

I really must go! I feel a swooon coming on.

Grammie

Posted by: Janet Hawkins at April 4, 2007 11:08 PM

Are you sure you're not just fainting from boredom from reading incoherent rants from this chicken blogger?

sheesh...

The Olbyloons are experts in the long, incoherent ranting and raving posts. I swear 99.9% of Olbermann's fan base reside in lunatic asylums. Apparently it's free internet access night at the "home".

"...And Chickens...
Posted by: at April 4, 2007 10:54 PM"

A text book example of pick, choose and ignore for the KO syncophants. It proves that that his acolytes have learned, and learned very well, how to lie through their teeth while claiming the moral high ground.

I thought I had hit a nerve, but this exhibition proves that I hit a nerve.

Grammie

Oh ChickenHawkins Where Do I Begin?

Let's see...claim the high ground? I've never claimed the high ground.

But I do have documented proof of you and Rico (the Prince of Buttf---) high-fiving each other while actually saying 'The High Ground is Rightfully Ours.' Curious to say the least.

Typical trait of the Olber-Obsessed, Accuse others of doing what you are trying, but sadly incapable of doing.

Pick, Choose, and Ignore? This from the Bag Lady that wrongly attributed words not my own? Well, at least I'm using your own words against you, not words you made up like you tried with me.

And No, Janet ChickenHawkins, using arcane words like 'syncophant' and 'acolyte' doesn't impress anyone with how smart you are. I know you like to throw in the fancy words when you are running low on actual thoughts. Doesn't work with me, though.

And prove I've lied a single time, like I repeatedly proved that you lie. Oh, you can't be trouble with proof? That explains everything!

And No Cecelia, Grammie, and Brandon, just because the three of you together don't understand what I wrote doesn't mean it is incoherent. It just means you don't understand it. Much the same way the possum doesn't understand the tire squeezing it's guts out on the back-country road Grammie lives on.

Now, Brandon, why would I idolize someone who I've branded a liar and hypocrite?

Also, Brandon, have you explained sufficiently why you mistook the 1-12 post as being pro-liberal? Actually lashing out against it before realizing it's anti-liberal. Glad you're not on the front lines, that's a friendly fire incident waiting to happen.

Is it because you are an idiot?

Is it because you employ selective reading?

Is it because you read the first couple lines of a post and feel you've got it all figured out?

Perhaps it's a combination of all those things.

You actually use the contraction 'you're' in place of your (I know it's all very complicated for you) and you say I am in need of a GED? Maybe you can explain it away by saying it was a typo. A typo made you use the wrong word. Yeah right.

Wow....incredible.

You guys ARE really that stupid.

Your insults might have their intended effect if you'd buoy them with a little substance, but like this site, you're just throwing sh-t on the wall and seeing what sticks.

At least you've found your calling in life...

Grammie's High Ground:
(...or is Grammie just High?)

>When's the last time you got arrested after being butt f---ed?
Posted by: Rico at January 14, 2007 6:55 PM

>Rico, come on. That last comment was beneath you and out of line. Remember, slicing with a scapel is more painful than bludgeoning with a broadaxe. It also gives you the high ground, which by right, is ours anyway.
Janet Hawkins
AKA Grammie
Posted by: Janet Hawkins at January 14, 2007 7:07 PM

I didn't misread it. It was senseless to begin with, just like your incoherent, rambling posts. Dorrie/Kathy/OrinEnglish or whatever name it is you're using today on the internets to defend your imaginary boyfriend.

P.S.--don't forget to feed the cats.

He has to cover this story now...he can not possibly be that obtuse! Although...it is amazing he has completely spiked the story to begin with.
I'll bet it will be one of those "canned/pre-recorded" reports without him needing to comment or have a guest.
Posted by: Save the Cats! at April 4, 2007 4:49 PM

I am happy I guessed correctly & the hostages are back home safe!

"...using arcane words like 'syncophant' and 'acolyte'"

LOL! Arcane words (LOL!)... that's a good one. I think by "fancy words" you must have meant words with more than one syllable (because arcane they ain't... unless you meant arcane to an Olbyloon).

Actually, I meant ARCHAIC JohnE...

See, people CAN admit when they make a mistake, unlike some folks here...

And I'm sure Grammie uses words like 'syncophant' and 'acolyte' in her everyday language.

Yes, everyone knows what they mean, and everyone also knows why grammie used those words....to show us just how smart she is...

...And I don't judge words by counting how many syllables they have (like you...)

...So when you get done laughing out loud to yourself (easily amused are we?) perhaps you can keep track of how many times 'syncophant' and 'acolyte' pop up in ALL the reading you do today and report your findings back to me.

You DO read don't you?

Brandon’s debating technique:

Ignore what the person says (especially if they’ve pointed out a lie or mistake you’ve made).

Say the person loves KO even if they say they can’t stand KO. They must be either lying or mistaken, because EVERYONE loves KO. It’s just some people are in the KO Closet, like Brandon.

Call the person names. The more ‘grade school’ the name the better.

Call the person Crazy. Everyone who disagrees with him is ‘Crazy.’

FYI Brandon, since you are obviously not a member of Mensa, let me point something out to you. A key feature of Insanity is thinking ‘everyone else is crazy’ while believing you are the only sane one. Take your Meds and go back to sleep. Your pitiful existence will be over soon enough…putting all of US out of OUR misery.

Au contraire dear "Anonymous". The hallucination that everyone is one person is a standard Olbyloon tactic. But in your case, it happens to be true. We know who you are. We also know what you are: nuts. Tell me, will you get to spend Easter at home on a weekend pass or will you spend it in the lunatic asylum with your little Olbyloon friends? And I'm not planning on going anywhere. And I will continue to document the lunacy of the Olbyloons becauase it's just so darn amusing to me. Freaks on Parade for sure.

>The hallucination that everyone is one person is a standard Olbyloon tactic.

Now Jeff and Joker are Olbyloons? You might be on to something.

>We know who you are.

Okay, let's hear it, tell me 'who I am.'

>with your little Olbyloon friends?

Like I said, to you...Everyone's an Olbyloon. Shamelessly proving my point...again.

>document the lunacy of the Olbyloons becauase it's just so darn amusing to me

Simple pleasures for simple minds.

I'm glad you are getting such a kick out of making yourself look foolish. That means we're all having fun!

Go ahead and come out of the closet Brandon. You watch, talk about, think about, and write about Olbermann 10 times more than I or anyone else here does.

C'mon there's no shame in admitting you are infatuated with a man. Perhaps you can get the phone number of Ted Haggard's 'rehab.'

"I didn't misread it. It was senseless to begin with..."

Just because you can't make sense of something doesn't make it 'senseless.'

>I didn't misread it. It was senseless to begin with..

>Deny, minimize, apologize. Repeat.

>I didn't misread it. It was senseless to begin with..

>Deny, minimize, apologize. Repeat.

YOU wrote the Olbyloon playbook Brandon...That's how you can recite it chapter and verse...

Oh dear. Chicken Blogger, one of our syncophantic acolytes, is distressed at my use of syncophant and acolyte.

There you go, JohnE. In the course of your reading today you have two examples of someone using both syncophant and acolyte. OOps, that makes three.:)

Grammie

Hey Brandon, since you 'Know who I am' perhaps you can republish all my posts that illustrate my 'support' & 'love' & 'worship' of Olbermann.

...And, no, bashing you and your minions isn't 'supporting' Olbermann. That's just a bit of 'Olbylogic' you've perfected in your quest to 'Know thy Enemy.'

Uh Oh, Looks like Janet ChickenHawkins AKA the ‘Backwoods’ Grammie has been hitting the sauce again…

Quick- someone turn off her microphone before she embarrasses herself again.

Actually, on second thought, let her talk. She is pretty funny when she’s like this, and, after all, she’s probably not going to be around much longer…

Go ahead, Tell us oh wise and wrinkled one…

>Tell us about how you are religious in every respect except for the part about the ‘God’ and the ‘Going to Church’ stuff. Sure, all the Bigotry, Hypocrisy, and Narrow Mindedness without the Salvation…Seems like a good idea…

>Tell us about how you happened upon this site. After an all-night bender of drinking and eating sausages right out of the package you mistyped “www.oldermenwatch.com” after trying to lick the grease off your sausage fingers…

>Tell us about your life on your Chickenfarm and how you can’t tell one chicken’s clucking and crapping from another…

>Tell us about how, to this day, you keep your late husbands balls in a box in your underwear drawer. He’s dead Grammie, at least give him back his dignity in death…

>Or maybe just tell us about the ‘High Ground’ you like to talk about so much…

Go ahead Grammie, Tell us ALL about it…

We’re ‘all ears’ just like your president Mr. Chucklenuts…

"...So when you get done laughing out loud to yourself (easily amused are we?).....

Posted by: at April 5, 2007 1:21 PM"

Chicken Blogger, funny you should mention that. I was just thinking how very easily you amuse us all when you are trying so hard to be serious.

I can't wait to find out how amusing you are when you try.

Grammie

Oh dear, I have struck a nerve, haven't I.

Grammie

I think you just found out...

Oh dear, I have struck a nerve, haven't I.

Grammie
Posted by: Janet Hawkins at April 5, 2007 3:34 PM

Actually you've become a stuck record...

It also gives you the high ground, which by right, is ours anyway.

Janet Hawkins

Brandon, don't worry, lil mikey has "branded me a liar and a hypocrite" also. That is a direct quote he made to me the other day, too funny! Did it hurt when you got your brand? Mine is still a little tender and I can't keep the flys off of it. Do you have any suggestions?

"I think you just found out...
Posted by: at April 5, 2007 3:35 PM "

"Actually you've become a stuck record...
Posted by: at April 5, 2007 3:36 PM"

You are a scream, Chicken Blogger!

Jay Leno, loook out! Here comes Chicken Blogger.

Grammie

Oh dear, I have struck a nerve, haven't I.

Grammie
Posted by: Janet Hawkins at April 5, 2007 3:34 PM

I realize that's about all you can say in reponse, but don't give yourself so much credit...

FYI- People viciously insult each other repeatedly here without much regard for what's being flung in either direction....

I'm typing with a great big smile on my face, Grannie, I hope you are too...

I certainly didn't set the table here so...

'When in Rome'....

"I think you just found out...
Posted by: at April 5, 2007 3:35 PM "

"Actually you've become a stuck record...
Posted by: at April 5, 2007 3:36 PM"

You are a scream, Chicken Blogger!

Jay Leno, loook out! Here comes Chicken Blogger.

Grammie
Posted by: Janet Hawkins at April 5, 2007 3:41 PM

That's all you got?

I'm dissappointed....

One doesn't have to go too far up the thread to see your feable attempts at humor...

"Mine is still a little tender and I can't keep the flys off of it..."

That's not a 'brand' Jeff, that's your a--hole...

And I suggest a shower or bath soon, it might cut down on the flies...

But then again, someone who spends so much time with horses, perhaps not...

"Actually, I meant ARCHAIC JohnE..."

Actually, I don't think archaic is applicable either... 'sycophant' and 'acolyte' are perfectly acceptable words in current use today. When she says sycophant think ass-kisser and when she says acolyte think Olbyloon. ;-)

Does Archaic mean 'Unacceptable' to you?

When she says sycophant and acolyte all I can think is 'pretentious.'

And if she's calling me an 'Olbyloon' all I can think is 'Wrong again.'

Grammie is definitely Archaic in every sense of the word.

Well, Chicken Blogger, someone has to keep the memory of M Schultz and THE Mrs. Adrian R Phillips alive.

Grammie

Kiss Ass?

Are you kidding me?

Jeff and Factor come on here and talk about 'The Great One O'Reilly' and 'The Great Michael Savage.'

And I'm the ass kisser?

C'mon Brandon, you've got my IP address, I'm on Comcast, so it's a static address if you know what that means...

Show everyone how much I kiss Olbermann's Ass. Show everyone how much I Looooooove Olbermann.

I'm typing with a great big smile on my face, Grannie, I hope you are too...

I certainly didn't set the table here so...

'When in Rome'....

Posted by: at April 5, 2007 3:45 PM
I would be willing to bet your blood pressure is off the chart right now, like the other night when everyone was "ganging up on you," as you put it.

The only thing you'll find out about me is that I loooooooove arguing with Cecelia.

It does get a little tedious having to walk her through my argument over and over again so she can fully appreciate exactly how wrong she is, but in the end, when she admits it, it's all worth it... :D

I would be willing to bet your blood pressure is off the chart right now, like the other night when everyone was "ganging up on you," as you put it.
Posted by: royalking at April 5, 2007 4:02 PM

I can't decide if being accused of being Mike is funnier for me or more embarrassing for you...

I gotta run now kids...

Argue amongst yourselves....

(That's me trying to be pretentious) ; )

I am so amused by all these, in their own minds, deadly barbed jabs that I am old, archaic, shrivelled, dryed up etc.

IF and when they grow up they will realize the ultimate victory is oo, oo, oo, oo STAYING ALIVE.

Hey, fool, go ahead and be my guest. Die in your youth and, nope never any glory there, and I'll limp on over and put some shrivelled flowers on your grave.

However, don't expect any flowers for your balls. In response to the same comment you made months ago, I told you that even if your wife buried you in a shoe box she would still have plenty of room to take your balls out of her purse and let you have them back.

With the months of additional exposure to you I have come to realise that you don't have any. Balls, that is. Poor Mrs Chicken.

Oh! Poor Mr Chicken wanna be a Rooster, too. Had to add that lest I offend anyone with my lack of compassion.

Grammie

Show everyone how much I kiss Olbermann's Ass. Show everyone how much I Looooooove Olbermann.

Posted by: at April 5, 2007 4:01 PM
You're showing it right now, loon.

I can't decide if being accused of being Mike is funnier for me or more embarrassing for you...

Posted by: at April 5, 2007 4:08 PM
Who said anything about lil mikey? lil mikey....

Oh! Poor Mr Chicken wanna be a Rooster, too. Had to add that lest I offend anyone with my lack of compassion.

Grammie

Posted by: Janet Hawkins at April 5, 2007 4:23 PM
Could it be any more obvious who that is Janet? He is very upset and has been shamed into going underground/anon. To make a feeble attempt at trying to prove he is not completely insane,i.e. responding to his own posts, he will pop in and use his "real" name. He also admitted to "love" arguing with Cecelia. Another dead give away. Brandon has debunked him, he now calles him names and tries to ridicule him. You have debunked him, he does the same to you, anonomously, most of the time. I have debunked him, well, I am a moron, in case you haven't noticed. Cecelia has debunked him several times, and he stooped as low as to call her a "sanctimonious bitch" at least 3 times. Sharon has debunked him, as well. I honestly don't remember if he has called her any names,but, if I had to guess, he probably has. I wonder if he has 2 pc's in his house in separate rooms so he can run back and forth responding to his own posts?

Being branded doesn't bother me a bit. I consider the source. Olbermann's flying monkeys are a source of amusement for me. I enjoy putting their insanity out there on full display for the world to see, much as we did the other week with little "Dorrie". Funny, you know, Olbermann hasn't protested that stalker story. Wonder why?

>Being branded doesn't bother me a bit. I consider the source.

I do the same thing when you drag out the tired old 'Olbyloon' label without any evidence.

>I am so amused by all these, in their own minds, deadly barbed jabs that I am old, archaic, shrivelled, dryed up etc.

I never called you shrivelled or dried up, but hey, if the wrinkled skin fits, wear it...

>IF and when they grow up they will realize the ultimate victory is oo, oo, oo, oo STAYING ALIVE.

No Grammie, the ultimate victory is NOT staying alive, it's living well. I would think someone at your, let's just say 'advanced' age would know that by now...

>Hey, fool, go ahead and be my guest. Die in your youth and, nope never any glory there, and I'll limp on over and put some shrivelled flowers on your grave.

And you guys accused me of babbling incoherently? Uh, okay, Grammie, whatever...

>However, don't expect any flowers for your balls. In response to the same comment you made months ago, I told you that even if your wife buried you in a shoe box she would still have plenty of room to take your balls out of her purse and let you have them back.

No flowers for my balls? Darn. That's gonna be a real disappointment. My wife reads your posts and thinks you're an idiot.

>With the months of additional exposure to you I have come to realise that you don't have any. Balls, that is. Poor Mrs Chicken.
Oh! Poor Mr Chicken wanna be a Rooster, too. Had to add that lest I offend anyone with my lack of compassion.

Well, to quote the brilliant mind of our resident octogenarian, "Oh my, I have touched a nerve, haven't I."

Are you sure you don't want to add anything about 'buttf---ing' or 'high ground' or how when people don't sign their name to posts you automatically get confused or about how even though Bush stumbles over his words, it's okay 'cuz you can still understand him, Etc.

C'mon Grammie-Your microphone is still on and happy hour isn't quite over yet...

C'mon Grammie-Your microphone is still on and happy hour isn't quite over yet...

Posted by: at April 5, 2007 6:31 PM
one sorry loser, you are.

one sorry loser, you are.
Posted by: royalking at April 5, 2007 6:44 PM

Yeah, I know Jeff, Grammie's a victim.

She can dish it out but she can't take it...

Sort of like the 9-11 widows that your He-Bitch Coulter was railing against. Those damn liberals trotting out the attackers that can't be attacked themselves...

See a correlation? Of course you don't...

You're a hypocritical idiot that never admits they make a mistake. Speaking of Coulter did you ever get that apology you were after from Johnny about the Ingraham clip? No? Still waiting? Thought so...

Coulter's got the biggest damn annie's apple on the planet...

BTW wasn't it Grammie herself that was accusing Mike of being soooooo sensitive...

You're a hypocritical idiot that never admits they make a mistake. Speaking of Coulter did you ever get that apology you were after from Johnny about the Ingraham clip? No? Still waiting? Thought so...

Coulter's got the biggest damn annie's apple on the planet...

Posted by: at April 5, 2007 6:55 PM
You can run, but, you can't hide lil puke faced mikey...

Coulter's got the biggest damn annie's apple on the planet...

Posted by: at April 5, 2007 6:55 PM
Sounds like lil puke faced mikey has a crush on Ann Coulter.

"Sounds like lil puke faced mikey has a crush on Ann Coulter."

Oh what the hell... I haven't picked a fight in a while and Royal King is ALWAYS a fair target! That was Mike's way of showing contempt RK. You mistake it for love because your mother spoke to you that way when she realized what a hideous little monster she produced.

Actually craigs, that wasn't Mike that posted that, but you were right about the intention.

...and you're right about Royal Jack-Off...

You have to give him credit, though, he is quite the debater...

In fact, judging from his posts, he might just be a master debater.

"Actually craigs, that wasn't Mike that posted that, but you were right about the intention."

ooops, my bad.

Actually craigs, that wasn't Mike that posted that, but you were right about the intention.

...and you're right about Royal Jack-Off...

You have to give him credit, though, he is quite the debater...

In fact, judging from his posts, he might just be a master debater.

Posted by: at April 5, 2007 9:57 PM
No, he was right, it was lil mikey hiding behind "anon" the coward that he is.

Jeff/RoyalKing AKA moron: "it was lil mikey hiding behind "anon" the coward that he is".

Well blow me down...I just checked in on THIS thread for the first time ever, and lo and behold...it appears, according to the site moron, that I've been posting anonomously on THIS thread as well.

Apparently, I've been REALLY busy!

WHY can't I ever remember doing this stuff???

WHY can't I ever remember doing this stuff???

Posted by: Mike at April 6, 2007 12:36 AM
You're asking us? Drugs? Alcohol? Just a couple educated guesses.