Olby's giving us another installment of great moments in journalism - Paris Hilton's cavity search (or not). This is unbelievable, even for Olby.

I’ve reached the conclusion that this site provides a valuable service for Cons and Neocons alike…akin to a suicide hotline.

Sure, no one likes to hear bad news about the Iraq war (just tune into Faux News-they won’t be covering it). No one wants to acknowledge our government could be using the fear of terrorism against us, although we all know they are willing and more than able. No one likes to hear about anything our country might be doing wrong, although we all know it’s quite possible and in all likelihood, plausible.

So, after Cecelia, Cee, Grammie, Brandon, Factor, and their ilk watch an episode of Countdown and begin to doubt their own political allegiances and beliefs, where do they turn? Olbermannwatch, of course.

Once here, to make them feel so much better about themselves and their country they are treated with a recap filled with the following language:

“barked spiel carnival barker fashion A-Mess-NBC The Hour of Spin Floyd-the-Barber Edward R Olbermann Krazy Keith Keithy yada yada yada Fat Ass OlbyPlanet sock puppet tinfoilhattery Herr Olbermahn dimwit conspiracy theories there's Bathtub Boy infamous deplorable OlbyLogic moron! repellent Olbermann hateful diatribe verbal filth creepy Michael Musto The dog didn't bark Monkeymann Tehran buddy A-Jad Olbermoronn gloated slovenly partisan hack Edward R Olbermann partisan biased”

Oh, yes- Mother’s milk to make the hurting go away. Johnny Dollar leveling claims of partisanship and bias? Give me a break, Mr. Faux News Channel. Unfortunately, what Johnny, Cee, Cecelia and others fail to grasp is that they are no different than the ‘Liberal’ posters they rail against. They are merely the flipside of the same old tarnished well-worn partisan coin that won’t buy an ounce of goodwill for the American people.

Sure, Olbermann is partisan and biased. Go look in the mirror, so are you! Sure he says he is not biased. Again, go look in the mirror, so do you! Any claim I’ve heard leveled against Olbermann on this site can be made against any number of right wing pundits and the posters themselves. Johnny used to cry foul when someone would bring up ‘O’Rushity’ in defense of Olbermann. Sure I’d cry foul too if someone was to point out the double standard.

So, kudos to Olbermann Watch for providing Cons and Neocons alike with an invaluable service. After you get done watching Countdown and feel all evil and icky inside for being a ‘fake’ conservative, just turn to OW for your daily affirmation. I’m guessing OW has saved more than a few Right Wingers from hanging from their shower rod.

Posted by: Commission Accomplished! at June 6, 2007 10:00 PM

At least opposing opinions are heard here. Can the same be said for your hero, the jock sniffer’s, show?

Great thanks.

Pelosi appointed a crook
Many bribes that Jefferson took
He couldn't refuse
For Keith, that's not news
Instead felon John Dean and his "book"

Let's just educate Commission Accomplished and assume he/she is new here and not just stupid. What Olby claims to be and how he operates is where the hypocrisy lies. You gave reasons for why regulars come here; what is your excuse?

He's not new. He's also known as LMAO.

John Dean finds a gig wherever he can
From Tricky Dick to Olbermann
First he's shyster to the President
Then trained monkey for the resident
Unhinged Groucho look-alike comedian

The Truth chooses to dissent
But it will not make a dent
The 43rd Reich will come for him tonight
Bush Stormtroopers to make him see the light
All unhinged ones will be made to repent

First, my blood pressure has now gone back to being normal now that Johnny $ is back!! No one does the review of the HOUR OF SPIN like you do Johnny!! Again, GREAT THANKS!

Second, it's obvious that Mr TRUTH has had this essay on hold ready for publication for some time although I'm convinced that he probably has already let it out on some left nut blog. But it's so obvious that this left nut job just has absolutely no idea what he's talking about! Take habeas corpus as an example. Prisoners of war typically are not entitled to habeas corpus. Terrorists are NOT in uniform and therefore DO NOT fall under the habeas statute. I know that noted legal experts sucha s Edward R Olbermannn have insisted they do but unfortunately this great barrister has no idea what he's talking about! I could pick apart ALL of the absurd things that MR TRUTH has listed but honestly I don't have time on my hands as he apparently does but I'm sure someone will. In the meantime, MT please get a life!

>First, my blood pressure has now gone back to being normal now that Johnny $ is back!! No one does the review of the HOUR OF SPIN like you do Johnny!! Again, GREAT THANKS!

Thanks for proving my point, Paul.

Were you on suicide watch as well when J$ was away? Just can't make it through the day without a third party 'interpreting' a tv show for you.

Try thinking for yourself, it won't hurt too much...

>He's not new. He's also known as LMAO.
Posted by: johnny dollar at June 6, 2007 11:36 PM

...And you're also known as 'Johnny Fraud.'

>Let's just educate Commission Accomplished and assume he/she is new here and not just stupid. What Olby claims to be and how he operates is where the hypocrisy lies. You gave reasons for why regulars come here; what is your excuse?
Posted by: at June 6, 2007 11:22 PM

Anonydumbass, I come here to make fun of you...

I addressed your response in my post. Perhaps you were too busy thinking I am stupid to actually comprehend it.

The only thing more blatantly partisan, biased, hypocritical, and idiotic than KO are the guys that run this website.

No wonder they're so jealous...

KO makes a whole helluva lot more money.

And I'm a REAL conservative...

Not the Chimpy McFlightsuit brand of conservative that even the GOP has turned their back on.

>At least opposing opinions are heard here. Can the same be said for your hero, the jock sniffer’s, show?

Posted by: Wheres my hair piece? at June 6, 2007 10:34 PM

The fact that you think Keith is 'my hero' just proves my point once again.

I really don't expect you to read or comprehend very well, but just pulling stuff out of your ass, well that's always expected here!

And you consider yourself a "real conservative" because...

"He's not new. He's also known as LMAO.
Posted by: johnny dollar at June 6, 2007 11:36 PM "

That's LMAO @ 1:18 AM alright.

Now that he has been outed he is letting it all hang out again!

It has never ceased to amaze me that some feel compelled to have anonymity from already anonymous names.

Grammie

J$, I've been swooning!!!!! Welcome back.

It's funny how Johnny has felt the need to 'out' a critic supposedly posting under another name more than once....but when this total moron who happened to be on his side kept falsely accusing another critic of posting under a gazillion other names, he chose to remain silent.

This site is much like 'Fox'...yes, it does 'allow' disenting opinions...but "fair and balanced" it ain't!

Paul sez: "Take Habeas Corpus as an example. Prisoners of war are not typically entitled to Habeas Corpus"

Maybe not, but they ARE 'typically' entitled to Geneva Convention protections, and this administration has shreaded those standards as well....or did you conveniently forget about that?

"So, after Cecelia, Cee, Grammie, Brandon, Factor, and their ilk watch an episode of Countdown and begin to doubt their own political allegiances and beliefs, where do they turn? Olbermannwatch, of course."

####
I have never watched COUNTDOWN....I have basic cable, only watch my local news out of NYC and READ my news online....This site serves as entertainment for me to see the unhinged left slobber all over pablum spewed by a leftist propagandist. I will go to the MSNBC website and read portions of transcripts or watch streaming video of COUNTDOWN when I want to see what J$ and the other commentators are talking about....but I really enjoy seeing the same old leftist nonthinkers try to rehabilitate the fraud that is Olbermann.

No, COUNTDOWN is not worth 60 minutes of my time....I spend it with my family....I read and post here during breaks in my day and find it interesting that people actually take Olbermann seriously as a journalist....after so many examples that prove he is a partisan synchophant with NO ability to tell the truth about any subject involving politics or government.

"He's not new. He's also known as LMAO."

###
Thanks J$....I see that those who support Olbermann are just as cowardly and dishonest...Changing posting names is an immature and pathetic practice that reflects a character who cannot stand up to debate. The context of a poster's previous rants is important in responding properly to them and I, like Grammie, Cecelia, Mike and many others allow the context by NOT changing our ID's......try being honest LMAO and Professor Honeydew (Bob).....it will be a pleasant experience.

And this is my post today, the 1,499th day since the declaration of Mission Accomplished in Iraq.....

I am cee, good night and good luck.

"I'd tell you that the Democrats are talking a good game, but they're not even doing that. Everybody in Congress has to understand something: If they continue to fund this war, it's not just the President who owns it. They own it, too." Sgt. Liam Madden

"There were a few tense moments, however, including an encounter involving Joshua Sparling, 25, who was on crutches and who said he was a corporal with the 82nd Airborne Division and lost his right leg below the knee in Ramadi, Iraq. Mr. Sparling spoke at a smaller rally held earlier in the day at the United States Navy Memorial, and voiced his support for the administration's policies in Iraq. Later, as antiwar protesters passed where he and his group were standing, words were exchanged and one of the antiwar protestors spit at the ground near Mr. Sparling; he spit back." NYT 1/28/07

"I think the Vietnamese are better off in Vietnam," George McGovern - NEWSWEEK

"Lefties: Leave these pathetic drowning rats alone to stew in each other's juices. Get yourselves out in the street and fight this criminal administration in ways that really mean something, and that are noted by more than a handful of keyboard heroes!" Sir Loin of Beef

"American liberals need to face these truths: The demand for self-government was and remains strong in Iraq despite all our mistakes and the violent efforts of al Qaeda, Sunni insurgents and Shiite militias to disrupt it." DEMOCRAT Bob Kerrey

J$

Great Review - Welcome Back! (Ding!)

"Another meeting of the Olbermann Criminal Rehabilitation Program, with convicted felon John Dean there to discuss the merits of "law and order". Believe it or not, it's another day about Scooter Libby and the possibility of a pardon"

Why not refer to "convicted felon" Scooter Libby, as you did for Dean? This is the same partisan spin you always accuse Olbermann of.

I just love the outpouring of sympathy and outrage coming from the right in regard to Scooter's well-deserved ordeal - he's become your Tiny Tim. The ghost has shown you his rough crutch leaning in the corner of Cheney's office, and your sadness brings me joy.

"Why not refer to "convicted felon" Scooter Libby, as you did for Dean?"

Because Scooter Libby isn't a disbarred attorney posing as a "legal expert" on primetime television.

Correct, merkle. And also because everybody knows Libby is a convicted felon--he was just sentenced, as we hear night after night on The Hour of Spin. But most people don't realize that John Dean is a felon, a disbarred lawyer, and spent his time in the house of many doors. And Olbermann NEVER tells them.

Johnny: Does your relentless & reduntant harping about John Dean being a convicted felon mean that, in your opinion, Scooter Libby could never have any value as a political analyst, who truly understands the inside workings of power....35 years from now?

I don't know about you, but I've love to know what Scooter Libby knows....just as I like to hear John Dean's perspective.

No it means that "news" programs are supposed to give full disclosure. When you are bringing on a disbarred lawyer and convicted felon to discuss issues of law and order (!), treat the guy like he's the font of all legal knowledge, and NEVER TELL the viewers that he's a felon, a jailbird, and was disbarred... that's sleazy. Especially when the guy is there making what passes for legal commentary. Maybe it's just me, but I think the fact that he's a criminal, even more so that he was disbarred, is relevant to assessing the value of his interpretation of the law.

I might add that Countdown has repeatedly put forth the notion that the JFK terror plot is suspect because the FBI's informant has a criminal record (as is typically the case...there aren't that many ArchBishops who can infilatrate a criminal enterprise). They did this again just last night with Zsa Zsa. They did this immediately after using someone with a criminal record as an "expert" analyst!

But on OlbyPlanet, the only thing that matters is that the felon will parrot the opinions of Herr Olbermann. When a guest will do that, everything else is forgiven...and swept under the rug.

Johnny, I respect John Dean, and I repected him some 35 years ago when I watched him testify before Congress and help shed some real light on the Watergate coverup.

John Dean paid his debt to society...many years ago, something Richard Nixon never had to do (for political reasons).

Yes, I really do think 'it's just you'. I can't think of a better analyst in America who is willing to speculate about what might be going on behind those corrupted, secretive doors.

Sure Johnny...Olbermann should introduce him as; "here's John Dean, convicted felon and disbarred lawyer". What you are really saying is that he shouldn't bring him on at all!

How does Fox introduce Oliver North? Do they say; "here's Oliver North, convicted felon who's conviction was later overturned on a technicality"?....Now THAT would be "full disclosure".

another funny email from the newshole:

Hey Keith (Molly O)- Loved your story on Paris Hilton. Compared to the other stories tonight I think you are right on it with this one. It is so difficult to get the stories right with real news and I sympathyze with you. Making the libs happy is tough these days and reinventing or making up history is so much easier than covering the news. We love you Keith and keep up the good work, Paris is depending on you honey.
Diane, LA (Sent Thursday, June 07, 2007 9:15 AM)

The fan blogs are not too happy with Keithy's "handling" of Paris Hiltions vagina.

Is there anyone more phoney than Huffington? Just to let all you OlbyLoons know, she used to be a "far-rightwing" commentator until she seen the void in the left-wing alternative media- and a chance to make money there.

I hope you loons don't get too attached to her, I'm sure she'll switch sides again once she sees another chance to make money on our side.

WHAT A PHONEY

Says Commission Accomplished: "I’ve reached the conclusion that this site provides a valuable service for Cons and Neocons alike…akin to a suicide hotline."

END QUOTE

One must ask then why do you visit. Is it to defend the integrity of a lying, biased, dumbassed piece of shit like Olby or did your mommy pull her nipple out of your mouth when you reached the age of 10 and you ar having deep seated problems that you feel compelled to go where your beliefs are contrary to the reason this website was founded.

In other words, you aint even a woman, you are half-a-fag.

Says The Truth: "It's going to take decades to undo the damage this republican administration has done to our country."

END QUOTE

A. Nobody is going to read your long winded spiel. I know Olby is your hero but most here could care less about your opinion asshole.

B. I said in the late 90's we would be paying for willies mistakes for 20 years. That was before 9/11. Yes, that's right, Bill Clinton owns 95% of the rpesobsiblity for 9/11.

C. Damage. What damage. Every economic indicator is pegging the meter. You hav eit better today than ever before in this country. You are not paying a price in Iraq. People like you contribute to whining. You are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem.

D. Kill yourself or move to Cuba, Iran, Venezuela..........

Says The True Cry Baby: "3rd rate poetry supporting an administration rated as the worst ever."

END QUOTE

Rated by who? Olby? Rather? Rosie? Whoopi? Streisand? Chix wit dix?

You have to be a eunuch or a fag to have the same opinion as that lot.

>

Don't you all know that donating to the Clinton Library is a form of showing contrition? Only on Olby Planet!!!!

SM_Bich,

Thank you for your brilliant insight on Ariana Huffington. I'm going to tell all my friends just as soon as you present ANY proof of what you just postulated...

What really happened was that Huffington was a conservative, but found by living with one how screwed up the philosophy was. Her husband, like most neocons, turned out to be gay, so they divorced. She had to take a look at her political stance and she choose the right one...

Says Sir Liar of Idiot: "I just love the outpouring of sympathy and outrage coming from the right in regard to Scooter's well-deserved ordeal - he's become your Tiny Tim. The ghost has shown you his rough crutch leaning in the corner of Cheney's office, and your sadness brings me joy."

END QUOTE

I did a search on you username. You dominate a ton of left wing blogs/boards. Unless you are a quadraplegic or MS, you truely are a loser. Have you seen the light of day this week? Have you gotten more than two feet off the perimeter of your sandbox? Have you had sex in the last month? Year? Decade? Jacking off doesn't count. Are you over 40 still liing at home? Are you over 40 and still a virgin? There is something wrong with you. Nobody with a personal life even close to Goober Pyle would be on the net as much as you.

Says Average American Idiot: "Some mission accomplished, uh?"

END QUOTE

ANd what do yo have to worry about today idiot? Getting caught jacking off to internet porn? I'll ask you the same question. Have you had sex in the past decade. Do you even have a woman?

George, isn't it about time to end today's rancid, third grade level string of profanities and punch back in from your lunch break?

Says Mike: "George, isn't it about time to end today's rancid, third grade level string of profanities and punch back in from your lunch break?"

END QUOTE

At least I have a meaningful job and a productive member of society you old bitter fart. If you don't like my rantings then leave moron. I'm impressed you keep up with my time on the net. I do only post at lunch. SInce I do have a family and a personal life I don't I rarely sit on the couch before 8 week nights. You and your liberal buddies are on the net all day.

You liberals can dish it out but you can't take it. You liberals can not stand to be challenged and you damned sure can't stand someone getting in your face.

What do you call an moron such as yourself arguing on a board that you do not agree with? A loser.

Says Average American Idiot: "*Those* are the real reasons why this site is being black listed."

END QUOTE

And yet you live on this board. You never answered my question loser, do you have a woman? Wait, are you a fag? There has to be some reason you feel compelled to defend a biased, liar like Olby and a compulsion to argue with conservatives on this board. I have a big old sow hog I'd be willing to rent out to you for the weekend. You can bring Mike, Mission Accomplised..........

gw,

Everyone has a family, son. That's how new people come into the world. Perhaps your daddy should teach you where babies come from, child.

As for the "productive job", I find that difficult to believe.

And, what can't we take, boy? Knowing that an imbecile like yourself is allowed a driver's license and a voter's card? I support the rights of the handicapped...

> How does Fox introduce Oliver North?

First of all, they couldn't introduce him as a convicted felon because he isn't one. Second of all, what the hell does that have to do with Olbermann? This is OLBERMANN WATCH, not Oliver North Watch.

I did a search on you username. You dominate a ton of left wing blogs/boards. Unless you are a quadraplegic or MS, you truely are a loser. Have you seen the light of day this week? Have you gotten more than two feet off the perimeter of your sandbox? Have you had sex in the last month? Year? Decade? Jacking off doesn't count. Are you over 40 still liing at home? Are you over 40 and still a virgin? There is something wrong with you. Nobody with a personal life even close to Goober Pyle would be on the net as much as you.

Posted by: George Bush at June 7, 2007 1:26 PM

This sad cocksucker has the time and motivation to do internet research on anonymous trolls on a blog (and comes up with erronious information, no less - I almost never post elsewhere, and maybe a half-dozen times ever under this name) and has the lack of self-awareness to call ME a loser. Ironic.

His obvious manliness, however, is very impressive.

'George' sez: "At least I have a meaningful job and a productive member of society you lod bitter fart"

Thats WONDERFUL george! I understand that people with limited resources and abilities such as yourself need to have a job and be paid by others in order to be a "productive member of society".

And it's not a negative reflection on you either. Why I worked for one company in middle management for 20 years before I developed the skills and resources to make my own way in the world independant of any employer....yes George, you SHOULD be proud!

No George, the thing that is a very negative reflection on you is your profanity laced, putrid arguments that you use to attempt to demean those you disagree with. The problem is that you do this in place of making any coherent arguments whatsoever.

It doesn't work George!

Keith...I mean Commission Accomplished,

You can spend an hour posting on an Internet Blog, but don't watch your own progra...I mean Keith's program???

Back to reality..

Keith, you are not only less MAN than most woMEN...But you are also tirelessly dillusional. I don't care how much money you make... Even pathetically shallow Porn Actresses won't have anything to do with you. Why? Because you are troll... a meager, pair shaped book worm who has never had the guts to step on the REAL field of play. It is really easy satirize, criticize and bloviate... It takes true character to step out and DO SOMETHING.

You're quite simply a waste of sperm. Quit polluting my air... Move to France... Take a handful of vicodin...make that TWO handfuls and wash it down with a few cosmopolitans at your favorite "ELITE" drinking establishment in upper Manhattan... You know, the one that Brian Williams, Andrea Mitchell, Susan Sarandan and George Clooney frequent... Take a long walk on a short pier... Go down to Ground Zero and take a deep breath, repeatedly.. Go listen to your Barbara Streisand MP3's and read your latest issue of The Nation... You are such a punk...

A beautiful crop of sterotypical Bushwipes (BTW, kudos to whoever coined this wonderful term )today! There has not been a single thought, insult, or talking point from George Bush or Mike B that was not delivered first and repetitively by O'Reilly, Hannity, or Beck. The clowns here today are so much the Platonic ideal of drowning-rat fascist mind-slaves that I suspect someone is making sport of us.

SLOB seeems quite unimpressed with posters George Bush and Mike B, yet he slobbers praise all over the poster who repeatedly and robotically posts "Bushwipes" on this site (AAP). Go back and read some of AAP's posts SLOB. Next to AAP, Mike B and George Bush are intellectual titans.

(ahem!)

moron paranoid sycophant BUSHWIPES!

When nothing else works, just scream "THIS IS OLBERMANN WATCH"!

When nothing else works, just scream "THIS IS OLBERMANN WATCH"!

Posted by: Mike at June 7, 2007 9:04 PM

Or "Iraq!"

(btw-- this IS Olbermann Watch, dope.)

Cecelia, you may have missed this.

Dopey called you a 'wench'!

I think you get a medal for your jock strap that is so unique it may hold forever.

I wonder why he didn't go all the way and call you a 'bawdy wench' a la Errol Flynn movies.

We can always depend on our lovable little loonies to raise the level of discourse here. :)

Grammie

keith olberman is soooo phoney, he is quite womanly however.

I saw that, Grammie.

All in a day's work when arguing with enlightened liberals. :D

I thinks its Obvious KO has never been to Law School.......Maybe he got in the line for GEDs instead

And oh yeah......lets all remember that Clinton was convicted of purgery and obstruction of justice.......did he get 30 months in prison????? Nope......he just lost his law license.

keith olberman is soooo phoney, he is quite womanly however.

Posted by: jack bauer at June 7, 2007 11:00 PM

jack's taste in women is pretty bizzarre.

And oh yeah......lets all remember that Clinton was convicted of purgery and obstruction of justice.......did he get 30 months in prison????? Nope......he just lost his law license.

Posted by: The Raging Republican at June 7, 2007 11:30 PM

....and Libby's judge and jury found him guilty and decided that his crimes called for 2.5 years in the hoosgow. What's your point? Do you remember what country you're in?

So fighting spin with spin makes your spin right? Awesome website! psst you may want to fix a few holes in your stories, anyone who actually watches the show may actually know you're full of shit... shhhh keep spinning boys and girls and let the hate flow. woot america and my opinion is right because it is mentality. ps the rest of the world is laughing at many of you.

So fighting spin with spin makes your spin right? Posted by: AJ at June 8, 2007 10:30 AM

Great Thanks for pointing out Olbermann's "news program" is SPIN.

>Thanks J$....I see that those who support Olbermann are just as cowardly and dishonest...Changing posting names is an immature and pathetic practice that reflects a character who cannot stand up to debate. The context of a poster's previous rants is important in responding properly to them and I, like Grammie, Cecelia, Mike and many others allow the context by NOT changing our ID's......try being honest LMAO and Professor Honeydew (Bob).....it will be a pleasant experience.

High-Cee is still living in the land of Oz...

1.) Please copy and paste my 'support for Olbermann.' You've made that claim numerous times without so much as a thread of evidence.

2.) You can assume I've changed the words in the name field for whatever made up reason you want. The simple fact is I've never changed my name in the middle of a debate nor have I ever backed down from any debate.The truth is I've made several days worth of posts as 'Commission Accomplished', probably over a week's worth now. I'm not hiding from anyone or anything, especially not you and your errant conclusions. In fact, I considered disclosing the name change when I first started using 'CA' but I thought saying, 'LMAO' is now 'CA' sounded a bit too Cee-like in it's self importance. In other words, who the hell cares other than you and Johnny Scholar?

and

3.) In true hypocritical form, I see you HAVEN'T taken 'Jeff AKA Royaldouche' to task for changing his name. Oh yeah, I forgot, he's on your team. He might just be the waterboy, but he's all yours.

Take your own advice and try being 'honest' for a change. Go ahead and get back to me with my posts under either LMAO or Commission Accomplished that would lead you to believe I am a fan of Olbermann as you say I am.

I can copy and paste numerous posts that would conclude exactly the opposite.

Try thinking for yourself for a change, it will be a pleasant experience.

Yes you are High-Cee and the Mission is Still Not Accomplished...

And you consider yourself a "real conservative" because...

Posted by: James at June 7, 2007 2:12 AM

Because I'm:

Pro-Strong Military (Rumsfeld Wasn't)

Pro-Fiscal Responsiblity (Bush Isn't)

Pro-Keeping Gov't out of personal lives (Cheney Isn't)

Pro-Death Penalty (When warranted)

Pro-Small Business (Bush Isn't)

Anti-Big Government (Bush Isn't)

Anti-Abortion (Except in Extreme Cases)

And I'm a tried and true Capitalist owner of two successful businesses that I founded...

Is that enough for you James?

What about you, High Cee, would you like to weigh in on what makes a 'real' conservative?

I could go on...

Oh and let's see...

I'm a 'real' conservative because I get just as embarrassed as you SHOULD when Bush, as Maher put it, interrupts one incoherent sentence with another incoherent sentence.

And Grammie...

Just the other day you said I had some 'interesting points' in a post I made (that's slang for I know you're right but I can't admit it)...

But now that you are aware of the fact that 'Commission Accomplished' is the same person as a poster that you've had a contentious relationship with, you pile on.

Interesting...yet predictable. To you, it's more important WHO says something than WHAT is said.

How VERY PARTISAN of you...

LMAO, after you were outed I pointed out one post by you that had your LMAO hallmark and made the observation that I don't understand this compulsion for seeking even more anonymity from an already anonymous name.

I don't believe I have addressed you since your Commission Accomplished post.

So, I assume you are referring to the post I mentioned in the first paragraph re your being outed. I didn't address that to anyone, as far I remember, but copied J$ post and commented on it in general.

We obviously have opposing ideas of what constitutes piling on. Since you made the claim about me if you have any info that I haven't mentioned or have misrepresented just bring it on.

When you used your LMAO persona you always put me in mind of Patsy, our one trick Bushw$$$pes pony.

In your Commission Accomplished persona you actually made some reasonable comments that I didn't agree with but that were worth debating.

I'm open to correction if you have it.

Grammie

PS My use of interesting points was an effort to be pleasant. You hadn't attacked me so why should I attack you rather than rebut or point out the fallacy of your position or just throw in a few gratuitous insults just because. Surely you are mature enough to recognize the difference.

CA or LMAO, I should have mentioned this above. If I respond to the name rather than the view expressed how do you account for my varying reactions and treatments of:

All the 'Chicken Bloggers'?

Exchanges with VOK?

Exchanges with Craigs, our dear Major?

Grammie

Just the other day you said I had some 'interesting points' in a post I made (that's slang for I know you're right but I can't admit it)...

Good lord!

More "Code" from CA/LMAO's World Federation of Wrestling/Gladiator Theater Debate Book:

Thanks for responding: You've bested me...gggrrrrrrr...

Do you think...: You're so much smarter than me!

I appreciate you're point: I hate your guts!

Thanks: You're too much for me.

That's funny!: Just shoot me.

Good insight: You're my GOD!

Cecelia to the rescue of the verbose Grammie again!

Grammie

>LMAO, after you were outed...

First of all, I wasn't 'outed.' Using a slang term for exposing someone as being 'gay' would imply I tried to keep my LMAO posting history a secret. I have the ability to change my IP address. I did not. I wasn't hiding or running from anything.

I am not beholden to an anonymous and fictitious name. You can assign whatever motivation you like to me changing my name, but if you think it's to run from any of my previous posts, you'd be wrong, as usual.

>I pointed out one post by you that had your LMAO hallmark and made the observation that I don't understand this compulsion for seeking even more anonymity from an already anonymous name.

I'm thinking there is much you don't understand, Grammie. You can characterize it as a 'compulsion' if you like, but it's not. I often use the name field for humor, irony, or to make a point. Everyone here is anonymous. Hell, I'd put up my picture, phone number, and address if everyone else would.

The notion that because someone might change their name to distance themselves from previous posts, so that MUST be why I did it is fallacious. And just in case you hadn't noticed, I take this site A LOT LESS SERIOUSLY than you do.

>I don't believe I have addressed you since your Commission Accomplished post.

Which CA post? There's been dozens.

>So, I assume you are referring to the post I mentioned in the first paragraph re your being outed. I didn't address that to anyone, as far I remember, but copied J$ post and commented on it in general.

You write like Keith Olbermann asks questions. Long winded, circuitus and fairly nonsensical.

>We obviously have opposing ideas of what constitutes piling on.

Probably not...just whether you actually did it or not. Johnny decided it would be important for everyone to know that CA was LMAO, and then anyone who didn't care for LMAO (like High Cee) decided to chime in and assign their own reasons as to why I changed my name, and then you PILED ON. Don't take offense, piling on is what the OWer's are best at.

>Since you made the claim about me if you have any info that I haven't mentioned or have misrepresented just bring it on.

>When you used your LMAO persona you always put me in mind of Patsy, our one trick Bushw$$$pes pony.

I'm hardly a 'one trick pony.' Whether you like it or not, I do get compliments on my posts (as both LMAO and CA). AAP, love 'em or hate 'em, doesn't seem to garner much affection from either side, although I do think he does make some great points at times (in between Bu$hwipe$).

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think Cox has ever complimented AAP on any posts. In fact, I believe he's been suspended at times from posting here. In fact, I once made a post, you criticized it, then Cox complimented it, then you decided to change your mind and compliment it too (because your tin-foil hat compelled you, ring any bells?). I'll let you make up your own mind on what that constitutes.

>In your Commission Accomplished persona you actually made some reasonable comments that I didn't agree with but that were worth debating.

There aren't two different 'Personas' Grammie, that's in your head. Same writing, same thinking, same politics. You can troll the archives for inconsistencies between LMAO and CA, but it would be a fool's errand, there aren't any.

The tone I write in, like most everyone here, has to do with the current level of debate. If you want to make a mud puddle, I'll be happy to drag you through it.

Most of my posts that start a thread off, or aren't in response to anything are meant to be funny. I could see how one could take offense, if it is them I'm making fun of. But like I used to say as LMAO, I really am typing with a smile on my face. My sarcasm comes from humor, not from hatred. And OW really does ask to be made fun of every bit as much as Olbermann...perhaps more.

I'm open to correction if you have it.

Grammie

>PS My use of interesting points was an effort to be pleasant. You hadn't attacked me so why should I attack you rather than rebut or point out the fallacy of your position or just throw in a few gratuitous insults just because. Surely you are mature enough to recognize the difference.

You didn't rebut my point or point out the fallacy of my position. You just blamed Bush haters. Look Grammie, when you break out the gratuitous insults and someone calls you on it, you're very quick to play the victim card because of all the 'slings and arrows' you've endured in the past. I don't see how you can disagree with me that the acidic recaps set the tone for debate here. Yeah Yeah Yeah, I know, Keith started it...Whatever. If you're gonna walk around with your sheild up and sword drawn, expect to get attacked.

I can debate in a civil manner or I can be the biggest smart ass on this blog. It all depends on how the table is set.

When I posted as LMAO, any instance I would have liked to have spent debating, with Cecelia for example, it was spent asking her why she thought I was a woman. That's why, at one point, I could do almost nothing else but laugh at the goings on here. It was quite comical. I'm Mike, I'm a woman, I'm gay, I'm a liberal, I'm an Olbyloon. It's really quite ridiculous if you think about it: The fact that most of the OW regulars (Jeff, Brandon, Cee, Etc) can't even have a debate without framing it around Olbermann. Yes, this is OlbermannWatch. But if the debate were to only always be about Keith, wouldn't that be boring as hell and prove you guys are all obsessed? Don't you think the debate is better when REAL issues are discussed?

There are lots of posters here who are really hung up on identity. Whether you're male or female, left or right, etc. I find it interesting that nowadays, people take everything they think is wrong with the world and frame it politically. Whatever is wrong with the world, they blame the other party. I'm actually an Independent, but Cecelia once referred to me as being 'more conservative than most of the posters here including Cox.' I'd doubt it, but hey, labels are in great supply here at OW.

The oh-so-obvious unspoken truth about OW is that the regulars dislike Olbermann because he is liberal-minded and takes Bush to task. If either of those things weren't true, all his other shortcomings (hypocrisy, poor research, being orange-hued, etc) would not be of any issue at all. Anyone who criticizes OW is branded an Olbyloon. Craigs, VOK, and Mike have all been called Olbyloons.

>CA or LMAO, I should have mentioned this above. If I respond to the name rather than the view expressed how do you account for my varying reactions and treatments of:

All the 'Chicken Bloggers'?
Exchanges with VOK?
Exchanges with Craigs, our dear Major?
Grammie

Posted by: Janet Hawkins at June 8, 2007 8:14 PM

You're actually making my point. The person makes all the difference to you. You like craigs. When you KNOW it's someone posting that you don't like, the message doesn't even have a chance of getting through. If it's written by someone you like, it just might!

If my memory serves me correctly, your 'you made some interesting points' reply basically went on to say: I'd be more inclined to agree with you if the Bush haters weren't so quick to blame him for everything.

So, one knee-jerk reaction deserves another? Welcome to partisan politics c.2007.

Welcome to OlbermannWatch. Just don't take it too seriously...

And Cecelia...

World Federation of Wrestling/Gladiator?

You really need to watch less television :D

CA/LMAO/WhoeverYouAreAtAnyGivenTime, I asked you to DEMONSTRATE that I had done what you claim and you give me a book long screed of more generalized accusations.

Your LMAO persona was characterized by one or two line paragraphs with an overriding theme of ridicule and multiple assertions of how many ways you were laughing your ass off, and sometimes even Mrs LMAO was laughing her ass of with you.

Your CA persona was several paragraphs of your point of view, misguided though it was. I responded to one of those, at the FBI Arrests More Morons thread.

I responded to you once, as I recall, as I just mentioned. The next time I brought you up was in the observation post I mentioned.

All you need to do to prove YOUR ALLEGATION AGAINST ME is to demonstrate that I treated you differently after you were exposed, if you prefer that term. You seem to believe it so, no doubt, you should have the post/posts to back it up. Finding that surely would take less time than composing a publishable size essay.

Just one example of your tendency to misstate. I said:

"Commis