I guess the only one cleared to appear by Media Matters, Al Franken, wasn't available?

Olby's coverage of this tragic live news event is God-awful at best. I cannot believe some of the gems he has come up with to describe the collapse, such as if the bridge appeared to be a toy. Steve Capus, get this clown off the air.

I think Keith is doing a great job. I mean, he's a NEWScaster, who hosts a NEWScast, and this is NEWS. He doesn't host an opinion show....why is MSNBC running commercials for Countdown that say "You are entitled to HIS opinion"? It's all hard news, MSNBC, c'mon!

Not like that Fox Noise...all they have on is opinion and spin!

Great Thanks, you've been drinking the Olby Kool-Aid. Brainwashed by Olbyspin. Oh, the horror.

This shows the character or this website...huge tragedy, bridge collapses in bumper to bumper traffic, and all this moron running the site can think about is how "good" foxnews coverage is

Keith's reporting on this disater is worthy of an Emmy.

This shows the character or this website...Didn't you mean "of?"Learn your spelling before you post there genomutt...You oralamutts arz such genuibuzzes'! Since the leftinita's don't have the tails or balls to say it I will. Amazing that the flying Imamutt' s, opps have to be PC, Imams, are in MSP. They just lost the John/Jane Doe in the concrarp. So one must think about that since after all the loononuts believe stuff like this. Sorry all True American's, the crapokiddies will be blaming BUSH.

Where's FEMA?

George Bush hates nordic people!

stupidisasstupiddoes
------------------------
Actually, the talking point I just received from the Liberal National Committee didn't mention Bush at all. We are suppose to be blaming Norm Coleman. It makes sense, I suppose. Bush really couldn't be any less liked, and his approval numbers couldn't sink any further (although I have already been proven wrong with that assessment), while Coleman is seen as vulnerable. Sorry, the rest of the FAX with the supporting arguments is just coming over. I've got to run.

I see your spelling is much better

stupidisasstupiddoe...That post didnt make ANY sense especially that part about "True Americans"...I would consider someone that has suspended Habeus Corpus, Wiretapped Innocent Americans for "National Security", Blocked the Investigation on 9/11, Lead us into an unspeakable war against a man that had no intention of harming us while letting those that did attack us go free, and allowed the politization of the Justice Department anything but a "True American"

Also, next time you deride someone for spelling...please spell check your own post, for example...Wtf does "arz such genuibuzzes'" mean? Are you too cool to spell Are with an E or are you a 14 year old girl? ArE YoU GoING To StaRT TyPiNG liKE ThIS toO!?

How can I spin this bridge collapse to blame Bush? Did Halliburton build the bridge? I guess it doesn't matter. I can just say they did even if they didn't. Wait I know!!! All the heavy machinery in the U.S. is in Iraq and that is why the bridge wasn't fixed.

>This shows the character or this website...Didn't you mean "of?"Learn your spelling before you post there genomutt...

Posted by: stupidisasstupiddoes at August 1, 2007 10:54 PM

You might notice that the 'r' key and the 'f' key are sort of close to each other on your keyboard. I think that constitutes a typing issue, not a spelling issue. So your 'learn your spelling' comment was baseless and idiotic.

It appears as though a post made by someone commenting on the petty and partisan nature of this site has struck a nerve with you.

Perhaps you should crawl back to your cave with whatever dignity you have left and masturbate yourself to sleep like you do every night.

And johnny fraud commenting on Olby's live reporting. You've got to be kidding me! So, johnny, would you be telling us all about it if you thought Keith's reporting was decent? No, you wouldn't would you. You'd just find something else to try to make fun of. That makes YOU petty and partisan. Like that's any surprise to anyone here.

Olbermann's body of experience is with scripted presentations dating back to SportsCenter. Is it such a shock to anyone that his live on-the-fly delivery wouldn't be as crisp and polished as his scripted pieces?

What's truly classic is that johnny fraud, or any other Bush supporters here would take issue with someone who occassionally doesn't find the right word or phrase or stumbles over his words in an unscripted environment.

Sound like anyone you know?

Hint: He's the WORST leader of the free world in history.

Another Hint: He interrupts one incoherent sentence with another incoherent sentence.

Times up...Got it yet?

How about when a Fox reporter interviewing a witness who said 'Shit!' on the air told the witness, 'We won't use that...'

Uh, you just did, You're on live television, idiot.

Cut!

> Is it such a shock to anyone that his live on-the-fly delivery wouldn't be as crisp and polished as his scripted pieces?

It's not a shock to any of the clear-headed readers of Olbermann Watch, especially based on his prior performance. You see, you might have missed it, but this site is called Olbermann Watch. The purpose of it is to comment on Olbermann's "performance" each night on his Hour of Spin. So when he tries to play newsman and does a lousy job at it, that's what we report.

It's telling that even the Olbypologists admit that he's not the sharpest knife in the drawer when it comes to live coverage. And then complain when we agree with them!

> johnny fraud, or any other Bush supporters here would take issue with someone who occassionally doesn't find the right word or phrase

What's truly classic is how you'll make up stuff just to deflect from the subject at hand: Olbermoronn. I'm a "Bush supporter"? Where did you get that idea? I'll tell you. You made it up! Hey, making up facts as you go along. You just might be Olby himself!!

Blame Canada!

It may seem like a quiet country where not much happens besides ice hockey, curling and beer drinking. But our neighbor to the north is proving to be quite the draw for thousands of disgruntled Americans.

The number of U.S. citizens who moved to Canada last year hit a 30-year high, with a 20 percent increase over the previous year and almost double the number who moved in 2000.

In 2006, 10,942 Americans went to Canada, compared with 9,262 in 2005 and 5,828 in 2000, according to a survey by the Association for Canadian Studies.

Of course, those numbers are still outweighed by the number of Canadians going the other way. Yet, that imbalance is shrinking. Last year, 23,913 Canadians moved to the United States, a significant decrease from 29,930 in 2005.

"There has been a definite increase in the past five years — the number hasn't exceeded 10,000 since 1977," says Jack Jedwab, the association's executive director. "During the mid-70s, Canada admitted between 22,000 and 26,000 Americans a year, most of whom were draft dodgers from the Vietnam War."

The current increase appears to be fueled largely by social and political reasons, says Jedwab, based on anecdotal evidence.

"Those who are coming have the highest level of education — these aren't people who can't get a job in the states," he says. "They're coming because many of them don't like the politics, the Iraq War and the security situation in the U.S. By comparison, Canada is a tension-free place. People feel safer."

One recent immigrant is Tom Kertes, a 34-year-old labor organizer who moved from Seattle to Toronto in April.

Kertes attributes his motivation to President Bush's opposition to gay marriage, and the tactics employed during the war on terror since 9/11.

"I wanted a country that respected my human rights and the rights of others," he says. "We joked about it after Bush won re-election, but it took us a while to go through the application."

Kertes, who moved with his partner, is happy in his new home. "Canada is a really nice country. My mother is thinking about it. My stepfather has diabetes and has health issues. So, he'd be taken care of for free if he moved up here."

Good riddens liberals. Get the F$%K OUT!!!! Take the ACLU with you and as many lawyers as you can find. Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.

NBC had Keith break in to Last Comic Standing to do a Special Report before returning to the program.

I just have to say that ALL of you, are some of the most truly PATHETIC people i have ever come across in my entire existence, and yes on both sides of this childish and mind numbing bickering.

>"It's not a shock to any of the clear-headed readers of Olbermann Watch..."

So what about Cox's thread about how Bush should be on Rushmore? I thought this was Olbermannwatch?

Instead of just denying accusations johnny, why don't you tell us all exactly how you feel about Bush?

Oh yeah, deny is all you do.

The truly petty and partisan johnny fraud never dissappoints. Never answers a direct question either.

I like how you keep describing you and your minions as 'clear-headed' and 'clear thinking' like maybe if you repeat it often enough someone will eventually believe it. You and the OW regulars are some of the most partisan people on the planet. And no, partisan does not equal clear thinking. Quite the opposite.

Speaking of 'making stuff up.' You describe me as an Olbypologist, and then say I might be Olbermann himself. Yeah, and you might have a poster-sized picture of Bill O'Reilly above your bed.

>"...deflect from the subject at hand: Olbermoronn..."

Deflect? I thought I addressed the subject at hand fairly well. Olbermann doesn't do as well live as his counterparts, and you and this site are petty and partisan.

Next?

"Hint: He's the WORST leader of the free world in history."

Jimmy Carter!

I'm suprised Olbermann didn't blame Bush.
After all it's proven a bridge can't break into 3 pieces!
So Bush had the bridge destroyed to cover up the Pat Tillman case!
Cheney and Rove did it!
In fact Rove persoanlly ran the wires!

Olby will explain this tommorow!

Jimmy Carter!

And isn't it shocking how he spends so much time monitoring elections in dangerous places in the world, going around building houses in the scam program and doing other good works? Who does he think he is showing up politicians who simply have their own self-interests at heart? The man disgusts me.

> Instead of just denying accusations johnny, why don't you tell us all exactly how you feel about Bush?

Hey, Einstein, did you ever hear about burden of proof? It's on the accuser. "Prove it didn't happen" went out with "Plan 9 from Outer Space". Either you can prove that what you say is true, or you're making it up. Unless you can cite your evidence, then you're making it up. Which kind of sounds like sort of you might be a liar. But I could be wrong. You'll show me when you back up what you claim. Right.

> You describe me as an Olbypologist

Wrong again. I never described YOU as an Olbypologist. But if you want to admit to it, that's fine with me.

I'm suprised Olbermann didn't blame Bush.

Posted by: The Joker at August 2, 2007 12:38 AM

I'm surprised you're not blaming Muslims...

Clucker,
Yes the Great Jimmy Carter.
Let Nicaraga go Marxist, almost El Salvador, Stabbed the Shah in the back, Let Cuba interven in Angola, Implemented Gas rationing, did nothing about double digit inflation, Stagnflation and 10% Unemployment!
Yp,
'Jimmy was the man!

Score another one for Gibby!

At Think Progress some posters are blaming Bush already!

>Hey, Einstein, did you ever hear about burden of proof? It's on the accuser.

Just as I thought, johnny is NOT forthcoming about his support for Bush. That should be proof enough for anyone HERE.

No, I can't PROVE you are a Bush supporter, just like you can't prove a majority of the garbage you post on this site.

So, tell me WHY you won't tell us how you feel about Bush? What are you afraid of?

> You describe me as an Olbypologist

Wrong again. I never described YOU as an Olbypologist. But if you want to admit to it, that's fine with me.

Posted by: johnny dollar at August 2, 2007 12:41 AM

Uh, let's see, you quote a post I wrote about KO's delivery and then you type this:

"It's telling that even the Olbypologists admit that he's not the sharpest knife in the drawer when it comes to live coverage. And then complain when we agree with them!"

And then say you weren't trying to characterize me as an Olbypologist?

Johnny, you might have the choir here fooled, but you are the biggest huckster on this site, and that's saying something.

I would call you a slimy snake-oil salesman, but that would imply some sort of talent, which you obviously are lacking.

You don't answer direct questions, you deny your mischaracterizations, and you only scream 'This is OlbermannWatch' when someone you perceive as liberal is making a point about something you don't want to address. And NOT when someone you perceive as conservative does the same thing.

The burden of proof has been lifted. You perpetually prove with every post you make everything I've ever said about you.

Ladies and Gentlemen, I submit to you the petty, partisan, and frankly not very bright johnny fraud.

DailyKos and Keith Olbermann are investigating the link between the bridge collapse and the Bush administration. More to follow...

Direct Questions Avoided By johnny fraud:

1.) So, johnny, would you be telling us all about it if you thought Keith's reporting was decent?

2.) So what about Cox's thread about how Bush should be on Rushmore? I thought this was Olbermannwatch?

3.) Instead of just denying accusations johnny, why don't you tell us all exactly how you feel about Bush?

4.) So, tell me WHY you won't tell us how you feel about Bush? What are you afraid of?

And that's just on one thread in 1 hour's time. Just think of all the questions johnny fraud can willfully ignore to try to save face over the course of a week, a month, a year.

Mind-numbing indeed!

DailyKos and Keith Olbermann are investigating the link between the bridge collapse and the Bush administration. More to follow...
---
Why will you not listen? I tell you, it's Norm Coleman.

Don't bring me into this.

Keith will blame Bush!

Good thing Rita Crosby wasn't on that bridge. Boxes of rocks don't float.

> You don't answer direct questions

Yeah, you make up something about me (I'm a "Bush supporter"), and when I ask you to back up what you claim, you complain that I won't answer questions. Hey, talk about not answering direct questions, how about the one I asked you. Like what's your evidence?

> johnny is NOT forthcoming about his support for Bush. That should be proof enough for anyone HERE.

Ah, that famed, anonyblogger logic. Anon doesn't have to supply any evidence for what he makes up, J$ does. And if J$ doesn't admit what Anon wants, why that's "proof" that whatever Anon makes up is true. It's almost as elegant as Olbylogic.

> No, I can't PROVE you are a Bush supporter

Oh, I see. Looks like I was correct yet again.

> And then say you weren't trying to characterize me as an Olbypologist?

Look, oh courageous anonymous one. Don't blame me if you aren't a careful reader. I choose my words carefully; it's how I make a living. If you don't read them carefully, that ain't my fault. Perhaps one of those remedial courses would help improve your comprehension skills.

You certainly don't need any further instruction in creative writing, since you've already proven that you are a champ at making stuff up out of thin air.

I remember this one time I was on a bridge. It went over water, too. I can totally understand what those people went through.

What are you afraid of, johnny? Your minions are counting on you! The clear thinkers need to know what to think. Just answer the damn questions!

Apparently johnny 'afraid' doesn't do so well unscripted either.

What a joke!

I remember this one time I was on a bridge. It went over water, too. I can totally understand what those people went through.

---

That is truly funny, and something Olbermann might say. It is also something O'Reilly might say, but it is funny. I shouldn't have added that second sentence. Now, Mr. Dollar will ask me to prove O'Reilly might say that. Too late now.

Direct Questions Avoided By johnny fraud:

1.) So, johnny, would you be telling us all about it if you thought Keith's reporting was decent?

2.) So what about Cox's thread about how Bush should be on Rushmore? I thought this was Olbermannwatch?

3.) Instead of just denying accusations johnny, why don't you tell us all exactly how you feel about Bush?

4.) So, tell me WHY you won't tell us how you feel about Bush? What are you afraid of?

C'mon johnny your people are counting on you, don't disappoint them.

They might see you for what you really are...

Suddenly the opinionated Mr. Fraud doesn't want to give his opinion on the president.

Is ANYONE surprised?

Perhaps you're afraid of being 'labeled' with the type of labels you like to throw around without a shred of evidence.

Like calling somone an 'Olbyloon' who has shown no affinity for Olbermann.

You can dish it out, but you can't take it. When someone resorts to YOUR tactics, you run like a little child.

You make a living writing?

Must not be a very good living.

You couldn't write your own obituary.

I'm dead.

Judge: johnny fraud, you stand before the court facing the accusation of being a Bush supporter, how do you plea?

johnny fraud: No contest, your honor. Although I don't contest the charge, my accuser doesn't provide any evidence that I am a Bush supporter.

Judge: Well, you are a main contributor to a site who's owner thinks Bush should be on Mt. Rushmore. You do rail against Keith Olbermann who has gained notoriety by taking the Bush administration to task. You do run a site that promotes Fox News which has gained notoriety for supporting Bush and his administration.

johnny fraud: That's all circumstantial evidence, your honor. It's all true, but you see, it doesn't really prove anything.

Accuser: I'd like to call the my one and only witness to the stand for examination. It's mr. fraud himself, your honor. I'd like to ask him a question, if you don't mind.

Judge: Go right ahead...

Accuser: So, johnny, are you a Bush supporter?

johnny fraud: (the sound of crickets chirping and the sigh of disappointment from the defendent's loyal followers)

Accuser: I rest my case....

Judge: Guilty!

I wonder if johnny is going to send 'Fox Security' to my house...

The Gestapo is coming!

The Gestapo is coming!

> Suddenly the opinionated Mr. Fraud doesn't want to give his opinion on the president.

"Suddenly"? Are you as stupid as you write? Tell me when I EVER gave my opinion on the President? What is "suddenly" about it? I'm not here to debate politics with mental pygmies. I'm not a political writer. Get it? Do I have to say it slower for you to grasp it? I write at Olbermann Watch about his bias and his lies. Not to engage cowardly anonymous trolls about Bush, Hillary, Halliburton, or whatever the latest Olbyloon diversion is.

This so frustrates the loons that they DEMAND I tell them what my politics is. And if I don't, they'll just make it up and then DEMAND I prove them wrong. Sorry, you'll have to remain frustrated. It's none of your business and if you don't like it, they're a terrific little thing called a mouse. You just click it and you'll leave this site and never have to come back.

Man, the skulls are thick on OlbyPlanet.

WOW! "mike" claims I have problems, (like he doesn't) and look at patsy. He's on a serious lunatic rage. Is it pay day in mexico, patsy?

At Think Progress some posters are blaming Bush already!

Posted by: The Joker at August 2, 2007 12:50 AM

This surprises you, how?

"... tell them what my politics is."

Yeah, you make a living writing alright!

I'm not the one frustrated, johnny fraud, it's you. Frustrated someone called you on your shell game.

Where did I 'demand' you tell me what 'your politics is (sic)'?

How am I an Olbyloon?

Proof please....

Oh yeah, I forgot you can't play by the same rules you enforce upon others.

>You just click it and you'll leave this site and never have to come back.

Yeah, if I were you, I'd want me to leave too. I like it here. You won't find more petty partisan primadonnas worthy of criticism anywhere than here.

Nerve struck.

Questions unanswered.

...because it's 'none of my business.' Very stand-up of you johnny. Someone traffics in personal attacks of Keith Olbermann and then claims HIS personal politics are 'none of my business.'

Well, isn't that a quaint little notion...

Meanwhile....

Direct Questions Avoided By johnny fraud:

1.) So, johnny, would you be telling us all about it if you thought Keith's reporting was decent?

2.) So what about Cox's thread about how Bush should be on Rushmore? I thought this was Olbermannwatch?

3.) Instead of just denying accusations johnny, why don't you tell us all exactly how you feel about Bush?

4.) So, tell me WHY you won't tell us how you feel about Bush? What are you afraid of?

C'mon johnny your people are counting on you, don't disappoint them.

They might see you for what you really are...

1. If it ever happens you'll find out.
2. What about it? My name isn't Cox.
3. Because it's none of your business, and besides it's fun to watch you make up stuff when I don't. Kind of shows your level of honesty.
4. See 3.

> I like it here.

Is there anything so sad as unrequited like?

> I like it here.

Obviously, or you wouldn't go through the trouble of posting under a dozen different names. When you're not the courageous anonymous, that is.

> I like it here.

Excellent. It's people like you that make this the #1 Keith Olbermann blog on the internet. Keep it up!

johnny fraud runs a website where he lists the drudge report as 'information' and mediamatters as 'disinformation' two very different websites with two very different political agendas.

But answering a question about whether or not he supports Bush is somehow 'off-limits' and 'none of my business.'

So, basically he wants to partake in political discourse without actually taking part in political discourse.

And, he wants everyone to think he's a good conservative, but doesn't want any of the humiliation that goes with being a Bush supporter.

Nothing like trying to have it both ways, eh, johnny.

When you try to have your cake and eat it too, you might be more wary of someone like me who takes the cake and rams it down your throat. How does that taste, eh, johnny?

Oh no, johnny, I'm not going anywhere...

1. If it ever happens you'll find out.

(Dodge) A non-answer.

2. What about it? My name isn't Cox.

(Dodge) You don't have to be Cox to answer the question. Why is it okay for NeoCons to get off-topic but not anyone else?

3. Because it's none of your business, and besides it's fun to watch you make up stuff when I don't. Kind of shows your level of honesty.

(Dodge) Yeah, I bet you're having fun. MY level of honesty? Hilarious!

4. See 3.

(Dodge) Uh, right.

Now again, what are you afraid of?

>Excellent. It's people like you that make this the #1 Keith Olbermann blog on the internet. Keep it up!

Yes, and it's people like me who expose you for what you really are, a huckster who can't even say whether he supports the president or not.

You could identify almost every poster here and tell whether they support the president or not. Why are you so afraid of being forthcoming?

Honesty isn't one of your most prevailing qualities, and neither is good writing.

Where did I 'demand' you tell me what 'your politics is (sic)'?

How am I an Olbyloon?

Proof please....

Oh yeah, I forgot you can't play by the same rules you enforce upon others.

Still waiting....

Judge: johnny fraud, you stand before the court facing the accusation of being a Bush supporter, how do you plea?

johnny fraud: No contest, your honor. Although I don't contest the charge, my accuser doesn't provide any evidence that I am a Bush supporter.

Judge: Well, you are a main contributor to a site who's owner thinks Bush should be on Mt. Rushmore. You do rail against Keith Olbermann who has gained notoriety by taking the Bush administration to task. You do run a site that promotes Fox News which has gained notoriety for supporting Bush and his administration.

johnny fraud: That's all circumstantial evidence, your honor. It's all true, but you see, it doesn't really prove anything.

Accuser: I'd like to call the my one and only witness to the stand for examination. It's mr. fraud himself, your honor. I'd like to ask him a question, if you don't mind.

Judge: Go right ahead...

Accuser: So, johnny, are you a Bush supporter?

johnny fraud: (the sound of crickets chirping and the sigh of disappointment from the defendent's loyal followers)

Accuser: I rest my case....

Judge: Guilty!

johnny fraud would like everyone to believe that he's somehow above the political fray here....

Uh, not so fast...

johnny fraud would like everyone to believe that he's just a non-political writer with no dog in the fight....

Uh, not so fast...

johnny fraud would like everyone to believe he doesn't prop up Fox News for any particular political bent, he's just doing it because it's the right thing to do...

Uh, not so fast...

johnny fraud would like everyone to believe his politics are nobody's business, even though he is a principle contributor to a site that is primarily political...

Uh, not so fast....

I KNOW you don't think your loyal followers are very bright johnny, but c'mon...

The gig is up...

Your're a petty partisan primadonna who isn't very convincing, isn't a good writer, and won't answer a direct question.

A chinese philosopher said, 'We become what we gaze upon..." and apparently that has happened with you...

YOU could be Keith Olbermann!

With the "news" Krazy Keith is doling
In his grave Ed Murrow is rolling
Keith is cavorting
Disjointed reporting
At NBC "news" they're just trolling

Keith Olberman - "Good Evening. A bridge collapses in Minnesota, killing at least ten. Suspicious timing considering the grilling of Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez in Congress. And once again we must examine "The Nexus of Political Terror".

A chinese philosopher said, 'We become what we gaze upon..."

Posted by:patsy at August 2, 2007 2:45 AM

Is that what happened to you? "Gazing upon" hate sites has made you the way you are?

Just checking in... Heh.

So, Olby's show is canceled, but there's still 50-something posts here.

Sort of like watching Fox News, a whole lot of reporting about nothing.

Sort of like watching Fox News, a whole lot of reporting about nothing.

Posted by: Dick Nixon at August 2, 2007 3:58 AM

Thanks, DICK!

Here's how you can tell how bad Olbermann really was: the flood of posters trying to defend his pitiful stammering and stuttering. He's so out of practice doing real news that he's just lost when a big live event hits. But good to see that MSNBC made his fat ass actually do some work last night, even if it was subpar. By the way, tin foil hat wearers, websites like Inside Cable News are praising Fox for being first on the scene (hey, maybe they did it!) and for having better footage than the other networks. So it's not just JD who was praising them, non-political sources, broadcast critics were also praising them. There's a reason they are number one dumbasses and it has nothing to do with their political stances but everything is political to you people. How long before the left is claiming that this is a plot by the Bush government to take attention away from Gonzalez, Tillman, etc?

Poor Olby and his circuitous, nonsensical blabbing. Unless he is scripted with propaganda, Olby is lost.

I'm waiting for Olby to call this horrible tragedy a hit job orchestrated by President Bush because Minnesotans have not completely embraced Friend of Olby (FOO) Al Franken. Olby has already claimed that the president put out a hit on Pat Tillman, so anything is possible.

Opens his bucket mouth anonymous:

"I just have to say that ALL of you, are some of the most truly PATHETIC people i have ever come across in my entire existence, and yes on both sides of this childish and mind numbing bickering. "

END QUOTE

Um, and someone that admits what you do and yet you not only read this board you take the time to post.

You are a FAGGOT.

Minneapolis US Congressman Keith Ellison born in Detroit (bwahahaha) who took his oath in DC on the Quran (Book of Hatred and Murder and RACISM). Served on the Minnesota State House elected in 02. Has aquired a notoriety for failure to pay income tax and tickets/fines resulting in multiple suspensions of his driver's license.

Well MISTER Ellison, the federal government issued a warning in 2005 that rated the structural steel a 4 out of a scale of 1 to 9 and again in 06. While the citizens of Minnesota have elected these racist and partisn pieces of shit, they paid the price last night. While this bastard has been robbing from the American people and feeding his lusts and greed and ripping our President and profoudning his luv for Allah he has failed to do his damned job.

Just like New Orleans. Just like Detraq and Atlafrica.

Yes Mr. Ellison, I blame you. I want to know what you knew and when you knew it. You are a liar sir.

Keith Ellison, disciple of Louis Farakan.

Keith Ellison, anti-semite.

Olbermoronn is incapable of forming a coherent sentence without his telepropter.

So I catch KO's sloppy act last night and can't wait to come here this morning and read the bashing. Instead, I get the loons trying to switch the debate to "how trivial is this website for picking on one newscaster"

Spare me- thats the whole point. KO is a cancer at one of the worst networks on cable/dish TV. His talent as a newsman is mediocre at best. The commercial spots in my market for MSNBC have dropped to under $20 apiece. They actually are given as addons to most media buys.

So don't tell me that MSNBC is catching the wave of public opinion. This network sold its soul to the liberal devil and it's destiny is attached to the same anchor that brought Air America down.

They should hire waitresses from hooters to deliver their bias all day. Its the only way to get back some respectablility. Heck, even Keith would sign on.

By the way, he definitely needs to hop on a treadmill. His back side is getting huge. Fat man!

Truth,

You are right about Laura's comments. I usually focus on what is being said that affects me. I condemn Laura's comments here and now.

You both should try and keep your comments above the belt. And the mason dixon line.

so does anyone think that Olberbutt will try to pin the blame for the collapsing of the bridge on President Bush tonight? He can get one of his sock puppets on to support his stupidity. He must really think that the American public is dum and that we we all believe the crap that comes out of his mouth.

If you parce out all of the racist comments, I found it interesting what LB said about Ellison and the bridge. I would certainly like to know if there is any truth behind them. Will KO investigate?

Just read the newest theories on why bridges failures are the republican's (R) fault. Full video at 8 on MSNBC.

Not making this assortment up
-global warming
-tax cuts that ravage infrastructure repair budgets

Followed by this post- (can't make this lefty dillusion shit up)-
" I do not remember these horrendous accidents happening on Clinton's watch."

Nothing on Clinton's watch?
Because from 1992 to 2000 everything was perfect. You liberals are the biggest set of pussy asses in this country. Thanks god there are republicans and Fox News!

It's pretty funny (in a sad and sick way) to see the breathless coverage of a bridge collapse itself collapse once it is determined that it had nothing to do with the Muslim Hoardes™. OH MY GOD!!! TWENTY PROUD STRONG AMERICANS KILLED!!! MINNESOTA'S 24th LARGEST BRIDGE IN RUINS!! THIS WILL CHANGE EVERYTHING FOREVER!!!

What was that?

No Muslims? What do you mean? NOT terrorism? But Islamofascism! Iran!

No?

Well, is Dancing with the Stars still on?

So expect KeithO to toss out these theories as facts tonight... followed by Shuster echoing his concepts... followed by the Senate holding hearings to uncover how Rove or Cheney influenced the collapse.

"Not making this assortment up
-global warming
-tax cuts that ravage infrastructure repair budgets"

Why would you think that's ridiculous, other than you belong to the party that until recently denied global warming and is responsible for infrastructure cuts under the "smaller government" meme?

How do you think bridges get repaired, brightboy, by the trolls that live under them? It's federal tax dollars. How is the inspection schedule driven? I don't know what happened in this case, but I can't think of a bigger or more easily predictable joke than you republitards trying prophylactically lampoon the idea that infrastructure repair money has anything to do with infrastructure repair.

I live in Wisconsin and I can tell you that 2006 & 2007 had very abnormally high freeze-thaw periodicity that is the basic cause of concrete degradation in the north. I know Minnesota's 2006 was in the top three warm and variable winters. I wouldn't be at all surpized if you southern retards thought this was a hillarious impossibility, but then you were laughing all the way to Bahgdad, too.

When did the Republitards regress to the scornfull know-nothings they now are?

I don't think "southern retards" is an appropriate term.

What do you suggest Southern Betty?

badger boy- Did you just proved with your biased dribble that it is the republican's fault for the bridge failing. Show me how?

All you said was that global warming does exist and that tax cuts do hurt the infrastucture? How does that place this bridge collapse on the republicans?

Your ignorance is almost as big as your blind anger. What a fucking moron.

Badger thinks that global warming is something created in 2000 right after the republicans took power in the US. He also is one of thos dellusional people that thinks that the US is solely to blame for global climate changes. Therefore Bush is the person that brought Katrina to these shores and caused the bridge to collapse. I second your statement- benson-badger is a total moron.

We need to elect a democrat to raise our taxes, and rebuild this nation's bridges! We need better bridges!

Geez badger- what have you been living under a rock?

Benson, Let me help you read it in a way that you can understand...

A - Bridges need to be repaired through tax dollars True or False?
B - The Republicans general idea behind Government spending is tax less, spend less True or False

A + B = The Bridges and Roads of this country fall out of disrepair in the past 12 years Republicans have run congress.

Do you get the point?

How does that put the blame on the reublicans?

This bridge has been on the watch list for years and if it was considered dire, don't you think it would/should have been fixed. Same with the levees in Louisiana. For 8 years under Clinton they held... he leaves office and they get hit by the Hurricane and its Bush's fault for not enhancing them. (I am not suggesting Bush's reaction to Katrina doesn't derserve critcism)

How do democratic administrations avoid blame for infrastructure failures? That is my question. You Dems are quick to blame a political party for these tragedies. Its absurd.

That's my point. I was at DailyKOs and a ton of misinformation regarding Bush and the Republican governor should carry the brunt of the blame for this. Are you kidding me?

Not to mention that Democrats are legendary for public work projects that are filled with pork and corruption. The Big Dig in Boston (D) ended up costing many times the budget AND within a couple of years it had a fatal collapse. A 50 year old bridge collapse and kooks blame Bush? WTF?

"I was at DailyKOs and a ton of misinformation regarding Bush and the Republican governor should carry the brunt of the blame for this. Are you kidding me?"

Please direct me to this "misinformation" please.

No one is blaming Bush for this. It is a tragedy that it happened. I was merely trying to point out the thought process that shows that Republican thinking is responsible for the bridge failure.

Wanna talk corrpution? At least the corruption in the Democratic party ends up helping the American people in the end...The corrpution in the Republican party (this is not definitive, its just a more pronounced trend among republicans) screws the American people by giving corporations breaks at a cost to the American people.

>>>>>badger boy- Did you just proved with your biased dribble that it is the republican's fault for the bridge failing. Show me how?>>>>>>>

No, foamy, if you can calm down enough to get your tenses right it might help. I didn't say it was their fault. I said you guys are ridiculous for discarding out of hand the rational human causes that might lay behind the tragedy.

>>>>>All you said was that global warming does exist and that tax cuts do hurt the infrastucture? How does that place this bridge collapse on the republicans?>>>>>

It doesn't, dumbass. You or your side was the one who were claiming that the left would claim this. We aren't. But you are an idiot for allowing politics to make you see things that are perfectly legitimate causes (infrastructure funds, GW) as jokes.

Go to DailyKOs and the String on the Bridge- read post after post from loons talking about how it is Bush's environmental policies and tax cuts that brought this bridge down. I did not make this lunacy up. The freaks believe it!

Some even think its related to a "Tillman Bad News" coverup... pulease.

Badger- I just cited the website where your lefty friends are claiming this. So shaddup with your "We aren't" statement. I don't think ALL democrats think this- but the mere fact that some do is assinine. Bush is not to blame for this tragedy... but some freaks at DailyKOs are claiming so.

Olbermann is as deep intellectually as a thimble of merlot. His ass, however, is an expanse to be proud of.

Ode to Johnny Fraud

My favorite huckster at OW who likes to light the match and then scurry away like a cockroach when the heated debate turns too ‘political’ for him.

________________________________________________

He says he ‘Chooses his words carefully’
Yeah, Johnny, most liars do…
But when you are asked a direct question
Then I guess no words will have to do

Johnny is an ill-informed fraud
Blinded by his own hate
For someone who rails against KO daily
He sure is afraid of political debate

He denies he’s a Bush supporter
But the writing is on the wall
He claims assumptions need to be proven
Or shouldn’t be uttered at all

Johnny suggests I should leave
Then says it’s good that I stay
Maybe he’s a classic schizophrenic
Which way does the wind blow today?

The fraud likes to call people an ‘Olbyloon’
Without a shred of evidence
But when the light of truth shines on him
Pleading the 5th is his only defense

He claims it’s ‘nobody’s business’
The oldest trick in the book
But now the curtain is pulled back
Go ahead, NeoCons, take a look…

Why does he hide his support for Bush?
The answer is plain to see
To be forthcoming in his support for Bush
Would shatter the illusion of credibility

Your hero Johnny is running
With exactly zero answers in sight
He demands ‘proof’ he supports Bush
Even though everyone knows I’m right

Wow! Google "Bridge disasters" and look how many bridges Chimpy McHitlerburton and the rethuglikkkans have brought down throughout history. We are all doomed. DOOMED, I TELL YA!

It doesn't, dumbass. You or your side was the one who were claiming that the left would claim this. We aren't. But you are an idiot for allowing politics to make you see things that are perfectly legitimate causes (infrastructure funds, GW) as jokes.

Posted by: Badger at August 2, 2007 12:37 PM

See what happens when you try to speak for other loons? It bites you in the ass, you were and are dead wrong. Look at any far left wing blog, the loons are blaming Bush every where. P.S. I'm pretty sure Minn. is a state that is vastly run by (D)'s. Can you say katrina?

Yep, I can confirm the DU & Kos crowd are indeed spinning wild conspiracy theories about how the news wants to cover this bridge story instead of their favorite talking points: Tillman, Gonzalez, etc. ANd yes, they are also trying to spin the "it's the result of Bush's defunding for X, Y, and Z", "bad environmental policies" and the like. What they can't talk about was how horrid Olbermann's live coverage was last night. I couldn't decide who was worse, Olby or Paula Zahn who seemed just not to give a damn although at least she wasn't tripping over her own tongue the way Olby was. Without a pre-rehearsed spiel, he's nothing.

By the way, to the Olbyloon who wrote JD a little poem--I know exactly who you are. This is the same BerryBush/Dorrie/Psych/Orinenglish who things she's oh-so-clever and does similar things on all the Olby fan boards--at least the ones who haven't banned her for her holier-than-thou attitude and propensity for getting into blood feuds with her fellow loons. Even THEY don't want anything to do with this nut.

And yes, Fox News is winning praise for being first with the news, having the best aerial shots, and the best coverage, without stumbling, bumbling, and disinterested anchors. Suck on that you Olbyloons!

I second your statement- benson-badger is a total moron.

Posted by: at August 2, 2007 12:06 PM

I third it.

Brandon,

His verbal miscues were a little odd. I never realized he needed so many language crutches: "its, its, its" then "and, and, and."

I also notice how stunted his questions were to the field reporters. He had no idea what they were going to respond with and every response so seemed to throw him he resorted to just repeating their answer back to them.

In light that he did live play-by-play coverage oce upon a time, is he just that much of a hack outside baseball?

I'm I'm I'm um NOT a hack. Right, my good friend, Micheal Musto?

While you are perusing the lefty blogs for more bridge conspiracies... note the praise for Olbermann's coverage.
Peeee Yoooo!

"He's got such a calming voice"

"He's so good at framing the situation"

These loons are C-R-A-Z-Y. Saw the same coverage and it was very Merry Miller-esque. (Google it) (She's a better than Keith)

"I couldn't decide who was worse, Olby or Paula Zahn . . .although at least she wasn't tripping over her own tongue the way Olby was. Without a pre-rehearsed spiel, he's nothing."

Exactly, Brandon. And this poor performance (along with his lackluster performance when he was co-hosting recent debate coverage w/ Chrissie Matthews) underscores why Olby will never allow dissenting opinion on Meltdown.

To use a baseball metaphor, Olby can't hit 'em unless they are straight down the middle and over the plate . He has to know in advance what's coming or he's toast. Since he is so lazy in his prep for the show, he wouldn't know how to rebut someone who challenged him with facts that are contrary to his left fringe opinions. He's just a cheering section for the left fringe.

Olby stammers like Michael J. Fox
Deer-in-headlights when outside his box
With Keith's lack of brains
Stupidity reigns
He should go back to just sniffing jocks

IN CASE YOU MISSED IT LOONS, BADGER ESPECIALLY!

According to the Office of Management and Budget, the federal government will spend $79 billion on transportation in FY 2008. This is up from $54 billion in FY 2001, a 46 percent increase.

Seems like ignorance is bliss in your world!

Hey Brandon:
check out nutty "dorrie" making the rounds....

http://suburbarazzi.lohudblogs.com/2007/07/23/can-keith-olbermann-be-fair-and-balanced/

I think she is also "Kathy" and has been banned from the KO.org forum. Even though she is nuts, her Kathy Bates-like obsessive comments about Olbermann are entertaining (in a creepy sort of way). I did enjoy your occassional "documenting the Olbyloons" posts. But I think she's too creepy for even for the loons.

is it just me, or do Olberbutt symapthize more with Al Qaeda than he does with the US troops.

Brandon, Cox or Johnny:
Can you guys put together a little "highlight" video clip of Olbermann's preformance last night? The fans sites are going ga ga over him, ICN has a few comments that are positive, OW comments say it was pure torture. I didn't catch any of it, I was back & forth between CNN & Fox.

If he gets some awards for this coverage or any type of MSM praise, it will only further distinguish him as a "journalist/anchorman" with an "occassional" opinion/bias. Which is gonna drive a lot of folks nuts.

The Lefties are blamimg Bush and the Govenor.
Off couse the Mayor is getting a pass.
Watch it, tonight Olbermann will blame Bush!

"Watch it, tonight Olbermann will blame Bush!"...

BULLS**T!!!

MIKEY! Be here tomorrow to eat thy words!
Fat ass is very predictable.

He'll say ..."Tax cuts deplete road repair budget"...

Even though Minnesota has spent more and more each year

If it weren't for Mister Bush's illegal war, the money and equipment would be there to make sure that his halliburton built bridges don't collapse and murder innocent democrat Minnesotans. Let's also not forget that if Global Warming hadn't started on Jan 20, 2001, that bridge wouldn't have been put under the intense heat pressure that has obviously melted the steel. Fire can't melt steel, but Global Warming most certainly can. This is a true tipping point for the administration. Isn't it Johnathan Alter?

Next up we'll have John Dean discuss the blantant similarities between the collapse of the 35W bridge, the connection to Mister Bush, and the Nixon administration. And later on the show, Craig Crawford will be under the desk servicing me.

Minnesotans had a choice to build a brand new stadium for a billionaire resident or improving the city's infastructure... guess which one they chose?

The groundbreaking ceremony for the new stadium was scheduled for today... karma bites.

And Keith, don't forget that Bush may be wagging the dog here. The Rove scandal is blossoming and who would benefit the most if this collapsed bridge was all over the news? Mr Bush of course.

No BS Mike, four eyes will indeed try and blame Bush for this somehow, in his sick twisted little mind. DOnt you remember when he tried blaming Bush for the VA Tech shootings? This psycho will blame Bush for everything, including why he needs the little blue pill to get it up.

Michael at KO.org forum says about OW:

Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 11:41 am OW is a blog loosely allied with the "Freepers" (Free Republic) -- radical right wing hate spewing neocon Chicken Hawks -- run by a guy named Robert Cox. It calls itself "Obermann Watch" and there is no earthly reason to ever go there. It is a hate site used to "swiftboat" Olbermann, who they targetted early as the only threat to their MSM media hegemony.

----------------I kid you not, the very next response from justme2:

Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 12:08 pm

Sounds like I missed quite a yeoman's performance by KO -- I'm here in Chicago, and the disaster was quite a bit in the news.

We hear so much about our crumbling infrastructures thanks to the Republicans' policy of taxes bad, regardless of the higher costs down the road; one wonders if we're going to see a lot more of these as time goes on...

http://keitholbermann.org/ko_forum/viewtopic.php?t=9842&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=15

----------------What were you guys saying about the lefty's not blaming bush for the bridge collapse......

Sure sure Tim, and when he DOESN'T, you people will just say something stupid like "he usually does", and then remember this whole episode as if he had actually blamed Bush.

By the way, I wear glasses too. Calling someone "four eyes" and judging them on whether they need a "little blue pill or not to get it up" shows your own level of maturity.....Are you in the third grade?

By the way, he did NOT blame Bush for the Va. Tech shootings. I watched every minute of every show during that period and that is a LIE!

--------------What were you guys saying about the lefty's not blaming bush for the bridge collapse......"

I say you people have a fascinating way of distorting reality!

Over at Think Progress(Marxist) they were blaming Bush.
Some said Halliburton destroyed the bridge to coverup the Pat Tillman Murder!

"Some said Haliburton destroyed the bridge to coverup the Pat Tillman murder!"

So what! Every blog has nutball fringe posters who do not represent the norm.

As a perfect example.....this blog has you!

Mike,
I've never attacked you.
Explain the hostility.

Joker, it's not 'hostility'....it's frustration with unfair tactics and ridiculous arguments.

When you Point to over the top posts that appear on other blogs, it is NOT a fair indictment of an idealogy, or even of that particular blog.

As for the "Bush gets blamed for everything" argument, I have a fair amount of anger over this red herring coming from the right wing fringe claiming that "the left blames Bush for everything". This is nothing but an intentional distraction....and it simply is NOT true.

In your case, I'm still a little bothered that you attempted to slander the owner of a left leaning blog by publicly accusing them of child molestation the other day. You even tried to throw Olbermann and Mathews into the mix by claiming they helped cover it up. That was shameful as another blogger already pointed out to you.

These are not honest arguments or debate, and that is what is bothersome.

Mike,

When Olbermann is willing to consistently o tell lies that are so far removed from reality such as this:

" but fortunately I'm a journalist who does periodic commentary, and not a snake oil salesman pretending to be an analyst or newsman."

it's pretty hard to attack those who have little doubt that he will tell more lies of the same magnitude.

For love of all things shut the computer off and go live a life already, for christ sake I beg of you come out of your hole and go for a walk, no one here cares? Why the fuck do you post on a site for those of us who hate keith Olbermann,,,,there is the daily kos or Huffington, go live there, I could give a fuck about your wackaloon versions of what you pereceive the truth of anything to be

We hate Keith Olbermann,
We'll always hate Keith Olbermann
And you'll always be that little man living in his basement who trolls internet boards thinking he
is the smartest guy in the room

Leave already for christ sake, come out of your hole and go for a walk

6:48 name changing coward: How many times do I have to tell you to go f**k yourself!

You don't like what I write. Don't read it. You don't like Keith Olbermann...change the channel.

You spout: "I could give a fuck about your wackaloon versions of what you perceive the truth to be": And I couldn't give a "fuck" about what you perceive about me or my posts".

SIMPLETON!

While I'm a little amused by the OW regulars infatuation with Keith's ass size, let it be known that Robert Cox's ass HAS to be at least twice as large as Keiths:

http://watchingolbermannwatch.blogspot.com

How many names does OB use to post on this board?

----------------What were you guys saying about the lefty's not blaming bush for the bridge collapse......

Posted by: Great Thanks at August 2, 2007 5:23 PM

Not blaming "Bush" per se, but all of the"conservative" free-market fundamentalism that since "Mourning in America" has degraded our infrastructure, and all of the necessary and desireable functions that are the natural role of government in a wealthy, free nation.

SIMPLETON!

Posted by: Mike at August 2, 2007 6:58 PM

BULLS**T!!!

Posted by: Mike at August 2, 2007 4:37 PM

These are not honest arguments or debate, and that is what is bothersome.

Posted by: Mike at August 2, 2007 5:54 PM

"ROFLMAO!!" To quote a couple of whack job olbyloons.

"To quote a couple of whack job olbyloons."

Got a problem with your counting skills to go along with your many other handicaps Jeff?

LOL again!

Actually, Keith did blame Bush for the VT shooting. Check the tape.

I saw the actual coverage and any assertion that KO blamed Bush would have to be one HELL of a stretch!

I also see that he's not blaming Bush tonight as the naysayers predicted earlier.... but that won't stop them from accusing him of having done it after the fact....or making more such ridiculous predictions in the future.

By the way, he did NOT blame Bush for the Va. Tech shootings. I watched every minute of every show during that period and that is a LIE!

Posted by: Mike at August 2, 2007 5:25 PM

First sentence, lie. Second sentence, truth. I have no doubt.

"First sentence, lie. Second sentence, truth. I have no doubt."

I know you have no doubt, because you don't give a happy damn about the truth...you just care about trashing Olbermann...and me.

Great Thanks Great Thanks--I knew I was leaving out one of Kathy's aliases. She's the Queen of the Olby fans. I think Kathy was a homage to Kathy Bates whom she frequently seems to channel (as featured in the film "Misery").

Time allowing I hope to do a little something with the Loons reaction to the bridge collapse and who they pinned the blame on--ding ding ding--it's Bush and the GOP!

"Oh, and Bush allowed a gun ban to expire, which all but handed the weapon to the killer." KO.

The problem is Jeff, you have already proven your dishonesty with your use of quotations, as well as not using them when you should....so nothing you post can be trusted.

The problem is Jeff, you have already proven your dishonesty with your use of quotations, as well as not using them when you should....so nothing you post can be trusted.

Posted by: Mike at August 2, 2007 9:27 PM

Any proof to your spew? That's what I thought, nothing. You can deny the orange faced prick blamed Bush for the vt killings all you want. You have eatin' almost everything you have posted here. If you were defending Olbermahn in the court of law, he would have been juiced or gassed a long time ago!

LOL!....In a "court of Law" Jeff, I'd have put YOU away a long time ago for perjury, slander, and plagarism a long time ago.

Another quality debate from "mike." He runs full speed from the topic which he started, the vt killings and diverts as fast as he can. Run,"mike," run!

I stand by my VT comments Jeff. I saw the shows...and while KO did mention the FACT that a related law had just been allowed to expire by the "Republican Congress", he did NOT blame bush for "all but putting the gun in the killer's hand.

Do you call pointing out that your use of quotations can't be trusted "running from a debate"?

You are S-T-R-A-N-G-E!....No wonder you don't have a woman!.....LOL!

Finally, I didn't 'start' this debate!

LOL!....In a "court of Law" Jeff, I'd have put YOU away a long time ago for perjury, slander, and plagarism a long time ago.

Posted by: Mike at August 2, 2007 10:55 PM

Evidence? That's what I though, none, again. Maybe in the court of Nifong. Did you and he attend the same school? The school of liars and bs?

"Maybe in the court of Nifong. Did you and he attend the same school?"

Yea...we sometimes get together over a few drinks to discuss old times! :)

You are S-T-R-A-N-G-E!....No wonder you don't have a woman!.....LOL!

Finally, I didn't 'start' this debate!

Posted by: Mike at August 2, 2007 11:10 PM

For once you are right, I don't have a woman, I have women! Being debunked by someone you claim is "strange" can't be good.......see above. Debunked, then the blinders go on!

You're boring me again Jeff. Go 'debunk' some of your cows.

This blog is always a total waste... Mr Cox,, have you changed your personal Email address yet ?

For anyone that wants to answer...

If we get the terrorists out, and we finally leave, what happens if during a iraqi national election a hamas type political party takes over, then what do we do?

We are giving nuclear information and resources to Saudi Arabia. What happens if ten years down the road they are no longer our ally?

For those who say invading pakistan would be a bad idea (and it is) because of pakistan having nuclear weapons and being an ally, didn't bush invade iraq with our country believing iraq had nuclear weapons? So what is the difference?

We are told we were fighting al qaeda only in iraq. Were they there in 2002 before we invaded?

If the iraqi government does not make progress in the next year, what should we do? Do we keep fighting until the government can function?

Do you think the Powell doctrine of sending in more then enough troops to "guarantee" victory would have been better in hindsight then the more mobile and less structured Bush doctrine?

I think these are questions worth answering, but I'm sure I'll just get bitched at for not capitalizing iraq...

Those are all good questions..

1) We have to accept that democracy took its course and not try to play the worlds police...We've seen what that does...twice now.

2) We're fucked

3) There is none. We should not invade any country, we should not be on the end of starting wars. We should be on the end of ending conflicts.

4) No, they were not. They didnt get there until 2004...a year after we invaded. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Qaeda_in_Iraq

5) The Iraqi government has already said they can function well enough to let the U.S. leave. The Iraqi parliment has asked us to leave. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/10/AR2007051000387_pf.html

6) Yes. I think the Powel Doctrine might have prevented alot of the mess we are seeing today. Yet another reason not to trust Bush. I would like to point out though, I still feel it would have been more prudent of us to have not attacked at all and pursued those that really attacked America instead of making up bogus Nuclear Weapons threats.

"...slander...Evidence? That's what I though, none, again"

"the left wing hate sites like huffpo, du and media matters"
Posted by: royalking at July 23, 2007 1:15 AM

Slander and Perjury. It's a lie. You were proven wrong on this dumbass quote. And you've been proven wrong again.

Slander and Perjury. It's a lie. You were proven wrong on this dumbass quote. And you've been proven wrong again.

Posted by: StealThisOpinion at August 3, 2007 2:20 PM

Proof? When did this happen?

This is the wall that the debate is on...
http://www.olbermannwatch.com/archives/2007/07/countdown_with_313.php

and this is the post that lays out the debate as it happened.

Posted by: StealThisOpinion at July 25, 2007 4:22 AM

The only thing I saw was me exposing your hypocrisy in the bj matter, kos kiddie. Don't have time to chase your links to nowhere.

Wow. You are infuriatingly stupid. Let me post the conversation in a way thats easy for you to read. Ill even post my 'hypocrisy in the bj matter'...

countdown_with_312.php

-------------------------------------------------

"the left wing hate sites like huffpo, du and media matters"
Posted by: royalking at July 23, 2007 1:15 AM

-------------------------------------------------

""I guess the libby's haven't heard of this because it isn't plastered all over the left wing hate sites like huffpo, du and media matters. They would rather consintrate..."
-RK

1) Watch BillO much? What exactly qualifies the HuffPo and Media Matters to be "hate sites" aside from that they prove everything to know and believe wrong?

2) its spelled CONCENTRATE. Pass 4th grade spelling?"
Posted by: StealThisOpinion at July 23, 2007 5:19 AM

-------------------------------------------------

Before you actually responded you posted over 20 more times, and tried to hide behind a post of Cecelia's that touched our debate at a tangent and didnt really respond to anything...now onto the next board.

I saw that you had posted so I posted this..

-------------------------------------------------

RK, i have comments I would like you to respond to LINK(i had to delete a few links to get this to post, its a link to the previous board if you didnt know) there. Please respond, then Ill respond. thank you

Posted by: StealThisOpinion at July 24, 2007 12:12 PM

-------------------------------------------------

you posted 3 more times then I posted this...

RK, i have comments I would like you to respond to LINK(same place) there. Please respond, then Ill respond. thank you

Posted by: StealThisOpinion at July 24, 2007 12:12 PM

-------------------------------------------------

Ok, Ill get right on it. Right after "mike" tells us how he supports our troops as he has claimed countless times, yet, hasn't told us how. Except for banging "needless deaths" over and over on his keyboard.....

Posted by: royalking at July 24, 2007 2:24 PM

you then responded with

-------------------------------------------------

http://talkwisdom.blogspot.com/2007/07/daily-kos-outed-as-hate-website.html

Posted by: royalking at July 24, 2007 3:17 PM

http://pajamasmedia.com/2007/02/huffpo_erases_all_comments_at.php

Posted by: royalking at July 24, 2007 3:24 PM

-------------------------------------------------

I posted a few times calling you out on the debate because I had not seen the websites you posted...Im sorry about that, btw. Then I posted

-------------------------------------------------

Hey, Buddy. Already debunked the dailykos hate site thing. So Drop It.

And RoyalKing, the fact that they delete hateful comments off their site goes a very long way to prove they are, in fact, NOT a hate site.

Do you think before you post?

Posted by: StealThisOpinion at July 24, 2007 9:08 PM

-------------------------------------------------

stooge, you didn't debunk anything, ok? Lets get that straight. One more indoctrinator bites the dust, read it and weep.

Posted by: royalking at July 24, 2007 9:18 PM

-------------------------------------------------

RoyalKing, You're so dumb. Lets lay this out.

- You claim that HuffPo and MediaMatters are hate sites.
-- I challenge you to prove that they are hate sites on more than just the word of some Senile Fox News Anchor.
- You respond with a blog that just links to the O'Reilly claims that have been debunked*
--I call you out on it
- You respond with a link that says that the HuffPo ERASES hateful comments as proof that the Huffington Post is a hate site.
-- I laugh at you
- You ignore the HuffPo issue completely then claim: "stooge, you didn't debunk anything, ok? Lets get that straight. One more indoctrinator bites the dust, read it and weep."

Just because you say you win doesnt mean that you do. Lets get that straight. Go read a book.

* The comments that O'Reilly mentions in his slanderous hackjob against DailyKos are not representative of the majority of the DailyKos users. The comments in question were troll-rated, meaning that the majority of the DailyKos community does not agree with the remarks, thus these few rogue comments can not be chosen as a representative sample of the views of the DailyKos community.

If you dont know what troll-rated means, just ask.

Posted by: StealThisOpinion at July 25, 2007 4:22 AM

-------------------------------------------------

stooge, just because you post the words of some senile dailykos contributor doesn't prove anything.

Posted by: royalking at July 25, 2007 11:25 AM

-------------------------------------------------

Wow. Is that really all you've got to say? You're going to say I took the word of one senile contributor?? You really do like making slanderous, baseless claims. I'm taking the words of hundreds of thousands of fellow Kossaks and making use of their troll-rating system to denote what the general public agrees with.

Believe it or not, the DailyKos community is the foremost expert on what the DailyKos community thinks, feels, and believes. Not some right-wing pundit who is trying to put a slanderous name to a website he does not agree with. O'Reilly's only claim against DailyKos now is "Why do they let people post this stuff?" Its simple, free speech.

So, I'm right then? Was that you making your best attempt at a comeback? If thats the case then I'm right, You're wrong, thank you for playing.

Posted by: StealThisOpinion at July 25, 2007 12:00 PM

-------------------------------------------------

And you didnt respond. You took the conversation on a whole other road in which you also lost the debate.

RoyalKing.
...
On the blog thing. I thought I asked you to recant your statement about those blogs being hate sites, ya know, since you dont have ANY evidence to back it up. On second thought, I would like an apology issued to the members of the DailyKos, HuffPo, and MediaMatters communities...if thats not too much to ask?
Posted by: StealThisOpinion at July 25, 2007 11:28 PM

-------------------------------------------------

Now, for the "hypocrisy" about the bj thing

who stepped down for marital infidelities, was right to step down because those who hold values to cheat on their wives do not deserve a spot in congress. Oh hypocrisy.

Posted by: StealThisOpinion at July 24, 2007 11:55 AM

-------------------------------------------------

Were you calling for BJ Clinton to step down for cheating on his wife, or was that "different?"

Posted by: royalking at July 24, 2007 2:33 PM

Posted by: royalking at July 24, 2007 9:39 PM

-------------------------------------------------

And I wasnt calling for BJ Clinton to step down. I think that was nothing but politics by the Right-Wing and I think its incredibly hypocritical for anyone who cheered for clinton's impeachment to say that impeaching Dubya is pointless and a waste of time. Where did you get that I supported the Clinton impeachment? I support bad people getting what they deserve, not a good president getting tarnished for getting a BJ.

Do you think Vitter should step down for paying a hooker so he could put on a diaper and shit in his pants? Or is that less of a removable offense than getting a BJ?

Olbyloon hypocrisy, exposed.

Posted by: royalking at July 25, 2007 12:56 PM

-------------------------------------------------

RoyalKing.

You're missing a small little point about the Vitter thing. The man got office running on a restoring family values platform. Its not only that he cheated on his wife with a woman that he paid to put him in a diaper so he could shit himself, its that he completely went against a major campaign issue that got him elected. Olby-Hypocrisy...negated.
Posted by: StealThisOpinion at July 25, 2007 11:28 PM

-------------------------------------------------

and you never responded

Now, ""...slander...Evidence? That's what I though, none, again""

Theres evidence of slander of the DailyKos and of me. Perjury in the sense that you lied about the dailykos and tried to misrepresent a post talking about how the HuffPo deletes hateful comments as proof of it being a hate site.

Kos kiddie? Is that supposed to be an insult? compliment? Are you stupid?

The first half of our conversation is here http://www.olbermannwatch.com/archives/2007/07/

and the second half here http://www.olbermannwatch.com/archives/2007/07/countdown_with_313.php

God, I cant wait to see what you come up with to say to that.

"Don't have time to chase your links to nowhere."

Of course Royal Douche 'doesn't have time to chase links' that prove him wrong...

After all, there's Bulls that need milked.

How can you have time to perpetually post right-wing tripe, but have no time to read anything?

Because we're too busy having to wade through the left-wing bullshit you Olbyloons post?

anyone who watches cable news and believes any of it is not very bright. oreilly and olberman are both biased hacks. it is sad that this country is turning into a bunch of he said she said faux news junkies.

From IMDB:

"Bridge Collapse Draws Millions to MSNBC Website
MSNBC.com said Monday that its coverage of the bridge collapse in Minneapolis drew a near-record number of visitors to its website last week. The NBC Universal-owned cable news network, whose website routinely attracts more viewers than those connected with the other cable news networks, said that it had recorded more than 82 million page views for its coverage, which included 11 million for its video streams, many of which were provided by "citizen journalists," ordinary individuals at the scene who recorded the aftermath of the collapse on their video cell phones and camcorders. Meanwhile, the audience share for MSNBC's cable network rose 7 percent in July, while Fox's share dropped 6 percent and CNN's 4 percent."

W-E-B-S-I-T-E dumbass, not the network. People tuned out as soon as they saw Keith's bumbling performance on air.

1. I don't know why the invective in my direction. I simply posted a fact; it wasn't in rebuttal to any other post.

2. "People tuned out..." Your omniscence s impressive.

3. There have been lots of comments about the ratings of MSNBC here over the last few days (including one unattributed set that is wildly at odds with figures quoted in major papers recently), but the last sentence of the quote says that MSNBC has risen in July, while the other two major cable news networks' ratings fell. Just trying to introduce a little fact-checking and outside independent reality. Sorry. Not sure why I bothered.