Olberloon- DEAD LAST (again)

CABLE NEWS RACE
WEDS., AUG 1, 2007
VIEWERS

FOXNEWS 8 PM BRIDGE 3,743,000
FNC HANNITY/COLMES 3,382,000
CNN KING 3,099,000
FNC GRETA 2,740,000
CNN COOPER 2,604,000
CNN 11 PM BRIDGE 1,883,000
FNC 11 PM BRIDGE 1,799,000
CNN 8 PM BRIDGE 1,635,000
FNC SHEP SMITH 1,502,000
MSNBC 9 PM BRIDGE 1,003,000
CNN DOBBS 970,000
MSNBC 10 PM BRIDGE 954,000
MSNBC OLBERMANN 939,000

There's a shocker. Olby places dead last for live news coverage. He knows absolutely nothing about news, let alone live news.

Last place ratings must really hurt
Face down with his dick in the dirt
He's circling the drain
With nary a brain
Compared to Bill, Keith's just a squirt

What a real live news story happens and no one wants to hear from the new "Edward R. Murrow"?

Maybe if Olby's numbers were higher, we wouldn't be in such a fucking mess, maybe a few thousand more patriots alive and even thousands more saved from permanent disabilities from the war; the Constitution respected, maybe even Bin Ladin captured and brought to justice, etc.

The again, "we don't pay much attention to poll numbers," right?

I think history will be much kinder to Olby's legacy than W's. Hell, it's kinder than Nixon's and Carter's already.

Rinse, and repeat.

Olbermann's should be renamed:

Liberaldom's Lewinsky Dress

or

Air America TV

or

When Strawmen are Attacked!

or

Liberal Masturbation with KO

Just when I thought KO might have a soul for defending "Bill-O" for this-- http://mike-stark.dailykos.com/ --he goes and calls him a bigot. You know, for daring to oppose massive illegal unassimilated immigration! How DARE he!!

Ah the left wing communist propaganda sites that us give our liberal friends on this site are in full attack mode over the bridge collapse.
Let me educate the liberals right away.
During the Clinton administration, never more than 22 billion spent on infrastructure. Bush spent 54 billion in 2001 and is now spending 79 billion in 2008 which is a 46% increase. Basically he has spent 3 times as much a BJ Clinton.

Unlike the left blaming Bush, I would not be dumb enough to blame BJ Clinton for the bridge because I realize that if any president a spent 100 billion trillion dollars on Infrastructure it would not matter because the money would not have gone to build a new bridge anyway since no one thought it was going to fall down anytime soon.

The argument Bush hasn't spent enough has nothing to do with the problems with the Infrastructure or with the amount of money spent,it has to do with how the money earmarked for certain projects be they roads,bridges or levees is diverted by Senators,Congressmen,State and Local officials for pet projects and this is a problem that crosses party lines and has been going on a lot longer than Bush and it won't end after Bush.

Factor, you commie hatin patriot you, you people keep droning on about the "left blaming Bush" for this bridge accident, and I don't have a clue where you are getting all this crap from?

I've heard nothing but honest discussions about the current state of America's infrastruture, and NO Bush bashing.

As for wearever it is you are finding your leftie bashing bulls**t, all I can say is that if you keep digging in the sewer, don't be surprised when you find some crap!

As for your inane penchant for calling people'Communists' Factor, you wouldn't know a Communist if one bit you in the ass.

These July cable rankings of the Top 20 shows among adults 25-54 pretty much speak for themselves:

Net____ Program________________________ Viewers
FOX___ THE OREILLY FACTOR______________375
FOX___ HANNITY & COLMES________________362
FOX___ ON THE RECORD W/GRETA__________351
FOX___ FOX AND FRIENDS__________________318
FOX___ THE OREILLY FACTOR (RPT)__________303
FOX___ THE FOX REPORT W/S.SMITH_________292
FOX___ AMERICAS NEWSROOM______________279
FOX___ SPECIAL REPORTW/BRIT HUME_______263
CNN___ LARRY KING LIVE___________________ 252
FOX___ LIVE DESK W/M.MACCALLUM_________235
FOX___ FOX NEWS LIVE_____________________ 224
FOX___ FOX & FRIENDS FIRST_______________ _223
MSNBC_ MSNBC INVESTIGATES (RPT)_________215
FOX___ STUDIO B W/S.SMITH________________ 209
MSNBC_ MSNBC REPORTS (RPT)______________207
CNN___ ANDERSON COOPER 360______________205
FOX___ THE BIG STORY W/J GIBSON__________ 204
CNN___ LOU DOBBS TONIGHT_________________203
FOX___ YOUR WORLD W/NEIL CAVUTO_________198
MSNBC_ COUNTDOWN W/ K. OLBERMANN______185
(Via TV Newser)

haha... The DeFactor mistaking record levels of PORK as infrastructure spending.

The bridge that collapsed in MN wasn't a new bridge in Alaska.

Now, how much of that money was earmarked for repairs to standing structure?

People on the Left, like Ken Starr's law firm?

Wow. If he's Left by your standards, what does that make you?....

Gosh Pete, why did you leave out Hardball, Tucker, & Dan Abrams show in your ratings 'report'? In other words, you omitted virtually every other MSNBC news related show. Is it because you wanted to be sure Olbermann was at the bottom of your list?....and I guess you really didn't feel like reporting the FACT that KO leads his own network...by a lot!

Leading MSNBC by a lot still says very little.

"leading MSNBC by a lot still says very little."

Actually John-O, I disagree....ON the contrary, it saya a lot. MSNBC's familiarity to the public as a News Network is not nearly as well known as either Fox or CNN...and I have even read that it is not available in as many areas as the other two cable networks.

Given the choice between leading (by a lot) in a lower rated Network, or trailing at a higher rated network, I believe I would choose the former.

Mike,
The Left has been attacking Bush over the bridge.
I saw Mike Jack Cafferty Blame Bush.
Mike Barnicle bakmed Bush.

Edward R. Older-man was in last place with the hard news coverage on the bridge collapse.

Poor dufas. All dressed up and no one to watch him.

Actually, I'm grateful for the high numbers for F-News watchers and applaud their dedicated sacrifice.

They selflessly volunteer to watch it, so those of us actively trying to create positive change don't have to.

God bless their precious souls.

Joker, I have been reading your definitions for such things as "blaming Bush", or "supporting jihadists" for a long, long time....and all I can say is you have an interesting way of interpreting these things that I certainly don't share with you. Usually I just shake my head and don't respond.

That said, I watched Mike Barnicle tonight, and while he discussed America's infrastructure problem from all angles, and discussed the implications of how lower taxes might contribute to the overall problem, he did NOT blame Bush for the bridge collapse!

Mike, I know this is a difficult concept for you to grasp but the reason that Olby is at the bottom of that list is because he's at the bottom of the list. It was a list of the top 20 shows. 20. Count them. And the reason Olby is at the bottom? His ratings still suck despite all the glowing PR releases and spinning by Olby and his friends in the MSM to the contrary. Is that so difficult a concept to grasp for you?

"while he discussed America's infrastructure problem from all angles, and discussed the implications of how lower taxes might contribute to the overall problem, he did NOT blame Bush for the bridge collapse! "

Yes he did!
By blaming lower taxes, he blamed Bush.
How about blaming the inspectors that observed the problems and didn't ask fo action?

Brandon, did you even read any of my posts? Did you choose to ignor every point for any particular reason?

Oh yes, I forget...you are hopelessly biased and personally vested in trying to make this man look just as bad as you possibly can.

John-O said nothing about the "top 20" in his post. An honest list would include ALL related shows and ALL pertinent information.

Arn't ommisions like that the VERY thing you keep railing about in your criticisms of KO?

I may be wrong, but wasn't American Idol's viewer numbers significantly larger than any of the presidential debates?

Guess that means ALL the candidates must suck!

I love it when neocons, or pass-the-dutchie lefties for that matter, apply thenarrowest portions of socialism to media debates!

Mike Barnacle actually had a show for a short time on MSNBC. It may have been in Olby's time slot or Scarboro's. He seems a little better now; he was incredibly boring before. That may have been before the war and most of the shows had the depth of discussing every angle of the Chandra Levy case. Barnacle was a frequent guest on Imus.

BTW, I caught just a minuteof BOR's talking points yesterday, and he made it clear that his show is an opinion show. I'll have to see if a can find a transcript.

Mike spewed: "MSNBC's familiarity to the public as a News Network is not nearly as well known..."

MSNBC is a News Network?

No Joker, he didn't!

Your mind works funny!...And that's exactly why it's best if we don't try to debate at all.

There is NOTHING wrong with discussing the possibility that lower taxes MAY have contributed to the OVERALL infrastructure problem. It is simply part of an honest debate about the subject and he certainly did NOT blame Bush for the bridge collapse!

Yep, bush ain' to blame for anything.

Just ask those folks on the Gulf Coast, even the ones who voted for Lott in Mississippi.

"MSNBC is a News Network?"

Haha! so true, except for a couple hours per 24 cycle.

Yet another outstanding review by E. Shit's. What the excuse this time. Your fucking cat eat the remote control? Do us all a big favor. Put a lock of your hair in a bag, get a bottle of rice whine and a steak knife and go out in the back yard and do the honorable thing. You are embarrassing your family.

Mike,
Why did Mike Barnicle and other leftist politicize this tragedy?
Whay do Taxes have to do with it.
Under Bush the spending for Highways has increased!
The problem is The inspectors who knew there were problems and didn't report the severity of it.
The Left disgusts me!

Anon,
" or pass-the-dutchie lefties for that matter,"
What about Pass the dutchi Righties?

Oh brother Joker! We probably shouldn't even try to communicate with each other.

HE DIDN'T BALME BUSH!!!!!

And by the way, if you haven't figured it out yet, the extreme right discusts ME these days.

"Anon,
" or pass-the-dutchie lefties for that matter,"
What about Pass the dutchi Righties?"

Posted by: The Joker at August 2, 2007 11:37 PM

I know a few Righties who would benefit from by a good peace-pipe session; but alas, I can't quite shoehorn "pass the dutchie on the right hand side" in without confusing the Musical Youth fans.

Once again Krazy Keith is wrong
Wall Street Journal and Mike Nifong
Keith's always lying
For last place he's vying
Each night it's the same moonbat song

Keith was wrong about making Mike Stark the number two person in WPITW.. Mike Stark should have hurt O'Reilly in anyway he could have. To be that close to O'Reilly I would have least threw a pie at him and then spit on the piece of human filth... But it is nice to know that America now has access to Bill O'Rielly's home address.

And by the way, if you haven't figured it out yet, the extreme right discusts ME these days.
Posted by: Mike at August 2, 2007 11:41 PM

Dukakis, that you?

p.s. wtf is it to "balme" someone? You kids and your hip lingo! Nope, I''ve never typed a typo I didn't love. ;)

"Anon,
" or pass-the-dutchie lefties for that matter,"
What about Pass the dutchi Righties?"

Posted by: The Joker at August 2, 2007 11:37 PM

Nope, they're dopiness and paranoia is a natural high, unfortunately.

>BTW, I caught just a minuteof BOR's talking points yesterday, and he made it clear that his show is an opinion show. I'll have to see if a can find a transcript.

Posted by: Sharon at August 2, 2007 11:27 PM

Then why does he repeatedly say:

"We use facts, only facts" ?

At least one of the weapons used by the shooter is believed, as we said, to be in nine millimeter semi-automatic pistol, which would be like this one, with a clip designed to hold more than 10 shots. Clips like those were banned under the Assault Weapons Law of 1994, but Congress and President Bush allowed that law to expire more than two years ago.

Keith Olbermann Transcript

That turned out to be inaccurate anyways, but the implication is clear to me.

other:

Are YOU Dukakis?

Cheeky monkey!

"they're," I said it.

Despite O'Reilly's Claims The Factor Ratings Are Not Increasing

1-1-06 -- O'Reilly is always talking about how his ratings are going through the roof and thanking his viewers for increasing his ratings. But it'a all a lie, his ratings have not gone up at all in the last year. He claims his show gets 6 million viewers a night, which is an outright LIE. At no time in the history of the show has he averaged 6 million viewers a night, ever.

In October of 2004 the O'Reilly Factor was averaging 3.1 million viewers a month and a 2.8 rating, that was his highest rated month since 0ctober of 2004. In October of 2005 the Factor averaged 2.6 million viewers a month and a 2.3 rating. But in November of 2005 the O'Reilly Factor only averaged 2.5 million viewers a month and a 2.2 rating. So his ratings have actually went down over the last year.

His yearly rating is down to a 2.2, with an average total viewer number of 2,490,000 a night. But if you watch the factor you would think O'Reilly's ratings have gone up, when in fact, they have went down.

This is the yearly average for the O'Reilly Factor from 12-27-04 to 12-25-05.

Rating - 2.2 -- Total Viewers - 2,490,000 -- 25 to 54 Demographic - 564,000

Yearly Cable News Shows Ratings: www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/original/2005ranker.pdf

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Former FOX Producer Speaks About War on Christmas

CHARLIE REINA, former Fox News Channel producer:

12-14-05 -- As with many conflicts, particularly the manufactured kind, dishonesty, greed and ignorance are the culprits behind Fox News Channel's so-called “War on Christmas.” But their enabler, as Dr. Phil might call it, is that well-intended but wholly misguided scourge of society -- political correctness. Rather than promoting tolerance, inclusion and understanding, as advertised, p/c has had the opposite effect. It has made us not a freer society, but one of timid, tongue-tied slaves to convention who substitute glib code words for the more difficult task of actually treating each other with respect. It’s the kind of shortcut that sooner or later circles back to bite you.

But first let’s look at what political correctness is, and is not, in this context. Wishing your customers or co-workers, “Happy holidays,” isn’t p/c; it’s common sense. Try saying, “Merry Christmas, happy Hannukah, a joyous Kwanzaa and a prosperous New Year” every time you leave the office, and before long they won’t let you back in. But taking something that’s recognized everywhere – by people of all religious beliefs -- as a Christmas tree and renaming it a “holiday tree” is political correctness, pure and simple.

It adds nothing, reaches out to no one. It’s as offensive as it would be to call a Menorah a “festive candelabra,” or Santa Claus “Jolly old Good-guy Nick.” Granted, as a cause for war, this holiday p/c is no Pearl Harbor. But in its own naïve way, it provides the warmongers with just the ammunition they want.

It’s no surprise, of course, that this phony call to arms, this “Christmas (ergo, Christians) Under Attack” hysteria, emanates from the bowels of Fox News Channel. The network is, after all, ground zero in the culture wars that polarize so much of America these days. Make no mistake about it: Fox is on a mission. Its slogans say, “Fair and Balanced” and “We Report, You Decide.”

Full Story Here: Former FOX Producer Speaks About War on Christmas

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Billy O'Reilly Caught Lying About no Country Claiming The Iraq war Was Illegal

Once again O'Reilly is caught lying to the American people. Here is what he said last night (12-12-05) in an interview with a Democratic State Senator from NY about the Iraq war being illegal.

O'REILLY: When you say that Bush went to war illegally into Iraq.
DUANE: Yes.
O'REILLY: You are wrong, because the United Nations mandate said that the first Gulf War, cease-fire must be upheld or the United States and all the other coalition partners could go back in. You certainly know that. You don't sign a cease-fire and allow the enemy to disobey it. Come on.
DUANE: And yet the vast majority of the coalition partners did not.
O'REILLY: Doesn't mean it was illegal.
DUANE: Well, they felt it was illegal under international law.
O'REILLY: They did not feel it was illegal. There isn't one country in this world.
O'REILLY: You shouldn't be saying things that aren't true. It was not an illegal invasion to remove Saddam.

Those are all lies from Billy O'Reilly, not one thing he said is true. Spanish, Canadian, Australian, and a lot of American legal experts say the Iraq war is illegal. Just do a google search on "Iraq War Illegal" and you will see that almost every international law expert agrees that the war in Iraq is illegal. You could disagree with the experts, but to state as fact that no country says the war is illegal and claim it's a fact is dishonest and a lie.

The US and British governments have claimed that their invasion is justified by UN Security Council Resolution 1441 (So Does Billy O'Reilly) and two old Security Council resolutions authorizing force to end the Iraqi occupation of Kuwait and setting out the terms of the cease-fire after the Persian Gulf War of 1991. The 1991 resolution required Iraq to rid itself of weapons of mass destruction.

John Currie, a University of Ottawa law school professor, described these arguments as fatally flawed. The 1991 resolution stated that the Security Council “decides to remain seized of the matter and to take such further steps as may be required for the implementation of the present resolution.” The Security Council—not the United States, Britain or other council members acting on their own—must decide on further use of force, Professor Currie said.

Phyllis Bennis from the Institute for Policy Studies said this:

Iraq signed the ceasefire resolution (687) with the United Nations, not with the U.S., and only the UN Security Council can determine whether it is complying and what to do if it is not. The U.S. Congress does not have the right to determine that any UN Security Council resolutions will be enforced by the use of force, regardless of any finding that violation of the resolution may effect the national security interests of the United States. Further, several of the UN resolutions referenced (including 688) were not taken under Chapter VII and have no legal basis for military enforcement.

Bush promised to have the 2nd UN resolution vote that would have authorized the use of force, he said there will be a vote and let the chips fall where they may, no such vote ever happened, and here is why. The Bush and Blair governments abandoned their efforts to secure a new UN resolution to authorize the use of force, after failing to win any more than four out of fifteen votes. They also faced vetoes by France and Russia and public opposition by Germany and several other members of the council.

Billy never mentions any of that, he cherry picked parts of the UN resolution that makes his argument sound correct. Yet he ignores the parts that prove he is a liar, and wrong about the claims that nobody says the war is illegal.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

O'Reilly Caught Red Handed Using Year Old Clip From 2004 Daily Show

12-10-05 -- You know this war on Christmas is bogus when O'Reilly has to use a year old clip from the Daily show to fraud his viewers. And Jon Stewart is Jewish, so he does not observe Christmas.

This whole war on Christmas is made up by O'Reilly, Hannity, Gibson, and the religious right. They are doing it to fool the American people into thinking the big bad secular progressive liberals are trying to do away with Christmas and Religion. It's ridiculous, liberals do not want to do away with Christmas or Religion. Nobody cares if you say Merry Christmas, Happy Holidays, or Seasons Greetings, except for O'Reilly, Hannity, Gibson, and the Religious right. And liberals do NOT want to do away with Religion, we just dont want it in the schools or government when taxpayer money is used.

Jon Stewart gave Bill O'Reilly a beatdown for his misleading use of a year old Daily Show clip from December of 2004 to show what O'Reilly claims is a current "war on Christmas."

During the 12-2-05 broadcast of O'Reilly's Fox News talk show The O'Reilly Factor and his Fox News radio show The Radio Factor, O'Reilly used a year-old video clip from The Daily Show to demonstrate what he claims is an ongoing "war on Christmas" by secular forces. However, O'Reilly falsely told his radio listeners the clip had aired the day before and left his cable viewers with a similar misleading impression.

Stewart stated satirically: "Apparently, we liberal secular fags here at Comedy Central have fired a devastating year old six second long joke that doesn't barely even make any sense to us anymore across the bow of Christianity."

Full Story: Jon Stewart Nails O'Reilly For Fraud

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Bill O'Reilly Denial That is a Lie, And His Own Words Prove it

The Radio Factor, 11-29-05:

O'REILLY: "There is a move under foot to discourage people from buying in stores that do not use 'Merry Christmas' in their advertising. I am not a part of that.

But look at what he said on the Neil Cavuto show:

O'REILLY: They don't have to say "Merry Christmas" in China, OK? They can say whatever they say in China, "Happy Winter." All right? "We like pandas." Say whatever you want. This is America. This is the big commercial holiday. You're not going to acknowledge the holiday? Then I'm not shopping there. And that's what the bottom line is here. The backlash is building, building, building, and these retailers are going to find out as Federated Department Stores Inc. found out last year -- that's Macy's, Bloomingdale's, Burdines. They didn't say it last year. This year Federated is saying it, so they took a hit.

Call me crazy but unless I can not read english O'Reilly said "You're not going to acknowledge the holiday? Then I'm not shopping there." Yet on his radio show he said he was not part of that movement, from what I see he lies so much he cant keep his lies straight.

If any of you brainwashed O'Reilly lovers can explain to me how O'Reilly can say that and claim he is not part of that movement, please e-mail me. How can you say if a store does not use the word "Merry Christmas" you will not shop there, then deny you are part of the move under foot to discourage people from buying in stores that do not use 'Merry Christmas' in their advertising ? O'Reilly also listed all the stores that are refusing to use Merry Christmas, if he is not part of that movement why did he publish the list ? I thought he had a no spin zone, if that is not spin I'm Elvis.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

O'Reilly Chickened Out of Debate With George Clooney

12-6-05 -- Just as I thought O'Reilly is the real coward. I was flipping through the channels the other night and I saw George Clooney on the Dan Abrams show. Dan asked Clooney about his feud with O'Reilly, at one point he mentioned having a debate with O'Reilly. Clooney said he agreed to debate O'Reilly on the Charlie Rose show on PBS, Rose had it all set up, they just needed O'Reilly to agree to a time and a date.

Big bad Billy O'Reilly said NO, his excuse was that Rupert Murdoch would not let him do it. What a load of bullshit, he had a debate with Paul Krugman on the Tim Russert show on CNBC, Murdoch did not seem to care about that. So the king of calling people cowards is afraid to debate George Clooney, and he is the one who said Clooney is afraid to debate him. He also said Clooney is afraid to go on the Factor, when Clooney has said he will debate O'Reilly anywhere but on his show.

On top of that Dan Abrams offered to host the debate on his show, he said he called O'Reilly and asked him if he would debate Clooney on his show and O'Reilly said no again.

So the big bad Billy O'Reilly is the real coward, he knows Clooney is smart and well informed, and he knows Clooney would wipe the floor with him in a debate. That is the real reason he will not debate George Clooney, it has nothing to do with Rupert Murdoch, O'Reilly is just a coward who is afraid to debate a well informed liberal.

Full Transcript: MSNBC Transcript of Dan Abrams & George Clooney

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Billy O'Reilly Makes Top 10 Conservative Idiot List at DemocraticUnderground.com (Again)

#10 Bill O'Reilly

And finally, exciting news for those of you who have been following the Bill O'Reilly saga - the Falafel Master's fabled enemies list (see Idiots 223) is finally online! Don't get too excited though - unless you're the New York Daily News, the St. Petersburg Times, or MSNBC, you're not on the list.

Yes, Bill's attempt at McCarthyism is a tad weak at the moment - he only has three names listed so far, and they're the aforementioned news organizations. Presumably they neglected to say anything complimentary about Bill's suggestion that Al Qaeda terrorists should blow up the Coit Tower in San Francisco.

Come on, Bill! Your list is lame! Where's OReillySucks.com? Where's SweetJesusIHateBillOReilly.com? Where's UrbanDictionary.com? Where, for that matter, is Democratic Underground? We've been ripping you a new one for years!

So be a pal - put down that telephone, switch off your vibrator, and get your list on. There are millions of people out there waiting to patronize the organizations you despise.

Top 10 Conservative Idiots List

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fox News Poll: Bill O'Reilly's Fake War on Christmas

12-3-05 -- O'Reilly had FOX do an opinion poll and ask if you believe there is a war on Christmas, but I dont think this is the answer he wanted. Even in a biased FOX poll he still lost. They even worded the poll to nudge them to the answer they wanted. It should have said Is there a war on Christmas do you agree or disagree, instead of There is a war on Christmas do you agree or disagree. They asked the question in a leading way by wording it the way they did, and they still lost.

It's just more proof this war on Christmas crap is a non-issue that nobody cares about. The whole thing was made up by O'Reilly, Hannity, Gibson, Falwell, Robertson, etc. They are doing it to make liberals look bad by claiming secular progressives (liberals) want to do away with Christmas and Religion, which is ridiculous. We dont want to do away with Christmas, and we dont care what you call it. And we dont want to do away with Religion, we just dont want it in schools or Government.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bill O'Reilly Voted World's Worst by Keith Olberman (Again)

12-1-05 -- The bronze goes to Bill O‘Reilly. He has solidified in his status as this generation Joe McCarthy. Just like the “Red Baiter,” he now has his own list. His Web site reads the following media operations have regularly helped distribute defamation and false information supplied by far left Web sites. The list, “The New York Daily News, “The St. Petersburg Times,” and MSNBC!

You call it defamation, Bill. We call it precise quotes from your show.

The runner up. Bill O‘Reilly. On “The Today Show,” no less. Now how did that happen? Says, quote, “these pinheads running around going, get out of Iraq now, don‘t know what they‘re talking about. These are the same people before Hitler invaded in World War II that were saying, he‘s not such a bad guy.” Watch. That will turn up tomorrow on his list of defamations.

But tonight‘s winner, Bill O‘Reilly! You know this whole attack on Christmas nonsense that he made up? Some sort of fantasy in which the liberals are coming to your town to force you and your family to not call it Christmas anymore? The fantasy that we can‘t say Merry Christmas, but you can only say Happy Holidays?

The thing designed to stir up religious hatred and paranoia in this country? Guess what they‘re selling over at the FOX News online store? The FOX News holidays ornament? And the O‘Reilly Factor Holiday ornament. Who is trying to change Merry Christmas into Happy Holidays?

Bill O‘Reilly, that‘s who.Today‘s worst person in the world!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Operation: Falafel

11-8-05: Bill O'Reilly: Hey, you know, if you want to ban military recruiting, fine, but I'm not going to give you another nickel of federal money. You know, if I'm the president of the United States, I walk right into Union Square, I set up my little presidential podium, and I say, "Listen, citizens of San Francisco, if you vote against military recruiting, you're not going to get another nickel in federal funds. Fine. You want to be your own country? Go right ahead."

And if Al Qaeda comes in here and blows you up, we're not going to do anything about it. We're going to say, look, every other place in America is off limits to you, except San Francisco. You want to blow up the Coit Tower? Go ahead.

Bill O'Reilly crossed the line by endorsing an al Qaeda terrorist attack against San Francisco. It is time to do what should have been done a long time ago - hit him in the wallet. We must notify O'Reilly's sponsors that they are, in fact, sponsoring a man that has stated his support of a terrorist attack against San Francisco.

Click Here to Join Operation Falafel.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Most Ridiculous O'Reilly Statement of The Day

10-26-05 -- O'REILLY: Those guys have poured tens of millions of dollars into political organizations designed to harm people with whom the left disagrees. For example, Soros and Lewis have each donated two and a half million dollars at least to MoveOn.org, which is a relentless liberal attack machine.

So "Billy" is crying about 2.5 million dollars donated to moveon.org by Soros and Lewis, and he claims that is going to ruin America and harm people the left disagrees with. That is garbage, they use that money to promote liberal ideas and an agenda to help the people. This was nothing but a biased one sided right wing propaganda segment with 3 Republicans and nobody from the left to provide the balance. Not to mention they never said a word about the hundreds of millions wealthy conservatives donate to far right foundations and groups. Not a word about the Heritage Foundation, AEI, ATR, the Sarah Scaife Foundation, nothing. The right has been doing this for 10 to 15 years, yet "Billy" has no problem with them.

Funny how "Billy" never mentions any of this:

In 1994, a core group of 12 conservative foundations controlled more than $1.1 billion in assets; from 1992-94, they awarded $300 million in grants, and targeted $210 million to support a wide array of projects and institutions. Over the last two decades, the 12 have mounted an impressively coherent and concerted effort to shape public policy by undermining and ultimately redirecting what they regard as the institutional strongholds of modern American liberalism: academia, Congress, the judiciary, executive branch agencies, major media, religious institutions, and philanthropy itself.

They channeled some $80 million to right-wing policy institutions actively promoting an anti-government, unregulated markets agenda. Another $89 million supported conservative scholars and academic programs, with $27 million targeted to recruit and train the next generation of right-wing leaders in conservative legal principles, free-market economics, political journalism and policy analysis. And $41.5 million was invested to build a conservative media apparatus, support pro-market legal organizations, fund state-level think tanks and advocacy organizations, and mobilize new philanthropic resources for conservative policy change. The strong role that conservative foundations have played in shaping national and state policy debates reflects not only impressive cash reserves, but also a sophisticated funding strategy:

Hey "Billy" why dont you read this then report on it:

Right Thinking, Big Grants, and Long Term Strategy

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Happy Anniversary, Bill O'Reilly!

On Day of Atonement, Fox star's sex harass lawsuit turns one

10-13-05 -- Seems fitting that today, Yom Kippur, the Jewish Day of Atonement, marks the first anniversary of the Bill O'Reilly phone sex/falafel/loofah lawsuit. O'Reilly, no member of the tribe, paid penance with his checkbook days after Andrea Mackris leveled her X-rated charges. So join us as we recall that noteworthy day in legal history with the below reprise of our original story.

Full Story: www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris1.html

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Republicans Violate House Rules by Holding 5 Minute Vote Open For 50 Minutes

Update 10-14-05: Not a word from O'Reilly on this story, so much for fair and balanced.

Will O'Reilly report this story, sure he will, when pigs fly. He is too busy attacking media matters for reporting the truth about him. O'Reilly dont care about important issues like this because it makes Republicans look bad. Reporting on a website (media matters) that tells the real no spin truth about him is more important than Republicans violating house rules to rig a vote for the oil industry.

CBS News correspondent Bob Fuss reports there was chaos on the Hour floor as Republican leaders passed the bill by holding a five-minute vote open for almost 50 minutes until they could convince two Republicans to change their votes.

When over two dozen Republicans initially voted no, DeLay, Barton, House Speaker Dennis Hastert and new Majority Leader Roy Blunt circled the chamber to cajole holdouts. "Once again, on an issue of critical importance to the American people, the Republican Majority has chosen to trample the democratic process and manipulate the outcome of a vote on the Floor of the House of Representatives, after the vote was completed."

"Is this the House of a Banana Republic?" Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., shouted at one point, expressing his frustration about the GOP holdup of the final tally.

Several Democrats protested that the vote was held open. "I am informed that every member of Congress who is in town has voted," Democratic whip Steny Hoyer of Maryland said at one point, when the tally was 210 yes, 214 no.

No Democrats voted for the legislation.

Read The Full Story Here

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FOX Caught Editing Factor Transcript (Again)

Once again we have clear proof the factor edits their transcripts, even though O'Reilly has said his show is never edited. Not only do they edit it, they have errors on the text of who said what. They have Clark saying something that O'Reilly said, and they remove text that makes O'Reilly look bad. The FOX transcript also left out a line from the General where he says he dont want US troops put in danger either.

----------------

FOX Transcript:

O'REILLY: General, you need to look at the Malmady (ph) massacre in World War II and the 82nd Airborne.

Newshounds Transcript:

O'REILLY: General, you need to look at the Malmedy Massacre in World War II and the 82nd Airborne who did it.

----------------

FOX Transcript:

O'REILLY: I agree with that, but I don't want to put our guys in the field in any more danger.

CLARK: Hellerstein is wrong.

Newshounds Transcript:

O'REILLY: I agree with that, but I don't want to put our guys in the field in any more danger.

CLARK: I certainly don't want to put them in danger, either.

O'REILLY: OK. Hellerstein is wrong.

----------------

The FOX transcript left out the part where O'Reilly says the 82nd Airborne who did it. The truth is the 82nd Airborne did not do it, the Germans did the Malmedy Massacre not the 82nd Airborne. And it has Clark saying Hellerstein is wrong, when O'Reilly said it, and they left out the part where the General says he dont want to put the troops in danger either.

So how can we believe anything from O'Reilly or the FOX transcripts when they are highly edited and full of errors. Their credibility just went to zero, it was already there by me and most people on the left, but now we have proof their credibility is zero.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bill O'Reilly Voted World's Worst by Keith Olberman

On his September 14 radio show, Fox News host Bill O'Reilly publicly wished that Hurricane Katrina had flooded the United Nations building in New York. O'Reilly then added: "And I wouldn't have rescued them."

O'REILLY: Bush to address the U.N., says we must be steadfast in battling terrorism. I'm sure all the U.N. people fell asleep. They don't really care about anything over there at all. I just wish Katrina had only hit the United Nations building, nothing else, just had flooded them out. And I wouldn't have rescued them.

OLBERMAN: But your winner, the big giant head, Bill O‘Reilly on his radio show saying, “I just wish Katrina had only hit the United Nations building, nothing else, just had flooded them out. And I wouldn‘t have rescued them.”

Bill evidently does not realize that, if the U.N. at 48th Street and 1st Avenue in New York City got flooded out by some 50-foot wave, there would be an excellent chance that FOX News at 48th Street and 6th Avenue in New York City would also get flooded out, and only the incredible supply of hot air he keeps in his lungs might keep him above the flooding water.

If you watch his show, does he get physically dumber as the hour wears on?

Bill O‘Reilly, today‘s worst person in the world.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Right-Wing Idiot Mows Down Crosses at Camp Casey

Larry Northern, 59, of McLennan County, was charged Tuesday with Criminal Mischief Over $1,500 and under $20,000 after a pickup truck tore through a row of white crosses erected by anti-war protesters gathered near the President’s ranch in Crawford.

Bail was set at $3,000.

The crosses bear the names of U.S. military personnel who have died in the war in Iraq.

Can you imagine what O'Reilly would say if a Democrat ran down 500 crosses with the names of US troops who had died in Iraq on them, and the right-wing idiot also ran over American flags. Will O'Reilly call him a traitor and call for him to be tried for treason, hardly, he will probably call for him to get a medal. I predit that O'Reilly will just ignore this story because it was done by a Republican.

Update: As predicted O'Reilly totally ignored this story, not a word about it on the factor, so much for fair and balanced.

Right-Wing Idiot Mows Down Crosses at Camp Casey

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

O'Reilly Said Cindy Sheehan's Behavior Borders on Treason

O'Reilly Smears Cindy Sheehan

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

O'Reilly Has Neo-Con Meltdown After London Terror Attacks, & Col. Hunt calls for hacking the saudi and yemen backs to take all their money, plus he calls for Biblical Justice: O'Reilly Has Meltdown

Yes O'Reilly is a Republican, Read This For Proof: O'Reilly is a Republican

WHO'S - LOOKING - OUT - FOR - ME ?: Read All 5 Episodes Here by Nathan McIntire (Bi-Weekly)

O'Reilly Advocated Violating The Geneva Convention by Bombing Civilian Targets: Kill em All

The Un-Reported Issues O'Reilly Ignores: List of Issues O'Reilly Ignores

Cable News Ratings Web Page: Cable News Ratings & Archive

The Un-Reality Factor: More Proof O'Reilly is a Liar And a Fraud

Radio Factor Dead Last in The Ratings: Drudge Busted O'Reilly For Lying Again

The New Bill O'Reilly Iraq WMD Countdown Clock: O'Reilly WMD Countdown Clock

O'Reilly Statements on WMD's in Iraq: O'Reilly WMD Statements/Spin

O'Reilly Busted by Drudge For Lying About His Book Sales: Drudge vs O'Reilly

Whopper of the Week: Bill O'Reilly: When a Boycott is Not a Boycott

Bill O'Reilly Wants You To Shut Up: O'Reilly Says Shut Up

Bill O'Reilly Page at Rotton.com: O'Reilly Timeline Quotes

Bill O'Reilly is a Coward: O'Reilly Exposed as a Coward

Bill O'Reilly Exposed: O'Reilly Exposed as a Liar/Spinner

O'Reilly Lied About Opposing The Death Penalty: O'Reilly Lied

O'Reilly Asked For Documented Proof Bush Lies: Proof Bush Lied

O'Reilly on Top 10 Conservative Idiot List 11 Times: Top 10 O'Reilly Listing

Barbieri, Tolbert get 4-year extensions; O'Reilly dropped: O'Reilly Radio Show Dropped

Buzzflash Interviews Al Franken: Choke on This O'Reilly: Buzzflash Interviews Al Franken

Franken Chews Up O'Reilly for Lunch And Spits Out Nails: Franken/O'Reilly Part #1

O'Reilly The Conservative Hypocrite Calls Franken an Idiot: Franken/O'Reilly Part #2

Shoot To Kill by Bill O'Reilly: Shoot To Kill (Iraq Looters)

Click Here To Find Out Why O'Reilly Is Un-American: Why O'Reilly is Un-American

Radio 'No Factor': O'Reilly Disaster On The Dial: No Factor On Radio

Boycott The Boycotters (More Proof O'Reilly is Dumb): Boycott The Boycotters

ActNow - Bob Scheer vs. Bill O'Reilly: Bob Scheer vs. Bill O'Reilly

letter From the Editor - Kamiya vs. O'Reilly: Kamiya vs. O'Reilly

Joe Scarborough Admits O'Reilly is a Conservative: O'Reilly is a Conservative

O'Reilly Sticks Foot in Mouth Again: The Unfunny Factor

The War’s Most Unusual Casualty (O'Reilly): OC-Weekly Drops O'Reilly Column

O'Reilly Calls Mexicans Wetbacks: Wetback Comment Interview

War Letter to O'Reilly: War Letter to O'Reilly

Conclusive Proof O'Reilly Is a Conservative: Proof O'Reilly Is a Conservative

O'Reilly's Party Registration & Attorney Letter: Registration Form & Letter to OReilly-sucks.com

Vietnam & Bill O'Reilly: Why Bill Never Talks About Vietnam

Bill Press: 'No-Spin Zone' Nothing But Spin: 'No-Spin Zone' Nothing But Spin

O'Reilly Takes Aim At Clooney: O'Reilly Takes Aim At Clooney

George Clooney Letter to O'Reilly: Clooney Letter to O'Reilly

O'Reilly Blames Clinton For 9-11 Terrorism: O'Reilly Blames Clinton For 9-11

Top 15 Reasons O'Reilly is a Conservative: Top 15 Reasons O'Reilly is a Conservative

I Made a Mistake - By Bill O'Reilly: I Made a Mistake - By Bill O'Reilly

What Fertik vs. O'Reilly Says About The Media: Fertik vs. O'Reilly

More proof Bill is a conservative, his book is listed on the conservative book club web site.

Conservative Book Club.com

And yet more proof Bill is a conservative, he writes for the conservative only www.townhall.com the conservative only Human Events Online.

Human Events

The National Conservative Weekly, conservative news, views, and books

www.humaneventsonline.com

Here is the page they have for him:

www.humaneventsonline.com/search.php?author_name=Bill+O%27Reilly

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Stupid And or Mostly Untrue O'Reilly Quotes -

------------

O'Reilly said this after him and Fox news sued Al Franken for using "fair and balanced" on the cover of his book. The hypocrisy from O'Reilly is stunning. O'Reilly makes a living trying to hurt businesses and people he disagrees with, then he cries foul when someone does it to him or fox news. The guy has lost his fricking mind. He got Ludacris fired by pepsi, and he also called for a boycott of pepsi. That is two examples right there of him trying to hurt businesses and people he disagrees with.

------------

"The main point here is that trying to hurt a business or a person because you disagree with what they say is simply unacceptable in America. And that message has been sent by FOX. There's a principle in play. Vigorous debate is embraced by us, but smear campaigns will be confronted. "

-- Bill O'Reilly Talking Points, The O'Reilly Factor, 8-13-03

------------

"Once the war against Saddam Hussein begins, we expect every American to support our military, and if you can't do that, just shut up. Americans, and indeed our foreign allies who actively work against our military once the war is underway, will be considered enemies of the state by me."

-- Bill O'Reilly, The O'Reilly Factor, 2/26/03

========

Dear Mr. O'Reilly, Here is one quote you may want to think about. And no it's not from one of the liberals you hate so much, it was said by a Republican President.

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."

Theodore Roosevelt, Republican, 1918

========

Americans deserve honest, fair reporting from all news organizations. In this age of terror, we must have accurate information and hear both sides of issues in order to adequately protect ourselves and our families. This is not a conservative/liberal issue. This is an honesty issue. The country needs its premier newspapers to be trustworthy and look out for us, but not so bitterly ideological that they can't report the news straight.

-- Bill O'Reilly Talking Points, The O'Reilly Factor, 5/29/03

------------

"The code of ethics is to tell the truth as you know it and not to distort anything or exclude anything. That's basically the big tent under which we operate..."

-- Bill O'Reilly, Talk of the Nation, NPR, 07/30/02

------------

"I call them a fascist organization, because what they're doing is using terror to further their agenda."

-- Bill O'Reilly on the ACLU, The O'Reilly Factor, 1/9/03

------------

"The Nielsen ratings for May are in. And once again, THE FACTOR was the highest rated cable news program in the world."

-- Bill O'Reilly, The O'Reilly Factor, 05/05/01

------------

"Putting your ego above the welfare of others equals the loss of all credibility."

-- Bill O'Reilly, Talking Points 4-22-2003

Anon,
I roll a big fat Dutchi every night!

Mike,
Randi Rhodes blames Bush and so did Jack Cafferty.
Barnicle did it slickly.
Over at the Daily Kos they're blaming Bush.
Think Progress is blaming Bush.
Crooks and Liars are blaming Bush.
The Left now takes advantage of every tragedy politicizes it now!
If we get a Metero hit, they'll blame Bush!

I know that Olbermann is a threat to conservatives. He uses facts and speaks eloquently. And you can tell he's the opposite of Fox News, just take a look how he treats his guests, with respect.
Is he biased? Yes. But really who isn't? People are angry with him either because he's liberal, criticizes the Bush Administration, or they are O'Reilly or Fox News fanboys. Fox News, whom by the way have their faults like the biased memos leaked, Obama & Clinton smears (not only attacking their policies, but personal), accusations of Liberals being nazis. It's tough hearing the facts.

Olbermann represents the more than half Americans who don't approve with the Bush administration. It's also refreshing to know that he has, let's face it, low ratings, yet he goes on every night saying the most powerful speeches with powerful delivery, backed up with facts that's on the news now. That's why we have OlbermannWatch, who clearly recognizes he is potential network news star.

Anon@21:04,
I Keith has Facts why has this websit called him out on lies many times?

Why does he never condemn the Iranian regime?

Why does he stay silent on Putin's assasination of political opponents?

Why did he support Hizballah against Israel last year?

As for him being nice to guests, yes he only has people that agree with him.

He's Propaganda!

Gosh Pete, why did you leave out Hardball, Tucker, & Dan Abrams show in your ratings 'report'? In other words, you omitted virtually every other MSNBC news related show. Is it because you wanted to be sure Olbermann was at the bottom of your list?....and I guess you really didn't feel like reporting the FACT that KO leads his own network...by a lot!

Posted by: Mike at August 2, 2007 10:49 PM

Gosh Mike. All I did was copy the top 20 shows that TV Newser had as the top 20 in the 25-54 demo. All they had listed was 20....AS IN top 20. Are you that dense?

On the advice of the president, I can't answer any of these questions at this time.

Bush: "I told them we would help (the Minn. bridge collapse victims) with rescue efforts..."

After FEMA's failure in New Orleans? No thanks!

Talking Points O'Reilly (Wed.)

The problem in American journalism today is the blurring of editorial positions with hard news. "The Factor" is a commentary program. We give opinions here. Shepard Smith anchors a hard news broadcast. He delivers straight information. Again, there's nothing wrong with NBC News editorializing left. But when their liberal views dictate what hard news stories they cover, you have a problem.

Do the Righties here truly confuse opinion and news pieces so readily?

If so, I hope you don't confuse that tube of Preparation H for toothpaste the next time you brush your teeth, or your neighbor's truck for your own car on the next commute, or W. for an honest man, or... well, you get my point, or do you?

"During the Clinton administration, never more than 22 billion spent on infrastructure. Bush spent 54 billion in 2001 and is now spending 79 billion in 2008 which is a 46% increase."

Hey Factor, did you bother to "factor in" that costs for materials and labor have gone UP since 2000? I mean, just look at the price of fuel to run the trucks and jackhammers - that alone has TRIPLED in 8 years. So of course Bush has spent more money than Clinton - you'd have to JUST TO KEEP THINGS THE SAME as in 2000!

correct me if i'm wrong, but wouldn't one expect fox news to have the highest rating? They are the only network with a conservative viewpoint. They have a monopoly on it. So, anyone who is pro-war pro-bush would obviously watch fox news and not cnn.

CNN = Faux News Lite

Gosh Mike. All I did was copy the top 20 shows that TV Newser had as the top 20 in the 25-54 demo. All they had listed was 20....AS IN top 20. Are you that dense?

Posted by: pete at August 3, 2007 12:23 AM

Yes, he is.....

HE DIDN'T BALME BUSH!!!!!

And by the way, if you haven't figured it out yet, the extreme right discusts ME these days.

Posted by: Mike at August 2, 2007 11:41 PM

Is it just me or does this guy seem to have severe problems?

heh....

Of course Mike has severe problems.
Why else would he post here, like the rest of us?

I don't have an issue with a conservative perspective on news, in fact I prefer to have more qualified sources on both ends of the spectrum. But as the recent purchase of the Wall Street Journal implies, that's not the latest trend. (has Soros purchased any newspapers recently or is he still buying Halliburton stock?). I'm truly going to miss the integrity of that grand old journal.

With it's relentless tripping over the most basic facts, malicious or not, Fox News lost credibility for me a long time ago, even before W. was in the White house.

Facts are facts, but reporting them is a little like being one of several witnesses at the scene of an crime or car wreck. Chances are, there will be some slight incongruities among the group of witness testimonies gathered because of the individual POVs. The folks whose stories are significantly off-line or even self-contradicting are the ones that raise red flags, making the testimony suspect to fraud.

The perspective Fox News chooses to present itself (conservative, liberal, taoist, moonie, Texan, whatever)is academic if their professional journalists use faulty single-source stories (or simply attributed to "some people...") and ad hoc commentary blended in with the so-called hard news. Fox is certainly not alone, but they're the most obvious to me.

On the other hand, as a marketing tool, FNN is genius, if only worthy of the same editorial respect as the Auto section of your local newspaper for unadulterated news.

That said, it leaves me wondering what the mission is behind owning a news network, or newspapers, if the the content adjacent to the advertisements isn't worth respecting.

Although inflammatory content, controversial commentators, and nekkid chicks on Page Three may drum up more viewers and subscribers, none of these elements are a community service to anyone.

Ah, well. That reminds me, I need to cancel my subscription to the WSJ.

anon 2:42,

Reading that reminds me of a favorite Fugazi tune:

BLUEPRINT

I'm not playing with you,
I'm not playing with you,
I'm not playing with you,
I clean forgot how to play.
But you can still come around,
In fact I invite you down,
Maybe together we can wipe that smile off your face.
'Cause what a difference, what a difference, what a difference
A little difference would make.
We'll draw a blueprint, it must be easy,
It's just a matter of knowing when to say no or yes.
Frustrating, frustrating, always waiting for the bigger axe to fall.
A patient game that i can't find my way to play.
Never mind what's been selling,
It's what you're buying
and receiving undefiled.

you people keep droning on about the "left blaming Bush" for this bridge accident, and I "don't have a clue" where you are getting all this crap from?

Posted by: Mike at August 2, 2007 10:22 PM

>>>Some clues for you: From the Kos Kiddies.....

"My head damn near exploded when I read that. Un-fucking-believable.

If Shrub wants to know who the hell to blame, all he needs to do is look into a mirror. Rat-bastard."

>>>Your pals at huffpo....

"500 billion stolen by Cheney and his energy minions - There's little left for fixing things here. So Bush-Cheney is responsible for the bridge falling.
Is that the summer-attack Bush-Cheney were talking about?"

>>Need more clues? Now you can actually say you aren't "clueless" anymore.

Hey, royal jackass:

Are those from actual POSTS, or are they from the COMMENTS section? There is a difference, you know. As in "The views of this commenter DO NOT necessarily reflect the views of this community" type of difference.

Or should I go troll some of outer wingnuttia for the theories that this was "sabotage" by illegal immigrant construction crews?

Minn. Bridge Problems Uncovered in 1990
Full story: http://preview.tinyurl.com/ysnkhd

Hmmm... OK, trying to be as apolitical as possible here, but I saw this story on AP wire tonight and something seems to be missing. Yes, I know it's a developing story, but still...

So, the bridge that collapsed in Minnesota was inspected and repaired with increasing frequencies throughout the 1990s. And by 2005, the feds called it structurally deficient, a 50 out of 100 on a structural stability scale.

But Governor Pawlenty says the state was never warned that the bridge needed to be closed or immediately repaired.

I understand it's a states issue, no debate about that here, but I'm sincerely curious how federal inspection becomes a process down to the actual repairs and subsequent inspections.

The way I read it, sounds like Pawlenty's pushing back on the feds. It implies that, sure, the feds inspected it but didn't express urgency.

Whose job is it to determine scoring 50 out of 100 is significant enough to warrant equally-significant concern. How are points on this sclae determined? Who develops the time lines for the repairs?

Tony Snow's quote, somewhat artfully, doesn't shed much light on what happens between the fed's findings and the states' resulting action on repairs.

It assume someone with the state would be in that position, but if anyone can confirm that and possibly provide a basic overview about how this process is supposed to work, it would be much appreciated here.

Thanks.

Forgive the dyslexic typing, it's later than i thought... *yawn*

Mike responded "Brandon, did you even read any of my posts? Did you choose to ignor every point for any particular reason?
Oh yes, I forget...you are hopelessly biased and personally vested in trying to make this man look just as bad as you possibly can. John-O said nothing about the "top 20" in his post. An honest list would include ALL related shows and ALL pertinent information. Arn't ommisions like that the VERY thing you keep railing about in your criticisms of KO?"

Mike, you obviously have a reading disability on top of your existing mental problems. Read John's posts again. That list is clearly labeled TOP 20. What part of that don't you understand???????

And you're lecturing me on not reading posts? Hell, you can't even get the concept of a list clearly labeled Top 20 and thought there was something sinister about Olbermann being placed last on that list. God help you man. And you clearly need help--fast!

P.S. To see the other liberal loon theories check out HuffPo and Democratic Underground on why this bridge supposedly collapsed. Yeah, you guessed it, it's all Bush's fault. I stubbed my toe last night--was that Bush's fault too?

Dammit Brandon and Pete....that Top 20 Ratings list should have included at least 40 to 50 shows, so as to keep our fearless leader from the embarrasment of being shown at the bottom. You should have at least included enough programs in the "Top 20" list to show how much better Keith performs than that fool that thinks he's the boss, Abrams.

Mike, BTW, KO sends his thanks for the defense....especially the way you twisted the fact that the boss in in 20th Place on list of 20 (you know, last), and the fact that you missed that it said "Top 20" at the top of the list, in to personal attacks on the haters. Well done. You have acheived level 4 in Olbyology.

Mike seemed very angry and wishy-washy last night.

Here are some delusional highlights if you missed 'em.

Mike said-
The left is only having "honest discussions about the current state of America's infrastruture, and NO Bush bashing"
FACT:
DailyKOs and Think Progress have countless posts bashing Bush and the Republican Governor for budget cuts causing the decay of the Minnesota infrastructure. Fact is their road budget has grown during their tenure.

Mike said-
"you omitted virtually every other MSNBC news related show. Is it because you wanted to be sure Olbermann was at the bottom of your list?"
FACT:
Come on- is this pinkie that delusional? Should we list all daily news shows to make him appear in the top 20%?

Mike said-
"Given the choice between leading (by a lot) in a lower rated Network, or trailing at a higher rated network, I believe I would choose the former."
FACT:
At every single news network- the highest ratings for that network are in the 8-9 time slot. Guess who has that prime time slot? KeithO, so being tops at MSNBC is not a reflection of popularity or talent. Its a primetime thing.

Mike- your endless defense of Keith is more embarrassing with each day. At least you exposed yourself as one of KeithO's biggest fans. Got his signed book? Oh you are the one.

Quit iling on Mike.

I think that the Mike from last night was an imposter who hijacked his name... so be kind. He has never shown that much ignorance in one day.

quit PILING on... PILING on, not iling on.
Sorry- my 'p' is iffy.

Only in America even a tragedy will be measured for ratings.

Did we turn into O'Reilly Watch yet?

I laughed my @$$ off watching Olby squirm at a feeble attempt to try to actually defend "Bill-O" but simultaneously still make Mike Stark seem justified in his actions. And true to form, O'reilly was attacked following KO's 'sincere' spiel, which I was actually expecting. Formulaic as always, eh Keith?

BTW, wasn't Rush "the comedian" Limbaugh out Thursday and yet he's still nominated for the bronze on the WPITW. Musn't been leftover from Wednesday's show but since 'Meltdown' was forced to cover the bridge collapse, no right-wing attacks. Pity.....

I cant believe that some morons here are proud that Olberbutt is a top ratings getter for MSNBC. That's like saying a greyhound is leading a sprint race vs. all tortoises. The only reason why he is top ratings getter for M-mess NBC is because of the time slot that he is on, 8pm.-prime time for all cable news stations. If he was on at 7 or at 9pm, his audience would be cut to half-meaning from 10 people to 5. Trust me, the little audience that he does get is because of the time he is on, not because of the brilliant and insightful news that he offers. As any intelligent viewer would know, his news is based on news from far left sites like Air America and Media Matters, lies, puppet guests and venegance.

Its funny Mike tells me if I dont like Olbermann to change the channel, because he has his other eye on the chat room with 13 year olds, he must believe this is a site for those who Like Olbermann

Lest ye forget, the founding father of this site, the Hon. Robert Cox, gave birth to this site as an area to defend the truth. It has nothing to do whether you are on the left or the right, as true Simpletons such as Mike try to cast you as. It has to do with Truth, Olbermann is a card carrying member of the Democratic Party who mails his show in every night in a sea of "news" hidden as leftist blogs, and talking points from the DNC, served with a nightly slap at a man who kicks his ass every night in the ratings

Funny thing is, I'm not even a Fan of O Reily, but if Olbermann had True talent hed be able to take O Reily down on the merit of his own talent, and he can't do it

Oh, and by the way, Mike stars in to Catch Predator tonight at 10 on the MSNBC doc block

Dear Mr. loser,

If this site is concerned with truth, why is it obsessed with the size of Olbermann's butt? Or, his "tan"? Seems like this site is simply a smear site.

And, ratings seldom are proportional to truth, son...

Ratings are seldom proportional to truth?
I guess Im gonna have to sit here, pick my teeth with my feet, and ponder that one over

The truth is, Keith is last or near last every night on a nightly basis no matter what you think his truth is

Ha Ratings seldom proportional to truth, hahahaha

the moonbats who post here also worship an idiot who last week showed you topless dummies, incessant dick jokes, Michael Musto, a sea of slams against women, and a nightly barrage of insults of all manner to a guy who just continues to make him his bitch in the ratings

Ha ratings proportional to truth, ahhahahahahahahaha

I think that the Mike from last night was an imposter who hijacked his name... so be kind. He has never shown that much ignorance in one day.

Posted by: benson at August 3, 2007 9:21 AM

Benson, it was him. No one would hijack his name. No one makes feeble attempts at defending the orange one as mike does. He who has professed "ratings don't matter" in the past was suddenly defending the orange ones ratings!

He has nothing else to do with his life but post his moronic rantings, I plead, I say Mike go see the world, leave the computer alone, stop the chatting, doesn't listen, posts until he passes out and Mom comes downstairs to tuck him in

Are those from actual POSTS, or are they from the COMMENTS section? There is a difference, you know. As in "The views of this commenter DO NOT necessarily reflect the views of this community" type of difference.

Or should I go troll some of outer wingnuttia for the theories that this was "sabotage" by illegal immigrant construction crews?

Posted by:coward at August 3, 2007 3:00 AM

You are in way over your head, run along, patsy.

Why is Keith Olbermann obsessed with young young women? brittany, paris, lindsey, oh, and his own better half, katy. His obsession with Harry Potter ( the only 50 year old I know with THAT particular obsession, perhaps it's because his daughte...er..girlfriend is a fan of the juvenile series)is not normal. It doesn't take Frazier Crane to figure out Keith has some seriously stunted emotions and cannot relate to grown up women, with the exception of his overbearing doting mother. We all know the bathtub stories, but is it not easily believed that while in the tub, Keith was on the hard line with mommie? This man needs to grow up! Maybe his politics would grow up also.

Ah, well. That reminds me, I need to cancel my subscription to the WSJ.

Posted by: at August 3, 2007 2:42 AM

I think usa today and the old york times would be right up your alley, mrs. philby. No shortage of hate, there. I hear there are some really good hate papers in Michigan, too. You know, all the muslims up there need there hate news, too.

Grow up Keith, and take Mike with you.

More fodder for the uniformed people at DailyKOs and Think Progress. You remember- the ones that have blamed Bush and The Governor for the decline in the roads in Minnesota. Never let a good fact get in the way of your ignorance.

"A 2006 Report from the National Department of Transportation Ranked Minnesota roads and bridges at the top for safety."

Doooh!

Like eating nothing but Twinkie filling, no nutritional value here. Would you like a fried pie with that? Thank you, drive through.

It's Bush's fault!
Halliburton blew up the bridge to cover up the Pat Tillam testimony from Rumsfeld!

Nothing is better than a guy who comes in second in a three man race - AND THEN brags about not coming in last.

The new MSNBC TV commercials... (paraphrasing here) "During Prime time- in the coveted 25-45 demo- MSNBC beat CNN- we are Americas fastest growing news channel".

Woohoo We didn't come in last! Fox News who?

As usual we will be reading Johnny $'s review of Fridays' show LONG before Thurs' Schatz review!

Ror you, Mrs. Philby:

CARACAS, Venezuela: Hollywood star Sean Penn applauded President Hugo Chavez on Thursday as the Venezuelan leader lambasted the Bush administration and demanded an end to war in Iraq.

Chavez met privately with Penn for two hours and praised him as "brave" for standing up to the White House and publicly calling for U.S. President George W. Bush to be impeached.

"In the name of the peoples of the world, President Bush, withdraw the troops from Iraq. Enough already with so much genocide," Chavez said in an auditorium packed with his red-clad supporters.

Penn sat near the front, at times applauding and nodding in agreement. He is the latest in a series of celebrities who have come to visit the socialist leader, including actor Danny Glover and singer Harry Belafonte.

Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.), chairman of the House Appropriations defense panel, has secured the most earmarked dollars in the 2008 military spending bill, $150.5 mil! Looks like he has secured his seat for another term.......bought and paid for.

I don't understand. Who is TVNewser and how did they come up with these numbers?

CABLE NEWS RACE
WEDS., AUG 1, 2007
VIEWERS

FOXNEWS 8 PM BRIDGE 3,743,000
FNC HANNITY/COLMES 3,382,000
CNN KING 3,099,000
FNC GRETA 2,740,000
CNN COOPER 2,604,000
CNN 11 PM BRIDGE 1,883,000
FNC 11 PM BRIDGE 1,799,000
CNN 8 PM BRIDGE 1,635,000
FNC SHEP SMITH 1,502,000
MSNBC 9 PM BRIDGE 1,003,000
CNN DOBBS 970,000
MSNBC 10 PM BRIDGE 954,000
MSNBC OLBERMANN 939,000

LAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAST

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOK, still doesn't answer my question though.

;(

As usual we will be reading Johnny $'s review of Fridays' show LONG before Thurs' Schatz review!

Posted by: paul at August 3, 2007 1:24 PM

As usual you'll be patiently waiting for someone else to tell you what to think...

Pathetic!

4;14- Its called a recap so we don't have to watch his shit show. It gives us insight to the propaganda you losers are eating up!

You are the pathetic one if you watch KeithOs crap! Its slant not news.

Those are the ratings for the cable news world for 8/1...nielsen ratings which tell you over the course of an hour thats how many people are watching a particular thing

TV Newser i believe, and no doubt the idiots here such as mike will correct me if im wrong, is just a website that discusses the state of tv news and gives you the nightly cable ratings

Today must be the day he got caught in the predator sting

""A 2006 Report from the National Department of Transportation Ranked Minnesota roads and bridges at the top for safety."

Doooh!"

All that means, doofus, is that ON AVERAGE the roads throughout the state were safe. It doesn't mean that THIS PARTICULAR ONE was.

I mean, the same Department of Transportation rated this bridge a "50 of 120" in 2006! The structural decay was noted as early as 1990!

As usual, cherry-picking results to fit your facts. Shouldn't expect anything else.

Today must be the day he got caught in the predator sting

Posted by: Mike didint come out to play today at August 3, 2007 5:24 PM

You're probably the same idiot who told him to 'get a life' and 'get off this board.'

Typical wing-nut, never happy, always trying to control others...

>4;14- Its called a recap so we don't have to watch his shit show. It gives us insight to the propaganda you losers are eating up!

You are the pathetic one if you watch KeithOs crap! Its slant not news.

Posted by: benson at August 3, 2007 4:54 PM

First of all, Benson, I DON'T watch Olbermann, so save your uneducated guesses and blanket criticisms for someone who might take them to heart.

Second, if you can't decide for yourself what is and what isn't propaganda, what you should and shouldn't think, and be able to use your very own NeoCon decoder ring to find out what is the truth and what isn't, then you are, indeed, PATHETIC!

Here Benson, read this and experience what is known to the literate world as an 'epiphany':

Bob seems half interested in taking down MSNBC's Keith Olbermann, and half interested in having himself a popular blog, so he spends a lot of time plugging the site, plugging himself, linking to other blogs (pro and anti KO), and generally making an embarrassment of himself.

His paid jackal (is he paid? he doesn't do this every single day of his life for free does he? Oh, that would be sad. But who's funding this project? That's a question worth looking into) is Johnny Dollar.

J$ claims to be a lawyer, and I have no reason to doubt him, the intellectual contortionism he displays in every night's recap of the Countdown show can only be the work of a trained professional liar. No fool is he. Make no mistake, he is not stupid, or deluded. This guy knows what he's doing. He's not one of the sheep, he's one of the guys keeping the sheep stupid by whatever means are necessary.

The idiot sheep in the comment section, have Stockholm Syndrome - except they're too stupid to know they're being held hostage. Johnny Dollar is very effective.

Maybe I need to give more thought to this whole Wingnut Social Order thing. Maybe it really is like a bunch of shepherds, each keeping their respective flocks of slack-jawed morons good and angry, good and hateful, misinformed 100% of the time. Feeding them a steady diet of red meat anti-media, anti-Hillary, anti-"Liberal" scraps to keep them agitated and confused and spewing rhetoric out of every orifice.

Little shepherds get little flocks of retards. Shepherd Bob Cox and his vicious sheepdog Johnny Dollar keep control of a small group of idiots - that's about all they can handle, but their flock is growing in both number and stupidity, so maybe they'll move up to a larger flock someday.
________________________________________________

I disagree with that writer on the subject of johnny fraud, though, he is neither smart, nor persuasive.

Well, at least not in any way other than 'relatively speaking.'

One mans 'epiphany' is anothers 'ho hum, this is a boring observation'. Good work J$, you know how to irritate with the truth.

you people keep droning on about the "left blaming Bush" for this bridge accident, and I "don't have a clue" where you are getting all this crap from?

Posted by: Mike at August 2, 2007 10:22 PM

>>>Some clues for you: From the Kos Kiddies.....

"My head damn near exploded when I read that. Un-fucking-believable.

If Shrub wants to know who the hell to blame, all he needs to do is look into a mirror. Rat-bastard."

>>>Your pals at huffpo....

"500 billion stolen by Cheney and his energy minions - There's little left for fixing things here. So Bush-Cheney is responsible for the bridge falling.
Is that the summer-attack Bush-Cheney were talking about?"

>>Need more clues? Now you can actually say you aren't "clueless" anymore.

Posted by: royalking at August 3, 2007 2:56 AM

Hey, royal jackass:

Are those from actual POSTS, or are they from the COMMENTS section? There is a difference, you know. As in "The views of this commenter DO NOT necessarily reflect the views of this community" type of difference.

Posted by:patsy/why/anon at August 3, 2007 3:00 AM

Patsy, next time you shoot your mout off in defense of someone you should take the time to read and think before you start frothing and typing. "The left" in general was the topic at hand. "Posters" or "commenters" were not mentioned except by you, but, thanks for telling us that they are different. What would we do w/out you.......By the way, shouldn't you be ROFLYAO?

The religion of peace....non barker.
.
OAKLAND -- Police said they recovered firearm evidence connected to the slaying of an Oakland journalist during a series of early morning raids Friday, including one at a bakery linked to a black Muslim group.

Colleagues said Oakland Post editor Chauncey Bailey, 57, had been working on a story about Your Black Muslim Bakery before he was ambushed and slain Thursday morning near the Alameda County courthouse in downtown Oakland.

"The search warrant yielded several weapons and other evidence of value including evidence linking the murder of Chauncey Bailey to members of the Your Black Muslim Bakery," Assistant Police Chief Howard Jordan said.

The pre-dawn raids followed a yearlong investigation into a variety of violent crimes, Jordan said.

Hey, RK, theres something Id like you to respond to at http://www.olbermannwatch.com/archives/2007/08/countdown_cance_1.php#134138 thanks.

stooge, I saw where you called this blog a "hate site" in reference to Sharon posting quotes from the bible, classy, prick. Huffpo ad DailyKos aren't hate sites and this is? Olbyloon/whackjob logic, gotta love it.

Super stratigery genius Barak Sadam Obamanation laid out his wonderful plan to invade Pakistan. He is going to have transporters built so we can beam our troops out of Iraq and into Pakistan since Iran will not let us march the troop across their border into Pakistan. We can also beam troops into Afghanistan since we can't go through Pakistan anymore. Obamanation has now become Obombanation except don't use nukes and only if they are one of our allies. Unfortunately, his plan is not Rummy approved. Hey if were going to start invading allies, why don't we cut our teeth on France.

Well, if you think about it. The very premise of this website is hating Keith Olbermann and his message. You dont agree with it, so every time he messes up or dates someone you think is out of his league you make it your personal mission to point it out to the world. And plus, I've seen you write some very mean comments, especially toward Muslims and Arabic people in general, you call them brown people i think i read. And based on your logic calling dailykos a hate site based on a few comments, this entire website is a huge bag of hate. YOu traffic in it, you hate everything.

Nothing in response, royalfuck? So you're wrong? Very wrong? And you wont admit it, who would have guessed.

Some intelligent liberal needs to convince the Neocon moron Joseph Wilson that his wife was a super secret spy.

CNN with Wolf Blitzer back in 2005:

WILSON: My wife was not a clandestine officer the day that Bob Novak blew her identity.

BLITZER: But she hadn't been a clandestine officer for some time before that?

WILSON: That's not anything that I can talk about. And, indeed, I'll go back to what I said earlier, the CIA believed that a possible crime had been committed, and that's why they referred it to the Justice Department.

She was not a clandestine officer at the time that that article in "Vanity Fair" appeared. And I have every right to have the American public know who I am and not to have myself defined by those who would write the sorts of things that are coming out, being spewed out of the mouths of the RNC...

Next time you're in town for the market, You might want to think about picking up a pair of balls...They really come in handy in the real world

I've seen you write some very mean comments, especially toward Muslims and Arabic people in general, you call them brown people i think i read.

Posted by: StealThisOpinion at August 3, 2007 9:39 PM

You thought wrong, mike jr. "you're wrong!" as mike sr would say. The only difference is I'm right. Show me 1 post where I used the word "brown" or any hatred toward muslims or Arabs.

And based on your logic calling dailykos a hate site based on a few comments, this entire website is a huge bag of hate.

Posted by: StealThisOpinion at August 3, 2007 9:39 PM

Nice language in your posts. One question. If this is a "huge bag of hate" as you claim, why are you here and not hanging out at the ever so loving daily kos you love and defend so dearly?

Hmm....where has Mikey been today...I keep expecting him to come claim his award from Olby for "Best Attacking Defense of KO without Actually Addressing the Point" and yet he is curiously absent.

My take, in my best Olby-form....Some report that Mike ran like a little bitch from the numerous commenters that pointed out his attacks showed a total lack of reading comprehension or substance in supporting KO, asking that a TOP 20 list include more items in order not to show KO last.

I think we've heard this one before :
"Show me where I said Fox News is a left wing site." ( he did)
And we've seen this hypocrisy:
"The AP is biased"..and then shortly after he uses the AP as a source.
And we all laughed at the Jerry Lewis Nutty Professor mangling the definition of a double negative.
Yes boys and girl, one of the few constants we have in life are death, taxes and the Royalfuck-up making a fool of himself.

Posted by: Why Do U care? at August 3, 2007 11:37 PM

Patsy, nice lies. I never said "Fox News is left wing," asswipe. Keep trying.
Secondly, the ap is biased. So what if I posted an ap as a source, asswipe. You have posted Fox News links, right, asswipe?
Thirdly, "usually never" is a double negative, asswipe. Now, get back to your happy dance for the soldier getting 15 years for defending your sorry ass, asswipe.

Patsy, nice lies. I never said "Fox News is left wing," asswipe. Keep trying.
Secondly, the ap is biased. So what if I posted an ap as a source, asswipe. You have posted Fox News links, right, asswipe?
Thirdly, "usually never" is a double negative, asswipe. Now, get back to your happy dance for the soldier getting 15 years for defending your sorry ass, asswipe.

Posted by: royalking at August 4, 2007 12:05 AM

No, Royal Douche, 5 asswipes does not make you right...

Hmmm, I don't see "Fox News is left wing" anywhere, cause I didn't say it, asswipe.
Secondly, anyone with half a brain knows the ap is biased, horribly, asswipe.
Thirdly, the list of double negatives was not a complete list, just a few examples, asswipe. I highly recommend hooked on phonics for people like you. Oh, and a good shrink.

In addition of publishing original content, AP provides an exchange service among it's subscribing members, thus "associated press"

Some of the members' stories that are picked up by the service certainly could stand deeper scrutiny before distribution, so some of perceived bias (of a variety of stripes actually) is likely a result of inconsistent editorial review, or supplied bias, than an inherit political bias at AP Corp.

"Secondly, anyone with half a brain knows the ap is biased, horribly, asswipe."

HATE SPEECH!!! THE OLBERMANNWATCH IS A HATE SITE!!!!!! AHHHHHHHHH

and as further proof that this website harbors hate speech and thus is a hate site

"Shut your mouth you dumb right wing fuck head. I'll kill you by gassing you with my immigrant-food farts and then sick my pack of welfare queens on you"

http://www.olbermannwatch.com/archives/2006/08/countdown_with_106.php

"My occasional name changing is meant to be humorous, and is."
-RK

This quote isnt hateful, it just made me laugh cuz you're so proud of your little name changes but they're so freaking lame.

"Thanks for proving vokie is a troll and probably a muslim, just a guess."
Posted by royalking at April 10, 2007 4:14 PM

Using the word Muslim in a derogatory sense.

"Do us a favor Blow yourself up like your buddies do!"

"Our enemies are the muslim SAVAGES that commit these atrocities every day in the name of thier god."

"Go Fuck Yourself, Senator Leahy"

oo, and a threat from Robert Cox himself
""I DO AND IF YOU ARE PLANNING TO WORK AT NBC OR MSNBC YOU WOULD DO WELL TO KEEP THAT IN MIND. DON'T KID YOURSELF THAT MESSING WITH ME IS A COST-FREE EXERCISE FOR YOU."

With the DailyKos, assuming an average of 100,000 people a day since its inception in 2002(they average over 500,000 a day now), and assuming that you could find 100 on the website that were hateful, that would still only be representative of .075x10^-9% of the DailyKos population, hardly a representative number, however Bill O'Reilly and RoyalKing seem to think otherwise, despite only having found about...oh, 50 comments total in the 5 years the DailyKos has been in existence...just a thought.

Now, I know I can find them because there are over 300 posts with the word fuck alone on this website, but assuming an average viewership of 10 people a day in the 3 years OlbermannWatch has been in existence and that we could only find 100 on here that would representative of approx 2.7% of the population

But that doesnt matter, because RoyalKing still seems to think that the DailyKos is a hate site, what a dim-witted dolt. Until RoyalKing decies to be a man and own up that he was wrong about the DailyKos, HuffPo, and MediaMatters being hate sites the OlbermannWatch will hereby be known as a hate site.

Semantics is the best the royalfraud can come up with.
You were debunked by your own favorite source and then you made the above statement.

Posted by: patsy at August 4, 2007 11:41 AM

Baldface lying and spinning, sheer signs of spolbyloon desperation! I love it!

Who is this "why" guy? Is he for real? What a dolt.

haha!!!! Rk made an anon screen name to back up his points. So RoyalKing, you didnt even aknowledge my post...does that mean that you, in fact, too much of a vagina to admit you were wrong? Twice? You were presented with evidence of slander, libel, perjury, and trying to spin an argument to your advantage, "all I saw was me exposing your hypocrisy on the bj matter" when that had nothing to do with the argument, the point, and it was an argument that you tried to get me to take the bait on, and you still lost it!

I cant believe you are able to show your face around here, Id be fucking embarassed if I were you.

"why" is the same guy that posts "paranoid bushwipes" all over this blog. Very telling of his mentality. Oh, and the mile long left wing hate posts, those are always his, too. Such a nice fellow, isn't he?

RK has nothing left than to pretend he's someone else now.
His humiliation just keeps on snowballing.

Posted by: Why Do U care? at August 4, 2007 11:56 AM

This paronia spew from someone who posts under "a dozen or more names!" Plus anonyloon!!!!!

haha!!!! Rk made an anon screen name to back up his points

Posted by: StealThisOpinion at August 4, 2007 11:55 AM

Think what you want, fools. Others see your idiocy, too. Stooge, when you were counting "F" words, did you notice or mention that 99% were yours, "why's", O'Leilly's, and SLOB's? Of course not, you're a hack because they're all splobyloons.

"A dozen or more names". Really !

I must be prolific. ( look it up)

Posted by: Why Do U care? at August 4, 2007 12:03 PM

I think Johnny knows what he is talking about. No, you're not prolific, just an idiot.

"Think what you want, fools. Others see your idiocy, too. Stooge, when you were counting "F" words, did you notice or mention that 99% were yours, "why's", O'Leilly's, and SLOB's"

Ya know what, that doesnt matter. You and Bill O seem to think every hateful comment on DailyKos all .07x10^-9% of them, is representative of the community. So every comment thats ever been posted on here is obviously the views of the contributors here, right?

Is that all you have to say? You're just making yourself look dumb now. You respond to what you can out of my posts and everything that makes you look like the fucktard that you are...yeah, ignored. Grow up.

Its taken him almost a week just to come up with evidence to the DailyKos, HuffPo, and MediaMatters being hate sites...he's not very timely.

Bush: Quick action on foot-in-mouth

By ROMINA SPINA, Associated Press Writer 1 hour, 29 minutes ago

Washington - President George Bush said Saturday that authorities were doing "everything in our power" to track the source of a foot-in-mouth disease outbreak and wipe out the animal illness before it wreaked economic devastation.

Run Royal Douche! Run!!

"Think what you want, fools. Others see your idiocy, too. Stooge, when you were counting "F" words, did you notice or mention that 99% were yours, "why's", O'Leilly's, and SLOB's"

Ya know what, that doesnt matter.

Posted by: StealThisOpinion at August 4, 2007 12:16 PM

Classic spolbyloon tactic. "It doesn't matter!" says stooge. Oh yes, it matters. You people are the ones that, acording to your logic, make this site a "hate site." It definately matters. How's that rotten egg taste? Leave and take your hateful cohorts with you.

Keep your face buried deeeeeep in the bbcrap, whatever you do!

Actually, every post I wrote up there was people defending conservative values. Either way, my whole point, dumbass, was that you can NOT use comments posted on a website to judge the website as a whole, but obviously you arent intelligent to make that assesment so I had to do it for you. Would you like me to use the airplane maneuver next time I had to feed you? Would that make baby happy? Whos a cute little baby, yes you are, cute little royalking, so adorable in his ignorance and denial...

... yes, we will continue to read newspapers, news web sites etc.

Presumably, you'll avoid AP stories, however? I hear the AP is a left-wing hatchet job widely disregarded by every serious newspaper and media source in America. In my own experience, AP seems on-target, but I understand I harbor views well out of the mainstream as well.

I think we should call Monsieur Royale "Drumstick," not the poultry type, but the Nestle's type with nuts on top and none below.

Clucker has finally come to the realization that he/she/it is far left to the mainstream of middle America. See, Olbermannwatch has worked!