Comedy gold!

Why are the purveyors of this site not good at anything site related ?

Posted by: Bill O'lielly at September 5, 2007 1:33 PM

They give your stinkning left wing, piece of shit existance, somewhere to hang out. I think you should reconsider.

Yep, J$, you have accurately captured and set to music the same uberlib propaganda spin that Olby has belched out for every single Speshul Education Komment. Listening to those komments constituted a waste of time (which we will never get back). This version is efficient. Thanks to J$ and OW for ensuring that we won't have to waste our lives (and our intellects) on any more of Olby's spitfest diatribes.

i would actually watch olbermann a lot more if this was his show.

Oralmann needs to steal this idea from Owatch and somehow incorporate it into his show. Maybe it would get some real viewers then.

Liberal Hypocrisy.......

The winner of the Hypocrite of the Year award goes to Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton(d), with Mike coming in a close second and clucker/philby/rudy/jennifer third. Even though the year is far from over and is likely to have its fair share of hypocrisy, Mrs. Clinton’s comment on the need to compromise to achieve political and social progress has to outclass any other current or future entrant.

This woman, who refused to change a comma or a word of her thousand-page-plus healthcare reform bill and, as a result of her intractable stubbornness, sent the bill down to defeat along with the Democratic Congress and almost her husband’s presidency, is daring to show herself now as the apostle of compromise.

Unbelievable!

Here’s what she recently said:

“Ultimately, to bring change, you have to know when to stand your ground, and when to find common ground. You need to know when to stick to principles and fight, and know when to make principled compromises. You can’t always demand everything your own way, or you’ll never get anything done.”

For Hillary to give a sermon on compromise in politics is a bit like the Ayatollah preaching religious tolerance. This is the same woman who:

• Refused to release the Whitewater documents, triggering the appointment of a special prosecutor;

• Wouldn’t settle the Paula Jones su it — with no apology, admission or damages required — out of simple stubbornness;

• Insisted on the secrecy of her healthcare reform task force’s deliberations until a federal court ruled her position invalid and who still won’t release her first lady healthcare reform documents until after the election;

• Insisted on the travel office firings even when they became a total political embarrassment;

• Will still not apologize for her vote for the Iraq war.

And, in the Senate, where she pretends to have developed her penchant for compromise, she still has not succeeded in passing a single major piece of legislation.

Compromise was not, to put it mildly, uppermost in her thinking in 1993 and 1994. After it was clear that her healthcare package was doomed to defeat, I suggested that she adopt a fallback position and support the bill first introduced by Sen. Bob Dole (R-Kan.). The Dole bill provided for portability of healthcare benefits as workers migrated from job to job. Dole had filed it in the heady days of 1993, when healthcare reform was still popular. Needing a Republican alternative to Hillary’s program, he proposed this important reform.

Knowing that Dole would have to let it pass because it was his bill, I urged Hillary to push the Dol e bill, arguing that she could take the achievement to the nation in 1996 as evidence of progress on healthcare.

She rejected the idea out of hand, as she did all healthcare compromises, insisting that “unless we fix the whole system, we’ll just make things worse.” She said that “if we tinker with this change or that change, it will be like squeezing a balloon. One end will be smaller but the other will just get larger.” She worried that insurance companies would raise their rates if the bill passed.

Now she is the bearer of the torch of compromise. If we could believe her conversion was sincere, it would make her less dangerous as a possible president. But it clearly is not. Her newfound desire for compromise is driven by her nee d to appeal simultaneously to the Democratic base and general electorate. She has to explain to the partisans of the left why she must adopt positions tailored to win the November election on the Iraq war and other issues.

Her advocacy of compromise is just one part of her Labor Day repositioning. She has also changed her campaign slogan from “Experience” to “Change + Experience,” because she feels uncomfortable ceding the ground of change in a Democratic primary to Obama. Of course, the only change that her candidacy seems to offer is a different first name in the perennial Bush/Clinton dichotomy that has gripped the nation for the past 20 years.

In reality, Hillary’s focus on compromise and the need for change takes place aga inst the backdrop of an increasingly successful war in Iraq. With Bush now admitting that some troop withdrawals will be necessary and the Democrats conceding that all the troops cannot be withdrawn, Hillary and the Democratic candidates face the prospect of losing their best issue — the failed war.

So, if your position is increasingly untenable, prepare your voters for compromise.

And that my friends is why HRC is utterly unelectable in '08!

Wow. Well that IS definitive. Philadelphia sports talk radio. What more could you ask?

I wonder if KO will name Hill. worst person in the world? He is such an azz-wipe!

Clinton cronie on the run!

Dems Dirty Donor Norman Hsu Fails to Show for Bail Reduction Hearing Leading to Speculation He's On the Run
Wednesday, September 05, 2007

DEVELOPING STORY: California businessman Norman Hsu, a former New York apparel executive and major contributor to Democratic candidates and causes, failed to appear for a bail reduction hearing Wednesday, leading to speculation that he again is a fugitive from the law, FOX News has learned.

Hsu's attorneys say they do not know his whereabouts, and that their client did not surrender his passport.

Oh gee, the people who argue on the radio about whether a catch was in bounds or not are gaga over Olbermoronn's comments. Well, at least we know his intended audience.

Plus, you know this moron isn't smart enough to string two sentences together himself, so this is obviously someone else's material, of which, of course, he won't reveal for further getting laughed at.

Ho Hum...another day..another laughable post by the Royalfraud.

Posted by: Why don't you think at September 5, 2007 7:53 PM

This spew coming from the Queen of the cut and pasters. Too damn funny!

John Gibson mentioned "bathtub boy" on on his radio show today. Anyone else hear it?

Nice little Rap....keep it up

c'mon... theres got to be way more sound bites available for use... keith is a veritable treasure trove of lunacy. but its a start :)

Democracy is coming to the U.S.A.

by Leonard Cohen

great song !
Posted by: Why don't you think at September 5, 2007 9:39 PM

If I am correct, we have a band of candidates from the Republican nomination who are non-Christian, non-patriotic scoundrels. Obviously, that is a gross generalization, but if this group doesn't make you at least a bit uncomfortable, I have to wonder about you.
Posted by: Clucker at September 5, 2007 10:36 PM

Well, it most certainly would be a gross generation.. However, if you guys work just a bit harder, maybe you'll get so adept at conflating every political contest into a combination of Appomattox, D-Day, and Bunker Hill, that we'll all just go with the ridiculous rhetoric and forget that in the process you've managed to trivialize historic struggles and to make paid campaign consultants look like beacons of restraint in comparison....

Here's the real motivation behind Olbermann's Special Komments--his new book, to be published on 12/26/07:
Truth and Consequences: Special Comments on the Bush Administration's War on American Values
by Keith Olbermann

Filler!

Why don't you think: It is not shocking that sports nerds in Killadelphia, a rotting corpse of a city that has been destroyed by leftist city government administrations for years, would listen to a meathead like Olby. Incompetence rules in the murder capital of the U.S., and Olby would fit in nicely under that circumstance.

Herr Olbermann is so obnoxious, so freaky, so politically correct--he reminds me of some organ grinders obnoxious, freaky, politically correct pet monkey.

Why don't you think: Think again.

By a olby fangirl called "weekends without countdown" (this is going to make you feel very icky all over-----obly's fans=beefy chicks not into house cleaning.) :o

http://keitholbermann.org/ko_forum/viewtopic.php?t=11159

(If the link is lost go to the KOorg fan forum under "Estrogen Brigade")

Philly- mostly a minority city, minority=Democrats; Democrats=Olbyloon lover, do the math

obviously, in a city where blacks are the majority, they will love any kind of BS that comes out of Olbermutt's mouth