Buy Text-Link-Ads here
Recent Comments

    follow OlbyWatch on Twitter

    In

    John Gibson Welcomes Back the Infamous, Deplorable Keith Olbermann

    tonyome wrote: <a href="http://twitchy.com/2014/07/28/voxs-laughable-praise-of-keith-olber... [more](11)

    In

    Welcome Back, Olby!

    syvyn11 wrote: <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/keith-olbermann-reviving-worst... [more](9)

    In

    Former Obama Support/Donor Releases Song Supporting Romney/Ryan: "We'll Take It Back Again" by Kyle Tucker

    syvyn11 wrote: @philly I don't see that happening. ESPN has turned hyper left in recent... [more](64)

    In

    Blue-Blog-a-Palooza: Ann Romney Edition!

    djthereplay wrote: By mkdawuss on August 29, 2012 6:17 PM Will John Gibson be having a "Red-B... [more](4)

    In

    No Joy in Kosville...Mighty Olby Has Struck Out

    djwolf76 wrote: "But the FOX-GOP relationship (which is far more distinguished and prevalen... [more](23)

    KO Mini Blog



    What's in the Olbermann Flood Feed?
    Subscribe to Olbermann Flood Feed:
    RSS/XML

    KO Countdown Clock


    Warning: mktime() [function.mktime]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/New_York' for 'EST/-5.0/no DST' instead in /home/owatch/www/www.olbermannwatch.com/docs/countdown.php on line 5
    KO's new contract with MSNBC ends in...
    0 days 0 hours 0 minutes

    OlbermannWatch.com "My Faves" Set

    OlbermannWatch.com Favorited Photos from other Flickr Users

    Got OlbyPhotos? See some on Flickr? DO NOT email us. Send us a FlickrMail instead. Include a link to the photo. If we like the photo you will see it displayed in the Olby Flickr Flood above.

    New to Flickr? Sign up for a FREE Flickr account!


    Got some OlbyVideo? See some on YouTube? DO NOT email us. Send us a YouTube Messages instead. Include a link to the video. If we like the video you will see it displayed in our favorites list in our YouTube page.

    New to YouTube? Sign up for a FREE YouTube account!

    Red Meat Blog
    Keith Olbermann Quotes
    Countdown Staff Writers

    If they're not on Keith's payroll...

    ...they should be...

    Crooks & Liars
    Daily Kos
    Eschaton
    Huffington Post
    Media Matters for America
    MyDD
    News Corpse
    No Quarter
    Raw Story
    Talking Points Memo
    Think Progress
    TVNewser
    Keith Lovers

    MSNBC's Countdown
    Bloggerman
    MSNBC Transcripts
    MSNBC Group at MSN

    Drinking with Keith Olbermann
    Either Relevant or True
    KeithOlbermann.org
    Keith Olbermann is Evil
    Olbermann Nation
    Olbermann.org
    Thank You, Keith Olbermann

    Don't Be Such A Douche
    Eyes on Fox
    Liberal Talk Radio
    Oliver Willis
    Sweet Jesus I Hate Bill O'Reilly

    Anonymous Rat
    For This Relief Much Thanks
    Watching Olbermann Watch

    Keith Olbermann Fanlisting Site I
    Keith Olbermann Fanlisting Site II
    Keith Olbermann Links
    Olberfans
    Sports Center Altar
    Nothing for Everyone

    Democratic Underground KO Forum
    Television Without Pity KO Forum
    Loony KO Forum (old)
    Loony KO Forum (new)
    Olberfans Forum (old)
    Olberfans Forum (new)
    Keith Watchers

    186k per second
    Ace of Spades HQ
    Cable Gamer
    Dean's World
    Doug Ross@Journal
    Extreme Mortman
    Fire Keith Olbermann
    Hot Air
    Inside Cable News
    Instapundit
    Jawa Report
    Johnny Dollar's Place
    Just One Minute
    Little Green Footballs
    Mark Levin
    Media Research Center
    Moonbattery.com
    Moorelies
    National Review Media Blog
    Narcissistic Views
    Newsbusters
    Pat Campbell Show
    Radio Equalizer
    Rathergate
    Riehl World View
    Sister Toldjah
    Toys in the Attic
    Webloggin
    The Dark Side of Keith Olbermann
    World According to Carl

    Thanks for the blogroll link!

    Age of Treason
    Bane Rants
    The Blue Site
    Cabal of Doom-De Oppresso Libre
    Chuckoblog
    Conservative Blog Therapy
    Conservathink
    Country Store
    Does Anyone Agree?
    The Drunkablog!
    Eclipse Ramblings
    If I were President of USA
    I'll Lay Down My Glasses
    Instrumental Rationality
    JasonPye.com
    Kevin Dayhoff
    Last Train Out Of Hell
    Leaning Straight Up
    Limestone Roof
    Mein BlogoVault
    NostraBlogAss
    Peacerose Journal
    The Politics of CP
    Public Secrets: from the files of the Irishspy
    Rat Chat
    Return of the Conservatives
    The Right Place
    Rhymes with Right
    seanrobins.com
    Six Meat Buffet
    Sports and Stuff
    Stout Republican
    Stuck On Stupid
    Things I H8
    TruthGuys
    Verum Serum
    WildWeasel

    Friends of OlbyWatch

    Aaron Barnhart
    Eric Deggans
    Jason Clarke
    Ron Coleman
    Victria Zdrok
    Keith Resources

    Google News: Keith Olbermann
    Feedster: Keith Olbermann
    Technorati: Keith Olbermann
    Wikipedia: Keith Olbermann
    Wikipedia: Countdown
    Wikiality: Keith Olbermann
    Keith Olbermann Quotes on Jossip
    Keith Olbermann Photos
    NNDB Olbermann Page
    IMDB Olbermann Page
    Countdown Guest Listing & Transcripts
    Olbermann Watch FAQ
    List of Politics on Countdown (by party)
    Mark Levin's Keith Overbite Page
    Keith Olbermann's Diary at Daily Kos
    Olbermann Watch in the News

    Houston Chronicle
    Playboy
    The Journal News
    National Review
    San Antonio Express
    The Hollywood Reporter
    The Journal News
    Los Angeles Times
    American Journalism Review
    Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
    St. Petersburg Times
    Kansas City Star
    New York Post/Page Six
    Washington Post
    Associated Press
    PBS
    New York Daily News
    Online Journalism Review
    The Washingon Post
    Hartford Courant
    WTWP-AM
    The New York Observer
    The Washington Post


    Countdown with Keith Olbermann
    Great Moments in Broadcast Journalism
    Great Thanks Hall of Fame
    Keith Olbermann
    MSM KO Bandwagon
    Olbermann
    Olbermann Watch Channel on You Tube
    Olbermann Watch Debate
    Olbermann Watch Image Gallery
    Olbermann Watch Polling Service
    OlbermannWatch
    OlbyWatch Link Roundup
    TVNewser "Journalism"

    July 2013
    September 2012
    August 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009
    August 2009
    July 2009
    June 2009
    May 2009
    April 2009
    March 2009
    February 2009
    January 2009
    December 2008
    November 2008
    October 2008
    September 2008
    August 2008
    July 2008
    June 2008
    May 2008
    April 2008
    March 2008
    February 2008
    January 2008
    December 2007
    November 2007
    October 2007
    September 2007
    August 2007
    July 2007
    June 2007
    May 2007
    April 2007
    March 2007
    February 2007
    January 2007
    December 2006
    November 2006
    October 2006
    September 2006
    August 2006
    July 2006
    June 2006
    May 2006
    April 2006
    March 2006
    February 2006
    January 2006
    December 2005
    November 2005
    October 2005
    September 2005
    August 2005
    June 2005
    May 2005
    April 2005
    March 2005
    February 2005
    January 2005
    December 2004
    November 2004

    Google

    Olbermann Watch Masthead

    Managing Editor

    Robert Cox
    olby at olbywatch dot com

    Contributors

    Mark Koldys
    Johnny Dollar's Place

    Brandon Coates
    OlbyWatch

    Chris Matthews' Leg
    Chris Matthews' Leg

    Howard Mortman
    Extreme Mortman

    Trajan 75
    Think Progress Watch

    Konservo
    Konservo

    Doug Krile
    The Krile Files

    Teddy Schatz
    OlbyWatch

    David Lunde
    Lundesigns

    Alex Yuriev
    Zubrcom

    Red Meat
    OlbyWatch



    Technorati Links to OlbyWatchLinks to OlbermannWatch.com

    Technorati Links to OlbyWatch Blog posts tagged with "Olbermann"

    Combined Feed
    (OlbyWatch + KO Mini-blog)

    Who Links To Me


    Mailing List RSS Feed
    Google Groups
    Subscribe to Olbermann Watch Mailing List
    Email:
    Visit this group



    XML
    Add to Google
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Subscribe with Bloglines
    Subscribe in NewsGator Online

    Add to My AOL
    Subscribe with Pluck RSS reader
    R|Mail
    Simpify!
    Add to Technorati Favorites!

    Subscribe in myEarthlink
    Feed Button Help


    Olbermann Watch, "persecuting" Keith since 2004


    September 11, 2007
    Keith Olbermann Admits He Is Un-American!

       DrudgeSiren.gif

    And indefensible too. Don't blame us...it's his words:


    Posted by johnny dollar | Permalink | Comments (249) | | View blog reactions

    249 Comments

    seconds after i write something similair, olbermann proves everyone right again...
    stupid olby, doesn't he realize that the grass only *seems* greener on the other side. what a spoiled brat. it is what it is, and he sure as hell can't change ANYTHING. perhaps Oreilly can.

    moron paranoid FASCIST BU$HWIPES!

    "Either you are with us or against us"

    >>moron paranoid FASCIST BU$HWIPES!

    "Either you are with us or against us"

    Posted by: Average American Patriot at September 11, 2007 1:00 AM

    ...FIRST!

    looooooooooooser!!!!!.....

    "Either you are with us or against us"

    Posted by: Average American Patriot at September 11, 2007 1:00 AM

    The most intelligent post patsy has ever made. I agree with you, patsy.

    not a real good day for olbermann here on olbywatch? I bet he's writing a special comment as we speak.

    1:00 am still stands as patsy's most intelligent post. Maybe someday he'll top it. One can only hope......by the way, how's that democratic congress rating holdin' up, or down, I should say?

    What's the difference...

    between Olby and a steamy bag of shit? THE BAG! HA!

    Ah, Olberbama Keithladen finally gives it up...BTW Who was his worst person in the NFL last night? Pat Tillman? Oh, no wait he accused Bush of assasinating Tillman.

    It's a good thing you save the tapes Johnny. They always seem to come in handy.

    What miniscule, ioda of respect I had for the bastard is out the door. The man is nothing but a maggot; not worth his weight in dog shit. Olbermann shouldn't be allowed within a thousand feet of a mike let alone hosting a news show on a cable news network.

    Wait!

    When did Fox News hire qualified reporters?

    Considering the loser that's on MSNBC, Fox could have hired a crack whore and still have someone more qualified than that obnoxious jackass Olberfag.

    I hadn't realize O'Reilly/Hume/etc. had crack habits, but that helps explain the quality of their "work."

    Which begs the question, what the hell is Olby smoking to be even more fucked up than a crack whore?

    Nice clip.

    Unfortunately, you're assuming the typical Fox News fan is literate. But look on the bright side, they're poor listeners.

    Hell, what's more American than the KKK?

    "Hell, what's more American than the KKK?"

    Fox News, apparently.

    Actually, I'd love to see a law suit come out of this.
    I love train wrecks.

    It's a shame we listen to our own eyes and ears and not Olby's bullshit. The man acts all morally outraged when Bush says 'you're either with us or against us' but compares everyone who disagrees with him to the Klan and says they're worse than Al Quada even though he complains about being compared to Al Quada. The man's a whiny bitch who can't take the shit he dishes out to others. If he wants to take the low road, fine, but don't piss and moan when someone returns the favor.

    He's just swiping a page from O'Reilly's book --I'm half-serious about it. It seems to be a venom-to-venom pissing contest.

    Going by the other posts here, we must be borrowing from the same book.

    He's like the snot nosed bratty little kid that throws rocks at you're dog and then runs into his house.

    One day that dog is gona get loose.

    I've never seen this guy debate anything.

    When that day comes.

    Stupid is, as stupid will look.

    I can't wait till this week's ratings come out... then the blue blogs will wax poetically "remember on September 7th, 2007 when our hero Keith beat Oreilley in the covetted demo when we add the DVR numbers?"

    It all comes out in the wash and this anti-american deserves a swift uppercut. My guess is he gets bitch slapped regularly by good americans. They force him to take those random days off to nurse his bruises.

    Good and absolutely fair presentation, J$....Olbermann smears an entire new organization "media outlet" as worse than Al Queda terrorists. My view of his silly reference to the KKK also stands.....How could anyone equate a cable news outlet to a violent and racist organization that worked secretly to oppress people only based on their race or creed?

    Yes, Keith Olbermann....you are anti-American.

    On the heals of these comments...
    saying republicans will attack every country if they remain in power and insisting a news netowk is worse than al queda, the loons have a new matra. do you still stand by this dingbat with his outrageous and unsubstantiated commets?

    he spews this trash out without follow-up. why doesn't someone call this weakling out, so he can dig a deeper hole? he has nothing but rhetoric.

    Loons are MIA- its hard to defend such a whacko...
    He has become a figure of what is wrong with the democrats going into 2008... I hope Hillary goes on his show.

    nice piece...nice theme music.

    King of the loons is unhinged about Fox
    To the viewing public he is a pox
    Except to the leftist Treason Lobby
    Where hating the US is more than a hobby
    Krazy Keith should stick to sniffing jocks

    I eagerly await the day when Keith does a Howard Beale and blows his brains out on national Tv and a nation of Olbyloons will martyr him like he was Martin Luther King or something

    Fact is, having worked for FNC for several years, there is no finer group of people who work harder in the news industry

    Knowing people who work at MSNBC, it is no joke, Olbermanns attacks are written off of web blogs that have been long outlined here. There is no original thought, and the man has no courage to debate anyone from the other side. He fancies himself Edward R Murrow...I knew people who worked with Edward R Murrow and You sir are no Edward R Murrow

    Gibsons bathtub boy stories are 100 percent correct with no level of bshit in them, here is a guy whose tremendously insecure and who will self distruct ineviatbly

    Best to all

    The liberals hatred of Fox News is matched only by their hatred of Bush and the GOP. What they totally fail to take into consideration is that not all conservatives or independents watch Fox or the fact that there are liberals who DO watch Fox, if for no other reason, to stay apprised of what the the GOP talking points are.

    In their black and white world, it's much easier for them to paint all Fox Viewers as GOPers or all GOPers as Fox Viewers. That can't possibly be true given their ratings, their viewership and the testimony of liberals who admit they watch Fox. But the left barks like Pavlov's dog when they hear the words "Fox News". And Olbermann in his comments to Playboy, tried to make the outrageous claim that somehow, Fox is more dangerous than Al Qaeda and is responsible for the murder of thousands of people when it was all the networks who cheerlead for the Iraq war, including Olbermann who was on the air at the time and never voiced a single objection on air to the war. It wasn't just Fox, it was all the networks, but in Olbermann's revisionist thinking, and in that of the mindless viewers who don't question a single word he says ever, it's all suddenly Fox News's fault. It isn't. There are many fingers that can be pointed and as the old saying goes, when you point your finger at someone, there are four more pointing back to you. The "You" in this case would be the Democratic members of Congress and the Senate who voted for the War, it would be ALL the news networks who remained deathly silent during the build-up to war and failed to ask questions, but most importantly, it would be Keith Olbermann who had his own news program at the time of the build-up to war and was just as much a cheerleader as anyone on Fox ever dared to be. Again, revionist thinking somehow is looking over these known facts.

    But again, like Pavolov's dog--mention Fox and these people foam at the mouth, no questions asked. Some have never even watched Fox and have no idea whatsoever what the network is really like, they just make assumptions (usually false) based upon what they have read or heard from fellow liberals. Olbermann plays into that hatred against Fox, using his own personal vendettas to score points with his liberal audience. And they accept what he says, without questioning it, even when they've never watched the network. How is that any different than the "Dittoheads" of Rush Limbaugh? But yet, the liberals try to claim they are smarter, intellectually superior and all of that. And yet, they are not. They are the same, no matter what they try to claim. In fact, they may be far worse.

    Olbermann and his fans seem to think it's the worst thing in the world that conservatives MIGHT watch Fox because it's. . . biased! But they have no problem whatsoever in watching Olbermann who is far more radically to the left than the Fox crew is to the right. They see no contradiction in terms whatsoever in their stance and fail to get the irony of it all.

    In the end, the only thing that separates Olbermann and O'Reilly is that one leans to the left, one leans to the right. Both are egomaniacs. Both use their shows as a bully pulpit. But at least O'Reilly properly labels his program as an opinion show. Olbermann and his fans still insist that he has a news program. Yet Olbermann is far from being a reporter. He doesn't report on-scene from any breaking news story. He never travels to the site of a disaster. He remains firmly anchored to his anchor desk in the safety of the studio. Even the opinion guy, O'Reilly has traveled to Iraq. But not Olbermann, the "news anchor" whose every story choice is all about promoting a specific idealogy tailored to fit his liberal, leftist audience. Olbermann never has anyone on his show with a contrary opinion, no conservatives, no Republicans, no Republican candidates and that is OKAY with them. O'Reilly who does regularly have liberals on is chided because those liberal guests aren't "liberal enough". Huh? Say what?

    Olbermann's biases and his outrageous statements aren't defensible. But yet, his fans try and send out "Let's Support" Keith memes on various websites, trying to spin public opinion towards him. They send out memos asking people to record his program on DVR/TIVO. They flood NBC/MSNBC with letters of support for him. And they never question him or object to a thing he has to say, be it a slam or slur at a female, a strange commentary supporting an admitted felon and dog-fighting, or a mistake, later clarified or apologized for. They insist that's not what he meant to say, even when he apologizes for something. In short, Olbermanns fans believe with all their might he can do or say no wrong. And when he does say or do something they KNOW is wrong, they still pretend he didn't say it or that's not what he meant and they spin accordingly with all their might, never admitting he screwed up, even when he does. If that's not a mindless dittohead, I don't know what else would be. There is NO difference. Yet, they are utterly blind to the irony of it all.

    Keith in Iarq?

    At this point the reception Olbermann would receive in Iraq would be hysterical. They would probably escort his MSNBC caravan through a mine field... oops!

    There are few active military people (not on the NBC payroll) who think Olbermann's act is good for America. Unfortunately I can't say the same for veterans like fellow Mike, who continue to support Keith's fringe rants. Descent is good but to impune our Gen. David Petraeus as a liar is ridiculous.

    So Keith - go to Iraq, and show us you have the same courage as our men in military. That military that you criticize daily.

    Old news O!
    But way to stay on top of things

    You're a day late and a dollar short, O.....go to the KKK thread and see that the ratings "win" was discussed.

    BillyO- did you hear we elected Bush a second time?
    Proof positive Billyboy has dial-up still.

    Pukes Below Average Length Dick:

    "DUMBSHIT! I mean Bovine!

    It breaks my heart to deliver the good news to you, but Dear Moron in Chief has gone from a 70% approval rate to hover around 30% +/-.

    END QUOTE

    Um, Olby/Mike Moore 101. GW's numbers were only in the 70's just after 911 when the world was united until liberal partisanship, pacifism and selfishness sat in. George Bush won the 2004 election with less than a 50% approval rating you dumb son of a bitch.

    ***********************************

    Posts Below Average Intelligence:

    Let me help you with your math, Bovine.

    Around 70% of the AMERICAN PEOPLE IS NOT WITH MORON IN CHIEF.

    END QUOTE

    Let me help you with your math stupid ass. The 30% that still support George Bush are smarter, weathier and better armed than the rest of you fags. They just had a poll in North Carolina that found 51% agree with the way GW is handing the war in Iarq. Just because a bunch of Yankee fags or left coast fags count in a poll doesn't represent the whole country. That's like that stupid bitch Sanchez throwing up a BBC/ABC poll to Petreaus and the Ambassador. That stupid bitch couldn;t make it int he kitchen, damned sure couldn't make it in the bedroom so she thinks she can question a four star general. Hillarious.

    ***********************************

    Posted by An Average Pussy

    "Subtlety is lost on the dim witted. That's you DUMBSHIT! I mean, Bovine!"

    END QUOTE

    Thank that much of yourself do ya? I find that a lot in you little snoty nosed, dried up weener faggots. Um, let me break it to ya, you aint shit.

    "Olbermann never has anyone on his show with a contrary opinion, no conservatives, no Republicans, no Republican candidates and that is OKAY with them."

    As I have noted on this site with some regularity, this is Olbermann's greatest transgression and the sine qua non of the diasaterous left wing fringe propaganda-fest, Meltdown.

    Olbermann knows that if he were ever to invite a conservative of even a middle of the road political commentator with a true concern for journalistic integrity, he would be taken to the woodshed. By avoiding dissenting opinion at all costs, Olbermann is allowed to foist irresponsible and lazily conceived commentary that is disconnected from the precepts of accurate and complete coverage of the questions raised. Olbermann never has to worry about being challenged, thus there is no need for him to use unbiased sources or to temper his grandiose bellowing worthy of Lyndon. LaRouche.

    Let me ask those of you who can't bring yourself to acknowledge the true depravity of Olbermann's nightly love fest with left fringe sychophants and like minded stooges this question: If you were GM of MSNBC and you could clean house top to bottom, would you keep Keith "Fox is worse than al Quaeda" Olbermann or would you replace him with somebody else?

    Countdown or the "evil" Fox News?
    Fox is the one viewers choose
    Because Keith's a buffoon
    A stark raving loon
    His colleagues greet him with "boos"

    Bloats Ben Franklin:

    "Wait!

    When did Fox News hire qualified reporters?"

    END QUOTE

    Um, I don;t know if you are considering these FNC contributors/editors:

    Ellen Ratner
    Eleanor Cliff
    Jaun Williams
    Marla Eliason
    Neil Gabler
    Mort Kondrake
    Susan Estrich
    Kirsten Powers
    Mary Ann Marsh
    Laura Schwartz
    Bob Beckel
    Jeff Cohen
    David Korn
    Mark Mellman
    Ellis Henican

    Liberal contributors all just to named a very damned scant few that all are allowed to voice their opinion on every single program on FNC.

    I tell ya what you dumb fuck, next time you want to open your mouth do us some good and plant your lips on Olby's anus so we don't have to hear your ignorance anymore.

    Posted by Hank:

    "As I have noted on this site with some regularity, this is Olbermann's greatest transgression and the sine qua non of the diasaterous left wing fringe propaganda-fest, Meltdown.

    Olbermann knows that if he were ever to invite a conservative of even a middle of the road political commentator with a true concern for journalistic integrity, he would be taken to the woodshed. By avoiding dissenting opinion at all costs, Olbermann is allowed to foist irresponsible and lazily conceived commentary that is disconnected from the precepts of accurate and complete coverage of the questions raised. Olbermann never has to worry about being challenged, thus there is no need for him to use unbiased sources or to temper his grandiose bellowing worthy of Lyndon. LaRouche.

    Let me ask those of you who can't bring yourself to acknowledge the true depravity of Olbermann's nightly love fest with left fringe sychophants and like minded stooges this question: If you were GM of MSNBC and you could clean house top to bottom, would you keep Keith "Fox is worse than al Quaeda" Olbermann or would you replace him with somebody else?"

    END QUOTE

    It's mopre than that Hank. Olby is a pussy. The man can not even carry on a conversation unless he is throwing flames. He has more convulsions and gag reflexes than Barney Frank pulling a gang bang train on 10 bull queers lined up in a row like a buffet.

    Olby is just another loud mouth fuck that if you walked up and slapped him he would fall into a fetal position and ball like the little pussy he really is. IS there no wonder people like AAP and clucker admire the man. They are just like him.

    You guys are hillarious! Keep up the comedy routine and Friday night will simply be the beginning of ratings to come. Thanks for all the help spreading the word on Countdown! The more folks you guys get to watch the fewer folks who answer:
    1) Saddam was respnsible for 9/11
    2) W.M.D. have been/will be found in Iraq.
    3) AQI and AQ are one and the same.
    4) AQ was in Iraq prior to March 2003
    5) Bill O'Reilly won a Peabody

    P.A.M.B.

    Hank- Newsbusters exposed the NBC and MSNBC plan to increase ratings by appealing to liberal America. NBC decided they were failing to convert Fox News viewers, so they decided to dumb down their product and pander to the fringe left. Tada- you get the new MSNBC. Its the anti-fox... ratings and all. Fox wins- MSNBC is on the other side of the spectrum.

    Vomits O'Lielly:

    "That is the most poorly done piece of Journalism that I have ever seen, OW is to be thanked for showing us where the bottom really lies."

    END QUOTE

    You should know because you are looking up all day and every day from where you slime about at the rest of us. You know, it really is the haves and the have nots. You, Mike Lussy, AAP, CLucker, SLOB are the have nots. People that are making it today studied harder and have a better work ethic than you turds. It gives me complete satisfaction to know you aint cuttin it in the world today.

    But, then again you are dead already.

    Bawah! Friday ratings?
    I pitty you poor third place hero and his fans-
    PAMMY- See you Wednesday when Monday's ratings come out.

    Fox doesn't have legit reporters plus Fox isn't a cable news network. It is a station with right wing propaganists who twist actual news to fit their agenda...just like Al-quaeda. They leave out important news that might hurt their party.
    Most of their "so-called" journalists are nothing more than right wing radio talk show hosts with no credentials.
    Had KO said those same words to CNN, I might have agree but since he attacked FNC , he lost no credibility with me.
    Plus, he has now taken over the key demo in ratings over Billo. We'll see if those comments will effect his ratings.

    Hurls Pamela:

    "You guys are hillarious! Keep up the comedy routine and Friday night will simply be the beginning of ratings to come. Thanks for all the help spreading the word on Countdown! The more folks you guys get to watch the fewer folks who answer:
    1) Saddam was respnsible for 9/11
    2) W.M.D. have been/will be found in Iraq.
    3) AQI and AQ are one and the same.
    4) AQ was in Iraq prior to March 2003
    5) Bill O'Reilly won a Peabody

    P.A.M.B."

    END QUOTE

    A southern gentelman shouldn't slap a woman but when she has a mouth to match her no. 2 sized washtub ass and/or a face that can be found on a can of Alpo I'll make an excpetion.

    1. We went to war with Iraq because they were in violation of UN resolution 1441 and because they were firing on our jets in the no-fly zone.

    2. If you can find me where any Bush official said Sadam was repsonsible for 911 please post it. Until then you are fucking stupid.

    3. WMD's. Well, lets just say it's a damned shame you weren't on some fact finding mission touring northern Iraq when Sadam gassed the Kurds therefore improving the gene pool here in the US with your elimination.

    4. I don't give a fuck if AQ was in Iraq before 911. Sadam was a threat to the region and world peace you stupid shit.

    5. It's dawgs like you that couldn't make it in the kitchen and can't find anyone to make it with in the bedroom that knows so much about the world. I'M DAMNED SURE YOU WILL BE HOME ON A FRIDAY NIGHT. It's a shame you weren't a first hand witenss when Sadam had entire familes bound and forced them to jump off or thrown one at a time off the roof of a 10 story building so that wives saw their husbands leap to their death or children saw their parents jumpt to their death and their only reliefe they would be forced to follow in the next few seconds. Youa re just a stupid bitch.

    I bet your ass is as wide as a no. 2 washtub. Tell us the truth. I bet I've seen better faces on a jar of iodine.

    Smatter 'Redneck' jerk, get tired of "Laura Bush", thought you'd move on from "Ted Nugent" too?

    I concur that "redneck" is more apt to your hateful persona, but unfrotunately, it also insults a lot of decent rednecks who wouldn't be caught dead associating with the likes of you.

    How in the HELL do you know who you're doing better than, and who your not? Do you REALLY believe most Americans are as pukishly SELFISH as you are and therefore choose their political beliefs based on personal wealth? If you do REALLY believe such tripe, then you are just as sad and selfish of a human being as your bombastic posts suggest.

    You forget that you've bored us many times with your personal job situation, and I can assure you that NOBODY on this board either envy's you, nor is anyone impressed with your incesstant bragging about your so called 'accomplishments....least of all me.

    Complete and total Jackass's like yourself only serve to confirm to me that I have the right outlook.

    see you here tomorrow Joe?
    one day is a ratings trend?
    pathetic!

    Post another chicken shit anonymous about to get rung up:

    ""Hell, what's more American than the KKK?"

    Fox News, apparently."

    END QUOTE

    Damn, I didn't know United States Senator, Robert Byrd, Democrat WV worked for Fox News.

    You are a dumb fuck.

    If Olbermann gets some numbers let him have em...but with all the free press, pimping, primping and injecting him into NFL game coverage who's surprised at the numbers boost.

    It's just hysterical to see the left create a hero out of a guy who is so transparent and void of any critical thinking and analysis.

    Olbermann has NEVER EVER had one guest on that would challenge his Media Matter talking points.

    Olbermann has the balls (or lack of) to throw stones at;
    Katie Couric
    Bill O'Reilly
    Sean Hannity
    Anderson Cooper

    but guess what... while all of the above were over in Iraq (Cooper is now) Olbermann sits at home wiping CRISCO off his MLB bobble head dolls.

    If people want to watch Olbermann thats great but don't for one second insult me with the "Olbermann is a journalist crap"!

    Whats so ironic is Oblbermann has been relentless in his Fox News attacks as a "front" for conservatives and the white house when in fact Olbermann himself is perhaps the biggest front in news history for an "Anchorman/Journalist". Ron Burgundy would be proud.

    redneck,

    >>2. If you can find me where any Bush official said Sadam was repsonsible for 911 please post it. Until then you are fucking stupid.

    Bush's own words, son:

    I have reluctantly concluded, along with other coalition leaders, that only the use of armed force will accomplish these objectives and restore international peace and security in the area. I have also determined that the use of armed force against Iraq is consistent with the United States and other countries continuing to take the necessary actions against international terrorists and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organiza-tions, or persons who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001. United States objectives also support a transition to democracy in Iraq, as contemplated by the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 (Public Law 105-338).

    1) - We went to war in Iraq because they were in violation of resolution 1441 and because they were firing on our jets in the no fly zone."....Thanks for admitting the president you admire so much is a liar! The official justifications were WMD and "mushroom clouds" and you damned well know it. Tell me again what UN's official position on our action? How the hell can you use a UN resolution as a justification for an attack that that very same UN officially opposed?

    2) - "If you can find me where any Bush official said Sadam was repsonsible for 911, please post it. Until then you are fucking stupid.".....I can find you 100's of statements by Bush officials IMPLYING Saddam was responsible. OH, but THAT'S different, you say! It remains that the majority of AMericans were misled into believing he played a part in 911. In fact, the majority STILL believed it as late as the 2004 election. I'm proud to say I was never one of them. "Fucking stupid" calling people "fucking stupid".....how amusing!

    3) - "WMDs.Well lets just say it's a shame you weren't on some fact finding mission when Sadam gassed the Kurds therefore improving the gene pool here in the US with your elimination.".....It's more of a shame that rubes like you always fail to mention that that particular piece of genocide occured about 15 years prior to our invasion, and most of the weapons inspectors no longer believed he had them.

    4) - "I don't give a damn if AQ was in Iraq before 911. Sadam was a threat to the region and world peace you stupid shit."....No YOU stupid shit, Saddam was ACTUALLY a stabilizing influence between AQ, whom he was no friend of, and the radical Shia, who were his ideological enemies as well as his subjects....and he and his army was far too weak to be a "threat to the region".

    And by the way caveman, it's SADDAM, not "Sadam"!


    blindrat- please read again. Bush does not say Iraq as responsible for 9/11.

    "Fox isn't a cable news network. It is a station with right wing propaganists who twist actual news to fit their agenda...just like Al-quaeda. . . Had KO said those same words to CNN, I might have agree but since he attacked FNC , he lost no credibility with me."

    Posted by: libjoe67 at September 11, 2007 12:29 PM

    OK, Joe if FOX is really a "station with right wing propaganists who twist actual news to fit their agenda" why would they allow so many liberal commentators on their program to express views contrary to conservatism ? (see post at 12:10 pm above) That doesn't sound like a very good strategy for " leav[ing] out important news that might hurt their party" which, according to you, is what FOX does.

    If FOX is such an evil entity that you believe Olbermann's comparisons to al Quaeda are OK, what do you think of MSNBC? If "twisting the news" and
    leav[ing] out important news that might hurt your party" are enough to be judged as contemptible as a terrorist organization, does MSNBC qualify in your book? Does the fact that Olbermann never allows dissenting opinion on his "news" show matter to you? Does the fact that Olbermann has breathed not a syllable about the criminal Hsu who who was one of Hillary's most prominent fundraisers concern you? Would that be an example of leav[ing] out important news that might hurt your party"? Just some questions to ponder.

    anonymouse(1:04),

    "I have also determined that the use of armed force against Iraq IS CONSISTANT with the United States and other countries continuing to take the necessary actions against international terrorists and terrorist organizations, INCLUDING those nations, organiza-tions, or persons who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001. "

    If it INCLUDES them, son, they must be responsible. If you interperate it another way, I'd LOVE to hear it...

    I love the idiots in here who hurl around "key demo" fox news is the anti christ, etc, etc.....Working in television suffice to say 80 perecent of you wouldnt know what the key demo is if it bit you all in the ass

    The Fox News stuff is comical, do all you liberal fools ever stop to ponder what is going to happen with Keeefys girl Hillary Clinton gets elected president? What is there going to be to talk about? Where will the scandals be supressed there, cause you know the scandals will come

    I love it, having worked in tv for 20 years, I love to read idiots in here talk about the Key Demo as if they know what it means.

    186kps wrote, brilliantly

    If Olbermann gets some numbers let him have em...but with all the free press, pimping, primping and injecting him into NFL game coverage who's surprised at the numbers boost.

    It's just hysterical to see the left create a hero out of a guy who is so transparent and void of any critical thinking and analysis.

    Olbermann has NEVER EVER had one guest on that would challenge his Media Matter talking points.

    Olbermann has the balls (or lack of) to throw stones at;
    Katie Couric
    Bill O'Reilly
    Sean Hannity
    Anderson Cooper

    but guess what... while all of the above were over in Iraq (Cooper is now) Olbermann sits at home wiping CRISCO off his MLB bobble head dolls.

    If people want to watch Olbermann thats great but don't for one second insult me with the "Olbermann is a journalist crap"!

    Whats so ironic is Oblbermann has been relentless in his Fox News attacks as a "front" for conservatives and the white house when in fact Olbermann himself is perhaps the biggest front in news history for an "Anchorman/Journalist". Ron Burgundy would be proud.

    This guy gets it, idiots Like Mike would never respond to a posting like this because they arent smart enough to, this summs it up perfectly

    As if we already didn't know that Odormann was viciously anti American.

    My, my. So detached from reality are Conservatives.....

    "Maybe, just maybe the idea of adding Keith Olbermann to the NFL on NBC roster is paying off for his MSNBC show. Countdown was the number one show in all of cable news Friday night, in the 25-54 demo (live+ same day DVR). Olbermann's Friday night win comes after his Thursday night appearance during halftime of the Saints-Colts game. An estimated 16.5 million viewers (18-49) watched the game.

    >More: an NBC insider adds the big story here is that this is the first time Olbermann has beaten O'Reilly, not a substitute host, in the key demo. The insider adds, "KO has been trending in that direction for weeks."

    Winning the 'key demo' means $$$$. You've been working in TV, what, getting my coffee for 20 years?

    "do all you liberal fools ever stop to ponder what is going to happen with Keeefys girl Hillary Clinton gets elected president? What is there going to be to talk about?"

    Who cares? We FINALLY will be rid of the chimp in the White House. Unfortunately, we'll be dealing with the national tragedy he has created for many, many years to come.


    What's so hard for Conservatives to understand about Fox pandering to their fears and prejudices in order to cement their loyalty to a specific political party? You're getting played for *suckers*. Note that I'm not calling you bigots, or homophobes, or religiously intolerant....I'm calling you *suckers*, because that's what you are.

    You know, as a Liberal, were I to move to a Red state and start my own church, and wrap myself in the flag, and put up a monument to the ten commandments on my lawn....half of you would automatically vote for me, even though I was scamming you. You know, like your current corrupt, perverted representatives in Congress did.


    What's so hard for Conservatives to understand about Fox pandering to their fears and prejudices in order to cement their loyalty to a specific political party? You're getting played for *suckers*. Note that I'm not calling you bigots, or homophobes, or religiously intolerant....I'm calling you *suckers*, because that's what you are.

    You know, as a Liberal, were I to move to a Red state and start my own church, and wrap myself in the flag, and put up a monument to the ten commandments on my lawn....half of you would automatically vote for me, even though I was scamming you. You know, like your current corrupt, perverted representatives in Congress did.

    And we don't HATE Bush, Fox or Conservatives. We keep trying to get you to wake the f&*(k up. The general liberal view of you folks has actually slid from disdain to pity over the last year or so.

    Pitiable suckers...good luck at the polls next November. You're going to need it.

    "this guy gets it (what guy?), idiots like Mike would never respond to a posting like this because they arent (sp) smart enough to, this summs (sp) it up perfectly."

    "Idiots" like Mike don't resond to posts like that because they read like they were written by a second grader.

    More people have seen Olberdouche call himself anti American on this site than who actually watched "Countdown to no ratings."

    And his ratings are up! Hurray for Keith! Give the conservobots and their jesus-weasels hell.

    Hope to see more of Keith...I know the rest of America is too.


    And...you know what? I think we've had just about enough of hearing that we're somehow 'unpatriotic' from the crowd that's looted the treasury thinking that greed is a Jesus-approved virtue, and then gotten us in to an intractable war that we didn't need to get in to in the first place.

    Oh, and FANTASTIC job your party did protecting the country on 9/11. Great work. Way to keep your eye on the ball.

    Thinking Bush is a moron, surrounded by kool-aid drinking ideologues isn't really that far out in left field. As a matter of fact, it's pretty much world-wide consensus at this point.

    Hey Blinddemocrat
    Maybe Bush listened to his CIA Director son

    The Tenet letter declassified CIA reporting on weapons of mass destruction and Iraq's links to al Qaeda. Two sentences on WMD garnered most media attention, but the intelligence chief's comments on al Qaeda deserved notice. "We have solid reporting of senior level contacts between Iraq and al Qa'ida going back a decade," Tenet wrote. "Credible information indicates that Iraq and al Qa'ida have discussed safe haven and reciprocal non-aggression. Since Operation Enduring Freedom [in Afghanistan], we have solid evidence of the presence in Iraq of al Qa'ida members, including some that have been in Baghdad. We have credible reporting that al Qa'ida leaders sought contacts in Iraq who could help them acquire WMD capabilities. The reporting also stated that Iraq has provided training to al Qa'ida members in the areas of poisons and gases and making conventional bombs." In sum, the letter said, "Iraq's increasing support to extremist Palestinians, coupled with

    growing indications of a relationship with al Qa'ida, suggest that Baghdad's links to terrorists will increase, even absent US military actions."

    The Factor, even vicious America haters like broadsword know what you said is the truth, problem is to them facts are to be ignored. It's how they feeeeeeeel that's important.

    WHAT THE GOVERNMENT HAS LEARNED SINCE THE WAR
    THE ADMINISTRATION'S CRITICS, including several of the Democratic presidential candidates, have alluded to new "evidence" they say confirms Iraq and al Qaeda had no relationship before the war. They have not shared that evidence.

    Even as the critics withhold the basis for their allegations, evidence on the other side is piling up. Ansar al-Islam--the al Qaeda cell formed in June 2001 that operated out of northern Iraq before the war, notably attacking Kurdish enemies of Saddam--has stepped up its activities elsewhere in the country. In some cases, say national security officials, Ansar is joining with remnants of Saddam's regime to attack Americans and nongovernmental organizations working in Iraq. There is some reporting, unconfirmed at this point, that the recent bombing of the U.N. headquarters was the result of a joint operation between Baathists and Ansar al-Islam.

    And there are reports of more direct links between the Iraqi regime and bin Laden. Farouk Hijazi, former Iraqi ambassador to Turkey and Saddam's longtime outreach agent to Islamic fundamentalists, has been captured. In his initial interrogations, Hijazi admitted meeting with senior al Qaeda leaders at Saddam's behest in 1994. According to administration officials familiar with his questioning, he has subsequently admitted additional contacts, including a meeting in late 1997. Hijazi continues to deny that he met with bin Laden on December 21, 1998, to offer the al Qaeda leader safe haven in Iraq. U.S. officials don't believe his denial.

    For one thing, the meeting was reported in the press at the time. It also fits a pattern of contacts surrounding Operation Desert Fox, the series of missile strikes the Clinton administration launched at Iraq beginning December 16, 1998. The bombing ended 70 hours later, on December 19, 1998. Administration officials now believe Hijazi left for Afghanistan as the bombing ended and met with bin Laden two days later.

    Earlier that year, at another point of increased tension between the United States and Iraq, Hussein sought to step up contacts with al Qaeda. On February 18, 1998, after the Iraqis repeatedly refused to permit U.N. weapons inspectors into sensitive sites, President Bill Clinton went to the Pentagon and delivered a hawkish speech about Hussein's weapons of mass destruction and his links to "an unholy axis of terrorists, drug traffickers, and organized international criminals." Said Clinton: "We have to defend our future from these predators of the 21st century. . . . They will be all the more lethal if we allow them to build arsenals of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them. We simply cannot allow that to happen. There is no more clear example of this threat than Saddam Hussein."

    The following day, February 19, 1998, according to documents unearthed in Baghdad after the recent war by journalists Mitch Potter and Inigo Gilmore, Hussein's intelligence service wrote a memo detailing upcoming meetings with a bin Laden representative traveling to Baghdad. Each reference to bin Laden had been covered with Liquid Paper. The memo laid out a plan to step up contacts between Iraq and al Qaeda. The Mukhabarat, one of Saddam's security forces, agreed to pay for "all the travel and hotel costs inside Iraq to gain the knowledge of the message from bin Laden and to convey to his envoy an oral message from us to bin Laden." The document set as the goal for the meeting a discussion of "the future of our relationship with him, bin Laden, and to achieve a direct meeting with him." The al Qaeda representative, the document went on to suggest, might be "a way to maintain contacts with bin Laden."


    Factor,

    Wow! "Discussed"? "Contacts"? Are you attempting to pretend idiocy, child? Yeah, Al Qaeda was seeking contacts; but, that doesn't mean that they were getting any. That is why the terrorist training camps were in the North part of Iraq where Saddam had no influence...

    Nice, impotent try, son...

    Liberal Weenie Mike Writes


    Who cares? We FINALLY will be rid of the chimp in the White House. Unfortunately, we'll be dealing with the national tragedy he has created for many, many years to come.

    the point is, what is your exaulted poohbah gonna do with liberal weenies like you in power? will he combat them the same way he combats AlQueda Fox and the Republican Party

    Assface pay attention the name of the site is Olbermann watch, not Liberal weenie who shit in our pants and run around crying woe is us watch

    Ha idiot

    "Idiots" like Mike don't resond to posts like that because they read like they were written by a second grader

    wow, made perfect sense to me, you are just too smart and too intelligent for the rest of us

    You remain, the turd monkey that you are

    "Who cares? We FINALLY will be rid of the chimp in the White House. Unfortunately, we'll be dealing with the national tragedy he has created for many, many years to come."

    you neolibs are already gearing up...the blame game is all you know.

    it's easier to place blame on someone else than accept responsibility.

    This guy is a scumbag. He never lived anywhere else that’s why he does not understand what’s out there.

    From former Soviet Union

    Nice, impotent try, son...

    Posted by: blindrat at September 11, 2007 1:52 PM

    Might want to read the last paragraph again son. I know it is hard. Try sounding out each word as you go.

    Want more proof son...

    WHAT THE ADMINISTRATION DIDN'T USE
    IF THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION had been out to hype the threat from an al Qaeda-Saddam link, it stands to reason that it would have used every shred of incriminating evidence at its disposal. Instead, the administration was restrained in its use of available intelligence. What the Bush administration left out is in some ways as revealing as what it included.

    * Iraqi defectors had been saying for years that Saddam's regime trained "non-Iraqi Arab terrorists" at a camp in Salman Pak, south of Baghdad. U.N. inspectors had confirmed the camp's existence, including the presence of a Boeing 707. Defectors say the plane was used to train hijackers; the Iraqi regime said it was used in counterterrorism training. Sabah Khodada, a captain in the Iraqi Army, worked at Salman Pak. In October 2001, he told PBS's "Frontline" about what went on there. "Training is majorly on terrorism. They would be trained on assassinations, kidnapping, hijacking of airplanes, hijacking of buses, public buses, hijacking of trains and all other kinds of operations related to terrorism. . . . All this training is directly toward attacking American targets, and American interests."

    But the Bush administration said little about Salman Pak as it demonstrated links between Iraq and al Qaeda. According to administration sources, some detainees who provided credible evidence of other links between Iraq and al Qaeda, including training in terrorism and WMD, insist they have no knowledge of Salman Pak. Khodada, the Iraqi army captain, also professed ignorance of whether the trainees were members of al Qaeda. "Nobody came and told us, 'This is al Qaeda people,'" he explained, "but I know there were some Saudis, there were some Afghanis. There were some other people from other countries getting trained."

    * On February 13, 2003, the government of the Philippines asked Hisham al Hussein, the second secretary of the Iraqi embassy in Manila, to leave the country. According to telephone records obtained by Philippine intelligence, Hussein had been in frequent contact with two leaders of Abu Sayyaf, an al Qaeda affiliate in South Asia, immediately before and immediately after they detonated a bomb in Zamboanga City. That attack killed two Filipinos and an American Special Forces soldier and injured several others. Hussein left the Philippines for Iraq after he was "PNG'd"--declared persona non grata--by the Philippine government and has not been heard from since.

    According to a report in the Christian Science Monitor, an Abu Sayyaf leader who planned the attack bragged on television a month after the bombing that Iraq had contacted him about conducting joint operations. Philippine intelligence officials were initially skeptical of his boasting, but after finding the telephone records they believed him.

    * No fewer than five high-ranking Czech officials have publicly confirmed that Mohammed Atta, the lead September 11 hijacker, met with Ahmed Khalil Ibrahim al-Ani, an Iraqi intelligence officer working at the Iraqi embassy, in Prague five months before the hijacking. Media leaks here and in the Czech Republic have called into question whether Atta was in Prague on the key dates--between April 4 and April 11, 2001. And several high-ranking administration officials are "agnostic" as to whether the meeting took place. Still, the public position of the Czech government to this day is that it did.

    That assertion should be seen in the context of Atta's curious stop-off in Prague the previous spring, as he traveled to the United States. Atta flew to Prague from Germany on May 30, 2000, but did not have a valid visa and was denied entry. He returned to Germany, obtained the proper paperwork, and took a bus back to Prague. One day later, he left for the United States.

    Despite the Czech government's confirmation of the Atta-al Ani meeting, the Bush administration dropped it as evidence of an al Qaeda-Iraq connection in September 2002. Far from hyping this episode, administration officials refrained from citing it as the debate over the Iraq war heated up in Congress, in the country, and at the U.N.

    Thanks, Factor!

    "Might be a way to maintain contacts with Bin Laden" Wow! Excellent piece of nothing from 2003!

    Factor, it doesn't matter how many facts you put in front of blindbat. He discounts everything, except Olbermahn and he will defend the enemy till the end.

    Have you real Americans done your job AS an American today?

    Have you sent a copy of the above youtube clip to MSNBC @ NEWS HOLE, NBC, AND MSNBC CONTACTS today and voiced your opinion on this unacceptable anti-American behavior by one of their employees?

    Or are you content to just jack off here for the fun of it?

    While banter for the sake of entertainment is the jest of the day certain actions such as Olbermanns comments rise to a whole nother level.............this is one of those instances.

    You ain't gotta pair if you don't voice your opinion where it REALLY counts.

    Broadsword says:

    "What's so hard for Conservatives to understand about Fox pandering to their fears and prejudices in order to cement their loyalty to a specific political party?"

    Unfortuneately for you broadsword, you simply aren't telling the truth. A network that airs opinions of conservatives and liberals alike is not "pandering to the fears and prejudices" of its audience. A list of liberal FOX commentators was posted above. Here it is again for your edification:

    Ellen Ratner
    Eleanor Cliff
    Jaun Williams
    Marla Eliason
    Neil Gabler
    Mort Kondrake
    Susan Estrich
    Kirsten Powers
    Mary Ann Marsh
    Laura Schwartz
    Bob Beckel
    Jeff Cohen
    David Korn
    Mark Mellman
    Ellis Henican

    Now, broadsword, a better use of your time would be to defend MSNBC. Talk about pandering to an audience's prejudices! Who can you name on MSNBC that offers conservative opinion? Anbody? How many conservative commentators have appeared on Olbermann to challenge his left fringe propraganda?

    If you want your accusations of bias by a network to be taken seriously broadsword, pick a target that is truly sold out to a political movement-- that would be MSNBC and it's genuflection to the far left.


    Hank, you think that Morton Kondrake, who has never, not once, disagreed with the administration in public....is some kind of liberal?

    Your characterization of Fox as some kind of Balanced source is *hilarious*...I wonder how many times any of the people on your list have appeared on Faux News with less than two Conservative pannelists and, oh say, Sean Hannity.

    See, what Fox does is stack the deck in favor of Conservatives, repeat without criticism Whitehouse talking points, and....oh, that's right...they're giant cheerleaders for unending war! Sooooooo balanced.

    Well to be fair, pat buchanan represents the cons voice on MSNBC, if im not mistaken he's the only one, and i think hes shown up on Olbermann once

    Oh, and to be clear; the difference between a liberal like me, and your average Faux News viewer, is that I get my information from something like 20 sources every day.

    I don't watch Fox exclusively, and then parrot everything I hear from them, Malkin, Krauthammer, Taronto, Gigot, and the rest of your gang of cheerleaders for everything that's wrong with the world.

    I read the fascist Opinionjournal.com religiously, to see what your craziest ideologues are up to, but also International Herald Tribune, the Christian Science Monitor, Foreign Policy Magazine, three or four live bloggers covering your latest conservative corruption trials or breaking pederast stories, The Financial Times, Le Monde, The Nation, occasionally lurk on Free Republic (to see what your criminally insane element is up to). The list goes on.

    Fareed Zacharia's show (Foreign Exchange) is something the whole country should be required to watch at dinner. Non-biased, dispassionate, and it covers actual news with actual experts....not professional pundits.

    For a laugh, I watch 'world's worst person' on MSNBC, which....I hate to brake this to you, actually features really, really bad people.

    "...really, really bad people"?

    I think we have officially found the second grader among us.

    For a laugh, I watch 'world's worst person' on MSNBC, which....I hate to brake this to you, actually features really, really bad people.

    Of which none are ever Dem O Crats,

    Let me help you out, son: Here is what Frontline says about Salman Pak...

    [Editor's Note, November 2005: More than two years after the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, there has been no verification of Khodada's account of the activities at Salman Pak. In fact, U.S. officials have now concluded that Salman Pak was most likely used to train Iraqi counter-terrorism units in anti-hijacking techniques. It should also be noted that he and other defectors interviewed for this report were brought to FRONTLINE's attention by the Iraqi National Congress (INC), a dissident organization that was working to overthrow Saddam Hussein. Since the original broadcast, Khodada has not publicly addressed questions that have been raised about his account of activities at Salman Pak.]

    http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/gunning/interviews/khodada.html

    Tough Guy Bill O Lielly writes


    Here is to hoping that all you dumb fucking neocon war suporters have all your family members that are in the military treated the same way that the soldiers treated Pat Tillman when they had him directly in their sights.

    You are a tough, tough guy, if there were more tough guy liberals like you you wouldnt have the mark of all liberals being weenies that you have now

    From now on you are forever known as Bizzaro Bill O Lielly, much like Superman had Bizarro Superman, you are the violence loving liberal

    Doofus, ha

    I love how the Olbyloons just change the subject when Olbermann says something so stupid and so out-of-this world that even THEY can't defend it. So they just change the subject and move on. Incredible to watch but always reliable.

    Factor,

    Let me help you with the Czech story, son:

    "...But now US investigators have said that there is not even evidence to show that Atta had been in Prague at the time of the alleged meeting..."

    "...According to a Newsweek report, the Czechs acknowledged several months ago that they may have been mistaken about the whole affair.

    "Neither we nor the Czechs nor anybody else has any information he was coming or going [to Prague] at that time," said a US official quoted by Newsweek.

    Atta is known to have been in Prague in June 2000, but investigations indicate that at the time of the alleged meeting with the Iraqi agent, Ahmed Chalil Ibrahim Samir Ani, in April 2001, he was in Virginia Beach and Florida... "

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/1961668.stm

    Here's a tip, boy: Use more recent sources...

    Factor @ 2:06: "Ansar al-islam, the Al Qeada cell formed in June 2001, that operated out of Northern Iraq before the war."

    Most notable about Ansar al-islam are the facts that non-factor chose to omit about them: 1) - They did not become a part of Al Qeada and the insurgency until well AFTER the invasion. 2) - They were operating in the NORTHERN mountains of Iraq, where Saddam had no autonomy or control.

    The TRUTH is that, if we had chosen to, we could have taken them out without even invading Iraq.

    This may not be Factor's fault though....I'm pretty sure that O'Reilly, Limbaugh, and Hannity are probably conveniently leaving these facts out of all of THEIR diatribes as well.

    "Hank, you think that Morton Kondrake, who has never, not once, disagreed with the administration in public....is some kind of liberal?"

    Well, he's certainly not a conservative which you undoubtedly already knew because of his credentials such as:

    "joined the staff of the Chicago Sun-Times moving to the paper's Washington bureau in 1968, eventually working his way up to White House correspondent . . . His influence landed him on the master list of Nixon political opponents. . .left the Sun-Times to become executive editor of The New Republic. . . worked there until he left to become Washington Bureau Chief for Newsweek magazine. In the meantime, his increased profile led to commentary positions at National Public Radio.

    Let's see . . . Nixon enemies list, editor of New Republic, commentator for NPR, yeah, a real right winger.

    "Your characterization of Fox as some kind of Balanced source is *hilarious*..."

    I never said that. I am honest enough to say that I think it leans to the right, but viewpoints of liberals get an airing as well.

    And of course, I see you didn't bother to take up my challenge to defend MSNBC and Olbermann.

    You obviously didn't read the title of the article or the bottom of the article son. Remember, sound the words out.
    Great Thanks.

    Brandon: "I love it how the Olbyloons just change the subject when Olbermann says something so stupid and out of this world"....

    Yes, amazing isn't it? But we also change the subject pretty quickly every time YOU say something stupid and out of this world, which occurs at least once per day.

    Oh, it's so funny when Conservatives still parrot Cheney on the Czchek thing, despite the fact the he's been a) shown to be a total liar on the subject and b) he's been shown to be a total liar on the subject:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RytxVNM0llQ

    Watch him say he never said it, and then watch him actually having said it.

    Doesn't stuff like this ring a bell with you morons?

    And of course, I see you didn't bother to take up my challenge to defend MSNBC and Olbermann.

    Posted by: hank at September 11, 2007 3:13 PM

    They never do. You can't defend the indefensible.

    Turd writes

    Brandon: "I love it how the Olbyloons just change the subject when Olbermann says something so stupid and out of this world"....

    Yes, amazing isn't it? But we also change the subject pretty quickly every time YOU say something stupid and out of this world, which occurs at least once per day.

    This is why u are a turd, u pick silly fights and cry foul when people such as I call you out on your stupidity

    Where is it written you needed to respond to this? Idiot god, please stop giving me a reason to call you what you are

    Turd

    Factor,

    I accept your surrender, son...

    If you had something besides the four year old "article", you'd have given it...

    I've refuted everything you'd pretended to provide with real links to real sources. You've provided nothing, child, but unnamed sources and speculation...

    Hank, if you don't like what you see on MSNBC (probably because it makes you question your convenient and comfortable delusions about our current situation), then I would suggest something to you:

    Your television has at least two knobs or dials on it. One lowers the volume, and the other one CHANGES THE CHANNEL.

    Indefensible? You've got to be kidding; this war is a travesty, this adminstration is a contemptible joke, and we're in a real pickle right now as a country.

    Your solution? Ban the Mexicans! Keep fags from getting married! Put the ten commandments in all the courtrooms! Strip the Constitution of Habeas Corpus protections! Secret renditions to secret prisons! YEAH!!!! USA! USA! USA!

    Not to divert this mind numbing debate BUT...

    Countless people have wondered aloud what Mike's opinion is of the MoveOn.org and Olberman's slander of the general yesterday. Warranted?

    General Petraeus is putting lipstick on a pig.

    I would remind the conservatives here that this isn't the first time the Administration has trotted out a General with UNIMPEACHABLE credentials and a long history of service to the country....to lie us in to more war.

    Nobody respects your twisted opinion asshole- he asked Mike.

    I've refuted everything you'd pretended to provide with real links to real sources. You've provided nothing, child, but unnamed sources and speculation...

    Posted by: blindrat at September 11, 2007 3:22 PM

    HAAA! Another liberal claiming "Mission Accomplished". You were to prove that Bush knowingly misleads the country into thinking Saddam was planning something with al Qaeda. You have proved nothing. I have proved you wrong. Great Thanks.

    If it makes you feel better, Factor, think that all you want...

    It doesn't change the truth, but it maintains your perception of the truth, son...

    It's lipstick on a pig, you sad little person.

    And....you're buying it. This, despite having been lied to, right to your face by this administration, for years.

    There are quite a few people who respect my opinion. And I'm not going to take your bait and call you an asshole, though it is richly deserved.

    With all due respect... GO FUCK YOURSELF...

    Keith Olbermann's more of a fucking man, than you'll ever fucking be... at least we know who HE is, more than we can say for you panzy ass...

    bitch...

    -Me

    You go Chuck!

    Mike?

    "Hank, if you don't like what you see on MSNBC then I would suggest something to you: Your television has at least two knobs or dials on it. One lowers the volume, and the other one CHANGES THE CHANNEL."

    The issue isn't whether I like MSNBC or not. The issue is that you claimed that FOX
    "panders to the fears and prejudices" of its audience "in order to cement their loyalty to a specific political party".

    This is simply left wing blather. If pandering and cementing loyalty to a political party are the objectives of FOX they are doing a poor job of it by permitting libs to air their point of view and challenge conservatives.

    The real issue, broadsword is that MSNBC is the WORST offender in terms of blatant partisanship for one point of view (liberal). Yet this doesn't matter to you as long as they are playing your tune. You don't care about Olbermann's lack of journalistic intergrity and his claims that he is "not political" all the while serving as a mouth piece for the far left fringe. Meltdown is a haven for lefty sycophants where no conservative opinion is allowed.

    If "pandering" is what you object to broadsword, then let's hear something about MSNBC from you.

    I suggest the Keith Krazies change the channel from Fox if they don't like what they see on it, problem is, most pass judgment on it without ever actually watching it!


    Hank,

    Sure; let's stipulate that *both* multinational media conglomerates are playing the divisive game to....well, to get more ratings, and therefore more money.

    I think that what steams you Conservatives is that FOX is equally as guilty of this as MSNBC, but you're coming to realize that there's a great and, of late, largely ignored market for Progressives in this Country.

    Particularly given the policy performance of the Conservative ideology in actual practice.

    MSNBC is just tapping in to that. And, if you're saying that Olberman's reports aren't truthful, let's see *you* prove that. See, the onus isn't on me to make your case.

    Benson, to answer your question, I watched most of Countdown yesterday and I didn't see or hear anything on that show I would call 'slander'.

    That said, I saw reference to the NYT ad by moveon you are referring too, not on Countdown, but on Hardball, and I agree with John Kerry's opinion that the ad was, in fact, over the top.

    Benson, I consider you more reasonable that many on this board, but you have got to understand that it has become very difficult for those on either side to draw that line between questioning one's judgement, and questioning one's patriotism. BOTH sides are doing it!

    I blame Bush for unnecessarily placing America in this regretable situation that isn't going away any time soon. The hardest thing for me to understand is why so many on your side still defend him with so much venom.....He let us ALL down!

    Benson, this is what I posted last night, nothin' but crickets.....

    Factor, I posted all of wes clarks blunders and mikey read me the riot act. "How dare I "smear" a decorated war hero," said he. I posted facts, nothing but. He came unglued, to say the least. Lets see how he treats olby's latest embarrassment.

    Posted by: royal king at September 11, 2007 12:36 AM

    The truth is that Keith Olbermann is an intellectually flaccid and incurious human being who once was smart and funny about sports but who has turned himself into a phony pumped-up bore with these silly and clownish and immature posturings which the hard left takes seriously in their blind hatred of Bush.

    What's all the shouting about?

    It's not like Olbyloon was defending the Nazis, or blaming our troops, like our venerable self-proclaimed Peabody Award-winning O'Reilly has done several times already.

    Gawd, if only Olby could throw more fiction like that up there, he'd certainly nail more of the NASCAR/American Idol/FNC idiots and maybe a few amoeba.

    Keep writing, broadsword.
    That's some of the most lucid writing I've seen on this site yet.

    "See, the onus isn't on me to make your case"

    No it's not, I've already made my case. FOX presents liberal opinion to give all sides a chance to air their views.

    You are wrong to try to draw equivalency between FOX and MSNBC in an effort to avoid having to defend MSNBC. I have repeatedly challenged you to show that MSNBC has commentators that offer conservative opinion. MSNBC is completely sold out to left fringe politics. Olbermann is the worst because he claims to have a "news" show and claims not to be political when he simply spouts DNC talking points every night.

    "And, if you're saying that Olberman's reports aren't truthful, let's see *you* prove that."

    Broadsword, you been coming to this site long enough to know better than to issue a challenge like that.

    Start here:

    http://www.olbermannwatch.com/archives/2006/12/

    "FOX presents liberal opinion..."


    HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!HAHA!

    Yeah, if you think slightly right of center as liberal.
    Thank you, Stalin.

    Fox does indeed present liberal opinion, becuase they say so.

    So when Chris Dodd was on O'Reilly recently he was presenting the GOP talking points? On his many, many appearances on Fox News prior to declaring Jihad on them, John Edwards was praising the Bush White House? When John Kerry appears on Fox whose agenda is he promoting? Rush Limbaugh's?

    It's not like Olbyloon was defending the Nazis, or blaming our troops, like our venerable self-proclaimed Peabody Award-winning O'Reilly has done several times already.

    Posted by: Green Shirt at September 11, 2007 4:19 PM

    Problem is Green Shirt O'Reilly never defended Nazis. Too bad you simply get spoon fed by Olby into believing crap like this.

    I love you little childish libs who are just now entering the political debate. Do any of you remember that news show from CNN called "BOTH SIDES WITH JESSE JACKSON". Remeber how CNN admited to giving Sadam positive coverage so they could stay. One of you dumbshits actually suggested that Chris Matthews was proof of conservative bias, and the idiot did not even know he worked for Tip O'neal. We have the NYT getting fired for lying in his articles, we have Reuters and AP publishing photographs that were doctored to satisfy all you closet jew haters, and list keeps getting bigger. There is not enough space.

    I followed politics before Faux news was even on the air. Now the rest of you non-binding American liberals go get you new talking points from you political ally Osama.

    I pray for a civil war in this country.

    MIKE- Exactly why I don't consider you a loon...

    I actually don't expect you to defend everything KeithO spews, but when he goes over the top... its important to see where you stand.

    As for the Bush bashing that is endured everyday... I defend Bush on many points but disagree with him on others. Yet, because I despise Keith so much, I become a Bush apologist. I understand it makes the flow of thoughts on this blog a lot easier if we are all lumped on one side or the other. Its the way it is. Its also why you are unfortunately a lightning rod for so much slander. Can't take it personal, especially when it is misguided.

    Indeed Fox Does present Liberal Opinion all the time, I submit none of you bother to watch because you are all lock step with the democratic talking points lead by that raging former idiot governer (sp) of Vermont

    In any hour of O Reily there are always voices who disagree with him

    I await the one voice on Olbermann who disagrees with him

    Get one thing straight NEITHER ONE ARE NEWSMEN, THEY ARE TALKING HEADS PERIOD

    Hank, you get it, it serves little purpose to try to persuade those who do not see, because as someone wrote up here earlier this site has degenerated into a draw sides your side sucks no your side sucks arena

    hank,

    You hurt Tucker and Joe's feelings.

    They told me to tell you they're just two of the MSNBC commentators that offer conservative opinion. They also told me to ask you to wash the shit out of your ears and start doing some homework, because it's embarrassing to read what seems to qualify as a debate from your end.

    "Benson, to answer your question, I watched most of Countdown yesterday and I didn't see or hear anything on that show I would call 'slander'."

    posted by mike


    I'm downright shocked! Not.

    The real reason for MSNBC spikes.
    Thank God Norah ODonnel's is back...
    At least she can disguise her liberal slant behind smug grins and winks!

    Jeff: "I'm downright shoked! Not.".....Bet YOU didn't even watch the show!

    Joe Scarbourough is not a conservative
    and neither is Tucker Carlson

    nice try

    "BOTH sides are doing it!"

    "I blame Bush"

    Posted by: Mike at September 11, 2007 4:15 PM

    Huh?

    "Joe Scarborough is not a conservative
    and neither is Tucker Carlson."

    Why?

    Sorry Roger- I disagree...
    Tucker is one of my favorite right wing pundits...
    Minus the bow tie and high-pitch "Come On" screams.

    Actually, that "with us or against us" quote is from George Orwell, not George Bush. Here it is:

    "Pacifism. Pacifism is objectively pro-Fascist. This is elementary common sense. If you hamper the war effort of one side you automatically help that of the other. Nor is there any real way of remaining outside such a war as the present one. In practice, �he that is not with me is against me�. The idea that you can somehow remain aloof from and superior to the struggle, while living on food which British sailors have to risk their lives to bring you, is a bourgeois illusion bred of money and security. Mr Savage remarks that �according to this type of reasoning, a German or Japanese pacifist would be �objectively pro-British�.� But of course he would be! That is why pacifist activities are not permitted in those countries (in both of them the penalty is, or can be, beheading) while both the Germans and the Japanese do all they can to encourage the spread of pacifism in British and American territories. The Germans even run a spurious �freedom� station which serves out pacifist propaganda indistinguishable from that of the P.P.U. They would stimulate pacifism in Russia as well if they could, but in that case they have tougher babies to deal with. In so far as it takes effect at all, pacifist propaganda can only be effective against those countries where a certain amount of freedom of speech is still permitted; in other words it is helpful to totalitarianism."

    "Jeff": "Both sides are doing it"....I'm not surprised that YOU didn't get this comment, but let me explain it - just for you: Every time you call someone else "un-American, traitor, enemy defender, etc.", because you don't like their views.....you are doing it.

    "I blame Bush"....There was a lot more to this comment, now wasn't there Jeffy?

    "huh"....Exactly what I'd expect from YOU!

    .".....Bet YOU didn't even watch the show!

    Posted by: Mike at September 11, 2007 4:43 PM


    Johnny watches for me. Besides, why would I want to give him a viewer? I leave my tv on Fox (#1) while I'm outside taking care of my animals giving O'Reilly and Hannity a live viewer every night. I'm usually in by 8 to catch the re-runs of both. You know, real news.

    "huh"....Exactly what I'd expect from YOU!

    Posted by: Mike at September 11, 2007 4:55 PM


    You mean like your "peep" comment? Likewise, just what I would expect from you. By the way, "peep" is the most intelligent post to date for you. Congrats.

    Jeff: "Johnny watches for me."....Just what I thought.

    Now, would you accept at face value a review that either myself or Keith Olbermann did on Michael Savage's show?

    Of course you wouldn't!

    But that is EXACTLY what you are doing when you accept Johnny's 'recaps' at face value in place of actually seeing the show.

    ClassicCon, where to begin.

    So, I'm Jewish, and a liberal. That makes me a Jew hater? Hmmmm. That's puzzling.

    Tell us all about all of your Jewish friends.

    I'm sure there's dozens.

    You think we Liberals are Bin Laden's political allies, because Bin Laden says so?

    GET. THIS. STRAIGHT.

    YOU Conservatives are giving the terrorists everything they want. They wanted the US in Iraq, and you gave them that. They say that Noam Chomsky is their favorite American, and you buy it.

    Never mind that it divides the country, you're going to take that assertion that Progressive Americans are somehow akin to a Saudi religious fundamentalist, and make it your justification for, again, dividing the nation. How'd you put it? "I pray for a civil war in this country".

    So, the terrorist wants us divided against each other, and you're only too happy to oblige.

    Again, giving *terrorists* exactly what they want.

    I would remind you that you'd be hard pressed to find ONE single progressive liberal in this country that is either a) a religious fundamentalist b) thinks faith should be the key determinant in governance or c) would be happy about a dictatorship coupled with martial law.

    I wish I could say the same thing about your side.

    Or, am I off the mark?

    "peep"....?????

    "By the way "peep" is the most intelligent post to date from you. Congrats."

    If a moron like YOU ever begins to think my posts are 'intelligent', then I will know that I am rapidly loosing brain cells.

    Now, would you accept at face value a review that either myself or Keith Olbermann did on Michael Savage's show?

    Of course you wouldn't!

    But that is EXACTLY what you are doing when you accept Johnny's 'recaps' at face value in place of actually seeing the show.

    Posted by: Mike at September 11, 2007 5:02 PM


    Overbite has a long history of lying and fabricating, as Johnny has
    proven time and time again with proof. So, no. I wouldn't trust Overbite. Have you or anyone ever proven Johnny to be a liar or fabricator? Not that I have seen. Hence, I trust him. Please, don't bring up the whole "blink" crap, again. You lost that one at least twice. Come up with a real lie with proof.

    I contend Pat Buchanan is the only true conservative voice on MSNBC

    I'm well aware Joe S rode into office in 1994 riding Newt Gingrich

    And I'm well aware Joe S has taken his fair share of knocks at the president who lets face it deserves it

    The Joe S of 1994 and the Joe S of 2007 are two different people

    But Tucker C and Joe are MSNBC conservatives, guys who are lock step against Bush, which is Fine. I think Carlson now is a Libertarian.

    Ask yourselves this, would A Ronald Reagan running today (for 2008) be supported by either of these individuals?

    I say no

    Would a Pat Buchanan support Ronald Reagan today? Indeed he would

    BTW I also believe Bush isnt a conservative, thanks to all the big goverment and oversees intervention

    Hey guys just something I believe, Im probably alot older than people posting here so I'm sure Ill get hammered, just my thoughts

    Thanks

    Seriously, is that supposed be some kind of earth shattering video? What exactly am I missing?

    You should have used the time it took you to splice that video together getting those rose colored glasses removed from your thick skull.

    Nice try though.

    People:

    Reagan is dead. Get over it.

    FOX News is a GOP opinion organ.

    Bush isn't conservative, because once a conservative does something wrong, he is no longer a conservative.

    and of course when a Democratic gets caught doing something wrong it doesn't really happen just so long as Olbyloon doesn't report on it.

    "You hurt Tucker and Joe's feelings. They told me to tell you they're just two of the MSNBC commentators that offer conservative opinion"

    Not anymore. Joe flipped when Danny Boy took over as GM and has followed his marching orders. Here's some of "conservative" Joe's "hard hitting" interview with Hillary Clinton in May, 2007:

    SCARBOROUGH: Senator, I think that you just blew your opponents away in the last debate. . . And one of the issues, obviously, that’s come up is Iraq, but another issue that a lot of people are talking about has to do with health care. And, obviously, you were on the forefront of that back in 1993. How big do you think that issue’s going to play in the 2008 election? . . .


    CLINTON: You know, Joe, one of the things that I’ve worked on for a long time is how we, number one, figure out what we’re supposed to do to treat kids. Because, you know, kids are not just miniature adults, you know.
    You might have seen a big story recently about, you know, drug companies pushing all these drugs onto kids.

    SCARBOROUGH: Right
    .
    CLINTON: And we don’t do adequate testing.

    SCARBOROUGH: You talk about new frontiers. Obviously, you, running as a female for the presidency, it scares a lot of people.
    (LAUGHTER)
    Me, I’m hip to it. I’m open-minded, as you know. I’m a uniter not a divider.
    (LAUGHTER)
    Yesterday, we had Joe Klein on, who said he thought you were doing very well; had a great performance in the debate; said you’ve done a remarkable job as a senator.
    And he pointed to the fact that you’ve had the same hairstyle now for six years...
    (LAUGHTER)
    ... which means that you’re comfortable, finally, in your own skin.

    CLINTON: But I’m having a great time. This is a fabulous campaign. But I really think that it’s in large measure because people are so anxious to turn the page, you know?

    SCARBOROUGH: Right. . .

    SCARBOROUGH: Well, we’re very excited to have you here. And, again, that has to do with keeping your head down and working hard and being a very unifying force. And we thank you for being with us. And I apologize for anything that I’ve ever said that may have been unkind about you or the president, and wasn’t really serious about that whole impeachment thing. It was really guys who recommended that I do that.

    Jamey got a gun wrote.....

    Bush isn't conservative, because once a conservative does something wrong, he is no longer a conservative.

    No son, either you are, or you aren't
    Bush ran as one thing
    and became another

    Gigantic Spending, War, Blatantly crappy boarder protection are not benchmarks of a conservative

    His presidency was hijacked very early on and he allowed it to happen

    Jeff: "Have you or anyone ever proven Johnny to be a liar or fabricator?"....Now you're trying to get me to insult Johnny publicly aren't you Jeff? I think we've been there and done that.

    - "Please don't bring up the "blink" crap again. You lost that one twice."....No Jeff, I WON that one "TWICE". I'll win it every time it comes up because the FACTS were on my side, and they still are. "Blink" was just an example....I've seen other similar examples and I have posted a couple of them. Johnny interprets all the time.....and ALWAYS negatively. It's his 'job'!

    That said Jeff...the REAL point is that an ultra right winger who hates Keith Olbermann cannot be relied on to do a fair 'recap' any more than you could depend on someone like me or Kieth to do a fair 'recap' of a Michael Savage show.

    The truth is Jeff that you know very little about Keith Olbermann...because 99% of what you think you know came from this attack website.

    TVnewser actually posted a link to your site...whoa

    Roger Ailes: "His presidency was hijacked early on and he allowed it to happen."

    Then why doesn't your namesake's 'News' organization call a spade a spade and end it's rather sickening lovefest with this man?

    Senator John Warner: "Do you feel that [Iraq war] is making America safer"?

    General Petraeus: (pause) "I believe this is indeed the best course of action to achieve our objectives in Iraq."

    Warner: "Does the [Iraq war] make America safer?"

    Petraeus replied, "I don't know, actually. I have not sat down and sorted in my own mind."


    I guess a paycheck's just a paycheck to some fellas.


    Jeff: "Have you or anyone ever proven Johnny to be a liar or fabricator?"....Now you're trying to get me to insult Johnny publicly aren't you Jeff? I think we've been there and done that.


    posted by mike

    Wrong, mike. It was a simple question in which you avoided. You could prove him to be a liar or fabricator w/out personally insulting him. Since you can't do the former, I rest my case.

    Jeff ole buddy, you just don't want to remember "blink" do you?

    I avoided nothing. I SAID "Johnny interprets all the time". What in the hell do you think the word "Interprets" means?

    The FACT remains that you CANNOT simply read Johnny's incredible biased 'recaps' and know anything about Countdown any more than you can rely strictly on Fox 'News' and actually understand current events.

    Then why doesn't your namesake's 'News' organization call a spade a spade and end it's rather sickening lovefest with this man?


    Again my friend, as Ive submitted on numerous occasions today, there are about 15 times more liberal pundits who appear on FOX than Cons who appear on MSNBC

    I submit , and Ill take you on your word, you dont watch fox news, and for that i say thats your perogative, as someone who worked there for several years since the inception before I left, I happen to know the Liberal voice is heard on Fox

    I submit you dont watch Fox only because Olbermann tells you its evil.......Ohhhh

    You submit to me where the sickening lovefest is, You tell me where on Fox is a Bush Lovefest

    There is no difference, you watch what you want to watch and hammer the other side and the world goes round and round

    DUMBSHIT! I mean Bovine!

    WTF does this mean?
    This is your "spiel" that makes you original

    What does this mean? Who cares? this is about as original as the guy who always posts George Mcgovern quotes about the Vietnamese belonging in Vietnam

    Jeff: "Have you or anyone ever proven Johnny to be a liar or fabricator?"....Now you're trying to get me to insult Johnny publicly aren't you Jeff? I think we've been there and done that.


    posted by mike

    Wrong, mike. It was a simple question in which you avoided. You could prove him to be a liar or fabricator w/out personally insulting him. Since you can't do the former, I rest my case.

    Posted by: royal king at September 11, 2007 5:55 PM


    I avoided nothing. I SAID "Johnny interprets all the time". What in the hell do you think the word "Interprets" means?

    The FACT remains that you CANNOT simply read Johnny's incredible biased 'recaps' and know anything about Countdown any more than you can rely strictly on Fox 'News' and actually understand current events.

    Posted by: Mike at September 11, 2007 6:05 PM

    Roger: "you tell me where on Fox is a Bush lovefest?".....Every night and on every show.

    "there are about 15 times as many liberal pundits who appear on Fox than Cons who appear on MSNBC".....That won't mean anything until Fox actually hires a hard hitting and charismatic liberal host in prime time.

    How about it 'Roger'? How about someone like Bill Maher? Give him his own unfettered show on Fox and I GUARANTEE you I will NEVER criticize Fox again!

    Jeff you're funny in your own moronic way.

    Why in the world would you re-post that exchange at 6:17 that makes YOU look bad.

    I've seen you do that at least a hundred times now.

    And you do realize my friend I can make the same claim about MSNBC......And dont give me the watered down spiel of Tucker and Joe S again

    Again, I submit you dont watch FNC which is your right...

    I'm out, be well

    i

    "Again, submit you don't watch fox which is your right."

    Actually I do, but only occasionally these days. However, I was virtually a captive audience to Fox both during and after the run up to the invasion.

    I don't see any evidence that they've changed much.

    oberman is one of those self-appointed "self-proclaimed" intellectuals who fails miserably on the intellectual scale.

    As with the majority of those of the left, characteristics such as Character, Dignity, Honor, Integirty, Responsibility and Trust are tossed aside as they interfere with the normal spewing of leftist propaganda disguised as news.

    It is so unfortunate that a good majority of the American people rely on the MSM for their news. Many of these are basically unaware of just how biased and tainted the information they receive is. If these people received an HONEST report of the events in the US and in Iraq and the rest of the world, the support for the War on Terror - Iraq Phase would be substantially higher, The people could then see what has happened and in why President Bush has deemed this portion of the war so necessary.

    Maybe President Bush should estabish a new department. Following the blueprint of the former Soviet Untion, he could create the Department of Misinformation and in this department, list all of the corrupt news organizations.

    Thanks for filling me in there my Bovine loving dumbshit friend, hey o o o o o

    "Maybe President Bush should establish a new department. Following the blueprint of the former Soviet Union, he could create the Department of Misinformation and in this department, list all of the corrupt news organizations."

    I had to look closely to make sure that post wasn't a spoof, because it is hard to believe anyone would make a post like that.

    We already HAVE a "Department of Misinformation"! It is inseparably embedded within the Bush Administration.

    Just what this country needs, another layer of corruption care of W. ... that said, why not roll that new operation into Homeland Security, the biggest artery-clogging piece of federal fatback in decades.

    However, I was virtually a captive audience to Fox both during and after the run up to the invasion.

    Why?

    Who else is more qualified to rely the administration's intentions than FNC?

    So why doesn't Mike watch it all the time?

    Warner: "Does the [Iraq war] make America safer?"

    Petraeus replied, "I don't know, actually. I have not sat down and sorted in my own mind."


    I guess a paycheck's just a paycheck to some fellas.


    Posted by: Sir Loin of Beef at September 11, 2007 5:53 PM

    What if he had responded yes, we are safer? That is a heck of a way to make a paycheck. It is not as if he ever endangered his own life or spent time away from his family or has been subjected to an extraordinary amount of pressure. Easy money, being the general that betrayed us.

    "So why doesn't Mike watch it all the time?"

    I have a weak stomach :)

    So, Faux Noise isn't conservative, but all the conservatives here would rather die than watch anything else, because it's so fair. They'll attack anybody who disagrees with what Fox says, because it's NOT conservative.

    Is that about the size of it.

    Faux Noise is so chocked full of cowardice, it makes sense that Bush fans would cotton to it.

    Here's a challenge: rather than have on small 'l' liberals that Roger Ailes thinks provide balance, put up a poll on some actual Liberal websites to see which folks the Liberals themselves would like to see debate *any* of your conservative Fox drones, on *any* topic:

    Rachel Maddow
    Bill Maher
    Robert F. Kennedy, Jr
    Bill Moyers
    Glenn Greenwald
    John Amato
    Jane Hamersher

    So strong is your argument that it can't brook legitimate debate?

    You're so pathetic; you howl that Liberals are given a fair voice on Fox, just so long as it's Nixon's former communications maven that's picking who's debating for the left.

    Bill Maher was on O'Reilly last week; he has been on the program a number of times. I watch Fox News, but I also watch the other networks as well. I don't like Hannity and agree that he monopolizes the show.

    O'Reilly has given Bill Moyers an open invitation to come on his show and to date has not accepted. Unbeknownst to spolbyloons, Bill Maher and Bill O are considered "friends," according to Bill O.

    In response to slobs post, if Patraeus claimed we are "safer" now than before, slob would simply call him a liar.

    Jeff: "In response to slob's post, if Patraeus claimed we are "safer" now than before, slob will simply call him a liar."

    But he DIDN'T say we are safer!

    If the defenders of Obermann are representative of the "news" and intellectualism of this show, then I think I will pass.

    Good luck with your "Ober News".

    Jeff: "In response to slob's post, if Patraeus claimed we are "safer" now than before, slob will simply call him a liar."

    But he DIDN'T say we are safer!

    Posted by: Mike at September 11, 2007 9:53 PM


    No shit, Sherlock. I was making a point. You didn't get, I'm not drawing you a road map.

    Jeff: "I was makeing a point."

    I know Jeff, but your points are so pointless!

    Slob already called Patreaus a liar and a deceiver earlier today. That was my point in regards to the "are we safer" question, punks. Or, punk.

    "That was my point in regards to the "are we safer" question, punks, or punk."

    Yes Jeff. I already told you I 'got' your 'point' the first time. However, your was SO pointless that it wouldn't have penetrated a stick of hot butter.

    But hey, thanks for the "road map".

    Heh, heh!

    Hey, what composition was that playing while Olberman was speaking?By whom? I'd like to hear more of it.

    In response to slobs post, if Patraeus claimed we are "safer" now than before, slob would simply call him a liar.

    Posted by: royal king at September 11, 2007 9:46 PM

    rk is correct. Anyone who asserts that America is safer now than it was on Septemper 12, 2001, is a fool or a liar. I don't get the idea that the magic general is a fool - he has merely handed his integrity over to Bush wrapped in the bloody clothing of our troops.

    We already HAVE a "Department of Misinformation"! It is inseparably embedded within the Bush Administration.

    Posted by: Mike at September 11, 2007 6:35 PM

    Jon Stewart on Tony Snow's departure from the White House beause of "financial reasons":

    "He can make a lot more money saying exactly the same things on Fox News".

    “President Eisenhower warned of the growing military industrial complex in his farewell address. Since Dick Cheney can now afford solid gold oil derricks, it’s safe to say we failed Ike miserably. After losing two friends and over a dozen comrades, I have this to say: Do not wage war unless it is absolutely, positively the last ditch effort for survival. ....In the future, I want my children to grow up with the belief that what I did here was wrong, in a society that doesn’t deem that idea unpatriotic,”

    Spc. Alex Horton, 22, of the 3rd Stryker Brigade

    http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/news/2007/09/ap_soldierblogs_070909/


    Why would you give General Petraeus - who has risen to the top following five years of rigorous lap-dog selection by the administration - more credence than this front-line soldier, who has managed to get his message out despite harsh measures by the military to squelch such dissent from the troops?

    Olbermann speaks the TRUTH!!!! You morons are too stupid to pick up a book and read. Bush is the worst president in my life time. A bunch of crooks and criminals running the country into the ground for profit and power.

    He is talking about linking journalists to Al-Qaeda being un-American. Since when is Fox News journalism?

    My solution to this problem is simple.
    Hunt down this communist cocksucker and blow his head off with a 44-Magnum handgun.
    I am ready to sacrifice my life in order to silince this fucking scumbag permanently.

    Bob K.

    How about throwing some of that will to sacrifice towards your president's holy war? I hear they're accepting applications.

    Wow! Olberman really scares you guys! So you can dish it but you can't take it, Huh? Where were all of you "civil liberties patriots" when Fox Noise was doing the name calling?

    Oh my, Keith... surely you've learned at one point or another never to compare any organization, person, event, object, or anything to the KKK... that's just... common knowledge...

    Bob K.

    I would refrain from making such statements if I were you. The Secret Service began investigating Bill 0rly's site for similar statements made against Hilary Clinton. Granted Keith O doesn't have the protection of The Secret Service like The Clintons do, but the FBI does handle "Terroristic Threats" made on US Citizens. Especially on Websites centralized within the United States.

    Please Seek Help. You owe it to your family and neighbors.

    8:02, if that's the case "Bill O'Lielly" would have been in the can long ago. He's an olbyloon in case you aren't familiar with him. Unless the secret service investigators are clinton cronies, that would make sense why he's not in jail. It also makes sense why they would only be looking into cinton threats. HMMM.

    They'd only be looking into Clinton Threats because The Clintons have protection from the Secret Service for a lifetime.

    That's because Bill Clinton is an ex-president and Hillary is a Senator.

    To answer your claim, The Secret Service wouldn't be the ones to arrest Bob K., nor would they be the ones to investigate and arrest Bill O'Lielly.

    Why?

    The Secret Service doesn't handle threats against non-government affiliated civilians. Only presidents, ex-presidents, senators and members of the house.

    Of course you would know that if you did any research. That's mainly why I mentioned the FBI.

    Besides, just because nobody has reported The Secret Service investigating any other threats besides one against The Clintons doesn't mean they aren't. It just means that people like you who think they have it all figured out have no idea what The Secret Service is doing, let alone all about.

    That's why it's a "Secret". ^.~

    "OK, olbyloon."

    That's it? That's all you have? You've fired off your munitions and they amounted to "OK, olbyloon."?

    Just what I thought. Another Right Wing side full of people when faced a rebuttal shrink into a corner an use sad attempts at insults like "Olbyloon".

    Seriously that's all you have. Man. No good debates to be found amongst those who refuse to believe they could possibly be wrong even when faced with me. Reality Peaking In.

    It just means that people like you who think they have it all figured out have no idea what The Secret Service is doing, let alone all about

    Posted by: Reality Peaking In at September 12, 2007 8:43 PM


    Is this your interpretation of debating?

    Hi! It`s no bad.
    See my site too!

    http://ford-tractor.infocatalogs.info/ford8n-tractor.html ">ford8n tractor

    Bay.

    Olbermann admits he's Un-American. Olbermann is caught in lie-after-lie yet his lunatic fan base insists on calling him the Edward R. Murrow of our time. Unfuckingbelievable.

    "Olbermann admits he's Un-American. Olbermann is caught in lie-after-lie yet his lunatic fan base insists on calling him the Edward R. Murrow of our time. Unfuckingbelievable."

    That does it!
    You've convinced me, finally.
    I'm joining the 28-percent club!

    That does it!
    You've convinced me, finally.
    I'm joining the 28-percent club!


    Posted by: at September 15, 2007 1:23 PM


    We don't want you, thanks anyways.

    Olbermann admits he's Un-American.
    ------------------------------------------
    This is, I am sure, a lie. You Republians lie a lot, don't you?

    > If they told the truth, they 'd look even more disingenous.

    Oh, this from the guy who just last night was spinning falsehoods about the Dem response on Fox News? Yeah, you're the guy to turn to for truth.

    > Funny how you are so worried about me spinning falsehoods about Fox news

    Oh is that your way of squirming out of the fact that you were exposed as an unreliable propagandist? No wonder you're so desperate to defend your colleague Olbermoronn. And since he is indefensible, no wonder that you continue to change the subject to deflect from the infamous, deplorable Keith Olbermann.

    > I don't hear a peep out of you.

    Why should I give you a peep? This site isn't an Iraq war site, or a President's nose is growing site. It's a KEITH OLBERMANN site. Perhaps you'd like to find a site devoted to, say, hoe-handles, and go over there and start posting lies about Fox News, or bringing up Iraq and tell them how eeevil they are for talking hoe-handles when they could be getting your deep insights about the Iraq war. And based on what you've posted on this site, we all know how reliable your "insights" are.

    Olbyloon smackdown advantage? To Johnny Dollar!

    And from "Truth"? Crickets. She's probably busy posting her 9999 other screen names elsewhere on the internets in support of her imaginary boyfriend.

    Right off the wire? How about right off the internet from the O-P-I-N-I-O-N pages of Daily Kos, Democratic Underground, MoveOn.Org, Media Matters, and the Huffington Post. The problem is that Olbermann's fanatical fans (and Think is surely one aren't you? So crazy that they don't even let you post on some of the fan boards anymore. By the way--how is that "family vacation w/o internet access coming along for you?). Anyway, The problem is that Olbermann's fanatical fans are so brainwashed that they honestly believe Olbermann is a genuine news source. Why? Because he gets his talking points straight from the liberal blogs, sites them as news sources, and reinforces ever whacko opinion that his audience already held. They wouldn't know real news if it hit them across their Leona-ugly faces!

    P.S. to "Think"---that line "So I'm assuming YOU're over at other sites condemning the Iraq War and all of Bush's lies? Of course not. You're one of Bush's biggest apologists or you wouldn't be at this site."

    That has got to be one of the finest examples of Olbylogic/Circular Thinking that we've seen yet here at this board.

    This site isn't called "Bush Apologists", it's OLBERMANNWATCH. I realize you're mentally challenged and obviously your grip on sanity is very tenuous at best, but how hard of a concept is that to get for you?

    You and your other sheep love to lie about that too.

    Posted by: Why don't you think at September 16, 2007 10:34 AM


    I asked you about a week ago if you would mind citing one of these supposed lies and you never did. Is this one of your "insights" that's "based on facts" you were telling us about? Where's the facts? Facts are usually associated with some kind of proof. Maybe you can find something for us on the ap about Johnny lying......I know, get ahold of the US State Dept, maybe they have some evidence of Johnny lying about Olbermahn.

    > My "insights" are based on facts.

    Like the "fact" that Fox News didn't carry the Dem response? Those sorts of "facts"? These are the sort of "facts" that have made your reputation here, and it's not a good one.

    > You're one of Bush's biggest apologists

    Is this another one of your "facts"? Why don't you come up with a citation to back this one up? You were left running to hide in your bathtub when your Dem response fantasy was exposed as fictional. So why not redeem yourself. Come up with the quotes from me that back up your claim that I'm a big Bush apologist. Take your time. We'll be here listening to the crickets, waiting for you to come through again.

    > Prove me wrong !

    Here's a bit of a logic lesson for our faithful readers.

    Question: What does a liar do when he's challenged on a lie?
    Answer: He falls back on, Prove I'm wrong!

    The first thing anyone who truly believes in "facts" understands is that when a person makes an accusation, it's up to him to back it up. The burden of proof is on the accuser. That's Logic 101.

    If I were a liar I could say WDYT is a car thief and a drug user, based on nothing at all. When WDYT asks for proof, I just shoot back, "Come Clean! Prove I'm Wrong!"

    Poor little WDYT, exposed again for what you are. I didn't have to wait long for you to admit defeat once again. The bottom line on all this is: he has no quotes from me to back up what he says. His charge is a lie that he just made up on the spot, because he was cornered. And liars, when cornered, tend to compound their lies with more of the same.

    No quotes, no back up, no proof, no evidence, no documentation, other than "because I said so" and "prove you aren't". The last refuge of a scoundrel, and a liar.

    > Of course there are no QUOTES of you supporting Bush.

    Well, duh. There are no quotes of you denying you are a car thief either. So that means "you and I both know" you're a huge car thief.

    I think it's time for you to go back upstairs. I think your mom has some blueberry muffins for you. You can continue to post here but it will be a waste of time. Everyone now sees you for what you are.

    Guilty until proven innocent: the law on OlbyPlanet, as espoused by Olbyloon in Chief WDYT. Listen, oh high and mighty one who used to insist that his insights were based on "facts" (I guess that line of argument is now inoperative! LOL!)--I don't write to order for you or any Olbyloon.

    My political affiliation is none of your business and is completely irrelevant. Whether I support Bush, or Che Guevera, or Ron Paul, or Mike Gravel DOESN'T CHANGE ONE THING about Keith Olbermann. It doesn't change on thing about the articles I post here, which are no more or less correct regardless of whom I politically support.

    It's because the Olbypologists can't defend Olbermann, and can't argue with the posts at this site, that they launch into irrelevancies, the latest of which is ad hominem attacks on me. The theory is that attacking me will somehow change the truth of what is written on this site.

    WDYT is either too cowardly or too ill-informed (I vote for the latter, based on his piss-poor showings in the comments) to address directly the points this site raises. So he launches incoherent personal attacks on the writers, making up things and then perposterously claiming that if the victim doesn't engage him about his personal attacks, that proves the victim is automatically guilty--without a shred of evidence!

    What an embarrassment to the Olbypologist community! I have a feeling they'll be asking for WDYT (a question he should ask himself) to turn in his Olby bobble-head doll.

    WDYT should be more correctly named: I can't think, therefore, I'm an Olbyfan".

    Oh, you forgot to tell us again how all your "insights" are based on "facts".

    I am a supporter of the truth about the infamous, deplorable Keith Olbermann, exposing his lies, and marvelling at the incoherent droolings of the genus Olbyloon, on display in this thread in its natural habitat. In particular, Mr YDYT, who when he has no evidence shrieks "prove me wrong", shortly after bragging that his insights are based on "facts". Everyone sees him for what he is, but he persists, which is fine with me. It helps insure that this stie will remain the #1 Keith Olbermann blog in the world.

    patsy, how long did it take you to pull that drivel out of your ass?

    BTW...My "insights" are based on facts. I also posted the sources for my facts, as no other on this site has done.
    So keeping spinning and lying away.

    When you can come up with better sources than the US State Dept, then get back to me.

    I don't expect to hear from you, coward.
    Posted by: Why don't you think at September 16, 2007 10:30 AM


    Now, WDYT, it's already been established here that your way of "sourcing" usually is to cut-n-paste from blog sites and opinion pieces without attribution.

    We shouldn't complain though. Left to think for yourself, the best you can do when defending yourself after being caught repeating NONfactual crap about FNC ( that you read on some "news source", i.e. blueblog...) is to then starting yelling that someone else is a "Bush supporter".

    Somhow you think that this is such a shameful appellation that it absolves you from being a dim-witted moron.

    It doesn't. There's no vote you can cast for any candidate, anywhere, that will change that for you.

    I don't get it. O'Reilly uses the exact same language all of the time. Just yesterday he said that moveon.org was like the Nazis. He has compared the dailykos to the kkk and the Nazis on numerous occasions. I enjoy Olberman AND O'Reilly, but neither of them has a very realistic historical view of what separates an activist or ideological bias from a truly dangerous extremist movement.

    Such a great American you are, Sean Hannity..I mean Cecilia.
    |||---|||---|||
    You owe Sean Hannity an apology. But I will admit Ceceilia has a better mustache.

    You're just a bad joke aren't you? I mean nobody's that stupid.

    I just don't watch him. If I watch cable news at 8, I watch a little of O'Reilly & Nancy Grace but I never watch this guy.

    Thanks for your quote, Posted by: ArcherB at September 11, 2007 4:54 PM.

    I had never seen it and I plan on keeping it for future reference.

    Grammie

    Robert F Kennedy has been on Fox several times that I've seen.

    So far that makes two that have been on that the Libs say they really, really want.

    I would like to see Newt on Countdown.

    What do you think the chances are?.

    Grammie

    I like Foxnews because we get both sides of an issue. I'm an Independent & vote for the person . The networks, Cnn, Msnbc, tend to be liberal so why some people feel so threatened by Foxnews except they only want to hear the liberal side. I like to know both.

    Anonymous, you just don't want to hear two sides of an issue. Your liberal & deplore any other views besides your own.

    I vote for the person, not a party, & I watch Foxnews. Why watch only the liberal view when I can watch Fox & get views from both sides of the aisle. I really don't watch Olberman because he doesn't make much sense. Frankly, the ones that make sense to me are those who fall in the middle.

    Thanks, patsy!

    I haven't a clue.

    Posted by: A N O N Y M O U S at December 21, 2007 10:20 AM


    Old news, philby.

    Your crown as the (Out Of) Context King is well secure, your brilliant thing you.

    Posted by: A N O N Y M O U S at December 21, 2007 12:30 PM


    This, coming from someone who claims to be an expert on beastiality and who responds to cowardly namejackers, even egging them on. Whatever you do, 'mike' DO NOT call philby or patsy a troll! You have a fine reputation to uphold.......

    Jeff: "Whatever you do Mike, don't call Philby or Patsy a troll!"

    If you will refer back to the dictionary definition of a "troll" that I spoon fed you a few days ago, I think you will see that the definition applies to someone who attempts to derail otherwise thoughtful debate with endless straw man arguments and personal attacks.

    Thats YOU Jeff!

    Since many of their antics are directed at YOU, I'm not really sure if the word really applies to them or not.....since you are never known to actually engage in thoughtful debate?

    After all, how can a troll troll a troll?

    After all, how can a troll troll a troll?

    Posted by: Mike at December 21, 2007 2:30 PM


    Spoken like a true troll!

    Cmon....You should be nice to Jeff..afterall....we are his best friends and he would be lost w/o this site.
    Just imagine, his best friends are bovines and fantasy people on the internet.

    Posted by: Why Don't You Think at December 21, 2007 7:02 PM
    You mean Sharon is a fantasy? Thank Heavens! The women in my fantasies tend to be much more alluring, but it is a comfort to know she isn't real.

    Posted by: A N O N Y M O U S at December 21, 2007 9:09 PM


    What was it that 'mike' was saying about 'intelligent conversation?' Just our daily dose of hypocrisy. Keep defending them, 'mike,' they're on your side.

    I'm no namejacker Daddy. You're always putting me down.

    I hate you, and I'm not washing your skidmarked drawers again.

    "What was it that 'mike' was saying about 'intelligent conversation?' Just our daily dose of hypocrisy. Keep defending them, 'mike,' they're on your side."

    Well , lets be honest, the conversation turned to shit when your subhuman ass started posting RK.

    RK! the man who never met he point he understood.

    I guess 10:39 considers 9:35 intelligent conversation. Shocker.

    "I guess 10:39 considers 9:35 intelligent conversation. Shocker."

    Well compared to you, yes.

    Anyone lookin for a roomie?
    I kicked Jeff out cuz the apartmint started smellin like a pettin zoo.

    Philby, you obviously haven't been under a mini'skirt, lately, or ever for that matter. A moo moo is probably the smallest thing you have ever been under.

    This from the expert on calfs and women's fashion. Everyone meet the cross dressing, barn yard animal loving RK!

    I've been a Detroit auto worker for 27 years. I was struck by a hilo and that ended my career.I've always been a staunch supporter of the democratic party until the war.Then I noticed the weakness. My young son here in Michigan loves Obama and went to vote for him today,however when my state most needed a political party to help are job situation here the Democratic party refused to see our emergency for a primary and only saw the loss of democratic support because of Clinton's NAFTA agreement which sent all our jobs out and leave my state! I think the democrats sensed this just as they turned their backs on the Pittsburgh's steel mill's job loss.When are the democrats going to stand for the small guy again and not for the majority votes? That's why I as well as most union workers only have faith left in the Republican partry as any hope for jobs! I had to apologize to my son today for the Democrats not caring about his vote! I guess they don't understand the emergency of the people here. I hate to think how they will abandon the nation if it won't get them any more power.What a horrible slap to my son's first voting experience.(Sorry son,your vote does'nt count) What kind of government does this sound like to you people? I weep for future generations.

    I've been a Detroit auto worker for 27 years. I was struck by a hilo and that ended my career.I've always been a staunch supporter of the democratic party until the war.Then I noticed the weakness. My young son here in Michigan loves Obama and went to vote for him today,however when my state most needed a political party to help are job situation here the Democratic party refused to see our emergency for a primary and only saw the loss of democratic support because of Clinton's NAFTA agreement which sent all our jobs out and leave my state! I think the democrats sensed this just as they turned their backs on the Pittsburgh's steel mill's job loss.When are the democrats going to stand for the small guy again and not for the majority votes? That's why I as well as most union workers only have faith left in the Republican partry as any hope for jobs! I had to apologize to my son today for the Democrats not caring about his vote! I guess they don't understand the emergency of the people here. I hate to think how they will abandon the nation if it won't get them any more power.What a horrible slap to my son's first voting experience.(Sorry son,your vote does'nt count) What kind of government does this sound like to you people? I weep for future generations.

    It's not a bail out! It's a fair playing field! Keep the foreign markets equal to the exports they distribute.They can only give us what they can take from us.Don't flood the market. The real Jerry Last guy was'nt me. Don't mock me unless you think you can walk a mile in my shoes.

    When I watched the Republican debate, it was all 9/11, Raygun, Raygun, 9/11, no recession here, Raygun, 9/11. A party with one foot in a past that wasn't all that great and the other foot in a pool of deep denial.

    Tonight, I heard the economy being seriously debated, I heard Iraq being debated, and I saw a high degree of civility while doing both. It was a very good time.

    Posted by: A N O N Y M O U S at January 16, 2008 12:08 AM


    Contrary to Dinjee Harry's lies a while back, "The war is lost," we are still at war. Hence, debating war and national security issues. We know, the (d)'s like to talk about welfare, hiking taxes to line their pockets, legalizing drugs, cuban healthcare and important stuff like that. Oh yea, wide open borders, another important socialist topic.

    That's my boy Anonymous! Keep it up! Allah loves you!

    Make them believe that 9/11 happened 100 years ago, and then honor the democratic traiters debating how quick they will stop killing the rest of my terrorists.

    I'm sure you had a very good time with the democratic debate, as did I, as the more they stay away from the important issues (like the survival of your weak country from my terrorists) and strive to prove who is the weakest candidate among them, the easier it will be for me to carry out my plans to destroy your weak country.

    Soon the war against terror will be over (Allah willing with a democratic victory come November) along with the slaughtering of my loyal subjects, and I will be able to get back to slaughtering your innocent civilians once again.

    Keep blowing smoke my little cherub, as nobody does it better than you.

    Akuba! Ayeee!!!!

    Read the Stratfor annual intelligence report. It was an eye opener. $13.2 trillion GDP for the U.S. If you take China,Japan,U.K.,Russia and the middle East combine them all and they still don't have as much of a robust economy or GDP as the U.S. A recession is needed and cyclical.It restores the true value back to the dollar.Sometimes are economy is just to big for the rest of the world.That and our navy keeps the worlds economy surging forward.God I love this country!

    This is a change election, and these are going to have to change, too.

    Posted by: A N O N Y M O U S at January 16, 2008 8:59 AM

    Yea, so was 04, so was 00, so was 96, so was 92. The d's have no plan, just "change." Perfect.......Oh, wait, raise taxes and keep the borders wide open.

    We know, the (d)'s like to talk about welfare, hiking taxes to line their pockets, legalizing drugs,

    Posted by: royal king at January 16, 2008 12:34 AM

    As long as YOUR drug is legal, you're ok, right RK?

    As long as you can go out with your 32yo hottie and get your $40/pitcher margaritas, you're all set.

    Another hypocrite. Probably drunk as a skunk while riding his horses, yet talks about everyone else's "drugs". Last time I checked your $40/pitcher margs qualified as drugs numbnuts.

    Great, the loser now is posting as phony osama. Yep, he's an olbyloon!

    Unlike you, the real Osama makes sense. The real Osama that posts on this blog, that is. I know how you olbyloons are easily confused so I have to draw a road map for ya.

    you could very well be the dumbest person I've ever come in contact with though, and that is something. The truly amusing part is one gets the feeling you don't know it.

    Posted by: at January 16, 2008 6:17 PM

    It must be true, since a coward like you says so. Here, I'll even agree with you if it will make you feel better. Give yourself a little pat on the back and go tell your friends how smart you are, ok? "why/some 75 others/anon is the smartest person on the internets!!!!!!!! Happy now, cowy? Hurry up and copy and paste something and add your little dumb ass comments to make it look like you wrote it, ok?

    ...but wait. I did not mention that RK, through his Jihad; through his selfless sacrifice of so much and then so much more of his and your precious tax dollars - representing as it does the very future of all of you and your loved ones - is providing my struggle with a multitude of passionate recruits. It is as a gift from heaven.

    Without the bellows of Bush's - and friend RK's - hated occupation of the helpless Iraq, my Mujahedeen and myself would long ago have been cornered friendless; and ended our fight in glorious sacrifice. But now we are bouyed and shielded by the brotherhood of tens of thousands who cry for Iraq,

    ..and who have paid their ten-dollar entry fee and earned their first three merit badges.

    You rock. You're like my agent or something.

    Peace, American warmongers!

    ...but wait. I did not mention that RK, through his Jihad; through his selfless sacrifice of so much and then so much more of his and your precious tax dollars - representing as it does the very future of all of you and your loved ones - is providing my struggle with a multitude of passionate recruits. It is as a gift from heaven.

    Without the bellows of Bush's - and friend RK's - hated occupation of the helpless Iraq the furnace which tempers my Mujahedeen and myself would long ago gone cold. Long ago, we would have been cornered friendless; and ended our blessed fight in glorious sacrifice. But now we are bouyed and shielded by the brotherhood of tens of thousands who cry for Iraq,

    ..and who have paid their ten-dollar entry fee and earned their first three merit badges.

    You rock. You're like my agent or something.

    Peace, American warmongers!

    You should be ashamed of yourselves.

    Posted by: at January 16, 2008 11:12 PM


    "I don't think about him that much...you know, I really don't spend that much time on him."
    Guess who.

    Leave a new comment