seconds after i write something similair, olbermann proves everyone right again...
stupid olby, doesn't he realize that the grass only *seems* greener on the other side. what a spoiled brat. it is what it is, and he sure as hell can't change ANYTHING. perhaps Oreilly can.

moron paranoid FASCIST BU$HWIPES!

"Either you are with us or against us"

>>moron paranoid FASCIST BU$HWIPES!

"Either you are with us or against us"

Posted by: Average American Patriot at September 11, 2007 1:00 AM

...FIRST!

looooooooooooser!!!!!.....

"Either you are with us or against us"

Posted by: Average American Patriot at September 11, 2007 1:00 AM

The most intelligent post patsy has ever made. I agree with you, patsy.

not a real good day for olbermann here on olbywatch? I bet he's writing a special comment as we speak.

1:00 am still stands as patsy's most intelligent post. Maybe someday he'll top it. One can only hope......by the way, how's that democratic congress rating holdin' up, or down, I should say?

What's the difference...

between Olby and a steamy bag of shit? THE BAG! HA!

Ah, Olberbama Keithladen finally gives it up...BTW Who was his worst person in the NFL last night? Pat Tillman? Oh, no wait he accused Bush of assasinating Tillman.

It's a good thing you save the tapes Johnny. They always seem to come in handy.

What miniscule, ioda of respect I had for the bastard is out the door. The man is nothing but a maggot; not worth his weight in dog shit. Olbermann shouldn't be allowed within a thousand feet of a mike let alone hosting a news show on a cable news network.

Wait!

When did Fox News hire qualified reporters?

Considering the loser that's on MSNBC, Fox could have hired a crack whore and still have someone more qualified than that obnoxious jackass Olberfag.

I hadn't realize O'Reilly/Hume/etc. had crack habits, but that helps explain the quality of their "work."

Which begs the question, what the hell is Olby smoking to be even more fucked up than a crack whore?

Nice clip.

Unfortunately, you're assuming the typical Fox News fan is literate. But look on the bright side, they're poor listeners.

Hell, what's more American than the KKK?

"Hell, what's more American than the KKK?"

Fox News, apparently.

Actually, I'd love to see a law suit come out of this.
I love train wrecks.

It's a shame we listen to our own eyes and ears and not Olby's bullshit. The man acts all morally outraged when Bush says 'you're either with us or against us' but compares everyone who disagrees with him to the Klan and says they're worse than Al Quada even though he complains about being compared to Al Quada. The man's a whiny bitch who can't take the shit he dishes out to others. If he wants to take the low road, fine, but don't piss and moan when someone returns the favor.

He's just swiping a page from O'Reilly's book --I'm half-serious about it. It seems to be a venom-to-venom pissing contest.

Going by the other posts here, we must be borrowing from the same book.

He's like the snot nosed bratty little kid that throws rocks at you're dog and then runs into his house.

One day that dog is gona get loose.

I've never seen this guy debate anything.

When that day comes.

Stupid is, as stupid will look.

I can't wait till this week's ratings come out... then the blue blogs will wax poetically "remember on September 7th, 2007 when our hero Keith beat Oreilley in the covetted demo when we add the DVR numbers?"

It all comes out in the wash and this anti-american deserves a swift uppercut. My guess is he gets bitch slapped regularly by good americans. They force him to take those random days off to nurse his bruises.

Good and absolutely fair presentation, J$....Olbermann smears an entire new organization "media outlet" as worse than Al Queda terrorists. My view of his silly reference to the KKK also stands.....How could anyone equate a cable news outlet to a violent and racist organization that worked secretly to oppress people only based on their race or creed?

Yes, Keith Olbermann....you are anti-American.

On the heals of these comments...
saying republicans will attack every country if they remain in power and insisting a news netowk is worse than al queda, the loons have a new matra. do you still stand by this dingbat with his outrageous and unsubstantiated commets?

he spews this trash out without follow-up. why doesn't someone call this weakling out, so he can dig a deeper hole? he has nothing but rhetoric.

Loons are MIA- its hard to defend such a whacko...
He has become a figure of what is wrong with the democrats going into 2008... I hope Hillary goes on his show.

nice piece...nice theme music.

King of the loons is unhinged about Fox
To the viewing public he is a pox
Except to the leftist Treason Lobby
Where hating the US is more than a hobby
Krazy Keith should stick to sniffing jocks

I eagerly await the day when Keith does a Howard Beale and blows his brains out on national Tv and a nation of Olbyloons will martyr him like he was Martin Luther King or something

Fact is, having worked for FNC for several years, there is no finer group of people who work harder in the news industry

Knowing people who work at MSNBC, it is no joke, Olbermanns attacks are written off of web blogs that have been long outlined here. There is no original thought, and the man has no courage to debate anyone from the other side. He fancies himself Edward R Murrow...I knew people who worked with Edward R Murrow and You sir are no Edward R Murrow

Gibsons bathtub boy stories are 100 percent correct with no level of bshit in them, here is a guy whose tremendously insecure and who will self distruct ineviatbly

Best to all

The liberals hatred of Fox News is matched only by their hatred of Bush and the GOP. What they totally fail to take into consideration is that not all conservatives or independents watch Fox or the fact that there are liberals who DO watch Fox, if for no other reason, to stay apprised of what the the GOP talking points are.

In their black and white world, it's much easier for them to paint all Fox Viewers as GOPers or all GOPers as Fox Viewers. That can't possibly be true given their ratings, their viewership and the testimony of liberals who admit they watch Fox. But the left barks like Pavlov's dog when they hear the words "Fox News". And Olbermann in his comments to Playboy, tried to make the outrageous claim that somehow, Fox is more dangerous than Al Qaeda and is responsible for the murder of thousands of people when it was all the networks who cheerlead for the Iraq war, including Olbermann who was on the air at the time and never voiced a single objection on air to the war. It wasn't just Fox, it was all the networks, but in Olbermann's revisionist thinking, and in that of the mindless viewers who don't question a single word he says ever, it's all suddenly Fox News's fault. It isn't. There are many fingers that can be pointed and as the old saying goes, when you point your finger at someone, there are four more pointing back to you. The "You" in this case would be the Democratic members of Congress and the Senate who voted for the War, it would be ALL the news networks who remained deathly silent during the build-up to war and failed to ask questions, but most importantly, it would be Keith Olbermann who had his own news program at the time of the build-up to war and was just as much a cheerleader as anyone on Fox ever dared to be. Again, revionist thinking somehow is looking over these known facts.

But again, like Pavolov's dog--mention Fox and these people foam at the mouth, no questions asked. Some have never even watched Fox and have no idea whatsoever what the network is really like, they just make assumptions (usually false) based upon what they have read or heard from fellow liberals. Olbermann plays into that hatred against Fox, using his own personal vendettas to score points with his liberal audience. And they accept what he says, without questioning it, even when they've never watched the network. How is that any different than the "Dittoheads" of Rush Limbaugh? But yet, the liberals try to claim they are smarter, intellectually superior and all of that. And yet, they are not. They are the same, no matter what they try to claim. In fact, they may be far worse.

Olbermann and his fans seem to think it's the worst thing in the world that conservatives MIGHT watch Fox because it's. . . biased! But they have no problem whatsoever in watching Olbermann who is far more radically to the left than the Fox crew is to the right. They see no contradiction in terms whatsoever in their stance and fail to get the irony of it all.

In the end, the only thing that separates Olbermann and O'Reilly is that one leans to the left, one leans to the right. Both are egomaniacs. Both use their shows as a bully pulpit. But at least O'Reilly properly labels his program as an opinion show. Olbermann and his fans still insist that he has a news program. Yet Olbermann is far from being a reporter. He doesn't report on-scene from any breaking news story. He never travels to the site of a disaster. He remains firmly anchored to his anchor desk in the safety of the studio. Even the opinion guy, O'Reilly has traveled to Iraq. But not Olbermann, the "news anchor" whose every story choice is all about promoting a specific idealogy tailored to fit his liberal, leftist audience. Olbermann never has anyone on his show with a contrary opinion, no conservatives, no Republicans, no Republican candidates and that is OKAY with them. O'Reilly who does regularly have liberals on is chided because those liberal guests aren't "liberal enough". Huh? Say what?

Olbermann's biases and his outrageous statements aren't defensible. But yet, his fans try and send out "Let's Support" Keith memes on various websites, trying to spin public opinion towards him. They send out memos asking people to record his program on DVR/TIVO. They flood NBC/MSNBC with letters of support for him. And they never question him or object to a thing he has to say, be it a slam or slur at a female, a strange commentary supporting an admitted felon and dog-fighting, or a mistake, later clarified or apologized for. They insist that's not what he meant to say, even when he apologizes for something. In short, Olbermanns fans believe with all their might he can do or say no wrong. And when he does say or do something they KNOW is wrong, they still pretend he didn't say it or that's not what he meant and they spin accordingly with all their might, never admitting he screwed up, even when he does. If that's not a mindless dittohead, I don't know what else would be. There is NO difference. Yet, they are utterly blind to the irony of it all.

Keith in Iarq?

At this point the reception Olbermann would receive in Iraq would be hysterical. They would probably escort his MSNBC caravan through a mine field... oops!

There are few active military people (not on the NBC payroll) who think Olbermann's act is good for America. Unfortunately I can't say the same for veterans like fellow Mike, who continue to support Keith's fringe rants. Descent is good but to impune our Gen. David Petraeus as a liar is ridiculous.

So Keith - go to Iraq, and show us you have the same courage as our men in military. That military that you criticize daily.

Old news O!
But way to stay on top of things

You're a day late and a dollar short, O.....go to the KKK thread and see that the ratings "win" was discussed.

BillyO- did you hear we elected Bush a second time?
Proof positive Billyboy has dial-up still.

Pukes Below Average Length Dick:

"DUMBSHIT! I mean Bovine!

It breaks my heart to deliver the good news to you, but Dear Moron in Chief has gone from a 70% approval rate to hover around 30% +/-.

END QUOTE

Um, Olby/Mike Moore 101. GW's numbers were only in the 70's just after 911 when the world was united until liberal partisanship, pacifism and selfishness sat in. George Bush won the 2004 election with less than a 50% approval rating you dumb son of a bitch.

***********************************

Posts Below Average Intelligence:

Let me help you with your math, Bovine.

Around 70% of the AMERICAN PEOPLE IS NOT WITH MORON IN CHIEF.

END QUOTE

Let me help you with your math stupid ass. The 30% that still support George Bush are smarter, weathier and better armed than the rest of you fags. They just had a poll in North Carolina that found 51% agree with the way GW is handing the war in Iarq. Just because a bunch of Yankee fags or left coast fags count in a poll doesn't represent the whole country. That's like that stupid bitch Sanchez throwing up a BBC/ABC poll to Petreaus and the Ambassador. That stupid bitch couldn;t make it int he kitchen, damned sure couldn't make it in the bedroom so she thinks she can question a four star general. Hillarious.

***********************************

Posted by An Average Pussy

"Subtlety is lost on the dim witted. That's you DUMBSHIT! I mean, Bovine!"

END QUOTE

Thank that much of yourself do ya? I find that a lot in you little snoty nosed, dried up weener faggots. Um, let me break it to ya, you aint shit.

"Olbermann never has anyone on his show with a contrary opinion, no conservatives, no Republicans, no Republican candidates and that is OKAY with them."

As I have noted on this site with some regularity, this is Olbermann's greatest transgression and the sine qua non of the diasaterous left wing fringe propaganda-fest, Meltdown.

Olbermann knows that if he were ever to invite a conservative of even a middle of the road political commentator with a true concern for journalistic integrity, he would be taken to the woodshed. By avoiding dissenting opinion at all costs, Olbermann is allowed to foist irresponsible and lazily conceived commentary that is disconnected from the precepts of accurate and complete coverage of the questions raised. Olbermann never has to worry about being challenged, thus there is no need for him to use unbiased sources or to temper his grandiose bellowing worthy of Lyndon. LaRouche.

Let me ask those of you who can't bring yourself to acknowledge the true depravity of Olbermann's nightly love fest with left fringe sychophants and like minded stooges this question: If you were GM of MSNBC and you could clean house top to bottom, would you keep Keith "Fox is worse than al Quaeda" Olbermann or would you replace him with somebody else?

Countdown or the "evil" Fox News?
Fox is the one viewers choose
Because Keith's a buffoon
A stark raving loon
His colleagues greet him with "boos"

Bloats Ben Franklin:

"Wait!

When did Fox News hire qualified reporters?"

END QUOTE

Um, I don;t know if you are considering these FNC contributors/editors:

Ellen Ratner
Eleanor Cliff
Jaun Williams
Marla Eliason
Neil Gabler
Mort Kondrake
Susan Estrich
Kirsten Powers
Mary Ann Marsh
Laura Schwartz
Bob Beckel
Jeff Cohen
David Korn
Mark Mellman
Ellis Henican

Liberal contributors all just to named a very damned scant few that all are allowed to voice their opinion on every single program on FNC.

I tell ya what you dumb fuck, next time you want to open your mouth do us some good and plant your lips on Olby's anus so we don't have to hear your ignorance anymore.

Posted by Hank:

"As I have noted on this site with some regularity, this is Olbermann's greatest transgression and the sine qua non of the diasaterous left wing fringe propaganda-fest, Meltdown.

Olbermann knows that if he were ever to invite a conservative of even a middle of the road political commentator with a true concern for journalistic integrity, he would be taken to the woodshed. By avoiding dissenting opinion at all costs, Olbermann is allowed to foist irresponsible and lazily conceived commentary that is disconnected from the precepts of accurate and complete coverage of the questions raised. Olbermann never has to worry about being challenged, thus there is no need for him to use unbiased sources or to temper his grandiose bellowing worthy of Lyndon. LaRouche.

Let me ask those of you who can't bring yourself to acknowledge the true depravity of Olbermann's nightly love fest with left fringe sychophants and like minded stooges this question: If you were GM of MSNBC and you could clean house top to bottom, would you keep Keith "Fox is worse than al Quaeda" Olbermann or would you replace him with somebody else?"

END QUOTE

It's mopre than that Hank. Olby is a pussy. The man can not even carry on a conversation unless he is throwing flames. He has more convulsions and gag reflexes than Barney Frank pulling a gang bang train on 10 bull queers lined up in a row like a buffet.

Olby is just another loud mouth fuck that if you walked up and slapped him he would fall into a fetal position and ball like the little pussy he really is. IS there no wonder people like AAP and clucker admire the man. They are just like him.

You guys are hillarious! Keep up the comedy routine and Friday night will simply be the beginning of ratings to come. Thanks for all the help spreading the word on Countdown! The more folks you guys get to watch the fewer folks who answer:
1) Saddam was respnsible for 9/11
2) W.M.D. have been/will be found in Iraq.
3) AQI and AQ are one and the same.
4) AQ was in Iraq prior to March 2003
5) Bill O'Reilly won a Peabody

P.A.M.B.

Hank- Newsbusters exposed the NBC and MSNBC plan to increase ratings by appealing to liberal America. NBC decided they were failing to convert Fox News viewers, so they decided to dumb down their product and pander to the fringe left. Tada- you get the new MSNBC. Its the anti-fox... ratings and all. Fox wins- MSNBC is on the other side of the spectrum.

Vomits O'Lielly:

"That is the most poorly done piece of Journalism that I have ever seen, OW is to be thanked for showing us where the bottom really lies."

END QUOTE

You should know because you are looking up all day and every day from where you slime about at the rest of us. You know, it really is the haves and the have nots. You, Mike Lussy, AAP, CLucker, SLOB are the have nots. People that are making it today studied harder and have a better work ethic than you turds. It gives me complete satisfaction to know you aint cuttin it in the world today.

But, then again you are dead already.

Bawah! Friday ratings?
I pitty you poor third place hero and his fans-
PAMMY- See you Wednesday when Monday's ratings come out.

Fox doesn't have legit reporters plus Fox isn't a cable news network. It is a station with right wing propaganists who twist actual news to fit their agenda...just like Al-quaeda. They leave out important news that might hurt their party.
Most of their "so-called" journalists are nothing more than right wing radio talk show hosts with no credentials.
Had KO said those same words to CNN, I might have agree but since he attacked FNC , he lost no credibility with me.
Plus, he has now taken over the key demo in ratings over Billo. We'll see if those comments will effect his ratings.

Hurls Pamela:

"You guys are hillarious! Keep up the comedy routine and Friday night will simply be the beginning of ratings to come. Thanks for all the help spreading the word on Countdown! The more folks you guys get to watch the fewer folks who answer:
1) Saddam was respnsible for 9/11
2) W.M.D. have been/will be found in Iraq.
3) AQI and AQ are one and the same.
4) AQ was in Iraq prior to March 2003
5) Bill O'Reilly won a Peabody

P.A.M.B."

END QUOTE

A southern gentelman shouldn't slap a woman but when she has a mouth to match her no. 2 sized washtub ass and/or a face that can be found on a can of Alpo I'll make an excpetion.

1. We went to war with Iraq because they were in violation of UN resolution 1441 and because they were firing on our jets in the no-fly zone.

2. If you can find me where any Bush official said Sadam was repsonsible for 911 please post it. Until then you are fucking stupid.

3. WMD's. Well, lets just say it's a damned shame you weren't on some fact finding mission touring northern Iraq when Sadam gassed the Kurds therefore improving the gene pool here in the US with your elimination.

4. I don't give a fuck if AQ was in Iraq before 911. Sadam was a threat to the region and world peace you stupid shit.

5. It's dawgs like you that couldn't make it in the kitchen and can't find anyone to make it with in the bedroom that knows so much about the world. I'M DAMNED SURE YOU WILL BE HOME ON A FRIDAY NIGHT. It's a shame you weren't a first hand witenss when Sadam had entire familes bound and forced them to jump off or thrown one at a time off the roof of a 10 story building so that wives saw their husbands leap to their death or children saw their parents jumpt to their death and their only reliefe they would be forced to follow in the next few seconds. Youa re just a stupid bitch.

I bet your ass is as wide as a no. 2 washtub. Tell us the truth. I bet I've seen better faces on a jar of iodine.

Smatter 'Redneck' jerk, get tired of "Laura Bush", thought you'd move on from "Ted Nugent" too?

I concur that "redneck" is more apt to your hateful persona, but unfrotunately, it also insults a lot of decent rednecks who wouldn't be caught dead associating with the likes of you.

How in the HELL do you know who you're doing better than, and who your not? Do you REALLY believe most Americans are as pukishly SELFISH as you are and therefore choose their political beliefs based on personal wealth? If you do REALLY believe such tripe, then you are just as sad and selfish of a human being as your bombastic posts suggest.

You forget that you've bored us many times with your personal job situation, and I can assure you that NOBODY on this board either envy's you, nor is anyone impressed with your incesstant bragging about your so called 'accomplishments....least of all me.

Complete and total Jackass's like yourself only serve to confirm to me that I have the right outlook.

see you here tomorrow Joe?
one day is a ratings trend?
pathetic!

Post another chicken shit anonymous about to get rung up:

""Hell, what's more American than the KKK?"

Fox News, apparently."

END QUOTE

Damn, I didn't know United States Senator, Robert Byrd, Democrat WV worked for Fox News.

You are a dumb fuck.

If Olbermann gets some numbers let him have em...but with all the free press, pimping, primping and injecting him into NFL game coverage who's surprised at the numbers boost.

It's just hysterical to see the left create a hero out of a guy who is so transparent and void of any critical thinking and analysis.

Olbermann has NEVER EVER had one guest on that would challenge his Media Matter talking points.

Olbermann has the balls (or lack of) to throw stones at;
Katie Couric
Bill O'Reilly
Sean Hannity
Anderson Cooper

but guess what... while all of the above were over in Iraq (Cooper is now) Olbermann sits at home wiping CRISCO off his MLB bobble head dolls.

If people want to watch Olbermann thats great but don't for one second insult me with the "Olbermann is a journalist crap"!

Whats so ironic is Oblbermann has been relentless in his Fox News attacks as a "front" for conservatives and the white house when in fact Olbermann himself is perhaps the biggest front in news history for an "Anchorman/Journalist". Ron Burgundy would be proud.

redneck,

>>2. If you can find me where any Bush official said Sadam was repsonsible for 911 please post it. Until then you are fucking stupid.

Bush's own words, son:

I have reluctantly concluded, along with other coalition leaders, that only the use of armed force will accomplish these objectives and restore international peace and security in the area. I have also determined that the use of armed force against Iraq is consistent with the United States and other countries continuing to take the necessary actions against international terrorists and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organiza-tions, or persons who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001. United States objectives also support a transition to democracy in Iraq, as contemplated by the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 (Public Law 105-338).

1) - We went to war in Iraq because they were in violation of resolution 1441 and because they were firing on our jets in the no fly zone."....Thanks for admitting the president you admire so much is a liar! The official justifications were WMD and "mushroom clouds" and you damned well know it. Tell me again what UN's official position on our action? How the hell can you use a UN resolution as a justification for an attack that that very same UN officially opposed?

2) - "If you can find me where any Bush official said Sadam was repsonsible for 911, please post it. Until then you are fucking stupid.".....I can find you 100's of statements by Bush officials IMPLYING Saddam was responsible. OH, but THAT'S different, you say! It remains that the majority of AMericans were misled into believing he played a part in 911. In fact, the majority STILL believed it as late as the 2004 election. I'm proud to say I was never one of them. "Fucking stupid" calling people "fucking stupid".....how amusing!

3) - "WMDs.Well lets just say it's a shame you weren't on some fact finding mission when Sadam gassed the Kurds therefore improving the gene pool here in the US with your elimination.".....It's more of a shame that rubes like you always fail to mention that that particular piece of genocide occured about 15 years prior to our invasion, and most of the weapons inspectors no longer believed he had them.

4) - "I don't give a damn if AQ was in Iraq before 911. Sadam was a threat to the region and world peace you stupid shit."....No YOU stupid shit, Saddam was ACTUALLY a stabilizing influence between AQ, whom he was no friend of, and the radical Shia, who were his ideological enemies as well as his subjects....and he and his army was far too weak to be a "threat to the region".

And by the way caveman, it's SADDAM, not "Sadam"!

blindrat- please read again. Bush does not say Iraq as responsible for 9/11.

"Fox isn't a cable news network. It is a station with right wing propaganists who twist actual news to fit their agenda...just like Al-quaeda. . . Had KO said those same words to CNN, I might have agree but since he attacked FNC , he lost no credibility with me."

Posted by: libjoe67 at September 11, 2007 12:29 PM

OK, Joe if FOX is really a "station with right wing propaganists who twist actual news to fit their agenda" why would they allow so many liberal commentators on their program to express views contrary to conservatism ? (see post at 12:10 pm above) That doesn't sound like a very good strategy for " leav[ing] out important news that might hurt their party" which, according to you, is what FOX does.

If FOX is such an evil entity that you believe Olbermann's comparisons to al Quaeda are OK, what do you think of MSNBC? If "twisting the news" and
leav[ing] out important news that might hurt your party" are enough to be judged as contemptible as a terrorist organization, does MSNBC qualify in your book? Does the fact that Olbermann never allows dissenting opinion on his "news" show matter to you? Does the fact that Olbermann has breathed not a syllable about the criminal Hsu who who was one of Hillary's most prominent fundraisers concern you? Would that be an example of leav[ing] out important news that might hurt your party"? Just some questions to ponder.

anonymouse(1:04),

"I have also determined that the use of armed force against Iraq IS CONSISTANT with the United States and other countries continuing to take the necessary actions against international terrorists and terrorist organizations, INCLUDING those nations, organiza-tions, or persons who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001. "

If it INCLUDES them, son, they must be responsible. If you interperate it another way, I'd LOVE to hear it...

I love the idiots in here who hurl around "key demo" fox news is the anti christ, etc, etc.....Working in television suffice to say 80 perecent of you wouldnt know what the key demo is if it bit you all in the ass

The Fox News stuff is comical, do all you liberal fools ever stop to ponder what is going to happen with Keeefys girl Hillary Clinton gets elected president? What is there going to be to talk about? Where will the scandals be supressed there, cause you know the scandals will come

I love it, having worked in tv for 20 years, I love to read idiots in here talk about the Key Demo as if they know what it means.

186kps wrote, brilliantly

If Olbermann gets some numbers let him have em...but with all the free press, pimping, primping and injecting him into NFL game coverage who's surprised at the numbers boost.

It's just hysterical to see the left create a hero out of a guy who is so transparent and void of any critical thinking and analysis.

Olbermann has NEVER EVER had one guest on that would challenge his Media Matter talking points.

Olbermann has the balls (or lack of) to throw stones at;
Katie Couric
Bill O'Reilly
Sean Hannity
Anderson Cooper

but guess what... while all of the above were over in Iraq (Cooper is now) Olbermann sits at home wiping CRISCO off his MLB bobble head dolls.

If people want to watch Olbermann thats great but don't for one second insult me with the "Olbermann is a journalist crap"!

Whats so ironic is Oblbermann has been relentless in his Fox News attacks as a "front" for conservatives and the white house when in fact Olbermann himself is perhaps the biggest front in news history for an "Anchorman/Journalist". Ron Burgundy would be proud.

This guy gets it, idiots Like Mike would never respond to a posting like this because they arent smart enough to, this summs it up perfectly

As if we already didn't know that Odormann was viciously anti American.

My, my. So detached from reality are Conservatives.....

"Maybe, just maybe the idea of adding Keith Olbermann to the NFL on NBC roster is paying off for his MSNBC show. Countdown was the number one show in all of cable news Friday night, in the 25-54 demo (live+ same day DVR). Olbermann's Friday night win comes after his Thursday night appearance during halftime of the Saints-Colts game. An estimated 16.5 million viewers (18-49) watched the game.

>More: an NBC insider adds the big story here is that this is the first time Olbermann has beaten O'Reilly, not a substitute host, in the key demo. The insider adds, "KO has been trending in that direction for weeks."

Winning the 'key demo' means $$$$. You've been working in TV, what, getting my coffee for 20 years?

"do all you liberal fools ever stop to ponder what is going to happen with Keeefys girl Hillary Clinton gets elected president? What is there going to be to talk about?"

Who cares? We FINALLY will be rid of the chimp in the White House. Unfortunately, we'll be dealing with the national tragedy he has created for many, many years to come.

What's so hard for Conservatives to understand about Fox pandering to their fears and prejudices in order to cement their loyalty to a specific political party? You're getting played for *suckers*. Note that I'm not calling you bigots, or homophobes, or religiously intolerant....I'm calling you *suckers*, because that's what you are.

You know, as a Liberal, were I to move to a Red state and start my own church, and wrap myself in the flag, and put up a monument to the ten commandments on my lawn....half of you would automatically vote for me, even though I was scamming you. You know, like your current corrupt, perverted representatives in Congress did.

What's so hard for Conservatives to understand about Fox pandering to their fears and prejudices in order to cement their loyalty to a specific political party? You're getting played for *suckers*. Note that I'm not calling you bigots, or homophobes, or religiously intolerant....I'm calling you *suckers*, because that's what you are.

You know, as a Liberal, were I to move to a Red state and start my own church, and wrap myself in the flag, and put up a monument to the ten commandments on my lawn....half of you would automatically vote for me, even though I was scamming you. You know, like your current corrupt, perverted representatives in Congress did.

And we don't HATE Bush, Fox or Conservatives. We keep trying to get you to wake the f&*(k up. The general liberal view of you folks has actually slid from disdain to pity over the last year or so.

Pitiable suckers...good luck at the polls next November. You're going to need it.

"this guy gets it (what guy?), idiots like Mike would never respond to a posting like this because they arent (sp) smart enough to, this summs (sp) it up perfectly."

"Idiots" like Mike don't resond to posts like that because they read like they were written by a second grader.

More people have seen Olberdouche call himself anti American on this site than who actually watched "Countdown to no ratings."

And his ratings are up! Hurray for Keith! Give the conservobots and their jesus-weasels hell.

Hope to see more of Keith...I know the rest of America is too.

And...you know what? I think we've had just about enough of hearing that we're somehow 'unpatriotic' from the crowd that's looted the treasury thinking that greed is a Jesus-approved virtue, and then gotten us in to an intractable war that we didn't need to get in to in the first place.

Oh, and FANTASTIC job your party did protecting the country on 9/11. Great work. Way to keep your eye on the ball.

Thinking Bush is a moron, surrounded by kool-aid drinking ideologues isn't really that far out in left field. As a matter of fact, it's pretty much world-wide consensus at this point.

Hey Blinddemocrat
Maybe Bush listened to his CIA Director son

The Tenet letter declassified CIA reporting on weapons of mass destruction and Iraq's links to al Qaeda. Two sentences on WMD garnered most media attention, but the intelligence chief's comments on al Qaeda deserved notice. "We have solid reporting of senior level contacts between Iraq and al Qa'ida going back a decade," Tenet wrote. "Credible information indicates that Iraq and al Qa'ida have discussed safe haven and reciprocal non-aggression. Since Operation Enduring Freedom [in Afghanistan], we have solid evidence of the presence in Iraq of al Qa'ida members, including some that have been in Baghdad. We have credible reporting that al Qa'ida leaders sought contacts in Iraq who could help them acquire WMD capabilities. The reporting also stated that Iraq has provided training to al Qa'ida members in the areas of poisons and gases and making conventional bombs." In sum, the letter said, "Iraq's increasing support to extremist Palestinians, coupled with

growing indications of a relationship with al Qa'ida, suggest that Baghdad's links to terrorists will increase, even absent US military actions."

The Factor, even vicious America haters like broadsword know what you said is the truth, problem is to them facts are to be ignored. It's how they feeeeeeeel that's important.

WHAT THE GOVERNMENT HAS LEARNED SINCE THE WAR
THE ADMINISTRATION'S CRITICS, including several of the Democratic presidential candidates, have alluded to new "evidence" they say confirms Iraq and al Qaeda had no relationship before the war. They have not shared that evidence.

Even as the critics withhold the basis for their allegations, evidence on the other side is piling up. Ansar al-Islam--the al Qaeda cell formed in June 2001 that operated out of northern Iraq before the war, notably attacking Kurdish enemies of Saddam--has stepped up its activities elsewhere in the country. In some cases, say national security officials, Ansar is joining with remnants of Saddam's regime to attack Americans and nongovernmental organizations working in Iraq. There is some reporting, unconfirmed at this point, that the recent bombing of the U.N. headquarters was the result of a joint operation between Baathists and Ansar al-Islam.

And there are reports of more direct links between the Iraqi regime and bin Laden. Farouk Hijazi, former Iraqi ambassador to Turkey and Saddam's longtime outreach agent to Islamic fundamentalists, has been captured. In his initial interrogations, Hijazi admitted meeting with senior al Qaeda leaders at Saddam's behest in 1994. According to administration officials familiar with his questioning, he has subsequently admitted additional contacts, including a meeting in late 1997. Hijazi continues to deny that he met with bin Laden on December 21, 1998, to offer the al Qaeda leader safe haven in Iraq. U.S. officials don't believe his denial.

For one thing, the meeting was reported in the press at the time. It also fits a pattern of contacts surrounding Operation Desert Fox, the series of missile strikes the Clinton administration launched at Iraq beginning December 16, 1998. The bombing ended 70 hours later, on December 19, 1998. Administration officials now believe Hijazi left for Afghanistan as the bombing ended and met with bin Laden two days later.

Earlier that year, at another point of increased tension between the United States and Iraq, Hussein sought to step up contacts with al Qaeda. On February 18, 1998, after the Iraqis repeatedly refused to permit U.N. weapons inspectors into sensitive sites, President Bill Clinton went to the Pentagon and delivered a hawkish speech about Hussein's weapons of mass destruction and his links to "an unholy axis of terrorists, drug traffickers, and organized international criminals." Said Clinton: "We have to defend our future from these predators of the 21st century. . . . They will be all the more lethal if we allow them to build arsenals of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them. We simply cannot allow that to happen. There is no more clear example of this threat than Saddam Hussein."

The following day, February 19, 1998, according to documents unearthed in Baghdad after the recent war by journalists Mitch Potter and Inigo Gilmore, Hussein's intelligence service wrote a memo detailing upcoming meetings with a bin Laden representative traveling to Baghdad. Each reference to bin Laden had been covered with Liquid Paper. The memo laid out a plan to step up contacts between Iraq and al Qaeda. The Mukhabarat, one of Saddam's security forces, agreed to pay for "all the travel and hotel costs inside Iraq to gain the knowledge of the message from bin Laden and to convey to his envoy an oral message from us to bin Laden." The document set as the goal for the meeting a discussion of "the future of our relationship with him, bin Laden, and to achieve a direct meeting with him." The al Qaeda representative, the document went on to suggest, might be "a way to maintain contacts with bin Laden."

Factor,

Wow! "Discussed"? "Contacts"? Are you attempting to pretend idiocy, child? Yeah, Al Qaeda was seeking contacts; but, that doesn't mean that they were getting any. That is why the terrorist training camps were in the North part of Iraq where Saddam had no influence...

Nice, impotent try, son...

Liberal Weenie Mike Writes

Who cares? We FINALLY will be rid of the chimp in the White House. Unfortunately, we'll be dealing with the national tragedy he has created for many, many years to come.

the point is, what is your exaulted poohbah gonna do with liberal weenies like you in power? will he combat them the same way he combats AlQueda Fox and the Republican Party

Assface pay attention the name of the site is Olbermann watch, not Liberal weenie who shit in our pants and run around crying woe is us watch

Ha idiot

"Idiots" like Mike don't resond to posts like that because they read like they were written by a second grader

wow, made perfect sense to me, you are just too smart and too intelligent for the rest of us

You remain, the turd monkey that you are

"Who cares? We FINALLY will be rid of the chimp in the White House. Unfortunately, we'll be dealing with the national tragedy he has created for many, many years to come."

you neolibs are already gearing up...the blame game is all you know.

it's easier to place blame on someone else than accept responsibility.

This guy is a scumbag. He never lived anywhere else that’s why he does not understand what’s out there.

From former Soviet Union

Nice, impotent try, son...

Posted by: blindrat at September 11, 2007 1:52 PM

Might want to read the last paragraph again son. I know it is hard. Try sounding out each word as you go.

Want more proof son...

WHAT THE ADMINISTRATION DIDN'T USE
IF THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION had been out to hype the threat from an al Qaeda-Saddam link, it stands to reason that it would have used every shred of incriminating evidence at its disposal. Instead, the administration was restrained in its use of available intelligence. What the Bush administration left out is in some ways as revealing as what it included.

* Iraqi defectors had been saying for years that Saddam's regime trained "non-Iraqi Arab terrorists" at a camp in Salman Pak, south of Baghdad. U.N. inspectors had confirmed the camp's existence, including the presence of a Boeing 707. Defectors say the plane was used to train hijackers; the Iraqi regime said it was used in counterterrorism training. Sabah Khodada, a captain in the Iraqi Army, worked at Salman Pak. In October 2001, he told PBS's "Frontline" about what went on there. "Training is majorly on terrorism. They would be trained on assassinations, kidnapping, hijacking of airplanes, hijacking of buses, public buses, hijacking of trains and all other kinds of operations related to terrorism. . . . All this training is directly toward attacking American targets, and American interests."

But the Bush administration said little about Salman Pak as it demonstrated links between Iraq and al Qaeda. According to administration sources, some detainees who provided credible evidence of other links between Iraq and al Qaeda, including training in terrorism and WMD, insist they have no knowledge of Salman Pak. Khodada, the Iraqi army captain, also professed ignorance of whether the trainees were members of al Qaeda. "Nobody came and told us, 'This is al Qaeda people,'" he explained, "but I know there