Olbermann uses this fake "news show" as his own personal vehicle to get back at people he doesn't like.

Either for political or personal reasons.

It's like a gossip show (mostly) for males.

Imagine if you will "The View" hosted by men.

Question is, is Olbermann Joy Behar or Rosie?

Tough call. He's got a smaller penis than O'Donnell so the best guess is that he's Behar.

Keith Olbermann has got to be the biggest asshole ever to grace the airwaves. I think he is obsessed with bill O. He must be be giving bill O the big suck O every night. He sounds like a spurned lover.

Waterboarding, huh lets see A crazy muslium nut case wants to blow my city off the map. Gee wiz I can probably get the info but I would half to soak his balls in acid. Huh the world would think we were cruel but 1,000,000 people were saved. HuH tough choice. We know what the keith O's of the world would do. Bury 1,000,000. But the world would love us. God I would feel so much better if they were in charge. That evil Bush would save a million but one muslim would have hot nuts. He would not be able to reproduce. what a shame.

It's amazing who Keith Olbermann designates as experts on national security: Rachel Maddow of Air America. Arianna Huffington of Huffington Post. Markos Moulitsas of Daily Kos. I guess sympathizing with terrorists and having contempt for every terror fighting measure qualifies you as a national security expert by Keith Olbermann.

"The View" hosted by men.

A great description of Countdown to no ratings. I wish I came up w/that one.

TDF!!!(*)-----

Did Joachim Von Ribbentrop get habeas corpus rights? Was he water boarded? We know the United States uses this brand of torture. Keith needs to ask these hard questions.

Question is, is Olbermann Joy Behar or Rosie?

Behar!

Rosie had enough sense not to join this lunatic fringe at MSLSD.

Behar, the failed radio host. Would jump at the chance to become the biggest boob at MSLSD.

So Keithie does a whole segment on O'Reilly.

He must see O'Reilly in his sleep at this point.

Even Olbermann is now admitting that Hitlery is sinking like a stone. He still keeps trying to polish a turd.

Is anyone watching Olby with Bill Moyers? He's harping on the fact that MSNBC wants these special comments for ratings, and bragging about how much money he brings the network.

So why all the cuts if he's hauling in the cash? Something doesn't add up.

Guess he feels he's safe with Moyers while he's trying to peddle his book. Where else will he go with this book tour that will fawn over him and not challenge him?

So did Lawrence O'Donnell bash Mormons again?....He admitted recently that he's afraid to criticize Islam because Muslims might kill him but has no problems being a bigot against Mormons because he knows they won't do anything to him...but in KO and O'Donnell's world anyone that has strong Christan beliefs is to be feared while followers of extreme Islam are to be treated with great respect because it's not their fault they fly planes into buildings it's ours.

10:06: "Gee whiz I can probably get the information but I would half to soak his balls in acid. Huh the world would think we're cruel but 1,000,000 people would be saved."

What you just did here is state the wildest and most unlikely hypothetical that you could possibly imagine....and then use THAT particular fantasy as a justification for using barbarism as a matter of policy.

It wasn't exactly an honest argument.

Mlong: "Christians beliefs is to be feared while followers of extreme Islam are to be treated with great respect because it's not their fault they fly planes into buildings it's ours."

You started off your criticism of O'Donnell by making a legitimate and logical point lampooning O'Donnell's apparent compromise of principles in exchange for self preservation, ..... but then you veered WAY off the course of logical thought and honesty when you falsely implied that both he and KO believe it's not the terrorist's fault that they flew planes into buildings.

Well Mike etc, why don't you give us an analysis of KO's logical point about why Sean Hannity has to disclose that he introduced Giuliani at a fund-raiser, but Olby can merrily interview his buddy Kos without ever mentioning that he raised money for the guy?

KO believe it's not the terrorist's fault that they flew planes into buildings.

Posted by: Mike at December 15, 2007 12:08 AM

Tell us, 'mike,' what does KK actually believe, oh clairvoyant one?

Well worth re posting........

Flashback to October 18, when Monkeymann made Sean Hannity "worst person in the world. Why? Because Hannity interviewed Giuliani and didn't mention that he had once introduced him at a fundraiser.

And now here is Edward R Olbermann interviewing Markos Moulitsas. Yeah, so what? The so what is that Krazy Keith did more than introduce Kos to a sycophantic crowd. He actually contributed and helped raise money for Kos. And guess what? Olby failed to disclose that tonight during his blue-dress interview with The Big Kos. Keith Olbermann, Worst Person, but the Very Best Hypocrite, in the World!

posted by J$

Olbermann is a hater and I think he is secretly in love with Bill O'Reilly and is mad because Bill don't go that way. I have been channel surfing and seen Olbermann discussing how "bad" O'Reilly is with only giving minor examples. Dear Olbermann you are a hater and "The worst person in the universe!"

Well Johnny, here are at least 3 reasons:

1) - I don't have a clue what the hypocrisy you alledged regarding the Hannity introduction has to do with my pointing out that Olbermann has never claimed or even implied that it was not the terrorists fault that they flew planes into buildings?

2) - The only thing I know about what you have alledged is what I have read on this blog....and do you REALLY expect me to accept what I read here at face value? Also, why would you think it would be incumbent upon me to defend it anyway?

3) - How many times do I have to AGREE with you that Olbermann IS biased before you stop pretending that I don't think that Olbermann is biased?

While I freely admit that I do like Countdown, I'm NOT deluded enough to claim it is "fair and balanced", the way many of your cohorts keep laughably claiming about Fox.

Now let me ask YOU something. WHEN exactly will you ever allow me to live down my ADMITTED mistake of using multiple names, ..... but mostly very EARLY in my posting days here when I thought almost everyone was doing it? Isn't the FACT that I don't do it now, and have stated my intention NOT to do it any more enough for you to stop ragging me about it with the rather dishonest implication that I am still doing it, .... as in "Mike etc."?

Johnny Dollar, I've got one for you. This bit of hypocrisy by Keith Olbermann is pretty big.

On Monday, Keith's top story was this:

"Our fifth story on the Countdown: breaking on top of that logical disconnect, a resounding refutation of CIA Director Hayden's stated rationale for erasing the tapes. The agent who ledd the team that interrogated Abu Zubaydah... going public tonight -- and calling that interrogation "torture" -- even though General Hayden had insisted the tapes were destroyed to prevent public identification of, and possible reprisals against... that agent, and, and his colleagues."

And then again on Tuesday:

"The same CIA officer who, last night, confirmed that under his team's interrogation, al Qaeda suspect Abu Zubaydah was waterboarded... Who said he has no doubts that waterboarding is torture. Today -- in our fifth story on the Countdown -- completing the picture, saying that the decision to torture... was made by the White House."

But a strange thing happened on Wednesday. Guess which CIA Agent was trashed by Keith:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/22224944#22224944

Rachel Maddow and Huffington Post
Preferred moonbats by Countdown's host
Krazy Keith will annoy
With Zsa Zsa and that boy
Find the loon that leans left the most

Olbermann was featured on Bill Moyers journal this week on PBS.

There's probably gold in those video clips.

LF

The site is called Olbermannwatch dumbass. The lefties want Fox News and everyone on it put to death but they see no problem whatsoever in Olbermann's biases and lies, which are on a far worse scale than anything ever witnessed on Fox News. And why is it that you think you can come here to talk about "politics in the broad sense" but wouldn't dream of doing that at a site devoted to say, coin dealing or music? Your arrogance in attempting to repeatedly hijack threads here with your little pet peeve discussions, usually based on nothing more than the word of some third-rate blogger wearing a tin-foil hat are tiresome at best and ridiculous at their worst. Grow up, face the facts and retreat back to what ever fan blog you came from.

> The only thing I know about what you have alledged is what I have read on this blog

Well whose fault is that. I gave you the link to the transcript where Oralmann rails about the horrible journalistic ethics of a commentator (Hannity) who didn't disclose he once introduced Rudy at a fund-raiser. I gave you the link to the postings where the Kossacks describe how Keith contributed to them. And in fact, just a day or two later, Keith mentioned this on Countdown and ADMITTED that he contributed to them. And you'll find that in the transcript as well.

So the facts are not in dispute, only your reluctance to verify them so you can claim you don't know the facts. Be that as it may, what's preventing you from commenting on the situation as presented, which is not per se about Oralmann's bias--which you admit--but rather his honesty, hypocrisy, and journalistic ethics?

The problem is that KO is not an objective journalist, its one sided and the other side should be condemned to worst than waterboarding. Calling the other side liars,corrupt,racists,bigots,and homophobs. And with the media we have its hard to fight this.

"I'm not politically biased" -Keith Olbermann
"I am politically neutral" -Keith Olbermann

After watching Moyers and Olbermann discuss their points of views, I come away with two words....

"So what."

Going to the PBS blog, this gentleman's observations of Olbermann, Moyers and the rest of the partisan establishment is the same as mine:

"I think at the beginning of the interview Olbermann says it all. A man who sees only black and white where others see a sea of nuances is either a profit or a quack, and Olbermann surely is no profit.

"Limbaugh, Olbermann, only the message is different.

"I hope America, most of it anyway, can quit listening to these far out crazies and come together."

Mark Spencer

http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/blog/2007/12/can_only_screechers_compete_in_1.html

###
This is today's poltical discourse.... entertainment without substance and Moyers plays the game just as well as those on the right.

The problem is the fringe left claims to be above it all, the "elite" fountain of rationalism....the objective truth.....even going so far as claiming to be "mainstream" or "reasonable."

And Moyers gets his salary, partially, from tax dollars....At least Limbaugh and Hannity are supported through the free market.

Thank goodness for OW that continuously proves Mr. Olbermann is no different than the people he chastises in his WPITW.

Give me 5 who you consider "objective" journalists?

###
1) Jim Leher.....does not cover the same topics as Olbermann

2) Tim Russert.....does not cover the same topics as Olbermann

3) Shepherd Smith.....does not cover the same topics as Olbermann

4) Anderson Cooper......does not cover the same topics as Olbermann

5) Mike Wallace.....does not cover the same topics as Olbermann

Ah, the left's other bogeyman, the corporatist.....What does he look like?.....

Just like the evangelical Christian.....and the neocon......THEY'RE COMIN' TO GET YA!

This is why when people on the board like Mr. blank-FLUCKER (cue OLD SPICE jingle) beat their chest, cup their genitalia and say, "I'M NOT AFRAID OF NO DAMN TERRORISTS!" I laugh because in the very next post there will be something like 12:08PM....some fearfilled entry about theocracy, 1st Amendment erosion or the neocons pushing those smelly Jews in Israel to bomb Iran......

Oh well, both extremes need their fear scripts, I suppose.

Hey anon....I'll remember those nasty corporatists as I do my Christmas shopping in fear of that lead tainted toy on the shelf or the guy around the corner who is ready to take me into custody because I look middle-eastern!

Boo!

> Probably never, Mike.

That's the correct answer but to a different question: when will Mike address the issue of Olbermann's proven blatant hypocrisy?

Anon really believes Olbermann covers those issues like Jim Leher....boy I must have missed something....

Sorry anon, Olbermann is a partisan who only interviews other partisans on those topics....so to even suggest he covers the same topics as the fine gentlemen I named is to be utterly deluded.

Olbermann also covers such great issues as Paris Hilton, Britney Spears, cartoons discussing the size of his penis, Harry Potter plot theories and other wonderful stories.

He also has a nightly thing called "Worst Person in The World" which always includes at least one right of center politician, Fox News personality and/or Evangelical Chrisitan.

Let's not forget his "Special Comments" which have predicted great calamity that has not occurred (ie The Surge)

So, anon....keep deluding yourself....Keith Olbermann is not E. Murrow....he has never interviewed a person he has targeted in his opinion pieces like Murrow did nor has he done his own investigative work, like Murrow did. He is not objective, like the men I mentioned, and his topics are simply regurgitated NBC reels with or without a far left of center guest ready to repeat talking points.

And those topics I am ignoring regarding Bush.....I read them among many other stories this morning. I also read about the Democrats basically totally funding Bush's war proposal....a real factual story that says more about reality than those pieces you place out there that are filled with more opinion and conjecture than an hour of COUNTDOWN.

Like I have said since 2006....IF Bush is doing something illegal, he should be impeached......

All I get is silence on that little fact......

Like I have said since 2006.....IF Bush's foreign policy is immoral and headed in the wrong direction, the congress should not fund it.....

All I get is silence on that little fact......

Or I get the diversions that never come to anything conclusive as above.

Oh well....Like Moyers and Olbermann producing their CO2 last night on public funded TV, I say.....

"So What"

Oh that reminds me....Hey Mr. blank-FLUCKER (cue OLD SPICE jingle).....did you get to your boys out of Ms. blank-FLUCKER's (cue 'Cause I'm a woman, W-O-M-A-N) testicle lock box after the show last night?

Edelweiss, Edelweiss!

Leher does not cover the same topics, anon....Topics like Spears, genitalia size and Hilton.

One can interpret the request anyway one wants. I simply expanded it to include the fact that Olbermann has never used right-of center guests to analyze the NBC reports he regurgitates, he never does his own investigative journalism AND he takes a lot of time in giving his own opinion (which is a radical leftwing bias) in a nightly segment (WPITW) and in the ever more frequent, long winded and overly emotional (and eventually wrong) "Special Comments."

The other men do not do this. They are objective, professional journalists.

Olbermann is not.

When he imitates E.R. Murrow at the end of his show "GOOD NIGHT AND GOOD LUCK," he shows us all the fraud he is because he has never done ANYTHING even remotely close to Murrow in his career.

That is why I sometimes end my wonderfully informative posts with the same derisive, "I am cee, good night and good luck."

So, try using facts and rational thought here, anon (and a little good humor wouldn't hurt either)...It would improve your image.

Now let me ask YOU something. WHEN exactly will you ever allow me to live down my ADMITTED mistake of using multiple names, ..... but mostly very EARLY in my posting days here when I thought almost everyone was doing it? Isn't the FACT that I don't do it now, and have stated my intention NOT to do it any more enough for you to stop ragging me about it with the rather dishonest implication that I am still doing it, .... as in "Mike etc."?

Posted by: Mike at December 15, 2007 1:43 AM

as opposed to the hideous sin of jokingly "NAMEJACKING" once?

Let me ask YOU something Mike, why the hell do you care what these assholes think?
They're not your friends, they're not even civil human beings.
Their priorities in life are shameless and they don't give a whit about our country.
Besides, with people like RK and Cecelia, what ELSE are they going to rant about?
How bad their president or party is ?
Olbermann's hair ?

They hate Olbermann for telling people the truth on national TV, they hate us for not being on THEIR side.

They represent the people that have divided this country in half.
Why do you feel such a need for them to like you ?
Think about it .

Posted by: at December 15, 2007 11:03 AM
spoken with delusions of grandeur and hints of growing psychosis

I have noticed recently that several others out here (McCool, Cecelia and others) have posted anonymously by accident. Then a second later the next post says something like "That one was me" with their name attached.

One wonders why someone who posts hundreds of posts a month out here doesn't click the REMEMBER ME button.
Or, maybe they do and then have to unclick it for some reason. This has happened several times recently.

I'm no super-cool webmaster with IP address access, but the only conclusion I can draw is that maybe some of these people also post under multiple names. Of course I have no proof, and I'll be the first to admit it. I also don't expect J$ to rat out his buddies the same way he is so willing to do it to everyone else. Pure hypocrisy.

Posted by: Wasted Keystrokes at December 15, 2007 12:37 PM
Ok, I'm not the most computer literate person out there and I don't type as fast as i think but what the hell kind of conspiracy crap is this? I will tell you exactly what I think of you delusional liberal Keith defender types. If I forget my name, well chalk that up to another hideous sin right after "NAMEJACKING..JACKING....JACKING." Sounds more menacing when it echos.
Other than that, work your way up the 12 steps of whatever program you have obviously been neglecting to attend.

Is that you, PATSY?

McCool: "Spoken with delusions of grandeur and hints of growing psychosis"

I'm starting to see a pattern with you McCool: EVERYBODY who disagrees with you, regardless of how eloquately, respectfully, OR crudely they make their point.....are labeled with similar degrading phrases implying elitism, un-Americanism, or outright mental illness,

On the other hand, EVERYBODY who agrees with you, regardless of how eloquately, respectfully, OR crudely they make their point.....brings out a hand slapping high five from you.

This seems to be fairly typical of right wing followers.

There is another term for what you do, but you don't like that word. To you, correct application of that particular term ALSO smacks of elitism to you.

McCool: "As opposed to the hideous sin of jokingly 'NAMEJACKING" once?"

The "hideous sin" part of it was how you took on my identity in the middle of an ongoing discussion and then used it to impugn my lifestyle in the process. YOU call that 'joking'...I call that dishonest sleaze.

The "hideous sin" part of it was how you have an undeniable very RECENT record of showing your REAL self with your numerous raunchy comments that have even stooped so low as to include death wishes, .... and corpse desecretion fantasies.

The "hideous sin" part of it is how you have even been asked by more some of the more articulate posters on your OWN side to please tone it down.

And the most "hideous" part of it all is that you apparently feel no shame about any of this!

And yet you wonder why so many people on this blog on BOTH sides either summarily dismiss your opinions, .... or simply shun you entirely on the rare occasions that you choose to try to act like a human being, instead of a peddler of internet sleaze?

"This seems to be fairly typical of right wing followers."

I regret making this statement. McCool, along with his penchant for raunchy personal attacks, is NOT really typical of right wingers at all.

Only the bottom 10% of them!

There is another term for what you do, but you don't like that word. To you, correct application of that particular term ALSO smacks of elitism to you.

Yes I made it to elitism!! I'm going to register as a democrat now.

"This seems to be fairly typical of right wing followers."

I regret making this statement. McCool, along with his penchant for raunchy personal attacks, is NOT really typical of right wingers at all.

Only the bottom 10% of them!

Posted by: Mike at December 15, 2007 3:41 PM

It's official! I AM the Heart of Darkness in Mike's life.

There is another term for what you do, but you don't like that word. To you, correct application of that particular term ALSO smacks of elitism to you.

Or i'm just pushing back in protest after years of political correctness in the media and govt gone awry. Or i could just be a Mike wannabe with narcissistic rage complex. Either way.

J$: "When will Mike addres the issue of Olbermann's blatant hypocrisy."

As soon as we regain an administration that makes the relative sins of "Olbermann's blatant hypocrisy" seem tame by comparison.

J$: "When will Mike addres the issue of Olbermann's blatant hypocrisy."

As soon as we regain an administration that makes the relative sins of "Olbermann's blatant hypocrisy" seem tame by comparison.

Posted by: Mike at December 15, 2007 3:50 PM

YES! Out comes the hyperbole. Bush=Evil
Relative sins of Olby = Gray area

instead of a peddler of internet sleaze?

Mike, just give me your credit card # and we can work this whole thing out. Ive got some naked pics of Britney to send to you.
What an oratorical wizard you are!

'YES! Out comes the hyperbole. Bush+Evil
Relative sins of Olby = Gray area"

One happens to be the President of The United States...The other is only a Cable TV News commentator that you don't even have to watch.

Compare that to your own irrational belief of "MSM = EVIL!"

Rush Limbaugh has taught you well!

McCool" "I've got some naked pictures of Britney to send you."

I don't doubt that for an instant.

I also don't doubt that you couldn't be trusted with someone else's credit card number.

Just keep this in mind ethan mattix. When the lights go out, you’re the kind of little fuck we Progressives will go after. You had better understand that perfectly clear. You Republican fucks have disgraced everything that is good is our country and you WILL NOT get away with it.

MSM= irresponsible NOT evil Mike

I cant stand Rush. He's over the top like you.

One happens to be the ELECTED President of The United States... a point you seem to forget

The other is only a Cable TV News commentator that you don't even have to watch. I rarely watch, only when nothing good is on Comedy Central.

Just keep this in mind ethan mattix. When the lights go out, you’re the kind of little fuck we Progressives will go after. You had better understand that perfectly clear. You Republican fucks have disgraced everything that is good is our country and you WILL NOT get away with it.

Posted by: at December 15, 2007 4:08 PM

Thats pretty tough sounding for a piss ant little weasel. Maybe one world govt under the incorruptable UN will make things better.

Colbert is usually funny, I can laugh at myself. Stewart is just an overdone has been. I know that wouldnt fly in liberal land of one talking point and no dissent.

Fuck you McCool. Just go and suck shit our of your buddy, Limbaugh’s asshole and say, “that’s where is get my facts”.

"One happens to be the ELECTED president of the United States."

And the other one happens to be a CHOSEN political commentator that some of us feel has finally fulfilled a previously vacant, but sorely needed role of a national pulpit to call this particular ELECTED president on some of his many instances of lies, hypocrisy, politicization of virtually everything, and, of course it's legendary secrecy.

THAT is what you REALLY hate!....The real mystery is why?

Later!

Fuck you McCool. Just go and suck shit out of your buddy, Limbaugh’s asshole and say, “that’s where is get my facts”.

Fuck you McCool. Just go and suck shit out of your buddy, Limbaugh’s asshole and say, “that’s where is get my facts”.

When the lights go out, you’re the kind of little fuck we Progressives will go after. You had better understand that perfectly clear

Where was I? Oh yeah, over the top hyperbole? I don't know if I should put on a chastity belt for some vague impending sodomization if a democrat becomes President or if I should look into ANTI ACLU lawsuit insurance.

And the other one happens to be a CHOSEN political commentator that some of us feel has finally fulfilled a previously vacant, but sorely needed role of a national pulpit to call this particular ELECTED president on some of his many instances of lies, hypocrisy, politicization of virtually everything, and, of course it's legendary secrecy.

THAT is what you REALLY hate!....The real mystery is why?

Later!
Yeah, no presidency has ever been THIS secretive!! or could it be the media has just become hyper active with the internet explosion and now DEMANDS mroe access to everything. I wonder how Hillary would operate her Whisperdome 5000.

Fuck you McCool. Just go and suck shit out of your buddy, Limbaugh’s asshole and say, “that’s where is get my facts”.

The voice of reason speaks!

McCool" "Maybe one world government under the incorruptable UN would make things better."

I see you've FINALLY gotten into one your conspiracy theories.

The really hillarious thing is that the only other person I know who lives in irrational fear of this "One World Government" also happens to be a 911 conspiracy believer, a Bush hater....as someone who fervently believes that Bush is an integral part of the so called "One World Government" conspiracy.

You're in good company McCool!

McCool: "The voice of reason speaks"

OR...the voice of McCool spoke using his anon alter ego.

I would bet on the latter!

McCool" "Maybe one world government under the incorruptable UN would make things better."

I see you've FINALLY gotten into one your conspiracy theories.

The really hillarious thing is that the only other person I know who lives in irrational fear of this "One World Government" also happens to be a 911 conspiracy believer, a Bush hater....as someone who fervently believes that Bush is an integral part of the so called "One World Government" conspiracy.

You're in good company McCool!

Posted by: Mike at December 15, 2007

I dont fear a one world govt. Thats the ideal situation with no war. But under this UN? corrupt obstructionist UNACCOUNTABLE body that it is with totalitarian terrorist states sitting on Human Rights Committees? give me a break. Democracy must come first to these lands before we should trust our sovereignty to these boobs. as to another talking point of mine, the back door attempt at the one world govt with the Gore hysteria.

McCool: "The voice of reason speaks"

OR...the voice of McCool spoke using his anon alter ego.

I would bet on the latter!

Posted by: Mike at December 15, 2007 4:30 PM

Conspiracy theories abound. I dont have TAHT much energy Mike. Thats one of your boys.

Mike, I think I liked it better when we ignored each other. It was a glorious 10 minutes.

Mike, I think I liked it better when we ignored each other. It was a glorious 10 minutes.

And the other one happens to be a CHOSEN political commentator that some of us feel has finally fulfilled a previously vacant, but sorely needed role of a national pulpit to call this particular ELECTED president on some of his many instances of lies, hypocrisy, politicization of virtually everything, and, of course it's legendary secrecy.

THAT is what you REALLY hate!....The real mystery is why?

Later!

Posted by: Mike at December 15, 2007 4:18 PM

All the while, spewing his own lies and hypocrisies. Oh, yea, there was SUUUUUCH a need for that!

He has hosted the Academy Awards, had a social studies parody book, America (the Book) published in 2004 that languished on best-seller lists for months. He has twice earned the prestigious Peabody award for excellence in radio/television broadcasting and cable television and won the Emmy for the best Variety, Music or Comedy Series in 2006.

posted by why/wikipedia

Stewart and Olbermann are, respectively, a comedian and a failed sports reporter. This is who the left relies upon to get their talking points. It explains much.

Stewart is just an overdone has been. I know that wouldnt fly in liberal land of one talking point and no dissent.
Posted by: McCool at December 15, 2007 4:15 PM

Has been ?
He has hosted the Academy Awards, had a social studies parody book, America (the Book) published in 2004 that languished on best-seller lists for months. He has twice earned the prestigious Peabody award for excellence in radio/television broadcasting and cable television and won the Emmy for the best Variety, Music or Comedy Series in 2006.

Plus he is well respected by both the right and the left as being extremely intelligent, funny and fair.( Check his guest list)

What's your definition of a "has been" ?
If he's a "has been" how would you categorize yourself ?

TDF

Care to retract your stupid statement ?

Posted by: Why Don't You Learn Something at December 15, 2007 6:02 PM

Yeah maybe you and i could roll some ganja and make peace huh? I'm entitled to my opinion about Stewart, he's not as funny as Colbert. You just keep trying to ram your opinion of comedy down my throat. Sounds a lot like our previous discussion about university history professors.

I know that wouldnt fly in liberal land of one talking point and no dissent

Like I was saying professor.....

Sad Really wrote: “Stewart and Olbermann are, respectively, a comedian and a failed sports reporter. This is who the left relies upon to get their talking points. It explains much.”

Sad Really, You’re projecting you own inadequacies when you attack Jon Stewart and Keith Olbermann. You are a filthy Republican flying monkey who can’t stand someone speaking truth to power using BIG words.

Sad Really, You’re projecting you own inadequacies when you attack Jon Stewart and Keith Olbermann. You are a filthy Republican flying monkey who can’t stand someone speaking truth to power using BIG words.

Posted by: at December 16, 2007 12:26 PM

Flying monkeys? That makes olby the Wizard? Hillary Wicked Witch of the East.

There are only a few people from the right or left that doesn't find Stewart funny.
My guess is that when he makes them and their president look like the fools that they most definitely are...it hits too close to home and they can't laugh at themselves.
That's OK...There's enough people laughing AT them to make up for it.
TDF.

Posted by: Why Don't You Think at December 16, 2007 1:25 PM

OR, he's been around too long doing the same exact thing from the same exact angle andit gets old.. Enough about THAT dope smoking pundit. Lets talk about you!

Failed sportscaster?
Is it because you just don't know any better or that you're just a sheep and love to follow the herd at this site?
Either way...you don't know your ass from a hole in the ground.

Posted by: Why Don't You Think at December 16, 2007 1:30 PM

Again, another mildly humorous hack who wore out his welcome with the same old tired act. Sometimes it takes the public a little time to hold these douches as self evident.

Failed sportscaster?
Is it because you just don't know any better or that you're just a sheep and love to follow the herd at this site?
Either way...you don't know your ass from a hole in the ground.

Posted by: Why Don't You Think at December 16, 2007 1:30 PM

Again, another mildly humorous hack who wore out his welcome with the same old tired act. Sometimes it takes the public a little time to hold these douches as self evident.

So we have two right wing dopes who say that Stewart is a "has been" and Olbermann is a "failed sportscaster".
Yet both have won an amazing amount of awards and reach the pinnacle of their respected professions.

We should all be such failures !

Posted by: Why Don't You Think at December 16, 2007 1:34 PM

Pinnacle? Stewart Maybe. Olby? give me a break. I knew this farmer, he won awards as the best shit shoveler 6 years ina row. Doesn't make him a brain surgeon. By the way I believe Olby has recaptured the shit shoveler award.

Check out part of olby's bio at 1:30.

It's a bitter pill for you Olbyhaters to swallow but he was a huge success as a sportscaster.

As usual, you got nothing.

Posted by: Why Don't You Think at December 16, 2007 1:47 PM

I guess I'd rather swallow th ebitter pill of disregard for his accomplishments. I wonder what part of him you have been swallowing. You sound like a teenage girl groupie. I know he was a better sportscaster than newscaster or opinion spinner or whatever it is called today, it was lighter and he could do relatively little harm there. I am all for him going back to sportscaster.

I am all for him going back to sportscaster.
Posted by: McCool at December 16, 2007 1:53 PM

You and all the other right wingers at this site.
They all HATE that he tells it like it is about your party and president.
I'd hate it too if I was a truth denying RW unamerican RWer !

Posted by: Why Don't You Think at December 16, 2007 1:57 PM

NOW you sound like youre age regressing. You sound like a little girl now repeating the same little mantra over and over, almost Pavlovian. RWer RWer.

How then would you like to be referred to?
That nutcase that is on the same level as Puck...or just maybe the near sighted republican who can't see the nose on his own face?

Now THATS the pot calling the kettle black. Except the smoke is obscuring your view of your nose. Myopic indeed.
And on an unrelated note, how many hemp sweaters do you own?

http://ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=282528955224615

Good article for YOU to read WHY

The always astute Miss Arianna Huffington's Sunday roundup:

This was a week for might-have-beens and paths-not-taken. Al Gore accepted the Nobel Prize, reminding us that America's loss was Mother Earth's gain. President Bush stood in the White House and told ABC: "I doubt I'd be standing here if I hadn't quit drinking whiskey." Sobriety's gain was America's loss. And Bill Clinton told an Iowa crowd that when they were first dating, he advised Hillary to dump him. I wonder if Ron Burkle gave the same advice to Bill

Thank God Gore didn't win and I made the mistake of voting for him. He is a charlatan and so is his scam.

http://ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=282528766258350
Speaking of Gore...

From the above article:
The driving force of the environmental movement is not a cleaner planet — or a world that doesn't get too hot, in the case of the global warming issue — but a leftist, egalitarian urge to redistribute wealth. A CO2 tax does this and more, choking economic growth in the U.S. and punishing Americans for being the voracious consumers that we are.

Eco-activists have been so successful in distracting the public from their real intentions that they're becoming less guarded in discussing their ultimate goal.

http://www.numberwatch.co.uk/religion.htm

Another good article - Climate change as the new religion

I believe I cited the above article for the vision impaired.
And while you are at it, read that article about this as teh new religion. Speaking of that, even the Pope of all people came out against Gore's nonsense and the rush to judgement. Have you read any other articles other than those spewed out by Gore, the politician edited IPCC, or MSNBC? It COULD be possible that the SUN, the big Hydrogen gas ball that powers the WHOLE solar system MIGHT have more of an impact on our weather than the small % of CO2 that man contributes to the miniscule percentage that CO2 is in our atmosphere. have you heard of solar wind? It has quite an effect on cloud formation in the atmosphere and it VARIES with solar activity. Just follow the pied piper and he will lead us to economic oblivion for whatthey admit is a 0.04 Degree Celsius reduction in temperature over the next century. Possibly trillions of dollars for that? and this is typical of the left thinking they have control over everything. W ecan manage the environment, how arrogant.

From today's OW:

This was a particularly repellent smear, as Fat Ass took a joke line from O'Reilly and soberly portrayed it as "defending Nazi murderers".

And the best part: Bathtub Boy made an error!

When KO claimed that BOR misspoke when he said the Nazi's name was von Rippentrop in the recent WPITW, KO was wrong!

Check out this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki /Joachim_von_Ribbentrop

He went by the name von Rippentrop, but was born Rippentrop

I wonder if Keith will apologize to Bill?

www.junkscience.com

Try to read with an open mind.

I just made myself laugh.

Olbyloon Ed 101
Student: why/some 50 others
Subject: 'Global warming'

Just a snippet:

The numbers of scientist reviewers involved in WG I is actually less than a quarter of the whole, a little over 600 in total. The other 1,900 reviewers assessed the other working group reports. They had nothing to say about the causes of climate change or its future trajectory. Still, 600 “scientific expert reviewers” sounds pretty impressive. After all, they submitted their comments to the IPCC editors who assure us that “all substantive government and expert review comments received appropriate consideration.” And since these experts reviewers are all listed in Annex III of the report, they must have endorsed it, right?

Wrong.

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/968

Most of the science community is in agreement on this issue...or maybe you haven't noticed reading sites like Junkscience.com

And everyone was in agreement that an ice age was looming in the 70s.

One final thought on global warming...how anyone can believe that the billions of pounds of co2 that man puts in our atmosphere from every corner of the globe each and every day and think it WOULDN'T affect the natural balance of our planet...is beyond belief.

It's funny that if you're right wing you MUST be a global warming denier.
Why is that ?
Right wing dogma over science.
Party over country...and now even party over the health of our planet.
Lucky we have much smarter and less biased people in other countries leading the way on this issue.
No matter who is elected president in 08' there will be a 100 % turn around on this issue after the embarrassing years of 2000-2008.....that has cost us valuable and precious time.

Posted by: Why Don't You Think at December 16, 2007 3:14 PM

Thats part of the problem. What is the natural balance? What was the natural balance when the climate fluctuated before industrialization or before homo sapiens? I believed in global warming until I read more on the issue. The first thing that worried me was the impending coolapse of the thermal haline cycle in the gulf stream in the 90s. Sounded plausble to me at the time. I feared for my children. Then it was oops we were wrong about THAT but then theres THIS. EVERYTHINg is blamed on global warming, or should i say climate change because now extreme cold weather is also now blamed on increasing carbon.

Right wing dogma over science.
Pot calling the kettle black again. whos folowing the dogma?

Lucky we have much smarter and less biased people in other countries leading the way on this issue.
OH yes, the Euros have shown such incredible friggin judgement in the past on everything from war to carbon counting. Typical Degradation of Americans by an American liberal. Chirac thinks its correct tehrefore I do.

No matter who is elected president in 08' there will be a 100 % turn around on this issue after the embarrassing years of 2000-2008.....that has cost us valuable and precious time.

Yeah precious time to wreck the economy, hinder development in the developing world all for the sake of 0.04 degrees Celsius. That makes sense to me!

And don't even consider the possibility that some of these proponents are corrupt all for their own reasons.

We'll see in 5 to 10 years. I hope you remember your level of indignation.

''This is the beginning, not the end,'' U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, who made a plea here for action, later told The Associated Press. ''We will have to engage in more complex, long and difficult negotiations.

Posted by: Why Don't You Think at December 16, 2007 3:22 PM

OH THE UN? An even BETTER record of good decision making than the Euros. Well then, we better do what THEY think, after all, not EVERYONE in the general assembly hates the US.

Yeah precious time to wreck the economy, hinder development in the developing world all for the sake of 0.04 degrees Celsius. That makes sense to me!"

Excuse me! Stupid FUCK!

Developing new technologies to re-use what once was considered waste, developing new technologies to stop producing poison that will last for decades, even centuries, developing new technologies that demand more efficient and cheaper goods... doesn't make sense to you, STUPID FUCK?

You must be posting using a typewriter.

Posted by: How can you so fucking inept? at December 16, 2007 3:43 PM

How spectacularly idealistic of you. Unfortunately most of those technologies are ready for cost effective implementation for poor countries.

Un couldn't even manage Oil for Food, but lets let them decide the best climate. L ike it doesnt fluctuate naturally

The numbers of scientist reviewers involved in WG I is actually less than a quarter of the whole

crickets..........

First of all,,NOT doing anything about climate change will create more disasters than we've ever seen. You don't thinking massive flooding and droughts, food shortages etc. throughout the world won't affect nation's economies ?
Why don't you think ?

I've personally seen how the drier summers is taking its toll on the farmers of South Jersey.Each summer we get less rainfall which raises prices and...ahem...hurts the economy.

Oh, YOU'VE seen well then. Unfortunately climate fluctuates over time frames larger than YOUR lifetime. Its all happened before and guess what, it will all happen again.

Developing automobiles with better fuel efficiency is not only the sane environmental approach it would save us money at the pumps.

I agree with this point only because it will ween us off the mideast assholes

There lies your ignorance. Every major industrial country in the world is on board with having an urgency to reduce co2 levels except...you guessed it?...The United States lead by you know who !
More embarassment brought on by your republican president...especially since the United States is the leading producer of co2.

Think back
Oh wait, i am thinking back, to 1997, Kyoto. Clinton AND Gore do not present the treaty to Congress for 4 years because they knew it wouldnt pass. All GW 's fault huh?

Think back to HS science class and the discussions of the importance of the food chain..how one species affects the others.We already have limits of the amount of tuna and other fish we can eat because of high mercury levels..caused by coal producing plants and other pollution factors.
That topic in itself is another disgrace of what the Bush administration has done in this area...but that's another topic for another time.

Another fatal flaw - WITH prosperity comes a cleaner environment because the people can afford it. Carbon cap trading, bullshit scheme that it is to create entities/companies to trade in an atmospheric gas will hinder economic development in the developing world. Those 2 BILLION people in China and India as well as Brazil whose economies are growing like crazy

The global warming deniers ( mostly right wingers) want to run our planet right into the ground....leaving our grandchildren and great grand children asking us the question in 30 years...."Why didn't you do something about it, when all the evidence was right in front of your face?"

YOU would like to take a wait and see attitude while many scientists are already saying we may have reached the point of no return.

Yeah, the scientists have NEVER been wrong, world is flat, Earth is the center of the universe. Scientists big argument is Doom is impending, years down the road, we just cant see it yet, its coming. Just the latest in a series of doomsday cults the world has witnessed through the years.

Thank God NO ONE is listening to you and your ilk.

YOU are a blithering pavlov dog idiot who is following asshole politicians at the UN and an asshole (Gore) with a slightly insane messiah complex.

Mrs. Philby, what ever you do, DO NOT give any credit to the Iraqis.........

and proof that a change in political leadership CAN, SOMETIMES make a difference. I envy them.

Posted by: A N O N Y M O U S at December 16, 2007 5:56 PM

I don't see Iraq anywhere.

keep reading brainfart
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2007/12/16/inconvenient-truths-bali-climate-meeting-us-media-must-ignore

and this

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2007/12/16/bolton-bashes-gores-bali-buffoonery

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2007/12/15/manic-misinterpretations-us-capitulation-climate-change-bali

and this. notice the title of the article?

some good points in all 3
By the way, What the hell is wrong with you???? Seriously. Those brain cells never grow back do they WHY.

Like I said, the world is moving forward leaving jackasses like yourself in the dust.

Yep, just like a blindfolded drunk in a big expensive car.

I think Keith is going to kick you out of the crazyass Keithlovers Club for your gross incompetence.

NEWSBUSTERS!!
So I 'm not even going to read it!!!

IGNORANCE IS BLISS

WHY IS VERY HAPPY

http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1695145,00.html

http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5hSIPHFtqSzFk7ZCDG9dZKmdlHAMQ

OK, I'll spoonfeed it to you. These were links from the newsbusters article. Time? Thats sufficiently liberal right?

Canadian Press? canadians are liberal right?
Read those instead if the smoke in front of the screen clears up a little

Ok that was my last anti gore rant. These people probably want to focus on the olbercolon

The numbers of scientist reviewers involved in WG I is actually less than a quarter of the whole

more crickeys........'why' won't touch it!

You are hopelessly neck deep into Gore's rectum

The way ahead from Bali is difficult,” Gore said. “The truth is that is the maximum now considered possible even here in this conference is still far short of the minimum that will really solve this process. So we have to expand the limits of what’s possible. We must have the moral imagination of humankind to see ourselves as the symbol of global civilisation.”

Like I said insane Messiah complex

http://www.csccc.info/page-creator.php?pid=33

How Kyoto/Bali doesnt help the worlds poor

http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=164002
Open letter to Secy Genl of UN refuting claims of Gore/IPCC

http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=164004
Huge list of relevant scientists who signed the above letter

The numbers of scientist reviewers involved in WG I is actually less than a quarter of the whole

more crickeys........'why' won't touch it!

More crickeys!

TFF! (*)------

Yep.
Bush lies but Gore would NEVER lie!!!!

He didnt respond to my articles either, thats odd. hes an imbecile. Maybe Touch of Gray got sidetracked rolling one.

'why' won't be posting on this thread for a while. He has his hands over his eyes with his lips on the bong.......He can't deal with the fact only 1/4 of the scientists back algore.

"Bush lies but Gore would never lie."

Well, when the president of the United States sets the bar of honestly so low, why in the world would you expect truth from anyone else?

Ive resigned myself to just bitchslapping him silly. My hand hurts I had to so it so many times! He or Mike will accuse me of being an alter ego for you or something.

"Bush lies but Gore would never lie."

Well, when the president of the United States sets the bar of honestly so low, why in the world would you expect truth from anyone else?

Posted by: Mike at December 16, 2007 10:02 PM

yeah and if he did lie about anything, he'd be the first president to do that wouldn't he Mike? rewind 1998

"The number of scientist reviewers involved in WG 1 is actually less than a quarter of the whole."

This sounds like the same kind of logic that the turrettes inflicted poster sometimes known as royal king used to claim that the other 99% of the troops simply MUST be rabid war supporters if only 1% signed up as activists on an anti war web site.

This sounds like the same kind of logic that the turrettes inflicted poster sometimes known as royal king used to claim that the other 99% of the troops simply MUST be rabid war supporters if only 1% signed up as activists on an anti war web site.

Thats not very PC Mike. Youre going to have to hand in the ACLU card for that one. Might as well give me the Communist Party card while youre at it

"Might as well give me the Communist Party card while your at it."

Since you're taking part of my collection, you might as well take my American Nazi Party, KKK, and John Birch Society cards too.

Heck....just take em' all!

Mike, Thats just ridiculous. They would have kicked you out years ago for the ponytail

"Mike, Thats just ridiculous. They would have kicked you out years ago for the ponytail"

Which one?....The KKK?....NAACP?....Nazi Party?....Communists?

CAIR

Ok, I'm done my real work and I'm going to bed. Mike, remember Gore's catchphrase, "It's not a lie if you believe it to be true." or was that Clinton? either way.

McCool: "Ok, I'm done my real work and I'm going to bed."

I thought you were gonna "bitchslap" me first?

This sounds like the same kind of logic that the turrettes inflicted poster sometimes known as royal king used to claim that the other 99% of the troops simply MUST be rabid war supporters if only 1% signed up as activists on an anti war web site.

Posted by: Mike at December 16, 2007 10:35 PM

1%? Really? Any proof? It's more like .00001%. Nice try, though.

Just checked your 8:31 post, "why." As usual, you got nothing. Some cut and paste from a website you aren't too proud of because you gave no attribution and it says nothing to rebutt my post in regards to the fact that less than 1/4 of the scientists agree with algore. Nice try, though.

As usual, Johnnie-Jeff, you read only 10% of the article and understood only 5% of the part you read. Go back. Reread. Carefully. It's alright if you move your lips. Then, give us a FULL, COMPLETE and ACCURATE report. You'll be surprised what it does for your self-esteem.

Posted by: A N O N Y M O U S at December 16, 2007 10:14 PM

Ok, Mrs. Philby, correct me if I'm wrong. This should be good!

From the poster sometimes known as royal king @ 1:54 AM:

"Just checked your 8:31 post, "why". As usual you got nothing. Some cut and paste from a website you aren't too proud of"

Why's 8:31 post was not a "cut and paste".

Jeff etc. at 1:49 AM:

"1%? Really? Any proof? It's more like .00001%. Nice try, though."

OK, let's do the math!

If 500 troops represents only .00001% of our military, then Jeff thinks we have a total of 5,000,000,000 troops in our military.

Thats 5 BILLION troops folks!

This would mean that over 75% of the world's population is a US troop.

No wonder Jeff thinks our military can do anything!

Please,
Don't use your faggy anti-american liberal math logic on Royal King. He doesn't like to hear facts very much.

Shame on you.

Ha Mike battleing online in Mommy's trailer at 4:07 in the morning in his underoos smoking up a storm, ha such a loser'

Get a life dewshbag, leave the house and leave your poor mother alone

Ha Mike battleing online in Mommy's trailer at 4:07 in the morning in his underoos smoking up a storm, ha such a loser'

Get a life dewshbag, leave the house and leave your poor mother alone

Posted by: Mike is a turd at December 17, 2007 9:46 AM

LOL Thats funny!

Trent why don't you put on your gray turtleneck, your oh so trendy Eurotrash eyeglasses along with the imported cigarettes and hang out at the local coffee shop while you preach revolution until your next graduate class. Don't forget to stop by and re-up for unemployment.

Nobody @ 9:46 AM:

"Ha Mike battleing online in mommy's trailer at 4:07 in his underoos smoking up a storm, ha such a loser'

"Get a life dewshbag, leave the house and leave your mother alone"

OK Nobody, which is it.....a "house" or a "trailer"?

McCool @ 10:29 AM: "Now that's funny!"

Well, it's NO surprise at all that you'd think that's "funny". It's already well established how much you love ad hominem personal attacks.

In fact, that particular character disorder just MIGHT be what helps make you such a loyal Bushie!

hey, 'mike,' head on over to Soldiers Prospective and tell them you claim that 1% of the troops are cowards, like you. I'll be interested to see Cj's response to you. Also, any proof 'whys' post above wasn't a cut and paste? That's what I thought.

Mrs. Philby, can't back up your 10:14 post? That's what I thought. Did you loons see on the other thread your cohort, patsy, proved you wrong? TDF!!!!

"Hey 'mike', head on over to Soldier's Perspective and tell them that 1% of the troops are cowards, like you."

Why should I do THAT Jeff? Since I've never called ANY of our troops "cowards".

Also, spare me that faux comraderie with CJ. You couldn't shine his shoes. I've bantered with CJ, and unlike YOU, he is a man, not the troll that you are....who is unafraid of making and defending his own arguments....instead of your tactic of scurrying around behind the walls and sniping before disappearing again.

1:34---Obyloon diversion. Can't back her spew, just make an asinine statment.

Still dwelling on the namejacker? Was it you or wasted? Probably you.

Tsk, tsk, tsk.

The real BovineQueen would be bitchin' to Johnny BU$HWIPE to unmask the foul mouthed culprit.

Along with multiple baseless accusations against Mike, "Patsy," Philby, WDYT, Wasted, Trent... just in case.

Wrong, again, patsy. Thanks, again for digging up that old post that proved I never claimed Thompson would win the presidency. Much appreciated.

"Wrong again, patsy. Thanks, again for digging up that old post that proved I never claimed Thompson would win the presidency, Much appreciated."

What part of "he dug up the wrong post" don't you understand?

Trent why don't you put on your gray turtleneck, your oh so trendy Eurotrash eyeglasses along with the imported cigarettes and hang out at the local coffee shop while you preach revolution until your next graduate class. Don't forget to stop by and re-up for unemployment.

Posted by: McCool at December 17, 2007 10:35 AM

hmmm. I don't like turtlenecks, nor eurotrash (nice reference, by the way) eyeglasses. I do, however, like to dress like Howlin' Pelle Almqvist. So, I guess I look a little faggy. Chicks dig it.
I don't smoke. But I do like Stella Artois. Does that count?

What part of "he dug up the wrong post" don't you understand?

Posted by: Mike at December 17, 2007 2:49 PM

Where's the 'right' post? Can't find it?

Patsy, the accusation from the usual lying olbyloons was that I claimed Thompson would 'win' the presidency. Funny, how you are already trying to put a spin on it.

TDF!!!!!!!! Still can't find the post?

Nice back pedal, patsy. Can't find the post, so, spin and divert. Just wave the white flag, already. I won't rub it in, too much.....

patsy, one more shovel full and you will be completely buried, I don't have the heart to do it.

Your only option is to accuse Johnny of deleting the post where I claimed Thompson would win the presidency. LOL!!!!!!TDF!!!!

patsy, your cohort, 'mike', claims you 'dug up the wrong post.' Now, go 'dig up' the right post, which will redeem yourself and your fellow olbyloons from falsly claiming I said, "Thompson will win the presidency." Mrs. Philby claimed she remembers me saying it, no proof. 'mike' claime he remembers me saying it, no proof. Redeem, redeem!

"Now, go 'dig up' the right post, which will redeem yourself and your fellow olbyloons from falsly claiming I said, "Thompson will win the presidency."

It apears you said "When Thompson jumps in it is all over." Now The rest of it knew that it was all over for Fred when he actually did decide to get his lazy ass in the race. but when you said it it was probably your retarded way of making a prediction. Looks about as acurate as anything that comes out of your mouth.

"When Fred Thompson jumps in, it's all over. This debate was hands down 100 times the More Snot Nosed BroadCasters 'attempt' to cover a debate, though. Newt referred to Mathews and Ulbermahn as 'game show hosts' today, laughed my ass off.

Posted by royalking at May 16, 2007 12:38 AM"

Love "the google"

Posted by royalking at May 16, 2007 12:38 AM"

Love "the google"

Posted by: at December 18, 2007 2:02 AM

I believe the argument at hand was I said that "Thompsone would win the presidency." I still don't see it.

"For anyone with even a slight bit of intellectual honesty,"

###
Then why are you discussing it Mrs. Philby, I mean jennifer, I mean _______, I mean A N O N Y M O U S, I mean Mr. blank-FLUCKER (cue OLD SPICE jingle)?.....

Any other names you have hidden behind through the months, years?.....

Genders?

Honesty? Really now....Graeme needs a better role model!

Just ask 'mike.' You're splitting hairs. Then again, he's a huge partisan, so.....

No, Royal King is looking for someone to prove he said, "Thompsone would win the presidency"

See if you get a word out of place RK will say "Ah HA!" I know a mentally challenged seven year old that plays the same game.

Posted by: at December 18, 2007 1:50 PM

One of you cowards made the accusation of what I said. I didn't start the argument, you did. Remember, coward? Your desperation is, clearly, showing. Wha's funny, is, the hours you spent trying to find the post that proves you were wrong, again!

See if you get a word out of place RK will say "Ah HA!" I know a mentally challenged seven year old that plays the same game.

Posted by: at December 18, 2007 1:50 PM

You really shouldn't talk about your relatives that way.

Trent why don't you put on your gray turtleneck, your oh so trendy Eurotrash eyeglasses along with the imported cigarettes and hang out at the local coffee shop while you preach revolution until your next graduate class. Don't forget to stop by and re-up for unemployment.

Posted by: McCool at December 17, 2007 10:35 AM

hmmm. I don't like turtlenecks, nor eurotrash (nice reference, by the way) eyeglasses. I do, however, like to dress like Howlin' Pelle Almqvist. So, I guess I look a little faggy. Chicks dig it.
I don't smoke. But I do like Stella Artois. Does that count?

Posted by: Trent the Anarcho-Syndicalist at December 17, 2007 3:10 PM

Aaahhh, more great material for my screenplay...OlbermannWatch: the movie

No, Royal King is looking for someone to prove he said, "Thompsone would win the presidency"

posted by why/some 75 others

That was the original accusation. I'm sure that means nothing to an olbyloon. It was never proven. You loon are soooo desperate. All I can do is laugh........

"Gotta believe Fred will be the commander and chief"

posted by coward

This is an outright lie. No surprise, considering the source.