When does Olbermann? He specializes in specifically filter left-wing propaganda, not the news.

Who cares about what O'Reilly does?

This is Olbermann Watch! The Number One Olbermann Blog IN THE WORLD!

I must say Allison was looking OUTSTANDING tonight as I surfed on by to the game.

As for covering news, both guys do, it's just Olbermann does it in a vacuum where he can't hear any dissenting voices. O'rly usually either has 2 people to argue, or 1 person for him to argue with. Keith has people that just sit there and nod. Are his opinions too wishy washy to stand up to a little debate? The video on Inside Cable News has him on PBS saying he almost walked off his show rather than air a Michael Savage commentary!

I bet KO's manhood quotient to take on David Gregory will register as limp.

"W]hat I've done on the air in the last 4 1/2 years, and particularly in the last year and a half since the special comments began, is really journalism." Keith Olbermann

For all you loons who say that Keith does not claim to be a "real jounalist". That's news to him.

Oh, and Keith even lied to his hero Bill Moyers.

Did you watch the segment Factor? If he really believes his mission is to save America, why isn't he out doing investigative reporting?

He wants to be one of those heroic journalists who save America from the comfort of his studio.

All it takes is one tune-in to Countdown to see what a farce his mission truly is. No hard hitting interviews or variety of guests. I still remember how he stumbled through his interview with Ashcroft (and still wonder how that came about-there must be a clause in his current contract that guarantees no such event will ever occur again).

The video on Inside Cable News has him on PBS saying he almost walked off his show rather than air a Michael Savage commentary!

Posted by: Great Thanks at December 17, 2007 10:01 PM

Hence, the term, coward.

To: Lefties are clueless

Fuck you

J$, today's limerick was the best! You outdid yourself.

To: royal King

Fuck you

To: Sharon

Fuck you

to infinity and beyond

12:31, 12:33 and 12:35 = typical libnut.

My News Year resolution for 2008 will be:

1. To get laid and hopefully not turn 30 as a virgin.

2. Be able to pay enough on my credit card debt to be bale to get out of debt in 10 years and not just keep up with the interest.

3. Promise to not throw a fit like a five year old every time I pull up to the pump.

4. Venture out of my sandbox farther than I am able to keep one of my big toes dangling over the side, maybe even out of sight.

5. Vow to not hide under my bed every time Harry Reid, Al Gore and Nancy Pelosi tell me too.

6. Give up porn.

7. Go to church.

8. Give to charity.

9. Love thy neighbor.

10. Regsiter and vote for the first time in my life.

Phony Soldier,

I made a promise to come to the defense of some people you are bullying. Your comment of 8:35, using several vulgar expressions, althoug somewhat of a low caliber range for you, especially considering the target is O'Reilly, is adding to your reputation here and not in a positive way. We all know that he spews garbage nearly 100% of the time, but remember your Christian values. I am inclined to give you a pass of the use of the word Olblyf*** considering the myriad number of Pastor Dumbf**** shout outs, but lead by example.

Also, "xcpet maybe that 12:15 to 12:17 time slot for ages 3-5" was a hoot! If you dropped the other junk, maybe there would be less complaints.

8:24 : It is difficult to not become retaliatory in nature, but you were entirely offensive to non-specific people.
***
8:36: Namejacking is just wrong, whoever you are. AAP, you'll have to take it up with the moderator, but I for one am against it.

That should be O'Leilly

> when does KO do stories on body language ?

He doesn't have time. He has to do 14 different varieties of "puppet theater".

j$:

Then Olby or his stooges throw around gay rumors against those who actually are man enough to go to war zones and cover stuff.

Some moonbat spewed: "When does O'Reilly cover news?"

As Bill as has stated many times: The O'Reilly Factor is NOT a NEWS show... it's an OPINION show.

Whereas COUNTDOWN is advertised as "MSNBC's NEWS SHOW OF RECORD" quoted from the Orange One himself.

Got it?

Krazy Keith took another day off
Was it due to a cold or a cough?
No, he's in the tub
Ms. Stewart's the sub
Keith's kareer? Real journalists scoff

But 10:26, I stand accused of being a hypocritical Christian if I let his comments go unchallenged. Maybe there is more to the situation than you think. Maybe somebody plays endless games here.

Another reason your hero Keith is a loser...

Hillary is his candidate and the newest poll:
What candidate would you most oppose to being president...
Hillary gets 40% of the vote
Giuliiani gets 17%

She will not get the mandate becuase the democrats are finally coming to realize that the hack is UNELECTABLE!

AnyoneButHillary in 2008!

^ I don't know. Reading the far left & even center left blogs, you'll find tons of folks that saying will vote repub before Hillary. I am considering it myself, but the only decent repub is McCain.

OK I double-checked the IP just to make sure you really ARE O'Lielly. Maybe the Christmas spirit is getting to you! Anyhow, it is our policy here never to delete messages because they disagree. The whole point of comments is to, well, get comments. I just don't like those massive cut-and-pastes, and the alternative to that is simple: post a link. As for the hounds, when I try to post there it's to point out an error or correct a mistake, but that's apparently too much for them. Anyhow, just watch those cut-and-pastes and you'll be fine over here, no matter how many names you call me!

I'd thought you guys at OW would have caught this:

Keith Olbermann to Bill Moyers:

"I'm on the air with Chris Matthews on that day with miss-- mission accomplished on May 1st in 2003. And I-- and he's talking about this as George Bush's moment in history and this. And I said, "Don't you think that him wearing a flight suit's going to be a little bit of a problem during the election cam-- "No

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2007/12/15/keith-olbermann-what-i-do-really-journalism

______I know it's newsbusters, and may here will dismiss it out of hand, but they do provide the transcripts showing Olbermann never said that to Chris Matthews...

I can think of no reason for Newshounds to delete your posts

posted by O'leilly

I can. It's very simple. They are hypocrites and hacks! Thru and thru.

But the problem is they often don't tell the truth, and don't like it when that's pointed out to them.

"I can think of no reason for Newshounds to delete your posts."

Indeed, one of the best arguments there is in favor of liberalism is to read RK's posts.

Indeed, one of the best arguments there is in favor of liberalism is to read RK's posts.

Posted by: Mike at December 18, 2007 4:04 PM

It comes as no surprise you would defend newsmutts. One and same. The only difference is they have a website and you don't.

"to infinity and beyond
Posted by: Sharon at December 18, 2007 1:08 AM "

You nailed that one, Sharon.

I'm still snickering.

Grammie

Sharon, we have received a message from on high.

It has rained down upon us not once or twice but thrice!

I am humbled that only you were the object of HIS wrath and that I was spared.

You must repent and labor mightily so that you gain both 'charity' and 'humor' to meet those exquisitely exacting standards that are so blatantly displayed here day after day by Monsieur Capon Blank-Flucker.

Grammie