Over the last decade, former President Bill Clinton has raised more than $500 million for his foundation, allowing him to build a glass-and-steel presidential library in Little Rock, Ark., and burnish his image as an impresario of global philanthropy. The foundation has closely guarded the identities of its donors — including one who gave $31.3 million last year.

Now, the secrecy surrounding the William J. Clinton Foundation has become a campaign issue as Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton seeks the Democratic presidential nomination with her husband as a prime source of strategy and star power. Some of her rivals argue that donors could use presidential foundations to circumvent campaign finance laws intended to limit political influence.

I guess 'royal king' 'forgot' once again to provide attribution, or even quotes to his plagarized post at 11:34 AM.

I'll do it for him:

It was the first two paragraphs of a Dec. 19th NYT story by Dan Van Natta Jr., Jo Beck, and Mike McIntire.

Now I wonder why J$ allows him to keep doing this?

Your welcome royal king.

Just wanterd to hear you whine.

Now, 'mike,' get your ass in gear and give attribution to the last 3,000 cut and pastes from patsy and why and prove your not a partisan hack, ok?

Now I wonder why J$ allows him to keep doing this?

Your welcome royal king.

Posted by: Mike at December 22, 2007 1:40 PM

Do you know what 'keep' means? Desperate, indeed.

royal king @ 2:34: "just wanterd to hear you whine."

Trust me sport, nobody is 'whining'!

However, I am wondering if you ever bothered to ask that same lawyer you claimed advised you to switch from your real name to a fake name on a discussion blog whether or not it is OK to break the law by plagaring someone else's work in the process of implying it is your own?

"Do you know what 'keep" means? Deperate, indeed?"

Yes, I know exactly what "keep" means sport.

I've seen you do it dozen's of times and usually, I don't bother to call you on it.

Here is a hint for you sport:......If something is written coherently and has your name under it, I think we ALL know immediately that you didn't write it.

BTW - I'm not "patsy and Why's" keeper....never have been....never will be.

break the law by plagaring someone else's work in the process of implying it is your own?

Posted by: Mike at December 22, 2007 2:50 PM

Funny, you've never asked why or patsy that. I wonder why.......

BTW - I'm not "patsy and Why's" keeper....never have been....never will be.

Posted by: Mike at December 22, 2007 2:56 PM

Just our daily dose of hypocrisy from whiney mike. What ever you do, DO NOT EVER say anything to why or patsy next time they cut and paste long screeds w/no attribution....hack.

royal king @ 3:00 PM: "What ever you do, DON NOT EVER say anything to why or patsy next time they cut and paste long screeds w/no attribution....hack."

Yet another silly manifestation of the rather tired and ridiculous 'but Clinton did it too' defense.

Tell you what sport; the next time you get stopped for speeding, try whining to the cop - 'but other drivers were speeding too', and see how far that gets you?

> Now I wonder why J$ allows him to keep doing this?

Well I'd rather he gave a link where it came from. But it's only four sentences which is quite a bit different from the posts that brought us 4, 6, or 10 PARAGRAPHS of stuff. So it doesn't qualify as a "long" cut and paste, though it certainly is unattributed.

Tell you what sport; the next time you get stopped for speeding, try whining to the cop - 'but other drivers were speeding too', and see how far that gets you?

Posted by: Mike at December 22, 2007 3:16 PM

The perfect diversion!

"The perfect diversion!"

Stupidity from RK!

Stupidity from RK!

Posted by: at December 22, 2007 7:23 PM

Defending the perfect diversion!!

"Defending the perfect diversion!!"

More stupidity from RK! the man can't stop himself.

UNICEF: War has taken a toll on Iraq's children
McClatchy Newspapers

Posted on Friday, December 21, 2007

Theor parents were too stupid to get them out.