Congrats, Mr. Cox....Paint me green with jealousy.

Go Giants!

"The green will go well with your brown nose." Typical liberal socialist comment-about nothing as usual....Move along....

Congrats on the press credentials. It should make life a lot easier getting through the gate (and if the credentials don't get you a seat near the 50-yard-line, hopefully, you'll be at towards the north end of the field, since the replay board at the south end is a lot bigger, and the mountains behind the south end window will provide a nice diversion to look at if the Giants are losing on Sunday).

Does anyone know if Olby will be attending? Perhaps Mr Cox could get an interview with His Lordship.

Great news!

Congratulations and have a great winning time.

Grammie

The green will go well with your brown nose.

Posted by:why don't you think at January 30, 2008 9:37 AM

Thanks, why!

Have fun Robert! Remember, when visiting the public restrooms, be sure to avoid the WIDE stance!

Go Pats(y)!

Yes, because McGreevy might be there looking for a date........I heard al freakshow might be there, too.

Looking forward your post after (hopefully) a win for Big Blue.

Bob, just saw this from a link at News Busters:

"Ryan Seacrest to host Super Bow"

http://www.tvsquad.com/2007/08/17/ryan-seacrest-to-host-super-bowl/

It looks like Fox didn't want to let NBC/KO to be the only candidates for the decade's worst move in football put their own out there Fox/Seacrest coverage.

Grammie

I guess Olbermann didn't get that big bump from the Kurtz interview. Number 1000 with a bullet! Also there is a 2 min video of Olbermann hawking his book. Enjoy:

Amazon.com Sales Rank: #1,062 in Books

http://www.amazon.com/Truth-Consequences-Comments-Administrations-American/dp/140006676X/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1201718608&sr=8-1

Isn't NBC getting the super bowl next year?

"Isn't NBC getting the super bowl next year?
Posted by: at January 30, 2008 2:30 PM "

I guess the winner of The Worst will be two out of three or three out of five b/c both Networks have lots more time to screw up big again.

Of course, if I were a judge I would give NBC/KO 15 out of 10 for for boneheaded decisions in the 2007 season. :)

Grammie

Keith's back at the Daily Kos commenting on a diary about him. He's letting everyone know that a "special comment" is comming. (BTW: Ratings have been down lately...):

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/1/29/10582/2692/87/445361

Here is one of his comments:

Just For The Record It's been less than it should've been - but we had a partial segment on it last night on this disconnect about W not accepting the month's extension, and I referenced it at least four times during our coverage after the State Of The Union last night.

And I ain't promising but I'm gathering stuff together for a possible S****** C****** before the week ends.

"If you're going through hell - keep going!" -- Winston Churchill

by Keith Olbermann on Tue Jan 29, 2008 at 09:37:37 AM PST

The politics of change

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEaS-K3j3M8

Great find, Benson.

It is funny no matter what side of the aisle you're from.

Grammie

I'm pleased but surprised you liked it. Shows more perspective than I though you had. It was indeed good.

oh, yes. She's back, the elitist.

Bob, I am still having periodic problems in that the search ends instantaneously.

Opening up a comment section on that thread might be interesting.

Grammie

\"oh, yes. She\'s back, the elitist.\"

Nothing here but an ad hominem attack. Luckily we can say that Rk isn\'t a troll, sure all he does is try to provoke anger but he does dislike Olbermann, Of course ANON disliked Olbermann too but he was a democrat.

Was there a point?

\"Was there a point?\"

yes the sum of your posts are just attacks, you never contribute anything but. ever.

Thank goodness for giving us a heads up on the cyber attack Robert. For a minute I thought I was banned. :D

It will be fun to see it traced back to Olbermann or his legions of Kossacks.

News said "Thank goodness for giving us a heads up on the cyber attack Robert. For a minute I thought I was banned. :D"

Rest assured news that before anyone got to you the truly mean and vicious, almost criminally so, Cee, RK, Cecelia, Sharon and I will get the Ax! :)

Grammie

yes the sum of your posts are just attacks, you never contribute anything but. ever.

Posted by:cowy at January 31, 2008 2:13 PM
>>>>
I'm pretty sure this would qualify as a contribution. Look, there's not a single attack! Read and weep.

Bad news for terrorist detainees! Good news for us.....

Ultimately, however, Mukasey said Wednesday he would not rule on whether waterboarding is a form of illegal torture because it is not part of the current interrogation methods used by the CIA on terror suspects. His non-answer angered Democrats who said the attorney general should be able to address a legal question.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080130/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/mukasey_torture

yes the sum of your posts are just attacks, you never contribute anything but. ever.

Posted by: at January 31, 2008 2:13 PM

Now, show me where you have made a "contribution" w/out attacking, like you just did to me, hypocrite.

Rest assured news that before anyone got to you the truly mean and vicious, almost criminally so, Cee, RK, Cecelia, Sharon and I will get the Ax! :)

Grammie
Posted by: Janet Hawkins at January 31, 2008 2:23 PM

Grammie,

I'm so viciously criminal, that merely being asked to leave by a blogowner would have me bidding a brisk "good day"....

The\'ve been deleted, but they were there. tell ou what I\'ll stop attacking if you do. You won\'t though. will you?

What's the purpose of using the backward slash button? Is it the drugs? Let me get this straight, you've been banned, your posts have been deleted and you claim I am the attacker? No, I am just the messenger. Now, get back to trolling, troll. I'm done with you.

No RK never attacks anyone.

From the last two days:

RK: \"oh, yes. She\'s back, the elitist.\"

RK:\" Who\'s your candidate, cowy? Just curious\"

Rk: \"One neat little package of total hypocrisy!\"

RK: \"Take your partisan blinders off and watch someone besides Olbyonesidedkanoby.\"

RK: \"Actually, your comment above is an outright lie, nothing more.Since when have you ever posted facts? Your above post is a prime example. mike didn\'t post a SINGLE fact, either. Pure opinion. You lose, again.\"

Now that you have been made to look foolsih yet again, I give you permision to move on RK.

Oh the slashes represent your stupidity. Everytime you see a slash that is what I am syaing.

The backward slashes are a telltale sign that the poster is using an ISP spoofer, either to conceal his identity, or to get around an ISP ban. You'll notice how they show up where quote marks are supposed to be? That's a side-effect of using proxy ISPs to post comments and get around a ban. And it's also cowardly.

\"You\'ll notice how they show up where quote marks are supposed to be? That\'s a side-effect of using proxy ISPs to post comments and get around a ban. And it\'s also cowardly\"

What is cowardly about it? and I disagree it is a symbol to represent how stupid RK is.

What is cowardly is running from an argument Johnny. You are a coward.

I'm not in an argument to run from. I stated facts. There can be no arguing facts, unless you are an Olbyloon. And I'm not.

No facts posted. Only opinions. You called me a coward. That is an opinion.

Maybe we could meet sometime and I can prove I\'m not by kicking your ass.

> You called me a coward. That is an opinion.

Wrong. I said it was cowardly to use proxy ISPs to get around a ban. That doesn't make you a coward, unless of course you ARE using proxy ISPs to get around a ban. In other words, you just called yourself a coward.

That is some truly tortured circular logic, as I questioned why using a proxy server to get around a ban is cowardly. You are saying that I am calling myself a coward by admitting to use of a proxy server. Since there is nothing cowardly about I most certainly did not call myself a coward.

You must have been some trial lawyer.

THAT IS some truly...
YOU ARE saying that I AM calling...
Since THERE IS nothing...

Man, you're working overtime to avoid using those quote marks. LOL!

\"Man, you are working overtime to avoid using those quote marks. LOL!\"

Oh not at all. As i said think of them as symbol of RK\'s stupidity. Your intellectual equal.

Nice response to the above btw, I have enjoyed making you look so foolish.

That's nice. I have enjoyed worming an admission out of you that you're spoofing ISPs to get around a ban. Mr Cox will take care of the rest.

Daily Kos tells Keith to do a "Special Comment" about FISA, and Keith responds "Yes, Master".

\"That\'s nice. I have enjoyed worming an admission out of you that you\'re spoofing ISPs to get around a ban. Mr Cox will take care of the rest.\"

Well good luck with that. Since I have never recived anything formal from Cox asking me not to frequent this blog, and since I just used a proxy server to visit this site, hardl illegal I\'m not worried.

You've unleashed PANDORA'S BOX!

If you had gotten beyond 3rd grade you'd know that a blog can't censor anyone. Only a government can. ANd you'd also know that nothing prevents you from posting a link to something. But you insist on cutting and pasting entire off-topic articles without attribution, and you know what I do with those. One might ask, why don't you think, why don't you think?

What censorship? There's no censorship on this forum. This isn't like Daily Kos where they actually do censor people. I know from experience.

> Daily Kos tells Keith to do a "Special Comment" about FISA, and Keith responds "Yes, Master".

Now will he head there to read the reviews, praising him for speaking truth to power. I bet he spends his entire night there, curled up in his tub with Katy reading the positive comments.

Or DU. Or HuffingtonPost. Or Media Matters or. . . . . well you get the point.

These accusations of censorship against J$ and R Cox displays the momumenttal IGNORANCE of the accusers.

Governments censor.

R Cox uses the authority based on his ownership of this site. J$ exercises the authority that R Cox has delegated to him.

If your ideas can stand up to scrutiny whatever venue you use to convey them will succeed. If not, down the old crapper with you, a la Watching Olbermann Watch.

There is no right, Constituional or otherwise, to usurp others in their pursuit of free speech or to commandeer another's property.

R Cox hass only a few simple and reasonable rules to follow to be accepted as a commentator at HIS blog.

No copyright violations.

No spamming

Get your mouth out of the gutter.

If this upsets you poor little babies I wonder how you behave with others. You fools act to your mothers and grandmothers the way you do here?

Do you bombard blogs you agree with with Spam?

Do you violate copyright and other laws in your personal and business lives because the rules don't apply to you?

I've seen a lot of moaning and groaning and justification for all of this but none of it flies.

In short, you are one bunch of creepy pukes.

Grammie

"Think" just got the foot up their butt in another thread.

I don't get the mindset of wanting to stay at a gathering after being thrown out by the host. What grown person thinks like that?

It makes me wonder if we've made a false assumption that this person (or people) are adults.

Instead of it just being a wisecrack about some teenager/s in his room with his computer, in this instance, might it REALLY be the case?

The nazi's ( Dollar and Cox) are starting to show their true republican colors of censorship with their banning appetite.
I suppose as we get closer to the election and the republican candidate looks worse and worse,...they will be getting even testier.

Posted by: Why Don't You Think at January 31, 2008 8:24 PM

Hey, loser. I made 2 posts over at your heros site, the bung hole and not only did they not get deleted, they didn't even get posted! No curse words, no cut and paste jobs with no attribution, I even told him that I couldn't wait for his special comment tonight. Now, go bitch at him for he is the true nazi!

In short, you are one bunch of creepy pukes.

Grammie
Posted by: Janet Hawkins at January 31, 2008 9:39 PM

How could you stoop so low, Grammie, and I respected you so much. I don't think the ACLU would even defend that one. I think your time here may be limited. It tricked down the grapevine.

trickled

To be exposed at this late date.

Too old to change my identity and start a new life to escape my shame at such foul offensive
to humanity language.

Oh, well, I'll think about that tomorrow!

Grammie

Okay, Scarlett.

Sharon, you caught me out.

I have always dreamed of having a seventeen inch waist AND Rhett Butler! :)

Grammie

Sharon, you caught me out.

I have always dreamed of having a seventeen inch waist AND Rhett Butler! :)

Grammie
Posted by: Janet Hawkins at January 31, 2008 10:26 PM

Now you know all you really wanted was Ashley... :D

When Rhett carired her up the stairs Mama had to restrain me from jumping through the screen as if it were a Stargate. :)

Grammie

Rhett versus Ashley? Not even a contest!

Federal Law - The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.

The FBI has initiated a federal investigation into the recent DDOS attacks. In the event of indictments, the hackers will be prosecuted under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, Title 18, United States Code Section 1030 (the “CFAA”). Subsection (5)(A) of the CFAA makes it a crime to,

a. knowingly causes the transmission of a program, information, code, or command, and as a result of such conduct, intentionally causes damage without authorization, to a protected computer.

This definition would seem to apply to both IP and e-mail spoofing. A protected computer is very broadly defined as a computer,

b. exclusively for the use of a financial institution or the United States Government, or, in the case of a computer not exclusively for such use, used by or for a financial institution or the United States Government and the conduct constituting the offense affects that use by or for the financial institution or the Government; or
which is used in interstate or foreign commerce or communication.

The penalty for violating the CFAA is a maximum five years in prison and a minimum six-month incarceration for each offense. Repeat offenders can face a maximum 10-year prison term and fines ranging from $250,000 to twice the gross losses incurred by the victims. Significantly, the law also allows those affected to file civil suits against their attackers.

Were there attacks on this site that resulted in service not being availible?

Yes. See the Thread by R Cox titled "DoS Attack Shuts Down Olbermann Watch" a day or ago.

Grammie

Wow, I missed that. I'll look it up.

thanks.

Just saw this at Scrappleface.

"John Edwards Drops Out, Endorses McCain"

http://www.scrappleface.com/?p=2882

The conclusion: "While Mr. Edwards played down speculation that he might bring balance to the ticket as Sen. McCain’s running mate, he noted that it would be “a once-in-a-lifetime thrill to team up with an actual Vietnam war hero.”

Grammie

There is some truth to the accusation that the Right is in a full-fledged panic. The proof is their nastines and pettiness. The new guidelines for this site are merly evidence of that. But, this is to expected. It doesn't matter what happens in November now. Republicans are refusing to run for re-electionin droves. The hopes of the Right now rest on a most disagreeable waffling cultist. I understand the panic. I don't imagine they ever thought these days would be over. Not that they weren't warned Bush & Co. would destroy the Reagan Revolution. They were just too arrogant and conceited to listen. Well, you are reaping what you have sown, and it is a bitter harvest. You still ought not be lashing out at those who told you this would happen simply for being correct.

Guess you haven't seen the piece at huffpo about hillary and obama accusing each other of "nazi tactics" have you? No long cut and paste jobs in regards to that one, ay? Shocker.

Why would I read the Huffington Post? You always make derogatory comments about it. I read the Wiener Wrap and Lussyanne for all my news.

Why would I read the Huffington Post? You always make derogatory comments about it. I read the Wiener Wrap and Lussyanne for all my news.

Posted by: at February 1, 2008 7:48 PM

Well, good. At least you've got some sense.

Yea, right, like you don't get all of your news from the puffpo. Tell us another one......

Here's another one:

A man is driving down a lane in Ballyglass, County Mayo, and he stops to ask a farmer how to get to Killala, and the farmer says, "Well you'll not want to be starting your trip from here."

Debunking 'why'.....fish in a tub

WASHINGTON — U.S. Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., says the City of Berkeley, Calif., no longer deserves federal money.

DeMint was angered after learning that the Berkeley City Council voted this week to tell the U.S. Marine Corps to remove its recruiting station from the city's downtown.

"This is a slap in the face to all brave service men and women and their families," DeMint said in a prepared statement. "The First Amendment gives the City of Berkeley the right to be idiotic, but from now on they should do it with their own money."

"If the city can’t show respect for the Marines that have fought, bled and died for their freedom, Berkeley should not be receiving special taxpayer-funded handouts," he added.

Attribution:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,327466,00.html