Links to OlbermannWatch.com
Blog posts tagged with "Olbermann"
"COUNTDOWN WITH KEITH OLBERMANN" (8:00 P.M.-9:00 P.M. ET)
Host: Keith Olbermann
Topics/Guests:
It's a new year, and that means the infamous, deplorable Keith Olbermann starts fresh giving us material for our Top Ten Olbermann Lies of 2008. Our work begins now--it's the opening spiel: Iowa! Huckabee goes on Leno. Campaign ads. "Republicans" attack each other (but Dems don't?). Oh goodie, the "torture tapes" again. Plus Hollywood scandals. All that and more on hump day at Olbermann Watch.
#5: Kucinich asks supporters to back Obama as their second choice. Dems make direct appeals to voters with ads (clips from Hillary, Obama, Edwards). Slippery Shuster recapped caucus rules, to which Herr Olbermann said "that begs the obvious question...". Um, no it doesn't. It raises the question, not begs it. Keith the ace wordsmith dazzles the ignorant once again. Bathman tried to dismiss the recent poll that shows Obama surging ahead of Hillary, and Robin sort of played along but noting how accurate the Des Moines paper has been in the past. Oddly, Slippery got Thanksed, but not Great Thanksed.
Next, lefty Alter was there to critique the wisdom of Iowa having caucuses. It's "pretty troublesome" he noted, apparently preferring that campaigns all be conducted with national tv ads and appeals to big cities. More deep thoughts from lefty: nobody knows who will win, "a win is a win"... these are the dazzling insights that make him a regular on The Hour of Spin. He was not Great Thanksed but he was Pleasured.
#4: After the reverential treatment of the kindly Dems, with no talk of any attacks on each other, no gaffes, no insults, the tone changed dramatically. Now it was vicious infighting, moronic candidates, and embarrassing gaffes. You guessed it, KO was now talking about Repubs! Which one will "lose less badly"? A supposed Huckabee gaffe about the writers' strike (Blue Blog Source: Oliver Willis), plus KO dredged up again Huck not having read about the latest NIE. That story is--what--weeks old? Edward R Olbermann went on at length with GOP-hater Robinson about all this--keep that in mind when we get to the non-barking dogs. The pair went on to chortle over McCain attacks on Romney, Romney attacks on McCain and Huckabee, yada yada. It's a Republican "demolition derby", sniggered Fat Ass. Eugene was Pleasured.
After another Pulitzer-worthy chapter of "oddball" Olby inflicted #3 on his viewers: it's WaterTortureBoardingTapingGate, or whatever the hell he's calling it now. It's why the election is so important, ruled Judge Oralmann. Oh goodie, it's Olby & the Perfessor again. How long until he finds a federal crime? Start the clock. Wow, that was fast: just three seconds and The Perfessor found six of them! It's worse than watergate! It's a whole range of crimes! It leads directly to the President! We need a special prosecutor! Um, did The Perfessor forget that the Congress repealed that law after a special counsel got a little too close to Bill Jefferson Clinton? No matter, The Perfessor was Great Thanksed.
#2: Paul McCartney, Heather Mills, Eddie Murphy, Gavin Newsome, and a book plug. #1: Paris Hilton and other celebrity trivia with the creepy Michael Musto--journalism at its finest.
In the Media Matters Minute, we got your "right wing extremist" (Wendy Wright), a reference to Fixed News [Ding!], and we got your "really dumb" Bill Kristol of Fox Noise [Ding!] (Blue Blog Source: Hillary Clinton's Media Matters). Yup, Olby's comments tracked exactly with the ones at the Soros site--straight from Brock's webpage to Oralmann's teleprompter.
Dogs That Did Not Bark: It was a fun night for Mr Merkle, as he cackled about the stupid Republicans and their humiliating gaffes. How ignorant they are! What dopes would vote for them? But as we have noted before, they name streets after guys like Keith Olbermann: "One Way". With all his ridiculing of the foreign policy cred of the GOPers, for some reason he didn't see fit to report this. Aww, it's just too warm and snuggly in Hillary's coat pocket for a slovenly political hack like Krazy Keith.
Olbermann's book The book that bears Olbermann's name languishes at #95,323 on amazon, while "Culture Warrior" is #17,212. (It's that 2-for-$25 sale!) Barnes & Noble has the OlbyTome at #38,056; O'Reilly's book is #1,977 there. In the battle of the paperbacks: Amazon lists Culture Warrior at #2,401, while Oralmann's book is a mighty #2,678. On Thursday, the infamous deplorable Keith Olbermann interrupted his vacation for a very special edition of The Hour of Spin. Unfortunately, his efforts only netted him a poor third place finish behind The O'Laura Factor and even CNN's hit-and-run killer, both in total viewers and in the coveted, pivotal, much-beloved, critical, all-important "key demo".
They didn't want to rerun Oddball or Special Comments a 3rd time?
Great, it's "Groundhog Day II" starring Keith Olbermann.
they name streets after guys like Keith Olbermann: "One Way".
J$
Too friggin' hilarious!
Allow me, please. Apparently she's never spoke with 'mike.'
http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/01/video-smartest-woman-in-the-world-doesnt-know-the-first-thing-about-pakistan/
Same old, Same old from the most honest (LOL) man in News.
Same old, Same old from the most honest (LOL) man in News.
If nothing else, he's consistent. Consistently delusional. WHY does he have to be so easy to hate? Does this man have ANY redeeming qualities????
I think Keith has come to the conclusion that life IS easier with blinders on.
Posted by: royal king at January 2, 2008 10:09 PM
Ya know RK, here in 08' we shouldn't be haters like Mike. We should show da luv!
I think 'The smartest woman on earth' should spend a day with this Historical / Geographical genius.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lj3iNxZ8Dww
Maybe between the both of them, they might find New Jersey on a map.
McCool; "Does this man have ANY redeeming qualities????"
Well obviously, it depends on who is doing the redeeming.
Fearmongers would obviously not find any.
Fearmongers
I would qualify that as an
AD HOMINEM ATTACK
Go back to sleep Mike, life is grand, just keep sipping the koolaid
How's the antique business mike?
"Go back to sleep Mike, life is grand,"
How can I possibly sleep with all those evil Muslims out trying to get me?
How can I possibly sleep with all those evil Muslims out trying to get me?
Posted by: Mike at January 2, 2008 10:54 PM
Don't worry Mike , thye won't bother you as long as you keep wearing the veil and don't show your ankles
"How's the antique business Mike?"
In a nutshell...furniture is down....the high end is up....and the low end is down.
Well, try serving some free frappachinos and piping Olby on an 8 hr loop into the store.
"How can I possibly sleep with all those evil Muslims out trying to get me?"
But Mr. Murrow Jr. tells you - and he's never wrong - that the threat is all a fraud perpetuated by the Republicans to scare voters into supporting them.
Besides, you still have to worry about the greatest terror threat in America according to our brave savior Keith Olbermann: The Republican Party.
Or is it Fox News?
Well, one of those two monstrous evil entities will get you.
So sayeth news anchor Keith Olbermann.
And remember: Olbermann has no political agenda. Because he said so.
Terrorists? What terrorists?
Islamists Kill Around The Globe While Libs Deny Terrorists/Terrorism Exhists!
The State of Jihad: 2007
By Bill RoggioJanuary 1, 2008 2:10 PM
The US and her allies in Europe, the Middle East, and beyond have witnessed both stunning successes and dramatic setbacks in the Long War during 2007. Pakistan has continued its slide towards a failed state, with the government having relinquished control over additional territory to the Taliban and, thus, al Qaeda. Suicide bombings and attacks on all segments of the state plagued Pakistan as the Taliban and al Qaeda cemented their new safe havens. Iraq, which seemed all but lost at the end of 2006 as the US appeared to lose the all-important political will, has turned around with the change in counterinsurgency plan and the surge of troops US and Iraqi troops. Al Qaeda and the Iranian-backed Shia terrorists are losing ground and local support in Iraq. Afghanistan has seen its worst year of violence since the Taliban was defeated in late 2001; suicide bombings and IED attacks skyrocketed due to the problems in Pakistan.
The war also continues in dozens of lesser theaters. India suffered numerous blows from Pakistani-based terrorists. Al Qaeda has revitalized itself in Algeria and greater northern Africa. A brutal insurgency is being waged in Somalia after the Islamic Courts was ousted at the end of 2006. The Philippines saw some progress against Abu Sayyaf and Jemaah Islamiyah in the southern provinces. Thailand's Islamist insurgency ballooned in 2007. Al Qaeda is attempting to revive the jihad in Chechnya and the greater Caucasus. Saudi Arabia and Yemen continue to breed the next generation of al Qaeda fighters.
Royal! Don't go confusing Mike with all of those facts! I bet halliburton is funding all of it!
"But Mr. Morrow Jr. told you - and he's never wrong - that the threat is all a fraud perpetrated by the republicans to scare voters into supporting them."
Actually, I told him that! But you have it wrong:
What I actually told him was that the republicans have shamelessly used fear of terrorism as a wedge issue by falsely claiming that THEY are the ones best equipped to fight it.
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/015748.php
November 03, 2006
Terrorists to USA: Vote Democratic!
Is a vote for the Democrats a vote for the terrorists? No Republican would dare say such a thing, but the terrorists do. Don't miss Aaron Klein's remarkable World Net Daily column. Klein is WND's man in Jeruslem. He tracked down some actual terrorists to find out whether they are following our elections, and what their views of them are:
Everybody has an opinion about next Tuesday's midterm congressional election in the U.S. – including senior terrorist leaders interviewed by WND who say they hope Americans sweep the Democrats into power because of the party's position on withdrawing from Iraq, a move, as they see it, that ensures victory for the worldwide Islamic resistance.
The terrorists told WorldNetDaily an electoral win for the Democrats would prove to them Americans are "tired."
"Of course Americans should vote Democrat," Jihad Jaara, a senior member of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades terror group and the infamous leader of the 2002 siege of Bethlehem's Church of the Nativity, told WND.
"This is why American Muslims will support the Democrats, because there is an atmosphere in America that encourages those who want to withdraw from Iraq. It is time that the American people support those who want to take them out of this Iraqi mud," said Jaara, speaking to WND from exile in Ireland, where he was sent as part of an internationally brokered deal that ended the church siege.
Muhammad Saadi, a senior leader of Islamic Jihad in the northern West Bank town of Jenin, said the Democrats' talk of withdrawal from Iraq makes him feel "proud."
"As Arabs and Muslims we feel proud of this talk," he told WND. "Very proud from the great successes of the Iraqi resistance. This success that brought the big superpower of the world to discuss a possible withdrawal."
Abu Abdullah, a leader of Hamas' military wing in the Gaza Strip, said the policy of withdrawal "proves the strategy of the resistance is the right strategy against the occupation."
"We warned the Americans that this will be their end in Iraq," said Abu Abdullah, considered one of the most important operational members of Hamas' Izzedine al-Qassam Martyrs Brigades, Hamas' declared "resistance" department. "They did not succeed in stealing Iraq's oil, at least not at a level that covers their huge expenses. They did not bring stability. Their agents in the [Iraqi] regime seem to have no chance to survive if the Americans withdraw."
If Obama and Edwards finish ahead of Hillary tonight, it's going to be interesting watching Olby on Friday and Monday (assuming he doesn't retire to the lavatory bath to enjoy the waters) trying to spin things Hillary's way while at the same time not alienating his core audience of far lefties who are the least likely in the Democratic Party to be backers of Mrs. Clinton.
What I actually told him was that the republicans have shamelessly used fear of terrorism as a wedge issue by falsely claiming that THEY are the ones best equipped to fight it.
Posted by: Mike at January 2, 2008 11:09 PM
THATS FALSE????
How can I possibly sleep with all those evil Muslims out trying to get me?
Posted by: Mike at January 2, 2008 10:54 PM
10:55 PM
I thought you would have felt safe within the walls of Edwards’s compound. As the chief house boy, I thought you would have been afforded a certain degree of protection. I wouldn't worry too much, the slip and fall lawyer is a good litigator and if some misfortune does occur to you, Johnny will be able to get you something for all your pain and suffering ............. less his contingency fee of course.
"Royal, don't go confusing Mike with all of those facts."
McCool, common sense would dictate that you might want to choose your associates a little more critically.
After all, a commonly shared ideology becomes highly overrated when you choose to associate with the laughably inane at the expense of your own reputation.
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/
10296 fatal muslim terror attacks worldwide since 9/11
coincidence??
Does ANYONE have any doubts as to what party America's enemies, be it muslim terrorists, Chavez, Ahmadouchebag, Crazy Kim, or Putin, want to win the presidency?
Olby's beating the same dead horse
Hackneyed journalist tour de force
Countdown's really lame
In '08 it's the same
Water-boring, Bush-bashing (of course)
Nice photoshop job, really. I chuckled when I saw it.
The balance of the commentary, as predictable as your unwavering empirical perception of Olby, continues to be yawnable.
You poor maligned neo-fascists.
Have to admit, the ongoing book-sales rankings were mildly amusing early on; but now it seems to illustrate that readers of Olby's work may actually read more than one book a year (shocking!).
Using the sales numbers-only approach, for example in the current B&N rankings, suggests Cruise's "The 12 Second Sequence" (at 2nd) is a more-qualified read than Tsu's "The Art of War" (at 7th). I guess you'd have to be more loony to appreciate Tsu's work more than Cruise's by your apparent criteria. No worries dear ad-hoc thinkers, it's just another old, quaint philosophy not entirely unlike defending democracy or supporting liberty. Silly liberal stuff.
Then again, never underestimate your enemy and attack from above whenever possible.
Hey Johnny “boy”,.…who at Fox News put you up to creating this website attacking Olbermann?
at the expense of your own reputation.
I have a reputation??
Nice photoshop job, really. I chuckled when I saw it.
The balance of the commentary, as predictable as your unwavering empirical perception of Olby, continues to be yawnable.
You poor maligned neo-fascists.
Have to admit, the ongoing book-sales rankings were mildly amusing early on; but now it seems to illustrate that readers of Olby's work may actually read more than one book a year (shocking!).
Using the sales numbers-only approach, for example in the current B&N rankings, suggests Cruise's "The 12 Second Sequence" (at 2nd) is a more-qualified read than Tsu's "The Art of War" (at 7th). I guess you'd have to be more loony to appreciate Tsu's work more than Cruise's by your apparent criteria. No worries dear ad-hoc thinkers, it's just another old, quaint philosophy not entirely unlike defending democracy or supporting liberty. Silly liberal stuff.
Then again, never underestimate your enemy and attack from above whenever possible.
"What I actually told him was that the republicans have shamelessly used fear of terrorism as a wedge issue by falsely claiming that THEY are the ones best equipped to fight it. "
Falsely claiming?
Your new friends on the left say that the threat is neglible if it exists at all.
How could policies based on a non-existent - or minimally-existent - threat be better?
That makes no sense.
Let's assume, just for a debating point, that that is true. That the GOP is "shamelessly" scaring folks on the threat of terrorism.
Do the Democrats ever use fear of Bush or the Republicans or the evil corporations in order to win votes?
Do liberals ever say that Republicans will take away Grandma's social security if you vote for them?
Do liberals ever say that Republicans will let more children starve, or more people die of dirty water or dirty air, if you vote for them?
When your hero Olbermann says the Republicans are the greatest terror group in America, is he scaring people?
This is, after all, Olbermann Watch. Not Republican Watch.
How does Olbermann pass your test on who is "shamelessly" scaring people?
The floor is yours.
"I thought you would have felt safe within the walls of Edward's compound."
No, those walls are made of stucco.
I feel a lot safer in my own compound behind my gated guard shack and stone fence.
I like Steve
McCool: "I have a reputation."
Everything is relative, you know!
you can soar with the eagles or wallow with the worms. You've been going back and forth.
You were doing the latter at 11:08.
stone fence ?????????
Posted by: Mike at January 2, 2008 11:22 PM
What is a stone fence? Is it like a stone wall?
"hat is a stone fence? Is it like a stone wall?"
Don't you even watch "high Net Worth" to keep up with the latest goodies they've come up with to protect us from the proletariat?
"You don't have to make excuses for speaking the facts about Bush , the GOP and corporations.
Their damning enough, and something Steve would rather not remember."
I see, when liberals do it, "Its the truth".
No scare tactics when they say Republicans will take away Grandma's social security?
No scare tactics when they say Republicans will make more children starve or die do to dirty water or dirty air?
Those aren't "shamelessly" scaring folks?
The GOP ran the government for 6 years.
No SS checks were taken away.
No increase in children starving occurred.
Et cetera, et cetera.
> Using the sales numbers-only approach
I'm glad you like that approach. It is, of course, Keith's idea, started back when he would crow about how his book was beating O'Reilly's (particularly when O'Reilly's book wasn't even out yet, though Keith would lie and say that is was). Of course when O'Reilly's book started outselling Olby's, all of a sudden Oralmann stopped comparing the sales figures. So we continued what he started.
I actually agree with you. It is a silly, superficial, and meaningless comparison. Which describes most of what Olbermann does. Your criticisms of Keith are spot on.
Hey Johnny “boy”,.…who at Fox News put you up to creating this website attacking Olbermann?
Why did you move away from the subject of terrorism so quickly Steve?
> Hey Johnny “boy”,.…who at Fox News put you up to creating this website attacking Olbermann?
Some idiots never learn that it's better to keep quiet, thereby not exposing themselves as the nitwits that they are. Hey idiot chickenblogger, who put you up to the lie that I created this site?
Hey, 'mike.' How long before you accuse McCool of 'defending' me w/no proof? I laugh my ass off every time you try to turn people against me using your superiority complex.
Still 'don't have time to prove Johnny wrong?'
MIKE is really wise and handsome.
Am i soaring with the eagles now Mike?
"It's very funny that most of America is pretty much embarrassed and disgusted of what has gone down under Bush and the republicans the last 7 years, "
Bush wasn't elected to make leftwingers happy.
In fact, he's supposed to make you mad.
Canary in the coal mine, if you will.
Anyway, name one Republican president - including Lincoln the first - that the Democrats and left didn't despise?
And it's always amusing how these discussions on the journalism of Keith Olbermann are always hijacked by his apologists into discussions of the Bush Administration.
As they say in law, if you can't argue facts, just pound the table.
Lots of tables being pounded at this site.
Steve, did you see the post Factor made one day recently when he called Social Security "The Mother of all Entitlement Programs"?
While I'm aware that most Republicans are not as rabidly right wing as Factor, keep in mind that this IS the kind of thought that is coming from many on the right these days.
Don't try to tell me that many of them wouldn't eliminate SS if they could.
Why did you move away from the subject of terrorism so quickly Steve?
Posted by: Mike at January 2, 2008 11:32 PM
He was showing other topics to prove your double standard Mike, i think even WHY would have gotten that.
It's very funny that most of America is pretty much embarrassed and disgusted of what has gone down under Bush and the republicans the last 7 years, but listening to these wingnuts, you would think it's "morning in America."
That is the definition of delusional !
Posted by: at January 2, 2008 11:31 PM
That being the case, how do you explain the legislative record of your buddies on the left side of the isle?
McCool:
"Mike is really wise and handsome"
"Am i soaring with the eagles now?"
Nope, now you're pandering....sight unseen.
Holy crap, johnny dollar and I are in concert for once on this site. It is a new year indeed. Thanks for the insight, sincerely.
Steve on Bush: "In fact he is supposed to make you mad."
Interesting! A man who originally ran for president using the mantra that he was a "uniter rather than a divider" was actually SUPPOSED to be a divider!
"Anyway, name me one Republican President including Lincoln, the first - that the Democrats and the left didn't despise."
His daddy...the last!
Don't try to tell me that many of them wouldn't eliminate SS if they could.
Posted by: Mike at January 2, 2008 11:37 PM
it NEEDS to be modified at the very least. Whats wrong with giving peopel choice over THEIR money? Or do you have so little faith in your fellow democrats that you fear they would not do wise things with their money. The system is UNSUSTAINABLE in its present condition. I know YOU don't personally care, you'll be dead by the time it bankrupts this country
Don't try to tell me that many of them wouldn't eliminate SS if they could.
Posted by: Mike at January 2, 2008 11:37 PM
Please don't tell us that you are dumb enough to hope for any portion of your retirement income to come from that Ponzi scheme?
Robert Cox
Managing editor
Olbywatch.com
I want an explanation. Are you one of these sex offenders listed on family watchdog. What are your full name and DOB, and anything else that will prove that you are not one of these sex offenders?
Since your site accuses others of lies, then I accuse you of being a sex offender. Prove that you’re not.
Here’s a list of sex offenders searched from all 50 states on http://www.familywatchdog.us/
ROBERT A COX, 59 TREBING LANE
WILLINGBORO, NJ 08046
COX,ROBERT DEAN, 5108 BETHEL ST
BOISE, ID 83706
COX, ROBERT DEAN, 5108 BETHEL ST
BOISE, ID 83706
ROBERT D COX, 502 BEECH STApt. 53
SAVANNA, IL 61074
ROBERT EDWARD COX JR., HC 65 BOX 1170
ROMNEY, WV 26757
COX,ROBERT LEE, 2338 GIVENDALE RD
DALLAS, TX 75241
COX,ROBERT DANIEL, 3136 MARYS LN
FORT WORTH, TX 76116
ROBERT COX, 4505 3RD STREET CIR W APT 270
BRADENTON, FL 34207-1509
ROBERT SHULER COX, 220 WEST RUSSEL STREET APT 3
SIOUX FALLS, SD 57104
ROBERT ELLIS COX, INCARCERATED / PRISON
SIOUX FALLS, SD 57117
Robert Parish Cox, MDOC WINSTON COUNTY COR FAC
LOUISVILLE, MS 39339
COX, ROBERT BANKSTON, 222 BRENTWOOD CIRCLE
GREENVILLE, SC 29605
COX, Robert Ellis Not Mappable 14425 S Bitterbrush Rd
Draper, Ut 84020
ROBERT A COX Mappable 126 S 7TH ST
DELAVAN, WI 53115
Robert Aleen Cox Mappable 1117 2ND ST NW
CANTON, OH 44703
Robert Scott Cox Mappable 1621 Beaufield
Ferndale, MI 48220
Robert C Coxwell Mappable Department of Corrections
Incarcerated, FL 00000
McCool, I've always been fascinated at the way you republicans show so much concern about the FUTURE problem of Social Security....but so little concern about the CURRENT problem of an unnecessary war that is ALREADY bankrupting this country?
Do you think the money is coming from different pots?
Why did you move away from the subject of terrorism so quickly Steve?
Posted by: Mike at January 2, 2008 11:32 PM
Really Mike? You want to talk about terrorism? I thought, according to you and your hero Keith Olbermann, that there was no terrorist threat.
LOL
Yeah, THATS normal
McCool, I've always been fascinated at the way you republicans show so much concern about the FUTURE problem of Social Security....but so little concern about the CURRENT problem of an unnecessary war that is ALREADY bankrupting this country?
Do you think the money is coming from different pots?
Posted by: Mike at January 2, 2008 11:51 PM
I THINK that was a change of subjects....
Money wont do any of us any good if we are getting our asses blown off here at home
As they say in law, if you can't argue facts, just pound the table.
Lots of tables being pounded at this site.
Posted by: Steve at January 2, 2008 11:36 PM
Bush has the lowest rating for a president since Nixon.
That's a fact.
America is disgusted of what you republicans have done to our country.
If you don't think those are facts, it's time you pound the table a little harder, and then go hide under it.
Dope !
Posted by: at January 2, 2008 11:47 PM
Just curious, how many Presidential elections have you voted in? Your perspective on these matters seems, to put it quite mildly, rather shallow.
"Please don't tell us that you're dumb enough to hope that any portion of your retirement income to come from that Ponzi scheme?"
No, I've given up hope for that after watching this Republican administration turn the first surplus in years into the worst deficits and debt in the history of this country.
I'm hoping my mother's will hold out though.
> Prove that you’re not.
Funniest thing from an Olbypologist I've seen all year. "Prove that you're not." Hahaaaaahaaaaa!
When polled, people said by 80% that we are heading in the wrong direction as a country.
Some inconvenient facts for you.
78% attributed to Congress performance
Ok, I'm tired of seeing Mike get his ass whipped from so many different directions.
Mike, what evidence have you seen that shows that Social Security is not going broke?
McCool: "I think that was a change of subjects."
No it wasn't!!!!
On one hand, it's Ok to bankrupt the country.....But on the other hand it's not.
Bankrupt is bankrupt!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
McCool: "Money won't do us any good if e're getting our asses blown off here at home"
I'd like just ONCE....Just ONE time....for someone to give me a coherent argument as to how invading and occupying the country of Iraq has made us one whit safer or more secure than if we hadn't?
Just ONCE!
"Mike, what evidence have you seen that Social Security is not going broke?"
James, I guess you just decided to skip my entire argument above about Social Security and go on to the next one?
Earth to James: I never said SS is not going broke!
Now go back and read my posts again.
Mike, you are in fantasy land pal. First, you believe that there is no terrorist threat. Second, you believe that Social Security is hunky dory and doesn't need fixing. Third, you believe that the world is safer with Saddam Hussein in power. Mike, it's time for you to wake up and smell the coffee.
Well obviously, it depends on who is doing the redeeming.
Fearmongers would obviously not find any.
Posted by: Mike at January 2, 2008 10:46 PM
I think Al Gore likes Keith.
jeesh, the anger from the left is scary.
Mike, the best defense is a good offense. No attacks in what? 6 years? What was Clinton's best?
NO SHIT I pulled 78 % out of my ass. If you believe every poll you read and are blissfully unaware how easily it is to manipulate the questions or the results then i guess I can not cure your righteous fury and indignation.
McCool: "78% attributed to Congress performance."
AGREED:
Congress HAS failed by not exercising it's constitutional mandate of providing oversight to a power grabbing Executve Banch.
Congress HAS failed by not exercising it's constitutional mandate of providing oversight to a power grabbing Executve Banch.
Posted by: Mike at January 3, 2008 12:11 AM
DAMN IT I KNEW it was GW's fault in the end
James, I don't believe ANY of the things you just claimed I believe!
Now if you would like to go back and CAREFULLY read my posts concerning both terrorism and SS, and stop spitting out silly Hannity inspired talking points....we can continue on from there.
"DAMN IT I KNEW it was GW's fault in the end."
Your flight level is sinking a little McCool....better start flapping those wings a little more.
Can you?
Do you even know their legislative record ? I'm betting you don't. Your ignorance is legendary.
Democrats did pass and got the president to sign off on a minimum wage increase, upgrades in homeland security, cuts in college costs, and a new energy bill.
Congress also pushed through a major overhaul of ethics and lobbying rules this year, and got more money for veterans.
A lot more than 6 years of a GOP Congress did.
The Democratic Congress did not end this war, which is the albatross around their neck.
It will take a Democratic president to do it, because as we know, if a republican is elected, it will be more of the same.
One thing that is written in stone, America doesn't want more of the same.
When polled, people said by 80% that we are heading in the wrong direction as a country.
Some inconvenient facts for you.
Posted by: at January 2, 2008 11:57 PM
Yeah, how bout that mimimum wage.
They barly passed an AMT fix.
upgrades in homeland security, cuts in college costs, and a new energy bill.
Congress also pushed through a major overhaul of ethics and lobbying rules this year, and got more money for veterans.
Can you provide the link to the legislation text and the roll call vote for these?
> Hey Johnny “boy”,.…who at Fox News put you up to creating this website attacking Olbermann?
Hey! somebody want to call newshounds.us and tell them one of their little yappers is loose.
Ten.
My perspective is based on facts unlike yourself whose perspective is based on right wing dogma.
Dope.
Posted by: at January 3, 2008 12:06 AM
Ten, and who were the two candidates in your first election.
Well obviously, it depends on who is doing the redeeming.
Fearmongers would obviously not find any.
Posted by: Mike at January 2, 2008 10:46 PM
I think Al Gore likes Keith.
Posted by: The Factor at January 3, 2008 12:10 AM
Sorry Factor, I missed this post about the Mother of All FEARMONGERS.
I think the anon wizard is WDYT.
Ten, and who were the two candidates in your first election.
Posted by: at January 3, 2008 12:24 AM
Count back 10 elections. You may use the internet in your quiz.
It makes me laugh how people with IQ's smaller than their shoe size still vote.
Voila !
You get George Bush elected to two terms !
Posted by: at January 3, 2008 12:28 AM
Just as I thought, you’re a liar whose facts originate from their ass. I guess it must be getting late and mommy will soon be blowing your nose, wiping your ass and tucking you into bed soon. I don't want to keep you up to late.
Now I KNOW its WDYT. hooked him with the Gore comment
Can you provide the link to the legislation text and the roll call vote for these?
Posted by: Olby's Wig at January 3, 2008 12:20 AM
Just as I predicted, you haven't a clue.
Do u not know how to use the internet?
Do not not ever read a newspaper?
Hint: The information was in both.
Posted by: at January 3, 2008 12:30 AM
Ok, provide all the links. It should be easy for you.
(in fetal position) please stop, I donate to the ACLU and the Jimmy Carter Center, i'll vote Obama, anything, just stop with the withering attacks
(in fetal position) please stop, I donate to the ACLU and the Jimmy Carter Center, i'll vote Obama, anything, just stop with the withering attacks
Real Clear Politics Average for 12-19
President Bush Positive ratings: 35.4%
Congressional job approval: 25.0%
And I've also heard a few times that THIS Congress has had Historic All Time Lows.
No Congress has ever polled this bad.
No Republican Congress has ever polled this bad.
This Democratic lead Congress. The lowest! The worst! Ever! Since polls were first ever taken.
But it's all George Bush's fault.
And how much Kool-aid did we have tonight?
I guess anyone who names himself "Olby's Wig" when he doesn't have one, can't help to live a lie.
Posted by: at January 3, 2008 12:47 AM
The fact that you can't provide links to back your assertions proves to me that you are nothing more than a loud mouth adolescent for whom maturity is nowhere on the horizon. Let me ask you something Einstein, if you did possess the acumen to provide a link for those votes, where can one find the link for congressional legislation and roll call votes? Take your time with a response. There are no bonus points for incomplete answers of ad hominem.
I'll side with law and common decency.
The wingnuts will side with anything their right wing pundits tell them.
Good night.
Posted by: at January 3, 2008 12:58 AM
See Ya Punk, don't let the door hit you in your ass on the way out!!!
Tell Olbermoron that liberals with their environmentalists extremism caused the oil shortage. There is so much oil sitting off the US coast, that we can phase out Iranian oil for decades but because the Dems are toadies for Greenpiss, they'll never let us use it.
"This Democratic lead Congress. The lowest! The worst! Ever! Since polls were first ever taken"
What Puck is not telling you is that the congresional Democrats are polling consideribly higher than Republicans in congress.
What Puck is not telling you is that the congresional Democrats are polling consideribly higher than Republicans in congress.
Posted by: at January 3, 2008 1:22 AM
Source?