I'm sure KO can prove it...after all the "New Murrow" would just make up a charge like that without being able to prove it right?..I mean only an unethical journalist would do something like that not someone who claims to be the rebirth of Edward R.Murrow...right?

Yeah, like all the other fables he spins for his minion of loons.

Fox News Watch was the only show on Fox I hated and it was solely because Eric Burns let Neil Gabler shoot his big, stupid mouth off. The show is about reporting on the news and yet Gabler always interjected his own personal hatred for George Bush and Conservatives. The man says the press is conservative. This man is nuttier than Olbyturd.

Before that if was Jeff Cohen, another left wing nut job.

Both were/are middle 50's with their salt and pepper hair and beards that made me want to throw up just looking at them decay. Both know more about what teh American people go through than Ted Kennedy. The only bead of sweat Ted Kennedy ever raised on his brow was humping on some high classes prostitute in DC.

I hope Fox cancelled the entire show.

Today, democrats head to the polls in VA, MD and DC. According to Imus and Rivera, if Obama Bin Laden doesn't pull 100 percent of the vote then all the white people are racists.

Hum?

I guess the nearly 90% of the blacks that vote for Hussein are voting because he is the better candidate.

We are about to witness a train wreck.

Our nation is abou to be shed of the clintons.

Caught an ad last night for the new Larry the Cable Guy movie, "Wittless Protection". In the clip they showed your average sperm spitoon telling Larry "I'll be off in an hour". An amsued Larry replies laughing, "It won't take that long".

Hum.

Keith Olbyturd upon getting a tip for the $5 tip he gave to the hot dog vendor at Yankee Stadium about the new hooker working at the local Hyatt:

Hooker: Oh, Keithy, I get off in two minutes.

Olbyturd: What a coincidence, I just happen to have two dollars, two inches of solid manhood and two minutes to spare".

Keith Olbermahn spewed: "They'll (Fox) soon be underwriting anonymous slander blogs about you"

Keith is completely delusional. He should double-up on those trips to the psychotherapist.

Yeah Keith, Roger Ailes is funding this site. What a hoot.

Since when have Bob or Johnny been "anonymous"?

Only that ridiculous jerk would characterize as "unbalanced" tv shows that do have both conservative and liberal guests.

Has he seen own guest list?...

anonymous slander blogs? maybe olby hasn't figured out how to scroll down to the contributors section....very anonymous indeed.

So let me get this straight:

KO is complaining that Fox News underwrites anonymous slander blogs (plural).

This site has identified main bloggers J$ and Mr. Cox, so I do not see it as an anonymous blog.

Either Fox News is underwriting at least 2 OTHER blogs about KO, or Keith is lying. Again....

We're paid for this by Fox News? Did I miss the meeting on that because I've never received any sort of compensation of any form for my contributions to this blog unless of course you count the immense personal satisfaction and amusement I get for showing Olbermann to be a liar and hypocrite of the worst kind. And that Mr. Olbermann is sufficent renumeration for me.

And Anonymous? Aren't there names of the contributors of this blog right to the left of this comment screen? yet another Olbermann lie exposed.

Robert, I don't know if you have seen this yet but Stephen Spruiell at NRO saw your video of Olbermann using Shusters favorite word and actually called the president of communications Allison Gollust at NBC. She had no comment. Here is the link.

http://media.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YjY0ODU2NzM0OGQ2MGY0ZTZiMTQ3MTQwNjFiNjFjODM=

Oh no....Olbermann lost to Grace again in that all imortant key demo AND total viewers on Friday......

http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/ratings/the_scoreboard_friday_feb_8_77277.asp

###
I guess his defense of the brand, MSNBC, was not a ratings booster.

Is it time for another Special Comment?.....Hey I got a great idea....Olbermann should endorse a candidate for president.

That would go along with the theme at MSNBC for unprofessional behavior and bias!

Its funny how OlberLimp lies about OW's "underwriters," yet his puppet masters at Media Matter and Kos are being underwritten by comrade Soros.

you HYPOCRITE

By the way, since we know that Limpy (opps, I mean Keithy) reads OW, I have a message for him:

Besides your 457 regular viewers, anyone who knows anything about you knows that your a hate filled, FAR left wing hack and you'll be remembered more for this (and also your lack of sexual prowess) than being a "news host."

Keith Olbermann, the woooorrrrrst hypocrite in the woooorrrrrllllld.

Forced myself to watch the second showing of Herr Olbergoebbels "show". It's like that movie "GroundHog Day". It's the same show over and over and over. Waited for the first guest to see if he had anyone new, and it was that pencil necked geek, Richard Wolffe, you know, macho man. Noticed him and Olbergoebbels have the same glasses. I guess gay guys really do shop together. Rest of the show was typical spin,spin, and more spin. Then he's got the "Fixed News" logo in the background and calling Fox "Fixed", and I'm thinking, "That's the pot calling the kettle black, ain't it?" Shuster gets a suspension for reporting in a fixed manner for Obama, and our favorite orange-kraut, Herr Olbergoebbels, defends his ass buddy...The Fascist retard writes for a far left bomb-thrower site like DailyKos, and he's not in the tank for the far left? Is that not the definition of "Fixed"? He's really either completely unhinged or as dumb as a fucking rock. Said a crack about the president like he's some all knowing seer,with that shit eating look on his orange face, and I'm thinking Bush wouldn't piss on this asshole. Bill O'Reilly is even taking the wind out of NBC at this point. I own a LOT of GE stock, and what this staion of moonbats is doing is scaring the shit out of me as far as my investment. Vanguard fund is likely as the fascist communists take NBC to the brink....Heil Olbergoebbels!!! Heil to the Fuhrer, George Soros. Olbergoebbels' show is fixed into that treasonous and seditious Hungarian Jew son of a bitch, who pretended not to be a Jew during the war, and helped confiscate Jewish propety as it was seized by the Third Reich. Now he heads the Fourth Reich to make sure Jews and Israelis are destroyed yet again. See David Horowitz book about communists in our modern society. The guy used to be a total lefty, so he ought to know.Seig Heil!!!Heil Olbergoebbels!!!!MSNBC uber alles!!!!!!!

And Jesus sayeth unto Olbergoebbels," Do not point out the splinter in your brother's eye when there's a tree growing inside your orange fucking head". An orange joke...... Hey Kweef, go ahead and have another one of your friends send you some more fake Anthrax..Your ratings suck pretty bad, you could use some help. Maybe mail it to yourself during sweeps week...........Maybe send Tang so it matches your head.....

I'm going to end up deleting posts like the one from sheik due to language issues. Folks here know that so I'm not sure why they keep doing it. So, sheik now's your chance to copy, cleanup, paste and report. I will check back later and delete the above version

Bob, the poor little FLUCKER just caint hep himself.

He is compelled to more and more outrageous comments from every side of the aisle until somebody, anybody, pays him some attention. It is all about attention, good or bad.

Booty, this is the last attention you get from me.

Grammie

Robert,

Phony Soldier walks a very fine line.

if you check you will see that I've already deleted phony soldier's comments.

I knew it! J.D. & Robert have been holding out!

Where's my cut?

I'll settle for two NJ Devils Tickets.

So FNC is underwriting this eh?

Maybe this is Olby's ploy to bring in the 'Conspiracy Nut Job' Crowd?

What did that one puff peace say? His office looks right at the Fox building?

Since he only does an hour a day. He must have a lot of time to look at that building.

HA!

Mr. Cox, my apologies. Feel free to delete above posts. I will herein lay off the salty language, but I hope it's still okay to call our friend by the name of Olbergoebbels. No disrespect due to you or your site.

Mr. Cox, I just wanted to commend you for doing a great job. I shall put your fat check in the mail tomorrow because we know that only a huge corporation like NewsCorp would be funding a website that dares to critize OlberLimp.

By the way, maybe I should consider increasing your funding since Fox is only beating Countdown by a margin of 3 to 1.

Mr. Murdoch

Mr. Cox, my apologies. Feel free to delete above posts. I will herein lay off the salty language, but I hope it's still okay to call our friend by the name of Olbergoebbels. No disrespect due to you or your site.

Posted by: sheikyerbouti420 at February 12, 2008 4:30 PM

What you can or can't do is between you and Bob, but between you and me, it's my opinion that the name is stupid as hell...

What you can or can't do is between you and Bob, but between you and me, it's my opinion that the name is stupid as hell...

Posted by: Cecelia at February 12, 2008 4:54 PM

I think he is mocking one of the names of a known terrorist. Just a guess.

I think he is mocking one of the names of a known terrorist. Just a guess.

Posted by: olby sucks at February 12, 2008 5:18 PM

Your naiveté is very touching, OS.

Maybe he likes Frank Zappa.

*yawn*

Question for Keith. If this is a "slander site", why don't you sue Robert Cox? How exactly does this site slander Kieth Olbermann?

Factor, have you no pity for poor KO?

The poor boy couldn't win a slander suit in England, much less the US!

Grammie

Your naiveté is very touching, OS.

Posted by: Cecelia at February 12, 2008 5:30 PM

I know what the 420 means. The first part is a word play on a terrorist. Someone on the radio, I don't remember who, used to call one of the gitmo guests "shake your booty." Like I said, mockery. I could be wrong, though.

Yeah.. KO is worried about what some insignificant hack like Johnny Two Cents or Mr. Dick have to say about a damn thing. You would think that if this blog gets hits there would be some way for the fighting keyboard brigade would be able to strangle a few dimes out of it.

I wonder if the fact that KeithO is onto this blog has anything to do with my Olbermann Watch paycheck from Fox News being late. Anyone else not get their check last friday? Cecilia? Factor? Grammie? Did your checks show up on time?

Oh yeah Keithey- you are the biggest loser on TV next to rosie Odonnel and Sherri on the view. Maybe you could get your own show and spew idiocy in surround sound.

Benson, I had no idea that I was entitled to some moola.

I thought I was here just being the sweet, kind, loving, gray haired Grammie passing out cookies and juice.

Who do I contact to get my share PLUS the interest on it? :)

Grammie

Thank you, thank you thank you Bobo.

I don't know how I lasted this long without knowing this pearl of wisdom:

"You are wrong. 420 represents 4:20 in the afternoon. The international "get high" time of the day."

Grammie

Temper, temper, temper Bobo.

Although I must say that I am glad that you are not emulating The Big bad wolf in Grandma drag still.

BTW, whatever secret knowledge you have about my liver please share. I don't think about it for months and years on end.

Grammie

OS, Bobo is not only an expert on drugs but as he just demonstrated an expert on my liver.

If only he would share his knowledge with me.

After all, it is MY LIVER he is talking about.

Grammie

Does anyone have any proof whatsoever that KO is referring to this blog?

Seems like delusions of grandeur to me.

Well this is the blog Olbermann himself reads and has repeatedly mentioned. Why, what blog do YOU think he was referring to?

You're right Johnny.

It MUST'VE been this one. There is no other explanation in the universe.

Repeat: what blog do YOU think he was referring to? Care to answer this time?

"The republicans are on the ong side of ALL of the major issues."

Ring a bell?

"The republicans are on the wrong side of ALL of the major issues."

Ring a bell?

Really?
There are some nasty ones before this post.

Its funny with all his warnings he still doesn't get banned though.

Posted by: at February 13, 2008 10:02 AM

I couldn't care less about Phony. He's a piece of shit.

Posted by: at February 13, 2008 1:02 PM

Is the above post supposed to show hypocrisy? With all of the hypocrisy out here you'd think you'd all be complete masters of the art.

What I did say was that it was a joke that he is allowed to stay based on his posts.

Repeat: what blog do YOU think he was referring to? Care to answer this time?

Posted by: johnny dollar at February 13, 2008 12:18 PM

Let me get this straight...
You claim that Olbermann was referencing OW in his spiel, although he never mentioned it by name. That is your claim, not mine.

Then I say that there is not ONE IOTA of PROOF that he was referencing this site, and you ask ME to tell you who I think he's referencing.

So, if I don't come up with an answer to YOUR claim it means you must be right?
Is that how this works?
How about a shred of PROOF that he was talking about this site? Since you made the claim, the proof is YOUR burden, not mine.

J$, aren't you supposed to be some kind of lawyer?

> I say that there is not ONE IOTA of PROOF that he was referencing this site

An "iota of proof"? What in the wide world of sports does that mean? Proof doesn't come in iotas. Proof resolves a question. Maybe you meant to say an "iota of evidence"? At least that would make linguistic sense, even if it is just as factually ignorant as "iota of proof".

Would you care to know how many times he has attacked Olbermann watch on air and in print? More than you can count on your hands.

Would you like to know how many times he has attacked ANY other Olbermann blog? Try zero. Try square root of zero.

Oh, would you like to even POINT to any other Olbermann blog that is critical of him? Wouldn't that, like, leave only ONE possibility as to who he's talking about?

Your argument is like saying: "There's a moon out tonight". "Oh yeah, what moon is that? PROVE it's our moon. He could be talking about Phoebus or some moon near ALpha Centauri. There's not ONE IOTA OF PROOF that the guy means that big ol' moon up there in the sky, the ONLY big ol' moon up there in the sky."

If that's what you're reduced to arguing, you just might be an Olbypologist.

"Oh really? Would you care to know how many times he has attacked Olbermann watch on air and in print? More than you can count on your hands."

***Does that offer any proof he's referring to you now? NOPE.

"Would you like to know how many times he has attacked ANY other Olbermann blog? Try zero. Try square root of zero."

***Does that offer any proof he's referring to you now? NOPE.

"Oh, would you like to even POINT to any other Olbermann blog that is critical of him? Wouldn't that, like, leave only ONE possibility as to who he's talking about?"

***It is not my position to point to anything to knock down your assertion. Your position is to PROVE what you claim. Does that offer any proof he's referring to you now? NOPE.

"Your argument is like saying: "There's a moon out tonight". "Oh yeah, what moon is that? PROVE it's our moon. He could be talking about Phoebus or some moon near ALpha Centauri. There's not ONE IOTA OF PROOF that the guy means that big ol' moon up there in the sky, the ONLY big ol' moon up there in the sky."

***Umm, my argument is NOTHING like that.
Olbermann in no way referenced this site. IN NO WAY. There are MILLIONS of blog sites on the net.
MILLIONS.
For you to infer that he was referencing you, without being named, is a point YOU have to support. That is something you CAN NOT DO, except for in your own head.

"If that's what you're reduced to arguing, you just might be an Olbypologist."

***Oh, I see how it goes. I prove to you that your "proof" is non-existant, and I am an Olbypologist. Great work counselor.

Posted by: johnny dollar at February 13, 2008 1:43 PM

Great job 2:04.
Very insightful and profound.

> For you to infer that he was referencing you, without being named, is a point YOU have to support.

Why?

> I prove to you that your "proof" is non-existant

Again you demonstrate how you don't know the difference between evidence and proof. Get out your Funk & Wagnalls and look up the two words. Once you are educated, perhaps you will understand.

> You claim that Olbermann was referencing OW in his spiel, although he never mentioned it by name. That is your claim, not mine.

I claimed that? Where? Since you are so adamant about "proof" perhaps you can provide "proof" that I made that claim. In fact, I'll go about it the correct way. Please provide "evidence" that I ever said that. You insist it is my "claim", so quote me back.

I won't hold my breath waiting for that quote. Because to an Olbypologist, the only people who never have to provide "proof" are Olbypologists.

Usually I let my sons fend for themselves, and even though they always get beat it's not the winning or losing that is important to me, but most importantly is in how my cells prove that they are true enemies of America.

This I have seen over and over again on this site, and their unpatriotism warms my heart, but with this last argument between the one known as Johnny dollar and my most uninformed anonymous, I must ask my little boy anonymous to come back to my cave for a refresher course on how to spread my word.

His analogy of the moon kind of said it all, like how you Americans would say when in losing a debate "blew your doors off," and I feel it best that you anonymous come back to Pakistan (you know the cave) as quick as you can!

It is one thing to spread my word for me through lies and the like, but it is a whole other thing when you are made to look like a guppy when being confronted by a white shark.

Don't take it too hard my little minion, as we have had many defeats before, but I must stop the slaughter before it becomes a routine with you.

Lately, our defeats have been fast and furious, and the most obvious one has been to my Keithy with his references of displeasure to this site, but any form of denial from my cells about this blatant mistake by the one known as Olbermann only causes us more harm.

Retreat for now my little anonymous, and I will re-program you for the better.

Akuba!!! Ayeeee!!!!

Ouch, right in the back! No loyalty, whatsoever, in the (d) party.

Clinton Ex-Campaign Manager Backs Obama!

Feb 13 11:00 AM US/Eastern
By PHILIP ELLIOTT
Associated Press Writer

>>>
Great job 2:04.
Very insightful and profound.

Posted by: at February 13, 2008 2:08 PM

How's that egg taste?

There is generally little point in explaining things to OlbyLoons so not for their sake but for new readers who might come across this discussion thread let me address the absurd comments to the effect that Keith is doing something other than referring to Olbermann Watch in this most recent anti-free speech rant.

This blog has been around since 2004. Keith has been quoted in The New York Observer talking about me. At the time he listed me and other person as the only two bloggers he read regularly (obviously that has changed). He has complained about Olbermann Watch and/or me by name in The Hartford Courant, to Howard Kurtz of the Washington Post/CNN in a joint radio interview they did, he has made, through third-parties some vague noises about bringing legal action involving this site. If you go back and read the reporting on Keith's famous Nazi Salute you will learn that we had a direct role in that as well on two fronts - that Keith's salute was made in the context of answering a question about his attacks on Bill O'Reilly; Olbermann was later condemned for Nazi salute by the ADL. The question he was asked was from the TV Critic from the Kansas City Star. What he asked him about was the Olbermann Watch "count" of KO attacks on Bill O'Reilly. At that time we had just announced Keith's 100th attack on O'Reilly. I sent that post to various people including the TV critic at the Star who worked it into his question to Keith and prompted to Keith to expound on this site, on O'Reilly and Fox News ultimately culminating in him donning the Bill O'Reilly "mask" and giving the Nazi salute. Now, Keith has previously stated that the salute was a pre-planned "stunt" intended to be humorous so I am not saying he gave the Nazi Salute BECAUSE of Olbermann Watch only that the take off point he had been waiting for in the press conference was the question he got about our "100th Attack" post.

The ADL was made aware of Keith's Nazi Salute by me. I sent them the picture, links to the reporting, and our posts about it. Even our critics at Daily Kos know this, have written about it, and attacked me by name for having done it.

On many other occasions he has made thinly veiled references to this site such as, and I am paraphrasing, a "site that gets no traffic" and "a site intended to mock me" etc. He did it again recently on Daily Kos. He did it the other night on Countdown.

As regular readers know, I am the world's leading authority on Keith Olbermann web sites. If you look down the left rail, you will will see that I am widely recognized as a KO expert; I am an oft-quoted source for stories on Keith Olbermann - American Journalism Review, PBS, LA Times, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Washington Post, Online Journalism Review, etc.

As a world-renowned authority on Keith Olbermann I can tell you without doubt that (a) Keith regularly monitors this site; (b) he hangs on my every word and desperately seeks my approval; (c) there are very few "Keith Olbermann web sites" on the Internet; (d) of those few, Olbermann Watch is the only such site among them that is anything other than a fangirl site.

Therefore, when Keith references a web site devoted to "slander" against him he is referring to THIS site.

On top of this, and obviously this the single most important factor, I am of the opinion that Keith is referencing this site. Given my track record for deep insight and accuracy when it comes to reading the moods, the motives and the implications of every utterance of Keith Olbermann no clear-thinking person could question my conclusion with regard to this issue.

I trust that clears things up for new readers. As for the OlbyLoons, I know nothing critical of Keith will ever penetrate your pea-sized intellect (unless it is that he is in the bag for one Democrat over another) so do not feel compelled to explain why you do not accept this reply. I already know that you don't and am not particularly interested.

"I claimed that? Where? Since you are so adamant about "proof" perhaps you can provide "proof" that I made that claim. In fact, I'll go about it the correct way. Please provide "evidence" that I ever said that. You insist it is my "claim", so quote me back."

***Uhh... Maybe the title of the thread??
Since you are defending the notion that the thread is supporting, my guess is that you support the TITLE of the thread.

"I won't hold my breath waiting for that quote. Because to an Olbypologist, the only people who never have to provide "proof" are Olbypologists."

***Again, no proof whatsoever that Olbermann was referencing this site. Thanks for playing.

Posted by: johnny dollar at February 13, 2008 2:12 PM

Therefore, when Keith references a web site devoted to "slander" against him he is referring to THIS site.

Posted by: Robert Cox at February 13, 2008 2:34 PM

Beautifully said Robert.
Except, he never mentioned this site, and you are delusional if you think what you've stated is any sort of proof.

How's that egg taste?

Posted by: at February 13, 2008 2:18 PM

OW, home of the delusional, clairvoyant, Tourette's patients.

> my guess is...

Your guess? Your GUESS? The Olbypologist post after post whines about NOT ONE IOTA OF PROOF, and when asked to pony up some of his own, he replies with: it's my "guess". Hahaaahaaaaaa!

> ***Uhh... Maybe the title of the thread??

Uhh, can you even READ? There's no point debating with someone who can't even tell the truth about who wrote something.

His analogy of the moon kind of said it all, like how you Americans would say when in losing a debate "blew your doors off," and I feel it best that you anonymous come back to Pakistan (you know the cave) as quick as you can!

Posted by: Osama Bin Laden at February 13, 2008 2:17 PM

The analogy of the moon blew my doors off?
An analogy is proof now?

Here in OW it is!!
Nothing short of him uttering the words "OLBERMANN WATCH" would be proof that he is talking about this blog.

There are millions of blogs out there people. My guess is that 99.999999% of the people that go online have no FRICKIN CLUE what Olbermannwatch is.
Yet, you all refer to it like it is a household name and it is the only site KO could've been referencing.

Pretty funny.

"I don't know what the hell you're talking about re: borders. I've never made any assertions to that on this blog. You must have me confused with someone else.

Imagine that, one of you making a mistake.

Posted by: at February 13, 2008 1:02 PM "

The advantage of posting as a Chicken Blogger is in being able to deny that you were the particular Chicken who clucked something specific.

The disadvantage is that anyone can logically conclude that all the clucking by Chicken Blogger belongs to you and there no way for you to dispute it.

Just b/c you want to be able to weasel out from responsibility for your own words doesn't mean that everyone else is going to roll over and play dead for you.

Grammie

"Nothing short of him uttering the words "OLBERMANN WATCH" would be proof that he is talking about this blog."

Hey, crazy larry, this is the only one that criticises him. Get it, now?

Trollgirl wrote:

"Nothing short of him uttering the words "OLBERMANN WATCH" would be proof that he is talking about this blog."

Really? So, if I make a comment referring to "the far-left, former jock-sniffer posing as newsman on a third-rate cable news channel" that would not be "proof" that I am referencing Keith Olbermann.

"There are millions of blogs out there people. My guess is that 99.999999% of the people that go online have no FRICKIN CLUE what Olbermannwatch is".

I would not disagree that only a small number of people who go online know about Olbermann Watch. That said, .0000001% of all of the people who go online is still a very large number of people and any blog would kill to have that much traffic. More to the point, among readers of political/media blogs Olbermann Watch is very well known. This site gets over 100,000 unique visitors a month, is regularly linked by other blogs including some of the biggest in the blogosphere and is regularly cited in media reports about Keith Olbermann.

"Yet, you all refer to it like it is a household name and it is the only site KO could've been referencing."

This comment is not only inane but illustrates the problem in a Keith Olbermann Expert like me engaging in any sort of discussion with an uninformed Olbyloon. First, Olbermann Watch being or not being a "household name" is irrelevant. What IS relevant is whether Olbermann Watch is known in Keith Olbermann's household. Even his biggest fangirls would agree that Keith Olbermann is obsessed with Keith Olbermann. He has given interviews where he discusses reading about himself, Googling himself, etc. Newspaper reporters have related accounts of Keith calling them to complain about an article they've written about him. More to the point, Keith Olbermann has attacked this site and me by name on numerous occasions AND on many occasions been asked about this site by reporters (generally he refuses to comment and, in one case I know of, refused to grant an interview to a report who admitted he had already interviewed me for the article). Given this there is NO DOUBT that Olbermann Watch IS a "household name" in the only house that matters - Keith's house.

Therefore, consider the facts in the context of Keith's remarks...

1) Keith is very familiar with the Olbermann Watch blog.

2) Olbermann Watch is one of a small number of "Keith Olbermann" blogs or web sites.

3) Olbermann Watch is the only site among them which is critical of Keith.

4) Keith has attacked Olbermann Watch and its editor by name in the press on numerous occasions

5) Keith has attacked Olbermann Watch and its editor without specifically using names in the press on numerous occasions.

Given this there is no other possible conclusion other than Keith was referencing Olbermann Watch.

Given this there is no other possible conclusion other than Keith was referencing Olbermann Watch.

Posted by: Robert Cox at February 13, 2008 4:29 PM

All of your blustering in fact PROVES NOTHING, and you know it.

Thanks for trying though.

All of your blustering in fact PROVES NOTHING, and you know it.

Thanks for trying though.

Posted by: at February 13, 2008 5:07 PM

Can you name ONE other possibility? You can't and you know it.

Would crazy marry be more fitting than crazy larry? Sorry if I offended you by referring to you as a male. Please accept my apology.

Concrete is less dense than some of these clowns.

Cecelia,

My posts are not for the benefit of the OlbyLoons but rather for those new readers who might not know what an OlbyLoon is - someone who will, for instance, blindly deny the obvious when they believe the obvious somehow damaging to the object of their infatuation.

My posts are not for the benefit of the OlbyLoons but rather for those new readers who might not know what an OlbyLoon is - someone who will, for instance, blindly deny the obvious when they believe the obvious somehow damaging to the object of their infatuation.

Posted by: Robert Cox at February 13, 2008 5:59 PM

MY infatuation?

You're the one with the Olbermann website. You're the one that wrote:

"As regular readers know, I am the world's leading authority on Keith Olbermann web sites. If you look down the left rail, you will will see that I am widely recognized as a KO expert; I am an oft-quoted source for stories on Keith Olbermann - American Journalism Review, PBS, LA Times, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Washington Post, Online Journalism Review, etc.

As a world-renowned authority on Keith Olbermann I can tell you without doubt that (a) Keith regularly monitors this site; (b) he hangs on my every word and desperately seeks my approval; (c) there are very few "Keith Olbermann web sites" on the Internet; (d) of those few, Olbermann Watch is the only such site among them that is anything other than a fangirl site."

But I'M infatuated.

More stupidity, more absence of any proof whatsoever.

OS, you wouldn't by any chance be RK would you?

Just asking. Thanks in advance.

OS, you wouldn't by any chance be RK would you?

Just asking. Thanks in advance.

Posted by: OlbyWatch fan at February 13, 2008 7:22 PM

MR OBERMAN IS ONE OF THE BEST NEWS COMENTATOR AND REPORTER .
I ONLY WATCH HIS NEWS .
HE HAS GUTS AND HUMOR .
THEA SCHLOSSER

AUTHOR ,BEYOND THE DARK CLOUD ,-CFIDS-FIBROMYALGIA

But I'M infatuated.

More stupidity, more absence of any proof whatsoever.
Posted by: at February 13, 2008 6:48 PM

Why would you assume that Bob was referencing YOU?

He didn't quote any of your posts.

Prove that he meant you....

Why Cecilia, it's his "guess". He's permitted to guess all he wants, you know. That's the privilege of being an Olbyloon.

Why Cecilia, it's his "guess". He's permitted to guess all he wants, you know. That's the privilege of being an Olbyloon.

Posted by: johnny dollar at February 13, 2008 8:40 PM

As I suppose is the facility to imagine that Keith meant that Rupert Murdoch was financing all those OTHER anti-Olbermann blogs out there...

If you consider OBTUSENESS to be a legitimate and logical argument.... YOU MIGHT JUST BE AN OLBYLOON...

Why Cecilia, it's his "guess". He's permitted to guess all he wants, you know. That's the privilege of being an Olbyloon.

Posted by: johnny dollar at February 13, 2008 8:40 PM

Olbyloon? I'm actually not a fan of Olbermann's either. I won't ask you to prove anywhere that I've ever said otherwise, because I don't have 4 1/2 hours to debate it, only for you to read my mind for me.

One would think that a person would be able to come up with just ONE other possibility when insinuating Olby WASN'T talking about this blog, right?

Come on why, can't you fine ONE other anti-olbermann blog that your hero could have been referring to? Just ONE?

> I watched it three times.

Ooh, that must have been a big night, eh? Was it good for you?

"Anonymous" slander blog, when RCox himself states that the names of the contributors are available for all to see?
Wouldn't that discredit your argument?
Or are you only seeing what you want?

O'Reilly/Golberg - proof about Olbermann
WPITW segment - NO proof about OW

Posted by: at February 13, 2008 11:25 PM

Olbermann called it an "anonymous" blog because he believes Murdoch funds the blog anonymously.

You've already shown that you're willing to contradict what little commonsense that you have in your false admission of...well, Cecelia, you're right..maybe Bob didn't mean me, since he didn't designate me specifically when he wrote that post about Olbyloons... (when Bob obviously did).

If stupidity is the price you're willing to pay to support Olbermann or to oppose Bob Cox, well have at it. It seems to come easily to you.

This thread is now closed!