To Olby, bipartisan means left-wing and ultra left-wing.

watching Fox of course. Here's rooting for a nice big Hitlery-Hussein tie!

I wonder how much of this money is from terrorist organizations. Things that make you go, hmmmmm.

Obama also plans to announce he raised more than $50 million in February, considerably more than Clinton’s $35 million.

Just watched Huckabee and McCain .... For what it is worth, th Republicans nominated the poorer of the speakers. Of course, the standards for Republican oraory are not exactly high. And, while I realize that McCain is of a grandfatherly, indeed great grandfatherly way, this "lecture to the kids" style is going to get old fast. Of course, now that the Republican establishment is begrudgingly behind McCain, I am sure the style will change.

How will the substance play? I suppose that remains to be seen. Certainly, aside from "let's stay in Iraq forever," there isn't much actual substance. A bit more clarity on women's and reproductive rights (against both), perhaps, than on economic and trade issues. Will this placate the Rightous Right? Yes, in the sense they will not go elsewhere. But, will they vote? Certainly not with the intensity of the past when Reagan, Bush I and Bush II have gone to such lengths to pander to this group. I don't expect McCain to be able to do this nearly as comfortably. And, they may not hold the key as they once did in any event.

This is the election which may finlly recognize the real but hidden for the last three) demographic, Hispanics. There is no question but that McCain's relations with Hispanics have been better than that of other Republicans. Not saying much there, of course .... But he is going to have to carry the water of the immigrant bashers like Cornyn and Kyl. That will be tough....

We then have the intangible. We had a preview with Clinton I/Dole, the young, dynamic speaker v. the tired, dull speaker. This may be an inspirational election. Those happen from time-to-time.

For the next 4-6 weeks, McCain will surge, then the deluge. I expect it will be a dramatic fall. A fall must be broken, and it is not clear McCain will have the stamina to do it.

Interesting times, ahead ....

Thanks for that......

Posted by: at March 4, 2008 10:44 PM

Neither a Woman nor a Black will win the General Election, regardless.

"maddow drinks a lot," tell us something we don't know, Brian!

Interesting e-mail from Fox News (#1)

"In Iraq, voters walked over land mines and got shot at to get to the voting booth. In Ohio, they can't even drive in the rain to go vote!"

Interesting times, ahead ....
Posted by: at March 4, 2008 10:44 PM

You know it....

Every African-American I've encountered: "I'd rather stay home than support Hillary now"...

I suspect by "every African-American I've encountered," you are referring to you maid. She'll probably change her mind.

"Hill-a-ry, Hill-a-ry, Hill-a-ry!" Go Hillary!

suspect by "every African-American I've encountered," you are referring to you maid. She'll probably change her mind.
Posted by: at March 4, 2008 11:35 PM

Live in hope... but you'd be wrong.. :D

Cecelia, the African-Americans are voting on race, alone. Don't let them fool you.

And, you know African-Americans are "voting on race, alone" exactly how, Jeff? Did Dr. Wiener tell you that? Thought so. Don't pass on useless information.

exactly how, Jeff?

The same way you know that Cecelia has a black maid..........How's that for an answer, smart ass?

It's ON like DONKEY KONG ladies! Hitlery wins Ohio AND texas! Look for vicious attacks to reign supreme as two grotesque leftists battle for the power they crave.

There can be only ONE!

Ha ha ha ha ha hahahahahahahahaha!

Poor Olbermann -- which master will he need to serve? How can he plan his show if he doesn't know whose ass to properly kiss! Oh the horror -- will our hero have to crawl back under his desk? Perhaps the bathtub?

Pretty poor answer, Jeff. I am sure that the only African Americans the Gang of Five ever "encounter" are maids and janitors. None of you would have an African-American doctor or lawyer, and none of your country clubs admit African-Americans.

You're far too easy. Somehow, you were more articulate as Royal King. I'd advise you to go back to it, after consulting with your attorney, of course, or move onto another name.

Ok, philby.

So Hillary wins 3 out of 4 states tonight: Rhode Island , Ohio and Texas.
Hillary pointed out obvious faults with Obama and people listened.

What will MSNBC do now? Chris Matthews and Keith Olbermann who haven't hid the fact that they want Obama to win and despise Hillary, will have to eat crow.

Hillary will continue to go negative on Obama and after tonight Obama will fire back.
This will give McCain an early advantage as both Hillary and Obama gripe with each other and give McCain nice material he can use.

McCain can also pick his running mate so they both start taking shots at Hillary and Obama on the sidelines.

Keith will continue his attacks on Hillary hoping to sway his small viewer ship.
I just hope somebody in the Hillary camp notices olbermann and calls him out on this.

I'd say it's 50-50 Keith's off on Wednesday to avoid having to deal with the direct consequences of reporting Tuesday's primary results. Then he's going to have to start stratgeriizing his plans for the period between now and the Pennsylvania primary -- stay tight with the Kos crowd and continue to treat Hillary like a Republican, or take a step or two back from the ledge and write a little more even-handed copy for the two candidates, just in case Hillary does come back to win the nomination.

Of course, if she does Olby will pretend that none of the things he's said over the past two month ever happened, and he was with Bill and Hill 110 percent all along, just as his past support for Mrs. Clinton vanished when the Obama craze really hit after the Iowa caucuses. It's like watching Frank Burns or Larry Tate reincarnated as a TV newscaster.

Or maybe Eddie Haskell.

Posted by Chicken Blogger:

"Pretty poor answer, Jeff. I am sure that the only African Americans the Gang of Five ever "encounter" are maids and janitors. None of you would have an African-American doctor or lawyer, and none of your country clubs admit African-Americans.

Posted by: at March 5, 2008 12:07 AM"

I have been ignoring these blanket accusations of racism by our pathologically intolerant friends, the non-progressive anti-liberals known here as KO fans. It does get tiresome, though.

What evidence do you base this charge on other than your own sick fantisies? Upon what do you base your assumption that those who disagree with you must be Aryan Nation types?

There is a substantial record here at OW of years of comments [from the so called "Gang of Five" per you] that can be used as evidence, if indeed it is there, to prove your point.

Put up or shut up.

I don't know what world you're living in that prompts such statements but it's not mine.

Grammie

Well, you'll have to prove that, Grammie Janet because all the evidence suggests that Cecelia, Cee, Jeff/Royal King/Olby S***s, Sharon and you are the very worst sort of racists. I am an American and a US Citizen, albeit an American who has longed lived in Europe, and I can assure that I am glad no one I know is aware of Olbermann, nor are they aware of the type of people who so frequently post here. If anyone I knew read the work of the Gang of Five, I'd be greatly embarassed by the ignorance and the intolerance exhibited by the members of this marginal group of Americans. It has been difficult enough to live through GWB, and I certainly would not want to have to apologize for the five of you.

I find it interesting that a poster will accuse me of being a racist with little to go on while a member of his party elite, and her legions, trashes and attempts to destroy the first serious African-American candidate for President of The United States.

Oh well, as a conservative, seeing the left eat their own has a certain satisfaction, however, as an American, I know the closer Clinton Co. gets to executive power the more they will play dirty and hurt our political process....like they did in the 1990's, to give us this wonderful environment we have now (along with 9/11).....

The leftist ruling class better get their act together soon or more and more normal Americans will discover that these fools are not capable of governing and have no intention of doing what is best for our country....Time is running out!

Weep, faint then weep again!

ANON writes:

"Just watched Huckabee and McCain .... For what it is worth, th Republicans nominated the poorer of the speakers. Of course, the standards for Republican oraory are not exactly high. And, while I realize that McCain is of a grandfatherly, indeed great grandfatherly way, this "lecture to the kids" style is going to get old fast. Of course, now that the Republican establishment is begrudgingly behind McCain, I am sure the style will change.

How will the substance play? I suppose that remains to be seen. Certainly, aside from "let's stay in Iraq forever," there isn't much actual substance. A bit more clarity on women's and reproductive rights (against both), perhaps, than on economic and trade issues. Will this placate the Rightous Right? Yes, in the sense they will not go elsewhere. But, will they vote? Certainly not with the intensity of the past when Reagan, Bush I and Bush II have gone to such lengths to pander to this group. I don't expect McCain to be able to do this nearly as comfortably. And, they may not hold the key as they once did in any event.

This is the election which may finlly recognize the real but hidden for the last three) demographic, Hispanics. There is no question but that McCain's relations with Hispanics have been better than that of other Republicans. Not saying much there, of course .... But he is going to have to carry the water of the immigrant bashers like Cornyn and Kyl. That will be tough....

We then have the intangible. We had a preview with Clinton I/Dole, the young, dynamic speaker v. the tired, dull speaker. This may be an inspirational election. Those happen from time-to-time.

For the next 4-6 weeks, McCain will surge, then the deluge. I expect it will be a dramatic fall. A fall must be broken, and it is not clear McCain will have the stamina to do it.

Interesting times, ahead ...."

END QUOTE

1. Better speaker? For what it's worth? Um, most anyone with an IQ over a chimp looks past a simple speech most politicians didn't even write.

2. The US ranks near 30 in reding and math skills.

3. Fox and Friends were at Ohio U. the past two mornings. This morning Frank Luntz had a group pulled out for Obama. Nearly all could not list one thing Obama did in Washington. I heard remarks like, "He's good looking", "He's honest", "he stands for hope", "He represents our generation".

Guess they haven't heard about Rezko or NAFTA on the left wing nut job media they frequent.

And I am to be impressed by what you wrote?

Juan writes:

"Neither a Woman nor a Black will win the General Election, regardless."

END QUOTE

That's is right for this election.

But, I say a black or a woman will be president oneday but they will be a Republican. There is nothing to Barack. If Harold Ford Jr. was really a stand up guy he would see how his party has evolved into a left wing nut job factory and turn republican and he would have a chance. I voted for Liz Dole and helped put Irskin Bowles out of politics the last in 04 when I voted against him again. He's now president of UNC, the college that makes new incoming freshmen read the Kuran.

Grammie,

I wonder how the troll jerk knows my race? Or the race of all of my family members and extended family? He is such an ignoramus and it is so obvious he has never interacted with the African American population. Perhaps he can invent a few personalities at this point to agree with him again, or maybe some more racists that he is exceptionally good at parroting.

Oh and to troll jerk, is Harold Ford Jr. a homophobe or not? Still waiting...

ANON writes:

"And, you know African-Americans are "voting on race, alone" exactly how, Jeff? Did Dr. Wiener tell you that? Thought so. Don't pass on useless information."

END QUOTE

Damned right he knows. Ray Nagin allows 1300 people to drown because he was too stupid and too incompetent to have an disaster plan for a hurricane and gets re-elected. Congressman William Jefferson is caught on video accepting bribes in an FBI sting and the $90k used in the sting is found hid in his freezer, not only does he get re-elected, Pelosi throws him a big reception party when he gets back to DC and gives him a chairman sest on National Intelligence. Marion Barry get caught in a sting with a prostitute smiking crack and gets re-elected.

On the other hand, you may be right, some people may be too stupid to vote.

Funny, Imus said the people of TN were racists for not voting Ford to the US Senate.

Wake up Alice, this aint Wonderland.

Phony Soldier re-invented.

I completely disagree with the claim that every person who votes for Obama is voting on race alone, although it seems to be alright to state that women vote for Clinton for her gender.

"If anyone I knew read the work of the Gang of Five, I'd be greatly embarassed by the ignorance and the intolerance exhibited by the members of this marginal group of Americans."

As I said, Chicken Blogger, there are years of records to draw on to prove your point. Yet you simply repeat it with no backup.

Since you didn't, and actually can't, put up it is time for you to shut up.

Grammie

"If anyone I knew read the work of the Gang of Five, I'd be greatly embarassed by the ignorance and the intolerance exhibited by the members of this marginal group of Americans."

As I said, Chicken Blogger, there are years of records to draw on to prove your point. Yet you simply repeat it with no backup.

Since you didn't, and actually can't, put up it is time for you to shut up.

Grammie
Posted by: Janet Hawkins at March 5, 2008 8:27 AM

He can't get enough of we ignorant intolerant Americans here. A gazillion conservative and liberal blogs on the net and you couldn't push this insane clown from this one with the world's biggest broom. Our clown here is a genuine "Gang of Five" groupie, Grammie. Feel the love... :D

Olbermann is playing to future employers.

It seems that the unxious goof is trolling to be Bill Maher's Ed McMahon - that would be a goodfit.

http://hickeysite.blogspot.com/2008/03/john-mccain-johnmccain-runs-table-wins.html

What's up with Sharon? Have you formed the Harold Ford, Jr., fanclub? Sharon, the penultimate Republican, praising a Democrat when the clown that defeated Ford did so with demonstrably racist ads financed in part by the RNC. Get off your high horse gal. You have never shown the moral and ethical fortitude to set in judgment of anyone, yet you do it constantly. Get off that horse and climb into the gutter with Jeff/Royal King/Olby S***s. You'll find it a happy home I am sure.

And, Grammie Janet, no lady would tell anyone to shut up. That's nasty and rude.

Watch Olby switch to whoring for Hillary (again) after yesterday's Obama losses.

Grammie,

What a (and fill in the blank with some colorful language) our troll is. Racism is the new talking point for now for the troll, whose primary goals are attention and disruption through evoking the emotions.

I think this election cycle shows how divided we are. McCain has secured the election, but I am just amazed at the numbers Huckabee receives. Will these voters go to McCain if he chooses Huckabee as the VP? That is pretty sizable chunk of votes. Huckabee had only heart and no money. I don't care what Rico says, I like Huckabee. Every time I hear him speak, I just like him. That is not a good argument for a presidential vote, and that is why he did not get the nomination, but received a not insignificant amount of votes. Anyways, McCain has to look to appease the conservative base and the religious base, while keeping the moderates. On the democratic side, it looks like it is going to be like a close boxing match: there will be a winner but with both beaten up.

Just like F*O*X* switched from whoring to Guiliani to Romney to Huckabee to McCain, I assume? Cable news ain't pretty, is it?

The nice thing about the democrat party nomination is that now, neither Obamessiah and HRC cannot win the nomination on popularly chosen delegates alone....the Superdelegates will be able to be schmoozed and bribed with future power by the candidates and we will all have to wait for the convention!....This is great!

I hope and pray for a Chicago 1968....the American people will once again see how the American left organizes and governs....what a mess!...and the calm, rational and respectful patriotic American, Senator John Sydney McCain will contrast well against the wacko demogogues.....

And the left is now talking about the lemonade from the lemons that is a protracted and damaging democrat primary fight: A Clinton/Obama ticket......This is the brave face that the ruling class has decided to give us all and I just have to laugh.....

John McCain is the real deal. His speech last night was a brilliant delineation of principles that even Rush Limbaugh could understand - maybe not Willie Cunningham.

The Mopes of MSNBC once again pulled down their own britches - especially the Geek-in-Chief Olbermann.

http://hickeysite.blogspot.com/2008/03/john-mccain-johnmccain-runs-table-wins.html

Cee,

John McCain does not spell his middle name like the daughter of a day trader.

Besides, I think John Milhous McCain has a nice ring to it... :D

I agree with you, Rev. Dr. Cee. Democracy should be avoided at all costs. The will of the people should be suppressed whenever it rears its ugly head. What we really need is a Ceeocracy, a pompous, puerile ruler as both the head of state and the head of the national cult. I can think of no one more qualified than you, and I am certain that the other members of the Gang of Five, or the Fünfbund, will be glad to carry your torches for you.

Just like F*O*X* switched from whoring to Guiliani to Romney to Huckabee to McCain, I assume?

Posted by: at March 5, 2008 9:23 AM

A very poor assumption...

I agree with you, Rev. Dr. Cee. Democracy should be avoided at all costs. The will of the people should be suppressed whenever it rears its ugly head. What we really need is a Ceeocracy, a pompous, puerile ruler as both the head of state and the head of the national cult. I can think of no one more qualified than you, and I am certain that the other members of the Gang of Five, or the Fünfbund, will be glad to carry your torches for you.
Posted by: at March 5, 2008 10:45 AM

In this case, my Ceesar, since there will be no Democratic Convention, I humbly request that you allow the Dem candidates, MSNBC staffers, Daily Kos and MoveOn.org denizens, to rumble before us in the coliseum.

(My money's on Slick Willy)...

Thanks, Cecelia.....The influence of my racist "white bread" enivronment even influences my spelling of common names....the anonymous poster will be pleased....

This is the latest from the progressive wing of the democrat party....

"Obama's campaign is also about cleaning out the Clinton-led Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) from party dominance. Hillary's scorched earth tactics reflect the DLC's Republican-Lite politics, which ultimately gave us the Iraq war. Hillary has unfairly tried to undermine Obama's candidacy and the grassroots movement he represents by characterizing his accomplishments as nothing more than 'a speech.' This echoes precisely what right-wing mouthpieces have been screeching about Obama all along and gives the Republicans ready-made commercials for the general election. It is potentially very damaging to the party.

"Clinton said that she and John McCain had the life experience to be chief executive but Obama just gave 'a speech.' This statement is just the kind of thing that the racists love to hear: Obama is just a 'boy' whose 20 years of public service doesn't stack up to a hill of beans. We should simply discount this man's life's work as humbug. That's a pretty harsh attack directed at a fellow Democrat. And why did Clinton leave it ambiguous in a recent interview whether or not she knew that Obama is a practicing Christian?

"The Republicans have driven the country into bankruptcy and war. Hillary Clinton has learned that by playing on people's instincts and emotions and fears she can squeak out victories. The question is: At what cost to the Democratic Party is Hillary willing to press her case and how long will it take the party to determine that Barack Obama is not only the victor in terms of delegates and votes, but that he is also the strongest candidate to take on John McCain in the general election."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/joseph-a-palermo/its-still-over-but-at-w_b_89941.html

###
No lemonade there.....I wonder if his supporters would accept him being HRC's "boy" (the writer's characterization, not mine!) as Vice President?

For such a tolerant party, the democrats sure are having a difficult time getting their primary voters to practice what they preach.....the divisions along racial lines ARE GETTING WORSE as this primary drags on and it is exposing the true soul of this pathetic group.....

This is not my great grandfather's democract party!....JFK would be weeping.....

And not weeping like the silly girls at Obamessiah's rallies, either!....

weep, faint, then weep again!

Generally, Jeff/Royal King/Olby S***s, I value only the opinion of objective sources, and I see no reason to change that policy for a simple Republican lapdog.

How I wish I were a second grade teacher. The children wouldlaugh-and-laugh at your spelling of "Caesar," Cecelia.

The Power Play!

WASHINGTON - Hillary Rodham Clinton, fresh off a campaign-saving comeback, hinted Wednesday at the possibility of sharing the Democratic presidential ticket with Barack Obama — with her at the top. Obama played down his losses, stressing that he still holds the lead in number of delegates.

weep, faint, then weep again!

Posted by: cee at March 5, 2008 10:55 AM

Can I pencil that in for sometime after the immense glee of seeing Eleanor Cliff's psychic turmoil over whether to be "afraid of strong womyn" or a "racist"... :D

How I wish I were a second grade teacher. The children would laugh-and-laugh at your spelling of "Caesar," Cecelia.

The children wouldlaugh-and-laugh at your spelling of "Caesar," Cecelia.

Posted by: at March 5, 2008 11:00 AM

Yep, definately philby. Yesterday the cooking reference, ribs and sauerkraut, today spelling......How did that big dose of hypocrisy go w/those ribs yesterday?

How I wish I were a second grade teacher. The children wouldlaugh-and-laugh at your spelling of "Caesar," Cecelia.
Posted by: at March 5, 2008 11:00 AM

While you're at it, Teflon-to-Irony-One, teach them word "parody", as in a play on names...

Oh boy, anon....John SIDNEY McCain was nominated through a wonderful, democratic process in the republican party primary system that saw moderates, independents and conservatives get behind him despite his near death experience this past summer....And you complain that I don't want democracy?.....

My parents here in NJ registerted Republican for the first time to vote for John SIDNEY....This was my second primary vote for the honorable POW...the last being his run against W in 2000 when I voted in Connecticut.....

I was so happy to participate in a fair and open election process and not have to wait for some snobbish ruling elite tell me who my party's nominee would be!

So please...the democrats are the ones with the silly power elite system to pick their nominees and the undemocratic process of powerful super-delegates and back room deals....You should abandon the litmus-testing, racist, irrational and Marxist party for the more modern and tolerant republicans!

Yep, definately philby. Yesterday the cooking reference, ribs and sauerkraut, today spelling......How did that big dose of hypocrisy go w/those ribs yesterday?

Posted by: olby sucks at March 5, 2008 11:04 AM

Well, he choked on the anchovies in Dr.Ceesar's salad...

The nitwits are playing the Name Game:

Philby, Pillby, Billby, Gillby, Sillby, Dillby, Willby, Cecelia ....

Cecelia, Dadelia, Gadelia, Madelia, Padelia, Royal King ....

Royal King, Boil Ping, Soil Ding, Foil Bing ....

Royal King, Boil Ping, Soil Ding, Foil Bing ....
Posted by: at March 5, 2008 11:26 AM

Clucker clucker bobucker banana fanna fauxflucker...

Cee,

There's a piece in the WSJ that you'd find interesting. It certainly explains why Clinton is making noises about casting Obama as her 2nd...

Here's an exert. You can read the rest at:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120468872575712799.
html?mod=opinion_main_review_and_outlooks

"The party superdelegates who were all for Mrs. Clinton when she was "inevitable" are now hoping she'll drop out and spare them a painful decision. A herd of them -- they prefer the camouflage of numbers -- have reportedly even been plotting to break together for the Illinois orator.
[Hillary Rodham Clinton]

But yesterday's message from actual Democratic voters was hardly a decisive verdict for Mr. Obama."

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120468872575712799.html?mod=opinion_
main_review_and_outlooks

I hope this link works.

Interesting take, Cecelia....It leaves me optimistic that the predictions by bold posters here at OW that the Obama campaign was a "freight train," or that the war and economy would automatically cause all people to abandon reason and judgement to vote for a 1st term Senator from Illinois with no executive or foreign policy experience were wrong.....

The drawn out primary season only gives McCain the chance to define both possible foes and also quietly mend fences on the right with the press captivated by the other side's horserace.

Hillary endorses McCain!

http://donklephant.com/2008/03/04/hillary-endorses-mccain/

"Freight train" was mikes description.

OK, I voted for Hindenberg[sic], but he was too old, and we ended up with Hitler anyway. You would have enjoyed that time! Then, I didn't get to vote again until I voted for Adenauer.

Posted by: philby at March 4, 2008 3:13 PM

I think it would be a safe bet to say you voted for (d)'s in every election. Which makes this baseless accusation:

"If you voted for GWB and you're going to vote for McCain, you ain't no conservative. You're just a Republican lap poodle."

Even more idiotic and hypocritical. It's just more icing on the cake O' hypocrisy. Enjoy it w/your kraut!

The link,

http://donklephant.com/2008/03/04/hillary-endorses-mccain/

had the two idiots, Olbermann and Maddow, complaining about Hillary's correct evaluation of the extent of Obamessiah's articulated foreign policy experience....his anti-war speech in 2002.....

And it will be interesting if the two twits comeback tonight and admit that Hillary's vetting of Obamessiah's lack of foreign policy experience when compared to McCain and her actually won her the 3 out of 4 primaries yesterday....

I doubt it.....

You missed the point again, wannawipe....It was Maddow and Olbermann who suggested, at the end of the clip, that Hillary basically endorced McCain...I only point out the silliness of the partisan Olbermann and Maddow who will now have to admit they were wrong about the whole issue and Hillary actually won yesterday in part of her finally showing Obama is a neophyte and not deserving to be President.....

The fact that Hillary won yesterday places the partisan hack Olbermann in the uncomfortable position of being one of the many leftists ready to throw Hillary under the bus (his overused term) who now has to continue to see the sparring.....to both candidates detriment and to the advantage of the safe republican nominee.....

I guarentee Olbermann will attempt the lemonade from lemons tact of the "unity ticket," tonight ignoring the fact that Obamessiah has been very much bloodied by HRC and has even more reason to not make nice with her now that it seems BOTH cannot win the nomination on primary results alone.....

Hello August!

dp gets very upset when you say anything negative or point out maddow's idiocy. He will defend his lesbian sock puppets tooth and nail.

Homophobia!

So, you're saying maddow is not a lesbian?

Which party has the racists?.....

Clinton campaign making Obama "blacker"

http://www.dailykos.com

###
More of this to come from Clinton Co....I am amazed.

A very interesting read.

What's troubling about Obama's approach to the mini-storm stirred by his political enemies over his name is what may look like an attempt at obfuscation. He has behaved as if he did have a family secret, and as if the name Hussein was something to be ashamed of - or, worse still, as if a Muslim background is somehow a handicap for an American politician in ways that Christian, Jewish, Mormon or any other faith is not.

That, of course, is hurtful to Muslims - a majority of whom reject the anti-American diatribes of the radical and violent minority.

http://www.nypost.com/seven/03052008/postopinion/opedcolumnists/obamas_real_mideast_problem_100546.htm

Thanks for link Cecelia. I really like this passage from the WSJ link:

"If he is the nominee, Mr. Obama will be stronger in the fall as a result of the greater scrutiny now.

Mrs. Clinton would bring her own weaknesses into the fall campaign, not least her implausibility as an agent of "change." We certainly understand the desire of many Democrats to be free at last from their codependency with both Clintons."

speaking of "Homophobia!", check this out:

http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2008/01/keith_olberman_and_chis_matthe.html

(excellent photoshop skills, this would make Lundesigns proud!)

Who's crooked?

(CNSNews.com) - On July 27, 2007, 28 executives of the Thousand Oaks, Calif., pharmaceutical firm Amgen contributed more than $20,000 to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's (D-Calif.) campaign.

On Aug. 2, Pelosi (D-Calif.) reintroduced the Early Treatment for HIV Act, a bill that could boost Medicaid coverage of HIV-related drugs, including Procrit, which is manufactured by Amgen and marketed by a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, a firm in which Pelosi's husband owns at least $250,000 in stock, according to Pelosi's disclosure forms.

http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=/Politics/archive/200803/POL20080305b.html

For those radical leftists who become apoplectic (Keith Olbermann especially)when they see his face or hear his voice....here you go.....

http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/politics/dem_candidates_make_the_morning_show_rounds_79083.asp

###
Even HRC can get along with Mr. Rove and joke around with him.....Oh boy....Will Olbermann comment on this encounter which even took place on FOX NEWS?!?.....

"On FNC, [...] (m)idway through Steve Doocy's questioning of Clinton, Rove slipped Doocy a piece of paper, which Doocy read. 'More U.S. presidents have been born in the month of October than any other month. You were born in...' he asked.

"'October, thank you Karl! I mean the omens are just stacking up, what can I say?' responded Clinton."

###
What a sweet exchange, egh leftists?

A special gift for all of you turnip truck riders, otherwise known as the Gang of Five or the Fünfbund, it's growing late here, and I'm pooped. You have free reign to make stupid, racist, homophobic statements, unchecked by the laws of good taste, decency or me. Enjoy!

cee, did you read this?

http://www.nypost.com/seven/03052008/postopinion/opedcolumnists/obamas_real_mideast_problem_100546.htm

G-night, philby/clucker/rudy/anon/joel/jennifer!

A special gift for all of you turnip truck riders, otherwise known as the Gang of Five or the Fünfbund, it's growing late here, and I'm pooped. You have free reign to make stupid, racist, homophobic statements, unchecked by the laws of good taste, decency or me. Enjoy!

Posted by: at March 5, 2008 3:32 PM

No, thanks, Anonyloon, but by all means, yes, go seek out someone else to do that for you!

(Wave bye, everyone...)

I came across this video which is parody at its finest. It is titled Obama Man Can! [using the music and lyrics from The Candy Man Can] and is @

http://www.youtube.com/watch
v=Rgt6YQiZTkc

I heard on a radio talk show, The Schnitt Show, and went to their web site to hear it again.

Enjoy!

Grammie

I came across this video which is parody at its finest. It is titled Obama Man Can! [using the music and lyrics from The Candy Man Can] and is @

http://www.youtube.com/watch
v=Rgt6YQiZTkc

I heard on a radio talk show, The Schnitt Show, and went to their web site to hear it again.

Enjoy!

Grammie

Good analysis, OS....I am in agreement 100% with Mr. Taheri....Obamessiah wants to basically end the strong alliance with Israel and is hinting at sitting down with Iran....This position is naieve, dangerous and immoral......

Look at this article linked at DRUDGE....

http://www.insight-report.com/2008/080304/obama.html

###
Basically, Obamessiah is blaming Bush for radical islamists in Iran and ignoring all of the terrorism committed by Al Queda, Iran, Syria, Iraq and The Taliban 1979 through 9/10/01!!!!!!

I am sick of this historical revisionism! Hundreds of thousdands of people have died at the hands of radical islamists prior to 9/11, including many Americans, and yet the silly democrats seek to ignore this!

And with WMD in the picture, the democrats refuse to see the danger in giving the radicals in Iran a signal of a possible break with Israel (nevermind a date certain that we will no longer be militarily engaged in Iraq!).....

Obamessiah is a sorry candidate when it comes to the serious business of radical islamic terrorism in the middle east.

This is where HRC has it right and finally got some traction in questioning his foreign policy abilities....look for her to continue it and bloody him some more as McCain prepares to face him in the general.

Facing CHILD PORN charges, far left radio host Bernie Ward breached court monitoring rules

MARCH 5--The San Francisco radio host facing child pornography charges lied to federal officials about his whereabouts after investigators recently received an alert that he had violated his "electronic monitoring schedule."

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2008/0305081ward1.html

This is where HRC has it right and finally got some traction in questioning his foreign policy abilities....look for her to continue it and bloody him some more as McCain prepares to face him in the general.

Posted by: cee at March 5, 2008 4:33 PM

This is just one reason I'm not of the "anyone but Hillary" crowd and I hope she goes after him tooth and nail on his "foreign policy abilities", his view of the world and our role in it.

This is just one reason I'm not of the "anyone but Hillary" crowd ....
Posted by: Cecelia at March 5, 2008 4:50 PM

^ that is why I thought your little link was amusing.

^ that is why I thought your little link was amusing.

Posted by: ANYONE BUT HILLARY at March 5, 2008 6:21 PM

I can tell...

It's going to fun beating the repubs this year:

McCain Trails Clinton, Obama in New Poll
GOP Candidate's Age a Factor for More Than a Quarter Surveyed

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/05/AR2008030502646.html

Posted by: new gal at March 5, 2008 6:43 PM

I got a bridge for sale. Want to buy it?

Ex-Sailor Convicted in Terrorism Case

By JOHN CHRISTOFFERSEN
Associated Press Writer

NEW HAVEN, Conn. (AP) -- A former Navy sailor was convicted Wednesday of leaking details about ship movements to suspected terrorism supporters, an act that could have endangered his own crew mates. Jurors convicted Hassan Abu-Jihaad, 32, of Phoenix of providing material support to terrorists and disclosing classified national defense information on the second day of deliberations.

If St.Hill pulls it off..think KO will break his neck when he dose a 180 to start kissing her butt again?

f St.Hill pulls it off..think KO will break his neck when he dose a 180 to start kissing her butt again?

Posted by: mlong at March 5, 2008 8:31 PM

She'll need him more than he needs her.

He's the Great Orange Oracle of the loony left in her party.

My husband and I have been fans who not only don't miss your show, we watch your re-runs through the week! Your comments as of late seem to be slanted against Senator Clinton. It's time to stop telling America how you find Senator Clinton unworthy of the Presidency. You hold sway sir, and need to respect your ability to influence votes. At the very least explain why you slant so and give us the opportunity to understand and perhaps change our views. We will not change our minds simply because you constantly lean away from our candidate. You are a negative ad against Sen Clinton.

I am gratified to see that the Gang of Five took my advice and continue to make stupid, racist, homophobic comments after I bid you adieu last evening. You never disappoint.

Oh boy....HRC's biggest supporter, Ann Coulter, has some great stuff about the adulterous sodomite.....

"You can stop lying for the voters now, Hillary. This is me, Ann Coulter, your supporter.

"This charade of a marriage has gone on long enough. Even if you were stupid enough to marry him back in the '70s, Bill is just so over, girlfriend. He can't even get Holiday Inn cocktail waitresses anymore. Last I heard, he was hitting on the Motel 6 housekeeping staff.

"You're too good for him, Hillary. Obama has now denounced and rejected Louis Farrakhan. It's time for you to denounce and reject Bill Clinton.

"Obama excites voters by offering to be the first black president. You've got a chance to make history by becoming the first divorcee to win the White House.

[...]

"If Hillary is serious about becoming president, she's got to make some changes. I say this as a Hillary supporter and strong opponent of divorce. Hillary: You've got to divorce Bill. You've already fired one campaign manager. Now it's time to get rid of your No. 1 buzz-killer.

"Not only is the media's group-lie about Bill Clinton being a 'rock star' over, but -- one can hope -- the use of the excruciatingly stupid phrase 'rock star' to refer to wonky politicians is over. It's become such a cliche that music critics have begun referring to actual rock stars as 'leading Democratic contenders.'"

###
weep, faint, then weep again.....right?

3:14

Is Harold Ford a homophobe? Still waiting . . .

I suppose you were for the presidency of Alan Keyes? He was right about the unconstitutionality of the income tax. Did you listen to him or were you a racist?

Ask Mike whether it is appropriate to vote platform. I believe I saw him state it is not good to stay loyal to a person but rather to ideology. So take him on. Platform is wrong.

Don't be nasty, Sharon. I responded to you. It was either delted because it did not agree with the prevailing philosophy of the Gang of Five, or it is simply lost in the mindless and endless Cee, Cecelia, Jeff/Royal King/Olby S***s crap.

No, I don't think Harold Ford is a homophobe.

As a member of the party was smeared him in such an appaling racist fashion, however, you ought not be using him as an example of goodness and worth. You should be extolling the virtues of the juggling clown who was the beneficiary of the RNC racist smear.

I am not from Tennessee, but the tactic I recall is using a commercial indicating Ford was a playboy not to be taken seriously because of the story that he visited the playboy mansion. If you are not going to vote for a party because of smear tactics, you may as well vote Nadar. Both R and D engage in ugly politics.

Just so that I understand your reasoning: Ford is not a homophobe because he is a democrat. Any R who holds the same position as Ford is a homophobe. Gotcha.

Ford is not a homophobe because he is a democrat. Any R who holds the same position as Ford is a homophobe. Gotcha.

Posted by: Sharon at March 6, 2008 9:41 AM

Finally, you are getting it. What took you so long? :)

Just so that I understand your reasoning: Ford is not a homophobe because he is a democrat. Any R who holds the same position as Ford is a homophobe. Gotcha.

*
If that is your understanding, you're as big a moron as Jeff/Royal King/Olby S***s. You people never can seem to crawl out of the gutter, can you? You seem oddly proud of that fact.

Dillhole alert!

Rep. Harold Ford, Jr. (D-TN):

"I do not support the decision today reached by the New Jersey Supreme Court regarding gay marriage. I oppose gay marriage, and have voted twice in Congress to amend the United States Constitution to prohibit same-sex marriage. This November there's a referendum on the Tennessee ballot to ban same-sex marriage - I am voting for it."

Dillhole alert is not you, Harold. It is 2:05.

Dillhole alert!

Posted by: Sharon at March 6, 2008 2:06 PM

Well, Sharon, you can comfort yourself in the knowledge that the DNC would never make an issue of say....Giuliani....or (insert name of ANY Republican) being photographed at a Playboy Party with half-naked Bunnies running around.

The feminist would find that a-okay... The political opposition wouldn't THINK of using the info...etc..etc...

However, there's noooooo doubt that, were it a black pol, the Tennesseans (who had managed to put their latent racism in check long enough to elect a black man in the first place...) would still be up at arms at the sight of this man in the arms of a platinum hued bottle-blonde...

You got to marvel at the mindset of a leftist chickenblogger. For any sort of traction, they'll not only throw out the bathwater and the baby, they'll level the whole damn bathroom... :D

Sorry Sharon, I simply lack the moral perfection of Jesus, the BVM and you. Indeed, I realize you are rightfully annoyed that I indicate that Jesus and the BVM share your perfection. For what it's worth, I am opposed to gay marriage. I am not certain how we should go about facilitating adults of the same sex making committments to one another. I can only say the relationship is not and should not be marriage. As for contractual rights, we should grant those irrespecive of marriage. I realize this will not satisfy your overblown sense of right and your flawless judgment. Nonetheless, there you have it.

*

Cecelia: I suspect virtually everyone is as sick of your putting your big ugly nose into everyone's business as I am.

Girls is that noise I hear fluck, fluck, fluuuck?

Grammie

Cecelia: I suspect virtually everyone is as sick of your putting your big ugly nose into everyone's business as I am.

Posted by: at March 6, 2008 3:15 PM

It's small and dainty, actually.

I'm glad you're sick of it.

Get used to it... :D

Good, now we have Grammie Janet joining your bellowing trio. Your already remarkable low composite IQ has fallen even further, and the air of racism and homophobia has become even more polluted.

Good, now we have Grammie Janet joining your bellowing trio. Your already remarkable low composite IQ has fallen even further, and the air of racism and homophobia has become even more polluted.

Posted by: at March 6, 2008 3:34 PM

It never fails... This idiot concocts a stew of rotteness, assiduously stirs and stirs it, THEN points the finger and howls that it stinks... :D

Girls is that noise I hear fluck, fluck, fluuuck?

Grammie

Posted by: Janet Hawkins at March 6, 2008 3:17 PM

Indeed, it is. She's denying it, but, it's very obvious. Doesn't take a Private I to figure that one out!

I did, I did hear a fluck, fluck, fluuuck!

Grammie

(re: Cecelia's nose)

It's small and dainty, actually.
Posted by: Cecelia at March 6, 2008 3:26 PM

Blog Translator: It's bulbous, pitted and red from years of whiskey drinking.

^ that is why I thought your little link was amusing.
Posted by: ANYONE BUT HILLARY at March 5, 2008 6:21 PM

I can tell...
Posted by: Cecelia at March 5, 2008 6:43 PM

Wow, she can read! Please spare me your new found "love & respect" for Hillary. It's great to see Rush Limbaugh work his "magic" powers on you.

Wow, she can read! Please spare me your new found "love & respect" for Hillary. It's great to see Rush Limbaugh work his "magic" powers on you.

Posted by: Anyone but Hillary at March 6, 2008 5:17 PM

Well, obviously, to you, a pragmatic area other than "Anyone but Hillary" is strange ground indeed...

Blog Translator: It's bulbous, pitted and red from years of whiskey drinking.

Posted by: Blog Translator at March 6, 2008 5:12 PM

Blog Translator: Chicken blogger is out of arguments... :D

Posted by: Anyone but Hillary at March 6, 2008 5:17 PM

May I suggest you change your name to "anyone with a (d)?" Seems more fitting.

Blog Translator: It's bulbous, pitted and red from years of whiskey drinking.

Posted by: Blog Translator at March 6, 2008 5:12 PM

I'll go with that if we can assume you weigh 425 lbs. haven't showered in over a month and are ordering 2 large pizzas as we speak. Agreed? That's fair, right?

^ what! you looking in the mirror again, royal.

Well, obviously, to you, a pragmatic area other than "Anyone but Hillary" is strange ground indeed...
Posted by: Cecelia at March 6, 2008 5:42 PM

If just once you could make sense when forever trying to have the "last" word. Yes, out of what's left, either Obama or McCain will do.

Blog Translator: Chicken blogger is out of arguments... :D
Posted by: Cecelia at March 6, 2008 5:45 PM

I don't have arguments, I merely translate blog comments. Que Kraftwerk music. (Just in case, (as you have shown here), you have limited pop culture knowledge, here is a link: http://www.kraftwerk.com/)

__________________

I'll go with that if we can assume you weigh 425 lbs. haven't showered in over a month and are ordering 2 large pizzas as we speak. Agreed? That's fair, right?
Posted by: olby SUCKS at March 6, 2008 5:51 PM

We are not human, we are DEVO! (royal, I KNOW you are cultural ignoramus, here's your link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devo)

Que Kraftwerk music

Translation: drug taking music.

Well, obviously, to you, a pragmatic area other than "Anyone but Hillary" is strange ground indeed...
Posted by: Cecelia at March 6, 2008 5:42 PM

If just once you could make sense when forever trying to have the "last" word. Yes, out of what's left, either Obama or McCain will do.

Posted by: Anyone but Hillary at March 6, 2008 6:38 PM

Too bad someone hasn't developed a Logic Translator for you, although the bandwidth-to-pop-culture-value THAT would require would be lopsided indeed...

The name "Anyone but Hillary" implies something that is the opposite of pragmatism. It implies an emotional rejection.

Obama and McCain are not interchangeable. Their positions are QUITE different, in a way that Hillary's and McCain are not. So it's not political philosophy that causes you to be against Hillary otherwise you'd reject someone who is farther to the left or who is farther to the right, as Obama and McCain are respectively. It must be character. And to suggest that her character is such that you'd rather have either of two opposite poles is an emotional rather than pragmatic position.

That IS exactly the way Rush Limbaugh feels about her. Evidently you've found a port in storm there... :D

"anyone but hillary" hates women, period.

Anti-American leftists seemed to be likely involved with the bombing of the recruiting office in NYC, Times Square (consistent with their treatment of our armed forces and those recruiting for them since the 1960's).....how quaint!....

Terrorism in America....seemingly done by the 20%ers who hate the victory in Iraq for freedom and democracy.....

"The manila envelopes contained a photo of a man standing in front of the recruiting station before it was bombed. The photo was the kind commonly sent as a holiday greeting card, according to a Democratic aide who spoke on condition of anonymity because the matter is under investigation.

"The message on the card: 'Happy New Year, We Did It.'

"The envelope also contained a packet of approximately 10 sheets of paper that seemed to be a political manifesto railing against the Iraq war"

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080307/ap_on_go_co/times_square_blast_letters

###
Yep....as the Iraq war continues to be won by America, the terrorists and the anti-American left will ratchet it up.....I was hoping only rhetorically....but it seems some want to make a stronger point with terrorist attacks....

Oh well....we will continue to see the radicalism of Obamessiah, HRC and the rest of the left in this primary season as they pummel eachother for the nomination and the anti-America left extract their devotion....and the sensible, quiet and compassionate former POW will make his honorable case for freedom and light in the world....an America on the side of good...not on the side of fear, recruitment station bombs and anger.....

Ah yes...Mike's honorable cohorts treating our brave men and women so well!.....

"Special report: Tracing the Left’s escalating war on military recruiters"

http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/07/special-report-tracing-the-lefts-escalating-war-on-military-recruiters/

Oh yeah, this sounds like something Branch Davidians would pull off, anonymoys poster....Especially in New York City.....And I like your white wash of the letters to congress by a leftist nutcase along with the Berkeley incidents and the left's war against the military on campuses all over America.....

Those bogeymen on the right are convienient dodges used by the anti-America left as they continue their quest to destroy from within!

Weep, faint, then weep again!

"As the trench warfare stretches on through the spring, the excitement of Obama-mania will seem like a distant, childish mirage. People will wonder if Obama ever believed any of that stuff himself. And even if he goes on to win the nomination, he won’t represent anything new. He’ll just be a one-term senator running for president.

"In short, a candidate should never betray the core theory of his campaign, or head down a road that leads to that betrayal. Barack Obama doesn’t have an impressive record of experience or a unique policy profile. New politics is all he’s got. He loses that, and he loses everything. Every day that he looks conventional is a bad day for him.

"Besides, the real softness of the campaign is not that Obama is a wimp. It’s that he has never explained how this new politics would actually produce bread-and-butter benefits to people in places like Youngstown and Altoona.

"If he can’t explain that, he’s going to lose at some point anyway."

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/07/opinion/07brooks.html?_r=1&ref=opinion&oref=slogin

###
So true....Obamessiah is starting to be the typical dirty tricks politicians the democrats really enjoy....like HRC.....The weep, faint then weep again stuff is going to become less frequent....

Then what does he have to offer?

...so, when faced yet again with the clientage of his fetsh/president to the Saudi royal family (on the March 5 thread this morning), Phari-cee runs to another thread on the same website. Why can't you even attempt to make some sence of your scattered philosophy, Phari-cee?

Your intellectual incapacity is matched only by your physical cowardice, chickenhawk. You even flee from explaining the stark contradictions between your lustful support of the Iraq war to defend Israel and spew freedom, and your fetish/president's thralldm to the Islamic autocrats of the Arabian Peninsula.

Thank you, Sir Loin. You do know Cee.

See the other thread, Sir Loin of Milquetoast....the fact that you cannot defeat my argument regarding the moral rationale in removing Saddam Hussein does not mean I have to get into a protracted argument regarding policy unrelated to Hussein....your red herring.

The world is safer without the power of Hussein and that is a fact.

The world is safer without the power of Hussein and that is a fact.

*

And it has only taken thousands of American lives, thousands of American injuries, billions upon billions of dolars, all still growing, a huge national debt, a looming national recession, perhaps even stagflation and thousands of hours by Rev. Dr. Cee setting behind his keyboard arguing for more deaths, more injuries, more money and defending Bush. Please don't ever think your immense sacrafice is not appreciated, Cee.

The world is safer without the power of Hussein and that is a fact.

Posted by: cee at March 7, 2008 11:43 AM

A wholly implicit and unsupported statement, Phari-cee. How much were you claiming that Hussein reportedly gave to the families of suicide bombers? $32 million?

Hundreds of millions of dollars are documented as coming from the Saudis to groups like Hammas and Al Qeada, and oil is the undeniable source of these funds. Now with Iraqi oil off the market, the Saudis are reaping more than double the money on each barrell of oil, so where is this money going to go?

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Funding_terrorism

"Funding terrorism is the cover story for the December 15, 2003, online issue of U.S. News: "The Saudi Connection. How billions in oil money spawned a global terror network" by David E. Kaplan.

Late in 1998, Kaplan writes, the CIA's Illicit Transactions Group (ITC), "one of those tidy little Washington secrets, a group of unsung heroes whose job is to keep track of smugglers, terrorists, and money launderers," was called upon by the National Security Council "to help them answer a couple of questions: How much money did Osama bin Laden have, and how did he move it around?" Because Osama bin Laden's "al Qaeda terrorists had just destroyed two of America's embassies in East Africa," there was an urgency for the NSC "to find a way to break the organization's back." The NSC formed a task force with ITC "to look at al Qaeda's finances. ... The team soon realized that its most basic assumptions about the source of bin Laden's money--his personal fortune and businesses in Sudan--were wrong. Dead wrong. Al Qaeda, says William Wechsler, the task force director, was 'a constant fundraising machine.' And where did it raise most of those funds? The evidence was indisputable: Saudi Arabia."

The results of months of investigation revealed that "Over the past 25 years, the desert kingdom has been the single greatest force in spreading Islamic fundamentalism, while its huge, unregulated charities funneled hundreds of millions of dollars to jihad groups and al Qaeda cells around the world." What was the source of the funding? Oil."

...are the 5 million Iraqi refugees "safer" than they were prior to the invasion? Are the hundreds of thousands of Iraqi Christian who have been killed and displaced since Saddam's downfall "safer"?
Are the 160,000 US troops "safer" than they would be at home?, where they could swell the ranks of the National Guard to help keep their fellow Americans "safer" from a wide array of dangers.
http://www.christiansofiraq.com/sept20.html

That IS exactly the way Rush Limbaugh feels about her. Evidently you've found a port in storm there... :D
Posted by: Cecelia at March 6, 2008 8:59 PM

Who better to know Rush than a neocon zombie like yourself.

If you think McCain is "farther to the right", well I got some swampland in Arizona to sell ya. Except for the war and healthcare, they are pretty close, (I heard that on Laura Ingraham). Trust me, come election, McCain will move closer to Obama's healthcare plan. I do love watching the neocons flip flop back to McCain, it's almost as fun as Hillary supporters' (and neocons like yourself) argument that you're sexists if you're not for Billary. Ya right. Although watching her tear apart the Democratic Party has got to be fun for you AND Rush. Christ, I thought you idiots where the party of "Character", so are you all sexists too?

"anyone but hillary" hates women, period.
Posted by: at March 6, 2008 9:09 PM

god you are dumb. see above comment. Next time stand up and have a name, coward.

Muddying the Waters: Why No Olbermann for Tancredo? Or Maher for Keyes?

"Right this minute, Ann Coulter is lobbying for Hillary Clinton on MSNBC, saying that as opposed to John McCain, the Democratic candidate doesn't make a big deal of shutting down Guantanimo. The obvious rebuttal is that Clinton was never a prisoner of war, and the next thing you know, McCain has a second of your head space courtesy of the woman who wrote How to Talk to a Liberal if You Must.

Coulter, Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck and Joe Scarborough, all rabid supporters of impeaching Bill Clinton when he was president, are secure in promoting his wife over their own candidate because no matter what happens..."

Back when it could have made a difference, picture progressive pundits influencing the opposition in the same way Limbaugh did when he directed conservative Texans to vote for Clinton. Keith Olbermann looking into his Countdown camera for a surreal Special Comment:

"If Barack Obama is our party's candidate, I am voting for Tom Tancredo. Because you, Sir, are more aligned with my values in every way."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/karen-daltonbeninato/muddying-the-waters-why-_b_90290.html

stop the hate

so are you all sexists too?

Posted by: Anyone but Hillary at March 7, 2008 12:36 PM

"anyone but hillary" hates women, period.
Posted by: at March 6, 2008 9:09 PM

god you are dumb. see above comment. Next time stand up and have a name, coward.

Posted by: Anyone but Hillary at March 7, 2008 12:38 PM

f you think McCain is "farther to the right", well I got some swampland in Arizona to sell ya. Except for the war and healthcare, they are pretty close, (I heard that on Laura Ingraham). Trust me, come election, McCain will move closer to Obama's healthcare plan. I do love watching the neocons flip flop back to McCain, it's almost as fun as Hillary supporters' (and neocons like yourself) argument that you're sexists if you're not for Billary. Ya right. Although watching her tear apart the Democratic Party has got to be fun for you AND Rush. Christ, I thought you idiots where the party of "Character", so are you all sexists too?

Posted by: Anyone but Hillary at March 7, 2008 12:36 PM

This makes as much sense as you ever do. McCain is not as conservative as Huckabee so that means he's closer to being a progressive like Obama than Hillary? McCain is the candidate who is closer to Obama's more extension vision of govt supported health care than Hillary is because her plan is calculatedly less radical? Oh, THAT'S brilliant... :D

You stick out your hand, supposedly filled with the gems of Obama and McCain similarities, and all you can come up with is that McCain MIGHT slide towards Obama's thinking on heath care while HRC is farther along that route NOW. In the midst of issues such as the war, NAFTA,....hell...NOW even immigration and torture (Hillary has slipped in the past and said that waterboarding was a tool that should be on the table) THAT'S the best you can do?

Well, thanks for making clear your emotional animus with Hillary is that she won't step out of Obama's way. It's very unreasonable of her to fully see that she has a chance to pull it out the nomination and to keep going for it, I know... You hate her so much for the fact that she might beat Obama that you'd rather see a candidate who doesn't even hold your or his positions, triumph over a Democratic candidate who shares much much more of them. Well, spare me your insults for not being as emotional and irrational as you.

You're right, you're not like Rush Limbaugh. Besides the fact that HE is NOT dumb as a brick... his going for McCain---a Republican...closer to his beliefs...can be called the sort of pragmatism you've claimed, but then contradictorily characterized as a "flipflop"...

It's a shame that Limbaugh isn't the Repubican nominee for the presidency, only because it would be so much fun to see you champion HIM....Anyone But Hillary... :D

You hate her so much for the fact that she might beat Obama

posted by Cecelia

Exactly. I think the poster is ashamed to admit she is actually backing obama 100%. Just an observation.

Coulter, Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck and Joe Scarborough, all rabid supporters of impeaching Bill Clinton when he was president, are secure in promoting his wife over their own candidate because no matter what happens..."

Back when it could have made a difference, picture progressive pundits influencing the opposition in the same way Limbaugh did when he directed conservative Texans to vote for Clinton. Keith Olbermann looking into his Countdown camera for a surreal Special Comment:

"If Barack Obama is our party's candidate, I am voting for Tom Tancredo. Because you, Sir, are more aligned with my values in every way."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/karen-daltonbeninato/muddying-the-waters-why-_b_90290.html
Posted by: Anyone but Hillary at March 7, 2008 12:59 PM

Actually, Limbaugh told Republicans to vote for Hillary in open Democratic primaries because he thinks she'll be easier to beat that John McCain in the election.

Paid pundits Scarborough and Beck who voice their opinions on all candidates, think Hillary is the best Dem candidate and of the two, and is the one more likely tto uphold conversative positions on the war, free markets, etc. Contrast THAT with your championing the candidate who holds fewer positions than the candidate of your choice or your political party...

You are in line with Coulter, whose overwrought personal animus towards McCain, is similar to the one you have for Clinton, in that she'd cut off her nose to spite her face.

(In your case that surgery would likely be an improvement.)

It's a shame that Limbaugh isn't the Repubican nominee for the presidency, only because it would be so much fun to see you champion HIM....Anyone But Hillary... :D
Posted by: Cecelia at March 7, 2008 2:34 PM

Why are you so stupid? Of course I would not vote for Limbaugh anymore than you would vote for Olbermann. Please stop being so stupid with the strawmen, I know it's your speciality, but it's really lame, like you. And she doesn't have a chance in hell, because she can never catch up the delegates, dipshit. She's now setting herself up for 2012. We all know McCain will beat Obama, too many racists like you (as has been pointed out by many here), around to let that happen.

Paid pundits Scarborough and Beck who voice their opinions on all candidates, think Hillary is the best Dem candidate and of the two, and is the one more likely tto uphold conversative positions on the war, free markets, etc. Contrast THAT with your championing the candidate who holds fewer positions than the candidate of your choice or your political party...
Posted by: Cecelia at March 7, 2008 2:52 PM

god, why are you so stupid? Scabass and Peck are rooting for Hillary because they stupidly think she can be beatin by McCain. McCain will Lose to Hillary, and all you stupid neocon pukes just don't seem to get it.

You hate her so much for the fact that she might beat Obama
posted by Cecelia

Exactly. I think the poster is ashamed to admit she is actually backing obama 100%. Just an observation. Posted by: olby SUCKS at March 7, 2008 2:48 PM

God are you too so easily influenced by your neocon masters. McCain will easily beat Obama, this country is too dam racist! He has NO military or foreign experience. McCain will CRUSH him. If you think McCain can beat Hillary, you both are high. Bill & Hill will crush McCain like a bug. They'll swiftboat his ass so you'll believe he was at Hong Kong country club instead of the Vietnam prison.

BTW, royal, I was pulling for Huckster.

Exactly. I think the poster is ashamed to admit she is actually backing obama 100%. Just an observation.

Posted by: olby SUCKS at March 7, 2008 2:48 PM

Ya, think... She's even slamming me-- someone who will NOT vote for either Hillary or Obama-- for preferring Hillary over Obama, if McCain loses to a Democrat. Imagine how's she's treating the members of her own party who back HRC.

When talking about someone ripping apart the Democratic Party, she needs to look in a mirror. (Not that I'd lose any sleep over THAT... :D Have at it, sister...)

Actually, Limbaugh told Republicans to vote for Hillary in open Democratic primaries because he thinks she'll be easier to beat that John McCain in the election.
Posted by: Cecelia at March 7, 2008 2:52 PM

Well, this time Limpdick is wrong.

Have at it, sister...)
Posted by: Cecelia at March 7, 2008 3:07 PM

I ain't your "sister" you fucking neocon cunt, lets get that straight right now. I ain't an Obama supporter because he doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell. I could give a flying fuck if you like Hillary over Obama.

When talking about someone ripping apart the Democratic Party
Posted by: Cecelia at March 7, 2008 3:07 PM

And it's neocons like you and royal that have ruined the Republican Party.

God are you too so easily influenced by your neocon masters. McCain will easily beat Obama, this country is too dam racist! He has NO military or foreign experience. McCain will CRUSH him. If you think McCain can beat Hillary, you both are high. Bill & Hill will crush McCain like a bug. They'll swiftboat his ass so you'll believe he was at Hong Kong country club instead of the Vietnam prison.

BTW, royal, I was pulling for Huckster.
Posted by: Anyone But Hillary at March 7, 2008 3:05 PM

So much for "Obama's health care plan"...

Sheesh....suddenly "wasted keystrokes" sounds like a great moniker...

Obama's healthcare plan has a better chance of passing than Hillary's. Christ, even Michael Moore thinks Hillary's plan is simply a healthcare industry wetdream. IF, healthcare is an issue, THEN, McCain will have to move closer. BUT, my guess, NATIONAL SECURITY will be the issue, and McCain will eat Obama for breakfeast. As for the economy, it's a wash for both McCain & Obama, that is why the security issue will be pushed. Hillary would have a waaaaay better chance against McCain, and you neocons are duped by Rush's of the world and can't see that. Only a few realize this, smart ones like Laura Ingraham and Bill O'Reilly.

BTW, you're right, there IS no point arguing with you, you'll vote straight repub ticket either way.

BTW, you're right, there IS no point arguing with you, you'll vote straight repub ticket either way.

Posted by: at March 7, 2008 3:48 PM

I know I've asked you before, but, I'll ask again. You dodged it like a silver bullet. How many times have you crossed party lines and who was it?

And it's neocons like you and royal that have ruined the Republican Party.

Posted by: at March 7, 2008 3:15 PM

I can't speak for Cecelia, but, I think you are giving me too much credit. I'm just a 'moron' and 'stupid,' remember? Wouldn't it require some intelligence to "ruin" a party?

Phari-cee is a shallow ideologue who cannot support his own positions. How many tmes has he run from my questions re: the Saudis just today? He cannot bring himself to address the issue.

I know I've asked you before, but, I'll ask again. You dodged it like a silver bullet. How many times have you crossed party lines and who was it?
Posted by: olby SUCKS at March 7, 2008 4:13 PM

Reagan, Reagan, Clinton, Clinton, Bush, Bush.----next, McCain.
happy now, numbnuts.

I can't speak for Cecelia, but, I think you are giving me too much credit. I'm just a 'moron' and 'stupid,' remember? Wouldn't it require some intelligence to "ruin" a party?
Posted by: olby SUCKS at March 7, 2008 4:21 PM

not really, idiot neocons like you can ruin a party pretty well, actually.

Reagan, Reagan, Clinton, Clinton, Bush, Bush.----next, McCain.
happy now, numbnuts.

Posted by: at March 7, 2008 5:10 PM

You're joking, right?

J$, please, for the love of god, close this comment section down! :D

This thread is now closed!