OlbermannWatch.com "My Faves" Set
OlbermannWatch.com Favorited Photos from other Flickr Users
Got OlbyPhotos? See some on Flickr? DO NOT email us. Send us a FlickrMail instead. Include a link to the photo. If we like the photo you will see it displayed in the Olby Flickr Flood above.
New to Flickr? Sign up for a FREE Flickr account!
New to YouTube? Sign up for a FREE YouTube account!
Links to OlbermannWatch.com
Blog posts tagged with "Olbermann"|
|
| Subscribe to Olbermann Watch Mailing List |
| Visit this group |
This is tonight's open thread for tonight's Hour of Spin. We need you to document the outrageous lies and vertiginous spin of the infamous, deplorable Keith Olbermann. Watch Oralmann if you dare, and do your recapping right here. Comments are open!
Did Olbermann gloat about his blue dress interview on the Spew?
#2: The Media Matters Minute. Three O'Reilly Attacks for three different things! Now, *that's* what I call an Olbsession.
#1: Olby takes the cause of his Madcow protege with a Special Education Komment on Proposition 8 (no gay marriage) in California. 70% of African-Americans voted Yes on that. But don't expect Rev. Olbermahn to play the race card here as he did all campaign long (and Friday night with Michele Bachmann). Can you say Olbypocrisy?
Worse in context: http://tinyurl.com/3m9xop
Worse blue blog source: Oralmann's own blog! http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/11/10/75739/592
Not posted until today! And when did Rip 'n Read bring this up? Today! When is this T-Points from? Last Wednesday!
Worser in context: http://billoreilly.com/store
For all purchases $19.95 or higher, you get a free "We Say Merry Christmas" bumper sticker. Proceeds for all BillOReilly.com purchases go to charities. See, Bathman? It pays to be generous.
But Worser blue blog source: HuffPo. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/11/06/oreillys-war-on-christmas_n_141896.html
Worst in context: http://tinyurl.com/3p6m9z
Helen Jones-Kelley was relieved of her position today. Follow-up story in the "Is It Legal" segment tomorrow.
Worst blue blog source: Media Matters. http://mediamatters.org/items/200811100010
Not posted until today! When did Rip 'n Read bring this up? Today! When did this air? Thursday! Rip 'n Read lifted Brock's quote VERBATIM.
So Olbermann actually begins his promo for his special comment on Prop 8 with :Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. No hypocrisy there, Olber-geek.
Who does Olbermann think he's kidding with tonights Speshul Komment? The sappy, teary-eyed, voice quivering plea to accept the concept of gay marriage made me cringe. And I'm not against the idea.
This is coming from a guy who debases women regularly. He has, at the very least, an abnormal personal relationship with a woman young enough to his daughter. Perhaps next week he'll be imploring the nation to accept his weird lifestyle.
To avoid confusion:
Yes on Prop 8 = against gay marriage
No on Prop 8 = for gay marriage
For more on the vote, watch tonight's Culture Warriors segment on "The Factor":
http://tinyurl.com/4qbzow
(Also, the Heidi Klum Guitar Hero ad.)
Oh boy, the church of SNOBamessiah's main media whore is stepping into a very hard area for his cult!
Taking on the democratically derived decision in Prop 8 means being HONEST about the outcome of both it and the election of The One. This is a most difficult place to be!
52% of the population voted for the leader....that's a landslide, a mandate for change that should not be questioned according to the cult.
52% of the population voted for Prop 8....the same number, including very large numbers of those supporting Obama, making it known that their view is that marriage is, as it always has been, a sacred union between two people of opposite genders. Is this not a landslide, a mandate especially in "progressive" California where even the governor is against keeping the definition of marriage specific?
Mmm, what to do about integrity? Any church of SNOBamessiah zealots out there, say MikeH, want to help fellow dippy disciple Olbermann here on this one?
Oh, and if Olbermann, or SNOBamessiah for that matter, is going to use another religion's sacred text for argument (Do unto others as you would have them do unto you) he should try to use it correctly and not simply apply a passage incorrectly to try to win a dishonest argument.
The age of the church of SNOBamessiah.....what a time to be alive!
VERO POSSUMUS!
With reality Keith's out of touch
An elitist that doesn't know much
Isn't marriage outdated
And widely hated
By moonbat liberals and such?
I had to watch it Dan after your comment. And yes it was sappy beyond belief. I thought we might finally be watching the final Olber-geek meltdown. Then I realized it is all an act.....when do we see him in Hollywood. I am certain someone out there was watching this thinking, this boy can really act.
I found it incredible (I know, he should not continue to amaze me but he does) that a vote that was largely determined by 70% of one group voting against it was used as an example why it should pass. And yet that group was never taken to task for wanting something for themselves that they refuse to give to this other group.
So, let me get this straight: Billo the Clown doesn't matter anymore, but he gets all three spots on the WPitW segment? Keith reminds me of Captain Ahab or Khan more and more everyday.
"I'm not personally vested in this, so don't think it's a ratings ploy. I have no family members who are gay, so don't think I'm gay - 'cause I'm not - while I cry and quiver my voice and chin for six minutes asking for people to love. Just love. Why can't we love?"
Fraud.
Cringe-worthy.
Is it that what he said, Lucas? Oy.
By LucasCop on November 11, 2008 1:48 PM
"I'm not personally vested in this, so don't think it's a ratings ploy. I have no family members who are gay, so don't think I'm gay - 'cause I'm not - while I cry and quiver my voice and chin for six minutes asking for people to love. Just love. Why can't we love?"
.......................................................
'And do you mind, riffraff, if I spend some time floating new shtick, such as my playing the Great Trump Tower Champion of Social Justice?
If I do decide to do something completely out of character and even halfway live up to my word on holding the Obama Administration's feet to the fire, I'm bound to alienate a lot of you. I need SOMETHING to keep currying favor with you smucks.'
I watched the SEK and could not stop staring at what looked like snot chilling out under his nose. I thought it might be a tear at first but tears don't take right turns and set up camp for 10 minutes on the upper lip.
Could the Laughing Stagehand not have made a quick "wipe your nose!" gesture before they came back from commercial break?
I just wish I knew what makes Keith so appealing to the 2 million people that watch him every night in total, and near 1 million in the 25-54 demo. What is so great about his show? What is so great about him? Never mind the far-left and his Kos kompadres; we know why *they* watch. But what about the rest of his audience? Is it the train wreck aspect? What?
They agree with his political and cultural stances and wish to hear them elucidated without the pesky interference of an opposing point of view.
I don't know. That still sounds like the far-left portion of his audience. I meant the rest of the audience. Are there actually clear-headed people in his audience that just want to watch the train wreck? And how can a clear-headed person like his smears and subsequent ad hominem attacks, and his "reportage" based on lies posted on blue blogs?
Well you know what this is, and it's soooooooooooo obvious.
He's no longer got his Bush to pound on ( hehe ). Now he's fighting conservative ideals. He's going after the core values of middle America. Which isn't just a republican thing.
I heard democrats go to church too.
But I guess they got better churches or something?
Let's see, he attacks O'Reilly for exercising his right of free speech as a way to raise money to donate to charity to help children at Christmas.
What do you have against free speech and/or children, Mr. Olbermann?
Looks like the gay community just ran headlong into one of the basic problems with democracy.
If they really felt that the matter shouldn't have been decided by a vote, then they shouldn't have voted on it. That might give them some credibility going to court.
What Keith conveniently overlooks is that they tried playing the game. And they lost.
Put another way, if the will of the people is to be ignored as far as Prop 8 is concerned, then how is the victory of Obama any more credible?