lol great clip, plus was anyone surprised KO bailed his "news broadcast" and was at the game tonight?

All the moonbats at NBC
View Obama favorably
No skeptics to be had
Journalism gone bad
Talking points straight from Valerie

Really, George? No shit...

http://www.businessinsider.com/guys-like-keith-olbermann-are-killing-all-chances-of-reform-2009-10

Keith is also killing the public option. I only very rarely send emails to my representatives or the president on issues. Even more rarely I make phone calls. All because of Keith and his rabidness over the public option I have made dozens of phone calls, sent dozens of emails, written several letters, attended local tea party rallies, and have spoken to family, friends, and neighbors about why there must not be a public option. I have only pushed the accelerator to the floor board because of Keith. I will not give up until the public option is defeated.

Thank you, Keith, for inspiring me to take action.

--

This is 21st day since the current president received the Nobel peace prize.

One performance artist slamming another. Becks entire TV hour is a Special Comment. His sermon is the same day in and day out. Today, he told O'Reilly that he has no answers for the questions he asks. Tune in tomorrow for some more of the same. Yawn.

besellers...
...Thanks for the link. The author has it pegged perfectly!
http://www.businessinsider.com/guys-like-keith-olbermann-are-killing-all-chances-of-reform-2009-10

Another. "What if George Bush had done it," moment in regards to President Obama's well covered visit to Dover, DE this week.....

"Originally, the New York Times reported on President Barack Obama's visit to Dover AFB and the arrival of fallen serviceman by explaining that the White House wanted Obama to be seen as concerned and aware of the sacrifices made in America’s war policies:

"A small contingent of reporters and photographers accompanied Mr. Obama to Dover, where he arrived at 12:34 a.m. aboard Marine One. He returned to the South Lawn of the White House at 4:45 a.m.

"The images and the sentiment of the president's five-hour trip to Delaware were intended by the White House to convey to the nation that Mr. Obama was not making his Afghanistan decision lightly or in haste.

"Following that link now, the second paragraph quoted is nowhere to be seen. The Jeff Zeleny report contains no editorial announcement of changes after its publication, and no indication of any retraction. Greyhawk at Mudville Gazette and Nice Deb both noticed the change, however, and Greyhawk also noticed that the NYT didn't quite redact that paragraph from everywhere on its servers. The story now reads like this:

"The trip was a symbolic one for Mr. Obama, given the gravity of his coming announcement of a new strategy for Afghanistan.

"The image of the commander in chief standing on a darkened tarmac, offering a salute to one of the soldiers, highlighted the poignancy of a decision he is facing.

"So who changed the story, and why? The original Zeleny report with that paragraph gave credence to the accusation that Obama made the Dover trip for a photo op. picked up by bloggers to criticize the White House. Its mysterious disappearance post-publication indicates that someone was unhappy with that kind of criticism and removed the paragraph to curtail it — and didn’t do a very good job of it, either.

"The editors of the NYT could have removed it on their own without prompting from anyone, but that doesn't make a lot of sense. The editors approved the piece for publication in the first place, and besides, the NYT isn't exactly adept at quickly responding to blogospheric criticism, at least not on its news pages (their blogs are a different matter). It would appear that someone other than bloggers brought this to the attention of the Times and pressed for the removal of the offending paragraph. That might also explain why the Times changed the article without acknowledging it, a big red flag in itself.

"The NYT should answer for why this change was made, and why they attempted to fly it under the radar. If the paragraph was inaccurate, a retraction should have accompanied it. If it wasn't inaccurate, then who pressed them to remove it?"

http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/30/did-white-house-pressure-nyt-into-changing-dover-story/

###
I was struck at the lack of "process" or "political angle" coverage of this story so far and once again see a pro-Obama slant in it all. The above is suggestive that there was a sensitivity of someone (either at the TIMES or from the administration) that the publicity of the visit must not be scrutinized. I am 100% sure that if Bush had done this, the press would have gladly covered the "photo-op" feel of it all and place it in context with what political pressers were present.

But again, Olbermann and the rest of the Obama lap dog media are willing to leave behind journalistic integrity for ideological reasons.

VERO POSSUMUS, indeed. Wee weed?

I love it that Glenn has been going after Keithy of late. I guess you can take only so much from the Shakespearean Commentator Keithy. I love it that so many people are mocking him.

Here is a great pic for Halloween on your front page:

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2532/4010748895_8088ee7024_o.jpg

Here is a printable mask, but not that scary of Keithy:
http://www.forbes.com/static_html/halloween/2008/keitholbermann.html

Check this:

http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/msnbc/bill_george_apologizes_for_olbermann_article_141787.asp

Shame on Bill George.