Buy Text-Link-Ads here
Recent Comments

    follow OlbyWatch on Twitter

    In

    John Gibson Welcomes Back the Infamous, Deplorable Keith Olbermann

    Philly wrote: Couldn't have happened to a nicer guy. It's not shingles that makes you a ... [more](10)

    In

    Welcome Back, Olby!

    syvyn11 wrote: <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/keith-olbermann-reviving-worst... [more](9)

    In

    Former Obama Support/Donor Releases Song Supporting Romney/Ryan: "We'll Take It Back Again" by Kyle Tucker

    syvyn11 wrote: @philly I don't see that happening. ESPN has turned hyper left in recent... [more](64)

    In

    Blue-Blog-a-Palooza: Ann Romney Edition!

    djthereplay wrote: By mkdawuss on August 29, 2012 6:17 PM Will John Gibson be having a "Red-B... [more](4)

    In

    No Joy in Kosville...Mighty Olby Has Struck Out

    djwolf76 wrote: "But the FOX-GOP relationship (which is far more distinguished and prevalen... [more](23)

    KO Mini Blog



    What's in the Olbermann Flood Feed?
    Subscribe to Olbermann Flood Feed:
    RSS/XML

    KO Countdown Clock


    Warning: mktime() [function.mktime]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/New_York' for 'EDT/-4.0/DST' instead in /home/owatch/www/www.olbermannwatch.com/docs/countdown.php on line 5
    KO's new contract with MSNBC ends in...
    0 days 0 hours 0 minutes

    OlbermannWatch.com "My Faves" Set

    OlbermannWatch.com Favorited Photos from other Flickr Users

    Got OlbyPhotos? See some on Flickr? DO NOT email us. Send us a FlickrMail instead. Include a link to the photo. If we like the photo you will see it displayed in the Olby Flickr Flood above.

    New to Flickr? Sign up for a FREE Flickr account!


    Got some OlbyVideo? See some on YouTube? DO NOT email us. Send us a YouTube Messages instead. Include a link to the video. If we like the video you will see it displayed in our favorites list in our YouTube page.

    New to YouTube? Sign up for a FREE YouTube account!

    Red Meat Blog
    Keith Olbermann Quotes
    Countdown Staff Writers

    If they're not on Keith's payroll...

    ...they should be...

    Crooks & Liars
    Daily Kos
    Eschaton
    Huffington Post
    Media Matters for America
    MyDD
    News Corpse
    No Quarter
    Raw Story
    Talking Points Memo
    Think Progress
    TVNewser
    Keith Lovers

    MSNBC's Countdown
    Bloggerman
    MSNBC Transcripts
    MSNBC Group at MSN

    Drinking with Keith Olbermann
    Either Relevant or True
    KeithOlbermann.org
    Keith Olbermann is Evil
    Olbermann Nation
    Olbermann.org
    Thank You, Keith Olbermann

    Don't Be Such A Douche
    Eyes on Fox
    Liberal Talk Radio
    Oliver Willis
    Sweet Jesus I Hate Bill O'Reilly

    Anonymous Rat
    For This Relief Much Thanks
    Watching Olbermann Watch

    Keith Olbermann Fanlisting Site I
    Keith Olbermann Fanlisting Site II
    Keith Olbermann Links
    Olberfans
    Sports Center Altar
    Nothing for Everyone

    Democratic Underground KO Forum
    Television Without Pity KO Forum
    Loony KO Forum (old)
    Loony KO Forum (new)
    Olberfans Forum (old)
    Olberfans Forum (new)
    Keith Watchers

    186k per second
    Ace of Spades HQ
    Cable Gamer
    Dean's World
    Doug Ross@Journal
    Extreme Mortman
    Fire Keith Olbermann
    Hot Air
    Inside Cable News
    Instapundit
    Jawa Report
    Johnny Dollar's Place
    Just One Minute
    Little Green Footballs
    Mark Levin
    Media Research Center
    Moonbattery.com
    Moorelies
    National Review Media Blog
    Narcissistic Views
    Newsbusters
    Pat Campbell Show
    Radio Equalizer
    Rathergate
    Riehl World View
    Sister Toldjah
    Toys in the Attic
    Webloggin
    The Dark Side of Keith Olbermann
    World According to Carl

    Thanks for the blogroll link!

    Age of Treason
    Bane Rants
    The Blue Site
    Cabal of Doom-De Oppresso Libre
    Chuckoblog
    Conservative Blog Therapy
    Conservathink
    Country Store
    Does Anyone Agree?
    The Drunkablog!
    Eclipse Ramblings
    If I were President of USA
    I'll Lay Down My Glasses
    Instrumental Rationality
    JasonPye.com
    Kevin Dayhoff
    Last Train Out Of Hell
    Leaning Straight Up
    Limestone Roof
    Mein BlogoVault
    NostraBlogAss
    Peacerose Journal
    The Politics of CP
    Public Secrets: from the files of the Irishspy
    Rat Chat
    Return of the Conservatives
    The Right Place
    Rhymes with Right
    seanrobins.com
    Six Meat Buffet
    Sports and Stuff
    Stout Republican
    Stuck On Stupid
    Things I H8
    TruthGuys
    Verum Serum
    WildWeasel

    Friends of OlbyWatch

    Aaron Barnhart
    Eric Deggans
    Jason Clarke
    Ron Coleman
    Victria Zdrok
    Keith Resources

    Google News: Keith Olbermann
    Feedster: Keith Olbermann
    Technorati: Keith Olbermann
    Wikipedia: Keith Olbermann
    Wikipedia: Countdown
    Wikiality: Keith Olbermann
    Keith Olbermann Quotes on Jossip
    Keith Olbermann Photos
    NNDB Olbermann Page
    IMDB Olbermann Page
    Countdown Guest Listing & Transcripts
    Olbermann Watch FAQ
    List of Politics on Countdown (by party)
    Mark Levin's Keith Overbite Page
    Keith Olbermann's Diary at Daily Kos
    Olbermann Watch in the News

    Houston Chronicle
    Playboy
    The Journal News
    National Review
    San Antonio Express
    The Hollywood Reporter
    The Journal News
    Los Angeles Times
    American Journalism Review
    Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
    St. Petersburg Times
    Kansas City Star
    New York Post/Page Six
    Washington Post
    Associated Press
    PBS
    New York Daily News
    Online Journalism Review
    The Washingon Post
    Hartford Courant
    WTWP-AM
    The New York Observer
    The Washington Post


    Countdown with Keith Olbermann
    Great Moments in Broadcast Journalism
    Great Thanks Hall of Fame
    Keith Olbermann
    MSM KO Bandwagon
    Olbermann
    Olbermann Watch Channel on You Tube
    Olbermann Watch Debate
    Olbermann Watch Image Gallery
    Olbermann Watch Polling Service
    OlbermannWatch
    OlbyWatch Link Roundup
    TVNewser "Journalism"

    July 2013
    September 2012
    August 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009
    August 2009
    July 2009
    June 2009
    May 2009
    April 2009
    March 2009
    February 2009
    January 2009
    December 2008
    November 2008
    October 2008
    September 2008
    August 2008
    July 2008
    June 2008
    May 2008
    April 2008
    March 2008
    February 2008
    January 2008
    December 2007
    November 2007
    October 2007
    September 2007
    August 2007
    July 2007
    June 2007
    May 2007
    April 2007
    March 2007
    February 2007
    January 2007
    December 2006
    November 2006
    October 2006
    September 2006
    August 2006
    July 2006
    June 2006
    May 2006
    April 2006
    March 2006
    February 2006
    January 2006
    December 2005
    November 2005
    October 2005
    September 2005
    August 2005
    June 2005
    May 2005
    April 2005
    March 2005
    February 2005
    January 2005
    December 2004
    November 2004

    Google

    Olbermann Watch Masthead

    Managing Editor

    Robert Cox
    olby at olbywatch dot com

    Contributors

    Mark Koldys
    Johnny Dollar's Place

    Brandon Coates
    OlbyWatch

    Chris Matthews' Leg
    Chris Matthews' Leg

    Howard Mortman
    Extreme Mortman

    Trajan 75
    Think Progress Watch

    Konservo
    Konservo

    Doug Krile
    The Krile Files

    Teddy Schatz
    OlbyWatch

    David Lunde
    Lundesigns

    Alex Yuriev
    Zubrcom

    Red Meat
    OlbyWatch



    Technorati Links to OlbyWatchLinks to OlbermannWatch.com

    Technorati Links to OlbyWatch Blog posts tagged with "Olbermann"

    Combined Feed
    (OlbyWatch + KO Mini-blog)

    Who Links To Me


    Mailing List RSS Feed
    Google Groups
    Subscribe to Olbermann Watch Mailing List
    Email:
    Visit this group



    XML
    Add to Google
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Subscribe with Bloglines
    Subscribe in NewsGator Online

    Add to My AOL
    Subscribe with Pluck RSS reader
    R|Mail
    Simpify!
    Add to Technorati Favorites!

    Subscribe in myEarthlink
    Feed Button Help


    Olbermann Watch, "persecuting" Keith since 2004


    October 10, 2011
    Olbermann Visits Drug Pushers and Peeps at Wall Street!

    He couldn't be bothered to attend a gathering of the 'predominately white' tea party, but the infamous, deplorable Keith Olbermann did find time to shuffle over to Wall Street and meet with his predominately white unwashed peeps.

    These photos, courtesy of the UK Daily Mail, document this historic occasion. It is not known if Oralmann took advantage of the marijuana and heroin sales on offer at the site. But, to use a classic Olby argumentation technique, he has so far refused to denounce the drug sellers and their criminal activities; he has yet to disassociate himself from their deadly trade. Just when will he do so?


    Bathtub Boy Bathtub Boy Bathtub Boy Bathtub Boy

    Comments are open!


    Posted by johnny dollar | Permalink | Comments (134) | | View blog reactions

    134 Comments

    Didn't you hear Johnny? The Daily Mail has no credibility because they take cheap shots at MKDAWUSS' favorite soccer team.

    Of course MKDAWUSS thinks Countdown, the Kos and Media Matters are "honest and reliable" so I think we might have a failure to communicate there.

    Go ahead Carlos. Talk about the Daily Mail and the "logistics" that have kept Olbermann away from the Tea Party for two-plus years.

    But don't talk about how Olbermann won't go to "Conservative Crackerfest" but will go to "Liberal Crackerfest" where you can brawl with guards at museums, s*** on police cars and buy drugs.

    Yeah, he couldn't go to a Tea Party even when he was formally invited. He responded by saying that he was attending his ailing father instead of offering to reschedule or, if he could not come to them, offering to have them in studio or transmit via satellite. In other words, MKULTRA, there were any number of ways that he could have made that meeting happen but you still believe this scheduling and logistics BS even knowing that he had all that time between transitioning for MSNBC to Current. How gullible!

    And I'm sure MKDAWUSS will counter with "his father WAS sick" or whatever.

    No one's gonna dispute that his father was sick but it was convenient of daddy to get ill every Friday and every time the Yankees were in town and every time a Republican won the New Jersey gubernatorial race.

    I digress. What get_a_grip said was true. Problem solved by inviting the Tea Party on your show. Shouldn't have been a problem for an "honest and reliable" journalist.

    Carlos, how many Tea Party members have been on Countdown since April 2009?

    Funny how Bill O'Reilly can get Ann Coulter, Bill Maher, Barney Frank, Dennis Kuchinich, Keith Ellison, Peter King, Jon Stewart, Herman Cain, Mitt Romney, Michele Bachmann and scores of others from all walks of the political spectrum on his show topped off with an interview with POTUS but Keith Olbermann can't get a couple of yokels with a "Taxed Enough Already" sign on his show.

    Must be logistics.

    "Must be logistics."

    Hey, don't blame UPS. It's not their fault!

    "Hey, don't blame UPS. It's not their fault!"

    lol

    Apparently Olbermann's paid staff isn't qualified enough to pick up a phone or write an e-mail to schedule an interview.

    At least that's what MKDAWUSS is telling us. He's big on the inside information.

    As an honorable journalist, as much as he and everyone else talks about the Tea Party (disparagingly), you would think that Olbermann would think it his duty, nay, his obligation to invite representation of the Tea Party on his show at least once to inform his viewers of an organization that, apparently, wields unthinkable power. You'd think Olbermann would jump at the chance to take such a force down a few pegs. Curious......

    Alright, I'm done beating that dead horse.

    I started a hash tag on twitter #wherewaskeith It's true if you think about it, he of course shows up at this "hippie rally" down in NYC, but yeah...where was Keith when the Tea Party ones were going on? Matter of fact, where was Keith during the RNC in '08? Oh yeah, back in NY thinking something was going to happen to him. Wuss

    I don't see any results yet for tweets with the #wherewaskeith hashtag.

    Like when some one jumps to his death at #occupysandiego (really,it happened). IT'S THE WPITWA! (link: http://t.co/UE9O1MDu )

    Bronze: THE HERMAN CAIN- It seems that Olby isn't a fan of 9-9-9 (saying it's not fair that the poor pay the same tax on their food as Cain will on his next BMW). But he makes the list of dishonor for making fun out of reporters "Gotcha" questions. How dare Mr. Cain. The press is never to be mocked!

    Then Olby insinuates that Cain hates the troops. Classy Keith. Really Classy.

    Silver: Lonesome Rhodes Beck- And the empire is fading for Glenn. Olby says that Beck lost 90% of his auidence when he got 'fired from fox' (lie) and moved to subscription model. Really, Keith. To bash someone else for low viewership? how's your ratings? But that's a different cow to bash on another day.

    Glenn is on the list for speaking to a half empty ballroom (as told by Gawker) at the values voters summit. Again, Kieth is one to talk.

    GOLD: RUSH!- And at the forefront, I am calling BULLSHIT on this story. In fact, i couln't stand to listen to the rest of it. It's about some woman whose car broke down in Tx. A cop arrested her for driving on the emergency lane. He had a heart attack and the cop followed her to the hospital and arrested her there anyway. And while in the cruiser, the cop listened to Rush's radio show, and the cop made racist comments. And olby thinks it's a case that she can sue Rush.

    The reason I call bullshit is because I've been in cop cars. My Aunt's ex husband is a sheriff's deputy and a reitered cop. Cop cars can't get either AM or FM. Just POLICE BAND!

    In short, this lady is lying and The False Murrow is lapping it up. Shameful.

    Another Award Winning Countdown to stupidity!

    )ps_ sorry for the spelling mistakes.

    Keith fits right in with the fleabaggers...unkempt, stinky, and stupid.

    "Ok @cjflan32,

    For starters, I gotta give you credit where you deserve credit.
    It's on the left or right side. I`m sorry @Johnny Dollar for WRONGFULLY thinking that he started this website to blast Keith Olbermann.
    I should have read the side bar there where it said who founded this website, instead of looking at it based on the one who posts the stories on here that we are commenting on.
    My bad there."

    And I'll give you the credit you deserve. You've been here a total of five minutes and unlike MKDAWUSS, who's been here for two years, you're smart enough to understand my words are my own and don't everyone with a broad brush.


    "There are things that I DO catch, and that I DON`T Catch.
    I DO catch when I feel like I`m being " double talked " to, or catch a load of 'double talk'."

    This is gonna end well.

    "I`m going to back, and without rehasing much of what I just said, I`m still going to ask it OVER, and OVER, until you or someone on here can help me out here with a more logical response.

    If you do not watch Countdown with Keith Olbermann on Current TV,
    and you believe that Countdown with Keith Olbermann's ratings are doing SO Poorly now that nobody's watching and he has fallen SO short of any relevancy now, Then why are you on here fussing about the views expressed by Keith Olbermann on his show?"

    Who said we don't watch? Who said we were "fussing?" What part of cracking a few ironic jokes isn't clear?

    Keith Olbermann is irrelevant. By his own standards. Seeing that there's things you "do catch" and "don't catch" I don't expect you to understand.


    "By the way, Keith Olbermann don`t always go on his TV Show and glorify himself all the time, that is ONLY when people in the media on our nation's airwaves who are CONServative Supporters do things like call Keith Olbermann a Pinhead, and claim that they are 'Fair and Balanced', like they are bigger and better than everybody else."

    I'm confused with what the "CONServatives" have to do with me. Guess I should take back that "paint with a broad brush" comment I made earlier.

    Perhaps you can explain to everyone how creating ratings demographics and bragging about being the No. 1 cable news shows when you're actually seventh is some kind of reactive measure to being called a "pinhead."

    Because if you actually knew anything you'd know that the majority of commentators in this country have taken to the spirit you suggest, which is to ignore those they feel are irrelevant. Guess you didn't "catch that" either.

    "That's right, that's probably what makes Bill O' Reilly so good, the fact that he and his colleagues at Fox News Channel makes entertainment and sports a part of their run on news themed monologue(s)."

    I must've missed that on the O'Reilly Factor last week. I'd take your word on the rest of Fox News but so far your word hasn't been very good.

    BTW, if you're gonna stick around you should know these little games where you justify Olbermann's bad behavior with Fox News' bad behavior ...in your world... don't work with me. I'm pretty vocal about FNC's issues as well as those who create issues that don't exist.

    "How about telling Mr. Robert Cox and Mr. Johnny Dollar about those People from Arizona who Keith Olbermann used his show while it was on MSNBC to make a fund in the attempt to pay for their life saving surgeries that their state's Medicare will not cover ..... because of their Rep. Sharron Angle (R) who will financially neglect their citizens while asking those citizens to vote for them .... EVEN if it means that those citizens end up dying."

    How about telling Olbermann about all the charity work Bill O'Reilly does, mainly but not limited to the Wounded Warrior Project? That never seems to come up during those Ted Baxter impressions.

    Are we getting the theme here now? Olbermann's minimal charity work is great but he never seems to give a s*** about anyone else's when he's calling them names.

    BTW Dwight, I'm curious as to what Sharron Angle could have done to help those poor people in Arizona when she REPRESENTED NEVADA!

    "I saw that, and I`m sorry. I do not take kindly to self serving CONServative Politicians who change the subjects to look like they are public servers. When Keith Olbermann takes these CONS to task (even though he has a loose tung occasionally), it's like I have been seeing this whole " Keith Olbermann is irrelevant " theme arrise."

    "Occasionally?" This must be a case of you not "catching" things again.

    Maybe now you could tell us why Olbermann only goes after "CONServatives?" Maybe in the Magical Kingdom conservatives are the bane of existence but in the real world bad behavior knows no political boundaries.

    "NO, Keith Olbermann is NOT irrelevant, ESPECIALLY when he gets persecuted on here in your posts."

    One good deed that you can't even get right (so one has to wonder if it actually happened) and all his sins are washed away?

    Please.

    "By the way, Keith Olbermann has NEVER said ANYTHING racist, or misogynist, nor has he lied on his shows."

    See next post.

    "Maybe, Keith Olbermann gets hypocritical on those on the other side who act hypocritical in our government and on our nation's airwaves."

    So what you're saying is Keith Olbermann is no better than everyone else, even the "CONServatives" he rails against?

    Thank you for clarifying.

    "By the way, Mr. Robert Cox, If you feel that Keith Olbermann is SO evil, maybe you have not met any of the citizens who Keith had to use his show and his loose tung on the airwaves, and his other efforts to defend."

    What citizens would those be?

    This clown wouldn't even leave his house to vote. Hell, he wouldn't even leave his house to do his job.

    Again, the people Olbermann goes after also help people out as well. Those facts never seem to come up on Countdown.

    And "tung"? Really?

    Great. It's bad enough I have to keep repeating this stuff to MKDAWUSS. Now I have to repeat it to the Prince of Epcot

    "By the way, Keith Olbermann has NEVER said ANYTHING racist,..."

    So Olbermann didn't sit and nod in approval while Janeane Garofalo called the Tea Party racist?

    How about "Chicken and Waffles?"

    http://newsbusters.org/blogs/ken-shepherd/2007/09/27/olbermanns-chicken-waffles-crack-passive-aggressive-racism

    http://www.youtube.com/user/olbywatch?blend=1&ob=4#p/search/1/TZTQOrAEgS4

    Then there's this whole "I won't go to this protest because it's a sea of white people and that's racist but I'll go to this protest which is also a sea of white people," thing we've been talking about.

    So in case you're still on Aladdin's magic carpet I'll explain it to you: By his own admission Olbermann is a racist.

    If you disagree with that take it up with him.

    "...or misogynist,..."

    So Olbermann didn't call Michelle Malkin a "mashed up meat bag with lipstick?"

    And he didn't berate an ESPN co-worker to tears?

    And he didn't say Paris Hilton was going to the police to file a "slut and battery" charge?

    And he didn't stalk Rebecca Lobo?

    And he didn't call for Hillary Clinton to be abused in a closet?

    And he didn't sit and laugh while Michael Musto was given free reign to accuse Carrie Prejean of being a man with breast implants

    I haven't even covered Sarah Palin, her daughter, or S.E. "You should've been aborted" Cupp. Even MKDAWUSS called that one out.

    No, no pattern of misogyny there.

    "...nor has he lied on his shows."

    Between his show and his Twitter account he's lied to a point that anyone who doesn't believe he's a liar doesn't follow Keith Olbermann very closely.

    Whew! I think it's time for Stewart to get out from under Pride Rock and come back to reality.

    A video for the ages - "Occupy Atlanta" bars black congressman from speaking.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3QZlp3eGMNI&feature=player_embedded

    Where did you get all that from, CJ?

    "Where did you get all that from, CJ?"

    The previous thread.

    "Silver: Lonesome Rhodes Beck- And the empire is fading for Glenn. Olby says that Beck lost 90% of his auidence when he got 'fired from fox' (lie) and moved to subscription model."

    10% of Beck's old ratings is still twice as many as Olbermann's current ratings, and no one is paying $10 a month to watch Olbermann

    "GOLD: RUSH!- And at the forefront, I am calling BULLSHIT on this story. In fact, i couln't stand to listen to the rest of it. It's about some woman whose car broke down in Tx. A cop arrested her for driving on the emergency lane. He had a heart attack and the cop followed her to the hospital and arrested her there anyway. And while in the cruiser, the cop listened to Rush's radio show, and the cop made racist comments. And olby thinks it's a case that she can sue Rush."

    From what I have heard the woman suing claimed Limbaugh was making the racist statements, not the cop. Did that change or did Olby get it wrong?

    I meant the stuff in your 9:30 AM comment.

    Never mind. I guess I needed to refresh when I wrote the comment before this one.

    It could have been either one, Pewp.

    Just checked over on Keith's twitter.

    He made a Nazi comparison. Comparing police action against the protesters to the Nazi "night of the long knives."

    "Police conduct overnight raids on Occupy in Boston, Seattle. At risk: St. Louis, Seattle, Dallas. This is the Night Of The Long Batons."

    From the man who objected to a comparison between Saddam Hussein and Hitler....he has compared police officers to Nazis.


    I actually got inot a debate with a lib today. He said that he had NEVER heard Democrats refer to Republicans as Nazis. He also said that he had heard Glenn Beck say that the protesters want to break into peoples homes and kill them then proceeded to call Beck a bunch of curse words. Naturally I said "Where did you hear that clip, who was the one who actually said that Beck said that,
    Who in the media will go on record to say that Beck said what the said, and where could I go to hear that clip? His response was classic:

    "I don't know, I haven't heard it but I wouldn't put it past Beck for saying it."

    This is the substance for everything in this American Standard known as Countdung with The False Murrow. Rip-n-Read material from far left wing blogs with no solid evidence (Cheney's Death Squads, err, now Obama's Drone Squads), and progressive propaganda organizations disguised as "Non-Profit".

    @bobbytomale, you see, Saddam hated Bush, Olby hates Bush. So Fat Ass considered Saddam a buddy.

    A few weeks ago, several people commented that doing these abstracts couldn't be a pleasant duty. So why do I do them when they could drive a person crazy. Well, simple answer.... I AM ALREADY CRAZY! So, I can't really do no more damage.

    Remember, I watch worsts, so you don't have to.


    Bronze: Benjamin John Francis Fodor AKA Phoenix Jones- For being a dumbass. Really, don't know any better way to put it. Guy thought two people were fighting and pepper sprayed them. Turned out they were dancing.

    Anyone who dresses up as a 'superhero' is a nut job.

    Silver: John McCain and Kay Hagen- For proposing a 'corporate Tax Holiday' for corporations to repatriot their money back to the US at a reduced rate. But here come Carl Levin, that POS said the last tax holiday cut 20k jobs. Olby thinks any money saved won't go to jobs, but will go to bonuses, which are evil, except when the VP of News at Current gets one. Then they are just peachy.

    GOLD-Jimmy Starline, member of the County Board of Commissioners in Camden County, Ga- For proposing that prison inmates replace firefighters in a move to save money. Gotta say, i don't really like that one. Pay for the firefighters.

    Get staples out tomorrow, stay frosty.

    Dang, @cjflan,
    That's right, Sharron Angle does represent Nevada.
    That STILL does not change what I sawin Keith Olbermann's last shows on MSNBC with those citizens of her state coming to Keith Olbermann for funding for their surgeries.
    That made me FURIOUS ... to no ends. Not at the citzens, Not at Keith Olbermann, but at Sharron Angle.

    I`ll tell you the rest later ..... when I`m relaxed.
    Because at least you all on here are willing and have the will to talk some issues ....... something that I wish the CONServatives in Congress would start having .... that is, if they can`t grow a heart enough to financially help out their citizens.

    - Dwight

    Dwight, I appreciate the fact that you can admit you have no idea what you're talking about. MKDAWUSS could learn a thing or two from you.

    "That's right, Sharron Angle does represent Nevada."

    Wrong. Sharron Angle DID represent Nevada. Five years ago.

    "That STILL does not change what I sawin Keith Olbermann's last shows on MSNBC with those citizens of her state coming to Keith Olbermann for funding for their surgeries."

    You don't even know what state it is. I'm wondering if this was even a real event.

    But you're still missing the point. Again, some alleged charity work doesn't make someone relevant. My father does charity work all the time, no one gives a damn.

    Furthermore, a lot of the people that draw his ire do ten times the charity work he does. Never never never never does this get mentioned on Countdown. Funny how you didn't "catch" that.

    And while you're "relaxing," feel free to Google some of those phrases I provided. Just because you were chugging honey with Winnie-The-Pooh when they were said doesn't mean they didn't happen.

    "You know what, These CONServatives in Congress have gotten SO financially neglective, and SO invasive that I LOVE IT when Keith Olbermann Vulgarly attacks them."

    That's class right there. Dwight must've learned that from The Little Mermaid.

    You heard it here folks William Dwight "djthereplay" Stewart Jr. just said it's ok for people like Keith Olbermann to "vulgarly attack" people who Dwight feels deserves it.

    So if I feel the need to call Dwight a "f****** retard" it's ok because, in my opinion, he deserves it.

    But I'm not Dwight and I refuse to stoop to his level.

    "What party controlled the House, 60 seats in the Senate and the White House and then proceeded to have three straight years of 1.4+ trillion dollar defecits? Here's a hint, it starts with democ and ends with rats."-pewp_head

    Indeed. From 2007-2011 the Democrats controlled the U.S. Congress. The 111th Congress was dominated by Democrats.

    Looking at the rest of the Bush presidency the 107th started as a 50/50 senate but for the most part was 51-49 Democrats when James Jeffords left the GOP. GOP had about 10-15 extra seats in the House.

    The 108th had a decent GOP majority.

    The 109th also had a GOP majority.

    This is probably all news to Dwight, who probably thought George Bush was President of the Senate and therefore controlled the Congress. And probably SCOTUS. Guess you don't learn too much about the three branches of government from Pocahontas.

    So according to Dwight, apparently Congress is only "financially neglective" when the GOP is in charge.

    Because pissing away billions of dollars to create a couple thousand jobs (if it even created that many) isn't "financially neglective."

    "No one talks about Olbermann except Olbermann. As for "pinhead", O'Reilly's trademark, he has a policy of not mentioning Olbermann at all and has not mentioned him in years. This drives Olby crazy, he hates being ignored. Most lunatics would rather get negative publicity over none and that definetly includes Olby."-pewp_head

    So true. Hell, when he got fired O'Reilly and Goldberg spent eight minutes on it and spent most of the time saying "we don't want to mention his name." Awful segment as I recall.

    "Is olby irrelevant? Yes. Does he have a small audience? Yes. Can small number of irrelevant people still do a lot of damage? Yes, and that is why this site will continue to monitor Olby and will not stop until he finally crawls back into his hole."

    Another great comment. Irrelevant people can still get a lot of attention. And cause a lot of damage.

    Doesn't Olberdork sort of look like a queer talking to that Occupy Wall St. crowd? Maybe his hatred of women comes from being a closet homosexual.

    "Doesn't Olberdork sort of look like a queer talking to that Occupy Wall St. crowd? Maybe his hatred of women comes from being a closet homosexual."

    I'd condemn this but if tonyome feels that Keith Olbermann deserves such a "vulgar attack" then that's that.

    I disagree with it though. He must've gotten to the gym during his time off. He looks pretty good for a change.

    "Furthermore, a lot of the people that draw his ire do ten times the charity work he does. Never never never never does this get mentioned on Countdown. Funny how you didn't "catch" that."

    You don't remember the one chart he showed way back when where he donated 25x the amount Bill-O donated to charity?

    "I`m going to back, and without rehasing much of what I just said, I`m still going to ask it OVER, and OVER, until you or someone on here can help me out here with a more logical response.”

    In other words, you aren’t leaving until this site is taken down.

    “If you… believe that Countdown with Keith Olbermann's ratings are doing SO Poorly now that nobody's watching and he has fallen SO short of any relevancy now, Then why are you on here fussing about the views expressed by Keith Olbermann on his show?"

    What do you care what our motivations are for coming here? You obviously just feel threatened by this website; so since you are so concerned, how about you just post here and substantively contradict what we say and therefore counter this site’s effectiveness?

    “Yes I do think that you are in a way playing into Keith Olbermann's hands by treating him like almost nobody watches him, or listens to him, and claiming that he's irrelevant.”

    Well, using your logic, I guess Olbermann is playing into Glenn Beck’s hands then; when are you going to start dogging him to stop laughing at Beck’s viewership?

    "By the way, Keith Olbermann has NEVER…lied on his shows."

    Is Olbermann not lying when he accuses Bill O’Reilly of inciting the murder of Dr. George Tiller despite the fact that there is absolutely no evidence that Scott Roeder knew O’Reilly from Adam and the fact that there were at least two assassination attempts on Tiller’s life before O’Reilly ever had a show or ever even mentioned his name on television suggesting that perhaps--just PERHAPS--that Tiller’s practice was fairly well known and that some people feel so strongly about the issue of abortion that they would kill over it without any encouragement from commentators?

    Was Olbermann not lying when he accused Glenn Beck of inciting Richard Paplowski to murder simply because Paplowski had one of Beck’s videos posted on his website--a video from which Olbermann took a quote out of context in an attempt to prove that Beck was promoting the FEMA prisons story even though Beck was doing the exact opposite by trying to debunk the story?

    Was Olbermann not lying when he accused Bernard Goldberg of inciting Jim Adkisson to murder simply because he referenced Goldberg’s book _100 People Who Are Screwing Up America_? Of course, Olbermann did not provide any quotes from the book that proved its inciting nature; you would think that someone with a nightly Worst Person In The World segment would want to differentiate himself from such supposed inciting invective; I mean, he even entertained the notion that the segment was potentially dangerous when he band the segment after the Arizona shooting, but I guess feeding his fans’ hatred proved more important. You see, his fans, like yourself who “LOVE IT when Keith Olbermann Vulgarly attacks” those with whom he disagrees, are hateful people and revel in hatred while ironically attributing everything the Right does to hatred and bad faith; so they demanded that he bring the segment back. You people make sick!

    Speaking of the Arizona shooting, was Olbermann not lying when he accused Sarah Palin of inciting Jared Loughner to murder despite the fact that his friends have come out saying that he is a liberal if he is political at all and is therefore much more likely to be swayed by the likes of Olbermann’s lapdog and founder of Daily Kos, Markos Moulitsas who also had Giffords targeted on a map and one of who’s bloggers was quoted as saying of her before the shooting that, "Today, just a little while ago, I saw on Andrea Mitchell Reports that Giffords voted against Nancy Pelosi as our minority leader. … Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords is dead to me now."

    Compulsively accusing people of inciting murder is very serious; therefore, you would think a responsible journalist would not be so reckless in his reportage.

    "You don't remember the one chart he showed way back when where he donated 25x the amount Bill-O donated to charity?"

    Look who's back. Nothing on this protest hypocrisy but plenty on Olbermann's charity work and nothing to prove it.

    No Carlos, I don't remember the chart. But I do have some thoughts about it:

    1. You sure that chart wasn't regarding Olbermann giving money to the IHTA Foundation after they told him to leave O'Reilly alone and go f*** himself?

    2. Considering you claim it was "his" chart I think this is a good time to remind you that this is a guy who created his own ratings demographic to show he had more ratings than his competitors. Just another of the tidbits you've ignored over the years.

    3. "Way back when" doesn't sound a whole lot like "lately." You really should proofread before writing.

    Thanks for another hack job Carlos! you and Dwight are doing a bang up job for the Olbermann fan club!

    I remember the chart. It's one where Oralmann took an on-air O'Reilly comment about how he would donate $1000 to a fund if one were ever created, and then lied that this was the sum total of O'Reilly's charitable giving. Then he made a chart that covered the one month in which Olby made a large charitable contribution and lied that this proved he gave more than O'Reilly.

    In fact, OlbyLiar never investigated, researched, or made any attempt to learn what O'Reilly gives to charity in any given month. O'Reilly's charitable giving starts with all his profits--ALL--from the sale of gear on his website. And then goes on from there. Instead, Edward R Olbermann flat-out lied that O'Reilly contributed $1000 and went on the air preening with a chart that was at least the SECOND time he bragged about how big his contribution was.

    http://www.olbermannwatch.com/archives/2009/04/great_moments_i_20.php

    How ironic that WUSS, in order to defend the sleazy Olbermann, chose an example where his hero flat-out lied about O'Reilly's charitable contributions. How about it WUSS? Do you apologize for citing an Olbermann lie as your evidence? Or do you apologize for Olbermann's smear of O'Reilly? If you were any kind of man you'd apologize for both.

    I'll be satisfied if you just stop lying.

    "Nothing on this protest hypocrisy"

    What hypocrisy? From Keith Olbermann or OlbermannWatch.com? I know the term "hypocrisy" is thrown around here quite a bit, amongst other labels...

    "What hypocrisy?"

    See the first five or so posts in this thread; then, if you conclude that that is not hypocrisy from Olbermann the man, please, do explain if you have it in you to do so. I won't hold my breath though.

    "See the first five or so posts in this thread"

    So it's OlbermannWatch.com then, got it.

    The first 5 posts seem to be more about attacking me than identifying Olbermann's hypocrisy.

    mkdawuss, Do you apologize for citing an Olbermann lie as your evidence?

    Or are you proud of spreading lies?

    What a cheap evasion of my challenge to you! We're not attacking you, we're responding to your idiocy (and I have to assume that's what it is when you ignore the vast majority of our counter arguments). We're also just spelling things out for you because you have proven yourself to be very dense.

    Ignoring the parts that address you directly, how can you defend the fact that Olbermann can go to the predominantly white Occupy Wall Street protests but cannot go to a Tea Party? You can't say that they never invited him because they DID and you can't say that he wouldn't waste his time going or something like that because he made it clear that would have if he could have---and let me make this abundantly clear: he COULD HAVE a hundred times over by now.

    Don't you think that as much as Olbermann has to say about the Tea Party and as important as the Left makes them out to be he should should invite some representation for a debate?

    Give me a real answer this time.

    To understand the mindset of a liberal, please see my post above. The defense of the left to slander the right with absolutely no evidence personifies Derangement Syndrome to a T. Even when challenged to present evidence, they can't. When sources of all these accusations from the left come from Media Matters, Think Propaganda, Crooks & Liars, Daily Kos, etc., a learned person could make an assumption that those sources are frauds.

    Hey cjflan32 !,

    I have a little news for you too, ok?

    The Democrats also had a few DINOs in the party who voted with the CONServative Republicans to excercise their Filibuster Power as the minority party with somethings in the senate when the Democrats HAD the majority. Remember, whatever bill(s) of legislation that are put together must pass BOTH HOUSES of Congress before it is signed into law by the President.

    Not only that, The Republicans No.1 Priority is point blank making President Obama a One Term President, above solving our nation's problems directly, by making President Obama into a do nothing President just living in the White House for 3 going on 4 Years, and trying to separate the government from serving its' people and
    trying to make us angry at Obama and taking back over congress and the presidency, that is all the Republicans are trying to do right now.

    And all these attacks that President Obama gets from CONServative Republicans in Congress.

    It takes Liberals in the media and Keith Olbermann's " Vulgar Attacks " treating CONServative Republicans like they are racists and nazis to make the CONServative Republicans in Congress chill out their " Socialist, Marxist, Communist, Anti-American, not born in America " attacks against Obama for a second, because President Obama has a "D" next to his name and he's trying to fix George Bush's and Richard Cheney's MESS. How sad and deplorable is that?

    Their neglection of citizens have gotten SO bad that people who are even struggling to get a job and are left alone to nothing right now are having to put together protests,
    like "Occupy (Fill in the blank with where ever it is )" .

    It saddens me that some of us citizens who are lucky to be living halfway stable in this era of this country right now are lumping in the people who are verbally fighting for their continued survival without bringing guns, or without committing acts of violence, with those who are smuggling in and selling drugs and cigarette plants.

    Particularly when Some of us citizens would rather have a Congress that invest Our Taxpayer Dollars and Cents through Unsafe Oil Drilling Practices and attempting to ship our troops overseas to their deaths in Holy Wars blown out of peportion, over A Congress investing OUR taxpayer dollars and cents towards POSITIVE American Products made in America, instead of China and other countries overseas, safe business practices.
    This is what we are reducing some people to, " The DRUG Smuggling business ". SICKENING TO NO ENDS. I don`t play that mess.

    DON`T EVER DO THAT MESS, and TRY TO COME ON MY TV SCREEN, ATTEMPTING TO BUG AND BRIBE VOTES AND ENERGY OUT OF ME.

    I DO NOT TAKE KINDLY TO SCAMS !!!!

    Call me (whatever), BUT That's where My Definition of " Let Freedom Ring " becomes " Let the Keith Olbermann's Vulgar Tung Ring ".

    Bill O` Reilly's Speech has gotten SO bad, calling someone a baby killer, because they were doing their job that they were appointed to do by a person who can`t take care of their unborn children, as much as I hate even the thought of an abortion, that Bill O` Reilly's Baby Killer Speech caused someone TO MURDER (Shoot Dr. George Tiller to death with a shotgun), and NOBODY is saying anything about that.

    But Keith Olbermann's Vulgar Language and opposite views on the other hand as subhuman as vulgar language is has NOT caused anyone to MURDER ANYBODY, and all of a sudden ..... THE WHOLE WORLD IS COMING TO AN END. WHOOP - DE - DOO !!!
    Really, If you are gonna blast Keith Olbermann on Vulgar Lanuage, then BLAST US ALL !!!! HE IS NOT THE ONLY ONE WHO HAS SPOKEN THAT WAY.

    So, Chill out.

    At least Keith Olbermann's Vulgar mouth doesn`t EVER refer to a mentally or physically disabled person as a retard.

    REMEMBER THIS the next time you wanna bust someone over
    " VULGAR LANGUAGE ".

    - Dwight



    MKDAWUSS, the word "hypocrite" gets used a lot because you are one. And because Olbermann is one. Deal with it.

    "The first 5 posts seem to be more about attacking me than identifying Olbermann's hypocrisy."

    Do you eat paint chips for breakfast? You actually said Olbermann couldn't get a Tea Party representative on Countdown because of "logistics" and that's some sort of "attack?"

    Aren't you the one that supports criticism using the words and actions of the person? Own it son.

    "What a cheap evasion of my challenge to you! We're not attacking you, we're responding to your idiocy (and I have to assume that's what it is when you ignore the vast majority of our counter arguments)."

    Let me be clear to Carlos: I'm doing both. You come here and you post a bunch of stuff and when it turns out you don't know what you're talking about it's like you were never here. And

    The best part about my attacks are they're attacks Olbermann has used in the past. So Carlos just has to suck it up because if he gets upset about it I'll call him a, wait for it, HYPOCRITE.

    Olbermann is trash and you know it. But he's the best outlet for you to hear all the things you want to hear so you just write it off as ends justify the means.

    Honestly, when you hit 25 you're gonna come back here and thank us. And if you're already 25 then it won't be a problem for long because people like you tend not to look both ways when crossing the street.

    "Not only that, The Republicans No.1 Priority is point blank making President Obama a One Term President, above solving our nation's problems directly, by making President Obama into a do nothing President just living in the White House for 3 going on 4 Years, and trying to separate the government from serving its' people and
    trying to make us angry at Obama and taking back over congress and the presidency, that is all the Republicans are trying to do right now."

    djthereplay, isn't it the goal of one political party to make the president of the one in power a "One Term President"? I remember in 2005, Democrats were already holding Presidential debates to take back 2008. No offense, but you sound like an absolute idiot. I think you do not understand the intelligence of the people on this discussion board because your sophmoric logic doesn't fly with me. If republicans, as you say, are doing nothing to solve this nation's problems, then why is Obama directing his CZARS to just pass things WITHOUT CONGRESSIONAL AUTHORITY?

    "The Democrats also had a few DINOs in the party who voted with the CONServative Republicans to excercise their Filibuster Power as the minority party with somethings in the senate when the Democrats HAD the majority. Remember, whatever bill(s) of legislation that are put together must pass BOTH HOUSES of Congress before it is signed into law by the President."

    And that has what to do with anything? Now you want to blame people that pretend to be true liberals but really aren't? I'm curious as to what legislation was held up because of the DINO vote. I'm sure you have the answer to that.

    Regardless, you want to live in this world where the GOP is the bane of everyone's existence and the Democrats are incorruptible men of the people then feel free. It's your problem, not mine.

    "Not only that, The Republicans No.1 Priority is point blank making President Obama a One Term President, above solving our nation's problems directly, by making President Obama into a do nothing President just living in the White House for 3 going on 4 Years, and trying to separate the government from serving its' people and trying to make us angry at Obama and taking back over congress and the presidency, that is all the Republicans are trying to do right now."

    Yeah, because the Democrats never made it a priority to make George Bush a one termer. Or regain control of the Congress. Never.

    It's politics genius. Neither party is clean. They both want to be in power. You think Nancy Pelosi gives a s*** about you?

    "And all these attacks that President Obama gets from CONServative Republicans in Congress."

    And all the attacks the President Bush got from DemocRATS in Congress don't count right? Because he deserved the "vulgar attacks," right? In your world...

    "It takes Liberals in the media and Keith Olbermann's " Vulgar Attacks " treating CONServative Republicans like they are racists and nazis to make the CONServative Republicans in Congress chill out their " Socialist, Marxist, Communist, Anti-American, not born in America " attacks against Obama for a second, because President Obama has a "D" next to his name and he's trying to fix George Bush's and Richard Cheney's MESS. How sad and deplorable is that?"

    The hypocrisy in your comments are astounding. Again, it's your opinion, O-PIN-ION, that Republicans deserve such comments. Because God forbid should we disagree with them in a civil and adult manner.

    No. Let's call the President "Idiot-in-Chief." Let's wish death on Dick Cheney. Let's call Sarah Palin a c***rag. Let's call Herman Cain an "oreo."

    How would you feel if I started calling your mother a "c***rag" Dwight? Based solely on the stance of I don't like you and your politics?

    Because that's what you're telling me right now. Be rude and call people names BECAUSE YOU DON'T LIKE THEM. That what they teach you at Disney World?

    And don't even bother coming back with "the CONServatives do it all the time." So what do you do? Stoop to their level. Or they stoop to yours. Whatever. No wonder no one in this country can get along. You're an embarrassment.

    Fuck the rest of your post. Someone else deal with this guy.

    And you just proved djthereplay's point.

    "I remember the chart."

    Ahh it's all coming back to me. I knew it had something to do with the It Happened to Alexa Foundation.

    Notice how that chart doesn't cite a single source? Little strange coming from what Carlos claims is an "honest and reliable journalist."

    It's all laid out in the old thread MKDAWUSS. And now that Johnny Dollar has confirmed you've lied again you've magically disappeared.

    "Notice how that chart doesn't cite a single source? Little strange coming from what Carlos claims is an "honest and reliable journalist."

    I want to see documentation of his donations to political AND non-profit organizations along with O'Reillys. Then we will be able to see who is telling the truth. If I were a betting man, I would say that O'Reilly still beats him in a mile for contributions to that Organization OVER THE YEARS. The False Murrow cited a 1 day contributions. I will give him the benefit of the doubt, but man up and show your papers!

    "At least Keith Olbermann's Vulgar mouth doesn`t EVER refer to a mentally or physically disabled person as a retard."

    djthereplay, Please explain this show segment:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XwdxAKlNmk

    "And you just proved djthereplay's point."

    Unbelievable. I'm really just shocked right now.

    First off, if you are gonna talk, and you shouldn't, but if you are gonna talk then apologize for that "chart argument" you lied about. Christ I didn't even know what you were talking about and I was closer to the ballpark than you.

    Secondly, in January you were going off the rails about the rhetoric in this county. Now we have a guy who goes around saying it's ok to call people names if you don't like their politics and what do you do? You come after me.

    HYPOCRITE. AND STUPID. THAT'S A FACT NOW. YOU. ARE. STUPID.

    And since it's obvious your illiteracy issues kicked in again, it's obvious you didn't see the part where I said "FUCK. THE. REST. OF. YOUR. POST."

    Maybe I proved his point, maybe I didn't. I don't know. But I'm not going to read the comments of someone who admits it's ok to call someone every name in the book because of their politics.

    But thank you for once again proving mine. One unintelligent, ill conceived, ill informed comment after another coming from your computer.

    It's really astounding.

    "The False Murrow cited a 1 day contributions."

    And MKDAWUSS fell for it. The lengths people will go to defend this guy.

    Yeah Carlos, I bet you're gonna say "the lengths 'you all' go to smear him."

    Tell us where we're going wrong then. Starting with this "chart."

    "djthereplay, Please explain this show segment."

    I'll explain it for you wolf:

    According to Dwight, CONServative Sarah Palin is a bitch because she's a CONServative and deserves to have a retarded baby. And Keith Olbermann should use his "VULGAR TUNG" to insult this CONServative and her baby.

    And MKDAWUSS is for it. Because apparently MKDAWUSS doesn't give a shit about nasty rhetoric anymore.

    "First off, if you are gonna talk, and you shouldn't, but if you are gonna talk then apologize for that "chart argument" you lied about. Christ I didn't even know what you were talking about and I was closer to the ballpark than you."

    I didn't lie. That showed that KO donated far more than his competition. He probably still does.


    "Secondly, in January you were going off the rails about the rhetoric in this county."

    And Keith was (and still is) trying to be part of the solution instead of the problem when it came to problematic rhetoric. DJTheReplay cited some examples of what problematic rhetoric led to.


    "But I'm not going to read the comments of someone who admits it's ok to call someone every name in the book because of their politics."

    There's a list of people you (and the rest of OlbermannWatch.com) have done that to. So what does that make you?

    ""But I'm not going to read the comments of someone who admits it's ok to call someone every name in the book because of their politics."

    No, but you idolize and defend a person that calls everyone that disagrees with the President on pure philosophy Nazis, Fascists, Homophobes, racists, sexists, Teabaggers, Douchenozzles, criminals, assholes, etc, etc,. Tell me when O'Reilly actually had a guest that came on his show and called someone a douchenozzle.

    "Fuck the rest of your post. Someone else deal with this guy."

    I hear that! After today, blogging here and elsewhere, my patience is about shot. It's like they really are brain dead. I don't even think they're stupid; I think there is seriously something wrong upstairs. Deranged is a good word for it dj.

    I will be back tomorrow and explain myself and "deal with this guy" as best I can; you've been doing a fine job up till now cj.

    Until then, WUSS, I'm still waiting for an answer to MY challenge. What exactly goes through your mind when you decide to ignore something?

    "That showed that KO donated far more than his competition. He probably still does."

    DID YOU EVEN WATCH THE VIDEO? THAT CHART YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT SHOWED KEITH OLBERMANN DONATING $25,000 TO ONE CHARITY. THEREFORE, IN THAT PARTICULAR MONTH (BY OLBERMANN'S OWN ADMISSION) WHEN HE MADE THAT DONATION HE DONATED 25 TIMES MORE MONEY THAN BILL O'REILLY DID. WHAT A CHAMPION OF THE PEOPLE.

    ONE. MONTH. TO. ONE. CHARITY. THAT DIDN'T EVEN INCLUDE THE SALES FROM BILLOREILLY.COM. THAT'S ALL IT WAS. HOW IGNORANT CAN YOU POSSIBLY BE?

    "I didn't lie."

    FINE. YOU DIDN'T LIE. THAT MEANS YOU'RE NOT SMART ENOUGH TO UNDERSTAND THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A MONTH AND A LIFETIME. BRILLIANT CARLOS, YOU JUST ADMITTED TO EVERYONE YOU'RE LACK OF INTELLIGENCE.

    AND WHAT DOES "PROBABLY" MEAN? DOES THE WORD "FACTS" HAVE ANY BEARING IN YOUR LIFE? IF HE DOES GIVE MORE TO CHARITY, PROVE IT! THAT WOULD SHUT "YOU ALL" UP PRETTY FUCKING QUICK, WOULDN'T IT?

    "And Keith was (and still is) trying to be part of the solution instead of the problem when it came to problematic rhetoric. DJTheReplay cited some examples of what problematic rhetoric led to."

    FUNNY. HE DIDN'T CITE KEITH'S "PROBLEMATIC RHETORIC." OH WAIT, HE DID. AND SAID IT WAS OK. CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG CARLOS, BUT DIDN'T JOE "DELUSIONAL LIAR" LIEBERMAN, S.E. "YOU'RE PARENTS SHOULD'VE HAD YOU ABORTED" CUPP AND ALLEN "BATSHIT CRAZY" WEST COME AFTER THIS ALLEGED NEWFOUND CIVILITY?

    THAT'S WHAT I THOUGHT. YEAH, HE'S TRYING REAL HARD.

    "There's a list of people you (and the rest of OlbermannWatch.com) have done that to. So what does that make you?"

    LIKE WHAT? NEVERMIND THE FACT THAT I (AND NEITHER IS ANYONE HERE AT OLBERMANN WATCH) AM NOT A DEMOCRAT GOING AROUND TOUTING THE "NEW CIVILITY" WHILE I ACCUSE EVERYONE AND THEIR BROTHER OF BEING MURDERERS WHO HATE BLACKS AND WOMEN, WHO THE FUCK HAVE I INSULTED IN THE MANNER YOU CLAIM I HAVE?

    YOU? FOR THE BILLIONTH TIME, THE INSULTS I LEVEL ON YOU HAVE A POINT. AND YOU CAN'T SAY SHIT ABOUT THEM BECAUSE THEY CAME STRAIGHT FROM OLBERMANN'S PLAYBOOK.

    DWIGHT? HE JUST SAID IT'S OK TO CALL PEOPLE NAMES IF YOU DON'T LIKE THEM. SO GUESS WHAT? I DON'T LIKE DWIGHT SO I THINK HE'S A DICKHEAD! HIS GAME, HIS RULES.

    AND OLBERMANN? SAME DEAL. HE USED TO MAKE FUN OF LIMBAUGH'S WEIGHT ALL THE TIME. THEN SOMEBODY AT OLBERMANN WATCH CALLS HIM A "FAT ASS" AND ALL OF A SUDDEN YOU'RE UPSET?

    AND LET'S NOT FORGET THE OTHER FACT THAT YOU SHOT FROM THE HIP AGAIN WHEN YOU SAID "LIST OF PEOPLE." YOU DON'T HAVE A LIST OF PEOPLE AND THEREFORE DON'T HAVE ANY PROOF FOR YOUR ACCUSATIONS. LIAR AGAIN.

    CARLOS, YOU'RE LITTLE KEITHY CHARITY DEBACLE ALONE PROVES IT'S TIME FOR YOU TO STOP TALKING.

    "No, but you idolize and defend a person that calls everyone that disagrees with the President on pure philosophy Nazis, Fascists, Homophobes, racists, sexists, Teabaggers, Douchenozzles, criminals, assholes, etc, etc,. Tell me when O'Reilly actually had a guest that came on his show and called someone a douchenozzle."

    You better not be talking to me wolf. I've taken you to task before and I'll do it again.

    "I will be back tomorrow and explain myself and "deal with this guy" as best I can; you've been doing a fine job up till now cj."

    Don't bother.

    "Until then, WUSS, I'm still waiting for an answer to MY challenge. What exactly goes through your mind when you decide to ignore something?"

    Please, he thinks because Olbermann donated to one charity in one month two years ago that means he gives more to charity than Bill O'Reilly has in his entire life.

    Bill O'Reilly sells a bunch of shit with his name and face on it and it all goes to charity. I'm curious MKDAWUSS, where did the money for those MSNBC KO bobbleheads go?

    Even if BillO didn't have a Web Site, there's more than one way to help out a charity. Example: How about that Wounded Warriors poster auction signed by the living POTUS'? The winning bid was $60,000. The the guy rounded up to $200,000. And others bought the facsimile posters netting $200,000.

    How much is that MKDAWUSS? 400,000 DOLLARS. DID YOU HEAR THAT MKDAWUSS? BILL O'REILLY HELPED RAISE 400,000 DOLLARS.

    DOES THAT MAKE SENSE TO YOU MKDAWUSS? BILL O'REILLY GOT JIMMY CARTER, GEORGE H.W. BUSH, BILL CLINTON, GEORGE W. BUSH AND BARACK OBAMA TO SIGN A FUCKING POSTER AND IT RAISED 400,000 DOLLARS.

    DID YOU AND ALL YOUR COUNTDOWN BUDDIES RAISE 400,000 DOLLARS THIS MONTH? DIDN'T THINK SO.

    IN THE WORDS OF D-GENERATION X, I GOT TWO WORDS FOR YA...

    @mkdawuss,

    That's right, That's another thing that maybe I should have included in my post about more of Keith Olbermann's Charitable contributions.
    Thank you. Actually mkdawuss, I`m sorry that in my comments that I may sound as I am condoning swearing. Remember the word that I called it, subhuman. If anything else of my comments falls flat, remember this. We are living in a very subhuman time with our politics, and trying to solve our nation's biggest problems.
    ..... Unfortunatly, to some of us, and some in congress, trying to solve problems civily has become the boulevards to making new problems.

    Sometimes, I feel like I`m being treated as some greedy person's or politician's walking matt, if I`m not the kind of welcoming matt that they want to put any money on. And they just step on me through their actions in Congress.

    You know what sickens me, @cjflan32 ?,

    Maybe YOU need to take a page from mkdawuss in looking past Keith Olbermann's dirty words in his messages, and start opening your heart to Keith Olbermann is actually trying to do.

    BTW, I call Sarah Palin a CONServative, because She is a Conservative Republican who politically acts like a CON, and she should not be doing that, especially when she has a child with down syndrome.

    It's easy for you to cover for a Conservative Republican Mother who gets rich from acting like a CON while having a child with down syndrome, but when it comes to a mother who is NOT as fortunate as Sarah Palin is, especially when she has an autistic child ... like me,
    that's when you get good and tough, do you?
    Why not tell djwolf76 about that fact.

    What a bad role of the dice that life is giving Little Hector Palin,
    because his mother makes her money off politically scamming American Taxpayers, Citizens, and Consumers out of their dollars and cents, because His Mother is TOO BIG of a CON to make money off contributing her time to something BIGGER THAN HERSELF.

    Money going into those who are contributing their time to something bigger than themselves is what our labor system and work force is all about, or what I thought it's supposed to be about.

    At least that's the way it was when I was an employee at a country club in my town.

    - Dwight

    Here's the thing, cjflan32,

    You just told mkdawuss that the insults you level on him have a point.
    Why?, because those insults are coming out of your mouth against those who disagree with you?

    " THE INSULTS I LEVEL ON YOU HAVE A POINT . "
    When you do that, it's ultamitly supposed to be seen as fine and dandy. But like, when someone like Keith Olbermann does that VERY SAME THING as you stated to mkdawuss " INSULTS HE LEVELS HAS A POINT ", YOU ACT LIKE IT's THE BIGGEST TRAGEDY ON EARTH, and IT's ALL LIES, THIS AND THAT.

    Clean up YOUR OWN Rhetoric, before trying to clean up someone elses's.

    - Dwight

    Oh, @djwolf76,

    Thanks for the youtube link to the video of Keith Olbermann talking about Sarah Palin. Also, I watched the show at the time, so thanks for refreshing my memory.

    Keith Olbermann NEVER attacked Sarah Palin's Disabled Child,
    He attacked Sarah Palin, herself.

    My Point still stands that Keith Olbermann NEVER refered to a disabled child as a retard.

    - Dwight

    Olberdork is also a racist. He attacked Herman Cain. Using his own standards, that makes him a filthy racist.

    "Thank you. Actually mkdawuss, I`m sorry that in my comments that I may sound as I am condoning swearing."-Dwight, 11/13

    Where would MKDAWUSS, or anyone for that matter, ever get the idea that you condone swearing?

    "But, when it comes down to the issues, at least some of the things that come out of Keith Olbermann's Vulgar loose tung has some truth to it, when it matters."-Dwight,

    "You know what, These CONServatives in Congress have gotten SO financially neglective, and SO invasive that I LOVE IT when Keith Olbermann Vulgarly attacks them. I LOVE when Keith whips their tails."-Dwight, 11/12

    "It takes Liberals in the media and Keith Olbermann's " Vulgar Attacks " treating CONServative Republicans like they are racists and nazis to make the CONServative Republicans in Congress chill out their " Socialist, Marxist, Communist, Anti-American, not born in America " attacks against Obama for a second, because President Obama has a "D" next to his name and he's trying to fix George Bush's and Richard Cheney's MESS."-Dwight, 11/12

    "Call me (whatever), BUT That's where My Definition of 'Let Freedom Ring' becomes 'Let the Keith Olbermann's Vulgar Tung Ring'."-Dwight, 11/12

    Let's see that again:

    "I`m sorry that in my comments that I may sound as I am condoning swearing."

    MAY sound?

    "...at least some of the things that come out of Keith Olbermann's Vulgar loose tung has some truth to it..."

    "...I LOVE IT when Keith Olbermann Vulgarly attacks them..."

    "It takes Liberals in the media and Keith Olbermann's 'Vulgar Attacks...'"

    "Let the Keith Olbermann's Vulgar Tung Ring" (it's actually incredible that an adult doesn't know how to spell "tung")

    So you don't condone swearing but you "LOVE IT" when Olbermann gets "vulgar" with people who "deserve" it.

    LOVE IT. Your words. LOVE IT.

    Rough week for MKDAWUSS and it's only Thursday.

    First he pretends to be Olbermann's secretary to make excuses as to why the Tea Party hasn't popped up on Countdown since it's inception. "Logistics" he said, which I don't think has anything to do with scheduling guests.

    Then MKDAWUSS lied about me defending, what was it, "Beck, Limbaugh, etc." I asked him for proof and he disappeared for a day and didn't bring it up again.

    Then, speaking of the Tea Party, MKDAWUSS just pretends Olbermann never called them racist because they're predominantly white ("Where are the black people?"). Why? Because last week Olbermann went and hung out with a predominantly white group of protesters.

    The best one was this "charity chart" MKDAWUSS brought up. According to MKDAWUSS Olbermann's donations to one charity in one month two years ago means he gives more to charity that Bill O'Reilly.

    And he "probably" still does, even though MKDAWUSS can't prove it.

    Let me explain it to you again: You got it wrong. Olbermann's own words say you got it wrong. And since you said you didn't lie that only leaves one explanation:

    You once again rambled off something you didn't have the first clue about.

    Wanna triple down on that one Carlos? Better yet, you should accuse Johnny Dollar of doctoring the video. That would be hilarious.

    "According to MKDAWUSS Olbermann's donations to one charity in one month two years ago means he gives more to charity that Bill O'Reilly."

    This is more lying. As I said, Olbermann LIED when he claimed Bill gave only $1000 a month. Oralmann never researched anything about O'Reilly's contributions, which based on just Factor gear sales alone probably dwarf Oralmann's. The $1000 is made up. The chart is a lie, and anyone who cites is perpetuates a lie, and is therefore a liar.

    We know what WUSS is, but it's really no surprise is it?

    "We know what WUSS is, but it's really no surprise is it?"

    He said he didn't lie. It could just be he didn't know what he was talking about the first time, then didn't know what he was talking about the second time. Given MKDAWUSS' history it's certainly plausible.

    Of course now that it's been explained in great detail that it covered the span of one month and used a fake number this chart no longer exists in MKDAWUSSville.

    "...which based on just Factor gear sales alone probably dwarf Oralmann's."

    Again with the "probably." Can we settle this?

    Off the top of my head, Bill O'Reilly has a Web Site dedicated to charity year round, the $750,000 he raised when Obama signed his Super Bowl interview notes and helped raise $400,000 for Wounded Warriors on top of what he personally gives.

    And also off the top of my head Olbermann donated $25,000 to IHTA after berating them for a couple weeks, had those free clinics Bill Clinton wanted nothing to do with and this children's surgery thing that's allegedly all Sharron Angle's fault.

    This is probably the part where Carlos explains that Olbermann paid for those all by himself. Can't wait to hear that.

    “It takes Liberals in the media and Keith Olbermann's " Vulgar Attacks " treating CONServative Republicans like they are racists and nazis to make the CONServative Republicans in Congress chill out their " Socialist, Marxist, Communist, Anti-American, not born in America " attacks against Obama for a second”

    So you ADMIT that the racist and Nazi attacks are just disingenuous political LIES! So you ADMIT that you think it is the media’s job to come to the Left’s defense. You best never say “What liberal media?” to me after that.

    “Socialist, Marxist, Communist”

    This is the difference between the Left and the Right; the Right keep their criticism in the realm of politics while the Left, by YOUR OWN ADMISSION, attribute honest differences of opinion to non-political ulterior motives like racism, homophobia, sexism, apathy, greed, obstruction, and, yes, anti-Americanism (see Nancy Pelosi on the Tea Party or the “They want the country to fail” meme). With the Right’s method you can actually compare the ideologies of liberalism and socialism; it isn’t just reckless, unconfirmed, race card psychoanalysis.

    “not born in America "

    Despite our dishonest media’s (again, YOUR ADMISSION) incessant attempts to stoke that theory, it was never mainstream among the Right. But you have an interesting chicken or the egg argument going here. So you think that these attacks from the Left are meant to counteract attacks from the Right? Are you sure the current attacks from the Right are not a counteractive measure against accusations that Bush stole the election, was behind 9/11, lied about WMDs in order to launch an illegal war for oil, Dick Cheney was actually president, etc. etc.? The Left have plenty of conspiracy theories and I assure you they are more widely embraced than the Birther nonsense.

    “Bill O` Reilly's Speech has gotten SO bad, calling someone a baby killer, because they were doing their job that they were appointed to do by a person who can`t take care of their unborn children, as much as I hate even the thought of an abortion, that Bill O` Reilly's Baby Killer Speech caused someone TO MURDER (Shoot Dr. George Tiller to death with a shotgun), and NOBODY is saying anything about that.”

    It’s like you didn’t read a word I said! You have absolutely no proof that Scott Roeder even knew who Bill O’Reilly was or even if he had cable news, or for that matter, a television; but you are sure beyond any shadow of a doubt that O’Reilly incited him to murder. There’s your Derangement Syndrome djwolf.

    That is pure PREJUDICE and INDOCTRINATION. You and Olbermann are asserting that, “A occurred, then B occurred; therefore, A caused B.” That is a logical FALLACY known as post hoc ergo propter hoc. So you see, it’s not just about “vulgar language;” I go straight for content and logic of Olbermann’s arguments.

    It is blatantly obvious that you do not even know what O’Reilly said and will not even bother to find out what he actually said outside of whatever filtered version you’ve heard because you are blinded by Olberman’s hatred of O’Reilly and, therefore, YOUR hatred of O’Reilly.

    It was not just one speech; it was persistent reporting that involved inside sources, former patient testimonies, and prosecutions. Perhaps as someone who HATES even the THOUGHT of an abortion you would shudder at the suspicions that Tiller would perform LATE term abortions all the way up until birth for a proper fee, even on minors and without consent of parents. O’Reilly did not invent the “The Tiller the Baby Killer” name; he just reported that that was how MANY referred to him.

    “Maybe YOU need to take a page from mkdawuss in looking past Keith Olbermann's dirty words in his messages, and start opening your heart to Keith Olbermann is actually trying to do.”

    Again, it’s not just about “dirty words;” it’s about LIES and cheap political tactics and poor logic; and frankly, even when his attacks are stripped of their vulgarity, they don’t amount to anything more than petty sniping on people whom Olbermann HATES.

    “opening your heart”

    I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again; if you disagree with the Left’s solution to a problem, they accuse you of being in favor of the problem.

    No matter what sincere reason you might have for being against abortion, to the Left you are ANTI women in general.

    No matter what sincere reservations you might have against Climate Change or the Theory of Evolution, to the Left you are ANTI science in general.

    No matter what sincere objection you might have against teachers unions or if you happen to believe that money cannot buy a good education, to the Left you are ANTI education in general.

    If you should happen to disagree about how and to what extent we should help the poor, to the Left you hate the poor in general.

    No matter what your religion states and no matter if you truly believe that marriage is a social stabilizer and therefore should not be redefined (at least not without the consent of the people), if you are against gay marriage, to the Left you are homophobic and generally an intolerant hater.

    And finally, if you should happen to disagree with how to handle healthcare, to the Left you want someone to die.

    And unfortunately djtherapy, you have such a deep-seated hatred of the Right that you eat this BS up.

    When Fat Ass's web staff doesn't post video of Worst Persons in the World..... IT'S THE WPITWA!

    and after reading the transcript.... I CAN SEE WHY! If I were the VP of News of Current, I woulnd't want it up either.

    Bronze: BILL-O!!!! For his interview with Cornell West and Tavis Smiley. It seems if you don't kiss Mr. West and Smiley's asses, it's a sign that you are a racist. Just by looking at the transcript, the Countdown Selective Editing Crew worked overtime. It's nothing more than a collection of disjointed out of context quips. And worth no further scrutiny.

    Silver: Michelle Bachmann: Seems that Olby got a scoop, that Bachmann is no longer running for President. Bet it's news to her. Keith said that Bachmann thinks that Obama is trying to destroy Medicare (like when he had 500 billion removed to try to pay for Obama Care?) and Olby says that stupid and she's the only one who heard it.

    But Olby's problem is this quote "I am a federal tax lawyer. That’s what I do for a living." and "I am 55. I spent my whole life in the private sector. I get job creation, too."

    Olby correctly says that she was a state senator for 6 years and Congresswoman for 5. But The False Murrow fails to see that SHE STILL HAD HER JOB AS A TAX ATTORNEY!!!!! Private sector, She did both. Semantics is Olby's best play and it's a losing one.

    GOLD!!!!!:Republican State Representative Curry Todd of Tennessee and Republican State Representative Brad Drake of Florida. Both for supporting THOSE EVIL GUNS!!!!!!

    Mr. Todd for supporting a bill to allow guns in bars. Then got arrested for DUI and having a gun in the car. GUNS ARE EVIL and THOSE WHO LOVE GUNS ARE EVIL!

    Mr. Drake for wanting to change the Capital Punishment laws to eliminate lethal injection and replace it with having the condemed man choosing between Electric Chair or Firing Squad. And the problem is..........?

    But ever the cunning linguist, Olby had this retort... "After a conversation with the person, Drake, 36, said he decided to file the bill. “There shouldn’t be anything controversial about a .45-caliber bullet. If it were up to me, we would just throw them off the Sunshine Skyway Bridge and be done with it.” You first, asshole.

    There it is — America 2011 — laws written by sociopaths like Brad Drake, inspired by blood thirsty goobers he met at the Waffle House!"

    Okay, you don't like the death penalty, that's fine. Bash the south, fine for a northern elitest asshole like you. BUT BASH WAFFLE HOUSE? ONE STEP TO FAR! where else can you get two chopped sirloins, hash browns, texas toast, salad for 7 bucks! Thems good eats!

    Maybe he'll post worsts tonight, maybe he won't. It's a mystery.

    cj, I was talking to wuss. I apologize if you thought it was directed at you.

    "Mr. Todd for supporting a bill to allow guns in bars. Then got arrested for DUI and having a gun in the car. GUNS ARE EVIL and THOSE WHO LOVE GUNS ARE EVIL!"

    .......unless you are the Attorney General that knew that guns were being sold to Mexican Drug Cartels to be used on US Borter agents, then it is hush hush for The False Murrow on this subject, but for Ollie North.....CRIMINAL!

    djthereplay, your argument on Palin doesn't fly. She is a very strong woman that doesn't look at the situation with her son as a "victim" like people on your side do. On your side, the easy way out is to abort, abort, abort. Your side has no clue what adversity means and how mentally strong a person can become when they face challenges. Your side demands nothing but Social and Economic Justice for people that constantly play the victim/sympathy card. Sorry, but if you cannot deal with a situation that is challenging, you take the easy way out.

    Look at the protests going on these days. You got a bunch of people in NYC the other day marching in front of Rupert Murdoch's home and shouting a bunch of crap, but they had to walk right past GEORGE SOROS'S penthouse......and not a word. These people are sheep that should be referred to as the "Something for Nothing" crowd.

    I am NOT a religious person, nor have I attended a Church service in a long time.......but I do know that one of the Commandments is "THOU SHALL NOT COVETH THY NEIGHBORS GOODS". I see a bunch of jealous people out there in the streets, demanding that these people give up their wealth involuntarily to them in the name of social & economic justice because they have been brainwashed to believe this crap that the Government controls everything. Why go to College? Why bother learning anything in school? Why work?

    I see libs posting all kinds of Marxist crap on Facebook all day long. The new meme is "We are against Corporate Greed, not against capitalism, yet tax the rich!". Sounds to me like they are coveting thy neighbors goods, which is $$$. My question is this............How much tax would be enough to satisfy this movement? 60%? 75%? 85%? 90%? 100%? The people on your side do not realize that if the taxes went up that high, companies will shut down for good. Owners of the companies will say, "ok Government, Fuck you, I'm outta here permanently".

    It has been over 1 month since this country had been downgraded, and this president doesn't care.

    djwolf76,

    Sure what I said about Palin will not fly to you, because you are too fixed on covering her tail instead of taking a look at her political and financially greedy attitude and actions.

    I`m sorry too, but everytime that you deal with a situation that is too challenging to you, You take the path of making a hard enough situation harder and worse. I`m not talking against those who are strong enough taking care of their chidren who they are bringing into the world, I`m talking about those who are TOO BIG of COWARDS to take care of the children whom they bring into the world.

    Yes, I see the protests. Just so I`m clear, Rupert Murdoch heads up these Fox News Channel CON Jobs, so He is the BIGGEST CON JOB of the group there.
    For the past going on 14 Years now, all I`ve seen is all kinds of greedy crap posted on youtube, and on my TV Screen saying " Give us your money and your votes in the name of freedom and the moral values of America " because some of us have been brainwashed to believe that these Pick and Choose Corporate Christians are gonna
    " bring us closer to God, because The Government is separating us from God ". By the poorer not having anything and having to make it on their OWN?
    Like God is gonna come down in the flesh with a bag of money in it?
    Do you really think that is gonna happen?
    If that's the case, why don`t these Pick and Choose Corporate Christians make a boulevards to where we could each have our OWN Money Printing and Pressing Factories in our OWN spaces WITHOUT ending up possibily being charged with
    PAYING COUNTERFEIT MONEY?

    And YOU act like the rich don`t have ANYTHING to share, to where it has become SO wrong to put some spending money into the hands of their companies' potential consumers who are US the American Citizens and Taxpayers.

    Yes, Those people who are protesting on Wall Street, they ARE people who are college students and workers trying to make something good of their lives giving into something and getting a whole bunch of nothing in the name of
    " Freedom and The Big Banks on Wall Street being the Job Creators ".
    The BIG Banks on Wall Street have beome more of The CON Job Creators. " We will give you a point system, if you give us your money. " THAT, and Those people had to bail THOSE WALL STREET CONS out in the first place, in the name of " These Wall Street Banks are the Job Creators. The Wall Street Bankers are the Jews ".

    GIVE ME A BREAK !!!!! THIS IS THE BIGGEST CON JOB I`VE EVER HEARD OR SEEN IN MY LIFE !!!! SCAM !!!, ABSOLUTE SCAM !!!

    Where are Those Protesters' Financial Bailouts' to avoid falling into a life of NOTHING at?

    THOSE PEOPLE NEVER COVETED WALL STREET's GOOD, IT's WALL STREET COVETING THE CONSUMERS' GOODS !!!

    " Why go to College? Why bother learning anything in school?
    Why work? "
    That's is the BIGGEST ILLUSION ON EARTH !!!!
    To answer that illusion though, Maybe because some of us don`t want our taxpayer dollars and cents to actually go into bettering up the quality of the infostructure of our nation's educational system(s),
    or the materials and money needed to produce the jobs to produce the products for their consumers to buy into.

    If NO Money goes into that, they are going to think about, let's create Our American Jobs in another country where OUR PRODUCT WILL BE MORE PHYSICALLY AND FINANCIALLY APPRECIATED !!!

    - Dwight



    Like when you got a itch you can't scratch... IT'S THE WPITWA!

    Bronze:Dr. Garrett D. Hinshaw, president of Catawba Valley Community College in North Carolina for banning a student who was against his Student ID card to be used as a debit card to gain his grant money. It seems that said student's info was sold to a number of outfits garnering him a lot of spam. When he complained, Dr. Hinshaw banned him from campus for two semesters.

    This time, got to agree. Student had a problem and has a right to air it. But with Olby, there is always something missing.

    Silver:Republican Congressman Joe Walsh of Illinois For something about not paying child support. Olby automatically takes ex-wife's position. As before, more to the story, but Olby isn't talking.

    GOLD!!!:Florida State Republican Representative Brad Drake for his second consecutive win as WPITW! Basically it's a rehash of last night's screed. But mr. Drake gets the award for the famous line "Frankly my dear, I don't give a damn!" coming from Humpry Bogart.

    Olby put him up there for making a mistake. GREAT JOURNALISM!

    Long day, no nap after dialysis, turn on John Gibson and go to sleep. See you later.

    Financially "Greedy" attitude and actions? Are you freaking kidding me? Tell that to Bill Clinton when he makes speeches for 1 to 3 million dollars a speech. Tell that to Obama that just collected 70 freaking million dollars in campaign donations. And you have the gall to say nothing about Democrats' greed? Hello......Nancy Pelosi? Charlie Rangel? Jeffrey Immelt?

    djthereplay, since when did YOU have the authority to decide who is greedy and who is not? To me, you are just jealous because some people out in the world are successful, and you must not be successful so you attack others for being "greedy" as you see it. All you want is THEIR money. You COVET their money. You will do EVERYTHING you can to make sure that their wealth is taken away from them so you can have it.

    Nancy Pelosi is reportedly worth 35.5 million and allowed her family to be shuttled around on a jet reserved for the Speaker of the House.

    Charlie Rangel doesn't pay his taxes.

    Jeffrey Immelt is CEO of a company that moves American job overseas to maximize profit and not pay taxes. Olbermann used to work for him.

    (Sidenote: I'm still waiting for MKDAWUSS to provide me with the transcript where Mr. Asks the Questions Regardless of Who's Being Asked took his old boss to school for his business methods)

    Who else?

    John "Golddigger" Kerry moved his boat to my state so he didn't have to pay taxes on it.

    Michael Moore rails on capitalism then sues the Weinstein Brothers for unpaid profits.

    Al Gore does more to wreck the planet than I ever could and has made millions doing it.

    (Another sidenote: I'm still waiting for MKDAWUSS to provide me with the transcript where Mr. Asks the Questions Regardless of Who's Being Asked took his current boss to school for his business methods and global warming hypocrisy)

    Ted Kennedy got drunk and partied with a woman that wasn't his wife, drove off a bridge, let Mary Jo drown, went to a hotel to sleep it off, called his crew to discuss the best possible excuse, and only went to the police AFTER they traced the car and the dead body to him.

    Huh? That last one has nothing to do with far left greed? Good point.

    Anyway, I don't think greed is a problem exclusive to conservatives. Just sayin'.

    Time for another lesson!

    I also saw something here about Bill O'Reilly inciting Scott Roeder to murder despite the fact that Roeder had been wanting to kill Tiller three years before The O'Reilly Factor debuted.

    Fine. I'll go with it. I say we expel O'Reilly to Jupiter.

    That also means that we have to get rid of a few other people and items that incite people to violence.

    With that said Jodie Foster must be exiled as well. John Hinckley Jr. would never have shot Ronald Reagan if he wasn't trying to impress her.

    Also, we should remove all the writings of J.D. Salinger and place them in the shuttle. This should avoid incidents similar to what happened to John Lennon.

    Lastly, Al Gore, his views of global warming, the film An Inconvenient Truth and all those associated with it must be removed from the planet immediately. This will avoid any further acts of violence that will bring harm to others as James L. Lee did when he held people hostage at Discovery Channel HQ.

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38957020/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/t/police-kill-discovery-building-gunman/#.TphjeK79VU0

    "Lee said at the time that he experienced an ‘‘awakening” when he watched former Vice President Al Gore’s environmental documentary 'An Inconvenient Truth.'"

    While there's no link between Roeder and O'Reilly, there is one between Gore and Lee.

    I think it's safe to assume that, if O'Reilly can (allegedly) incite someone to murder without even a remote connection between the two, then Al Gore owes a big goddamn apology to the Discovery Channel and the people Lee took hostage.

    Therefore, it's in the best interest of the country that Bill O'Reilly and Al Gore be removed from our culture immediately.

    I'm sure Dwight, who abhors such behavior, will agree with this. I know MKDAWUSS doesn't because that means Olbermann works for a man who incites people to violence. And since he didn't call him out on it that makes Olbermann the magic word that starts with H.

    By the way, where is MKDAWUSS?

    Taking a break after that embarrassing "charity chart" debacle Carlos?

    I would too. Maybe next time you'll think twice (or at least watch the damn video) before writing s*** like your last post.

    Looks like in djtherapy, we have another person who ignores far more than he addresses.

    Obviously, this website must be having an effect holding Olberdork accountable. Why else would Carlos and other liberals come out of the woodwork to post here?

    "Obviously, this website must be having an effect holding Olberdork accountable. Why else would Carlos and other liberals come out of the woodwork to post here?"

    I wouldn't say they're coming out of the woodwork.

    However, those who come to defend him are not of the highest level of immaturity and intelligence. It's true. Look at this thread. One guy says it's ok to insult people whom he feels deserves it, the other was too damn lazy to research his own argument. And when I say "research" I mean click on the link and watch the damn video.

    Everyone of these political commentators attracts different type of people. Olbermann attracts people that think screaming, name calling and 50 cent words are a method of speaking "truth to power."

    And once again DJTheReplay and I are expected to comment while we're not here, in which we are accused of dodging questions and ignoring issues, a common activity of the rest of you all.

    "turn on John Gibson and go to sleep"

    Does he still have a radio show? Or an audience for that matter? He's somebody who kinda vanished from the public light after Comcast fired Olbermann from MSNBC and Gibson couldn't come up with fresh material to smear Olby with (or did he get it from OlbyWatch, I don't know...). I mean, this is the guy who was fired from MSNBC for spending too much time in a bathtub and built his career around attacking Keith Olbermann.

    "Anyway, I don't think greed is a problem exclusive to conservatives. Just sayin'."

    Oh goody, we can play the "both sides do it" card that I apparently wasn't allowed to play when pointing out the double-standards that Olbermann calls out, and the double-standards that OlbermannWatch has and often ignores. You all condemn the likes of Soros George, Nancy Pelosi, Jeff Immelt and Warren Buffett for having too much money and say nothing about the likes of Rupert Murdoch and the Koch Brothers.


    "Everyone of these political commentators attracts different type of people."

    Wow, we agree! I'm sure Olbermann would too if you were to ask him that.

    Let's revisit the latest O'Reilly attack from Wednesday night via the transcript:
    "First, the 'Worsts.' I had a lovely conversation with them. Then, Tavis Smiley and Cornel West carved Bill O'Reilly into tiny little bite-sized Bill O. snacks last night. Highlights ahead on 'Countdown.' ... The bronze to Bill O. the clown. Remember last Friday when I interviewed Tavis Smiley and Dr. Cornel West at Occupy LA? That went well. Apparently, Bill decided to steal the idea and invite them both on his show. Big mistake. (Chopped up clip montage shown.) Psychopath with a comb-over. The wake for Mr. O'Reilly's credibility will be at 7:00 P.M. tomorrow evening. Please bring Handi Wipes so we can clean it off the walls."
    I'm sorry, but whose credibility died? Olbermoronn's credibility has been gone for so long, it's zombified.
    Meanwhile, on an actual cable news channel (unlike the channel Keithy pretends is a news channel): Body Language of Holder testimony in May, O'Reilly on "The Daily Show," and one in-context clip from the Smiley/West shootout
    Dennis Miller on the Occupiers, Herman Cain, Smiley and West, and Hank Williams' shot at "Fox & Friends"

    What the hell is with your incoherent yammering about Wuss? If you listened to John Gibson (everytime I listen to him he tells the story about his time at M.S.S.R. (MSNBC), BTB, and BOTH of their firings) you should know the synopsis of their history together by now. Also, you champion the fact that these protesters go and shout stuff right in front of Rupert Murdoch's home, but totally ignore that these protesters WALKED RIGHT IN FRONT OF GEORGE SOROS'S HOUSE AND NOT A PEEP WAS SHOUTED by the protesters in utter disgust of his "greed of $$$ (BY the way, how many times has Soros been inside the Obama White House?????)

    John Gibson is still on the air, weekdays from noon to 3:00 Eastern (and at other times in syndication). I'm subscribed to the Fox News Radio YouTube channel and they post a video each day where John, his husband-and-wife producers, or all three, tease that day's topics. Here's today's video.

    "And once again DJTheReplay and I are expected to comment while we're not here, in which we are accused of dodging questions and ignoring issues, a common activity of the rest of you all."

    Oh spare us the "we're not here" crap. The reason you get accused of dodging questions and ignoring issues is because you do.

    But let's go with your theory for a second. Even when you are here you take to selective editing to avoid things that are inconvenient to your hero worship. You're doing it right now!

    And as for Dwight, he's checked in every day since he started last week. It's all there for him to read. And he's skipped over a lot of stuff that's also inconvenient to his hero worship.

    "Does he still have a radio show? Or an audience for that matter? He's somebody who kinda vanished from the public light after Comcast fired Olbermann from MSNBC and Gibson couldn't come up with fresh material to smear Olby with (or did he get it from OlbyWatch, I don't know...). I mean, this is the guy who was fired from MSNBC for spending too much time in a bathtub and built his career around attacking Keith Olbermann."

    Are you kidding? Get it through your head: OLBERMANN was fired from MSNBC in the 90's, NOT GIBSON, because he couldn't keep his objectivity in check during the Lewinsky scandal. BY OLBERMANN'S OWN ADMISSION HE DIDN'T WANT TO DO HIS JOB. WHAT PART OF THIS ISN'T CLEAR? IS OLBERMANN SMEARING HIMSELF? IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE SAYING?

    You so sure Gibson's full of s*** and you're so sure Olbermann is being "smeared" but you can't even get the story right.

    And you wonder why we call you a liar.

    "Oh goody, we can play the "both sides do it" card that I apparently wasn't allowed to play when pointing out the double-standards that Olbermann calls out, and the double-standards that OlbermannWatch has and often ignores. You all condemn the likes of Soros George, Nancy Pelosi, Jeff Immelt and Warren Buffett for having too much money and say nothing about the likes of Rupert Murdoch and the Koch Brothers."

    You know why that is? BECAUSE MURDOCH ISN'T GOING AROUND SAYING "WE SHOULD SPREAD THE WEALTH!!!"

    MICHAEL MOORE GOES AROUND SAYING "CAPITALISM SUCKS" WHILE HE SUES FOR MORE MONEY!

    THE DEMOCRATS TALK ABOUT PAYINGMORE TAXES WHILE SOME OF THEM DON'T PAY ANY TO BEGIN WITH!

    AND ALL KEITH OLBERMANN TALKS ABOUT IS HOW EVIL THE REPUBLICANS ARE WHEN THE DEMOCRATS ARE JUST AS BAD IF NOT WORSE!

    WHEN RUPERT MURDOCH STARTS TALKING ABOUT PAYING MORE TAXES AND HE DOESN'T THEN YOU HAVE A POINT!

    WHEN BILL O'REILLY STARTS SLANTING HIS COVERAGE HARD RIGHT WITH LIES AND INSULTS THEN YOU HAVE A POINT!

    AGAIN, WHAT PART OF THESE COMMENTS ARE NOT CLEAR?

    "Wow, we agree! I'm sure Olbermann would too if you were to ask him that."

    We agree on a lot of things Carlos. You're just too busy pretending to be an "independent moderate" and too busy covering Olbermann's ass to notice.

    "You all condemn the likes of Soros George, Nancy Pelosi, Jeff Immelt and Warren Buffett for having too much money and say nothing about the likes of Rupert Murdoch and the Koch Brothers."

    There you go with this "you all" bullshit again when you're directly challenging a comment I MADE. What the fuck do my comments have to do with everyone else Carlos? Are you that soft you can't even challenge me when we live 900 miles apart?

    Look at what you've done. I mention a few wealthy liberals and their hypocrisy and what do you say? "You're condemning these liberals for having too much money."

    When did I condemn George Soros for having too much money? NEVER. I don't like the fact that he uses it to buy what he wants, which is what YOU claim to despise.

    When did I condemn Nancy Pelosi for having too much money? NEVER. I just pointed out her wealth. And the fact that, despite being filthy rich, used taxpayer dollars to shuttle her family around when she was Speaker.

    When did I condemn Jeffrey Immelt for having too much money? NEVER. I CONDEMNED HIM FOR SHIPPING JOBS THIS COUNTRY NEEDS OVERSEAS TO MAXIMIZE GE PROFITS. I don't even know if he's rich! He probably is, but I'm talking about his company, not his own worth! Do you not understand the difference?

    When did I condemn Warren Buffett for having too much money? NEVER. Hell, when have I ever mentioned Warren Buffett?

    WHEN DID I EVER CONDEMN ANYONE FOR HAVING TOO MUCH MONEY? NEVER. BECAUSE I'M NOT AN EPIC FAIL LIKE YOU CRYING ABOUT NOT BEING AS SUCCESSFUL AS I WANT TO BE.

    "Oh goody, we can play the "both sides do it" card that I apparently wasn't allowed to play when pointing out the double-standards that Olbermann calls out, and the double-standards that OlbermannWatch has and often ignores."

    You literally just wrote a bunch of crap that never happened to prove a point about double standards that don't exist. You talk like he's a man of the people but all he ever does is show one side of the argument! And you know this!

    You've proven yet again that you can't even grasp the simplest of arguments.

    What drives you to embarrass yourself like this MKDAWUSS? Love of Olbermann or hatred of Olbermann Watch?

    "And once again DJTheReplay and I are expected to comment while we're not here, in which we are accused of dodging questions and ignoring issues, a common activity of the rest of you all."-MKDAWUSS

    Time stamp on that was 6:34 p.m. Eastern Time.

    These were comments I, cjflan32, made between 12:30 p.m. and 1:14 p.m. Eastern Time:

    "(Sidenote: I'm still waiting for MKDAWUSS to provide me with the transcript where Mr. Asks the Questions Regardless of Who's Being Asked took his old boss to school for his business methods)"

    "(Another sidenote: I'm still waiting for MKDAWUSS to provide me with the transcript where Mr. Asks the Questions Regardless of Who's Being Asked took his current boss to school for his business methods and global warming hypocrisy)"

    "Taking a break after that embarrassing "charity chart" debacle Carlos?"

    You'll note that the first two sentences I cited came in the same comment where MKDAWUSS pulled out the following:

    "Anyway, I don't think greed is a problem exclusive to conservatives. Just sayin'."

    Nevermind the fact that he took that quote out of context to create an argument where I complain that liberals make too much money, making MKDAWUSS either a liar or an idiot YET AGAIN, he literally said "And once again...we are accused of dodging questions and ignoring issues" and what does he do?

    Dodge questions and ignore issues.

    Good Lord. I was referring to "greed" as Dwight and djwolf described it. I suppose I could've put the word in quotations but MKDAWUSS still would've found a way to screw it up. Next time I'll make sure I clarify for the Olbermann-impaired.

    In any event, it doesn't change the fact that I've never ripped someone for having too much money. And if by some stretch of MKDAWUSS' imagination I'm lying the burden of proof falls on him. And we all know "proof" and "MKDAWUSS" are oxymorons.

    Here's a better example of what I'm talking about. Honestly, when I read MKDAWUSS' response to this I threw my face in my palm and nodded in the form of "Wow, this guy's a f****** moron":

    "Jeffrey Immelt is CEO of a company that moves American job overseas to maximize profit and not pay taxes. Olbermann used to work for him."-cjflan32

    "You all condemn the likes of...Jeff Immelt...for having too much money..."-MKDAWUSS

    What does Jeffrey Immelt's independent wealth have to do with him moving jobs overseas and GE not paying any taxes? Are you implying that Immelt OWNS General Electric and therefore OWNS all the money GE makes?

    Or was it just the case of you not thinking before typing again?

    All I've ever asked about Immelt is why he's advising POTUS on job creation and why Keith "asking the questions regardless of who's being asked" Olbermann won't challenge him on GE's lack of tax payments.

    This must be the fifth or sixth time I've asked you about this. Are you gonna use the "WAAA! 'You all' better stop accusing me of dodging questions and ignoring issues or I'll tell my mommy" again?

    Sorry people, I have to clarify one more thing before MKDAWUSS makes a fool of himself again.

    "Does he still have a radio show? Or an audience for that matter? He's somebody who kinda vanished from the public light after Comcast fired Olbermann from MSNBC and Gibson couldn't come up with fresh material to smear Olby with (or did he get it from OlbyWatch, I don't know...). I mean, this is the guy who was fired from MSNBC for spending too much time in a bathtub and built his career around attacking Keith Olbermann."

    I don't recall the reason why, but John Gibson did leave MSNBC in 2000. I'm pretty sure he was fired.

    My point is he wasn't fired in 1998 for sitting in a bathtub as MKDAWUSS has just claimed. Olbermann was canned in 1998. I truly don't know if Olbermann literally sat in his bathtub. Quite frankly, I don't want to know.

    But there's no disputing that, during the Lewinsky Scandal, Olbermann refused to do his job and Gibson had to fill in for him. Not even a question.

    Honestly Carlos, how the hell could you have screwed up that story? I would attribute it to an honest mistake but you've shown "you all" time and again you do a poor job comprehending things I'm not really sure.

    "And once again DJTheReplay and I are expected to comment while we're not here, in which we are accused of dodging questions and ignoring issues, a common activity of the rest of you all."

    WUSS, listen very carefully...when you use the time that you *ARE HERE* to comment on some off-hand comment about John Gibson that has nothing to do with anything, despite the fact that A. there are far more significant criticisms of OLBERMANN here on OLBERMANN Watch, and B. there are DIRECT challenges to YOU regarding your defenses of Olbermann and attacks of others---when that happens, it is absolutely fair to say that you are "dodging questions and ignoring issues."

    And in Olbermann's world, silence is consent.

    Hello all !,

    Firstly, mkdawuss and I will post on here when we are good and ready to.

    Secondly, Does anybody know how to do a little something called
    "reading between the lines" ? All that mkdawuss is trying to say that he doesn`t necessarily condone the swearing, and do you not understand what I was trying to say when I said that " We are living in Subhuman times in our politics " as well?
    Let me clarify myself to bring it home.
    We are living in a time where some of us are having to get a little subhuman to solve our nation's subhuman
    problems brought about by Some of Our Politicians' subhuman attitudes. When are you all at OlbermannWatch will take a better look at WHY Keith Olbermann talks the way he does on occasion in this subhuman era?

    You're right, mkdawuss. Greed is not a problem exclusive to conservatives, but I have been seeing the EXTREME Right Wing Corporate Christian Conservatives cause the worst acts of it.
    The Moderates? They at least have a line that they will not cross.
    At least Most Moderates have a heart for someone beyond themselves, and they won`t be using faith and American Values to bride and scam people out of what they have.
    Would I EVER like to get back to those times.


    By the way, you all have been answering mkdawuss' and my posts with a bunch of mess, while saying that we have not been addressing your posts.
    mkdawuss just CORRECTLY Stated how you all LOVE to bash those the likes of Warren Buffett, Nanci Pelosi
    Firstly, What's the problem with these TRUE Public Serving Warriors?, The Fact that they are willing to take the time out of their lives to contribute some of their financial resources and efforts to us, the citizens and taxpayers and consumers of this country who elect them to the office(s) that they are in and making sure we are allowed to have something to share as well?

    You all need to be thanking heaven for these openhearted warriors. We should be making statues in honor of these warriors, but that's all too openhearted for you all, is it?

    Secondly, How many times and how many variations do I have to use in preaching about how in order for anything good to get done in Congress, The Bill MUST Pass BOTH HOUSES of Congress before the bill reaches the President`s Desk and it is signed into law?
    How many times do I have to inform you that all of this requires NO FILIBUSTERS FROM THE MINORITY PARTY IN THE SENATE, OR ANY OTHER ACT TO BLOCK THE BILL FROM BEING DEBATED OVER OR BEING PASSED? DO I HAVE TO TEACH YOU ALL OVER AGAIN HOW A BILL BECOMES A LAW?
    By the way, At least Warren Buffett is brave enough to grow a heart and contribute a little bit of his dollars back to OUR nation that helped him get where he is at today.
    ... At least Warren Buffett is a Billionaire, or Millionaire who is showing us how NOT to be a CON Artist who will neglect his country because he's rich and wealthy.

    Really that's all I want out of someone who will come on My TV Screen or whatever and try to bribe a vote or whatever out of me, trying to become a politician in authority.

    Plain and Simple. Take it to Wall Street AND Capital Hill
    and C-Street ... " GIVE or DON`T ASK and DON`T BRIBE "

    I HATE BEING BRIBED FOR NOTHING !!!!!

    - Dwight


    “Firstly, mkdawuss and I will post on here when we are good and ready to.”

    Well, WUSS has been getting ready for a long time now. It’s been months (maybe years) since he’s addressed certain issues. And I’m still waiting for a response to my posts to YOU. Whenever you’re ready…

    “Secondly, Does anybody know how to do a little something called
    "reading between the lines" ?”

    First of all, which post are you referring to; because WUSS isn’t smart enough to make such layered comments? But typical you would suggest we must read between the lines when something just isn’t there. It’s like when the Left can’t find racism so they start screaming about “code language.”

    “All that mkdawuss is trying to say that he doesn`t necessarily condone the swearing, “

    AGAIN, it’s not all about language; it’s about LIES and logical FALLACIES and SLANDER.

    “We are living in a time where some of us are having to get a little subhuman to solve our nation's subhuman
    problems brought about by Some of Our Politicians' subhuman attitudes. When are you all at OlbermannWatch will take a better look at WHY Keith Olbermann talks the way he does on occasion in this subhuman era?”

    He does it because he is the worst kind of political HACK, attacking ONLY those who don’t think like he and, therefore, YOU do. By the way, your strategy flies right in the face of such greats as Martin Luther King and Gandhi.

    And the only subhuman behavior I see is at the Occupy Wall Street cesspool.

    “You're right, mkdawuss. Greed is not a problem exclusive to conservatives”

    WUSS didn’t make that point and he never would.

    “but I have been seeing the EXTREME Right Wing Corporate Christian Conservatives cause the worst acts of it.
    The Moderates? They at least have a line that they will not cross.
    At least Most Moderates have a heart for someone beyond themselves, and they won`t be using faith and American Values to bride and scam people out of what they have.
    Would I EVER like to get back to those times.”

    Here again you attribute DIFFERENCES OF OPINION on how to solve our nation’s problems with heartlessness and general bad faith. You talk about hearts and minds quite a lot; do you know the hearts and minds of the people you attack? Share with us how you know these people’s motivations? And when exactly were these times you speak of?

    “By the way, you all have been answering mkdawuss' and my posts with a bunch of mess, while saying that we have not been addressing your posts.”

    How about you explain to us HOW it is “mess”? And FYI, I have only been addressed by you ONCE; and even then, not thoroughly and not even close to efficiently.

    “mkdawuss just CORRECTLY Stated how you all LOVE to bash those the likes of Warren Buffett, Nanci Pelosi”

    Who "bashed" them? And who is this “you all;” I never mentioned them.

    “Firstly, What's the problem with these TRUE Public Serving Warriors?, The Fact that they are willing to take the time out of their lives to contribute some of their financial resources and efforts to us, the citizens and taxpayers and consumers of this country who elect them to the office(s) that they are in and making sure we are allowed to have something to share as well?”

    What part of, “There are not enough rich people to get us out of all of our nation’s problems” do you not understand? Why does the fact that Obama has received RECORD campaign donations from Wall Street not seem to bother you? Why is it only the “CONservatives” that you want to complain about?

    “You all need to be thanking heaven for these openhearted warriors.”

    I thank Heaven every day we have the likes of Nancy Pelosi to tell us we have to pass bills in order to see what’s in them?

    “Secondly, How many times and how many variations do I have to use in preaching about how in order for anything good to get done in Congress, The Bill MUST Pass BOTH HOUSES of Congress before the bill reaches the President`s Desk and it is signed into law?
    How many times do I have to inform you that all of this requires NO FILIBUSTERS FROM THE MINORITY PARTY IN THE SENATE, OR ANY OTHER ACT TO BLOCK THE BILL FROM BEING DEBATED OVER OR BEING PASSED? DO I HAVE TO TEACH YOU ALL OVER AGAIN HOW A BILL BECOMES A LAW?”

    I don’t even know what you’re talking about but it seems like you’re suggesting that if Republicans block something that they don’t agree with that it is obvious that they are just against fixing our nation’s problems. You definitely are a hyper-partisan.

    “By the way, At least Warren Buffett is brave enough to grow a heart and contribute a little bit of his dollars back to OUR nation that helped him get where he is at today.
    ... At least Warren Buffett is a Billionaire, or Millionaire who is showing us how NOT to be a CON Artist who will neglect his country because he's rich and wealthy.”

    Yeah, that’s why he evades his taxes. Real smart to prop HIM up like that! How do we know that everyone who wants higher taxes doesn’t do that very same thing? After all, every time it is suggested that they pay more in taxes of their own accord, they say that they are not willing.

    “Plain and Simple. Take it to Wall Street AND Capital Hill
    and C-Street ... " GIVE or DON`T ASK and DON`T BRIBE "”

    So unless they give enough of THEIR money that THEY earned as you see fit, they should not even be allowed to ASK for money so that people can WILLINGLY donate it to them?

    “I HATE BEING BRIBED FOR NOTHING !!!!!”

    Luckily you don’t HAVE to give in to the bribe.

    Get a grip!

    "WUSS, listen very carefully...when you use the time that you *ARE HERE* to comment on some off-hand comment about John Gibson that has nothing to do with anything, despite the fact that A. there are far more significant criticisms of OLBERMANN here on OLBERMANN Watch, and B. there are DIRECT challenges to YOU regarding your defenses of Olbermann and attacks of others---when that happens, it is absolutely fair to say that you are 'dodging questions and ignoring issues.'

    And in Olbermann's world, silence is consent."

    Huh. Wish I thought of that last night.

    Anyway, yeah, silence is consent on OlbyPlanet. Said it when he verbally abused Scott Brown if I recall.

    The funny thing about MKDAWUSS' argument is he's always around to comment when he sees something he doesn't like or when I call him out for something out of the blue but when s*** hits the fan like it did with this charity argument MKDAWUSS is all of a sudden not here.

    So let's review. MKDAWUSS made seven posts this week.

    One was to cover Olbermann's ass for being a hypocrite about the Tea Party while taking a few pot shots that made him look like a fool.

    One was to brag that Olbermann gave 25 times more to charity in one month two years ago.

    One was to complain the word "hypocrisy" gets used too much, which is gonna happen when your name is Carlos Hypocrite Lejjena.

    One was to complain that he was being "attacked" because we use his own words against him.

    One was to say that I proved Dwight's point. No substance whatsoever.

    One was to prove to everyone he had no idea what he was talking about when he brought up that Olbermann gave 25 times more to charity in one month two years ago.

    One was to complain that he wasn't here to answer the challenges of Olbermann Watch, take a shot at John Gibson he COMPLETELY SCREWED UP, and take my arguments completely out of context to create double standards that, at the very least when it comes to me, do not exist.

    In short, Carlos spent more time cherry picking quotes, taking shots at John Gibson, completely misconstruing that charity bit and making comments about hypocrisy directed at me that don't exist.

    So basically, lying, getting things wrong, etc., it was just another week for MKDAWUSS.

    You know, isn't about time you guys ignored the blithering idiots Wuss and his friend? They are here simply to disrupt the board, like little children, seeking attention. Ignore them and they will go away.

    Any word from Olberdork yet on King Obama sending troops into Africa without Congressional approval? No? Didn't think so. Only Republican presidents can be attacked for that.

    Poor MKDAWUSS, now he has this Dwight character pulling him in the mud with him.

    You're really gonna let this guy speak for you?

    This guy, who says he "LOVES IT" when people he doesn't like get smeared?

    This guy, who says we have to get "subhuman" to deal with our problems?

    This guy, who thinks everyone right of center is evil?

    I know you don't stand for those things, I know it.

    It's a yes or no question. No b.s. this time. Don't bother with any lines like "you all speak for each other" because I'M TALKING TO YOU, NOT ANYONE ELSE. And you know I speak only for myself.

    Yes or no Carlos. Y'know, if you're "around."

    Now for Dwight.

    "Firstly, mkdawuss and I will post on here when we are good and ready to."

    Well that's fair enough. No one can be here 24/7.

    But, and I'm just spitballing here, when someone says something like "Hey Dwight? How come O'Reilly, despite no evidence, is an accessory to Tiller's murder but Al Gore, despite evidence, isn't an accessory to kidnapping and mayhem?" maybe, just maybe, you want to give it a second look. Because when you don't it looks like you're, what's the phrase, "dodging questions and ignoring comments."

    "Secondly, Does anybody know how to do a little something called "reading between the lines" ?"

    Sorry Dwight, but the truth is neither one of you has shown you're doing that.

    First off, MKDAWUSS is on record saying he openly condemns anything he defines as "classless and offensive."

    http://www.olbermannwatch.com/archives/2011/07/keith_olbermann_125.php#comments

    "He does criticize people, sure. When he does, it's a legitimate criticism and he puts substance behind it, starting with said individual's own words and actions. Rarely does he head into classless and offensive territory, and when he does I point it out."

    There are several examples in that link alone that normal people would consider "classless and offensive" that MKDAWUSS did not condemn. Guess you didn't "catch" that. Or perhaps he just "wasn't around." Maybe you should do a little research before you stick up for someone like that.

    As it pertains to you, well, I'm sorry, but between your poorly written sentences, horrible spelling (both of which Olbemann has claimed makes you stupid), continued immature use of the phrase "CONServatives," absolute partisanship and saying things like “You're right, mkdawuss. Greed is not a problem exclusive to conservatives” which didn't happen, you've shown us nothing that says you're saying things "between the lines." You're comments are pretty straightforward and you've said nothing to clarify comments such as how much you "LOVE IT" when Olbermann insults a conservative.

    BTW, here's the link regarding what Olbermann thinks about bad grammar and spelling:

    http://www.olbermannwatch.com/archives/2010/08/new_frontiers_i.php

    All the links are there so don't play the "that's a Johnny Dollar link" card because the best way to get yourself banned is to call Johnny Dollar a liar without evidence.

    "You know, isn't about time you guys ignored the blithering idiots Wuss and his friend? They are here simply to disrupt the board, like little children, seeking attention. Ignore them and they will go away."

    No, they won't. They'll keep coming here for the reasons you just posted.

    But I see your point. After all this time MKDAWUSS either doesn't get it or doesn't want to get it and the Mousketeer, well, figure it out yourself:

    http://www.myspace.com/djthereplay

    "Any word from Olberdork yet on King Obama sending troops into Africa without Congressional approval? No? Didn't think so. Only Republican presidents can be attacked for that."

    And MKDAWUSS wonders why the word "hypocrite" is tossed around.

    If we had no business in Iraq, what the hell are we doing in Africa?

    “mkdawuss just CORRECTLY Stated how you all LOVE to bash those the likes of Warren Buffett, Nanci Pelosi”

    NO. HE. DIDN'T. HE WENT AFTER ME FOR SAYING THEY MAKE TOO MUCH MONEY, WHICH DIDN'T HAPPEN. ALL I DID WAS REPORT PELOSI'S NET WORTH.

    THAT'S NOT "BASHING" PELOSI FOR MAKING TOO MUCH MONEY. THAT'S CARLOS PROJECTING HIS JEALOUSY.

    AND THE FIRST PERSON TO MENTION WARREN BUFFETT IN THIS THREAD WAS...YOU GUESSED IT...MKDAWUSS!

    AND DON'T EVEN PRETEND YOU'VE GONE IN THE ARCHIVE TO CONFIRM WHAT YOU'VE SAID IS TRUE. YOU HAVEN'T. YOU'VE BEEN HERE A WEEK AND PROVEN MULTIPLE TIMES YOU'RE A LYING HATE MONGER WITH COMPREHENSION ISSUES. I SERIOUSLY DOUBT YOU SPENT ANY TIME SEEING IF "YOU ALL" SPEND THEIR TIME BASHING PELOSI AND BUFFETT.

    YOU GUYS REALLY WANT TO SUPPORT OLBERMANN?

    THIS ADVICE MR. STEWART, MR. LEJJENA: SHUT. THE. HELL. UP.

    Ok, @get_a_grip,

    Since you can`t understand what I am trying to say, let me put it to you in other terms that you can`t see, or that you all FAIL to figure out.

    Do you know why I said " I love it when Keith Olbermann curses these CONS out ", or something along those lines ?
    Because, as much as Keith's mouth gets subhuman on occasion,
    HIS MOUTH IS DEFENDING THE VERY THINGS THAT ARE KEEPING ME AFLOAT IN MY LIFE THAT THESE CONS IN CONGRESS ARE TRYING TO ULTAMITLY TAKE AWAY FROM ME THROUGH THEIR FINANCIAL NEGLECT OF US (THEIR CITIZENS), and 2 HOLY WARS, etc. AND WILL STOP AT NOTHING TO DO SO. THAT IS SUBHUMANITY TO ME ALSO.
    A STRONG SUBHUMAN ACT LIKE THAT ENDS UP GETTING AN EQUAL SUBHUMAN RESPONSE IN THE END in my view.
    Maybe if I saw a better way to talk these CONS in CONGRESS into NOT ACTING LIKE CONS, and START ACTING LIKE TRUE PUBLIC SERVING WARRIORS, Maybe I`d understand a little better about your citicisms on Keith Olbermann's swearing,
    KEYWORDS BEING (KEITH OLBERMANN'S SWEARING).

    This "it's not all about the language, it's about LIES and logical FALLACIES and SLANDER " thing is talk partially,

    If the language didn`t matter to you as much, Why is it that
    you used mkdawuss' FEW critisms against Keith Olbermann for his swearing, and (ONLY KEITH OLBERMANN'S SWEARING) against me?

    BECAUSE, I SAID WHAT I SAID, THE WAY I SAID IT IN A PREVIOUS POST OUT OF FRUSTRATION AGAINST THOSE WHOM KEITH OLBERMANN'S MOUTH IS TRYING TO TALK SOME SENSE INTO?

    Yes, The language matters to you as much as what you all like to call the " LIES and logical FALLACIES and SLANDER ".

    Y'all`s whole " Warren Buffett evades his taxes " thing, is called you are not wanting to except his contributions.
    You don`t actually want him to pay very much in taxes.

    It's amazing that you all want to call mkdawuss and me out for lying, getting things wrong, smearing, no substance, etc. AND, @cjflan32 has the nerve to call mkdawuss a WUSS.

    THIS IS WEAK !!!!

    - Dwight


    Before someone responds to djthereplay's latest post, I want to get in on the act. Before I begin, I want to say that cjflan32 and others and done a good job of responding to him along with mkdawuss, but there is one element of it that is missing that I hope to fill. With that said, ...

    djthereplay,

    In your recent post that appears above this one, you responded to get_a_grip's post that appeared on on October 15, 2011 7:55 AM. My response to you is not in regard to what you said above, but in response to what get_a_grip wrote in that post that you DIDN"T respond to. Since you didn't respond to each of the following, then I'm going to put words in your mouth to indicate what your implied response is, but since you didn't actually write them, then they will be without quotation marks. Only by you giving an actual response to each of the following indicating otherwise will it indicate that the words that I'm about to attribute to you does not reflect your views.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    from get_a_grip's post:

    1) djthereplay: “You're right, mkdawuss. Greed is not a problem exclusive to conservatives”

    get_a_grip: "WUSS didn’t make that point and he never would."

    djthereplay: You are right, get_a_grip, mkdawuss didn't say that, instead it was cjflan32 who wrote it on October 14, 2011 12:30 PM, the exact quote being:

    "Anyway, I don't think greed is a problem exclusive to conservatives. Just sayin'."

    However, since I don't like him and mkdawuss is the only one on here that I like, I wanted to give him the credit instead. But since I've been caught, I now apologize and concede that cjflan32 was the one who made that statement and is exactly correct on that point.


    2) djthereplay: “but I have been seeing the EXTREME Right Wing Corporate Christian Conservatives cause the worst acts of it.
    The Moderates? They at least have a line that they will not cross.
    At least Most Moderates have a heart for someone beyond themselves, and they won`t be using faith and American Values to bride and scam people out of what they have.
    Would I EVER like to get back to those times.”

    get_a_grip: "Here again you attribute DIFFERENCES OF OPINION on how to solve our nation’s problems with heartlessness and general bad faith. You talk about hearts and minds quite a lot; do you know the hearts and minds of the people you attack? Share with us how you know these people’s motivations? And when exactly were these times you speak of?"

    djthereplay: You're damn right that I'm attributing DIFFERENCES OF OPINION on how to solve our nation's problems with heartlessness and general bad faith. As for how I know these people's motivations, and what times I'm referring to, actually, I don't. But then again, I don't need to. I don't need no stinking evidence to back this up. It's my worldview and my belief. That should be more than enough!

    3) djthereplay: "“Firstly, What's the problem with these TRUE Public Serving Warriors?, The Fact that they are willing to take the time out of their lives to contribute some of their financial resources and efforts to us, the citizens and taxpayers and consumers of this country who elect them to the office(s) that they are in and making sure we are allowed to have something to share as well?”

    get_a_grip: "What part of, 'There are not enough rich people to get us out of all of our nation’s problems' do you not understand? Why does the fact that Obama has received RECORD campaign donations from Wall Street not seem to bother you? Why is it only the “CONservatives” that you want to complain about?"

    djthereplay: I don't care if there's not enough rich people to get us out of this mess, just as long as they are taxed until they are no longer rich, that is all that matters. And you're right, get_a_grip, if Wall Street contributes to Obama and other Democrats, then it's alright. It's only when they contribute to Republicans and especially to CONservatives that I have a problem with it because I'm an intellectually dishonest partisan, and it's for the same reason that I'm complaining only about the CONservatives.

    - Dwight
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Okay, I think that I've made my point. So, djthereplay, On my 1), you have no choice but to concede--even if only by silence--that this is correct. However, on the other two, surely you can give your own response that is better than what I have attributed to you. But, if you are silent on this the next time that you post, then it means that the response that I attributed to you does in fact reflect your actual views.

    djtheeplay: JeffE, as I said before, "...I will post on here when [I'm] good and ready to."

    Me: That's fine. I will tune in here periodically and will look forward to seeing your next post.

    And djthereplay, if you don't eventually respond to either me, or really, to get_a_grip, in your next post--whenever you're ready to--then there are more of the statements that get_a_grip, cjflan32 and others have made to you that you haven't responded to that I can do the same exercise on.

    And mkdawuss, you're next. I believe that cjflan32 has been compiling a list of things that he said to you or that asked you that you didn't respond to. And I haven't forgotten about the one thing that I said to you in response to a question that you asked a couple of years ago that you didn't respond to either.

    "@cjflan32 has the nerve to call mkdawuss a WUSS."

    I'm drunk right now so I could be imagining this, but I'm gonna reply anyway.

    Until yesterday I've always referred to him as Carlos, MKDAWUSS, or by his full name. And yesterday I called him Mr. Lejjena, which is not even close to "WUSS."

    And just in case you were wondering Dwight, the reason it's capitalized is back in the day before we had to sign up for LiveJournal we had Vox, where mkdawuss' screen name was MKDAWUSS. I just got used to it. Examples can be seen here:

    http://www.olbermannwatch.com/archives/2010/02/claim_msnbc_loo.php#comments

    I digress. Show me one instance where I shortened "MKDAWUSS" to "WUSS."

    I didn't. It never happened.

    tonyome did, but not me.

    Johnny Dollar did, but not me.

    get_a_grip did, but not me.

    So that means once again Dwight is making shit up. Maybe you should trade in your Disney collection for a set of Schoolhouse Rock DVD's.

    In any event, you're either lying or have serious reading issues. So for your sake and more importantly CARLOS', stop talking already.

    Guess I wasn't that drunk.

    "And mkdawuss, you're next. I believe that cjflan32 has been compiling a list of things that he said to you or that asked you that you didn't respond to."

    I lost track. If you open up a random thread over the past two years you're likely to find something the kid ignored.

    Oh, excuse me. They weren't dodged and ignored. He "wasn't here" to respond to them.

    MKDAWUSS is hilarious. He complains that he's not here to take on his criticism but when he does show up he uses the time to lie about charity, screw up Gibson's BTB story and misconstrue what "you all" are writing.

    Brilliant.

    Actually, Wussy. Gibson's radio show is live noon-3pm EST. It's taped for later broadcast in many markets. And it's always lively. More liberal callers than any other show. And Gibby smashes them with ease.

    "Actually, Wussy. Gibson's radio show is live noon-3pm EST. It's taped for later broadcast in many markets. And it's always lively. More liberal callers than any other show. And Gibby smashes them with ease."

    Funny how you wrote a whole WPITW abstract and MKDAWUSS focuses on the comfort radio of a dialysis patient.

    Before that he had the nerve to say we're always accusing him of dodging questions and ignoring issues.

    "Bronze:Dr. Garrett D. Hinshaw, president of Catawba Valley Community College in North Carolina for banning a student who was against his Student ID card to be used as a debit card to gain his grant money. It seems that said student's info was sold to a number of outfits garnering him a lot of spam. When he complained, Dr. Hinshaw banned him from campus for two semesters.

    This time, got to agree. Student had a problem and has a right to air it. But with Olby, there is always something missing."

    What was missing syvyn?

    Could it be the Facebook post that said "Anyone know any good viruses to send them? Maybe we should register them with every porn site known to man"? It was the students own words:

    http://www.gastongazette.com/articles/college-61886-posted-kicked.html#ixzz1ay3mrC6I

    Funny how that quote didn't make the WPITW report. A real journalist would've reported both sides of the story.

    Oh, and Olbermann calling the college "Catawba Valley Community Crapshack" was real classy. Unfortunately not all of us can go to Cornell Ag School.

    Ok, @cjflan32,

    I see where you didn`t call mkdawuss a WUSS, and instead, you refered to him as Carlos.
    That still doesn`t cover you from you accusing us of dodging your questions, smearing, etc.
    But @get_a_grip, You call mkdawuss a WUSS again, and I will give you a reason to call someone a WUSS on here. Here's an example:
    @syvyn11 I know that you didn`t call anybody on here Wussy, Did you? ... while you are giving mkdawuss a bunch of IDIOT TALK.
    I`d like to hear a piece of Gibson's Radio Show myself.
    Maybe, Your Definition of Gibby Smashing liberal callers with ease is responding to them with a whole bunch of IDIOT TALK.
    Remember this next time you decide to call someone wussy on here who will disagree with you, ok?

    @cjflan32, Thank you for bringing up @johnny dollar, I`ll "spend" him somemore later .

    - Dwight


    Ok, @cjflan32,

    I see where you didn`t call mkdawuss a WUSS, and instead, you refered to him as Carlos.
    That still doesn`t cover you from you accusing us of dodging your questions, smearing, etc.
    But @get_a_grip, You call mkdawuss a WUSS again, and I will give you a reason to call someone a WUSS on here. Here's an example:
    @syvyn11 I know that you didn`t call anybody on here Wussy, Did you? ... while you are giving mkdawuss a bunch of IDIOT TALK.
    I`d like to hear a piece of Gibson's Radio Show myself.
    Maybe, Your Definition of Gibby Smashing liberal callers with ease is responding to them with a whole bunch of IDIOT TALK.
    Remember this next time you decide to call someone wussy on here who will disagree with you, ok?

    @cjflan32, Thank you for bringing up @johnny dollar, I`ll "spend" him somemore later . LOL

    - Dwight


    "I see where you didn`t call mkdawuss a WUSS, and instead, you refered to him as Carlos.
    That still doesn`t cover you from you accusing us of dodging your questions, smearing, etc. "

    Nope. It doesn't.

    When MKDAWUSS brings up Olbermann's charity, gets told he's wrong, doubles down on it because he doesn't know what a "month" is, gets told he's wrong again, disappears for a day, and returns to make up arguments and take a shot at John Gibson (which had nothing to do with anything anyone was talking about) and proceeded TO GET THAT WRONG AS WELL, that covers me accusing him of dodging questions.

    And again, you've been here a week, the rest of us have been here for years. So maybe you should do a little history before backing someone up

    As for you, well, you respond to what you want to respond to. JeffE explained that so I don't have to.

    "But @get_a_grip, You call mkdawuss a WUSS again, and I will give you a reason to call someone a WUSS on here."

    Sounds like a threat of violence, get_a_grip. That's William Dwight Stewart Jr. bro.

    OK, this is just getting ridiculous.

    Dwight, did it ever occur to you WHY people call Carlos "WUSS?"

    BECAUSE HIS INTERNET NAME IS MKDAWUSS!

    HE SPREADS IT AROUND ALL OVER THE INTERNET!

    IT'S HIS AIM!

    IT'S HIS E-MAIL!

    THE LOGICAL SHORTNAME IS WUSS OR WUSSY!

    WHAT'S NEXT? YOU GONNA RIP EVERYONE FOR CALLING DJWOLF DJ?

    FOR CALLING PEWP_HEAD PEWP?

    FOR CALLING JOHNNY DOLLAR J$?

    FOR CALLING WOLVERINE WOLVIE?

    FOR CALLING MIKE C. MIKEY?

    FOR CALLING ME CJ?

    FOR CALLING YOU DJ?

    IF THAT'S NOT BAD ENOUGH, THERE'S NOT A SINGLE INSTANCE WHERE ANY OF THE PEOPLE I MENTIONED ARE USING THE PHRASE "WUSS" IN THE MANNER YOU'RE SUGGESTING.

    DON'T BOTHER TRYING TO SQUIRM YOUR WAY OUT OF IT. YOU SAID THIS TO ME:

    "@cjflan32 has the nerve to call mkdawuss a WUSS."

    WHICH YOU YOURSELF JUST ADMITTED WAS A LIE. AGAIN, NOT A SINGLE ONE OF THE GUYS I MENTIONED USED "WUSS" IN THE FASHION YOU MENTIONED. PERIOD.

    BEFORE YOU EMBARRASS YOURSELF FURTHER, THE ONLY USE OF THE TERM "WUSS" IN THE FASHION YOU SUGGEST WAS USED BY MEERKATPOOH:

    "I started a hash tag on twitter #wherewaskeith It's true if you think about it, he of course shows up at this "hippie rally" down in NYC, but yeah...where was Keith when the Tea Party ones were going on? Matter of fact, where was Keith during the RNC in '08? Oh yeah, back in NY thinking something was going to happen to him. Wuss"

    AND BEFORE YOU EMBARRASS YOURSELF EVEN FURTHER, YOU'RE NOT A MIND-READER, SO DON'T BOTHER SAYING "I KNEW WHAT THEY MEANT."

    YOU SHOULD STOP WORRYING ABOUT OTHER PEOPLE'S CHOICE IN USERNAMES AND START WORRYING ABOUT THE HORRIBLE COMMENTS YOU'RE PUTTING OUT.

    “Since you can`t understand what I am trying to say, let me put it to you in other terms that you can`t see, or that you all FAIL to figure out.
    Do you know why I said " I love it when Keith Olbermann curses these CONS out ", or something along those lines ?
    Because, as much as Keith's mouth gets subhuman on occasion,
    HIS MOUTH IS DEFENDING THE VERY THINGS THAT ARE KEEPING ME AFLOAT IN MY LIFE THAT THESE CONS IN CONGRESS ARE TRYING TO ULTAMITLY TAKE AWAY FROM ME THROUGH THEIR FINANCIAL NEGLECT OF US (THEIR CITIZENS), and 2 HOLY WARS, etc. AND WILL STOP AT NOTHING TO DO SO. THAT IS SUBHUMANITY TO ME ALSO.”

    You have ADMITTED that you think it is the media’s job to protect the Left using whatever LIES and name-calling they see fit; so how do you know that all that you believe about the Right stacks up to REALITY? Speaking thus…

    “If the language didn`t matter to you as much, Why is it that
    you used mkdawuss' FEW critisms against Keith Olbermann for his swearing, and (ONLY KEITH OLBERMANN'S SWEARING) against me?”

    Are you psychotic? Are you completely DAFT?

    First of all, MKDAWUSS does NOT make criticisms against Olbermann; not even a “FEW.” Please cite an example of that happening. Secondly, my criticisms are MY OWN and they have had absolutely NOTHING--I repeat--NOTHING to do with “swearing.”

    My first post to you that challenged your assertions directly on October 12 at 3:11 PM, dealt entirely with Olbermann making accusations that various people incited murder based on LIES and POOR LOGIC.

    YOU did not defend his lies or explain how I was wrong about his poor logic. You IGNORED that.

    My second such post on October 13 at 2:29 PM I pointed out how you admitted that it is the media’s job to protect Obama by LYING and calling Republicans racists and Nazis.

    You did not say I was wrong. You IGNORED that.

    I said that the Left just call people names instead of debating the issues.

    You did not say I was wrong; in fact you have reaffirmed that same notion. Yet it is only the RIGHT that are “CONS”

    Then I picked apart your stupid logic thereof.

    You did not defend yourself. You IGNORED that.

    In my October 13, 2:32 PM post, I spelled out further for you how illogical you and Olbermann are in your attack against O’Reilly.

    You did not explain how I am wrong. You IGNORED that.

    Do you get the picture here? None of that had to do with swearing, dumbass (but that does).

    “Y'all`s whole " Warren Buffett evades his taxes " thing, is called you are not wanting to except his contributions.”

    No…MY--I repeat--MY “Warren Buffett evades his taxes” thing is called Warren Buffett OWES money to the IRS and yet he has the unmitigated GALL to point to himself and say, “I don’t pay enough taxes so we should change the tax code so people like me will have to pay more.” What a MARTYR! What a SAINT!
    …what a weasel.

    “You don`t actually want him to pay very much in taxes.”

    I would be content if he would just pay the taxes he OWES!

    “THIS IS WEAK !!!!”

    Yes, your post was weak…very weak. In fact, I didn’t think it was possible that anyone could be more stupid than MKDAWUSS.

    Oh yeah, I forgot. The inspiration for my previous post.

    "But @get_a_grip, You call mkdawuss a WUSS again, and I will give you a reason to call someone a WUSS on here."

    If I wasn't hammered I would've mentioned this last night. Nevermind what appears to be the threat of violence, shame on get_a_grip for shortening MKDAWUSS' name to "WUSS."

    I'll dumb it down for you Dwight: No one called MKDAWUSS "a wuss" or "a wussy." They called him "wuss." Or "wussy." Big difference if you're smart enough to understand it.

    Actually, the only people calling MKDAWUSS "a wuss," is you.

    Regardless, if Carlos didn't like his sn he wouldn't have pasted it over everything he writes on the Internet. So take it up with him.

    Do they sell clues at The Disney Store?

    Oh, and get_a_grip, watch your back. If Dwight brings Timon, Pumbaa and Rafiki with him you're done.

    "But @get_a_grip, You call mkdawuss a WUSS again, and I will give you a reason to call someone a WUSS on here."

    Oh, that’s rich coming from the guy who loves to see people “Vulgarly attacked” or treated as subhuman.

    In the words of Keith Olbermann when Rush Limbaugh challenged MSNBC to not talk about him for a week……

    Fuck you!

    "First of all, MKDAWUSS does NOT make criticisms against Olbermann; not even a 'FEW.' Please cite an example of that happening. Secondly, my criticisms are MY OWN and they have had absolutely NOTHING--I repeat--NOTHING to do with 'swearing.'"

    Actually, "few" would be accurate.

    You'll recall that MKDAWUSS was shocked and surprised by those S.E. Cupp comments.

    But only because he opposes abortion.

    But he doesn't oppose the other nasty comments Olbermann has aimed at other females.

    Nor does he oppose to Allen West and Herman Cain being insulted for the crime of being black and conservative.

    You get the idea.

    Cj, wuss is going to do what wuss is going to do. He's a jerk and always be one.

    If it makes Wussy feel good about himself dissing me, he's got a sad life.

    "But he doesn't oppose the other nasty comments Olbermann has aimed at other females."

    Like what? Are you still going to cling to the "mashed up bag" comment? That was taken out of context and construed as sexist when it wasn't. Then again, you all made it seem like Keith was defending a rapist and condoning rape when he wasn't. He even had to clarify those comments for you all.

    (And now I'm having to dig out old stuff... Oh well, that's alright, old stuff has been brought up all the time around here...)


    "In the words of Keith Olbermann when Rush Limbaugh challenged MSNBC to not talk about him for a week……"

    It was 30 days.

    "Nor does he oppose to Allen West and Herman Cain being insulted for the crime of being black and conservative."

    When has Keith EVER done that? He's criticized and called them out, but it's not because of the fact that they're black; it's because of something they said or did (or didn't say or do).

    "Cj, wuss is going to do what wuss is going to do. He's a jerk and always be one. If it makes Wussy feel good about himself dissing me, he's got a sad life."

    I didn't mean to paint it that way. Wait, yes I did.

    To clarify you provided another example of typical Olbermann garbage and out of all that MKDAWUSS pulls out a portion of a sentence that has everything to do with your sleeping habits and nothing to do with Olbermann and still managed to mess it up.

    And mind you, this came AFTER he said "you all" were making things up when I accused him of ignoring things. Blah blah blah.

    "Like what? Are you still going to cling to the "mashed up bag" comment? That was taken out of context and construed as sexist when it wasn't."

    Well, I'm going to cling to it until you stop making excuses for it. Perhaps you could explain how it WASN'T sexist?

    But no, I do have others. Twelfth comment down. I listed a bunch. Or were those taken out of context too?

    Is that something you missed Carlos? I'd hate to accuse you of "ignoring" things again.

    "Then again, you all made it seem like Keith was defending a rapist and condoning rape when he wasn't. He even had to clarify those comments for you all."

    I hope at this point you're using the phrase "you all" to aggravate me. STOP USING MY COMMENTS TO PAINT EVERYONE YOU DON'T LIKE WITH THE SAME BRUSH.

    As for the "rape" issue, I assume you're referring to the Assange issue.

    The only thing I said about it in regards to Olbermann was Michael Moore was lying and Olbermann didn't challenge him.

    And you always lump me in with everyone else when you say "you all," THAT MAKES YOU A LIAR FOR THE MILLIONTH GODDAMN TIME!

    "(And now I'm having to dig out old stuff... Oh well, that's alright, old stuff has been brought up all the time around here...)"

    And boy, did you do a lousy job with it.

    "When has Keith EVER done that? He's criticized and called them out, but it's not because of the fact that they're black; it's because of something they said or did (or didn't say or do)."

    You mean besides his own standard that says disagreeing with a person of color is racist?

    You mean besides sitting in approval while Garofalo called Cain a "token black guy who's just a Republican plant to make then look not racist?"

    Uh, nothing, I guess. (sarcasm)

    Newsflash Carlos: When someone says "A" and the person they're talking to nods and says "uh huh" and nothing else, THAT MEANS THEY AGREE WITH THEM.

    But it's interesting that you didn't add "conservative" to your comment. Very interesting.

    I'm sure "you all" can flesh this out. I'm about to tear MKDAWUSS a new one.

    MKDAWUSS posted at 10:10 p.m. Sunday night.

    Not a word about his lie saying I "condemned" liberals for making money.

    Not a word about butchering the Gibson-Olbermann story.

    Not a word about his lie saying I brought up Warren Buffet.

    Not a word about him not understand the difference between Jeffery Immelt's personal wealth and GE not paying taxes.

    And STILL nothing about Olbermann's charitable contributions, an argument HE STARTED!!!

    You were just here! And the above post is what you chose to get on?

    How does this work Carlos? You (allegedly) don't show up on a particular day and therefore anything said on that day doesn't exist?

    So you either read them and don't respond or you don't read them because you know what they're about.

    Either way that means YOU ARE dodging questions and ignoring issues!

    You got some balls kid.

    "Like what? Are you still going to cling to the "mashed up bag" comment? That was taken out of context and construed as sexist when it wasn't."

    Let's travel to MKDAWUSSville where we pretend this comment wasn't sexist.


    ZOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM


    OK, now we're in MKDAWUSSville and that comment wasn't sexist.

    DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND THAT THAT COMMENT IS OFFENSIVE AND NOT APPROPRIATE TO SAY ON TELEVISION?

    DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND THAT, WHEN YOU HAVE A PROBLEM WITH SOMEONE LIKE MICHELLE MALKIN, THERE ARE OTHER WAYS TO HANDLE IT?

    GET WITH IT ALREADY!

    Now I ask again: In your own words, which means no video, no transcript, YOUR OWN OPINION, how is that comment not sexist? How is that comment taken out of context.

    For once, in the two years you've been here, prove you can actually think and comprehend things yourself.

    Or, y'know, just "dodge" and "ignore" it.

    No responses? I guess MKDAWUSS decided not to be around again. I've always found it strange when people go to the comments section, any comments section, reply and ask questions then leave. That's saying something.

    I'd like to think MKDAWUSS is off trying to find the quote where I, cjflan32, accused Olbermann of defending a rapist.

    The reason it's taking so long is because it doesn't exist. A lot of the things MKDAWUSS attributes to me don't exist.

    That's why MKDAWUSS can't challenge me directly. That's why he has to say "you all." That's why he has to LIE.

    Or maybe he's trying to figure out how the phrase "mashed up meat bag with lipstick" was taken out of context and not sexist.

    Asking a Countdown fan to explain something in their own words is a pretty big deal. I don't expect a response.

    Then again, Carlos probably left the building immediately after writing that stuff last night so he could come back today and say "There "you all" go again attacking me for not answering questions when I'm not here."

    "(And now I'm having to dig out old stuff... Oh well, that's alright, old stuff has been brought up all the time around here...)"

    Hey that's a good idea!

    Funny thing about that "old stuff" is you didn't want to talk about it then either.

    Then when you do, like last night, you have to lie to prove your point.

    But yeah, great idea. Let's start at the beginning!

    http://www.olbermannwatch.com/archives/2010/02/liz_cheney_resp.php#comments

    The topic: The Underwear Bomber is afraid of enclosed places, waterboarding is a "war crime," John Dean wants to see prosecutions for alleged crimes Dick Cheney was cleared of (or something like that), Liz Cheney explains that waterboarding worked, and so on and so forth."

    MKDAWUSS responds:

    "Keith-O just goes where the facts take him."

    Almost two years later that's proven to be a joke.

    "Well what else was that attack but an act of terrorism?"

    I sure hope MKDAWUSS was talking about the Underwear Bomber and not waterboarding.

    Don't worry people, it gets better...

    "You'll recall that MKDAWUSS was shocked and surprised by those S.E. Cupp comments."

    Actually, I did recall that one instance, but that does not change the fact that djtherapy is delusional for thinking that I based my criticisms on anything that WUSS said.

    Seriously, if he can't figure out who is who and who is saying what and if he can't come back up out of the rabbit hole and join us in the real world and actually post things that at least somewhat correspond to reality, he shouldn't be here.

    "It was 30 days."

    Good to know that's the only thing I've gotten wrong in this whole thread.

    Tell me WUSS, what does it tell you that your new friend gets righteously indignant over some of us calling you WUSS, but he has had nothing say about the many times and many ways that at least two of us have suggested that you are stupid?

    djtherapy, I hate to tell you this, but you've already given me a "reason to call someone a WUSS on here" and that someone is YOU.

    Give me a real answer to my questions; that's the only thing you could do here that would possibly make me afraid.

    So let me get this straight.

    In 2009, Limbaugh challenged MSNBC to not mention him for 30 days.

    And Olbermann's response was "Fuck you." Topped off with a picture of Limbaugh that bounced up and down.

    Thanks for clearing that up Carlos. Another fine example of class from the champion of the Progressives.

    Hey @cjflan32,

    You missed the last portion of Keith Olbermann's 30 Days without mentioning Rush Limbaugh on his program comment in his WTF Moment Segment.

    Keith Olbermann ALSO SAID that he would go 30 days on his program without mentioning what has been done, or said, boasted about by Rush Limbaugh, PROVIDED that Rush Limbaugh goes 30 days on HIS program without mentioning what has been done, or said, or boasted about by ... Rush Limbaugh.
    I wonder what Rush Limbaugh did to break HIS Side of THAT Deal.
    The ONLY deals that Rush Limbaugh makes are ONE WAY STREET Deals that only covers HIS OWN Backside.

    What an example of class from the Champion of Conservatives who act like a bunch of CONS.

    Thanks for bringing this up to CARLOS mkdawuss. I watched the show when it aired.

    Now, @get_a_grip,

    Once Again, CALL MKDAWUSS A WUSS AGAIN, AND I`LL GIVE YOU SOMEONE TO CALL A WUSS. TRY ME CAP'N, SEE WHAT WILL HAPPEN !!!!

    Also, If you can`t get on here and post some facts about WHY Keith Olbermann attacks the way he does, then you don`t need to even tell me ANYTHING. You all don`t take on ANYTHING unless Keith Olbermann attacks it, and you all sling sling mudd at Keith Olbermann for his attacking, and the way that he takes on the issues.
    You are blasting me based on how I have gotten wrong at times who posted what on here? THAT's WEAK TO ME.
    No, YOU ALL need to wake up and get into the real world.
    Because OlbermannWatch FAILS to take a second at trying to find the REAL Reason WHY Keith Olbermann attacks CONS on his show, or whatever, where ever the way he does.

    - Dwight

    "No, YOU ALL need to wake up and get into the real world.
    Because OlbermannWatch FAILS to take a second at trying to find the REAL Reason WHY Keith Olbermann attacks CONS on his show, or whatever, where ever the way he does."

    Simple answer. Because The False Murrow is too chickenshit to have someone on his show that offers a different opinion than he holds. He knows he would be taken to task for all of the rediculous propaganda he spews from left wing blogs with no attributed sources.

    djthereplay, you are an absolute disgrace to the name dj. If you did your research or followed this blog for numerous years, we beat that dead horse about how your wet dream won't allow opposing points of view on his show.

    "Once Again, CALL MKDAWUSS A WUSS AGAIN, AND I`LL GIVE YOU SOMEONE TO CALL A WUSS. TRY ME CAP'N, SEE WHAT WILL HAPPEN !!!!"

    Yeah, because it's so much more intimidating the second time around.

    I haven't called MKDAWUSS a wuss; but I will now just to spite you:

    He's a wuss wuss wuss wuss wuss wuss wuss!!!!!!!!!!

    "Also, If you can`t get on here and post some facts about WHY Keith Olbermann attacks the way he does, then you don`t need to even tell me ANYTHING."

    Unless you can give ME some facts that the Republicans are just heartless as you claim, YOU don't need to tell ME anything. Unlike you, I don't pretend to know for a "fact" what people's true motivations are; but my guess is that he lies because he's a liar and he's vulgar because he's a pervert.

    And NEWS FLASH! Most civilized people don't accept the notion that you should attack people employing lies and slander simply because they have different ideas about how to solve our nation's problems.

    Again WUSS, your new friend chastises me for calling you WUSS but has absolutely nothing to say about those of us who have flat out called you an idiot.

    "Keith Olbermann ALSO SAID that he would go 30 days on his program without mentioning what has been done, or said, boasted about by Rush Limbaugh, PROVIDED that Rush Limbaugh goes 30 days on HIS program without mentioning what has been done, or said, or boasted about by ... Rush Limbaugh. "

    I saw the comment. It made no sense. Here it is:

    "He said he'd agree to the prohibition "provided you go 30 days on your program without mentioning what has been done or said or boasted about by Rush Limbaugh. Hannity would last longer on the waterboard.'"

    It's also hypocritical coming from the guy who make up ratings numbers and throws up a chart to brag about donating $25,000 (any comments on that Carlos?).

    To host a show like these people do requires a certain ego of epic proportions. All of these guy should take a month off from talking about themselves.

    "I wonder what Rush Limbaugh did to break HIS Side of THAT Deal."

    It's great to know that you didn't even bother to find what Limbaugh did. Didn't "catch that." right?

    "The ONLY deals that Rush Limbaugh makes are ONE WAY STREET Deals that only covers HIS OWN Backside."

    Someone else is gonna have to take that one because I don't know what that has to do with anything.

    "What an example of class from the Champion of Conservatives who act like a bunch of CONS."

    Well, Limbaugh's an a-hole, I'll give you that. Comes with the talk radio territory I suppose.

    Not gonna argue with you on that. Unlike you, I don't pretend that the problems in this country are limited to one mindset.

    "Again WUSS, your new friend chastises me for calling you WUSS but has absolutely nothing to say about those of us who have flat out called you an idiot"

    New friend? Come on dude, it's pretty obvious "MK" wants nothing to do with this guy.

    Blatant partisanship?

    OK to insult those you disagree with?

    Threats of violence?

    Keeps attributing quotes to the wrong person?

    Thinks the man's screen name is an insult?

    MKDAWUSS is making a good call here.

    "Once Again, CALL MKDAWUSS A WUSS AGAIN, AND I`LL GIVE YOU SOMEONE TO CALL A WUSS. TRY ME CAP'N, SEE WHAT WILL HAPPEN !!!!"

    Dwight, people call him "WUSS" because it is the logical shorthand for it. What part of this isn't clear? I think it's pretty well understood between the parties involved.

    I wrote TWO POSTS regarding your awful comment about MKDAWUSS being called "a wuss."

    Up until a half hour ago no one called MKDAWUSS "a wuss."

    I repeat, UP UNTIL A HALF HOUR AGO, NO ONE CALLED MKDAWUSS "A WUSS."

    And I also repeat that I wrote TWO POSTS REGARDING THIS UNBELIEVABLY ILL-CONCEIVED COMMENT.

    "Firstly, mkdawuss and I will post on here when we are good and ready to."-djthereplay

    Well Dwight, I guess you'll address this wuss/a wuss thing followed up with some more empty threats of violence when you're "good and ready to."

    "And once again DJTheReplay and I are expected to comment while we're not here, in which we are accused of dodging questions and ignoring issues, a common activity of the rest of you all."-MKDAWUSS

    Well Carlos, there's another example of why "you all" say things like this. I believe this whole "a wuss" thing falls into the "ignoring" category, wouldn't you agree?

    "Because OlbermannWatch FAILS to take a second at trying to find the REAL Reason WHY Keith Olbermann attacks CONS on his show, or whatever, where ever the way he does."

    It doesn't matter why. It's uncalled for. If you want to criticize conservatives, then criticize conservatives. There's no need for insults.

    There was a recent criticism of Allen West that MKDAWUSS wanted no part of. In it, between his show and his Twitter account Olbermann called Allen West a "jackass," "batsh*t crazy" and insinuated he was going to "shoot people."

    What's the "real reason" for saying things like that Dwight? Take a "second" and explain it to everyone?

    "Unless you can give ME some facts that the Republicans are just heartless as you claim, YOU don't need to tell ME anything. Unlike you, I don't pretend to know for a "fact" what people's true motivations are; but my guess is that he lies because he's a liar and he's vulgar because he's a pervert."

    He lies because that's what his followers want to hear.

    He's vulgar because that's also what his followers want to hear.

    As I said the other day these commentators attract certain people. Dwight likes to hear the vulgarity and MKDAWUSS likes to hear his opinion validated.

    It's not just them, but they're the examples we have.

    That's just my opinion, not presenting it as fact. As if either one of them know the difference.

    Hey @cjflan32,

    Again, I see where you said that you didn`t call anyone a WUSS.
    You have successfully cleared your name (on that only).
    You didn`t call anyone a wuss. Good for You.
    I was talking to @get_a_grip when I said, " CALL MKDAWUSS A WUSS AGAIN, AND I`LL GIVE YOU SOMEONE TO CALL A WUSS. TRY ME CAP'N,
    SEE WHAT WILL HAPPEN !!!! " Read the part of the post where I posted @get_a_grip before I said that.

    Because Unfortunatly, @get_a_grip must not quite understand where I`m getting at when I asked him not to call mkdawuss a WUSS.

    But at least YOU @cjflan32 are willing to talk about some issues, although we may disagree with each other on them.
    I LOVE Talking issues.

    @get_a_grip must have NEVER gotten a taste of his OWN Medicine in his life. So, Let me give it to him.

    Later !,
    - Dwight

    @get_a_grip,

    So since you feel the urge on here to call someone who disagrees with you a wuss on here, then that must make you " DROPS ".

    It's not get_a_grip, it's DROPS !!!, because YOU can`t seem to live by that motto and actually get a grip and quit calling someone who disagrees with you on here a wuss.


    On the other side, We may not agree on much, but I`m glad to see that you admit to at least a portion of what Limbaugh is doing.

    - Dwight

    Leave a new comment